On Day 3, all candidates assume the same roles when answering a

CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 1
On Day 3, all candidates assume the same roles when answering a series of shorter
cases. Day 3 will be completed in four hours and will be made up of three to four cases.
It will provide candidates with the opportunity to demonstrate their competence in all of
the breadth areas and provide additional opportunities to demonstrate depth in Financial
Reporting or Management Accounting—the common elements. The degree of
complexity of the case facts and the level of critical thinking expected can be higher
than at the end of Core 1 and Core 2, since candidates’ skill level will have increased
significantly over the two year professional education program.
This is a second example for Day 3. A Full Day 3 is NOT provided here.
Question 1 (of 3 or 4)
(Suggested Time: 70 minutes)
(Coverage: Core 2: strategy and governance, Core 1: internal controls and taxation)
It is June 13, 2011. You, CPA, have known Jane Smith for many years. She has asked you to
meet with her parents to discuss the latest development at Boy and Girl Toys Inc. (BGT) —
what Jane has described as an amazing turn of events. Sally and Orland, Jane’s parents, are in
their mid-fifties and have jointly owned BGT since they took over the business from Sally’s
father several years ago.
At the meeting, Sally describes the opportunity that BGT is contemplating. “World Entertainment
Ltd. (WEL) is an international toy distribution and retail business. It is a publicly traded company
with its head office in Canada. WEL noticed the success we have been having locally with our
newest product, NanoPets. They approached us with a non-negotiable proposal to expand our
business by injecting some equity. WEL has made investments of this type before to help
capitalize on sales trends in the retail market. Here is a copy of WEL’s proposal (Appendix I). As
you know, I am the fourth-generation owner of BGT. We are proud of our achievements, but this
proposal could take us to a whole new level of business success.”
You inquire, “Do you have some idea of the amount of growth this opportunity entails?”
Sally provides a summary of the financial and production data agreed to as part of WEL’s
proposed investment in BGT (Appendix II). She comments, “We never thought we would run a
business that produces five million toys annually. That’s ten times what we produce now! It’s
incredibly exciting. We want to go ahead, but first we want to understand the tax implications of
bringing in a new shareholder. We’ve provided you with some summary tax information on BGT
(Appendix III). Orland and I each own 12,500 common voting shares that we purchased from
my father. At $60 per share, we would each receive $750,000 tax-free when we eventually sell
and claim the capital gains exemption, like Dad did, but I’m sure there are other tax
considerations.”
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 2
You ask what concerns, if any, they have with WEL’s offer and proposed expansion. Sally
answers, “Well, when the representative from WEL was here, he asked some questions about
internal controls and budgeting and variance analysis. Currently, Jane does all the bookkeeping
and handles all payments to suppliers and employees. She has never paid anyone late or had
any trouble with suppliers. The external accountant comes in every year for two weeks and
prepares BGT’s financial statements and the tax returns. We’ve never had a problem. We’ve
always run our business on handshakes and trust, so we were a little taken aback by the WEL
representative’s questions. We are sure that once WEL’s management sees us in action they’ll
be fine with what we do and how we do it. Then again, BGT is not a multinational company like
WEL, so maybe their questions are valid. Could you recommend the internal controls we’ll need
if we accept the proposal? We will have to hire some new employees, as you can see from the
proposal, and we may not be able to monitor everything. Jane has already mentioned that she
will need some help in the office too. She has prepared some notes on our current situation and
how she thinks it might change (Appendix IV).
“We would also like your observations, a kind of sober second thought, on the proposed
business expansion, with an emphasis on any risks you see that we may not have identified or
fully explored.”
After the meeting, Jane walks you out. She comments, “I think Mom really wants to do this deal.
I guess it could be a big opportunity and could make us rich. But I’m not sure this is the way
Grandpa would have wanted it to go. BGT has been in the family forever. I was hoping Mom
would realize that I have worked hard and stayed here through everything thinking I would be
next in line. Anyway, I hope it all works out.”
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 3
APPENDIX I
PROPOSAL MADE BY WORLD ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED
TO BOY AND GIRL TOYS INC.
WEL’s non-negotiable proposal includes investing up to $9 million over a two-year period to
fund expansion of the NanoPets line of toys.


The initial investment of $1.8 million will be for 30,000 newly issued common voting shares
of BGT at a price of $60 per share.
WEL will have an option to purchase an additional 120,000 shares, at $60 per share, for
$7.2 million.
WEL will be authorized to appoint at least three seats on the board of directors of BGT, and the
board of directors will have no more than five members in total.
