Transformations Summary Notes: Hamlet/Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead Theme Context Appearance vs. Reality and Acting Play Within A PlayMetatheatre Hamlet Paradigm shift between religious and the enlightenment/humanist movement Revenge tragedy, written by Shakespeare in the 1600’s. Canonical. Historians believe there was a play similar to Hamlet written prior to Shakespeare’s called Amleth. Only fragments remain, so we are not sure how much of the story is “borrowed” Ros and Guil Paradigm shift between modernism and postmodernist/existentialism Theatre of the Absurd, written by Tom Stoppard in the 1960’s Acting and real life blurred, exits in Hamlet are entries in Ros and Guil. Acting in order to deceive: Hamlet play mad, Ophelia acts not in love, King acts innocent and Ros and Guil pretend to be friends We do not know just how much the Queen is acting- did she play a part in her husbands murder? Acting out a social role: Hamlet as Prince of Denmark as well as revenger Quote: “Seems madam? Nay, it is. I know not seems”- Hamlet to the Queen. Irony: Stage death more believable than real death: “He just wasn’t convincing”- The Player Irony that the Players have a better sense of identity than Ros and Guil, even though they act out other characters as well Quote: “To be tricked out of the single assumption that makes our existence viable- that someone is watching”- The Player highlighting the importance of an audience. Also questions that if God does not exist, and there is no-one watching us, who can judge us or know us at all? Murder of Gonzago (The Mouse Trap) pivotal in determining the King’s guilt, only see half the play Draws attention to the fact that Hamlet is a play- self-reflexivity We see the full rehearsal for Murder Of Gonzago. Ros and Guil see their fates being played out in front of their eyes, but are oblivious to it: dramatic irony. Death Death is insignificant Death is just “someone failing to reappear” Chance plays a large role, what if Hamlet had not killed Polonius, would Ophelia have gone mad, would Laertes conspire with the King to have Hamlet killed? Hamlet accepts his destiny that death is inevitable Quote: “Providence in the fall of a sparrow”Hamlet Title of play shows fate is death, although Stoppard gives them their own story, it is still bound by the lines of Hamlet. Fate and Destiny Character Portrayal Language Features Death is dramatic, Hamlet questions what death is like: existential thought Christian values highlighted with Ophelia’s death: suicide is non-Christian Hamlet is philosophical, humanist, procrastinator Ros and Guil as dimensionless, sponges, disloyal, interchangeable Focuses on the monarchy, important people Marginalises the common people Shakespeare uses soliloquies, irony, allusion, verse and prose Quote: “What a piece of work is man, how noble in reason, how infinite in faculties”- Hamlet questioning humanity, the existence of God and the purpose of life. Quote: “There must have been a moment at the beginning, where we could have said no…. Well we’ll know better next time”- But Stoppard’s play was their second chance. Hamlet as insane, irrational Ros and Guil have their own personalities, naïve, just innocent people caught up in the intrigues of royalty Focuses on “The Other”, Ros and Guil as “anti heroes” Quote: “We are little men, we don’t know the inns and outs of the matter” Stoppard utilises word games, colloquial phrases and allusions. Quotes: Paradox “Act natural” Pun: “The toenails on the other hand” Self-reflexivity: “I’d prefer art to mirror life” Biblical allusions: “Give us this day our daily mask” Dramatic Irony: “England. That’s a dead end”