Timberland Financial Reporting Jeff Mardis, CPA Audit Partner Sellers, Richardson, Holman & West, LLP DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 TIMBERLAND INVESTMENT SPECTRUM Investors can access the timberland investment market in multiple ways: CMBS and RMBS Debt Secured Debt (first mortgages) Investment grade (AAA – BBB) Unsecured Debt (public debt/mezzanine debt) Sub-inv. grade (BB and lower) Timberland ownership Equity REITs and Publicly Traded Companies Indirect ownership through publicly traded securities regulated by the SEC Direct Property Investment Direct fee or leasehold ownership of timber and timberland properties Private Investment Fund Indirect ownership through private securities of an investment fund that invests in timber and timberland DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 2 TIMBERLAND INVESTMENT SPECTRUM Private Investment Fund • Characteristics – – – – – – • Acquire timber companies or timberland assets Often created by Timber Investment Management Organizations (TIMOs) TIMO management team/ third party manager operates properties Fund typically has no employees Finite life funds – closed end; indefinite life funds – open end Multiple investors pooling money to invest with management team Accounting – – – – ASC 946 Financial Services-Investment Companies/AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide- Audits of Investment Companies/NCREIF PREA Guidance Fund level reporting represents aggregation of all investments Investments carried at fair value Operating Model • • – Non-Operating Model • • • – – • Operating Model-Consolidate direct investments and controlled investees Operating Model-Equity Method for non-controlled investees Generally employ a “net” presentation Authoritative GAAP does not specifically address when to consolidate another investment company GAAP prohibits applying the equity method. Investment must be measured at fair value Fair Value NAV should not be significantly different under either model Cash distributions from investments received; recorded as income or return of capital Analyst view – – Net asset value (provided) Performance returns – financial highlights (provided) DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 3 TIMBERLAND INVESTMENT SPECTRUM REITs and Publicly Traded Companies • Characteristics – – – – – • Accounting – – – – – – • Purchase/develop real estate Own, operate properties or hire manager Infinite life Regulated by Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Numerous investors – institutional and private Historical cost-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) Prohibited from applying Investment Company Accounting Consolidation of controlling interest Purchase price accounting for acquisitions Impairment analysis Straight-line rents Analyst view – Net asset value – Earnings per share (EPS) – Dividend Yield DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 4 TIMBERLAND INVESTMENT SPECTRUM Direct Property Investment • Characteristics – Acquire real estate assets through privately owned LLCs, LPs, Pension Separate Accounts – Often a very specific/defined investment goal – Usually high net-worth investors or large institutional investors • Accounting – Great diversity in reporting requirements – US historical cost GAAP, investment company accounting, income tax basis, Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) 35 or Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) 25 DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 5 TIMBERLAND INVESTMENT SPECTRUM Pension Separate Accounts • Characteristics TIMO or other manager hired to invest on behalf of a single-defined benefit pension plan (corporate; public employee) Acquires physical properties or timber deeds Property manager hired to manage property if investment manager is not integrated • Accounting FASB 35 and GASB 25 Investments at fair value Consolidation of controlled interests P/L with full operations reflected • Analyst view Net asset value (provided) Performance returns (supplemental) DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 6 ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENT COMPANY STATUS • An entity that is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the Act) automatically qualifies as an investment company. • Entities that are not regulated under the Act must have certain fundamental characteristics and consider other typical characteristics to determine whether they qualify as investment companies. An entity should consider its purpose and design when making the assessment. DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 7 INVESTMENT COMPANY FUNDAMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS An investment company must have the following fundamental characteristics: • The entity obtains funds from one or more investors and provides the investor(s) with investment management services. • The entity commits to its investor(s) that its business purpose and only substantive activities are investing the funds solely for returns from capital appreciation, investment income or both. • The entity or its affiliates do not obtain or have the objective of obtaining returns or benefits from an investee or its affiliates that are not normally attributable to ownership interests or that are other than capital appreciation or investment income. • An entity that does not have all of the fundamental characteristics would not be an investment company. DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 8 INVESTMENT COMPANY FUNDAMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS An investment company also has the following typical characteristics: • It has more than one investment. • It has more than one investor. • It has investors that are not related parties of the parent (if there is a parent) or the investment manager. • It has ownership interests in the form of equity or partnership interests. • It manages substantially all of its investments on a fair value basis. • An entity that does not have one or more of the typical characteristics could conclude that it is an investment company, but it would have to apply judgment and determine, considering all facts and circumstances, that its activities continue to be consistent with those of an investment company. DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 9 INVESTMENT COMPANY ACCOUNTING • Key accounting requirements: – Statement of Net Assets – Investments recorded at fair value (follow other GAAP for other assets and liabilities) – Schedule of investments and financial highlights DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 10 INVESTMENT COMPANY ACCOUNTING – Unrealized gain/loss vs. realized gain/loss: • Both are presented below the line on the financial statements, such as after net investment income (investment income minus expenses) • Unrealized relates to any changes in fair value