BGT will produce quarterly financial statements for WEL’s internal management purposes.
Sally and Orland will be guaranteed their current positions and salaries at BGT for a period of
one year from the initial investment by WEL.
BGT agrees to hire a marketing vice-president within three months of accepting the proposal to
handle customer relationships and marketing functions.
BGT agrees to hire a distribution manager within three months of accepting the proposal to
assist in distribution to customers.
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 4
APPENDIX II
BOY AND GIRL TOYS INC.
FINANCIAL AND PRODUCTION DATA
BGT’s current production capacity is 500,000 toys annually. BGT started producing NanoPets in
early March 2011, and has produced and sold 40,000 NanoPets in three months.
With a $3 million expansion, BGT could increase production to two million toys annually. The
expansion would be funded with $1.5 million from WEL and $1.5 million from BGT’s bank.
WEL guarantees a minimum purchase of 50,000 NanoPets in calendar 2011 to sell in its
corporate-owned retail stores. WEL is planning to expand the number of stores it owns in 2012,
at which point the minimum guaranteed purchase amount will be increased. The purchase price
to be paid by WEL will be at a discount of 5% from the lowest price offered by BGT to any
competing customer.
The first phase of expansion would be complete in September 2011, with NanoPets production
gradually increasing by the end of September in time for the Christmas shopping season.
If the 2011 sales are strong, additional expansion will occur beginning in January 2012, such
that production capacity reaches five million toys by June 2012.
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 5
APPENDIX III
BOY AND GIRL TOYS INC.
TAX INFORMATION
December 31, 2010 Fiscal Year End
Taxable income
$
450,000
Taxes payable before credits (11%)
49,500
Scientific research and experimental
development:
Investment tax credit for developing
NanoPet technology
($200,000 × 35%)
70,000
Net federal tax refund
20,500
December 31, 2010 retained earnings
1,100,000
Dividend paid 2010
150,000
Capital loss carry-forward
30,000
May 31, 2011 (Five-Month Period)
Estimated taxable income
Estimated scientific research and experimental
development:
Investment tax credit
($100,000 × 35%)
Estimated May 31, 2011 retained earnings
Anticipated dividend
$
250,000
35,000
1,335,000
70,000
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 6
APPENDIX IV
NOTES ON PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES
(PREPARED BY JANE)
My mom is BGT’s president, and handles all the relationships with customers. My dad is the
vice-president of production and is in charge of research, production, distribution, and employee
and supplier relationships. I handle administrative duties, including performing basic
bookkeeping functions and working with BGT’s external accountant, who produces BGT’s
financial statements under a compilation engagement and prepares BGT’s tax return.
All pricing decisions are made by my mom in consultation with my dad. My dad estimates the
production costs based on his experience, and then my mom decides what a reasonable margin
is based on her knowledge of the market and what customers are willing to pay. Most customer
contracts are verbal. We have never had collection problems with any customer.
The new marketing vice-president will take over pricing for all customers, including ensuring
compliance with the agreement to provide a 5% price discount to WEL. The WEL representative
wants the new marketing person to focus on maximizing our sales to use up our new production
capacity.
We pay our suppliers on receipt of invoice. My dad handles the negotiations with all major
suppliers for production machinery and raw materials, and takes care of distribution to
customers. We spend small amounts on office supplies and other overheads like insurance. We
own our facilities.
The new distribution manager will take on the function of shipping the toys to our customers. He
or she will also be in charge of related functions, including receiving returns of damaged or
unsold goods, processing change orders from customers, and leasing a new warehouse as we
expand our markets.
All hiring is currently done by my dad because he knows what skills are needed for production
and research. He was Grandpa’s right-hand man before Grandpa passed the business on to my
parents. He tells me when a new employee has been hired, and I make sure I collect the
information needed for payroll, like Social Insurance Number, home address, etc. My dad
determines pay rates based on experience and the market. If I give up some of the office duties,
he may have to communicate with the new office staff on payroll matters. I think the new
marketing vice-president and distribution manager will determine pay rates and hours of work
for the employees working in their areas.
The people at WEL want these two positions to be filled quickly because they think we need to
move fast to take full advantage of the trendy product we have developed. My parents and I
have signing authority over the bank accounts, so it only makes sense that the new hires would
have that authority as well.
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 7
APPENDIX IV (continued)
NOTES ON PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES
(PREPARED BY JANE)
Every year, after the external accountant has prepared the draft financial statements and tax
returns, my mom and I meet to determine the amounts of wages and dividends we can afford to
pay based on our financial results. My dad doesn’t attend the meetings where we go over the
detailed financial data because he knows the numbers through his experience and personal
involvement on the costing side. He prefers to spend his time on the factory floor.
