Christopher Dougherty EC220 - Introduction to econometrics: past examinations and marking schemes 2011 exam Original citation: Dougherty, C. (2012) EC220 - Introduction to econometrics: past examinations and marking schemes. [Teaching Resource] © 2011 The Author This version available at: http://learningresources.lse.ac.uk/160/ Available in LSE Learning Resources Online: May 2012 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License. This license allows the user to remix, tweak, and build upon the work even for commercial purposes, as long as the user credits the author and licenses their new creations under the identical terms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ http://learningresources.lse.ac.uk/ Summer 2011 examination EC220 Introduction to Econometrics 2010/2011 syllabus only. Not for resit candidates. Instructions to candidates Time allowed: 3 hours + 15 minutes reading time This paper contains EIGHT questions. Answer any FOUR questions. All questions will be given equal weight (25%). You are supplied with: Graph paper Statistical tables Calculators are NOT allowed in this examination. LSE 2011/EC220 Page 1 of 14 Abbreviations used in this examination iid IV OLS s.e. independently and identically distributed instrumental variables ordinary least squares standard error Results that may be assumed For the purposes of this examination, you may assume without proof the following results (both from the Weak Law of Large Numbers). Suppose that a random variable X is distributed with population mean X and finite variance X2 . Then the mean X of a sample of n independent observations of X is a consistent estimator of X: plim X X and the mean square deviation is a consistent estimator of the variance: plim 1 n X n X var X X2 E X i X 2 i 2 i 1 You may also assume without proof the following associated result (Continuous Mapping Theorem). Suppose that random variables X and Y are distributed with population means X and Y and finite variances. Then plim LSE 2011/EC220 1 n X n i X Yi Y cov X , Y E X i X Yi Y i 1 Page 2 of 14 1. Some practitioners of econometrics advocate ‘standardizing’ each variable in a regression by subtracting its sample mean and dividing by its sample standard deviation. Thus, if the original regression specification is Yi 1 2 X i u i the revised specification is Yi* 1* 2* X i* v i where Yi* Yi Y X X and X i* i , sY sX Y and X are the sample means of Y and X, sY and sX are the sample standard deviations of Y and X, defined as sY 1 n 2 Yi Y n and s X i 1 1 n X n X , 2 i i 1 and n is the number of observations in the sample. Let the fitted models for the two specifications be written Yˆ b b X i 1 2 i and Yˆi* b1* b2* X i* (a) [3 marks] Taking account of the definitions of Y * and X * , provide an interpretation of b2* (b) [3 marks] Show that b1* 0 . [Note: To do this, you must use the regression expression for b1* .] (c) [3 marks] Write down the regression expressions for b2* , first assuming the regression specification should include an intercept, second assuming that it should not include an intercept, and show that the expressions are equivalent. s (d) [3 marks] Show that b2* X b2 . [Note: To do this, you must use the regression expressions sY for b2* and b2 .] 1 ˆ (e) [3 marks] Hence show that Yˆi* Yi Y . sY (f) [2 marks] Hence show that ei* 1 ei . sY (g) [3 marks] Hence show that s.e. b2* sX s.e. b2 . [Note: s.e. = standard error.] sY (h) [2 marks] Hence find the relationship between the t statistic for b2* and the t statistic for b2. (i) [3 marks] Also, find the relationship between R2 for the original specification and R2 for the revised specification. LSE 2011/EC220 Page 3 of 14 2. A data set contains data on the years of formal training, training qualifications, years of work experience, and hourly earnings in rupees in 2010 for a sample of 100 refrigeration mechanics in India. Most refrigeration mechanics acquire their skills through informal apprenticeships and have no formal training. Some have one year of formal training at a training institute and earn the Refrigeration Mechanic Certificate if they pass the test at the end. Some take a second year