Below is the Amended Complaint for the timely filed June 15, 2013 Complaint against the below
listed individuals at the U.S. Department of Justice, The Judicial Qualifications Commission, The State of
Georgia Employees, The State Bar of Georgia, the Board of Court Reporting and the Georgia Department
of Early Care and Learning Bright from the Start Program. As I was incarcerated from June 14, 2013 to
June 24, 2013 (EXHIBIT DS), other individuals stepped forward to write the Complaint on my behalf but
they inadvertently omitted key components of the Complaint. In as much, below, please find the
additional information to consider along with the timely filed June 15, 2013 Complaint, which is also filed
timely on June 28, 2013 as I was released from Jail on June 24, 2013 (EXHIBIT DS) per the Fulton
County Sherrif’s Office Proof of Incarceration Letter.
Carl J. Willis, II vs. Kimberly S. Willis and Reunion Place Subdivision vs. Kimberly T. Spence
Superior Court 2009CV165814, 2010 CV165814, 2011CV205975, 2013CV231662  Appeals Court
A10D0402  Supreme Court of Georgia S10F1357 (S10D0861), S10F1358 (S10D0949) and S10C1648 
United States Court of Appeals- Eleventh Circuit 12-11607-C and 12-11972- A
To:
U.S. Department of Justice Amended Complaint information filed against Attorney
General Eric Holder, President Barack Obama, White House Sr. Advisor Valerie
Jarrett, White House Sr. Advisor David Plouffe, Theresa Weathers, Walter C.
Pollard, Carmen L. Mallon, Honorable Gerald Bard Tjoflat, Honorable Stanley
Marcus, Honorable J.L. Edmondson, Honorable Rosemary Barkett, Honorable
William H. Pryor, Jr., Honorable Adalberto Jordan, Honorable Ed Carnes,
Honorable Charles R. Wilson, Honorable Beverly B. Martin, Jonorable Charles A.
Pannell, Jr., William K. Suter, S. Elliott.
To:
Georgia Judiciary Qualifications Commission Amended Complaint information filed
against the Honorable Chief Judge Cynthia D. Wright, the Honorable Judge Tom
Campbell, the Honorable Judge John J. Goger, Honorable Judge Gary M. Alembik,
the Honorable Judge Sally Cobb Cannon, the Honorable Judge Alison K. Arce, the
Honorable Judge D. Todd Markle, Judge Christopher S. Brasher, Judge Henry M.
Newkirk, Judge Kimberly Esmond Adams, Judge Jerry W. Baxter, Judge T. Jackson
Bedford, Jr., Judge Alford J. Dempsey, Jr., Judge Doris L. Downs, Judge Ural
Glanville, Judge Shawn Ellen Lagrua, Judge Bensonetta Tipton Lane, Judge Kelly A.
Lee, Judge Robert C. I. McBurney, Judge Constance C. Russell, Judge Craig Schwall,
Judge Wendy L. Shoob, Judge Gail S. Tusan, Judge Jane Cook Barwick, the
Honorable Judge Maxine Cynthia Morris, Judge Richard Kent, Chief Justice Carol
Hunstein, Presiding Justice Georgia H. Carley, Justice Robert Benham, Justice Hugh
P. Thompson, Justice P. Harris Hines, Justice Harold D. Melton, Justice David E.
Nahmias, Honorable John D. Allen and The Honorable Brenda S. Weaver .
Page 1 of 89
To:
The State Bar of Georgia Amended Complaint information filed against Attorney
Karlise Grier, Attorney Nicholas Sears, Attorney Jennifer Ventry, Attorney Joy
Howard- Smith, Attorney Marvin Blisset, Attorney G. Clyde Dekle, III, Attorney John
Farrell, Attorney Tanya Fairclough-James, Attorney Barbara Miciul, Attorney Avis
Sanders, Attorney Carl J. Willis, II, Attorney Robin Frazer Clark, Attorney Charles
"Buck" Lucius Ruffin, Attorney Patrise M. Perkins-Hooker, Attorney Robert J.
Kauffman, Attorney Kenneth L. Shigley, Attorney Jonathan B. Pannell, Attorney
Darrell L. Sutton, Attorney Amira Arshad, Attorney Jessica Shakelford, Attorney
Sandra Shin, Attorney Amy Abrames, Attorney Angela Billard-Davis, Attorney Liegia
Difazio, Attorney Susan Shaver, Attorney Robert Steele, Attorney Georgia Lord,
Attorney Beth Baer, Attorney Jennifer Ventry, Attorney Cathy Hockman Lyon,
Attorney Allyn Parsons, Attorney Lolita Beyah, Attorney Rupal Romero, Attorney
Carole Powell, Attorney Amy Durrence, Attorney Elizabeth Baum, Attorney Stephanie
Joy Kirijan, Attorney Elizabeth L. Fite, Attorney Phyllis J. Holmen, Attorney David S.
Lipscomb, Attorney Patrick T. O'Connor, Attorney Brian D. "Buck" Rogers, Attorney
Rita Arlene Sheffey, Attorney Steve Laine, Attorney Paula Frederrick, Attorney
Pauline Childress, Attorney Sharon L. Bryant, Attorney Cliff Brashier, Attorney Dee
Dee Worley, Attorney Steven E. Conner, Attorney Jeffrey Davis, Attorney Robert D.
Ingram, Attorney S. Lester Tate, Attorney James B. Durham, Attorney Linda Evans,
Mr. Richard L. Hyde, Attorney Kasim Reed, Attorney Nathan Deal, Attorney Sam
Olens, Attorney Shannon McNulty, Attorney Amy L. Abrames, Attorney Allyn
Parsons, Attorney Benjamin M. Perkins, Attorney Stacey Abrams, Attorney Jack F.
Williams, Attorney Dawn Diedrich, Attorney Robert G. “Rob” Mikell and all
Attorney’s employed or contracted to work on behalf of the Law Division of the
Georgia Department of Human Services – Division of Child Support Services.
To:
The State of Georgia Amended Complaint information filed against Gloria Waldren,
David Chamberlain, Ellen Thomason, Donna Squire, Evelyn Hadley, Andrea Dailey,
Noreen White, Roberta Adams, Carla Broyles, Meaghan Frankish, Chiquita Powell,
Rebecca Conrad, Joy Howard-Smith, Michelle Hansberry, Kimberly Segale, Danetta
Bolton-Johnson, Cathy Derreberry, Gerri Scott, Harriett B. Ford, Max Arrechea,
Officer D. Williams (339), Officer D. Williamson (341), Officer E. Benefield (209),
Officer G. Hightower (225), Officer J. Wyches (239), Investigator C.A. Flournory
(980), Officer M. Voight., Sheriff B. Crawford, Sheriiff Clark, Sheriff Captain D.
Singleton, an Unknown Female Sheriff, Chief Stiles, Lewis R. Slaton, Cathelene “Tina”
Robinson, Arivey Meeks, Keith Horton, Robertiena "Tiena" Fletcher, Franklin
"Frank" G. Auman, Monica Walters, Lisa W. Alexander, Randall P. “Randy” Smith,
Sandra R. Smith, C. Scott Johnson, Spencer Moore, Vernon Keenan, Dan Kirk,
Russell Andrews, George Herrin, Terry Gibbons, Katie Jo Ballard, Matthew Pitts,
Brian Owens, Timothy C. Ward, Ricky Myrick, Randy K. Tillman, Braxton Cotton,
Misty Giles, Melvin Everson, Teresa Chappell, Avery Niles, Carl Brown, Casey Cagle,
Irene Munn, Shea Ross, Cobern Epting, Jennifer Yarber, Senator David Shafer,
Jeremy Collins, John Culverhouse, Dr. William C. Crews, Dr. Carl Camann, Ken
Vance, Brad Pope, Ryan Powell, Mitch Jones, Wayne Melton, David Hill, Paul Shaw,
Penney McRoy, Timothy J. Bearden, Michael Parkerson, Sharla Shockley and Bobby
D. Cagle.
Page 2 of 89
To:
The Board of Court Reporting for the Judicial Council of Georgia Amended
Complaint information filed against Court Reporter Nanette Hull, Matthew
Kloiber, Marla Moore, Aquaria Smith, Evelyn Parker, Cheryl Gilliam, Beverly
Barfield, Melissa Brock, Liz (Elizabeth) Cohn, Amy McKee, Genean Womble,
Keisha Crump, Melanie Reed, Geraldine Glover, Ionie Taylor, Laura Harris,
Melanie Fisher, Evelyn Patterson, Linda Haque, Chris Reed and Wynette Blathers.
To:
Georgia Department of Early Care and Learning Bright from the Start Amended
Complaint filed against License # CCLC-2120 Ben Hill United Methodist Church
Preschool Academy, Ben Hill United Methodist Church, Menyuan Smith, Phyllis
Baskins, Pastor Richard Winn, Mr. Witherspoon, P. Blossomgame, Ashley Sparks,
Vivian Rivera, Will Williams, R. Freeman, Gladys Clay Butts, Bobby Cagle, Kay
Ford, Susan Harper, Kathy Howell, Phil Davis, Carlene Talton, Dawnn Henderson,
Luann Purcell, Janice Gallimore, Victor Morgan as well as Woodward Academy,
Frank Stuart Gulley, Ph.D., Mr. Ben F. Johnson III, Mr. J. Russell Welch and Mr.
Eric Mitchell.
From: Kimberly T. Spence • 541 10th Street, #378 • Atlanta, GA 30313
Date: August 31, 2013
III. Amended Statement of Facts
In the following section, please state the specific facts and circumstances that you believe
amount to judicial misconduct or disability. Please be sure to provide all relevant details, names,
dates, places, addresses and telephone numbers which may assist the Commission in their review
of your complaint.
July 4th Declaration of Independence and the heartfelt 1776 written promise of President Thomas
Jefferson…

It is a disruptive Error for State and Federal agencies to continue to operate under States' Rights to Govern as
It Pleases as a parent and especially as a Mother who carried, gave birth to and raised her child for years
without the assistance (financial or otherwise) from Attorney Willis who has been fraudulently granted full
custody and has been using a fraudulent Order (from Judge John Goger) to prevent me for having visitation
(unless I agree to a forced psychologically evaluated by their select professional colleagues as I do not have
access to my Constitutional Rights under Jim Crow / States Rights to Govern as it Pleases) for nearly three
(3) Months now and further Error that Attorney Willis finally (after months of requesting information in
Page 3 of 89
writing and via Subpoena that he will not sign for and that was eventually Quashed (get rid of the evidence)
by Judge John Goger) provide a sliver of an update on Spencer (EXHIBIT HO – 7:42 AM), which included
the acknowledgement that I missed school orientation and Spencer’s first day of Kindergarten at Ben Hill
(EXHIBIT HO – 7:42 AM)… the school that refused to call the Department of Family and Children
Services after they witnessed several issues with improper care while Spencer was in Attorney Willis custody
because they wanted to ensure that they would not loose the current tuition that they were receiving from
him; the same school that fraudulently called the Atlanta police on me to have me arrested for visiting
Spencer at school (Officer Voight Subpoenaed but Judge John Goger granted a Motion to Quash Subpoena.
However, Officer Voight signed the Sheriff’s Entry of Service acknowledge receipt of the Subpoenas)… the
same school issued a Criminal Trespass Notice of Arrest to prevent me from ever going back to the school
again with out arrest (to prevent me from being informed of Spencer’s well being in an effort to cover-up the
crime of their failure to report incidents of improper care to the Department of Family and Children’s
Services)… the same school that instructed it’s employees to meet in the Judges Chambers area of the
Courthouse to presumably provide secret testimony to the Judges (on the day of the Subpoenaed Depositions
that were prolonged an entire day before Judge Goger issued a statement that the Subpoenaed Depositions
would not be taken. Shortly thereafter, Judge John Goger issued an Order (Error) Quashing (to get rid of )
all of the Trial Subpoenas), instead of providing the required Subpoenaed Depositions as required by law)…
this same school that is academically inept and does not provide a long term solution for Spencer’s
educational matriculation ( Spencer is advanced in low-performing schools because I started him off with
private play-based (children learn best when they are having fun) tutoring before the age of two and
continued it for years. It should also be noted that Attorney sought and hired an alternative tutor (which is
based on memorization and more taxing (due to pressure) on a young child because they are not learning in
a play based or fun environment) to compete with the private instruction offerings that I provided Spencer
once I was not found in Contempt of Court for taking Spencer to the play based tutor and I proved in open
Page 4 of 89
court that Spencer was able to pass his entrance exams for acceptance into private school at age two (2) and
once again at age three (3)). However, because the State and Federal entities and employees are using their
“Discernment” to operate under Jim Crow / States Rights to Govern as it Pleases instead of using their
“Discernment” to act in Spencer’s Best Interest, Spencer was not able to attend a reputable school at age 2,
age 3 or age 4 and now at age 5, Spencer is stuck at this academically inept school (note that Attorney Willis
frequently takes Spencer out of school to take him on lavish and themed vacations (EXHIBIT HO – 7:42
AM) and relies on the alternative tutoring that he enlisted after I was not found to be in Contempt of Court
(for taking Spencer to a tutor) to set the foundation for Spencer’s education and not that Spencer is receiving
a quality education at Ben Hill UMC Preschool. Unfortunately, this decision saved Attorney Willis lots on
money (As Ben Hill is cheaper than the type of school that Spencer was accepted but waitlisted in (due to the
custody issues)) yes, but it was Error and flawed use of “Discernment” to force Spencer to attend the cheaper
school because it needlessly (given the amount of money spent on the Cheaper school and the amount of
money spent on Private Tutoring combined would likely have added up to the amount of money that we
would have spent on Spencer to attend a good school from the very beginning) put Spencer at a disadvantage
because he will have to play catch up (applications, entrance exams, acceptance) as well as compete with a
whole host of other students who will be vying for limited slots at a good school next year during the first
grade. Finally, if he is not accepted into a good school then he will be forced to go to one of Atlanta’s failing
Public School as he will no-longer (due to age) be eligible to even attend academically inept Ben Hill. All of
this is yet again, another stark reminder that the adult Crooks who are using their “Discernment” to operate
under Jim Crow/ States Rights to Govern as it Pleases laws continue to Error as they are not acting in
"Spencer's Best Interest". Further, it is Error for Attorney Willis to be able to afford lavish and themed
vacations (including the recent trip with Spencer to Miami to watch soccer teams from around the world play
in a tournament) during what should have been his first week of school. It is further Error for Judge Goger,
Attorney Sears, Attorney Sanders and Attorney Willis to issue a filed and date stamped Motion and two
Page 5 of 89
separate filed and date stamped Rule Nisi court Hearings on the fraudulent Motion to Address Child Support
Arrearage (Whose proper name is a Motion for Contempt but fraudulently named a Motion to Address Child
Support Arrearage get rid of all of Attorney Willis back Child Support in an effort to open the window of
opportunity to have me falsely arrested (again) for failure to pay Judge Goger’s fraudulent Order on Child
Support. Note also that I was not properly served via Sherriff's Entry of Service and did not receive thirty
(30) days notice from service to respond to the Motion as required by law) when Attorney Willis has proven
that he can afford transportation to Miami, tickets to a themed international sporting event, hotel
accommodations, a rental car and meals associated with this and other lavish and themed vacations, private
school tuition (although at a cheaper rate than good private schools); private tutoring, extracurricular
activities, a mortgage; a cross-over luxury truck, two cars, two motorcycles, secret bank accounts with
$40,000 in it (according to our split of Divorce assets, which awarded you everything to Attorney Willis and
with no requirement to pay alimony) and a $30,000 + per year advertisement billboard on a thirty thousand
($30,000) dollar a year salary…. But he could not afford Spencer’s medical bill, premiums, co-pays and
deductibles (since prior to his birth – EXHIBIT HS) and could not afford to pay the Court Ordered Child
Support (EXHIBIT HR), to which was only ordered several years after Spencer’s birth and ALL of the State
of Georgia Entities (which operate under States Rights to Govern as it Pleases), to include the Georgia
Department of Drivers Services Commission (Attorney Robert G. “Rob” Mikell), all of the Attorney’s who
are employed or contracted in the Law Division of the Georgia Department of Human Services – Division of
Child Support (for example) have legally condoned and have participated in obstructing justice (along with
other state of Georgia Employees like the Fulton County Superior Court Clerk (Cathelene Tina Robinson)
who refused to allow me to file court Motions, Petitions and / or Subpoena’s without requesting permission
from Judge Goger (who has fraudulently and injudiciously denied every request) to proceed in a Trial as
provided by my Constitutional Right to have a Fair Trial and Bobby D. Cagle (for example) who refuses to
hold Ben Hill Christian Academy Accountable for their fraudulent choices and their fraudulent actions) by
Page 6 of 89
refusing to suspend Attorney Willis Drivers License (EXHIBIT HR) and / or File Motions for Contempt
(EXHIBIT HR) against Attorney Willis for his failure to pay his Child Support Arrears for years. Finally
for the above and below listed reasons, it is Error to operate under Jim Crow / States Rights to Govern as It
Pleases as State and Federal licensed entities or employees financially caused a financial hardship for my
family and I with no less than several hundred thousand dollars in litigation expenses (alone as the Frivolous
Errors will also need to cover the intentional, egregious and malicious loss of State employment, benefits,
health insurance and retirement during this timeframe (Termination of Employment due to “Count Leave noLonger Approved”… although I was using my vacation, sick leave and non-paid furlough days for the
required fraudulent Court Appearances), etc.) due to five (5) years of intentional, malicious, egregious and
willful legal stall tactics and clear forms of legal retaliation. These varying forms of oppression Errors are
outlined in all of the Complaints via the Superior Court, the Georgia Appeals Court, the Supreme Court of
Georgia, the U.S. District Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals, the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Department of
Justice agencies, to include the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Civil Rights Division, the Attorney
General’s Office, the White House Administration, the Judicial Qualifications Commission, the State Bar of
Georgia, the Georgia State Government Administration, the City of Atlanta Administration, the Board of
Court Reporting for the Judicial Council of Georgia and the Georgia Department of Early Care and Learning
Bright from the Start (Governed by the State of Georgia). It is Error to operate under Jim Crow / States Right
to Govern as it Pleases laws because they were designed to erroneously prevent citizens from having access
to their Constitutional Rights as afforded by the Constitution (particularly the Bill of Rights) and the
Declaration of Independence (“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that
they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and
the Pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their
just powers from the consent of the governed; – President Thomas Jefferson 1776") the United States of
America). It is Error that the Jim Crow / States Rights to Govern as it Pleases laws were and are used as a
Page 7 of 89
successful means to oppress me… as well as other citizens based on class, race, gender, religion or sexual
orientation in an effort to protect corrupt Professions and their personal means of earning and securing
personal financial security (jobs, benefits, retirement plans, perks) at my and other citizens personal expense.
For example, Attorney Carl Willis, Attorney Avis Sanders (second Attorney for Attorney Willis), Attorney
G. Clyde Dekle, III (first Attorney to Attorney Willis) clearly lied in legal documents and open court during
Trials and Hearings. However, now that they have been caught in their lies, the reporting State and Federal
Agencies that oversee them refuse to hold them accountable for their choices and their actions. Needless to
say, these proven liars have even arrogantly gone so far as to verbally say “I will use the 5th Amendment”
(EXHIBIT HO), knowing that again, no-one will hold them accountable for their choices and their actions…
which is again why theses corrupt individuals arrogantly continue to make up Motions, Petitions and Orders.
Their decision to make –up Motions, Petitions and Orders as well as without providing access to a Fair Trial
(Filed and Date Stamped Motion, Service via Sheriff’s Entry of Services, Thirty Days to Respond to a Motion
of Petition, Presentation of Written and Verbal Evidence (per Judge Goger, I can not file ANY Motions,
Petitions or request Subpoena’s without his written permission with the Clerk of the Court and the Clerk of
the Court has assisted Judge Goger with preventing me from having access to my Constitutional Right to a
Fair Trial by Denying me the Right to File Motions, Petitions and Subpoenas as well as refusing re-service
on existing Subpoenas, which were relevant to having my ability to substantiate the allegation listed in my
Complaints.). These corrupt State and Federal entities and employees (without anyone to hold them
accountable), arrogantly provide and / or assist in substantiating Erroneous Motions, Petitions and Orders by
allowing Judge Cynthia Wright, Judge Tom Campbell, Judge John Goger, Chief Justice Carol Hunstein,
Presiding Justice Georgia H. Carley, Justice Robert Benham, Justice Hugh P. Thompson, Justice P. Harris
Hines, Justice Harold D. Melton, Justice David E. Nahmias (
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nezDD_kfaw ), Woodward Academy, Ben Hill United Methodist
Church Preschool Academy and the above listed Justices, Judges, Attorney’s (I.E. Spencer’s Guardian Ad
Page 8 of 89
Litem – Karlise Grier who was paid to act not in the Best Interest of her professional colleagues but in
Spencer’s Best Interest and yet she “forgot” to bring her evidence to testify during the second Trial and
refuses to sign for the Subpoenas via Sheriff’s Entry of Service (for example). Her choices have
intentionally, maliciously and egregiously prevented and continues to prevent the inclusion of accurate Trial
evidence and / or the preservation of Evidence in a court of law), State and Federal Entities (I.e. Court
Reporter Nanette Hull’s decision to change the Trial and Deposition Transcripts and file and date stamp a
Motion to Quash (get rid of the evidence) Subpoena of the Audio version of the Trial, which could have
proven that the Trial and Deposition Transcripts had been changes as well as Republican Judge Tom
Campbell’s use of “Discernment” to Grant a Motion to Quash Subpoena (get rid of the evidence). Her
choices have intentionally, maliciously and egregiously prevented and continue to prevent the inclusion of
accurate Trial evidence and / or the preservation of Evidence in a court of law), which in turn prevented me
from having access to a fair trial and continues to allow State of Georgia and Federally licensed entities and /
or employees to maliciously, intentionally and egregiously use their “Discernment” to deprive me of my right
to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. For this reason and the below listed reasons, all of Judge Goger’s
Orders should be set aside in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1655, “Rule 60. Relief From A Judgment
Or Order (b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding); wherein the
court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or
proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable
neglect; (3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or
misconduct by an opposing party; (6) any other reason that justifies relief.”, 42 U.S.C. §
1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2), “which describes Obstruction of Justice”, wherein “if two or
more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in
any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any
Page 9 of 89
citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully
enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal
protection of the laws.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3), wherein “if one or more persons engaged
therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy,
whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any
right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have
an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any
one or more of the conspirators”, Civil Rights Act of 1871, Civil Rights Act of 1961, Fifth
Amendment Right, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), Fourteenth Amendments Due Process Clause,
Mugler V. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623 at 661, Sixth Amendment”.), Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act (RICO), which was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of
1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted October 15, 1970), Fernandez v. United States, 2009 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 63796, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. July 24, 2009), Livingston v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 759
F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1985), United States v. Bohr, 406 F. Supp 1218 (E.D. Wis. 1976), United States v.
Doe, 935 F. Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y. 1996), Sealed Appellant v. Sealed Appellee, 130 F.3d 695, 697 (5th
Cir.1997), Dean v. United States, 418 F. Supp. 149(E.D.N.Y. 2006); Doe v. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021(S.D.N.Y. June 29, 2004), Doe, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021 at
*46 S.REGION BLACK L. STUDENTS ASS’NL.J. 31, 32-33 (2012), Burt W. Griffin & Lewis R. Katz
OH. FELONY SENT.L. § 5:53 (2008), Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361, 365 (1989), United
States v. Lucido, 612 F.3d 871, 872-73 (6th Cir. 2010), 18 U.S.C. § 1503, United States v. McLeod, 385
F.2d 734, 747-50 (5thCir. 1967), Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. 41-3-12 (2010), GA CODE ANN. § 9-11-4
(2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(c) (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(e)(7) (2012), GA Code Ann § 911-5(f) (2012), GA CODE ANN .§ 9-3-51(a) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-22 (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3Page 10 of 89
31 (2012), O'Callaghan v. Bank of Eastman, 180 Ga. 812, 818 (1935), GA Code Ann 9-3-1 and 9-3-2
(2012), GA Code Ann § 44-5-163 (2012), GA Code Ann GA Code Ann § 9-11-26(b)(4)(A)(i) (2012), GA
Code Ann § 9-11-34(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(b)(c)(2) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-5-7 (2012),
GA Code Ann, § 9-11-30 (2012), Carruth v. Brown, 202 Ga. App. 656, 658 (1992), Huff v. Anderson,
212 Ga. 32, 34 (1955), Pitmon v. State, 265 Ga. App. 655, 659 (2004), Giles v. Jones, 169 Ga. App. 882
(1984), GA Constitution Case Co. v. Parker, 161 Ga. App. 614, 617 (1982), Myers v. Barnard, 180 Ga.
App. 192, 193 (1986), GA Code Ann § 24-2-2 (2012), Hendrix v. Byers Bldg. Supply, Inc.,167 Ga. App.
878, 880 (1983), Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire v. Campbell Nissan N. Am., 258 Ga. App. 767, 768
(2002), Bowen, 246 Ga. App. at 180, Chapman, 220 Ga. App. at 542 , GA Code Ann § 24-4-22 Radford
v. State, 251 Ga. 50, 53 (1983), Jones v. Krystal Co., 231 Ga. App. 102, 107 (1998), Atlanta Oculoplastic
Surgery, P.C. v. Nestlehutt 286 Ga. 731, 735-36 (2010), GA Constitution art. I, § I, para. XI(a), Porter
v. Bland, 105 Ga. App. 703, 709 (1962), Long v. Serritt, 102 Ga. App. 550, 554 -55 (1960), GA Code
Ann § 51-12-5.1(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(b) (2012), Suarez v. Halbert, 246 Ga. App. 822,
824 (2000), O.C.G.A. 40-5-54.1 (2010), Georgia Code § 35-3-37, Georgia Code § 24-4-65, Georgia Code
§ 15-11-83.… which are direct violations of Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. § 16-10-1: “[A]ny public
officer who willfully and intentionally violates the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall, upon
conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years” and
O.C.G.A. § 15-6-6: “[B]efore entering on the duties of their office, superior court judges must take the oath
required of all civil officers and in addition they must take the following oath: “I swear that I will
administer justice without respect to person and do equal rights to the poor and the rich and that I will
faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent on me as judge of the
superior courts of this state, according to the best of my ability and understanding, and agreeably to
the laws and Constitution of this state ability and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and
Constitution of this state and the Constitution of the United States. So help me God.” Therefore all of
Page 11 of 89
the above listed Officers of the Court should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of State and Federal laws for
the above as well as the below listed Constitutional Violations.
EXHIBIT HO
Yahoo Email – Wednesday, August 14, 2013 at 4:59 PM, 3:17 (from Kimberly Spence), Tuesday, August
13, 2013 at 8:00 PM (from Kimberly Spence), 6:04 PM (from Nicholas Sears- Staff Attorney to Judge
Goger), 5:29 PM (from Kimberly Spence), 4:12 PM (from Attorney Carl Willis), 1:56 PM (from Nicholas
Sears- Staff Attorney to Judge Goger), 11:23 AM (from Attorney Carl Willis- Written Notice to take the
5th Amendment) and 11:29 AM (from Attorney Carl Willis), Tuesday, August 13, 2013 at 9:48 AM (from
Kimberly Spence, 7:42 AM (from Attorney Carl Willis), Monday, August 12, 2013 at 5:17 PM, 4:42 PM
and 3:29 PM (from Kimberly Spence), Thursday, August 8, 2013 at 7:04 PM (from Kimberly Spence) and
Tuesday, August 6, 2013 at 4:10 PM (from Kimberly Spence) – Subjects: Updated Rule Nisi Reminder
Presiding Judge and Conflict Letter, Willis v. Spence, Conflict Tomorrow – Topic: Re-issue of Rule Nisi
(Court Date) on the fraudulent “Motion to Address Child Support Arrearage”, which is intended to erase
off of Attorney Willis back Child Support in an effort to allow the future means, opportunity and
rationale for my arrest for failure to pay for the fraudulent Child Support as recently Ordered and
required by Judge John Goger. The recent fraudulent Order was not based on actual income of either
party and / or Any evidence presented during the Trial or Child Support Hearing (Pay Check Stubs, W-2’s,
Subpoenaed Contracts for Attorney Willis massively large Advertisement billboard, etc.).
EXHIBIT HP
Yahoo Email regarding Judge John Goger’s Rule Nisi on fraudulent Motion to Address Child Support
Arrearage- Friday, August 16, 2013 (from Nicholas Sears – Staff Attorney to Judge John Goger) – Subject:
Willis v. Spence
EXHIBIT HQ
Judge John Goger’s Rule Nisi on fraudulent Motion to Address Child Support Arrearage- Friday, August
16, 2013 (from Nicholas Sears – Staff Attorney to Judge John Goger) – Subject: Willis v. Spence
EXHIBIT HR
Georgia Department of Human Services – Division of Child Support Services Case Activity- Monday,
August 26, 2013 – Agent Notes – Requested Suspension of Attorney Willis Drivers License on August
14, 2013 but the Georgia Department of Drivers Services (a State of Georgia Agency governed by States
Rights to Govern as it Pleases) refuses to suspend Attorney Willis Drivers License as required by law.
Additionally as noted by the Agent, the Law Division of the Georgia Department of Human Services –
Division of Child Support Services (a State of Georgia Agency governed by States Rights to Govern as it
Page 12 of 89
Pleases) refuses to file a Motion for Contempt (although this is the second request) against Attorney
Willis for his failure to pay Child Support Arrears because this would undoubtedly result in
Attorney Willis being found in violation of EVERY Judicial Order and Motion for Contempt filled
against him for the last five years for his failure to pay Child Support and / or Child Support Arrears.
EXHIBIT HS
Humana Employers Health Plan of Georgia, Inc. Claim Receipt to serve as further proof of Spencer’s
continued required medical attention under Attorney Willis supervision and proof that I continue to
pay for all of Spencer’s medical premiums, deductibles and co-pays although under Judge Goger’s
fraudulent Orders, I have absolutely no right to obtain ANY information regarding Spencer’s well
being or care and Attorney Willis continues to refuse to provide me with ANY information regarding
Spencer’s well being and / or care or ANYTHING else related to Spencer… including but limited to his
education and / or extra-curricular activities, church affiliation, vacations, holidays, birthdays, etc..
According to Judge Goger (under States Rights to Govern as it Pleases) is the opportunity to continue to
pay the bills while being deprived of my liberty and my right to happiness via parental rights to see, visit
and have earned rights to access to my child information.