We have had several applications for administrative jobs, so I should have no problem finding
someone to help in the office. I’m not sure we will need a full-time person, but it would be nice to
be able to hand off some of the more routine tasks like invoicing, adding suppliers, making
deposits, and writing cheques.
I would then be able to focus on getting a better handle on how to use our software to produce
and print reports like the ones the WEL representative was talking about.
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 8
MARKING GUIDE
BOY AND GIRL TOYS INC. (BGT)
Memorandum to:
From:
Re:
Sally and Orland Smith
CPA
Proposal from WEL to invest in Boy and Girl Toys Inc. (BGT)
You have asked me for advice with respect to the proposal from WEL to invest in BGT. In
particular, you want to understand the tax implications of bringing in a new shareholder, and you
have asked me to provide recommendations of internal controls that you would need if you go
forward with the proposal from WEL. I have provided the information you requested below.
In addition, you also asked for my comments, a kind of sober second thought, on the proposed
business expansion, with an emphasis on any risks I see that you may not have identified or
fully explored. I have included my thoughts on the proposed WEL investment and expanded
operations of BGT. However, it is ultimately your decision whether to proceed. I have tried to
highlight the most important considerations so that you can make an informed decision about
this non-negotiable deal.
Regards,
CPA
Assessment Opportunity #1
The candidate discusses the taxation issues related to the acquisition of control and change in
status.
The candidate is demonstrating competence in Core 1-Taxation competency area.
CPA Map:
6.1.1 Assesses a corporate entity’s general tax issues (Core- Level B)
6.1.4 Advises on tax consequences or specific tax-planning opportunities for shareholders and their closely held
corporations (Core Level C)
6.1.5 Analyzes the tax consequences or planning opportunities for complex corporate transactions (Core- Level C)
Also touches 2.3.2 evaluates the entity’s internal and external environment and its impact on strategy development (CoreLevel B)
Acquisition of Control
The transaction as proposed will result in WEL acquiring 30,000 shares, and BGT will have
55,000 shares outstanding at that point in time. WEL will control BGT because it will have more
than 50% of the voting shares. Because of this, the acquisition of control rules will apply.
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 9
Deemed Year End
The consequences of an acquisition of control are that BGT will have a deemed year end, for
tax purposes, on the day preceding the date of the acquisition of control. This will cause a short
year for income tax purposes, requiring a pro-ration of certain amounts based on the number of
days in the year. One impact will be on the small business deduction (SBD) limit. BGT gets a
reduction in its tax rate from 16.5% to 11.0% on earnings under the business limit. The business
limit is pro-rated for short tax years, so, for example, if the transaction closes on June 30, the
business limit will be about $250,000 (half of the usual $500,000 allowed).
Note: candidates are expected to demonstrate Level C- they are expected to explain an dapply
the basic knowledge in a routine, non-complex situation, which BGT is. The following paragraph
would be beyond the expectations:
Since BGT has earned $250,000 to date this year (based on your May 31 estimate), it looks like
this will mean that some of its income will be taxed at the high corporate rate. Capital cost
allowance (CCA) claims are also pro-rated for the short taxation year, so if BGT’s taxable
income estimate claimed full CCA, that will need to be adjusted.
Capital Losses
There are capital losses of $30,000 noted as carried-forward in the December 2010 tax
information. Since they are capital in nature, they would be lost on WEL’s acquisition of control.
The company can make an election on capital property to trigger capital gains that may have
accrued in order to use the capital losses before they are lost. Because the company owns its
own facilities, it is possible that the value of the land has increased over its original purchase
price and unrealized capital gains exist.
Other Matters
Immediately before an acquisition of control, capital property, depreciable property, and eligible
capital property with inherent losses must be written down to their fair market value. Realizing
losses on the depreciable property and eligible capital property will create non-capital losses to
the extent that there isn’t sufficient income to offset the losses. Losses on the capital property
will increase the capital loss carryforward, which will be added to the existing $30,000 balance
and will be lost on the acquisition of control.
Non-capital losses (if they arise under the above revaluation) can be carried forward, provided
BGT is carrying on the same or similar business, which it will be. The losses would be affected
by the deemed year end. One year would be lost on the carry-forward period for the non-capital
losses.
BGT should review its other assets (including assessing the fair market value of accounts
receivable) to see whether there are losses that will be triggered as part of the transaction and
to consider if there are any capital gains that it could trigger in order to use up the losses before
they are lost.