of training and earn the Refrigeration Mechanic Diploma if they pass the test at the end. Trainees may continue to the second year of training only if they have passed the test at the end of the first year. Dummy variables RMC and RMD are defined as follows: RMC = 1 for those who have had at least one year of formal training and have passed the test for the Refrigeration Mechanic Certificate, but have not passed the test for the Refrigeration Mechanic Diploma. RMC = 0 for all others. RMD = 1 for those who have had two years of formal training and have passed the test for the Refrigeration Mechanic Diploma. RMD = 0 for all others. Three regressions are performed: (1) The logarithm of hourly earnings on EXP, number of years of work experience, and TRAINING, number of years of formal training at a training institute. (2) The logarithm of hourly earnings on EXP, RMC, and RMD. (3) The logarithm of hourly earnings on EXP, TRAINING, RMC, and RMD. The regression results are shown in the table (standard errors in parentheses; RSS = residual sum of squares.) EXP TRAINING RMC RMD constant R2 RSS (1) 0.030 (0.005) 0.200 (0.020) — — 2.00 (0.60) 0.35 105.0 (2) 0.028 (0.005) — 0.18 (0.04) 0.30 (0.06) 2.24 (0.61) 0.40 100.0 (3) 0.029 (0.005) 0.100 (0.045) 0.10 (0.05) 0.20 (0.08) 2.10 (0.70) 0.42 95.0 (a) [4 marks] Provide an interpretation of the coefficient of TRAINING in regression (1), justifying it mathematically. (b) [4 marks] Provide an interpretation of the coefficient of RMD in regression (2), justifying it mathematically. (c) [3 marks] Provide an interpretation of the coefficient of RMD in regression (3), with a brief explanation in general terms. (d) [3 marks] Someone asserts that the earnings of diploma-holders are no higher than those of certificate-holders. Explain what you would need to do to test this hypothesis. This question continues on the next page. LSE 2011/EC220 Page 4 of 14 (e) [4 marks] Someone else asserts that the extra earnings of a diploma-holder, compared with those of a certificate-holder, are equal to the extra earnings of a certificate-holder, compared with the earnings of those with no formal training. Explain what you would need to do to test this hypothesis. (f) [4 marks] Someone else asserts that the TRAINING variable is sufficient and that adding the dummy variables in specification (3) does not improve the explanatory power of the model in any material way. Explain whether you would agree with this assertion. (g) [3 marks] Some of the training institutes were public and others were private. The researcher said that he thought that the holders of certificates and diplomas from the private institutes tended to earn less than those who had been trained in public institutes. Explain how you might test this assertion, given access to the data set. LSE 2011/EC220 Page 5 of 14 3. A researcher has a sample of 43 observations on a dependent variable, Y, and two potential explanatory variables, X and Z. He defines two further variables V and W as the sum of X and Z and the difference between them: Vi X i Z i Wi X i Z i He fits the following four regressions (1) A regression of Y on X and Z (2) A regression of Y on V and W (3) A regression of Y on V (4) A regression of Y on Z and V The table shows the regression results (standard errors in parentheses; RSS = residual sum of squares; there was an intercept, not shown, in each regression). Unfortunately, a goat ate part of the regression output and some of the numbers are missing. These are indicated by letters. V (1) 0.60 (0.04) 0.80 (0.04) — W — R2 RSS 0.60 200 X Z (2) — (3) — (4) — — — A (B) C (D) E F 0.72 (0.02) — H (I) J (K) — G 220 L M Each regression included an intercept (not shown). (a) [20 marks] Reconstruct each missing number if this is possible, giving a brief explanation. Detailed mathematical analysis is not required. If the calculation is too complicated to do without a calculator, you may instead earn full marks by indicating how the missing value should be calculated. If it is not possible to reconstruct a number, give a brief explanation. [1 mark each: A B C D E F H J L M 2 marks: K 4 marks each: G I ] (b) The