It is Error for Attorney Nicholas Sears to continue to refuse to provide (EXHIBIT HC) filed and
date stamped copies of the Motions and Orders that Judge Goger relied on to develop all his
fraudulent Orders. Attorney Nicholas Sears, Attorney Avis Sanders and Attorney Carl Willis’,
failure to provide (via email, mail or Sheriff’s Service) copies of the requested…
Motions
1. Recommended Civil PreTrial Order
2. Motion on Child Support and Financial Affidavit
3. Motion to Request Attorney's Fees
4. Answer to Summary Judgment and Expedited Trial
5. Answer to Motion for Contempt (Against Attorney Willis - 5/20/13)
6. Answer to Motion for Contempt (Against Attorney Willis - 7/3/13)
7. Motion to Dismiss Petition for Change of Custody (Against Attorney Willis - 6/2/13)
Page 13 of 89
8. Motion for Contempt and Sheriff's Entry of Service (When Attorney Sanders argued that
I should be arrested for disrupting Spencer's classroom (a lie), followed by the need to
have Police Office Voight escort me off of Ben Hill's property (another lie).
9. Motion for Contempt, Motion to Quash Subpoenas and Prevent Further Frivolous Filings
and Sheriff's Entry of Service (What Judge Goger used to rely on in his 5/28/13, 6/7/13,
6/12/13, 6/14/13, 7/3/13 and 7/8/13 Orders).
10. Motion for Contempt and Sheriff's Entry of Service (that Judge Goger relied on for his
6/14/13 through 6/24/13 Order on Contempt Arrest)
And Orders
1. Order on Request to have Judge Gail S. Tusan, this weeks Presiding Judge Rule on the
Open Issues Contained in this Motion
2. Order on (6/17/13) Request for Early Release and to have the Presiding Judge Rule on
the Open Issues Contained in the Motion
3. Order on (6/21/13) Request for Early Release and to have the Presiding Judge Rule on
the Open Issues Contained in the Motion
violated my right to a fair trial because it prevented me from having the required thirty (30) days
to respond to a Motion presented to Judge Goger prior to each court hearing and prior to Judge
Goger’s issuance of the fraudulent non-Judicious and oppressive Orders, which were intended to
threaten, intimidate, bait, force and threaten me into dropping the Federal States Rights to
Govern as it Pleases cases.
It is further Error for other State entities to willingly participate in the corruptions, from the
Superior Court Clerks Office (EXHIBIT HV) to Woodward Academy to Ben Hill. It is Further
Error that Ms. River (with the help of these Crooks) sullenly point out (EXHIBIT HF) that
Page 14 of 89
Spencer deserves both parents and yet she herself along with the rest of the Crooks have been
willing participants in the Jim Crow / States Rights to Govern as it Pleases corruption (I.e. falsely
taking ALL of my custodial and visitation rights away for refusing to be psychologically
evaluated, false imprisonment, attempts at false institutionalization due to false accusations of
being "mentally insane" and "crazy" (EXHIBIT HF), false attempts at foreclosing on my home,
falsely banning me from visiting Spencer at Ben Hill School (under the threat of past and future
arrest and incarceration), Changing Trial Transcripts, Quashing Subpoenas ( police officers who
were witnesses to Attorney Willis being in violation of the Order, Guardian Ad Litem Karlise
Grier who “investigated” Spencer’s circumstances for over a year but “forgot” to bring her
evidence to testify with at the second trial), completely ignoring Police CAD Reports (which
indicate the days that Attorney Willis was in violation of Judge Goger’s Orders), canceling the
third trial in an effort to prevent witnesses from testifying about the corruption and the clear
abuse of government authority, refusing to furnish filed and date stamped court documents that
Judge Goger relied on in his deliberation of written, fraudulent Orders, quashing subpoenas that
would require that I be allowed to receive information related to school functions (School
Orientation, First Day of School, Thanksgiving Programs, Christmas Programs, Easter
Programs, Halloween Programs. Mother's Day, Parent Nights, Sporting Events, missed
Birthday Parties for Spencer, his cousins, my parents (family in general), friends, his end of
school year party, his Kindergarten Graduation,)so that I would not be made aware of anything
related to Spencer’s education and extra-curricular activities because these cruel and lacks
character, integrity and values adults believe that they genuinely have the right... the States
Rights to Govern as it Pleases... which means that they in essence believe that they have the
Constitutional Right (via the use of Jim Crow States Rights to Govern as it Pleases) to control
every aspect of my life, Spencer's life, my families life and countless other millions of lives that
Page 15 of 89
are currently regulated under this fear, threat and intimidation based oppressive regime called the
State of Georgia. This fear, threat and intimidation based oppressive regime has succeeded in
ensuring that Spencer would not have his Mother... Me, the women who carried him, birthed
him, nursed him and took care of him physically, financially and emotionally… until he was
falsely snatched out of my life and into his current life of drug exposure, lies, fear and
intimidation with his father (Attorney Willis), with whom the court, the school and everyone else
charged with securing and protecting the Best Interest of this minor child failed him at every
opportune chance (EXHIBITS HC, HD, HE, HF, HG, HH, HI, HJ, HK, HL, HM, HN, HO,
HP, HQ, HR, HS, HT, HU, HV and HW). It is further Error for Ms. Vivian Rivera to
selectively remember to point out my own Mothers anguish... My Mothers tears, but then at the
same time she “forgot” to notate Spencer’s tears.
1. The countless number of tears shed that she watched and observed weeks in and weeks
out, months in and months out. The anguish that she noticed in my Mothers eyes that she
also say in Spencer’s eyes.
2. The weeks that turned into months of tears (that she witnessed) when she first met
Spencer after being dropped off (without notice at a new school when Attorney Willis
failed to pay the registration fee at his Daycare)...
3. The weeks that turned into months of tears that she saw while he was in anguish from
showing visible signs of neglect (sores)...
4. The weeks that turned into months of tears related to stress, missing his Mother and being
hungry...
5. The weeks that turned into months that she saw fear in his eyes from being controlled
(through fear, demand and reprimand) by Attorney Willis...
Page 16 of 89
And yet Ms. Rivera states that she took care of Spencer as she would her own children. Dare I be so bold (Like
Sabrina Fullerton’s response to Juror B29’s statement that she as a mother felt the same pain) to say that Ms.
Rivera is lying. She would not sit by and continue to care for her own sick child week in and week out and
month in and month out AND watch that child wither from the vibrant, self-assured, smiling and laughing-allthe-time child into one in which every ounce of glimmer in his or her own eyes has withered into sadness, fear,
hopelessness and abandonment… just to protect someone else's job… or someone else's reputation… or
someone else's church as she and the rest of the Crooks expect from me. Based on her choices and her actions
in this case, she is lying when she stated that she took care of Spencer as if he were her own child.
Furthermore, what good is it to represent yourself as a person of God when your actions and choices clearly
indicate that you are selfish, hypocritical, cruel and mean spirited enough to not only look past, but to neglect
and rationalize in your own mind why it is in your own mind ok to willingly participate in the destruction of
another human… a five (5) year old at that. It is disturbing, a complete farce and an absolute Error that these so
–called Christians would call upon the name of The Lord… as if God was pleased with their choices and their
actions AND as if I would not be able to clearly see the use of religious manipulation (that has been used to
demean an individuals self worth since slavery) as a means to justify evil with the words “God never fails.
Who knows but God, maybe it is assigned to Spencer by God to heal his father from his hellish ways; and if
this is true can you let him do it and wait on God?”. The pathology is just sick and disgusting and I am utterly
outraged by the entire Ben Hill Administration, lead by Pastor Richard Winn, as they present themselves as
upstanding members of society (hosting African American History programs, commemorating the Civil Rights
Movement (every year on Dr. King’s Birthday) and hosting a number of town hall meetings with community
"leaders", etc.) and yet they have or see absolutely NO problem with actively participating in the lies, coverups, manipulation and excuses shared equally by all involved parties in to protect their own greedy, selfserving interests at the expense of Spencer’s Best Interest… my expense and my families expense. For this
reason and the below listed reasons, all of Judge Goger’s Orders should be set aside in accordance with 28
Page 17 of 89
U.S.C. § 1655, “Rule 60. Relief From A Judgment Or Order (b) Grounds for Relief from a
Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding); wherein the court may relieve a party or its legal
representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1)
mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (3) fraud (whether previously called
intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party; (6) any other
reason that justifies relief.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2), “which describes
Obstruction of Justice”, wherein “if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding,
hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or
Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or
his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of
persons, to the equal protection of the laws.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3), wherein “if one or more
persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such
conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and
exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or
deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or
deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators”, Civil Rights Act of 1871, Civil Rights Act
of 1961, Fifth Amendment Right, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), Fourteenth Amendments Due
Process Clause, Mugler V. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623 at 661, Sixth Amendment”.), Racketeer Influenced and
Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), which was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control
Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted October 15, 1970), Fernandez v. United States, 2009
U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63796, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. July 24, 2009), Livingston v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 759
F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1985), United States v. Bohr, 406 F. Supp 1218 (E.D. Wis. 1976), United States v. Doe,
Page 18 of 89
935 F. Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y. 1996), Sealed Appellant v. Sealed Appellee, 130 F.3d 695, 697 (5th Cir.1997),
Dean v. United States, 418 F. Supp. 149(E.D.N.Y. 2006); Doe v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement,
2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021(S.D.N.Y. June 29, 2004), Doe, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021 at *46 S.REGION
BLACK L. STUDENTS ASS’NL.J. 31, 32-33 (2012), Burt W. Griffin & Lewis R. Katz OH. FELONY
SENT.L. § 5:53 (2008), Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361, 365 (1989), United States v. Lucido, 612
F.3d 871, 872-73 (6th Cir. 2010), 18 U.S.C. § 1503, United States v. McLeod, 385 F.2d 734, 747-50
(5thCir. 1967), Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. 41-3-12 (2010), GA CODE ANN. § 9-11-4 (2012), GA CODE
ANN § 9-11-4(c) (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(e)(7) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-5(f) (2012), GA
CODE ANN .§ 9-3-51(a) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-22 (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-31 (2012),
O'Callaghan v. Bank of Eastman, 180 Ga. 812, 818 (1935), GA Code Ann 9-3-1 and 9-3-2 (2012), GA
Code Ann § 44-5-163 (2012), GA Code Ann GA Code Ann § 9-11-26(b)(4)(A)(i) (2012), GA Code Ann §
9-11-34(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(b)(c)(2) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-5-7 (2012), GA Code Ann,
§ 9-11-30 (2012), Carruth v. Brown, 202 Ga. App. 656, 658 (1992), Huff v. Anderson, 212 Ga. 32, 34
(1955), Pitmon v. State, 265 Ga. App. 655, 659 (2004), Giles v. Jones, 169 Ga. App. 882 (1984), GA
Constitution Case Co. v. Parker, 161 Ga. App. 614, 617 (1982), Myers v. Barnard, 180 Ga. App. 192, 193
(1986), GA Code Ann § 24-2-2 (2012), Hendrix v. Byers Bldg. Supply, Inc.,167 Ga. App. 878, 880 (1983),
Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire v. Campbell Nissan N. Am., 258 Ga. App. 767, 768 (2002), Bowen, 246
Ga. App. at 180, Chapman, 220 Ga. App. at 542 , GA Code Ann § 24-4-22 Radford v. State, 251 Ga. 50,
53 (1983), Jones v. Krystal Co., 231 Ga. App. 102, 107 (1998), Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery, P.C. v.
Nestlehutt 286 Ga. 731, 735-36 (2010), GA Constitution art. I, § I, para. XI(a), Porter v. Bland, 105 Ga.
App. 703, 709 (1962), Long v. Serritt, 102 Ga. App. 550, 554 -55 (1960), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(c)
(2012), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(b) (2012), Suarez v. Halbert, 246 Ga. App. 822, 824 (2000), O.C.G.A.
40-5-54.1 (2010), Georgia Code § 35-3-37, Georgia Code § 24-4-65, Georgia Code § 15-11-83.… which
are direct violations of Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. § 16-10-1: “[A]ny public officer who willfully and
Page 19 of 89
intentionally violates the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall, upon conviction thereof, be
punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years” and O.C.G.A. § 15-6-6:
“[B]efore entering on the duties of their office, superior court judges must take the oath required of all civil
officers and in addition they must take the following oath: “I swear that I will administer justice without
respect to person and do equal rights to the poor and the rich and that I will faithfully and impartially
discharge and perform all the duties incumbent on me as judge of the superior courts of this state,
according to the best of my ability and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this
state ability and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state and the
Constitution of the United States. So help me God.” Therefore all of the above listed Officers of the Court
should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of State and Federal laws for the above as well as the below listed
Constitutional Violations.
EXHIBIT HC
Yahoo Email – Thursday, August 1, 2013 at 3:54 PM (From Kimberly Spence), 1:47 PM (from Nicholas SearsStaff Attorney to Judge Goger), 10:56 AM (from Attorney Nicholas Sears), 10:49 AM (from Kimberly Spence)
– Subject: Re: Presiding Judge – Topic: Denied request for copies of the filed and date stamped missing
Motions and Orders.
EXHIBIT HD
Witness Questionnaire – presented to Ms. Vivian Rivera (former Teachers Assistant and Ben Hill Christian
Academy) via email on Saturday, August 3, 2013 at 11:59 AM and 12:10 PM
EXHIBIT HE
Yahoo Email – Saturday, August 3, 2013 at 12:10 PM (from Kimberly Spence) at 11:59 AM (from Kimberly
EXHIBIT HF
Yahoo Email – Monday, August 5, 2013 at 3:45 PM (from Kimberly Spence), 3:28 PM (from Kimberly
Spence), 3:14 PM (from Kimberly Spence), 2:49 PM (from Ms. Rivera), Friday August 2, 2013 at 9:27 PM
(from Kimberly Spence) and 6:59 PM (from Ms. Rivera- Ben Hill) - Subject: Found: Priceless Treasures –
Topic: Ms. Rivera’s agreement to answer my questions regarding the case.
EXHIBIT HG
Yahoo Email – Monday, April 15, 2013 at 9:27 AM (from Kimberly Spence), 8:58 AM (from Kimberly
Spence), 6:09 AM (from Vivian Campbell), April 7, 2013 at 9:35 AM (from Kimberly Spence), April 6, 2013 at
9:04 AM (from Kimberly Spence), April 5, 2013 at 7:13 PM (from Menyuan Smith – Ben Hill) – Subject:
Page 20 of 89
Visitation of Spencer – Topic: Ms. Smith’s outlined new restriction on visitation at Ben Hill School (CC’d the
Ben Hill Administrators, Judicial Officers of the Court and the White House Administration).
EXHIBIT HH
Yahoo Email – Saturday, April 13, 2013 at 9:55 AM (from Kimberly Spence), 9:21 AM (from Kimberly
Spence), Friday, April 12, 2013 at 12:53 PM (from Phyllis Baskins- Ben Hill), Thursday, April 11, 2013 at 1:30
PM (from Attorney Nicholas Sears), 1:17 PM (from Kimberly Spence), Wednesday April 10, 2013 at 3:43 PM
(from Attorney Nicholas Sears. - Subject: Re: Motion to Reconsider Order on Motion for Contempt,
Expedited Trial and Summary Judgment and Academy Visitation for Spencer – Topic: Ms. Baskins outlined
new restriction on visitation at Ben Hill School and the bases for the new restrictions (“We also have a copy of
the Final Court Order from the Superior Court of Fulton County, State of Georgia, filed March 14, 2013, on
file to protect the Church regarding this matter.”, which DOES not state or require ANY RESTRICTIONS on
VISITATION and that’s why the school later issued a Cease and Desist or face arrest for Criminal Trespass
via Atlanta Police Officer Voight (called to have me falsely arrested for attempting to visit Spencer) to cover up
for their Error and Judge Goger’s fraudulent Order) and proof that Attorney Sears continued to avoid
providing copies of the requested filed and date stamped Motions and Orders as required by law (CC’d the
Ben Hill Administrators, Judicial Officers of the Court and the White House Administration).
EXHIBIT HI
Yahoo Email – Saturday, April 6, 2013 at 9:04 AM (from Kimberly Spence) and Friday, April 5, 2013 at 7:13
PM (from Menyuan Smith – Ben Hill) - Subject: Motion to Reconsider Order on Motion for Contempt,
Expedited Trial and Summary Judgment as well as Visitation of Spencer – Topic: Ms. Smith’s outlined new
restriction on visitation at Ben Hill School (CC’d the Ben Hill Administrators, Judicial Officers of the Court
and the White House Administration).
EXHIBIT HJ
Yahoo Email – Saturday, April 4, 2013 at 10:52 AM (from Kimberly Spence), 10:52 AM (from Kimberly
Spence) and 10:10 AM (from Menyuan Smith – Ben Hill) - Subject: Motion to Reconsider Order on Motion for
Contempt, Expedited Trial and Summary Judgment as well as Visitation of Spencer – Topic: Ms. Smith’s
formal request to stop visiting Ben Hill School daily to request my right to visitation and offers up alternative
methods of visitation (which of course were never provided and even if they were would have to be approved
by Attorney Willis per her own written instruction) (CC’d the Ben Hill Administrators, Judicial Officers of the
Court and the White House Administration).
EXHIBIT HK
Yahoo Email – Thursday, April 4, 2013 at 2:07 PM (from Kimberly Spence), 1:16 PM (from Attorney Nicholas
Sears) and 1:16 PM – Subject: Subject: Motion to Reconsider Order on Motion for Contempt, Expedited Trial
Page 21 of 89
and Summary Judgment – Topic: A provided explanation of the Order and notification to Ben Hill that I
would be requesting my right to visitation and filing Complaints every time my rights were denied. Proof of
the staff tactics from Attorney Nicholas Sears who continued to provide filed and date stamped Orders or the
Court. (CC’d the Ben Hill Administrators, Judicial Officers of the Court and the White House
Administration).
EXHIBIT HL
Yahoo Email – Friday, March 22, 2013 at 4:37 PM (from Erika Gardner- Ben Hill PTA President), 4:13 PM
(from Menyuan Smith- Ben Hill), 4:07 PM (from Kimberly Spence), 3:18 PM (from Attorney Nicholas Sears)Subject: Motionto Reconsider Order on Motion for Contempt, Expedited Trial and Summary Judgment,
Spring Carnival and Spence v. Willis, Motions to Reconsider – Topic: Proof that I was no longer being
included in notifications (email or otherwise) regarding volunteer opportunities and Attorney Nicholas Sears
sudden invitation to have a Court Hearing on the Motions to Reconsider that were later postponed and then
denied without cause (CC’d the Ben Hill Administrators, Judicial Officers of the Court and the White House
Administration).
EXHIBIT HM Yahoo Email – Tuesday, February 26, 2013 at 7:50 PM and 5:21 PM (from Attorney Carl Willis) Subject: FYI
– Topic: Notification to the school that Attorney Willis was granted full custody and the “legal” reasons why
(CC’d the Ben Hill Administrators, Judicial Officers of the Court and the White House Administration).
EXHIBIT HN
Yahoo Email – Friday, February 1, 2013 at 3:16 PM (from Kimberly Spence), 11:15 PM (from Menyuan
Smith- Ben Hill), 10:50 PM (from Kimberly Spence), 10:47 AM (from Menyuan Smith)- Subject: Tuition
Policy Reminder – Topic: Attorney Willis failure to pay tuition, which is the primary reason (pay) that
Spencer lost his coved slot at his old Daycare and ended up dumped at Ben Hill at the last moment because
Attorney Willis failed to apply for schools and would not agree to allow Spencer to attend the highly reputable
and accredited private school that I applied to that Spencer was waitlisted (pending the outcome of custody)
two years in a row. Now Spencer is stuck (again for another year) at a School (Ben Hill) where they obviously
care more about the money coming in than the welfare of their students; where I am not welcome – yes, but
also where Spencer is academically too advanced for their educational offerings (CC’d the Ben Hill
Administrators, Judicial Officers of the Court and the White House Administration). By intentional, malicious
and egregious mean spirited design, none of the decision of these adults have been in Spencer’s Best Interest.
Page 22 of 89
EXHIBIT HO
Yahoo Email – Wednesday, December 19, 2013 at 9:41 AM (from Kimberly Spence) - Subject: Spencer Willis
Concers – Topic: Remain regarding critical concerns related to Spencer’s welfare and academic matriculation
(CC’d the Ben Hill Administrators, Judicial Officers of the Court and the White House Administration).
EXHIBIT HP
Yahoo Email – Wednesday, December 19, 2013 at 9:41 AM (from Menyuan Smith- Ben Hill), November 28,
2012 at 12:43 PM (from Menyuan Smith- Ben Hill) - Subject: BHUMCCA Volunteer Opportunities –
Specifically for Dec. 20th 2012 - Topic: Proof of submission for Background Check as a volunteer (CC’d the
Ben Hill Administrators, Judicial Officers of the Court and the White House Administration).
EXHIBIT HQ
Yahoo Email – Friday, November 9, 2013 at 12:16 PM, 12:15 PM (from Kimberly Spence) and Wednesday,
October 10, 2012 at 10:29 AM (from Kimberly Spence) - Subject: Spencer Willis – Topic: Attorney Willis
failure to pay tuition, which is the primary reason (pay) that Spencer lost his coved slot at his old Daycare and
ended up dumped at Ben Hill at the last moment because Attorney Willis failed to apply for schools and would
not agree to allow Spencer to attend the highly reputable and accredited private school that I applied to that
Spencer was waitlisted (pending the outcome of custody) two years in a row. Now Spencer is stuck (again for
another year) at a School (Ben Hill) where they obviously care more about the money coming in than the
welfare of their students; where I am not welcome – yes, but also where Spencer is academically too advanced
for their educational offerings (CC’d the Ben Hill Administrators, Judicial Officers of the Court and the White
House Administration). By intentional, malicious and egregious mean spirited design, none of the decision of
these adults have been in Spencer’s Best Interest.
EXHIBIT HR
Yahoo Email – Wednesday, October 10, 2012 at 10:29 AM (from Kimberly Spence) - Subject: Spencer Willis –
Topic: Proof of notification of Attorney Willis threatening behavior (CC’d the Ben Hill Administrators,
Judicial Officers of the Court and the White House Administration).
EXHIBIT HS
Yahoo Email – Monday, October 1, 2013 at 8:33 PM (from Kimberly Spence), 8:01 PM (from Menyuan SmithBen Hill), 7:54 PM (from Kimberly Spence) - Subject: Spencer Willis Field Trips – Topic: Proof that Ben Hill
changed field trip volunteer opportunities based on Attorney Willis desires without courtesy notification (CC’d
the Ben Hill Administrators, Judicial Officers of the Court and the White House Administration).
EXHIBIT HT
Yahoo Email – Thursday, September 27, 2012 at 4:04 PM (from Kimberly Spence), 12:56 PM (from Menyuan
Smith- Ben Hill), 12:51 PM (from Kimberly Spence), Tuesday, September 25, 2012 at 12:17 PM (from
Menyuan Smith – Ben Hill) - Subject: Update re Field Trips – Topic: Proof that Ben Hill changed field trip
volunteer opportunities based on Attorney Willis desires without courtesy notification and a complete example
Page 23 of 89
of school field trip opportunities (CC’d the Ben Hill Administrators, Judicial Officers of the Court and the
White House Administration).
EXHIBIT HU
Yahoo Email – Friday, August 31, 2013 at 11:17 AM (from Kimberly Spence), Wednesday, August 29, 2013 at
10:54 AM (from Kimberly Spence) - Subject: Spencer Willis – Topic: Proof that I provided Ben Hill
notification of ALL of the issues related to the States Rights Cases in great detail as an outline (Soccer Club
and my issue with the convicted… I mean disbarred Cocaine Dealer coaching in the soccer league (which
apparently they did not mind because it turns out that Attorney Howlette attended Ben Hill as a child),
Custody Background, Behavior Issues, Guardian Ad Litem “Investigation”, Tutoring and Payment
Arrangements, Enumerations or Errors) and attached Exhibits to support all of my claims (CC’d the Ben Hill
Administrators, Judicial Officers of the Court and the White House Administration).
EXHIBIT HV
United States Postal Service Tracking Confirmation – Monday, July 29, 2013 at 7:49 PM Delivery
Confirmation for Ms. Tina Robinson – C/O Lewis Slaton, Clerk of Superior Court- Proof of Sheriff’s ReService request for Subpoenas for Attorney Karlise Grier, Attorney Carl Willis and Woodward Academy (The
School that Spencer attended this summer who has agreed to participate in the corruption by refusing to sign
and return the first Sheriff’s Entry of Service, which includes a Subpoenas for Spencer’s School Application,
Record, Volunteer and Field Trip opportunities, etc. (CC’d the Woodward Academy Administrators, Judicial
Officers of the Court and the White House Administration).
EXHIBIT HW United States Postal Service Tracking Confirmation – Thursday, July 25, 2013 at 10:57 AM Unclaimed
Delivery Confirmation for Attorney Carl Wilis – Proof of the return of Spencer mailed but unclaimed (by
Attorney Willis or Spencer) Care Package because Attorney Willis did not want to sign for a package that
would ultimately prove that one of my only means of communicating with Spencer (due to the corruption) is
via the phone (when Attorney permits) and certainly not on person or via mail (CC’d the Judicial Officers of
the Court and the White House Administration).