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 10
Change in Status
CCPC versus Public Corporation
Since WEL is a public corporation, BGT will no longer qualify as a Canadian-controlled private
corporation (CCPC) for tax purposes after the shares are issued to WEL and it acquires control.
Being a non-CCPC will mean that BGT will not be allowed to claim a small business deduction
after the date of the transaction and its tax payable will increase.
We noted that BGT claims investment tax credits for scientific research and experimental
development (SR&ED). Since it will no longer be a CCPC, it will have a different rate (20%
versus 35%) applied to its qualifying spending for SR&ED purposes, and the credit will no
longer be refundable to the extent that it eliminates the federal income tax payable. So, for
example, the refund of tax received for 2010 would not be refundable, and the SR&ED credit
exceeding the $49,500 of income tax would have been carried forward to offset future years’
taxes payable. In addition, the company will now have to pay its outstanding corporation income
tax balance one month earlier (in other words, two months after year end rather than the threemonth period that is available to CCPCs).
Prior to the change in status, and to the extent that it may be applicable, BGT should clear its
capital dividend account and its refundable dividend tax on hand, because only private
corporations can pay capital dividends or receive dividend refunds. These accounts will be
affected by any capital gains that may be triggered as part of the plan to use capital losses that
will otherwise expire (see the previous discussion on losses).
Dividends
We noticed that you pay substantial dividends on a regular basis. You should be aware of the
fact that the nature of the dividends may change if you go from being a CCPC to a non-CCPC
(the reference is Section 89(1) of ITA). There are separate sets of rules to follow for dividends,
depending on whether the payer is a CCPC or not.
Beyond expectation: The rules for CCPCs involve an annual calculation of the general rate
income pool (GRIP). The GRIP is determined by a formula, but essentially consists of the
company’s after-tax active business income that did not benefit from the small business
deduction. A CCPC that pays any dividend can designate it as an eligible dividend, and that
dividend would reduce the GRIP balance. Eligible dividends are subject to a lower personal
effective tax rate than those not paid out of the GRIP.
Beyond expectation: When the corporation is no longer a CCPC, it will be required to compute a
low-rate income pool account (LRIP). Future dividends are considered to be paid out of the
LRIP account until the account is fully depleted. Then, dividends can be paid as eligible
dividends with the same tax effect as noted under GRIP.
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 11
In terms of the proposed deal, it sounds like you are guaranteed the salary you currently make
for one year. There is no indication of whether you will still receive dividends. You should be
aware of the fact that the receipt of dividends has a more preferential tax treatment for an
individual than employment income does (see the discussion of alternatives later in this report).
Capital Gains Exemption
The matter of greatest concern to you is that your shares will no longer qualify for the capital
gains exemption (CGE), since you seem to believe they will. (This observation is based on your
comment that the value of the shares would be $750,000 each, and that you could receive that
value tax-free when you finally sell out and claim the CGE, as your dad did).
The current value of $1.5 million based on the price (assumed to be the fair value) of $60 per
share, less what you paid, would usually qualify for an exemption from tax. However, the rules
for the exemption require that the corporation be a CCPC at the time of the disposition. Since
you would be selling your shares after BGT is no longer a CCPC, the shares would no longer
meet the requirements for a qualifying small business corporation, so you would be able to
claim the CGE.
Prior to the acquisition by WEL, you should take steps to crystallize your CGE to retain the taxfree status on the first $1.5 million of the gain on those shares prior to losing eligibility. For
example, the shareholders can file an election as described under Section 48.1 of the Income
Tax Act or undertake a corporate restructuring (such as a Section 85(1) rollover) in order to
crystallize the gain.
Other: Non-arm’s Length Transactions
The future sales of 50,000 NanoPets to WEL (at a 5% discount from the lowest price offered by
BGT to any competing customer) will have to be revalued to fair market for tax purposes since
the two companies are not dealing at arm’s length with each other.
Assessment Opportunity #2
The candidate discusses improvements to the control environment considering WEL’s proposal.
The candidate is demonstrating competence in Core 1-Assurance competency area (controls).
CPA Mapping:
4.1.1 Assesses the entity’s risk assessment processes (Core- Level A)
4.1.2 Evaluates the information system, including the related processes (Core- Level B)
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 12
WEL is a publicly traded company. It must therefore meet certain reporting requirements, one of
which includes a sign-off on the satisfactory functioning of the internal controls regarding the
production of financial statement information. WEL’s concern over internal controls is therefore
valid. We don’t know the relative size and importance of BGT to WEL’s overall operations. If
significant, what BGT does will influence WEL’s reporting. This may explain why the
representative from WEL was asking questions about your controls.