correlation between X and Z was high. That between V and W was low. Explain the implications, if any, for a comparison of the regression results for specifications (1), (2), and (3) (i) [2 marks] making no assumption concerning the true values of the coefficients of X and Z in specification (1) (ii) [3 marks] assuming that the true coefficients of X and Z are the same. LSE 2011/EC220 Page 6 of 14 4. (a) A school has introduced an extra course of reading lessons for children starting school and a researcher is evaluating the impact of the course on the scores on a literacy test taken at the age of seven. In the first year of its implementation, those children whose surnames being A– M are assigned to the extra course, while the rest have the normal curriculum. The researcher hypothesizes that Y 1 2 D 3 CA u where Y is the score on the literacy test, D is a dummy variable that equal to 1 for those assigned to the extra course and 0 for the others, and CA is a measure of the cognitive ability of the child when starting school, and u is an iid (independently and identically distributed) disturbance term assumed to have a normal distribution. Unfortunately, the researcher has no data on CA. Using OLS (ordinary least squares), she fits the regression Yˆ b1 b2 D (i) [5 marks] Demonstrate, with a detailed mathematical proof, that b2 is an unbiased estimator of 2. (ii) [3 marks] A commentator says that the standard error of b2 will be invalid because an important variable, CA, has been omitted from the specification. The researcher replies that the standard error will remain valid if CA can be assumed to have a normal distribution. Explain whether the commentator or the researcher is correct. (iii) [3 marks] Another commentator says that whether the distribution of CA is normal or not makes no difference to the validity of the standard error. Evaluate this assertion. (b) The extra course is remedial in nature and the researcher thinks that its impact on the literacy test scores is likely to be inversely related to the ability of the children. (i) [3 marks] Show how the model may be extended to allow for this effect. (ii) [5 marks] Provide an interpretation of each of the parameters in the extended model, stating its likely sign, if this is possible. (iii) [4 marks] Explain why b2 in the simple regression in part (a) would now be a biased estimator of 2, and evaluate the direction of the bias. (c) [2 marks] The next year, the course becomes optional. The researcher takes a sample of data and again performs a simple regression of Y on D. Explain how the estimate of the slope coefficient is likely to be affected by the fact that the course is optional. LSE 2011/EC220 Page 7 of 14 5. (a) A variable Y is determined by a variable Z, the relationship being Y 2Z v where v is an iid (independently and identically distributed) disturbance term with mean 0 and variance v2 and the observations for Z are randomly drawn from a population with mean Z and variance Z2 . The observations on Z are subject to measurement error, the observed variable in observation i being Xi where X i Z i wi and wi is the measurement error. It may be assumed that w is iid with mean 0 and variance w2 and that Z, v, and w are distributed independently. When Y is regressed on X, given a sample of n observations, the OLS (ordinary least squares) estimator of 2 is n X Y i i b2OLS i 1 n X 2 i i 1 (i) [1 mark] Show how Y is related to X, stating mathematically the relationship. (ii) [1 mark] Explain why it is not possible to obtain a closed-form expression for the expectation of b2OLS . (iii) [5 marks] Demonstrate that b2OLS is an inconsistent estimator of 2 and that the limiting value is 2 2 w2 Z2 w2 Z2 For this purpose, you may use, without proof, the identity X i X Yi Y X i Yi nXY n n i 1 i 1 (iv) [2 marks] The large-sample bias is an inverse function of Z . Give an intuitive explanation for this. Y is a consistent estimator of 2. X (vi) [2 marks] Give an intuitive explanation for this. (v) [4 marks] Demonstrate mathematically that This question continues on the next page. LSE 2011/EC220 Page 8 of 14 (b) In a similar model, the dependent variable is