On Friday, July 26, 2013, I received quite a number of the signed, Filed and Date Stamped July 22, 2013
with the Clerk of Superior Court Sheriff’s Entry of Service receipts (which coincidentally just so happened to all
have the same July 22, 2013 Date Stamp accept for Court Reporter Gean Womble’s Sheriff’s Entry of Service,
which also had a crossed out Date Stamp of June 14, 2013 with Attorney Carl J. Willis, II name printed under
Page 24 of 89
“Served”) for witnesses that were subpoenaed to testify in the third Trial. As today is July 27, 2013, this
Amended Complaint is properly filed within Georgia’s five (5) day rule for filing Complaints with the Judicial
Qualifications Commission. The mere fact that I would have to subpoena Police Officers, representatives from
Spencer’s School, Spencer’s Guardian Ad Litem (Spencer’s Medical Records, Proven History of Aggression,
Proven Drug use and Proven Criminal Record for Attorney Willis), and still to this day (as Spencer’s Mother and
as the one parent who made sound decisions on behalf of our son) do not even know where he will attend school
in August (a few days from today) or any other relevant concerns related to the son that I carried, gave birth to
and provided for (for years) is a clear indication of the disruptive and clear lack of integrity and value systems of
the people within the State of Georgia (From the state employed Social Services workers, state licensed school’s
who failed to report incidents and visible signs of improper care, to the state licensed guardian ad Litem, court
reporter, attorneys, judges, justices and politician who heard and then participated in the conspiracy to
intentionally, maliciously, egregiously and maliciously deprive me of my Constitutional rights, they are
reprehensibly culpable for their malicious, intentional and egregious actions. Although they were and are fully
aware of Spencer's medical condition, proven improper care by Attorney Willis, proven drug use by Attorney
Willis and proven abusive behavior by Attorney Willis, these disgustingly cruel, self-serving and trifling crooks
continue to completely ignore Spencer's Best Interest and have even been willing to go to the length of having me
falsely arrested and incarcerated but more importantly, they have intentionally kept me away from Spencer (Who
has not seen me in over two months, feels abandoned and who recently cried (again on July 25, 2013)
uncontrollably, whimpering and wheezing with tears streaming down his eyes saying “I have to get off the phone
now” in response to the limited fifteen (15) minute call limit Ordered by Judge Goger and upheld by Attorney
Willis when he does allow me to speak Spencer) under the threat of re-arrest and false institutionalization for
agreeing (against my will) to by Psychologically Evaluated or be stripped of ALL my rights to visitation and
custody. It should also be noted that Spencer once was a happy and carefree child who would not stop smiling
and laughing and now he has been reduced to a shell of a child that he once was with his silent whispers, sunken
Page 25 of 89
eyes, and cries to go home. It's an especially sad day in America when the expectation of Officers of the Court
and Politicians resort to the kind of malicious, intentional and egregious acts of cruelty upon and citizen of the
United States of America, but especially a child... An African American male child whose life is obviously
deemed less valuable and unworthy of the life and/ or the lifestyle that these Officers of the Court and Politicians
have deemed necessary and essential in their own personal lives. Spencer (like their own children) is deserving
of a safe, loving and nurturing environment to grow up in. Spencer deserves access to a spiritual and
educational foundation that will enable him to grow into a man of character, integrity and grace.) These
reprehensibly culpably and corrupt individuals have willfully failed Spencer (at age 2, 3, 4 and now age 5), failed
me (a human being with feelings, thoughts and a life worthy of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness and not an
object to be manipulated, discarded an failed)… failed the millions of countless - nameless citizens who are
trapped in this system of oppression AND failed humanity by continuing this cyclical system of oppression
through States' Rights to Govern as it Pleases. These reprehensibly culpable and corrupt individuals deserve to be
held completely responsible and accountable for their choices and their actions but The state of Georgia will not
restore or make whole my life or that of Spencer’s life because the choice to restore our lives would mean that
the corrupt individuals who oversea our most vital system of Government would have to be held accountable for
their choice to participate in and illegally operate under Jim Crow / States' Rights to Govern as it Pleases. In as
much, the Federal Government (who has been protecting the State of Georgia Politicians and Officers of the
Court) must restore faith in our systems of Government by striking down the unlawful use of States Rights to
Govern as it Pleases so that citizens will begin to have access to the Constitutional Rights afforded to them as
citizens of the United States of America.
Finally, these same reprehensibly culpable, corrupt and shameful to their profession human beings continue to
review all of the evidence against States Rights to Govern a it Pleases weeks in and weeks out but NONE on the
State Agencies who are implicated in the corruption scandal have responded to the Complaints as of late and we
are now on the Seventeenth (17th) Amended or Updated Complaints under this Superior Court Case Number
Page 26 of 89
alone... Mind you there have been Complaints, which include evidence in the form of Exhibits that date back
several years... From the days where Chief Judge Cynthia Wright and Republican Judge Tom Campbell shared
ownership of Errors related to the First Trial (related to custody and my divorce) and Second Trial (related to the
numerous failed attempts to foreclose on my home). Additionally, Republican Judge Tom Campbell and Federal
Judge John Goger shared ownership of Errors related to my Second Trial and Third Trial (related to custody and
divorce) on the exact same issues presented with NEW EVIDENCE (Police violation of the Order and proof of
the conspiracy to deprive me of my Constitutional Rights witnesses during the Third Trial (the Police Officers
were explained the rationale for keeping Spencer away from me by Attorney Willis (That I was declared as
mentally insane by Attorney Willis without every having submitted to the forced Psychological Evaluations
((against my will) by their chosen legal colleagues who just so happen to be psychologist or just so happen to
manage the psychological facility that I have been forced to attend or again be stripped of ALL of my custody
and visitation rights with Spencer and be subjected to fifteen (15) minute harshly monitored conversations (as
Ordered by Federal Judge John Goger) but scarcely permitted by Attorney Willis)), Spencer's Medical Records
and testimony from his Pediatrician were to be entered as Trial evidence but Spencer Guardian Ad Litem
"forgot" to bring the evidence on the second Trial and Spencer's School Teacher's were Subpoenaed to Testify
during the Third Trial because again... Spencer's Guardian Ad Litem "forgot" to bring the evidence that she had
collected over a year and a half to Trial with her during the second Trial. Finally, the exact same evidence of
improper care, drug use, etc. (with different witnesses and different evidence) were presented during the First
Trial... However these States' Rights to Govern as It Pleases reprehensibly culpable corrupt and shameful to their
profession Crooks have on each… ON EVERY occasion found a way to either ignore the evidence or prevent the
evidence (Orders to Quash Subpoenas) from ever being presented in each of the three Trials… which again
directly violates my Constitutional Right to a Fair Trial AND Sadly (again), they have even resorted to varying
forms of obstruction (witness tampering, making up improper Motions, Rule Nisi's and Order's and filing them
but more often refusing to file and date stamp them with the Clerk of the Court… OR serve me via Sheriff's
Page 27 of 89
Entry of Service… OR provide for thirty (30) days from the Date of Service to respond to the Motion, Petition or
Complaint… OR even provide for a Trial hearing (as is the case of my false arrest and false incarceration for the
Felony Charge of Contempt of Court for requesting my four (4) weeks of visitation as Ordered in Federal Judge
John Goger's March 14, 2013 Final Order for example). These reprehensibly culpable, corrupt and shameful to
their profession human beings also knowingly and fully participate in retaliatory efforts to silence me…
1.
like the illegal Error of legally taking custody and visitation of Spencer away from me without legal
grounds or merit,
2.
the illegal Error of having me falsely arrested and falsely incarcerated on fraudulent Felony charges
that will impact my ability to obtain future employment, education and credit (due to background
checks) as well as impact my ability to Vote (as a convicted Felon), which is also a legal Error
because I serving ten (10) full days in custody…
3.
which is also and Error because the non-judicious ten (10) full days of incarceration as Ordered by
Federal Judge John Goger for requesting my four weeks of visitation (that I to this day have
NEVER received to this day) in his March 14, 2013 Final Order) serves as a means of retaliation
and an unprecedented duration of time and an unwarranted act of aggression on the part of the
Officer of the Court who allowed this Error to occur…
4.
and on the day of my release, I completely satisfied my sentencing requirements and completely
paid my debt to society and thus it is again Error for me to be stripped of my legal right to vote due
to the Felony charges against me.
5.
It is again Error for me to be penalized and subjected to background checks involving fair housing,
education and / or employment for housing, education and job related positions that I was eligible
for and / or experienced enough to work while incarcerated. Further, it is also Error for me to be
penalized and subjected to background checks for housing, education and job related positions that
are unrelated to the crime in which I was convicted and therefore ALL of the Constitutional Rights
Page 28 of 89
granted to me prior to my arrest and incarceration should be duly restored, as my debt to society
was fully paid upon release,
6.
or like the numerous attempts to foreclose on my home,
7.
loss of State of Georgia Employment (because "Court leave was no-longer approved" when I
appealed my case with the Georgia Supreme Court… although I used my vacation days, sick leave
and un-paid days to attend court AT NO COST OR EXPENSE to the State of Georgia),
8.
or having to bear the financial expense of litigating these fraudulently "Fair Trials" through Superior
Court, the Georgia Court of Appeals, the Georgia Supreme Court, the U.S. District Court, the U.S.
Court of Appeals, the U.S. Supreme Court, Several agencies within the Department of Justice and
on up to Attorney General Eric Holder and President Barack Obama, who to this day continues to
turn a blinds eye to…

the damaging affects of States' Rights to Govern as it Pleases not only in my life, but the countless lives
of millions if nameless citizens who have been falsely arrested, falsely incarcerated and falsely institutionalized
because they (like me) did not have access to a Fair Trial OR EVEN access to the Constitution Rights set forth in
the Constitution of the United States of America because the Racist Jim Crow - States' Rights to Govern as it
Pleases (in year 2013) “Systems” still exist as the prevailing law of the land. . For this reason and the below
listed reasons, all of Judge Goger’s Orders should be set aside in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1655, “Rule
60. Relief From A Judgment Or Order (b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or
Proceeding); wherein the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final
judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or
excusable neglect; (3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation,
or misconduct by an opposing party; (6) any other reason that justifies relief.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1983,
42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2), “which describes Obstruction of Justice”, wherein “if two or more persons
Page 29 of 89
conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the
due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal
protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to
enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws.”, 42
U.S.C. § 1985 (3), wherein “if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any
act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or
property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United
States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages
occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators”, Civil
Rights Act of 1871, Civil Rights Act of 1961, Fifth Amendment Right, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961),
Fourteenth Amendments Due Process Clause, Mugler V. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623 at 661, Sixth
Amendment”.), Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), which was enacted by
section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted
October 15, 1970), Fernandez v. United States, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63796, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. July 24,
2009), Livingston v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 759 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1985), United States v. Bohr, 406
F. Supp 1218 (E.D. Wis. 1976), United States v. Doe, 935 F. Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y. 1996), Sealed Appellant v.
Sealed Appellee, 130 F.3d 695, 697 (5th Cir.1997), Dean v. United States, 418 F. Supp. 149(E.D.N.Y. 2006);
Doe v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021(S.D.N.Y. June 29, 2004), Doe,
2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021 at *46 S.REGION BLACK L. STUDENTS ASS’NL.J. 31, 32-33 (2012), Burt
W. Griffin & Lewis R. Katz OH. FELONY SENT.L. § 5:53 (2008), Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S.
361, 365 (1989), United States v. Lucido, 612 F.3d 871, 872-73 (6th Cir. 2010), 18 U.S.C. § 1503, United
States v. McLeod, 385 F.2d 734, 747-50 (5thCir. 1967), Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. 41-3-12 (2010), GA
CODE ANN. § 9-11-4 (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(c) (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(e)(7) (2012),
Page 30 of 89
GA Code Ann § 9-11-5(f) (2012), GA CODE ANN .§ 9-3-51(a) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-22 (2012), GA
Code Ann § 9-3-31 (2012), O'Callaghan v. Bank of Eastman, 180 Ga. 812, 818 (1935), GA Code Ann 9-3-1
and 9-3-2 (2012), GA Code Ann § 44-5-163 (2012), GA Code Ann GA Code Ann § 9-11-26(b)(4)(A)(i)
(2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(b)(c)(2) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-5-7
(2012), GA Code Ann, § 9-11-30 (2012), Carruth v. Brown, 202 Ga. App. 656, 658 (1992), Huff v.
Anderson, 212 Ga. 32, 34 (1955), Pitmon v. State, 265 Ga. App. 655, 659 (2004), Giles v. Jones, 169 Ga.
App. 882 (1984), GA Constitution Case Co. v. Parker, 161 Ga. App. 614, 617 (1982), Myers v. Barnard,
180 Ga. App. 192, 193 (1986), GA Code Ann § 24-2-2 (2012), Hendrix v. Byers Bldg. Supply, Inc.,167 Ga.
App. 878, 880 (1983), Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire v. Campbell Nissan N. Am., 258 Ga. App. 767,
768 (2002), Bowen, 246 Ga. App. at 180, Chapman, 220 Ga. App. at 542 , GA Code Ann § 24-4-22 Radford
v. State, 251 Ga. 50, 53 (1983), Jones v. Krystal Co., 231 Ga. App. 102, 107 (1998), Atlanta Oculoplastic
Surgery, P.C. v. Nestlehutt 286 Ga. 731, 735-36 (2010), GA Constitution art. I, § I, para. XI(a), Porter v.
Bland, 105 Ga. App. 703, 709 (1962), Long v. Serritt, 102 Ga. App. 550, 554 -55 (1960), GA Code Ann § 5112-5.1(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(b) (2012), Suarez v. Halbert, 246 Ga. App. 822, 824 (2000),
O.C.G.A. 40-5-54.1 (2010), Georgia Code § 35-3-37, Georgia Code § 24-4-65, Georgia Code § 15-11-83.…
which are direct violations of Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. § 16-10-1: “[A]ny public officer who willfully and
intentionally violates the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished
by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years” and O.C.G.A. § 15-6-6: “[B]efore entering
on the duties of their office, superior court judges must take the oath required of all civil officers and in addition
they must take the following oath: “I swear that I will administer justice without respect to person and do
equal rights to the poor and the rich and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all
the duties incumbent on me as judge of the superior courts of this state, according to the best of my ability
and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state ability and understanding, and
agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state and the Constitution of the United States. So help me
Page 31 of 89
God.” Therefore all of the above listed Officers of the Court should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of State
and Federal laws for the above as well as the below listed Constitutional Violations.
EXHIBIT GR
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for Attorney Karlise Grier (Guardian Ad Litem)– Notes Indicate “Spoke with Jimmy
who lives here. He advised Defendant does not live at this location”. However the address provided on the
Sheriff’s Entry of Service is a business and not a home address for Attorney Karlise Grier.
EXHIBIT GS
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for Officer D. Williams (Fulton County Police - 341)– Served - Filed and date
stamped July 22, 2013
EXHIBIT GT
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for Officer G. Hightower (Fulton County Police - 225)– Served - Filed and date
stamped July 22, 2013
EXHIBIT GU
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for Officer J. Wyches (Fulton County Police - 239)– Served - Filed and date stamped
July 22, 2013
EXHIBIT GV
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for Officer E. Benefield (Fulton County Police - 209)– Served - Filed and date
stamped July 22, 2013
EXHIBIT GW Sheriff’s Entry of Service for Officer C. A. Flournory (Fulton County Police - 980)– Served - Filed and date
stamped July 22, 2013
EXHIBIT GX
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for Officer M. Voight (Atlanta Police Department)– Served - Filed and date stamped
July 22, 2013
EXHIBIT GY
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for Officer B. Crawford (Fulton County Police)– Served - Filed and date stamped
July 22, 2013
EXHIBIT GZ
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for Gean Womble (Judge Goger’s Court Reporter - for accurate and requested take
–down and transcription of Court proceedings)– Served - Filed and date stamped July 22, 2013 with a
secondary file and date stamp of June 14, 2013, which also includes the name of Carl J. Willis, II under
Defendant Served.
EXHIBIT HA
Carl J. Willis, II HUGE Advertisement Billboard from a Distance (with Height of Fence Visible)- Proof of
Income as I was unable to Subpoena (Due to Federal Judge John Goger’s Fraudulent Order that I can not file
for subpoenas with the Clerk of Superior Court without requesting permission (directly from Federal Judge
John Goger) to file and date stamp a Subpoena with the Clerk of the Court) the Billboard Company’s
Page 32 of 89
Contract with Attorney Willis to determine the income provided to the corporation or the monthly cost of
renting the highly visible Billboard.
EXHIBIT HB
Carl J. Willis, II HUGE Advertisement Billboard with a Closer view- Proof of Income as I was unable to
Subpoena (Due to Federal Judge John Goger’s Fraudulent Order that I can not file for subpoenas with the
Clerk of Superior Court without requesting permission (directly from Federal Judge John Goger) to file and
date stamp a Subpoena with the Clerk of the Court) the Billboard Company’s Contract with Attorney Willis to
determine the income provided to the corporation or the monthly cost of renting the highly visible Billboard.