However, even without this reason, you need to consider the impact of introducing “outsiders” to
your family-owned–and-operated business. The purpose of having adequate and appropriate
internal controls is to ensure that you have safeguard your assets (cash, capital assets,
inventory, etc.), that your payments are made to vendors and employees who actually provided
value to your company, and that you invoice your customers appropriately and collect payment.
One of the purposes of internal controls is to protect against fraud and error, and another is to
protect you from loss due to damage and accident.
Each process in your company should be reviewed to make sure that you have adequate
controls in place. This will be somewhat time-consuming. BGT will not need to have controls as
robust as those of a multinational business, since the company is small, but you do need to take
adequate steps to protect against various risks, some of which will be new risks to BGT. BGT
will no longer be a small family business, where you have the ability to fully trust all those who
have access to bank accounts, financial records, and other valuable assets. You must consider
how best to protect BGT’s assets.
Review and Follow-up
As you grow, your attention to budgeting and variance analysis will need to increase. Your
business will no longer be small enough that Orland will be able to instinctively determine
production costs and product margins. As you can understand, if you are producing ten times as
many toys as you currently produce, a small change in margin due to increased production
costs or raw material price changes will have a much larger impact than it has today, so there is
greater risk of financial difficulties being created by short-term problems.
Part of the agreement includes guaranteeing WEL a price that is 5% lower than that offered to
anyone else. You will need to monitor the impact of this discount on your margins, because you
still want the reduced sales price to cover your costs of production and marketing, as well as
contribute towards covering other business costs.
Since you will hire new employees to market and distribute the product, you will not have
firsthand knowledge of the pricing and costs, the way you do today. You will want to generate
reports frequently from your accounting system to be able to monitor costs, pricing, and margins
so that you can ensure that BGT continues to make a profit. You will want something to
compare the costs to as a benchmark, so you should prepare a budget, watch for when the
costs vary from budget, and then follow up on variances to get explanations to ensure that they
are appropriate.
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 13
WEL requires quarterly financial statements be prepared for internal purposes. I recommend
that a rolling quarterly and annual budget be prepared. These budgets should reflect the
expectations of capacity increases, new or lost business, market conditions, new capital
expenditures, and production. Each quarter, these budgets should be compared to actual
results. Significant variances or unusual patterns should be investigated by the appropriate
person. You will need to make sure your accounting software and reporting package can
generate the financial and management reports you need. Jane mentioned wanting time to get
to know what reports the accounting system is able to produce. This is a good idea. It will be
important to know whether the current accounting system is able to produce the reports you will
need. If not, you may need to buy a new accounting system.
You mention that BGT currently pays all suppliers on receipt of an invoice. You may want to reevaluate this decision and only pay immediately those suppliers that provide a discount for early
payment. Your accounting system should be able to schedule the payments on the most
efficient or beneficial schedule, since you will likely now be in a position to want to manage your
cash to ensure your loan payments are not jeopardized in any way.
Many people will likely be ordering products and materials, and information about the orders
should be recorded on a bill of order or request for product, kept in the office, and then
reconciled against deliveries when they are made to the warehouse. This way there can be a
reconciliation of products ordered and received. The amounts should also be reconciled with
accounts payable.
Similarly, a formal process should be put in place for accounts receivable since Sally and the
marketing vice-president will be sharing duties. All sales, returns, and order changes will be
handled by that team and then passed along to the shipping department. The records of
shipments out of the department could then be reconciled with the back office invoices and
orders to ensure completeness and occurrence of sales and that only authorized transactions
are processed.
Segregation of Duties
The assistant that will be hired to help Jane in the office should be adequately trained and
supervised. His or her work should be reviewed for accuracy. For example, if vendor invoices
are input and cheques generated for payment by this person, someone else should review the
cheques and ensure they match the invoices prior to signing. The person who inputs vendor
invoices should not have the ability to add new vendors. These are examples of internal
“segregation of duty” controls. The same concept would apply to invoicing your customers and
paying your employees. The duties of receiving and deposit cash should be separate from
billing, and of the duty of preparing the payroll should be separate from signing payroll cheques
and adding new employees. As you grow, this will become increasingly important because you
will get to the point where you may not personally know all your employees or be able to sign
each cheque personally.