of the investment from one reporting period to the next • Realized gain/loss relates to the sale of the investment-it reverses any previously recognized unrealized gain/loss • Realized gain varies by investments and accounting basis DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 11 SAMPLE STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS Assets Investments Timberlands $ Investments in timberland joint ventures Total investments Cash and cash equivalents Other assets Total assets $ Liabilities Accrued expenses Accounts payable Deferred tax liability Total liabilities Net Assets $ 5,498,082 $ 9,032,674 41,413,979 40,886,012 46,912,061 49,918,686 1,553,359 68,007 3,016,360 101,132 53,036,178 48,533,427 $ 585,090 72,753 1,060,531 1,718,374 70,067 129,634 1,831,748 2,031,449 46,815,053 $51,004,729 DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 12 SAMPLE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS Revenue Timber sales Equity in income of joint ventures Interest income Other income Total revenue $ 1,523,685 77,612 1,601,297 $ 169,303 1,287,512 83,847 5,000 1,545,662 Expenses Depletion Harvesting expense Real estate and other taxes Property management Account management Professional fees and other Total expenses 76,818 552,708 84,460 713,986 150,757 13,714 10,069 31,919 776,605 125,188 1,108,252 Net investment income 887,311 437,410 Net realized gain Net proceeds received from sales of real estate investments Less: Cost basis of real estate investments sold Realized gain from sales of real estate investments Less: Reversal of previously recorded unrealized gain on sale Net (loss) gain realized from sales of real estate investments Realized gain on joint ventures Net realized gain 4,569,603 3,221,271 1,348,332 1,358,729 (10,397) 219,761 209,364 20,030,921 15,811,792 4,219,129 4,142,974 76,155 38,410 114,565 Unrealized gain on real estate investments held 8,181,980 6,869,007 Net increase in net assets resulting from operations $ 9,278,655 $ 7,420,982 DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 13 INVESTMENT COMPANY FINANCIAL REPORTING ISSUES • Schedule of Investments – Percent net assets for each category and total cost for each category – Disclose the name, value and type of each of the following: • Each investment constituting more than 5% of net assets DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 14 SAMPLE FOOTNOTE DISCLOSURES (FAIR VALUE POLICY) • In accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, the Partnership has established and documented processes and methodologies for determining the fair values of forestland investments on a recurring basis. This value is based on exchange prices in a hypothetical orderly transaction at the measurement date between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability in the market in which the reporting entity would transact for the asset or liability, this is, the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. • The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows: • Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. • • DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 15 SAMPLE FOOTNOTE DISCLOSURES (FAIR VALUE POLICY) • The Partnership invests primarily in diversified commercial forestlands for which quoted prices falling within the categories of Level 1 and Level 2 inputs are not available. Therefore, the Partnership values all of its investments at fair value, as determined in good faith by the General Partner (Level 3 inputs, as further described below). Due to the inherent uncertainty in the valuation process, the General Partner’s estimate of fair value may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had an active market existed, and as such, the differences could be material. In addition, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to be different than the valuations currently assigned. There is no single standard for determining fair value in good faith, as fair value depends upon circumstances of each individual investment. In general, fair value is the amount that the Partnership might reasonably expect to receive upon the current sale of the property. • For the period during which a forestland investment is acquired, it is initially recorded at the appraised value established by an independent third party appraisal. This valuation incorporates various methodologies including, but not limited to, the cost approach, income approach, and comparable sales approach. An independent appraiser will establish the reported forestland fair value at the end of every three-year cycle following acquisition. For periods between third party independent appraisals, the General Partner determines forestland investment fair value. Factors considered by the General Partner in determining the interim estimates of fair value include, among others, the following: the most recent appraised value, the growth of the timber, volumes of timber harvested, pricing changes in relevant timber markets, and adjustments to land values. DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 16 SAMPLE FOOTNOTE DISCLOSURES (UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS) DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 17 INVESTMENT COMPANY FINANCIAL REPORTING ISSUES • ASC 946 Financial Services-Investment Companies and AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide- Audits of Investment Companies require disclosure of financial highlights for the following: – Net investment income ratio – net investment income/average net assets – Expense ratio – total expenses/average net assets – Internal rate of return (IRR) – the implied discount rate calculated based on a series of cash flows and residual values as of the beginning and end of the investment period DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 18 INVESTMENT COMPANY FINANCIAL REPORTING ISSUES • Financial highlights – Ratios calculated for each class of investor (excluding the manager) – Net investment income ratio and expense ratio are calculated prior to the effects of any incentive allocation – If incentives are structured as fees, include in calculation of expense ratio – All incentives should be reflected in the disclosure of financial highlights to avoid inconsistencies in ratio presentations based solely on structuring of fees DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 19 SAMPLE FOOTNOTE DISCLOSURES (FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS) DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 20 INVESTMENT COMPANY ACCOUNTING • FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 provides a framework that clarifies the fair value measurement objective within GAAP and its application under the various pronouncements that require (or permit) fair value measurements. • Determining “fair value” – One likely reason for diversity in fair value methods is the varying nature of investments, which are both traditional and non-traditional. DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 21 INVESTMENT COMPANY VALUATION DRIVERS OF TIMBERLAND ASSETSLEVEL 3 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT • Timber Component: – Net biological growth- Biological growth of the timber resource including in-growth less harvest removals. – Timber price changes- Species pricing for the compositional makeup of the underlying timber resource. • Land Component: – Generally the CPI is used as a proxy for land value changes due primarily to the absence of any other significant measurement tool. CPI is often a basis for appraiser’s assumptions on valuation of the underlying dirt value. DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 22 HOW IS GROWTH RECOGNIZED? DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 23 Investment Company Measurement of Value Change-Timberland Property • Assumptions: 1. $10 Million Timberland Property at acquisition on December 31st 2012. 