On Thursday, July 18, 2013 and Wednesday, July 17, 2013, Agents at the Georgia Department of Human
Services , Division of Child Support Services wrote notes in the Child Support Portal confirming that Attorney
Willis was “somehow” required only to pay $665.40, which is three (3) months ($192.00 per month) worth of a
reduced Child Support Arrears to obtain reinstatement of his Drivers License. The payment of $665.40 or
approximately 3% of what Attorney Willis actually owes is a clear Error on the part of the State of Georgia as,
based on their own Posted rules and regulations, a minimum of 20% (EXHIBIT ) of an individuals Total Arrears
Balance is required in order to reinstate a persons Drivers License. Additionally, O.C.G.A. 40-5-54.1 (2010)
provides that… “(c) The suspension or denial of an application for issuance or renewal of a license shall be for
an indefinite period and until such person shall provide proof of compliance with an order for child support. Such
person's license shall be reinstated if the person submits proof of compliance with an order for child support from
the agency or court of competent jurisdiction and pays a restoration fee of $35.00 or $25.00 when such
reinstatement is processed by mail for the return of his or her license.”, which means that Attorney Willis was
required to satisfy the full payment or minimally the 20% required payment (according to their posted Rules) Or
obtain “proof of compliance with an order for child Support.” Allowing Attorney Willis to pay $665.40 of his
$21,314.31 (EXHIBIT ) required Child Support Arrears balance is a clear Error on the part of the State of
Georgia that should be immediately reversed in order to preserve the integrity of the laws of the State of Georgia.
Additionally, the “Unusually Named” motion titled a “Motion to Address Child Support Arrerage” (EXHIBIT
GC – a Fraudulent Motion as there is no such things as a “Motion to Address Child Support Arrearage” and
Page 33 of 89
Attorney Willis, his Council (Attorney Avis Sanders), Attorney Nicholas Sears and Judge John Goger are
licensed (EXHIBITS GD, GE, GF and GG) Trial Attorneys (first) who know and understand that they are held
to a higher standard than Pro Se litigants in a case and should have never filed a “Motion to Address Child
Support Arrearage” or issued an August 14, 2013 Rule Nisi on a “Motion to Address Child Support Arrearage
(EXHIBIT GB) AND as an experienced Trial Attorney, Attorney Carl J. Wilis, II would know not to file a
Motion for Contempt Against himself) was submitted by Officers of the Court in an effort to completely dismiss
all of Attorney Willis Child Support Obligations, which again is contrary to O.C.G.A. 40-5-54.1 (2010), which
states that a Judge can only provide an Order on whether or not a litigant is Compliant and does not provide the
legal grounds to arbitrarily dismiss ALL or EVEN ANY of a litigants Child Support Arrearage. For this reason
and the below listed reasons, all of Judge Goger’s Orders should be set aside in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §
1655, “Rule 60. Relief From A Judgment Or Order (b) Grounds for Relief from a Final
Judgment, Order, or Proceeding); wherein the court may relieve a party or its legal representative
from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence,
surprise, or excusable neglect; (3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic),
misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party; (6) any other reason that justifies
relief.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2), “which describes Obstruction of Justice”,
wherein “if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or
defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny
to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully
enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal
protection of the laws.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3), wherein “if one or more persons engaged therein
do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another
Page 34 of 89
is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of
a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the
recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the
conspirators”, Civil Rights Act of 1871, Civil Rights Act of 1961, Fifth Amendment Right, Mapp v.
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), Fourteenth Amendments Due Process Clause, Mugler V. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623
at 661, Sixth Amendment”.), Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), which was
enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted
October 15, 1970), Fernandez v. United States, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63796, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. July 24,
2009), Livingston v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 759 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1985), United States v. Bohr, 406
F. Supp 1218 (E.D. Wis. 1976), United States v. Doe, 935 F. Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y. 1996), Sealed Appellant v.
Sealed Appellee, 130 F.3d 695, 697 (5th Cir.1997), Dean v. United States, 418 F. Supp. 149(E.D.N.Y. 2006);
Doe v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021(S.D.N.Y. June 29, 2004), Doe,
2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021 at *46 S.REGION BLACK L. STUDENTS ASS’NL.J. 31, 32-33 (2012), Burt
W. Griffin & Lewis R. Katz OH. FELONY SENT.L. § 5:53 (2008), Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S.
361, 365 (1989), United States v. Lucido, 612 F.3d 871, 872-73 (6th Cir. 2010), 18 U.S.C. § 1503, United
States v. McLeod, 385 F.2d 734, 747-50 (5thCir. 1967), Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. 41-3-12 (2010), GA
CODE ANN. § 9-11-4 (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(c) (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(e)(7) (2012),
GA Code Ann § 9-11-5(f) (2012), GA CODE ANN .§ 9-3-51(a) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-22 (2012), GA
Code Ann § 9-3-31 (2012), O'Callaghan v. Bank of Eastman, 180 Ga. 812, 818 (1935), GA Code Ann 9-3-1
and 9-3-2 (2012), GA Code Ann § 44-5-163 (2012), GA Code Ann GA Code Ann § 9-11-26(b)(4)(A)(i)
(2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(b)(c)(2) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-5-7
(2012), GA Code Ann, § 9-11-30 (2012), Carruth v. Brown, 202 Ga. App. 656, 658 (1992), Huff v.
Anderson, 212 Ga. 32, 34 (1955), Pitmon v. State, 265 Ga. App. 655, 659 (2004), Giles v. Jones, 169 Ga.
Page 35 of 89
App. 882 (1984), GA Constitution Case Co. v. Parker, 161 Ga. App. 614, 617 (1982), Myers v. Barnard,
180 Ga. App. 192, 193 (1986), GA Code Ann § 24-2-2 (2012), Hendrix v. Byers Bldg. Supply, Inc.,167 Ga.
App. 878, 880 (1983), Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire v. Campbell Nissan N. Am., 258 Ga. App. 767,
768 (2002), Bowen, 246 Ga. App. at 180, Chapman, 220 Ga. App. at 542 , GA Code Ann § 24-4-22 Radford
v. State, 251 Ga. 50, 53 (1983), Jones v. Krystal Co., 231 Ga. App. 102, 107 (1998), Atlanta Oculoplastic
Surgery, P.C. v. Nestlehutt 286 Ga. 731, 735-36 (2010), GA Constitution art. I, § I, para. XI(a), Porter v.
Bland, 105 Ga. App. 703, 709 (1962), Long v. Serritt, 102 Ga. App. 550, 554 -55 (1960), GA Code Ann § 5112-5.1(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(b) (2012), Suarez v. Halbert, 246 Ga. App. 822, 824 (2000),
O.C.G.A. 40-5-54.1 (2010), Georgia Code § 35-3-37, Georgia Code § 24-4-65, Georgia Code § 15-11-83.…
which are direct violations of Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. § 16-10-1: “[A]ny public officer who willfully and
intentionally violates the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished
by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years” and O.C.G.A. § 15-6-6: “[B]efore entering
on the duties of their office, superior court judges must take the oath required of all civil officers and in addition
they must take the following oath: “I swear that I will administer justice without respect to person and do
equal rights to the poor and the rich and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all
the duties incumbent on me as judge of the superior courts of this state, according to the best of my ability
and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state ability and understanding, and
agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state and the Constitution of the United States. So help me
God.” Therefore all of the above listed Officers of the Court should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of State
and Federal laws for the above as well as the below listed Constitutional Violations.
Page 36 of 89
EXHIBIT GK
Georgia Department of Human Services, Division of Child Support Services – Passport and Driver’s License
Reinstatement (minimum 20% of total Arrears) Posted Sign.
EXHIBIT GL Georgia Department of Human Services, Division of Child Support Services – Agent Notes confirming $665.40
payment Error and $20,648.91 arrear balance.
EXHIBIT GM Sheriff’s Entry of Service for Ashley Sparks (Teacher)– Served - Filed and date stamped July 18, 2013.
EXHIBIT GN
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for Vivian Rivera (Teacher)– Served - Filed and date stamped July 18, 2013
EXHIBIT GO
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for Eric Mitchell (Woodward Academy Director) – Notes indicate “School closed for
the Summer” but their website ( http://www.woodward.edu/summer/camps/index.aspx )clearly indicates that
they are open and Spencer confirmed that he was attending summer camp there until August 2, 2013.
EXHIBIT GP
Subpoena for Eric Mitchell (Woodward Academy Director) to request Spencer’s Academic Record, School
Calendar/ Schedule, Field Trip Schedules, Volunteer Opportunities and Requirements, Copy of Admissions
Application and Teachers Contact Information (Name, Phone Number, Address).
EXHIBIT GQ
Subpoena for Genean Womble (Judge Goger’s Court Reporter) for accurate and requested take –down and
transcription of Court proceedings.

On Friday, July 12, 2013 at 5:05 PM, I finally received the requested filed and date stamped July 17,
2013 Contempt Arrest Order (EXHIBIT FC) which replaces EXHIBIT DR) from Attorney Sears (Judge
Goger’s Staff Attorney) via email (EXHIBIT FB) as well as Attorney Carl J. Willis (Spencer’s Father)
“Unusually Named” motion titled a “Motion to Address Child Support Arrerage” (EXHIBIT GC – a Fraudulent
Motion as there is no such things as a “Motion to Address Child Support Arrearage” and Attorney Willis, his
Council (Attorney Avis Sanders), Attorney Nicholas Sears and Judge John Goger are licensed (EXHIBITS GD,
GE, GF and GG) Trial Attorneys (first) who know and understand that they are held to a higher standard than
Pro Se litigants in a case and should have never filed a “Motion to Address Child Support Arrearage” or issued
an August 14, 2013 Rule Nisi on a “Motion to Address Child Support Arrearage (EXHIBIT GB) AND as an
experienced Trial Attorney, Attorney Carl J. Wilis, II would know not to file a Motion for Contempt Against
himself)…
Page 37 of 89
o However, I did not file yet another Motion for Contempt Against Attorney Willis for his failure
to Pay over $17, 000 in back Child Support because he has never found in Contempt by Chief
Judge Cynthia Wright or Republican Judge Tom Campbell for his failure to pay Child Support or
ANY other violation outlined in the form of a Motion For Contempt.
o Thereafter, I narrowed my scope of issues and concerns to exclude Child Support Arrears and
focusing on issues related to Spencer’s Best Interest in the filed and date stamped Motions for
Contempt (EXHIBIT BS), which should have been addressed in July 3, 2013 Order (EXHIBIT
EZ)… as the purpose the Child Support Hearing and Order (all Denied) was to address issues
related to Child Support.
o Now Judge John Goger has taken the “Unusual” step (Via Order) of Denying me the right to File
ANY MOTION FOR CONTEMPT, Petition for Change of Custody or Subpoenas to preserve the
testimony of witnessed without submitting a “Motion to Request to File” (EXHIBIT FA) or in
essence requesting PERMISION from Judge Goger to hear the case before the case is heard via a
legitimate trial.
o Which again, I find it an odd notion that a citizen of the United States of America would have to
request permission from a Judge to hear a case prior to a Judge actually hearing a case via a
Trial…
In summation, Judge Goger Denied my Motion Request to File a Motion, Petition and Subpoenas via the
July 11, 2013 Order Denying Request to File (EXHIBIT GI) and Dismissed the Third (3rd) Trial via the
July 8, 2013 Order on Contempt and Dismissing Case (EXHIBIT FX) without my ability to present the
evidence in the form of testimony from witness (EXHIBITS FE, FG, FH, FI, FJ, FK, FL, FM, FO, FP,
FQ, FR, FS and FT)… which are in fact related to the exact same evidence that should have been
presented during the second Trial had…
Page 38 of 89
1. Spencer’s Guardian Ad Litem (Attorney Karlise Grier) not “Forgotten” to bring the evidence that
she has collected over the course of a year and a half during our February 26, 2013 (EXHIBITS
BD, BE and BQ) Second Trial;
2. Spencer’s Teachers testimony (See EXHIBITS CH, CI and FU along with all other quashed
subpoenas (EXHIBIT EZ)) had not been Quashed by Judge Goger (I witnessed Attorney /
Guardian Ad Litem entering Judge Goger’s backroom Chambers surrounded by what I presume
were Attorney’s and Vivian Rivera leaving Judge Goger’s backroom Chambers on June 26, 2013,
the first date that they were to submit Deposition Testimony. Also, I can assure you that they
were not in the backroom Chambers meeting with Attorney Carl J. Willis (Spencer’s Father or
Attorney Avis Sander (Counsel for Attorney Willis) because they chose not to show up that day
for the thirty (30) day Status Conference hearing (Heard by Magistrate Judge Jane Cook) and / or
Judge John Goger had not chosen to Quash (EXHIBIT EZ) all of the other witness subpoenas…
3. including the subpoenas for the Police Officers and Sheriffs that were scheduled to testify that
they were a witness to the fact that Attorney Willis was in violation of Judge Goger’s
(EXHIBITS CX (Police CAD REPORT), DA and DB) March 14, 2013 Final Order (EXHIBIT
BZ) on numerous occasions
4. as well as Subpoenas for Attorney Willis (related to Spencer’s School and Activity Schedule, Ms.
Sonya (who has been keeping Spencer EXHIBIT DH) and Attorney Willis continued violation of
Judge Goger’s Orders which permits me to speak with Spencer (EXHIBIT FV) as well as deprive
Spencer of the Right to even receive Care Packages from me (EXHIBIT FW)… which I have
been forced to resort to because I have been legal stripped of all of my parental rights… including
the right to see Spencer (Per Judge Goger’s .
Page 39 of 89
5. Please also see (EXHIBITS FE, FG, FH, FI, FJ, FK, FL, FM, FO, FP, FQ, FR, FS and FT)
for proof of Sheriffs Entry of Service for all of the Subpoenaed witnesses, Motion for Contempt
and Summons.
6. Also note also that the issue of Back Child Support was addressed via Response Motion for
Change of Custody (EXHIBIT BB) during the Second Trial on February 26, 2013 (EXHIBIT
BQ) and our subsequent Hearing on Child Support on May 20, 2013 (EXHIBIT CD). Note also
that Judge Goger intentionally chose not to include the Child Support Arrearage or back Child
Support in his March 14, 2013 Final Order (EXHIBIT BX) or his recently emailed July 3, 2013
Final Order on Child Support and Attorney’s Fees (EXHIBIT GA), which was emailed by
Attorney Sears on Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 2:47 PM (EXHIBIT FZ) but provided by
Attorney Avis Sanders (verbatim) via email on Wednesday, March 6, 2013 and again on
Thursday, March 7, 2013 (EXHIBIT FY, which…
1. did not provide an accurate account of Attorney Willis earnings as a Trial Attorney
($30,000) or my earnings (stated as $15,080 but proven as less than that during the Trial
with the requirement that I pay approximately $800.00 per month (includes Spencer’s
Medical Expenses that I currently pay and have paid since prior to Spencer’s birth) in
Child Support (EXHIBITS AV and GA) to Attorney Willis…
2. although the $15,080 stated income breaks down to me earning $1,256.66 per month.
3. It should also be noted that my earning potential was diminished even more when Judge
Goger made the non judicious decision to have me falsely arrested and falsely
incarcerated for the Felony Charge of requesting my right to four (4) weeks of visitation
as Ordered in his March 14, 2013 Final Order… because I can no-longer pass Background
Checks for employment, housing, credit, etc..).
Page 40 of 89

Finally, note that (again) that Judge John Goger Denied my right to file Motions, Petitions and Subpoenas
and Dismissed the Third (3rd) Trial because “She does not allege facts sufficient to show that a material change
of circumstances has occurred” (EXHIBIT FX)… and yet Judge Goger continues to Deny (via Orders) all of the
evidence that should have been and still should be presented (via a Trial) to support the material change of
circumstances. Judge John Goger’s decision to completely ignore Federal Law and even completely ignore
Georgia Law (EXAMPLE, a response to a Summons (EXHIBIT FQ) must be provided within thirty (30) days
of a case filing OR THE CASE MUST BE GRANTED to the filing individual BY DEFAULT). Please see the
below list of additional Georgia Law Violations. Blatantly ignoring not only Federal Law but State Law violates
all rights that I have as a resident of the State of Georgia and a Citizen of the United States of America. Also not
the long list of Other State and Federal Entities that have assisted the corrupt Judges with Violating my State and
Federal Rights EXHIBITS BV BW and EXHIBIT GJ) for example. For this reason and the below listed
reasons, all of Judge Goger’s Orders should be set aside in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1655, “Rule 60.
Relief From A Judgment Or Order (b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or
Proceeding); wherein the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final
judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or
excusable neglect; (3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation,
or misconduct by an opposing party; (6) any other reason that justifies relief.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1983,
42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2), “which describes Obstruction of Justice”, wherein “if two or more persons
conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the
due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal
protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to
enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws.”, 42
Page 41 of 89
U.S.C. § 1985 (3), wherein “if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any
act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or
property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United
States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages
occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators”, Civil
Rights Act of 1871, Civil Rights Act of 1961, Fifth Amendment Right, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961),
Fourteenth Amendments Due Process Clause, Mugler V. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623 at 661, Sixth
Amendment”.), Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), which was enacted by
section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted
October 15, 1970), Fernandez v. United States, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63796, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. July 24,
2009), Livingston v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 759 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1985), United States v. Bohr, 406
F. Supp 1218 (E.D. Wis. 1976), United States v. Doe, 935 F. Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y. 1996), Sealed Appellant v.
Sealed Appellee, 130 F.3d 695, 697 (5th Cir.1997), Dean v. United States, 418 F. Supp. 149(E.D.N.Y. 2006);
Doe v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021(S.D.N.Y. June 29, 2004), Doe,
2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021 at *46 S.REGION BLACK L. STUDENTS ASS’NL.J. 31, 32-33 (2012), Burt
W. Griffin & Lewis R. Katz OH. FELONY SENT.L. § 5:53 (2008), Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S.
361, 365 (1989), United States v. Lucido, 612 F.3d 871, 872-73 (6th Cir. 2010), 18 U.S.C. § 1503, United
States v. McLeod, 385 F.2d 734, 747-50 (5thCir. 1967), Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. 41-3-12 (2010), GA
CODE ANN. § 9-11-4 (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(c) (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(e)(7) (2012),
GA Code Ann § 9-11-5(f) (2012), GA CODE ANN .§ 9-3-51(a) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-22 (2012), GA
Code Ann § 9-3-31 (2012), O'Callaghan v. Bank of Eastman, 180 Ga. 812, 818 (1935), GA Code Ann 9-3-1
and 9-3-2 (2012), GA Code Ann § 44-5-163 (2012), GA Code Ann GA Code Ann § 9-11-26(b)(4)(A)(i)
(2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(b)(c)(2) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-5-7
Page 42 of 89
(2012), GA Code Ann, § 9-11-30 (2012), Carruth v. Brown, 202 Ga. App. 656, 658 (1992), Huff v.
Anderson, 212 Ga. 32, 34 (1955), Pitmon v. State, 265 Ga. App. 655, 659 (2004), Giles v. Jones, 169 Ga.
App. 882 (1984), GA Constitution Case Co. v. Parker, 161 Ga. App. 614, 617 (1982), Myers v. Barnard,
180 Ga. App. 192, 193 (1986), GA Code Ann § 24-2-2 (2012), Hendrix v. Byers Bldg. Supply, Inc.,167 Ga.
App. 878, 880 (1983), Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire v. Campbell Nissan N. Am., 258 Ga. App. 767,
768 (2002), Bowen, 246 Ga. App. at 180, Chapman, 220 Ga. App. at 542 , GA Code Ann § 24-4-22 Radford
v. State, 251 Ga. 50, 53 (1983), Jones v. Krystal Co., 231 Ga. App. 102, 107 (1998), Atlanta Oculoplastic
Surgery, P.C. v. Nestlehutt 286 Ga. 731, 735-36 (2010), GA Constitution art. I, § I, para. XI(a), Porter v.
Bland, 105 Ga. App. 703, 709 (1962), Long v. Serritt, 102 Ga. App. 550, 554 -55 (1960), GA Code Ann § 5112-5.1(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(b) (2012), Suarez v. Halbert, 246 Ga. App. 822, 824 (2000),
O.C.G.A. 40-5-54.1 (2010), Georgia Code § 35-3-37, Georgia Code § 24-4-65, Georgia Code § 15-11-83.…
which are direct violations of Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. § 16-10-1: “[A]ny public officer who willfully and
intentionally violates the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished
by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years” and O.C.G.A. § 15-6-6: “[B]efore entering
on the duties of their office, superior court judges must take the oath required of all civil officers and in addition
they must take the following oath: “I swear that I will administer justice without respect to person and do
equal rights to the poor and the rich and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all
the duties incumbent on me as judge of the superior courts of this state, according to the best of my ability
and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state ability and understanding, and
agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state and the Constitution of the United States. So help me
God.” Therefore all of the above listed Officers of the Court should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of State
and Federal laws for the above as well as the below listed Constitutional Violations.