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 14
On the shipping, receiving, and warehousing side, you should ensure that the duties of shipping
are separate from the duties of receiving damaged or returned goods. Otherwise, it is possible
for someone to make an error or commit fraud on the shipping documents to hide what are
made to look like returns without the goods actually being returned. Now that you will no longer
be in charge of all customer and supplier relationships, the risk of this type of behaviour
increases.
Authorization Limits
You mention giving signing authority to both the new vice-president and the new manager. You
should consider whether signing authority should be granted at the manager level. You may
wish to restrict the granting of this privilege to the most senior level employees, likely vicepresident and higher.
You should ensure that there are limits to the amount of authority anyone with signing authority
has, since they are committing the corporation to financial transactions and agreements. If
managers are granted signing authority, it should be for relatively small amounts at first;
perhaps just a corporate credit card with a small limit to cover travel and entertainment
expenses.
You should establish policies and procedures regarding pricing that take into account not only
volume considerations, but also ensure that you maintain adequate margins (so that costs of
production and marketing are covered, as well as contributing to other business expenses).
Floor pricing should be set for each product and should be tied to the size of the customer’s
potential and the size of the order. These types of limits would apply at all levels, to anyone with
signing authority.
You noted that the new vice-president and manager will hire their own employees and set their
wage rates. Once again, you should consider whether the manager level should have this much
authority or whether it should be restricted to the vice-president level or higher. You should set
some parameters for the wage ranges they would be allowed to use when hiring, as well as the
range for wage increases, to ensure the wages are reasonable compared to the marketplace.
Proper Documentation and Approval Processes
If you proceed with the proposal from WEL, you will want to put processes in place to have
formally signed contracts with your suppliers and customers. Handshakes work when you have
a limited number of relationships that you can be personally involved in.
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 15
Now that you are hiring people (such as the marketing vice-president and the distribution
manager) to develop new relationships and take over functions that you currently undertake,
you will want to ensure that the discussions and agreements that they enter into are adequately
documented in a written agreement. For example, verbal contracts with past customers (despite
no collection problems) will now have to be formalized and in written format, so that in the event
of disputes, the terms and conditions are supportable by signed agreements. In addition, BGT
should have a credit approval process in place to limit credit risks from customers, as well as a
developed pricing policy. Also, you will want to have some sort of approval process in place so
that your employees cannot enter into bad deals that put you at risk of loss.
You mention that the new vice-president and manager will hire their own employees; however,
you should consider whether the manager level should have this level of authority or whether it
should be restricted to the vice-president level or higher. You should have an approval process
in place for the hiring of employees — perhaps all proposed new hires need to be reviewed and
approved at a senior level before the job offer is made to ensure that responsible persons with
the appropriate job capabilities are selected for each position. Similar review and oversight
processes might also apply to letting employees go.
Since WEL will have significant representation on the board of directors, maintaining the
minutes of board meetings is important, so that business decisions are documented.
Access Controls
You will want to set up other access controls; specifically, you will want to have the appropriate
people in appropriate work places, and keep doors that should be locked actually locked. As the
value of your inventory grows, your potential loss from theft will be greater. You will also need
access controls over your IT systems. You will want to have passwords for access to accounting
records so that unauthorized persons cannot go in and change the numbers to hide errors or
theft. You will especially want to restrict access to banking and loan records and to any online
banking information.
Access controls should be in place so that shippers cannot access inventory reconciliation
records or goods return records, nor should they be able to adjust invoices.
Fixed Asset Controls
As you hire more employees, you will also likely be buying office equipment, furniture,
computers, and peripherals for them. You will likely want to keep control of these assets — to
know who has them and where they are — more so than when it was just family members who
used these types of assets. Since they are easily stolen, you will want to put controls in place to
ensure you can track these assets. You may want to use a fixed asset ledger system and
assign asset numbers to all of BGT’s fixed assets. This makes tracking the cost of acquisitions
and disposals much easier.
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 16
Assessment Opportunity #3
The candidate discusses the risks related to WEL’s proposal.
The candidate is demonstrating competence in Core 2- Performance Management
CPA Mapping:
2.1.1 Evaluates the entity’s governance structure (policies, processes, codes) (Core- Level B)
2.2.1 Assesses whether management decisions align with the entity’s mission, vision, and values (Core- Level B)
2.3.3 Evaluates strategic alternatives (Core- Level B)
2.4.1 Analyzes the key operational issues and alignment with strategy (Core- Level B)
It appears that you have identified most of the potential benefits of the deal. You have asked me
to comment on the risks of the business expansion that you may not have identified. We would
like to highlight the following risks that you may not have considered.