also subject to measurement error. The true relationship is Q 2Z v where Z and v are as in part (a). Z is subject to measurement error w, the observed variable being X, with X and w being determined as in part (a). The dependent variable Q is subject to measurement error, the observed dependent variable Y being affected by the same measurement error, w, with factor 2: Yi Qi 2 wi (i) [5 marks] Explain whether, in this case, it is possible to determine whether b2OLS is (1) an unbiased estimator of 2, (2) a consistent estimator of 2. [Note: Detailed mathematical proofs are not required and no credit will be given for them.] (ii)` [2 marks] Give an intuitive explanation of why it is consistent, despite both variables being subject to measurement error. (iii) [3 marks] Explain whether, in this special case, having to regress Y on X instead of Q on Z has any advantages or disadvantages. Note: If it had been possible to regress Q on Z, the variance of the estimator would have been v2 n MSDZ where MSD(Z), the mean squared deviation of Z, is given by MSDZ LSE 2011/EC220 1 n Z n Z 2 i i 1 Page 9 of 14 6. A researcher has annual data for 30 years on aggregate output, Yt, aggregate consumption Ct, aggregate investment, It, and aggregate government expenditure, Gt, for a closed economy and wishes to fit the model C t 1 2 Yt u t (1) Yt C t I t Gt (2) Equation (2) is an income identity. The disturbance term ut in equation (1) may be assumed to be iid (independently and identically distributed) and, for the purposes of this question, any potential time series problems such as autocorrelation and nonstationarity may be ignored. The researcher believes that both I and G are exogenous variables and initially combines them into a single variable Z defined as their sum: Z = I + G. The revised identity is then Yt C t Z t (2*) (a) (i) [3 marks] Show how IV (instrumental variables) estimation, using Z as an instrument, can be used to fit equation (1) and demonstrate that the estimator is consistent. (ii) [3 marks] The variance of the IV estimator of 2 can be approximated as b2IV 2 u2 2 Yt Y T 1 rY2, Z u2 T MSDY 1 rY2, Z t 1 where rY,Z is the sample correlation between Y and Z, MSD(Y) is the sample mean square deviation of Y, and T is the number of observations in the sample. Explain the sense in which the expression for the variance is an approximation. (iii) [3 marks] Explain the implications of the fact that it is an approximation. (iv) [1 mark] The researcher now returns to equation (2), separating Zt into its two components It and Gt. Derive the reduced form equation for Yt using equations (1) and (2). (v) [2 marks] At a workshop, the researcher says that equation (1) could be fitted with either I or G as instruments, but it would be better to use TSLS (Two-Stage Least Squares). Explain in general terms why he said this. (vi) [3 marks] A commentator notes that the theoretical coefficients of It and Gt in the reduced form equation are the same. He says that, in this case, TSLS has no theoretical advantage. Evaluate this assertion. (vii) [2 marks] Another commentator says that, since the coefficients are the same, it will be impossible to tell whether variations in Y are due to variations in I or to variations in G, and hence one will have a problem of exact multicollinearity. Evaluate this assertion. (viii) [3 marks] Another commentator agrees, and says that the problem could be avoided by combining I and G into a single variable. Since their theoretical coefficients are the same, they should be given equal weight. Thus, in fact, one should use the variable Z defined earlier in this question. Evaluate this assertion. This question continues on the next page. LSE 2011/EC220 Page 10 of 14 (b) Suppose that, in fact, Y is determined exogenously and that I is determined endogenously, being equal to the rest of output after consumption and government expenditure have taken their share. Equation (2) should then be written I t Yt C t Gt (2**) with Yt and Gt exogenous. Equation (1) is as before. (i) [3 marks] Analyze the implications for the IV estimation of 2, using Z as an instrument, in part (a) (i). (ii) [2 marks] Explain