In the previously mentioned grounds provided as the Motive for the Constitutional Violations, I failed
to include the following Errors to Support additional State and Federal Constitutional Violations as provided by
Page 43 of 89
the Fulton County Sheriff's Office Inmate Handbook (EXHIBIT GH as Exerts) and located online in its entirely
here… https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/92394114/Fulton%20County%20Inmate%20Handbook.pdf as
follows…
1. Inmates are entitled to one free call. However, the free call only provided time enough
(after processing) to say "Hello, I'm fine and I'm in Fulton"… before the phone
disconnects and requests a credit card payment. If in inmates family does not have access
to a credit card then the inmates cannot set up a phone account for payment.
a. Having no access to phone privileges deprived me of my Right to a Fair Trial
because I had NO MEANS of communicating my case information to my family
members (who were feverishly working to try to get them out) for FREE.
2. My family set up a Nasdaq Stock Market Traded Securus Technologies, Inc. Phone
Company (https://www.securustech.net/ ) account at the rate of $20.00 per 15 minute
call and had to speak with me at-least 2-3 times per day to obtain and exchange case
information (a $40.00 - $60.00 per day bill). Clearly, it does not cost the greedy corporate
entity that is profiting off of often poor inmates and prisoners such exorbitant fees to
record and track inmate and prisoner conversations.
a. Having no access to extortionate phone privileges deprived me of my Liberty
because I was forced to absorb un-due phone expenses related to Judge Goger’s
Decision to have me falsely arrested and falsely incarcerated (EXHIBIT FC).
3. I did not have access to a Public Defender as requested due to the large number of
incarcerated individuals and the Public Defenders caseload. I was Deprived of my
Liberty because I could not have access to a Public Defender and ended up serving the
entire ten (10) days of incarceration because Judge John Goger did not set a Bond
(EXHIBIT FC) and I was not allowed a First Appearance (EXHIBIT FC- Inmates with
Page 44 of 89
Orders issued by a Superior Court Judge do not have the right to a First Appearance and
are not issued a Ticket so you are unaware of the Charges against you unless you have
the foresight to ask for a copy of the Arrest Order while the Sheriffs are taking you into
custody) for the Felony Charge of Contempt (EXHIBIT FC) for Requesting my four
weeks of visitation as Ordered in his March 14, 2013 Final Order (EXHIBIT BX) and I
did not have access to a Public Defender to Request a Bond, First Appearance or Early
Release.
a. Having no access to a Public Defender, Bond, Library Services or First
Appearance Deprived me of my Liberty and I was forced to serve the full ten (10)
days due to Judge Goger’s Decision to have me falsely arrested and falsely
incarcerated (EXHIBIT FC).
4. I did not have access to my one Family Visit per week (Page 32 through 33) until I was
permanently housed (I was in the holding cell located in the booking area for a day before
I was housed due to overcrowding (I believe... Who knows) and in jail for nine (9) days...
"you may receive your first visit on, or after the following Monday" and in accordance
with the Visitation Schedule Days which list also list the Floors. I arrived at the Jail on
Friday June 14 at 10:00 AM, was processed and housed at 6:00 AM the following day of
Saturday, June 15. According to the visitation schedule, my area (1 North 600) could
have visitation on Fridays. However, in accordance with the rules, visitation would not be
available to me until Friday, June 28, 2013 and of course I was released with ten (10)
days served on Monday June 24, 2013 at 10:30 AM (per Judge Goger's Arrest Order for
Contempt (EXHIBIT FC) of Court for requesting four (4) weeks of visitation with
Spencer as Ordered in Judge Goger’s March 14, 2013 Final Order (EXHIBIT BX).
Without visitation from Family Members, I was restricted to extortionate phone
Page 45 of 89
communication fees, which limited my ability to file the Thirteenth (13th) Complaint with
the United Stated Department of Justice – Civil Rights Division, which is quoted in
stating… “The circumstances you describe do not indicate a violation of a federal civil
rights statute” (EXHIBIT GJ) and “Since you believe your rights have been violated,
you may wish to retain a private attorney. However, if you lack the necessary funds, you
may wish to contact the nearest legal aid or public defender’s office…” EXHIBIT GJ).
a. In essence, I was Deprived of my rights again because I did not have proper
access to family members who could properly work on the Complaint, no access
to a Private Attorney (I have been Pro Se for Years due to the cost of litigation),
no access to a Public Defender, no Bond, no access to Library Services, no First
Appearance and no way to get out of jail to properly work of the Complaint
(EXHIBIT GJ) that Attorney General Eric Holder and Attorney / President
Obama’s U.S. Department of Justice – Civil Rights Division refers to.
b. In essence, I was stuck with whatever made up Jim Crow/ States Rights to Govern
as it Pleases laws via Orders that Judge John Goger presented as the rationally for
charging me with the Felony Charge of Contempt (EXHIBIT FC) for requesting
my four (4) weeks of visitation as Ordered in his March 14, 2013 Final Order
EXHIBIT BX).
c. The notion that the Federal Government (EXHIBIT GJ) would continue to allow
States Rights to Govern as it Pleases as the preferred law above the Constitution
of the United Stated of America resulted in the deprivation of my Liberty and will
have monumental and catastrophic affects of my Liberty as the Felony Charge for
Contempt (EXHIBIT FC) for requesting four weeks of visitation with Spencer as
Provided in Judge Goger's Order (EXHIBIT BX) will cost me my employment,
Page 46 of 89
future employment and educational opportunities because I will no longer be able
to pass a background checks. Additionally, the affect of Judge John Goger’s
decision (Error / Crime) to have me falsely arrested and falsely incarcerated will
also have monumental and catastrophic affects in my private life because as a
Convicted Felony, I will not be able to pass background Checks for housing,
credit or any other opportunities presented to non Felons.
5. Page 18- 23 outlines the Mail Procedures. The summation is that you have to have
money in order to purchase paper, pencils and postage. As I was sentenced to ten (10)
days in Jail, I did not meet the requirement for being declared indigent (fourteen (14)
days) and I did not have access to 5 privileged (related to court proceedings and
insufficient for court filings) and 5 non privileged (family) mailings per month.
a. Having no access to Mail privileges deprived me of my Right to a Fair Trial
because I had NO MEANS of communicating my case information to my family
members (who were feverishly working to try to get them out) for FREE.

In summation, I was completely deprived of all of my Liberty while incarcerated and I had no
means to escape the Jim Crow / States Rights to Govern as It Pleases law of the land. I have been Deprived of
my Constitutional Rights because NO OTHER Attorney, Officer of the Court and especially not a JUDGE
WILL RULE against another Judge and the Judges, Justices and Politicians in this State are controlling every
aspect of my life… including where or not Attorney Willis is actually required to pay for his Child Support
Arrears (as Ordered)… to whether or not I can have School and Medical information regarding Spencer, the
child that I carried, gave birth to and financially supported and still financially support to this day. I have been
deprived of my Constitutional Rights, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness because I have had to spend years of my
life, hundreds of thousands of wasting tax payer money and hundreds of thousands of dollars of my (via my
families) money unnecessarily litigating all of the cases in Superior Court, the Georgia Supreme Court, the U.S.
Page 47 of 89
District Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals, U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Department of Justice (EXHIBIT
GJ) so far… only to find that the recommended relief for the Constitutional Violations is always to file a lawsuit
against the individuals who have violated my Constitutional Rights… a legal maneuver urged by Attorney’s
Judges and the FBI because filing a law suit against these Crooked individuals provides Immunity from
additional State and Federal Prosecution (Double Jeopardy Clause) and ultimately a means to continue
committing their intentional, malicious and egregious Errors or Crimes. It is without hesitation that I
respectfully request that the Federal Government strike down States Rights to Govern as it Pleases because it
deprives me of my Constitutional Right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. . For this reason and the
below listed reasons, all of Judge Goger’s Orders should be set aside in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1655,
“Rule 60. Relief From A Judgment Or Order (b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment,
Order, or Proceeding); wherein the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a
final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence,
surprise, or excusable neglect; (3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic),
misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party; (6) any other reason that justifies
relief.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2), “which describes Obstruction of Justice”,
wherein “if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or
defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny
to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully
enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal
protection of the laws.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3), wherein “if one or more persons engaged therein
do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another
is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of
Page 48 of 89
a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the
recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the
conspirators”, Civil Rights Act of 1871, Civil Rights Act of 1961, Fifth Amendment Right, Mapp v.
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), Fourteenth Amendments Due Process Clause, Mugler V. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623
at 661, Sixth Amendment”.), Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), which was
enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted
October 15, 1970), Fernandez v. United States, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63796, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. July 24,
2009), Livingston v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 759 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1985), United States v. Bohr, 406
F. Supp 1218 (E.D. Wis. 1976), United States v. Doe, 935 F. Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y. 1996), Sealed Appellant v.
Sealed Appellee, 130 F.3d 695, 697 (5th Cir.1997), Dean v. United States, 418 F. Supp. 149(E.D.N.Y. 2006);
Doe v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021(S.D.N.Y. June 29, 2004), Doe,
2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021 at *46 S.REGION BLACK L. STUDENTS ASS’NL.J. 31, 32-33 (2012), Burt
W. Griffin & Lewis R. Katz OH. FELONY SENT.L. § 5:53 (2008), Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S.
361, 365 (1989), United States v. Lucido, 612 F.3d 871, 872-73 (6th Cir. 2010), 18 U.S.C. § 1503, United
States v. McLeod, 385 F.2d 734, 747-50 (5thCir. 1967), Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. 41-3-12 (2010), GA
CODE ANN. § 9-11-4 (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(c) (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(e)(7) (2012),
GA Code Ann § 9-11-5(f) (2012), GA CODE ANN .§ 9-3-51(a) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-22 (2012), GA
Code Ann § 9-3-31 (2012), O'Callaghan v. Bank of Eastman, 180 Ga. 812, 818 (1935), GA Code Ann 9-3-1
and 9-3-2 (2012), GA Code Ann § 44-5-163 (2012), GA Code Ann GA Code Ann § 9-11-26(b)(4)(A)(i)
(2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(b)(c)(2) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-5-7
(2012), GA Code Ann, § 9-11-30 (2012), Carruth v. Brown, 202 Ga. App. 656, 658 (1992), Huff v.
Anderson, 212 Ga. 32, 34 (1955), Pitmon v. State, 265 Ga. App. 655, 659 (2004), Giles v. Jones, 169 Ga.
App. 882 (1984), GA Constitution Case Co. v. Parker, 161 Ga. App. 614, 617 (1982), Myers v. Barnard,
180 Ga. App. 192, 193 (1986), GA Code Ann § 24-2-2 (2012), Hendrix v. Byers Bldg. Supply, Inc.,167 Ga.
Page 49 of 89
App. 878, 880 (1983), Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire v. Campbell Nissan N. Am., 258 Ga. App. 767,
768 (2002), Bowen, 246 Ga. App. at 180, Chapman, 220 Ga. App. at 542 , GA Code Ann § 24-4-22 Radford
v. State, 251 Ga. 50, 53 (1983), Jones v. Krystal Co., 231 Ga. App. 102, 107 (1998), Atlanta Oculoplastic
Surgery, P.C. v. Nestlehutt 286 Ga. 731, 735-36 (2010), GA Constitution art. I, § I, para. XI(a), Porter v.
Bland, 105 Ga. App. 703, 709 (1962), Long v. Serritt, 102 Ga. App. 550, 554 -55 (1960), GA Code Ann § 5112-5.1(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(b) (2012), Suarez v. Halbert, 246 Ga. App. 822, 824 (2000),
O.C.G.A. 40-5-54.1 (2010), Georgia Code § 35-3-37, Georgia Code § 24-4-65, Georgia Code § 15-11-83.…
which are direct violations of Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. § 16-10-1: “[A]ny public officer who willfully and
intentionally violates the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished
by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years” and O.C.G.A. § 15-6-6: “[B]efore entering
on the duties of their office, superior court judges must take the oath required of all civil officers and in addition
they must take the following oath: “I swear that I will administer justice without respect to person and do
equal rights to the poor and the rich and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all
the duties incumbent on me as judge of the superior courts of this state, according to the best of my ability
and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state ability and understanding, and
agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state and the Constitution of the United States. So help me
God.” Therefore all of the above listed Officers of the Court should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of State
and Federal laws for the above as well as the below listed Constitutional Violations.
EXHIBIT FB
Yahoo Email from Attorney Nicholas Sears – Friday, July 12, 2013 at 5:05 PM to provide a filed and date
stamped copy of Judge Goger’s June 17, 2013 Contempt Arrest Order
Page 50 of 89
EXHIBIT FC
Filed and date stamped copy of Judge Goger’s June 17, 2013 Contempt Arrest Order
EXHIBIT FD
Yahoo Email to the Fulton County Judges, Staff Attorney’s, Judicial Assistants, Court Reporters,
Polices Officers, Sheriffs, Atlanta Police Officers and Ben Hill Teachers notifying them that they have
been Subpoenaed and attaching a copy of the Subpoena that they would receive and be requested to
sign for via Sheriff’s Entry of Service. – Wednesday, June 12, 2013 at 1:55 PM
EXHIBIT FE
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for Attorney Karlise Gier – Could not be located at her office. – Filed and
date stamped June 20, 2013
EXHIBIT FF
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for Ashley Sparks (Spencer’s Teacher) – Served- Filed and Date
stamped June 25, 2013
EXHIBIT FG
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for Vivian Rivera (Spencer’s Teacher) – Served – Filed and Date
Stamped June 14, 2013
EXHIBIT FH
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for D. Williams (339) (Fulton County Police Officer– Delivered –
Filed and Date Stamped June 25, 2013
EXHIBIT FI
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for D. Williamson (341) (Fulton County Police Officer– Delivered
– Filed and Date Stamped June 25, 2013
EXHIBIT FJ
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for G. Hightower (225) (Fulton County Police Officer– Delivered –
Filed and Date Stamped June 25, 2013
EXHIBIT FK
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for J. Wyches (239) (Fulton County Police Officer– Delivered –
Filed and Date Stamped June 25, 2013
EXHIBIT FL
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for E. Benefield (209) (Fulton County Police Officer– Delivered –
Filed and Date Stamped June 25, 2013
EXHIBIT FM
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for Investigator C.A. Flournory (980) (Fulton County Police Officer–
Delivered – Filed and Date Stamped June 25, 2013
EXHIBIT FN
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for M. Voight (339) (Atlanta Police Officer)– Unable to Deliver
Court Date Expired– Filed and Date Stamped June 28, 2013
EXHIBIT FO
Sheriff’s Entry of Service for B. Crawford (Fulton County Courthouse Sheriff)– Served –
Filed and Date Stamped June 10, 2013
Page 51 of 89
EXHIBIT FP
Attorney Carl J. Willis, II (Spencer’s Father) – Served (Third Trial)- Filed and Date Stamped June 5,
2013
EXHIBIT FQ
Fulton County Superior Court Summons, which stipulates that if Attorney Willis did not file a
response to the Complaint (Third Trial) then “Judgment by Default will be taken against you for the
Relief Demanded in the Complaint”. – Served, Filed and Date Stamped with the Clerk of the Court on
June 4, 2013.
EXHIBIT FR
Attorney Carl J. Willis, II (Spencer’s Father Subpoena for Information on Ms. Sonya, New School and
Medical Record) – Not Served due to Date Passed- Filed and Date Stamped June 10, 2013
EXHIBIT FS
Sheriff’s Entry of Service- Genean Womble (Judge John J. Goger’s Court Reporter) –
Issued but Never Returned
EXHIBIT FT
Sheriff’s Entry of Service- Woodward Academy (Spencer’s Third School) – Issued but
Never Returned
EXHIBIT FU
Yahoo Email from Ben Hill United Methodist Church Huenita Pierce – Wednesday, April 4,
2013 at 9:47 AM – Notice to Parents that Ms. Menyuan Smith and Ms. Ashley Sparks
wanted to meet with Spencer’s Pre K Classroom Parents to explain why the school issued a
Cease and Desist and Criminal Trespass Warrant (the explanation was that I was mentally
insane and that they were protecting the children by calling the police to attempt to have me
arrested based on Judge John Goger’s March 14, 2013 Order).
EXHIBIT FV
Yahoo Email from Attorney Carl J. Willis, II – Saturday, July 13, 2013 at 8:30 PM, 8:21
PM, 7:10 PM and 6:48 PM – Proof of my failed requests to speak with Spencer, rejected care
packages and responses from Attorney Carl J. Willis, II.
EXHIBIT FW
United Stated Postal Service Tracking Confirmation (70131090000239293955) for Spencer’s
Care Package
EXHIBIT FX
Filed and date stamped copy of Judge Goger’s June 8, 2013 Order on Contempt and
Dismissing Case – Sent via email on Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 2:47 PM by Attorney
Sears.
EXHIBIT FY
Yahoo Email from Attorney Avis Sanders (Attorney Willis Attorney) and my responses –
Thursday, March 7, 2013 at 11:07 AM and 11:05 AM as well as Wednesday, March 6, 2013
at 7:25 PM and 6:49 PM– Proof that Attorney Sanders emailed the exact same proposed
Page 52 of 89
EXHIBIT FZ
Yahoo Email from Attorney Nicholas Sears – Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 2:47 PM– Proof
of when Attorney Sears actually provided the Order on Child Support and Attorney’s Fees,
Order Denying my Motion to Request to File Motions, Petitions and Subpoenas as well as
Proof that Attorney Sears provided a Rule Nisi on the “unusual” Motion to Address Child
Support Arrearage” (that should really have been a Motion for Contempt Against Attorney
Willis filed by me) prior to emailing a “Motion to Address Child Support Arrerage on July
12, 2013 at 5:05 PM… after I pointed out that I never received a Motion, was never served,
did not received thirty (30) days to respond to what should actually be a Motion for
Contempt against Attorney Willis filed by me.
EXHIBIT GA
Filed and date stamped copy of Judge Goger’s July 3, 2013 Final Order on Child Support
and Attorney’s Fees – Sent via email on Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 2:47 PM by Attorney
Sears.
EXHIBIT GB
Copy of Judge Goger’s Rule Nisi for Attorney Willis unusual “Motion to Address Child
Support Arrears” that should really be a Motion for Contempt filed against Attorney Willis
by me – Not filed and date stamped by Attorney Sears but Sent via email on Wednesday,
July 10, 2013 at 2:47 PM by Attorney Sears.
EXHIBIT GC
Filed and date stamped copy of Attorney Carl J. Willis July 10, 2013 “Motion to Address
Child Support Arrerage” which should actually be a Motion for Contempt against him filed
by me and not the other way around – Sent via email on Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 5:05
PM by Attorney Sears.
EXHIBIT GD
Proof that Judge John James Goger, Judge, Superior Court, Atlanta Circuit actually has a
Bar License, Attended Law School, has been practicing for forty (40) years and should have
mastered a great understanding of the Constitution of the United States of America by now.
EXHIBIT GE
Proof that Attorney Sears, Staff Attorney for Judge John J. Goger actually has a Bar License, Attended
Law School, has been practicing for less than two (2) years now, which should ultimately explain why
he should be well versed in Legal Ethics (as he just recently passed the course) and the Sword Oath of
Office that all Attorneys must take and abide by.
EXHIBIT GF
Proof that Attorney Avis Sanders (Attorney for Attorney Willis), actually has a Bar License,
Attended Law School, has been practicing for more than twenty-five (25) years now and
Page 53 of 89
should have mastered a great understanding of the Constitution of the United States of
America by now.
EXHIBIT GG
Proof that Attorney Carl J. Willlis, II (Spencer’s Father), actually has a Bar License,
Attended Law School, has been practicing for more than ten (10) years now as a Criminal
Defense Trial Attorney and should have mastered a great understanding of the Constitution
of the United States of America by now.
EXHIBIT GH
Fulton County Sheriff’s Office Inmate Handbook
EXHIBIT GI
Filed and date stamped copy of Judge J. Goger’s July 11, 2013 Order Denying Request to
File (Motions, Petitions and Subpoena’s with the Clerk of the Court) – Sent via email on
Thursday, July 11, 2013 by Attorney Sears.
EXHIBIT GJ
United Stated Department of Justice – Civil Rights Division June 26, 2013 response (after
thirteen (13) Complaints over the course of a year and a half in this case alone). – “The
Circumstances you describe to not indicate a violation of a federal civil rights statute”.

On July 1, 2013 after 5:00 PM, I was notified by Attorney Sears (EXHIBIT EY) that our June 3, 2013
Court Hearing on a Motion for Contempt against Attorney Willis for violating my right to see and speak with
Spencer would be moved from 2:00 PM to 11:30 AM, a time in which none of the Trial witnesses would be
present (per Subpoena). Then on June 3, 2013, Judge Goger Quashed all of the witness Deposition Subpoenas
(EXHIBIT EZ) that were scheduled for 2:00 PM during our 11:30 AM Motion for Contempt against Attorney
Willis hearing without a Motion to Quash Subpoena’s from Attorney Willis (or any other witness), without
Sheriff’s Entry of Service, without providing thirty (30) days to provide a response Motion on a Motion to Quash
Subpoena and without a Rule Nisi Notice to hear the Motion to Quash Subpoena.
a. Prior to Judge Goger’s non Judicious decision to Quash Subpoenas for all of the witnesses, I
requested that Judge Goger recess the hearing until 2:00 PM (when the witnesses were scheduled
to arrive) so that I could request testimony in lieu of Depositions but Judge Goger denied the
Page 54 of 89
request for Depositions and Testimony… stating that I would need a Witness Subpoena and not a
Deposition Subpoena for general testimony at a hearing.
b. As a last resort, I presented and entered into evidence the Fulton County Police CAD Report,
which specifies the date and times that Attorney Willis was in violation of the Order and then
Judge Goger promptly used his discernment (based on today’s attached Order to Quash witness
Deposition Subpoenas and not allow witness Testimony without a Witness Subpoena) to
determine that Attorney Willis actions were not willful.