Loss of Control
First, you have alluded to, but may not have fully considered, the implications of the loss of
control. Currently, Sally and Orland are the only two shareholders of BGT. You can currently set
policy; determine whom to hire, fire, and do business with; and make any decision that is related
to the business.
If you conclude the transaction with WEL, you will no longer have complete control. In fact, with
a majority of the shares and a majority of the members of the board of directors, WEL will
control BGT. Through its control, WEL will have the final say in all the policy and business
decisions that you now currently control. WEL is a public company and likely has different
pressures put on it by its shareholders, which could have an impact on the decisions it makes at
BGT, depending on the significance of BGT to WEL’s overall operations.
Culture
WEL’s involvement in the business will likely change the culture of the company completely. It
can determine the way the business is run, through its voting power, and veto any “family”
decisions. Decisions that affect the policies and strategy-setting will no longer be discussed
around the kitchen table. With the addition of WEL personnel on your board, the board meetings
will likely become more frequent and formal, requiring proper motions, minutes, agendas, and
notices of meeting dates, for instance.
Your management structure is also going to change. The new vice-president and manager
being hired will have influence over decision-making since they are in management roles. Sally,
you will continue to be the president of the corporation, but you will not be able to operate the
corporation without consultation and compromise. Currently, you and Orland work together to
make decisions, and have a strong working relationship with your suppliers and customers
based on the fact that you often do business on a hand-shake. There may be a significant
impact on the operating culture, which could directly affect the employees of BGT.
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 17
You also need to consider the next generation of your family — preserving the history of the
family-owned business into its fourth generation. It appears that Jane wanted the corporation to
become hers some day. I understand that she has worked hard for you. She might have to
consider finding something else to do to replace the type of income and capital growth that she
was expecting from BGT, depending on her role in the future of BGT.
Job Security
The agreement also does not include a commitment to you personally, beyond guaranteeing a
job and your current salary for one year. Having only one year of guaranteed employment is a
risk to you since WEL will have the power to vote in new management if they believe you are
not successful after one year. In addition, the fact that a marketing vice-president and
distribution manager will be hired within the next three months (and presumably trained by the
two of you) may be a cause for concern, since you are essentially hiring (and potentially
training) staff who could replace you.
You should ensure that you obtain an idea of what WEL expects in terms of results from BGT so
that you can determine if the expectations are reasonable. You can then determine the exact
risk of the loss of your jobs. Assuming you keep your jobs, there is no guarantee that you will be
able to draw the current dividends of $150,000 per year (from 2010 info), so while your salary
might be maintained, you will not have the same cash flow that you are currently drawing from
BGT. Since you will no longer have the majority of share ownership or control over the board of
directors, you will have little ability to influence the dividend decision. The terms should be
discussed and formalized. You should also discuss with WEL the terms of your compensation
arrangements, so that you may have an opportunity to share in profit through a profit-sharing
plan, in addition to your share ownership.
Financial Considerations
The potential dilution of your ownership interest is to 25,000 of a total of 175,000 shares, or
approximately 14%. You are currently making $450,000 profit annually, based on 2010 results,
plus the salaries that you are drawing for family members.
Your share of BGT is arguably worth $1.5 million ($60 × 25,000 shares currently outstanding) as
it stands, based on the price offered by WEL. However, you will need to assess whether the
$60-per-share price offered by WEL represents fair value. For the purposes of our discussion,
we will use $60. You should assess whether $60 is a fair price. (Our firm could assist you in this
matter.)
Let us say that you are successful in growing tenfold. You will arguably have profit of $4.5
million, but you will own 14%, rather than 100%, of the company. If your share of the company,
with a profit of $450,000 per year, is worth $1.5 million, then perhaps the company will grow
tenfold to be worth $15.0 million. At 14%, your share could have a value of $2.1 million. Your
value will have increased $600,000. The question you need to ask is if that is worth the risk.
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 18
Assuming the price per share seems fair, the equity valuation of $1.5 million is $165,000 above
the book value of your equity today. However, you are taking on more debt and the company is
more highly leveraged; therefore, the general risk related to holding debt goes up with this deal.
We noted a couple of things in the documents you provided to us that we thought we should
bring to your attention. WEL’s commitment to purchasing NanoPets is fairly limited, with only
50,000 units committed to this year, out of a production capacity of 2 million. While it appears
that WEL intends to purchase a larger number of units once it expands, it has made a relatively
small commitment, which will result in a stranded investment if you do not sell enough toys to
make up for the substantial increase in volume (you currently produce only 40,000 units). You
should consider how financially strong the backing from WEL actually is —perhaps review its
financial position — to ensure that it will fulfill its commitments.