how the model should be fitted in this case. LSE 2011/EC220 Page 11 of 14 7. Consider the model Yt 1 2 X t t (1) X t 2 X t 1 t (2) where 2 1 , t is an iid (independently and identically distributed) disturbance term, with zero mean and variance 2 , common to both equations, and X0 is generated randomly from the ensemble distribution for X. (a) (i) [2 marks] Explain what is meant by the ensemble distribution for X. (ii) [2 marks] Show that the ensemble distribution for X has zero mean. (iii) [3 marks] Show that the ensemble distribution for X has variance 2 1 22 (iv) [3 marks] Describe in general terms the properties of the OLS (ordinary least squares) estimator of 2, given a sample of data. [Note: Mathematical analysis is not required] (b) Equation (1) is fitted using a sample of T observations using OLS, the fitted model being Yˆ b b X t (i) [1 mark] 1 2 t Explain why one cannot evaluate E b2 for a finite sample, if 0 < 2 < 1. (ii) [3 marks] Derive the large sample bias for 2, if 0 < 2 < 1. (c) In a simulation, 1 = 5, 2 = 2, and t is generated as an iid variable with normal distribution with mean 0 and variance 1. The simulation is conducted for three sample sizes, T = 25, T = 100, and T = 400, and three different values of 2: 2 = 0, 2 = 0.5, and 2 = 1.0. The figure shows the distributions of b2 for 2 = 0.5 and 2 = 1.0 for each sample size, for 10 million samples. 50 T = 400, 2 = 1 40 30 20 T = 400, 2 = 0.5 10 T = 100, 2 = 1 T = 25, 2 = 1 T = 100, 2 = 0.5 T = 25, 2 = 0.5 0 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Distribution of b 2 (i) [3 marks] When 2 = 0, b2 is exactly equal to 3 for all samples, irrespectively of whether the sample size is 25, 100, or 400. Explain why this should be the case. This question continues on the next page. LSE 2011/EC220 Page 12 of 14 (ii) [2 marks] Explain whether the distributions in the figure support your asymptotic analysis in part (b) (ii). (iii) [3 marks] Explain why Y is cointegrated with X if 2 = 1.0. (iv) [3 marks] In the figure it is clear that the speed of the convergence of the distribution of b2 to its limiting spike is different for 2 = 0.5 and 2 = 1.0. Give an explanation There is a further question on the next page. LSE 2011/EC220 Page 13 of 14 8. A variable Yt is generated by the process Yt 1 u t where 1 is a fixed, unknown parameter and ut is a disturbance term. A researcher wishes to estimate 1 using a sample of T observations on Yt. (a) Assuming that ut is generated as an iid process. (i) [3 marks] Show from first principles that b1OLS Y is the OLS (ordinary least squares) estimator of 1. (ii) [1 mark] Show that it is an unbiased estimator of 1. (iii) [1 mark] Show that it is a consistent estimator of 1. (b) Assuming that the disturbance term ut is subject to AR(1) autocorrelation and is generated by the process u t u t 1 t where t is iid and 0 < < 1, (i) [2 marks] Show how the model may be rewritten Yt 1 1 Yt 1 t and explain the point of rewriting the relationship in this way. (ii) [2 marks] Explain in general terms why OLS would not yield an unbiased estimate of . (iii) [3 marks] Demonstrate mathematically that OLS would yield a consistent estimate of . (iv) [2 marks] Assuming that OLS will also provide a consistent estimate of the intercept 1 1 , show how one may obtain a consistent estimate of 1. (v) [2 marks] Demonstrate that Y remains an unbiased and consistent estimator of 1. (vi) [2 marks] Discuss whether it is possible to determine which of the two estimators of 1 has more desirable properties. (c) Assuming that the disturbance term ut is generated by the process u t u t 1 t where t is iid, and that the unobserved initial value of Y at time zero, Y0, happens to be equal to 1. (i) [1 mark] Explain why the technique in part (b) (iv) cannot be used to obtain an estimate of 1. (ii) [3 marks] Demonstrate that Y is an unbiased but inconsistent estimator of 1. Note: The variance of Y is T 12T 1 2 (iii) [1 mark] 6T Demonstrate that Y1, the value of Y in the first observation, is an unbiased but inconsistent estimator of 1. (iv) [2 marks] Explain which would be preferable as an estimator of 1: Y or Y1. LSE 2011/EC220 Page 14 of 14