Attorney Sears and Judge Goger’s non judicious “Discernment” to completely ignore the existing
Rule Nisi, which provided the date of June 3, 2013 and time of 2:00 PM for the Motion for Contempt Hearing
against Attorney Willis, the non judicious decision to Quash the Depositions, the non judicious decision to refuse
to recess the hearing to provide the opportunity for the witnesses to testify because Deposition and not Witness
Subpoenas were issued and then completely ignoring the Fulton County Police Report CAD report, which
specified the dates and times that Attorney Willis was in violation of the Order violated my Constitutional Right
to a Fair Trial. . For this reason and the below listed reasons, all of Judge Goger’s Orders should be set aside in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1655, “Rule 60. Relief From A Judgment Or Order (b) Grounds for
Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding); wherein the court may relieve a party or its
legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1)
mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (3) fraud (whether previously called
intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party; (6) any other
reason that justifies relief.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2), “which describes
Obstruction of Justice”, wherein “if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding,
hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or
Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or
Page 55 of 89
his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of
persons, to the equal protection of the laws.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3), wherein “if one or more
persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such
conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and
exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived
may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation,
against any one or more of the conspirators”, Civil Rights Act of 1871, Civil Rights Act of 1961, Fifth
Amendment Right, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), Fourteenth Amendments Due Process Clause,
Mugler V. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623 at 661, Sixth Amendment”.), Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act (RICO), which was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of
1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted October 15, 1970), Fernandez v. United States, 2009 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 63796, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. July 24, 2009), Livingston v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 759 F.2d 74
(D.C. Cir. 1985), United States v. Bohr, 406 F. Supp 1218 (E.D. Wis. 1976), United States v. Doe, 935 F.
Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y. 1996), Sealed Appellant v. Sealed Appellee, 130 F.3d 695, 697 (5th Cir.1997), Dean v.
United States, 418 F. Supp. 149(E.D.N.Y. 2006); Doe v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 2004 U.S.
Dist. Lexis 12021(S.D.N.Y. June 29, 2004), Doe, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021 at *46 S.REGION BLACK L.
STUDENTS ASS’NL.J. 31, 32-33 (2012), Burt W. Griffin & Lewis R. Katz OH. FELONY SENT.L. § 5:53
(2008), Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361, 365 (1989), United States v. Lucido, 612 F.3d 871, 872-73
(6th Cir. 2010), 18 U.S.C. § 1503, United States v. McLeod, 385 F.2d 734, 747-50 (5thCir. 1967), Georgia
Statutes O.C.G.A. 41-3-12 (2010), GA CODE ANN. § 9-11-4 (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(c) (2012),
GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(e)(7) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-5(f) (2012), GA CODE ANN .§ 9-3-51(a)
(2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-22 (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-31 (2012), O'Callaghan v. Bank of Eastman,
180 Ga. 812, 818 (1935), GA Code Ann 9-3-1 and 9-3-2 (2012), GA Code Ann § 44-5-163 (2012), GA Code
Page 56 of 89
Ann GA Code Ann § 9-11-26(b)(4)(A)(i) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-1134(b)(c)(2) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-5-7 (2012), GA Code Ann, § 9-11-30 (2012), Carruth v. Brown, 202
Ga. App. 656, 658 (1992), Huff v. Anderson, 212 Ga. 32, 34 (1955), Pitmon v. State, 265 Ga. App. 655, 659
(2004), Giles v. Jones, 169 Ga. App. 882 (1984), GA Constitution Case Co. v. Parker, 161 Ga. App. 614,
617 (1982), Myers v. Barnard, 180 Ga. App. 192, 193 (1986), GA Code Ann § 24-2-2 (2012), Hendrix v.
Byers Bldg. Supply, Inc.,167 Ga. App. 878, 880 (1983), Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire v. Campbell
Nissan N. Am., 258 Ga. App. 767, 768 (2002), Bowen, 246 Ga. App. at 180, Chapman, 220 Ga. App. at 542 ,
GA Code Ann § 24-4-22 Radford v. State, 251 Ga. 50, 53 (1983), Jones v. Krystal Co., 231 Ga. App. 102,
107 (1998), Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery, P.C. v. Nestlehutt 286 Ga. 731, 735-36 (2010), GA Constitution
art. I, § I, para. XI(a), Porter v. Bland, 105 Ga. App. 703, 709 (1962), Long v. Serritt, 102 Ga. App. 550,
554 -55 (1960), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(b) (2012), Suarez v. Halbert,
246 Ga. App. 822, 824 (2000), O.C.G.A. 40-5-54.1 (2010), Georgia Code § 35-3-37, Georgia Code § 24-4-65,
Georgia Code § 15-11-83.… which are direct violations of Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. § 16-10-1: “[A]ny
public officer who willfully and intentionally violates the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall, upon
conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years” and
O.C.G.A. § 15-6-6: “[B]efore entering on the duties of their office, superior court judges must take the oath
required of all civil officers and in addition they must take the following oath: “I swear that I will administer
justice without respect to person and do equal rights to the poor and the rich and that I will faithfully and
impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent on me as judge of the superior courts of this
state, according to the best of my ability and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and Constitution of
this state ability and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state and the
Constitution of the United States. So help me God.” Therefore all of the above listed Officers of the Court
should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of State and Federal laws for the above as well as the below listed
Constitutional Violations.
Page 57 of 89

On July 3, 2013 during the Motion for Contempt hearing against Attorney Willis for violating my
right to see and speak with Spencer, I presented and entered into evidence Georgia Supreme Court case Law
Willis v Willis S10F1357, Georgia Supreme Court case law S11F0835 Sigal v. Sigal and Superior Court Order
S10F1358, Willis v Willis, 2009 CV165814 Final Judgment and Decree of Divorce (1/6/10), which stipulates my
right to request hair follicle drug testing from Attorney Willis, informed Judge Goger that he did not Order that
drug testing was no-longer required, also notified Judge Goger that I requested drug testing from Attorney Willis
as upheld by the Georgia Supreme Court and that Attorney Willis was not in compliance. Once the evidence
(including Exhibits) were presented, Judge Goger informed me that he was not going to find Attorney Willis in
Contempt for refusing to be submit to drug testing (as upheld) by the Georgia Supreme Court and based on the
July 3, 2013 attached Order (EXHIBIT EZ) and Judge Goger chose not to even mention that there was a
violation of the Order in his June 3, 2013 Order (EXHIBIT EZ). Judge Goger’s use of “Discernment” to
completely ignore legal precedence in the Georgia Supreme Court not only violates my Constitutional Right to a
Fair Trial but it also completely ignores the Best Interest of the Minor Child, Spencer Carl Willis. . For this
reason and the below listed reasons, all of Judge Goger’s Orders should be set aside in accordance with 28
U.S.C. § 1655, “Rule 60. Relief From A Judgment Or Order (b) Grounds for Relief from a Final
Judgment, Order, or Proceeding); wherein the court may relieve a party or its legal representative
from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence,
surprise, or excusable neglect; (3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic),
misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party; (6) any other reason that justifies
relief.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2), “which describes Obstruction of Justice”,
wherein “if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or
defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny
to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully
Page 58 of 89
enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal
protection of the laws.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3), wherein “if one or more persons engaged therein
do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another
is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of
a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the
recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the
conspirators”, Civil Rights Act of 1871, Civil Rights Act of 1961, Fifth Amendment Right, Mapp v.
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), Fourteenth Amendments Due Process Clause, Mugler V. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623
at 661, Sixth Amendment”.), Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), which was
enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted
October 15, 1970), Fernandez v. United States, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63796, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. July 24,
2009), Livingston v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 759 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1985), United States v. Bohr, 406
F. Supp 1218 (E.D. Wis. 1976), United States v. Doe, 935 F. Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y. 1996), Sealed Appellant v.
Sealed Appellee, 130 F.3d 695, 697 (5th Cir.1997), Dean v. United States, 418 F. Supp. 149(E.D.N.Y. 2006);
Doe v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021(S.D.N.Y. June 29, 2004), Doe,
2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021 at *46 S.REGION BLACK L. STUDENTS ASS’NL.J. 31, 32-33 (2012), Burt
W. Griffin & Lewis R. Katz OH. FELONY SENT.L. § 5:53 (2008), Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S.
361, 365 (1989), United States v. Lucido, 612 F.3d 871, 872-73 (6th Cir. 2010), 18 U.S.C. § 1503, United
States v. McLeod, 385 F.2d 734, 747-50 (5thCir. 1967), Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. 41-3-12 (2010), GA
CODE ANN. § 9-11-4 (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(c) (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(e)(7) (2012),
GA Code Ann § 9-11-5(f) (2012), GA CODE ANN .§ 9-3-51(a) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-22 (2012), GA
Code Ann § 9-3-31 (2012), O'Callaghan v. Bank of Eastman, 180 Ga. 812, 818 (1935), GA Code Ann 9-3-1
and 9-3-2 (2012), GA Code Ann § 44-5-163 (2012), GA Code Ann GA Code Ann § 9-11-26(b)(4)(A)(i)
Page 59 of 89
(2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(b)(c)(2) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-5-7
(2012), GA Code Ann, § 9-11-30 (2012), Carruth v. Brown, 202 Ga. App. 656, 658 (1992), Huff v.
Anderson, 212 Ga. 32, 34 (1955), Pitmon v. State, 265 Ga. App. 655, 659 (2004), Giles v. Jones, 169 Ga.
App. 882 (1984), GA Constitution Case Co. v. Parker, 161 Ga. App. 614, 617 (1982), Myers v. Barnard,
180 Ga. App. 192, 193 (1986), GA Code Ann § 24-2-2 (2012), Hendrix v. Byers Bldg. Supply, Inc.,167 Ga.
App. 878, 880 (1983), Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire v. Campbell Nissan N. Am., 258 Ga. App. 767,
768 (2002), Bowen, 246 Ga. App. at 180, Chapman, 220 Ga. App. at 542 , GA Code Ann § 24-4-22 Radford
v. State, 251 Ga. 50, 53 (1983), Jones v. Krystal Co., 231 Ga. App. 102, 107 (1998), Atlanta Oculoplastic
Surgery, P.C. v. Nestlehutt 286 Ga. 731, 735-36 (2010), GA Constitution art. I, § I, para. XI(a), Porter v.
Bland, 105 Ga. App. 703, 709 (1962), Long v. Serritt, 102 Ga. App. 550, 554 -55 (1960), GA Code Ann § 5112-5.1(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(b) (2012), Suarez v. Halbert, 246 Ga. App. 822, 824 (2000),
O.C.G.A. 40-5-54.1 (2010), Georgia Code § 35-3-37, Georgia Code § 24-4-65, Georgia Code § 15-11-83.…
which are direct violations of Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. § 16-10-1: “[A]ny public officer who willfully and
intentionally violates the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished
by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years” and O.C.G.A. § 15-6-6: “[B]efore entering
on the duties of their office, superior court judges must take the oath required of all civil officers and in addition
they must take the following oath: “I swear that I will administer justice without respect to person and do
equal rights to the poor and the rich and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all
the duties incumbent on me as judge of the superior courts of this state, according to the best of my ability
and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state ability and understanding, and
agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state and the Constitution of the United States. So help me
God.” Therefore all of the above listed Officers of the Court should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of State
and Federal laws for the above as well as the below listed Constitutional Violations.
Page 60 of 89

On July 3, 2013 during the Motion for Contempt hearing against Attorney Willis for violating my right to
see and speak with Spencer, I also presented and entered into evidence further testimony regarding Georgia
Supreme Court case law S11F0835, which stipulated the need and parameters for requiring Supervised visitation
(Proven drug use) and noted that I had no proven drug use… whereas Attorney Willis has a proven record of
drug use as acknowledged by the Georgia Supreme Court. Then I also mentioned to Judge Goger that the
Georgia Supreme Courts decided to release the Drug User Litigant required to adhere to Supervised Visitation in
S11F0835 within three months of the Final Order. Then I requested the release of the Supervised Visitation
requirement in my case due to the fact that the Final Order in my case was entered over three months ago and I
had no history of drug use. Then I read into evidence all of the Federal Laws that prohibit Judge Goger from
violating my Constitutional Right to refuse to be psychologically evaluated (Judge Goger’s rationale for
requiring Supervised Visitation) and the Federal Law that prohibits any form of retaliation for Exercising my
Constitutional Right to refuse to be Psychologically Evaluated, which is Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 2d 946 (1973).
Then Judge Goger stated “Please do not read those cases” and then promptly used his “Discernment” to denying
my Request for unsupervised Visitation because I refused to be Psychologically Evaluated. Judge Goger’s use of
“Discernment” to completely ignores legal precedence established not only by the Georgia Supreme Court but by
the United States Supreme Court and his non judicious use of “Discernment” violates my Constitutional Right to
a Fair Trial AND completely ignores the Best Interest of the Minor Child, Spencer Carl Willis.
a. It should also be noted that Judge Goger’s un judicious use of “Discernment” has had an negative impact of
the personal, social, religious, educational matriculation of the minor Child, Spencer Carl Willis has
expressed that he fears that he will never see his Mother again, fears that I have abandoned him and actually
was relieved to find out that I was in jail during the timeframe that I was falsely incarcerated (June 14, 2013
through June 24, 2013) because it provided an explanation as to why he had not received his daily call from
me (which has been decreased from anytime to week days (only) between the hours of 6:00 PM and 8:00 PM
with calls lasting no more than 15 minutes as prescribed by Judge Goger, when Attorney Willis (Father)
Page 61 of 89
allows Spencer to speak with me). Attorney Willis (Father) has for months now chosen to Hide Spencer on
my limited visitation days, which led to the many-many calls to the Fulton County Police from Attorney
Willis Home in order to even obtain custody (on the occasions that Attorney Willis (Father) answered the
door). On one of the occasions that I had no other choice but to contact the Police, Attorney Willis (Father)
informed the three Officers that responded to the call that the reason he did not grant custody was because his
Attorney (Attorney Sanders) informed him not to followed by many other off colored responses including
that I was mentally insane, that I would take Spencer out of State for four (4) weeks (Which again is
stipulated as a right to summer visitation per Judge Goger’s Final Order) and even that I would not return
Spencer to his custody at 9:00 AM on Monday as requested (although it was Saturday afternoon and I had
already missed half of my designated visitation). Although Judge Gpger’s Order specifically stipulates that I
have the right to four (4) weeks of summer visitation, I notified the police that I certainly would be returning
Spencer to Attorney Willis’ custody at 9:00 AM on Monday and would be going to the Courthouse to request
my right to four (4) weeks of visitation from a Presiding Judge due to Judge Goger’s proven use of un
judicious “Discernment” and the fact that in all of these years of filing Contempt Motions against Attorney
Willis for being in violation of our Final Order, NO JUDGE (and we have had three thus far to include Judge
Goger, Republican Judge Tom Campbell and Chief Judge Cynthia Wright) has EVER found Attorney Willis
in violation of any of their Orders or in Contempt for violating any of their Orders). Finally, I was provided
with no other option but to Subpoena (via the Depositions that continue to be Quashed by Judge John Goger)
all of the Police Officers to testify that Attorney Willis (Father) is again in violation of the Final Order.
However, Judge Goger continue to Quash the Subpoenas in an effort to suppress the evidence and has even
Ordered me stay 500 feet or 500 yards away from Attorney Willis’ (Father) home or face being arrested and
incarcerated for Contempt (again) to prevent me from documenting when Attorney Willis (Father) is in
violation of the Order – yes, but this non judicious Order also prevents me from having the ability to secure
custody when Attorney Willis intentionally chooses not to provide custody as Ordered.
Page 62 of 89

Additionally, Judge Goger’s un judicious use of “Discernment” has led to Spencer being switched
to three (3) different schools in only a year and a half; instability in the home because Attorney Willis (Father)
Ms. Sonya, Spencer’s Track coach (although Spencer is the only child on the track team) is caring for Spencer at
night (she has spent the night “more than 100 times” per Spencer) and on the weekends without the requirement
of a background check, drug testing or a psychologically evaluation as required of me (Spencer’s Biological
Mother) and Ms. Sonya is simply Attorney Willis’ live in girlfriend. Clearly Judge Goger’s use of
“Discernment” is not only un judicious but callous, intentional, malicious and detrimental to the well being and
the Best Interest of the minor child, Spencer Carl Willis. . For this reason and the below listed reasons, all of
Judge Goger’s Orders should be set aside in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1655, “Rule 60. Relief From A
Judgment Or Order (b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding);
wherein the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or
proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect;
(3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by
an opposing party; (6) any other reason that justifies relief.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985
(2), “which describes Obstruction of Justice”, wherein “if two or more persons conspire for the
purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of
justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the
laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of
any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3),
wherein “if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance
of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or
deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the
Page 63 of 89
party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such
injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators”, Civil Rights Act of 1871, Civil
Rights Act of 1961, Fifth Amendment Right, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), Fourteenth Amendments
Due Process Clause, Mugler V. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623 at 661, Sixth Amendment”.), Racketeer Influenced
and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), which was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime
Control Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted October 15, 1970), Fernandez v. United States,
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63796, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. July 24, 2009), Livingston v. United States Dep’t of Justice,
759 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1985), United States v. Bohr, 406 F. Supp 1218 (E.D. Wis. 1976), United States v.
Doe, 935 F. Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y. 1996), Sealed Appellant v. Sealed Appellee, 130 F.3d 695, 697 (5th
Cir.1997), Dean v. United States, 418 F. Supp. 149(E.D.N.Y. 2006); Doe v. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021(S.D.N.Y. June 29, 2004), Doe, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021 at *46
S.REGION BLACK L. STUDENTS ASS’NL.J. 31, 32-33 (2012), Burt W. Griffin & Lewis R. Katz OH.
FELONY SENT.L. § 5:53 (2008), Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361, 365 (1989), United States v.
Lucido, 612 F.3d 871, 872-73 (6th Cir. 2010), 18 U.S.C. § 1503, United States v. McLeod, 385 F.2d 734,
747-50 (5thCir. 1967), Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. 41-3-12 (2010), GA CODE ANN. § 9-11-4 (2012), GA
CODE ANN § 9-11-4(c) (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(e)(7) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-5(f) (2012),
GA CODE ANN .§ 9-3-51(a) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-22 (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-31 (2012),
O'Callaghan v. Bank of Eastman, 180 Ga. 812, 818 (1935), GA Code Ann 9-3-1 and 9-3-2 (2012), GA Code
Ann § 44-5-163 (2012), GA Code Ann GA Code Ann § 9-11-26(b)(4)(A)(i) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-1134(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(b)(c)(2) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-5-7 (2012), GA Code Ann, § 9-1130 (2012), Carruth v. Brown, 202 Ga. App. 656, 658 (1992), Huff v. Anderson, 212 Ga. 32, 34 (1955),
Pitmon v. State, 265 Ga. App. 655, 659 (2004), Giles v. Jones, 169 Ga. App. 882 (1984), GA Constitution
Case Co. v. Parker, 161 Ga. App. 614, 617 (1982), Myers v. Barnard, 180 Ga. App. 192, 193 (1986), GA
Code Ann § 24-2-2 (2012), Hendrix v. Byers Bldg. Supply, Inc.,167 Ga. App. 878, 880 (1983),
Page 64 of 89
Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire v. Campbell Nissan N. Am., 258 Ga. App. 767, 768 (2002), Bowen, 246
Ga. App. at 180, Chapman, 220 Ga. App. at 542 , GA Code Ann § 24-4-22 Radford v. State, 251 Ga. 50, 53
(1983), Jones v. Krystal Co., 231 Ga. App. 102, 107 (1998), Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery, P.C. v.
Nestlehutt 286 Ga. 731, 735-36 (2010), GA Constitution art. I, § I, para. XI(a), Porter v. Bland, 105 Ga.
App. 703, 709 (1962), Long v. Serritt, 102 Ga. App. 550, 554 -55 (1960), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(c)
(2012), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(b) (2012), Suarez v. Halbert, 246 Ga. App. 822, 824 (2000), O.C.G.A. 405-54.1 (2010), Georgia Code § 35-3-37, Georgia Code § 24-4-65, Georgia Code § 15-11-83.… which are
direct violations of Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. § 16-10-1: “[A]ny public officer who willfully and
intentionally violates the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished
by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years” and O.C.G.A. § 15-6-6: “[B]efore entering
on the duties of their office, superior court judges must take the oath required of all civil officers and in addition
they must take the following oath: “I swear that I will administer justice without respect to person and do
equal rights to the poor and the rich and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all
the duties incumbent on me as judge of the superior courts of this state, according to the best of my ability
and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state ability and understanding, and
agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state and the Constitution of the United States. So help me
God.” Therefore all of the above listed Officers of the Court should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of State
and Federal laws for the above as well as the below listed Constitutional Violations.

On July 3, 2013 during the Motion for Contempt hearing against Attorney Willis for violating my right to see
and speak with Spencer, Judge Goger heard and looked at all of the case law evidence and then dismissed all
of the Motions Subpoenaed Depositions via the July 3, 2013 Order and Dismissed the Third Trial under case
number 2013CV231662 verbally (but not in the July 3, 2013 written Order) to include the second 30-Day
Status Conference Hearing on August 6, 2013. As Judge Goger verbally dismissed the Third Trial under case
number 2013CV231662, I attempted to file a fourth (4th) case with the Clerk of the Court. However, when I
Page 65 of 89
went to file the required documents for a Petition for Change of Custody, Motions and Subpoenas, I was
informed by the Clerk of the Court that they would no –longer accept Filings (Motions, Petitions and
Subpoenas) without a Request to File or Permission (EXHIBIT FA) from Judge Goger file Motions,
Petitions and Subpoenas or in other words permission to proceed in a Trial normally… which of course
violated my sixth (6th) amendment Constitutional Right to a Fair Trial. So instead of filing all of my
proceedings, I filed the attached hand written Motion Request to File a Request to File (EXHIBIT FA) a…
a. Motion for Contempt and Petition for Change od Custody
b. Domestic Relations Affidavit
c. Parenting Plan
d. Motion for Assigned Judge To Hear all Case Matters
e. Motion for Expedited Trial
f. Motion for Summary Judgment
g. Deposition Subpoenas and Witness Subpoenas for Attorney / Guardian Ad Litem
Karlise Grier, Ashley Sparks (Teacher), Vivian Rivera (Teacher), Officer D.
Williamson (339), Officer D. Williams (341), Officer E. Benefield (209), Officer
G. Hightower (225), Officer J. Wyches (239), Investigator C.A. Flournory (980),
Officer M. Voight, Sheriff B. Crawford, Woodward Academy (Spencer’s Latest
School) and Carl J. Willis, II.