2. 30% allocated value to the land ($3M) and 70% to the timber resource ($7M). 3. Biological Growth including in-growth: 6% Annually 4. Annual Harvest Rate: 50% of net biological growth 5. 2013 Price Changes on a blended species basis: 8% 6. 2013 CPI: 3% DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 24 INVESTMENT COMPANY MEASUREMENT OF VALUE CHANGE-TIMBERLAND PROPERTY (CONTD.) • What is the value of this timberland property as of 12/31/2013? • Increase in value of the timber component is 3% for net biological growth which added $210,000 in value for the year. • With incremental timber volume resulting in the higher timber value and 8% for improved pricing throughout the year being applied, 2013 price changes added $576,800 in market value for the year. • The land component increased at the 3% inflation rate which added another $90,000 for the land. • The overall increase for the 2013 year would be $876,800. • The fair value of the timberland property as of 12/31/2013: $10,876,800. • 2013 Annual Rate of Appreciation for the Property is 8.77%. DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 25 INVESTMENT COMPANY FINANCIAL REPORTING ISSUES • IRR is required to be disclosed instead of total return as previously required under the guide if the following criteria are met by the investment company: – Have limited lives – Don’t continuously raise capital – Operating strategy is to return proceeds from dispositions to investors – Limited opportunities for investors to withdraw prior to termination of the entity – Acquiring market-traded securities and derivatives are not routine DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 26 WHAT IS A REIT? • Real estate investment trust (REIT) – a corporation, business trust or association that makes a tax election by filing form 1120-REIT after meeting the required criteria • REITs were created in 1960 by the US Congress to allow individual or smaller investors to participate in investing in real estate (a sort of real estate mutual fund) DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 27 REIT REQUIREMENT CRITERIA • • • • Organizational Operational Distribution Compliance DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 28 REIT – ORGANIZATIONAL REQUIREMENTS • Ownership: – Not closely held – must be owned by a minimum of 100 shareholders – No more than 50% of shares may be held by 5 or fewer individuals (5/50 Rule) • Structure: managed by a board (one or more trustees or directors) with freely transferable shares or certificates (public entity) DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 29 REIT – OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS • Quarterly asset test: at least 75% of the value of the REIT’s total assets represented by real estate assets (real property, mortgages on real property, CMBS, RMBS) • Annual income test: at least 75% of gross income derived from one or more sources, including rents from real property, mortgage interest or dividends/gains from REIT shares (good income vs. bad income) • Taxable REIT subsidiary (TRS): not more than 25% of the value of the REIT’s assets represented by one or more TRSs DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 30 REIT – DISTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS • Annual distribution test: during the taxable year must pay out (includes actual and certain deemed distributions) at least 90% of REIT taxable income to shareholders. May pay out 100% of REIT taxable income to avoid corporate level tax. DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 31 REIT – COMPLIANCE • Failure to meet these tests can result in penalties or disqualification, which may result in the REIT incurring corporate taxes or potentially losing REIT status DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 32 REIT-ADVANTAGES • Two Major Structural Advantages of the REIT: 1. Allows for the utilization of leverage without generating UBTI (unrelated business taxable income) for tax-exempt investors. This provides the potential for incremental returns. 2. Provides safe harbor rules for the disposition of real estate assets whereby a “facts and circumstances” test is applied in the partnership taxation arena. DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 33 REIT FINANCIAL REPORTING DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 34 REIT FINANCIAL REPORTING DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 35 REIT FINANCIAL REPORTING DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 36 REIT FINANCIAL REPORTING DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 37 THE REIT MARKET Home financing 8% Commercial financing 1% Timber 5% Office 10% Industrial 4% Office/ind mix 7% Health care 11% Shopping centers 7% Self-storage 6% Retail 13% Lodging/resorts 5% Diversified 7% Apartments 13% Manufactured homes 1% Free standing retail 2% Source: NAREIT DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 38 CASE OF BLUE DEVIL TIMO Considering the organization of a new investment vehicle. A couple of institutions have expressed an interest in establishing separate accounts with Blue Devil TIMO. Some of the existing investors have expressed interest in participating in a new fund. The Investment Committee has requested that you evaluate the proposed structural options of the new investment vehicle along with the financial reporting issues that may impact the selection of the type of fund investment vehicle to pursue. DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 39 BLUE DEVIL TIMO CASE TEMPLATE • First choice for new fund type-Separate Account vs. Commingled Fund? _____________ • Criteria drivers for this choice? – A. ___________________ – B. ___________________ – C. ___________________ • Accounting Method- Fair Value Reporting or Lower of Cost or Market? DUKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM // 2015 40