WEL is committing $1.5 million of the equity investment required. With the additional $1.5 million
of funding coming from the bank, if your expansion is not successful and you fall back to your
traditional volume and profitability, your ability to pay off that large of a bank loan may be
affected. Also, there is no guarantee on the value of your shares. While they are notionally
worth $60 per share, because that is the purchase price for WEL, you are not cashing out, and if
the business does not grow as you expect, your shares will be worthless. That is the risk, which
should be balanced against the reward of significant growth that would possibly result in
increased share value if you are successful in selling at capacity. You need to consider the
market risks (discussed below), in conjunction with this point.
Another factor to consider is the absence of an exit strategy for you in the current proposal. In
effect, you are giving up a significant portion of your business with no immediate benefit to you
(in other words, no cash in your pocket at the current time) and with no ability to control the
future of the business.
Part of the agreement includes guaranteeing WEL a unit price that is 5% lower than that paid by
anyone else. Your margins could be eroded by the discount. The impact might depend on
whether your production costs decline with the increased volumes being produced.
Market Risks
Further to the risks affecting product sales, there is some risk that the popularity of NanoPets
may be fleeting. The WEL representative referred to the product as “trendy.” If it is in fact a fad
toy, you will want to develop another product to replace it, and it will need to be a product that
can attract the same type of popularity as NanoPets seems to be currently enjoying if you are
going to get a return on your large capital investment.
There is some risk that the financial and growth projections are too aggressive. There will be
logistical issues to producing, distributing, and selling the volumes given that the average sales
of NanoPets are only 13,000 per month. There is a chance that this will become a world-wide
phenomenon, but at the same time there is some risk it will not take off. Not only would the
investment be stranded, but the company could be bankrupted, with a total loss to you. To the
extent possible, when projecting sales volumes, you should ensure that there is strong support
for the volumes to be produced.
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 19
Size and Rate of Expansion of Building and Operations
You will be ramping up the business very quickly. Are you sure you will be able to handle the
large increase in volume of business, in terms of your operations and back-office support? The
addition of new employees will help, but you need to consider the large amount of growth you
are suggesting and plan for it properly before proceeding. In addition, the deadline to complete
the first phase of the expansion (September 2011) is tight.
You need to consider the fact that BGT is obtaining bank financing for its share of the capital
expansion required. There is no mention in the agreement of the type of support WEL will
provide should there be any delays in construction, increase in costs of equipment, and similar
expenses. It is not uncommon for there to be delays that often result in increased construction
costs. Is BGT expected to bear any additional costs that may be incurred? You may wish to
clarify what WEL’s commitment will be should there be any delays or increased costs, to ensure
that BGT isn’t solely on the hook.
Another type of risk mitigation that you are likely already employing is the use of adequate and
appropriate insurance for your assets and operations for protection from the risk of theft, loss, or
damage. Since you are growing, your insurance coverage (both for physical assets and
business interruption) should likely be expanded.
We are not trying to indicate that we think the WEL proposal is unfair in any way. These are just
additional considerations we believe you should take into account when considering the offer.
Alternatives
Although the agreement itself is non-negotiable, perhaps WEL would be open to a partial cashout for you. Maybe it would purchase half of your current shareholdings so that you at least
have some cash not at risk if the business does not expand as desired. This limits your upside
potential, but also your downside risk, and would be prudent if your assets outside your
investment in BGT are not enough to fund your retirement.
Another alternative is to enter into a distributor agreement with WEL and grow slowly into the
NanoPets market, rather than ramping up as quickly as they have suggested. This would allow
you to retain control of your company while still perhaps taking advantage of WEL’s international
market reach, and its experienced and professional management with connections in the
international business community.
There are some risks in the current agreement (for example, your salaries are only guaranteed
for one year, and you are limited to two seats on the board) that could perhaps be addressed
through a separate shareholders’ agreement. Having a formal shareholders’ agreement in place
would help protect you from being “pushed out” by WEL.
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
CPA Final Common Exam - Day 3 Example
Page 20
We have one final suggestion for your consideration. Rather than entering into an agreement
with WEL at all, you may want to consider how you could go about expanding BGT in other
ways. You appear to have run your business quite successfully. Perhaps a growth strategy, with
the assistance of bank financing, is a feasible alternative.
If any of the above alternatives appeal to you, we can discuss them further.
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA, CPA CANADA, CPA.
© 2014, Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. All Rights Reserved.