Then as required by Judge Goger, I delivered the filed and date stamped (Attached) Motion to file
along with the Exhibits to Judge Goger (U.S. Postal Service Certified Tracking Number 7011-3500-0002-42498277). The Georgia Clerk of the Courts decision to no longer accept any filings related to Motions, Petitions and
Subpoenas from me in accordance with Judge Goger’s Order violates the Clerk of the Courts Duty to accept
filings without determination of relevance or merit as it is the duty of a Judge or a Jury to make such
Page 66 of 89
determination through Trial as provided by the Constitution of the United States of America. Additionally, a
Motion to request Trial proceedings that would enable Judge Goger and the Clerk of the Courts to unilaterally
prevent me from proceeding through the normal course of a Trial was not properly served by the Sheriff, I did
not receive thirty (30) days from the date of service to respond to the Motion and I did not receive a Rule Nisi on
a Court hearing that would establish the grounds for an Order from Judge Goger. . For this reason and the below
listed reasons, all of Judge Goger’s Orders should be set aside in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1655, “Rule
60. Relief From A Judgment Or Order (b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or
Proceeding); wherein the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final
judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or
excusable neglect; (3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation,
or misconduct by an opposing party; (6) any other reason that justifies relief.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1983,
42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2), “which describes Obstruction of Justice”, wherein “if two or more persons
conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the
due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal
protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to
enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws.”, 42
U.S.C. § 1985 (3), wherein “if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any
act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or
property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United
States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages
occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators”, Civil
Rights Act of 1871, Civil Rights Act of 1961, Fifth Amendment Right, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961),
Page 67 of 89
Fourteenth Amendments Due Process Clause, Mugler V. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623 at 661, Sixth
Amendment”.), Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), which was enacted by
section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted
October 15, 1970), Fernandez v. United States, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63796, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. July 24,
2009), Livingston v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 759 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1985), United States v. Bohr, 406
F. Supp 1218 (E.D. Wis. 1976), United States v. Doe, 935 F. Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y. 1996), Sealed Appellant v.
Sealed Appellee, 130 F.3d 695, 697 (5th Cir.1997), Dean v. United States, 418 F. Supp. 149(E.D.N.Y. 2006);
Doe v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021(S.D.N.Y. June 29, 2004), Doe,
2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021 at *46 S.REGION BLACK L. STUDENTS ASS’NL.J. 31, 32-33 (2012), Burt
W. Griffin & Lewis R. Katz OH. FELONY SENT.L. § 5:53 (2008), Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S.
361, 365 (1989), United States v. Lucido, 612 F.3d 871, 872-73 (6th Cir. 2010), 18 U.S.C. § 1503, United
States v. McLeod, 385 F.2d 734, 747-50 (5thCir. 1967), Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. 41-3-12 (2010), GA
CODE ANN. § 9-11-4 (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(c) (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(e)(7) (2012),
GA Code Ann § 9-11-5(f) (2012), GA CODE ANN .§ 9-3-51(a) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-22 (2012), GA
Code Ann § 9-3-31 (2012), O'Callaghan v. Bank of Eastman, 180 Ga. 812, 818 (1935), GA Code Ann 9-3-1
and 9-3-2 (2012), GA Code Ann § 44-5-163 (2012), GA Code Ann GA Code Ann § 9-11-26(b)(4)(A)(i)
(2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(b)(c)(2) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-5-7
(2012), GA Code Ann, § 9-11-30 (2012), Carruth v. Brown, 202 Ga. App. 656, 658 (1992), Huff v.
Anderson, 212 Ga. 32, 34 (1955), Pitmon v. State, 265 Ga. App. 655, 659 (2004), Giles v. Jones, 169 Ga.
App. 882 (1984), GA Constitution Case Co. v. Parker, 161 Ga. App. 614, 617 (1982), Myers v. Barnard,
180 Ga. App. 192, 193 (1986), GA Code Ann § 24-2-2 (2012), Hendrix v. Byers Bldg. Supply, Inc.,167 Ga.
App. 878, 880 (1983), Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire v. Campbell Nissan N. Am., 258 Ga. App. 767,
768 (2002), Bowen, 246 Ga. App. at 180, Chapman, 220 Ga. App. at 542 , GA Code Ann § 24-4-22 Radford
v. State, 251 Ga. 50, 53 (1983), Jones v. Krystal Co., 231 Ga. App. 102, 107 (1998), Atlanta Oculoplastic
Page 68 of 89
Surgery, P.C. v. Nestlehutt 286 Ga. 731, 735-36 (2010), GA Constitution art. I, § I, para. XI(a), Porter v.
Bland, 105 Ga. App. 703, 709 (1962), Long v. Serritt, 102 Ga. App. 550, 554 -55 (1960), GA Code Ann § 5112-5.1(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(b) (2012), Suarez v. Halbert, 246 Ga. App. 822, 824 (2000),
O.C.G.A. 40-5-54.1 (2010), Georgia Code § 35-3-37, Georgia Code § 24-4-65, Georgia Code § 15-11-83.…
which are direct violations of Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. § 16-10-1: “[A]ny public officer who willfully and
intentionally violates the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished
by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years” and O.C.G.A. § 15-6-6: “[B]efore entering
on the duties of their office, superior court judges must take the oath required of all civil officers and in addition
they must take the following oath: “I swear that I will administer justice without respect to person and do
equal rights to the poor and the rich and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all
the duties incumbent on me as judge of the superior courts of this state, according to the best of my ability
and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state ability and understanding, and
agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state and the Constitution of the United States. So help me
God.” Therefore all of the above listed Officers of the Court should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of State
and Federal laws for the above as well as the below listed Constitutional Violations.


On June 28, 2013, I received a copy of yet another non judicial Order styled Order on June 7, 2013
Hearing that was filed on June 12, 2013, the same day that the Order on Behavior of Respondent
and Subpoenas was filed and emailed by Attorney Sears. However, given that Attorney Sears never mailed or
emailed the Ordered (as stipulated in writing by Judge Goger in his June 14, 2013 Contempt Arrest Order
(EXHIBIT DR)) and Attorney Sanders did not respond to a request for a copy of the June 7, 2013 Order today, I
am incorporating the attached Order (EXHIBIT DV) as timely filed as of June 28, 2013, the day that I received
it via email from Attorney Willis. The attached Order on June 7, 2013 Hearing (EXHIBIT DV) strips away
ALL of my parental rights, which essentially terminates ALL of my parental rights because I refuse to be
Psychologically Evaluated as well as strips me of the right to call the Police to request my right to visitation
Page 69 of 89
when Attorney Willis refuses to grant custody and is violation of Judge Goger’s Order as I can no longer go to
Attorney Willis Home to pick up Spencer. . For this reason and the below listed reasons, all of Judge Goger’s
Orders should be set aside in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1655, “Rule 60. Relief From A Judgment Or
Order (b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding); wherein the court
may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the
following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (3) fraud (whether
previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party;
(6) any other reason that justifies relief.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2), “which
describes Obstruction of Justice”, wherein “if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of
impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any
State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure
him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or
class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3), wherein “if one or
more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of
such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and
exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived
may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation,
against any one or more of the conspirators”, Civil Rights Act of 1871, Civil Rights Act of 1961, Fifth
Amendment Right, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), Fourteenth Amendments Due Process Clause,
Mugler V. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623 at 661, Sixth Amendment”.), Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act (RICO), which was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of
1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted October 15, 1970), Fernandez v. United States, 2009 U.S. Dist.
Page 70 of 89
LEXIS 63796, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. July 24, 2009), Livingston v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 759 F.2d 74
(D.C. Cir. 1985), United States v. Bohr, 406 F. Supp 1218 (E.D. Wis. 1976), United States v. Doe, 935 F.
Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y. 1996), Sealed Appellant v. Sealed Appellee, 130 F.3d 695, 697 (5th Cir.1997), Dean v.
United States, 418 F. Supp. 149(E.D.N.Y. 2006); Doe v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 2004 U.S.
Dist. Lexis 12021(S.D.N.Y. June 29, 2004), Doe, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021 at *46 S.REGION BLACK L.
STUDENTS ASS’NL.J. 31, 32-33 (2012), Burt W. Griffin & Lewis R. Katz OH. FELONY SENT.L. § 5:53
(2008), Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361, 365 (1989), United States v. Lucido, 612 F.3d 871, 872-73
(6th Cir. 2010), 18 U.S.C. § 1503, United States v. McLeod, 385 F.2d 734, 747-50 (5thCir. 1967), Georgia
Statutes O.C.G.A. 41-3-12 (2010), GA CODE ANN. § 9-11-4 (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(c) (2012),
GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(e)(7) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-5(f) (2012), GA CODE ANN .§ 9-3-51(a)
(2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-22 (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-31 (2012), O'Callaghan v. Bank of Eastman,
180 Ga. 812, 818 (1935), GA Code Ann 9-3-1 and 9-3-2 (2012), GA Code Ann § 44-5-163 (2012), GA Code
Ann GA Code Ann § 9-11-26(b)(4)(A)(i) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-1134(b)(c)(2) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-5-7 (2012), GA Code Ann, § 9-11-30 (2012), Carruth v. Brown, 202
Ga. App. 656, 658 (1992), Huff v. Anderson, 212 Ga. 32, 34 (1955), Pitmon v. State, 265 Ga. App. 655, 659
(2004), Giles v. Jones, 169 Ga. App. 882 (1984), GA Constitution Case Co. v. Parker, 161 Ga. App. 614,
617 (1982), Myers v. Barnard, 180 Ga. App. 192, 193 (1986), GA Code Ann § 24-2-2 (2012), Hendrix v.
Byers Bldg. Supply, Inc.,167 Ga. App. 878, 880 (1983), Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire v. Campbell
Nissan N. Am., 258 Ga. App. 767, 768 (2002), Bowen, 246 Ga. App. at 180, Chapman, 220 Ga. App. at 542 ,
GA Code Ann § 24-4-22 Radford v. State, 251 Ga. 50, 53 (1983), Jones v. Krystal Co., 231 Ga. App. 102,
107 (1998), Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery, P.C. v. Nestlehutt 286 Ga. 731, 735-36 (2010), GA Constitution
art. I, § I, para. XI(a), Porter v. Bland, 105 Ga. App. 703, 709 (1962), Long v. Serritt, 102 Ga. App. 550,
554 -55 (1960), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(b) (2012), Suarez v. Halbert,
246 Ga. App. 822, 824 (2000), O.C.G.A. 40-5-54.1 (2010), Georgia Code § 35-3-37, Georgia Code § 24-4-65,
Page 71 of 89
Georgia Code § 15-11-83.… which are direct violations of Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. § 16-10-1: “[A]ny
public officer who willfully and intentionally violates the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall, upon
conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years” and
O.C.G.A. § 15-6-6: “[B]efore entering on the duties of their office, superior court judges must take the oath
required of all civil officers and in addition they must take the following oath: “I swear that I will administer
justice without respect to person and do equal rights to the poor and the rich and that I will faithfully and
impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent on me as judge of the superior courts of this
state, according to the best of my ability and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and Constitution of
this state ability and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state and the
Constitution of the United States. So help me God.” Therefore all of the above listed Officers of the Court
should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of State and Federal laws for the above as well as the below listed
Constitutional Violations.

Also filed but received (via email by Attorney Sears), the June 12, 2013 Order on Behavior of
Respondent and Subpoenas strips away ALL of my Constitutional Rights to a fair Trial and Appeal because... per
Judge Goger, I have to request permission to file ANYTHING related to witnesses or evidence and if I do not
request permission to file then Judge Goger will (per his proven record of falsely incarcerating (EXHIBIT DS)
me for Contempt this past week for requesting my four (4) weeks of visitation as Ordered in his March 14, 2013
Final Order (EXHIBIT BZ). As I have another Court Hearing on July 3, 2013, I would like to pre file any
additionally Contempt Arrest Orders as an Error, given that I filed the required Subpoenas and a Motion to
proceed with the third Trial as a Constitutional Right on June 26, 2013 and June 28, 2013. Finally, requiring
permission from a Judge to proceed with the normal Trial proceeding (Subpoenas, Depositions, Appeals,
Complaints, etc.) in my case violates my Constitutional Right to a Fair Trial and Appeal. . For this reason and
the below listed reasons, all of Judge Goger’s Orders should be set aside in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §
1655, “Rule 60. Relief From A Judgment Or Order (b) Grounds for Relief from a Final
Page 72 of 89
Judgment, Order, or Proceeding); wherein the court may relieve a party or its legal representative
from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence,
surprise, or excusable neglect; (3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic),
misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party; (6) any other reason that justifies
relief.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2), “which describes Obstruction of Justice”,
wherein “if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or
defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny
to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully
enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal
protection of the laws.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3), wherein “if one or more persons engaged therein
do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another
is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of
a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the
recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the
conspirators”, Civil Rights Act of 1871, Civil Rights Act of 1961, Fifth Amendment Right, Mapp v.
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), Fourteenth Amendments Due Process Clause, Mugler V. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623
at 661, Sixth Amendment”.), Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), which was
enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted
October 15, 1970), Fernandez v. United States, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63796, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. July 24,
2009), Livingston v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 759 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1985), United States v. Bohr, 406
F. Supp 1218 (E.D. Wis. 1976), United States v. Doe, 935 F. Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y. 1996), Sealed Appellant v.
Sealed Appellee, 130 F.3d 695, 697 (5th Cir.1997), Dean v. United States, 418 F. Supp. 149(E.D.N.Y. 2006);
Page 73 of 89
Doe v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021(S.D.N.Y. June 29, 2004), Doe,
2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021 at *46 S.REGION BLACK L. STUDENTS ASS’NL.J. 31, 32-33 (2012), Burt
W. Griffin & Lewis R. Katz OH. FELONY SENT.L. § 5:53 (2008), Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S.
361, 365 (1989), United States v. Lucido, 612 F.3d 871, 872-73 (6th Cir. 2010), 18 U.S.C. § 1503, United
States v. McLeod, 385 F.2d 734, 747-50 (5thCir. 1967), Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. 41-3-12 (2010), GA
CODE ANN. § 9-11-4 (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(c) (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(e)(7) (2012),
GA Code Ann § 9-11-5(f) (2012), GA CODE ANN .§ 9-3-51(a) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-22 (2012), GA
Code Ann § 9-3-31 (2012), O'Callaghan v. Bank of Eastman, 180 Ga. 812, 818 (1935), GA Code Ann 9-3-1
and 9-3-2 (2012), GA Code Ann § 44-5-163 (2012), GA Code Ann GA Code Ann § 9-11-26(b)(4)(A)(i)
(2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(b)(c)(2) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-5-7
(2012), GA Code Ann, § 9-11-30 (2012), Carruth v. Brown, 202 Ga. App. 656, 658 (1992), Huff v.
Anderson, 212 Ga. 32, 34 (1955), Pitmon v. State, 265 Ga. App. 655, 659 (2004), Giles v. Jones, 169 Ga.
App. 882 (1984), GA Constitution Case Co. v. Parker, 161 Ga. App. 614, 617 (1982), Myers v. Barnard,
180 Ga. App. 192, 193 (1986), GA Code Ann § 24-2-2 (2012), Hendrix v. Byers Bldg. Supply, Inc.,167 Ga.
App. 878, 880 (1983), Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire v. Campbell Nissan N. Am., 258 Ga. App. 767,
768 (2002), Bowen, 246 Ga. App. at 180, Chapman, 220 Ga. App. at 542 , GA Code Ann § 24-4-22 Radford
v. State, 251 Ga. 50, 53 (1983), Jones v. Krystal Co., 231 Ga. App. 102, 107 (1998), Atlanta Oculoplastic
Surgery, P.C. v. Nestlehutt 286 Ga. 731, 735-36 (2010), GA Constitution art. I, § I, para. XI(a), Porter v.
Bland, 105 Ga. App. 703, 709 (1962), Long v. Serritt, 102 Ga. App. 550, 554 -55 (1960), GA Code Ann § 5112-5.1(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(b) (2012), Suarez v. Halbert, 246 Ga. App. 822, 824 (2000),
O.C.G.A. 40-5-54.1 (2010), Georgia Code § 35-3-37, Georgia Code § 24-4-65, Georgia Code § 15-11-83.…
which are direct violations of Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. § 16-10-1: “[A]ny public officer who willfully and
intentionally violates the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished
by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years” and O.C.G.A. § 15-6-6: “[B]efore entering
Page 74 of 89
on the duties of their office, superior court judges must take the oath required of all civil officers and in addition
they must take the following oath: “I swear that I will administer justice without respect to person and do
equal rights to the poor and the rich and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all
the duties incumbent on me as judge of the superior courts of this state, according to the best of my ability
and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state ability and understanding, and
agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state and the Constitution of the United States. So help me
God.” Therefore all of the above listed Officers of the Court should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of State
and Federal laws for the above as well as the below listed Constitutional Violations.

On June 26, 2013, I received an email from Attorney Willis at 9:05 AM (Our Court hearing was
scheduled for 9:30 AM) informing me that he would not be attending the days hearing. I responded by
informing all parties that I would be in attendance as we also had scheduled Depositions for all of the witnesses
for preservation of their testimony. As Judge Goger coincidentally had a murder Trial that he deemed a priority
of Depositions that would disprove the lies in all of his Orders, I signed in and was eventually direct to
Magistrate Judge Jane Cook Barwick at 10:48 AM. I then informed Judge Cook Barwick that there was a
Motion for Assigned Judge to hear all case matters and requested that the Presiding Judge Hear all concerns. I
also moved for a Summary Judgment based on Attorney Willis and Attorney Sanders (Attorney for Attorney
Willis) failure to appear. Judge Cook Barwick stated that she could not rule on the case because it was brand new
and it was not "ripe" for judgment. I then briefly stated the considerations of the case and requested a ruling/
hearing date on the date that the case was "ripe for judgment" as well as requested a consequence for Attorney
Willis and Attorney Sanders failure to appear. Judge Cook Barwick then issued a second 30 Day Status Notice
(there is a 30, 60 and 90 day option) for August 6, 2013 at 10:30 AM... Months after my initial filing and today’s
court date.... Which is a prime example of how the Judges needlessly, intentionally and maliciously prolonged
the first two Trials for years prior to my actual trial date and then issued fraudulent Orders based on false
evidence. Then I was directed outside of the back room area to push the Judges chambers button to request that
Page 75 of 89
the Presiding Judge hear all other open case issues from Judge Goger. After several follow-up attempts for
direction, at 12:11 PM, I was directed by Judicial Assistant Carla Broyes to file a Motion to Request that I be
allowed to see this weeks Presiding Judge for Judge Goger to provide a ruling. I headed downstairs to the Clerk
of the Court to file the "Unusual" hand written request to see this weeks Presiding Judge that I have never
previously had to file (EXHIBIT DT), which is also an example of the exact same Motion that I filed while I
was in Jail on June 17, 2013 and June 21, 2013. Both Motions were denied while I was in jail and as I could not
ascertain the names of the Judges from behind bars from the Sheriffs Deputies, all of the Fulton County Judges,
Staff Attorney’s, Judicial Assistants and Court Reporters have been included in this Amended Complaint. In the
event that the Presiding Judges that denied my Motions while incarcerated decide to step forward, then the
Judges who did not violate my Constitutional Rights can be removed from the Complaint. At 2:15 PM, I
completed filed and date stamped with the Clerk of the Court the hand written "Motion Request to have Judge S.
Tusan, this weeks Presiding Judge Rule on the Open issues contained in this Motion" and handed the Motion to
Judicial Assistant Carla Broyles. Without even reading the Motion, Judicial Assistant Carla Broyles referenced
the fraudulent June 12, 2013 Order on Behavior of Respondent and Subpoena (EXHIBIT DU) as grounds for
not allowing me to have Judge Gail S. Tusan rule on the Motion. I stated that in addition to her reference, there
were other issues in the Motion that required a ruling and requested a written Order denying all of the issues in
the Motion. Judicial Assistant Carl Broyles then left and returned to returned to Judge Goger's chambers. At
3:18 PM, I heard back from Judicial Assistant Carla Broyles who stated that Attorney Sears stepped out
momentarily to notify me that neither he nor Judge Goger would provide a written denial to see Judge Gail S.
Tusan on the open issues. She further stated that Judge Goger would not allow Judge Gail S. Tusan to rule on
the case because the fraudulent June 12, 2013 Order (EXHIBIT DU) provides a list of requirements (Permission
to file Motion, Subpoena, Etc. and with NO MENTION OF THE JUNE 12, 2013 Order on June 7, 2013 Hearing
that was emailed by Attorney Willis today (June 28, 2013) which strips ALL of my parental Rights away…
which hear again proves that I NEVER received the Order on June 7, 2013 Hearing because they could have just
Page 76 of 89
as easily have used the July 7, 2013 Order (that they did not reference) as grounds for refusing to allow Presiding
Judge Gail Tusan to provide a ruling on the Open issues (EXHIBIT DV). Then I reminded Judicial Assistant
Carla Broyes that she was the one that instructed me to file the Motion (which constitutes permission). Then I
apologized to all of the witnessed for having to stay at the Courthouse all day only to find that Judge Goger was
refusing to take down their Depositions. Then on June 28, 2013, I exercised my Constitutional Right to a Fair
Trial by re-issuing (at Georgia Tax payer Expense) all of the Subpoenas and Sheriffs Entry of Service in an effort
to preserve the evidence. They are attached as EXHIBITS DW to EX. Judge Gogers and the Officers of the
Courts intentional stall tactics, delays, evidence tampering and witness intimidation tactics violates my
Constitutional Right to a Fair Trial. . For this reason and the below listed reasons, all of Judge Goger’s Orders
should be set aside in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1655, “Rule 60. Relief From A Judgment Or Order
(b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding); wherein the court may
relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the
following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (3) fraud (whether
previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party;
(6) any other reason that justifies relief.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2), “which
describes Obstruction of Justice”, wherein “if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of
impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any
State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure
him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or
class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3), wherein “if one or
more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of
such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and
Page 77 of 89
exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived
may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation,
against any one or more of the conspirators”, Civil Rights Act of 1871, Civil Rights Act of 1961, Fifth
Amendment Right, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), Fourteenth Amendments Due Process Clause,
Mugler V. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623 at 661, Sixth Amendment”.), Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act (RICO), which was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of
1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted October 15, 1970), Fernandez v. United States, 2009 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 63796, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. July 24, 2009), Livingston v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 759 F.2d 74
(D.C. Cir. 1985), United States v. Bohr, 406 F. Supp 1218 (E.D. Wis. 1976), United States v. Doe, 935 F.
Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y. 1996), Sealed Appellant v. Sealed Appellee, 130 F.3d 695, 697 (5th Cir.1997), Dean v.
United States, 418 F. Supp. 149(E.D.N.Y. 2006); Doe v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 2004 U.S.
Dist. Lexis 12021(S.D.N.Y. June 29, 2004), Doe, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021 at *46 S.REGION BLACK L.
STUDENTS ASS’NL.J. 31, 32-33 (2012), Burt W. Griffin & Lewis R. Katz OH. FELONY SENT.L. § 5:53
(2008), Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361, 365 (1989), United States v. Lucido, 612 F.3d 871, 872-73
(6th Cir. 2010), 18 U.S.C. § 1503, United States v. McLeod, 385 F.2d 734, 747-50 (5thCir. 1967), Georgia
Statutes O.C.G.A. 41-3-12 (2010), GA CODE ANN. § 9-11-4 (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(c) (2012),
GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(e)(7) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-5(f) (2012), GA CODE ANN .§ 9-3-51(a)
(2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-22 (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-31 (2012), O'Callaghan v. Bank of Eastman,
180 Ga. 812, 818 (1935), GA Code Ann 9-3-1 and 9-3-2 (2012), GA Code Ann § 44-5-163 (2012), GA Code
Ann GA Code Ann § 9-11-26(b)(4)(A)(i) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-1134(b)(c)(2) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-5-7 (2012), GA Code Ann, § 9-11-30 (2012), Carruth v. Brown, 202
Ga. App. 656, 658 (1992), Huff v. Anderson, 212 Ga. 32, 34 (1955), Pitmon v. State, 265 Ga. App. 655, 659
(2004), Giles v. Jones, 169 Ga. App. 882 (1984), GA Constitution Case Co. v. Parker, 161 Ga. App. 614,
617 (1982), Myers v. Barnard, 180 Ga. App. 192, 193 (1986), GA Code Ann § 24-2-2 (2012), Hendrix v.
Page 78 of 89
Byers Bldg. Supply, Inc.,167 Ga. App. 878, 880 (1983), Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire v. Campbell
Nissan N. Am., 258 Ga. App. 767, 768 (2002), Bowen, 246 Ga. App. at 180, Chapman, 220 Ga. App. at 542 ,
GA Code Ann § 24-4-22 Radford v. State, 251 Ga. 50, 53 (1983), Jones v. Krystal Co., 231 Ga. App. 102,
107 (1998), Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery, P.C. v. Nestlehutt 286 Ga. 731, 735-36 (2010), GA Constitution
art. I, § I, para. XI(a), Porter v. Bland, 105 Ga. App. 703, 709 (1962), Long v. Serritt, 102 Ga. App. 550,
554 -55 (1960), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(b) (2012), Suarez v. Halbert,
246 Ga. App. 822, 824 (2000), O.C.G.A. 40-5-54.1 (2010), Georgia Code § 35-3-37, Georgia Code § 24-4-65,
Georgia Code § 15-11-83.… which are direct violations of Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. § 16-10-1: “[A]ny
public officer who willfully and intentionally violates the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall, upon
conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years” and
O.C.G.A. § 15-6-6: “[B]efore entering on the duties of their office, superior court judges must take the oath
required of all civil officers and in addition they must take the following oath: “I swear that I will administer
justice without respect to person and do equal rights to the poor and the rich and that I will faithfully and
impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent on me as judge of the superior courts of this
state, according to the best of my ability and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and Constitution of
this state ability and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state and the
Constitution of the United States. So help me God.” Therefore all of the above listed Officers of the Court
should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of State and Federal laws for the above as well as the below listed
Constitutional Violations.

On June 14, 2013, I was falsely imprisoned and deprived of my liberty as well as due process
(14th Amendment) after I requested four (4) weeks of visitation from Judge Kimberly Esmond Adams, that
weeks Presiding Judge (The exact same request made of Judge Jerry W. Baxter, the Presiding Judge for weeks
July 1, 2013 through July 5, 2013; Judge Gail Tusan, the Presiding Judge for weeks June 24, 2013 through June
28, 2013; two un-named Presiding Judges for weeks June 17, 2013 through June 21, 2013 (while I was
Page 79 of 89
incarcerated); Judge Kimberly Esmond Adams for weeks June 10, 2013 through June 14, 2013; Judge Henry M.
Newkirk, the Presiding Judge for weeks June 3, 2013 throughJune 7, 2013 and Judge Christopher S. Brasher, the
Presiding Judge for weeks May 27, 2013 through May 31, 2013… which is a clear indication of extremely organized
corruption. Also a similar request for visitation made to Judge D. Todd Markle when Attorney Willis (Father)
refused to grant custody as required by the Final Order during this past 2012 Christmas season) Staff Attorney
Amira Arshad (Judge Kimberly Edmond Adams Staff Attorney) asked for proof that the case that I was
requesting a ruling on was not Pending before Judge Goger. I showed Amira Arshad Exhibit I of my packet,
which was Judge Goger's June 12, 2013 fraudulent (non judicious) Order on Behavior of Respondent and
Subpoenas (EXHIBIT DU) that again was issued without a filed Motion from Attorney Willis or his Attorney
(Attorney Sanders), Sheriffs Service, thirty days to respond to the Motion or a Trial hearing on the subject
matters that Judge Goger Ordered. In the "Order on Behavior of Respondent and Subpoenas", on Page 4,
Paragraph 2, Judge Goger writes... "Recently, she has gone to the chambers of each week's presiding judge and
demanded that he or she interpret this Court's March 14, 2013 Final Order."... Which is again an admission that
the case that I requested Judge Kimberly Esmond Adams to rule on was not pending. Then Staff Attorney (after
reviewing the documents) said that she was going to call Judge Goger, left and then returned to state that I
would need to see Judge Goger because the fraudulent document (although it includes as admission that the case
was not pending by Judge Goer) is an Admonishment. Then I headed to up to Judge Goger’s chambers for
further interpretation of what and what is not a pending case according to Judge Gogers own signed, filed and
date stamped Order (EXHIBIT DU). Finally, Attorney Sanders directed me to Judge Goger’s Courtroom and
without Due Process or the right to simply state that I would no longer see Judge Kimberly Esmond Adams to
request my right to four (4) weeks of visitation as Ordered in Judge Goger’s March 14, 2012 Order, I was
deprived of my liberty and sentenced to 10 (Days) in the Fulton County Jail without a Bond, First Appearance or
Option for Early Release as Judge Goger specified my date of release in the Contempt Arrest Order (EXHIBIT
DR). Judge Goger intentionally provided no bond and an exact release date to ensure that I served every day and
Page 80 of 89
would not be released early (as Prior to the Felony Arrest for Contempt for asking for four (4) weeks of
visitation with Spencer, I had never been arrested and the jail was over crowded.. which means that I probably
would have been released within hour given the charges, which means that I would have the opportunity to file a
Complaint on the fraudulent (non-judicious) June 12, 2013 Order on Behavior of Respondent and Subpoenas that
was timely filed with the assistance of other individuals on June 15, 2013 while I was incarcerated. Additionally,
while I was falsely imprisoned, I filed a hand written Motion for Early Release, Felony Contempt Arrest
Expungment, Sole Custody and Child Support June 17, 2013 and June 21, 2013 but was denied by the Judges on
both occasions. . For this reason and the below listed reasons, all of Judge Goger’s Orders should be set aside in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1655, “Rule 60. Relief From A Judgment Or Order (b) Grounds for
Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding); wherein the court may relieve a party or its
legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1)
mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (3) fraud (whether previously called
intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party; (6) any other
reason that justifies relief.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2), “which describes
Obstruction of Justice”, wherein “if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding,
hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or
Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or
his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of
persons, to the equal protection of the laws.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3), wherein “if one or more
persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such
conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and
exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived
Page 81 of 89
may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation,
against any one or more of the conspirators”, Civil Rights Act of 1871, Civil Rights Act of 1961, Fifth
Amendment Right, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), Fourteenth Amendments Due Process Clause,
Mugler V. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623 at 661, Sixth Amendment”.), Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act (RICO), which was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of
1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted October 15, 1970), Fernandez v. United States, 2009 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 63796, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. July 24, 2009), Livingston v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 759 F.2d 74
(D.C. Cir. 1985), United States v. Bohr, 406 F. Supp 1218 (E.D. Wis. 1976), United States v. Doe, 935 F.
Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y. 1996), Sealed Appellant v. Sealed Appellee, 130 F.3d 695, 697 (5th Cir.1997), Dean v.
United States, 418 F. Supp. 149(E.D.N.Y. 2006); Doe v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 2004 U.S.
Dist. Lexis 12021(S.D.N.Y. June 29, 2004), Doe, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021 at *46 S.REGION BLACK L.
STUDENTS ASS’NL.J. 31, 32-33 (2012), Burt W. Griffin & Lewis R. Katz OH. FELONY SENT.L. § 5:53
(2008), Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361, 365 (1989), United States v. Lucido, 612 F.3d 871, 872-73
(6th Cir. 2010), 18 U.S.C. § 1503, United States v. McLeod, 385 F.2d 734, 747-50 (5thCir. 1967), Georgia
Statutes O.C.G.A. 41-3-12 (2010), GA CODE ANN. § 9-11-4 (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(c) (2012),
GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(e)(7) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-5(f) (2012), GA CODE ANN .§ 9-3-51(a)
(2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-22 (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-31 (2012), O'Callaghan v. Bank of Eastman,
180 Ga. 812, 818 (1935), GA Code Ann 9-3-1 and 9-3-2 (2012), GA Code Ann § 44-5-163 (2012), GA Code
Ann GA Code Ann § 9-11-26(b)(4)(A)(i) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-1134(b)(c)(2) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-5-7 (2012), GA Code Ann, § 9-11-30 (2012), Carruth v. Brown, 202
Ga. App. 656, 658 (1992), Huff v. Anderson, 212 Ga. 32, 34 (1955), Pitmon v. State, 265 Ga. App. 655, 659
(2004), Giles v. Jones, 169 Ga. App. 882 (1984), GA Constitution Case Co. v. Parker, 161 Ga. App. 614,
617 (1982), Myers v. Barnard, 180 Ga. App. 192, 193 (1986), GA Code Ann § 24-2-2 (2012), Hendrix v.
Byers Bldg. Supply, Inc.,167 Ga. App. 878, 880 (1983), Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire v. Campbell
Page 82 of 89
Nissan N. Am., 258 Ga. App. 767, 768 (2002), Bowen, 246 Ga. App. at 180, Chapman, 220 Ga. App. at 542 ,
GA Code Ann § 24-4-22 Radford v. State, 251 Ga. 50, 53 (1983), Jones v. Krystal Co., 231 Ga. App. 102,
107 (1998), Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery, P.C. v. Nestlehutt 286 Ga. 731, 735-36 (2010), GA Constitution
art. I, § I, para. XI(a), Porter v. Bland, 105 Ga. App. 703, 709 (1962), Long v. Serritt, 102 Ga. App. 550,
554 -55 (1960), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(b) (2012), Suarez v. Halbert,
246 Ga. App. 822, 824 (2000), O.C.G.A. 40-5-54.1 (2010), Georgia Code § 35-3-37, Georgia Code § 24-4-65,
Georgia Code § 15-11-83.… which are direct violations of Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. § 16-10-1: “[A]ny
public officer who willfully and intentionally violates the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall, upon
conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years” and
O.C.G.A. § 15-6-6: “[B]efore entering on the duties of their office, superior court judges must take the oath
required of all civil officers and in addition they must take the following oath: “I swear that I will administer
justice without respect to person and do equal rights to the poor and the rich and that I will faithfully and
impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent on me as judge of the superior courts of this
state, according to the best of my ability and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and Constitution of
this state ability and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state and the
Constitution of the United States. So help me God.” Therefore all of the above listed Officers of the Court
should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of State and Federal laws for the above as well as the below listed
Constitutional Violations.

Given all of the Judges and Officers of the Court use of non judicious use of “Discernment” and
“Best Interest of a Child” in this case, I believe it to be appropriate to once again reiterate the rational for the use
of this flawed Jim Crow / States to Govern as it Pleases New Age Enslavement Program (entitled the Judicial
System), which was initiated and Masterminded by Mayor Kasim Reed (Attorney Willis (Father) Fraternity
Brother. The Jim Crow / States Rights to Govern as it Pleases New Age Enslavement Program was established
as a favor to Attorney Willis (Father) in exchange for Attorney Willis’ shift from practicing Criminal Law to
Page 83 of 89
Politics). This favor was carried out by Chief Judge Cynthia Wright (as a career move favor as she too wanted to
shift into Politics and advance her career (so she presumed), Republican Judge Tom Campbell (who was enlisted
to do all that he could, which included participating in the many-many failed attempts to foreclose on my home
(along with Chief Judge Cynthia Wright (First Trial) who swapped case loads with Republican Judge Tom
Campbell (Wrote the Order to place a lien on my home although I was provided with five (5) days notice of the
Hearing, which he later intended for Chief Judge Cynthia Wright to foreclose on), bankrupt me and of course
take custody of Spencer away (to name a few legal missteps) in an effort to silence me and prevent the four (4)
cases involving the Jim Crow / States Rights to Govern as it Pleases New Age Enslavement Program from
progressing through the Georgia Supreme Court (where I set a Pro Se legal precedence on the issue of Child
Support and Drug Testing in S10F1357 and S10F1358 Willis v. Willis), the U.S. District Court, the U.S. Court
of Appeals, the U.S. Supreme Court and not Attorney General Eric Holder (which is just as challenging as
NONE of these Court entities or anyone in President Obama’s Administration actually follows the Constitution
or ANY of the United States Federal laws) and now Judge John Goger (the latest Judge tapped to participate in
the corruption because he worked for a Federal Judge and knows and understands Federal Law more than any
other Superior Court Judge) was specifically tapped to help silence and get rid of me but their plans were not full
proof and now Judge Goger is in a precarious situation because he finally and suddenly realized that I was
building a Federal Case against him as well everyone else. However, instead of choosing to come clean and own
up to the choices and actions that led him to be in a position to have evidence to support the Federal Case against
him in the hope that he would receive some leniency when indicted and especially when sentenced, Judge Goger
(along with the rest of the Officer of the Court) resorted to one of the even more dirtier forms of Jim Crow /
States Rights to Govern as it Pleases Silence Solutions and that is False imprisonment through Incarceration or
Institutionalization (with the help of my required Psychological Evaluation via their Attorney colleague (Sarah
Brogdon) and / or the carefully selected Lutheran Services of Georgia (managed by another Attorney Colleague
who is the former Senior Advisor to former President Georgia Bush coincidentally)… who would also most
Page 84 of 89
certainly find me mentally insane for just the right political or career favor (I am certain)) in an effort to prevent
any more Policy changes in Georgia, yes - but also Nationwide as the "Insiders" who read my
WhatsBest4Spencer Updates are now - actually working together to change American Policy based on the real
issues that affect all Americans instead of the selfish - greedy Politicians, Judges, Government Employees and
Corporations who benefit from tax payer funded salaries, perks, benefits, incentives, subsidies, kick-backs,
failure to prosecute for crimes understandings, etc..). The Georgia Political and Judicial “Insiders” choice to
govern under the Jim Crow / States to Govern as it Pleases New Age Enslavement Program violates my
Constitutional Rights as a Citizen of the United Stated of America. . . For this reason and the below listed
reasons, all of Judge Goger’s Orders should be set aside in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1655, “Rule 60.
Relief From A Judgment Or Order (b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or
Proceeding); wherein the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final
judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or
excusable neglect; (3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation,
or misconduct by an opposing party; (6) any other reason that justifies relief.”, 42 U.S.C. § 1983,
42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2), “which describes Obstruction of Justice”, wherein “if two or more persons
conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the
due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal
protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to
enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws.”, 42
U.S.C. § 1985 (3), wherein “if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any
act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or
property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United
Page 85 of 89
States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages
occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators”, Civil
Rights Act of 1871, Civil Rights Act of 1961, Fifth Amendment Right, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961),
Fourteenth Amendments Due Process Clause, Mugler V. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623 at 661, Sixth
Amendment”.), Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), which was enacted by
section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted
October 15, 1970), Fernandez v. United States, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63796, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. July 24,
2009), Livingston v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 759 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1985), United States v. Bohr, 406
F. Supp 1218 (E.D. Wis. 1976), United States v. Doe, 935 F. Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y. 1996), Sealed Appellant v.
Sealed Appellee, 130 F.3d 695, 697 (5th Cir.1997), Dean v. United States, 418 F. Supp. 149(E.D.N.Y. 2006);
Doe v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021(S.D.N.Y. June 29, 2004), Doe,
2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 12021 at *46 S.REGION BLACK L. STUDENTS ASS’NL.J. 31, 32-33 (2012), Burt
W. Griffin & Lewis R. Katz OH. FELONY SENT.L. § 5:53 (2008), Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S.
361, 365 (1989), United States v. Lucido, 612 F.3d 871, 872-73 (6th Cir. 2010), 18 U.S.C. § 1503, United
States v. McLeod, 385 F.2d 734, 747-50 (5thCir. 1967), Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. 41-3-12 (2010), GA
CODE ANN. § 9-11-4 (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(c) (2012), GA CODE ANN § 9-11-4(e)(7) (2012),
GA Code Ann § 9-11-5(f) (2012), GA CODE ANN .§ 9-3-51(a) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-3-22 (2012), GA
Code Ann § 9-3-31 (2012), O'Callaghan v. Bank of Eastman, 180 Ga. 812, 818 (1935), GA Code Ann 9-3-1
and 9-3-2 (2012), GA Code Ann § 44-5-163 (2012), GA Code Ann GA Code Ann § 9-11-26(b)(4)(A)(i)
(2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 9-11-34(b)(c)(2) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-5-7
(2012), GA Code Ann, § 9-11-30 (2012), Carruth v. Brown, 202 Ga. App. 656, 658 (1992), Huff v.
Anderson, 212 Ga. 32, 34 (1955), Pitmon v. State, 265 Ga. App. 655, 659 (2004), Giles v. Jones, 169 Ga.
App. 882 (1984), GA Constitution Case Co. v. Parker, 161 Ga. App. 614, 617 (1982), Myers v. Barnard,
180 Ga. App. 192, 193 (1986), GA Code Ann § 24-2-2 (2012), Hendrix v. Byers Bldg. Supply, Inc.,167 Ga.
Page 86 of 89
App. 878, 880 (1983), Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire v. Campbell Nissan N. Am., 258 Ga. App. 767,
768 (2002), Bowen, 246 Ga. App. at 180, Chapman, 220 Ga. App. at 542 , GA Code Ann § 24-4-22 Radford
v. State, 251 Ga. 50, 53 (1983), Jones v. Krystal Co., 231 Ga. App. 102, 107 (1998), Atlanta Oculoplastic
Surgery, P.C. v. Nestlehutt 286 Ga. 731, 735-36 (2010), GA Constitution art. I, § I, para. XI(a), Porter v.
Bland, 105 Ga. App. 703, 709 (1962), Long v. Serritt, 102 Ga. App. 550, 554 -55 (1960), GA Code Ann § 5112-5.1(c) (2012), GA Code Ann § 51-12-5.1(b) (2012), Suarez v. Halbert, 246 Ga. App. 822, 824 (2000),
O.C.G.A. 40-5-54.1 (2010), Georgia Code § 35-3-37, Georgia Code § 24-4-65, Georgia Code § 15-11-83.…
which are direct violations of Georgia Statutes O.C.G.A. § 16-10-1: “[A]ny public officer who willfully and
intentionally violates the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished
by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years” and O.C.G.A. § 15-6-6: “[B]efore entering
on the duties of their office, superior court judges must take the oath required of all civil officers and in addition
they must take the following oath: “I swear that I will administer justice without respect to person and do
equal rights to the poor and the rich and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all
the duties incumbent on me as judge of the superior courts of this state, according to the best of my ability
and understanding, and agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state ability and understanding, and
agreeably to the laws and Constitution of this state and the Constitution of the United States. So help me
God.” Therefore all of the above listed Officers of the Court should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of State
and Federal laws for the above as well as the below listed Constitutional Violations.
Amended Exhibits to incorporate as evidence with the June 15, 2013 Complaint Exhibits
EXHIBIT DJ
12/26/13 D. Williams (339) – June 26, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT DK
5/12/13 D. Williamson (341) – June 26, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT DL
6/1/13 Officer Hightower (225) – June 26, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT DM
6/1/13 Officer Wyches (239) – June 26, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT DN
6/1/13 Officer Benefield (209) – June 26, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
Page 87 of 89
EXHIBIT DO
6/5/13 Investigator C.A. Flournory (980) – June 26, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT DP
4/17/13 Officer M. Voight – June 26, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT DQ
Sheriff B. Crawford – June 26, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT DR
6/24/13 Contempt Arrest Order – Judge John Goger
EXHIBIT DS
Fulton County Sherrif’s Office Proof of Incarceration
EXHIBIT DT
6/26/2013 - Motion Request to have Judge Gail S. Tusan, this weeks Presiding Judge
Rule on the Open Issues contained in this Motion.
EXHIBIT DU
Order on Behavior of Respondent and Subpoenas filed on June 12, 2013
EXHIBIT DV
Order on June 7, 2013 Hearing filed on June 12, 2013
EXHIBIT DW
Attorney Karlise Grier (Guardian Ad Litem) – July 3, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT DX
Ashley Sparks (Ben Hill Teacher) – July 3, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT DY
Vivian Rivera (Ben Hill Teacher) – July 3, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT DZ
12/26/13 D. Williams (339) – July 3, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT EA
5/12/13 D. Williamson (341) – July 3, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT EB
6/1/13 Officer Hightower (225) – July 3, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT EC
6/1/13 Officer Wyches (239) – July 3, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT ED
6/1/13 Officer Benefield (209) – July 3, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT EE
6/5/13 Investigator C.A. Flournory (980) – July 3, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT EF
4/17/13 Officer M. Voight – July 3, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT EG
Sheriff B. Crawford – July 3, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT EH
Genean Womble (Court Reporter) – July 3, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT EI
Attorney Carl J. Willis, II – July 3, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT EJ
Woodward Academy (Third School) – July 3, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT EK
Attorney Karlise Grier (Guardian Ad Litem) – August 6, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT EL
Ashley Sparks (Ben Hill Teacher) – August 6, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT EM
Vivian Rivera (Ben Hill Teacher) – August 6, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
Page 88 of 89
EXHIBIT EN
12/26/13 D. Williams (339) – August 6, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT EO
5/12/13 D. Williamson (341) – August 6, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT EP
6/1/13 Officer Hightower (225) – August 6, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT EQ
6/1/13 Officer Wyches (239) – August 6, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT ER
6/1/13 Officer Benefield (209) – August 6, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT ES
6/5/13 Investigator C.A. Flournory (980) – August 6, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT ET
4/17/13 Officer M. Voight – August 6, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT EU
Sheriff B. Crawford – August 6, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT EV
Genean Womble (Court Reporter) – August 6, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT EW
Attorney Carl J. Willis, II – August 6, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
EXHIBIT EX
Woodward Academy (Third School) – August 6, 2013 Deposition Subpoena
Signed this 31st Day of August, 2013
__________________________________
_______________
Kimberly T. Spence
Date
Page 89 of 89