For any integer n, n2 2 is not divisible by 4.

advertisement
# 13, sec. 4.5/4.6
For any integer n, n2 – 2 is not divisible by 4.
The negation: There exists integer n such that n2 – 2 is divisible by 4.
Proof:
Suppose not. That is, there exists integer n such that n2 – 2 is divisible by 4. By the definition of
divisibility there is some integer m such that
𝑛2 – 2 = 4π‘š
Adding 2 to both sides of the equation, and using addition and distributive properties of equalities we
obtain
(1)
𝑛2 = 4π‘š + 2 = 2(2π‘š + 1).
where 2π‘š + 1 is an integer. Therefore, 𝑛2 is even by the definition of an even number.
According to Proposition 4.5.4 (4.6.4 full edition) of sec. 4.5 (4.6 full edition) 𝑛 is also even. Thus
𝑛 = 2π‘˜
for some integer π‘˜ (by the definition of even numbers). Squaring both sides of the latter equation we get
(2)
𝑛2 = 4 π‘˜ 2 .
Applying the transitive property of equalities to equations (1) and (2) we have
2(2π‘š + 1) = 4 π‘˜ 2 .
Dividing both sides of the equation by 2 we obtain
2π‘š + 1 = 2 π‘˜ 2
Here π‘˜ 2 and π‘š are integers. Using the definitions of odd and even numbers, we obtain that odd number
2π‘š + 1 equals even number 2π‘˜ 2. But the result contradicts the Parity Property according to which every
integer is either even or odd. Therefore for any integer n, n2 – 2 is not divisible by 4.
#14, sec. 4.5/4.6
For all prime numbers, a, b, c, π’‚πŸ + π’ƒπŸ ≠ π’„πŸ
The negation: there exist prime numbers, a, b, c, π’‚πŸ + π’ƒπŸ = π’„πŸ
Proof:
Suppose not. That is, there exist prime numbers π‘Ž, 𝑏, 𝑐, such that π‘Ž2 + 𝑏 2 = 𝑐 2 .
1|Page
According to the definition of a prime number a, b, and c are integers greater than 1.
Subtracting b2 from both sides of the previous equation we obtain
(1)
π‘Ž2 = 𝑐 2 − 𝑏 2 = (𝑐 − 𝑏)(𝑐 + 𝑏)
Since π‘Ž2 and 𝑐 + 𝑏 are positive integers, 𝑐 − 𝑏 must be greater than zero. Otherwise, π‘Ž2 ≠ (𝑐 − 𝑏)(𝑐 +
𝑏).
Let’s assume 𝑐 − 𝑏 > 0.
There are three possible factorizations of π‘Ž2 :
π‘Ž2 = π‘Ž βˆ™ π‘Ž = π‘Ž2 βˆ™ 1 = 1 βˆ™ π‘Ž2
Case I: Let π‘Ž2 = π‘Ž βˆ™ π‘Ž . Using the uniqueness of prime factorization and equation (1) we obtain
𝑐 − 𝑏 = π‘Ž, 𝑐 + 𝑏 = π‘Ž.
Solving the system of equations we find that 𝑐 = π‘Ž and 𝑏 = 0 which contradicts the supposition that b is
prime.
Case II: Let π‘Ž2 = π‘Ž2 βˆ™ 1. From equation (1), we obtain that −𝑏 = π‘Ž2 , 𝑐 + 𝑏 = 1 . The latter equation
cannot be satisfied, because c and b are both greater than 0.
Case III: Let π‘Ž2 = 1 βˆ™ π‘Ž2 . Using equation (1) we obtain 𝑐 + 𝑏 = π‘Ž2 , 𝑐 − 𝑏 = 1. If 𝑐 − 𝑏 = 1, then c and
b are consecutive integers. Due to the parity property, one of the numbers is even and the other one is
odd. There is only one even prime number 2 with the consecutive prime integer 3. But if c=3 and b=2
and c+b=5. Since 5 is not a perfect square, a is not an integer which contradicts the assumption that a is
prime.
Therefore, For all prime numbers, a, b, c, π’‚πŸ + π’ƒπŸ ≠ π’„πŸ
#15, sec. 4.5
If a, b, c are integers and π‘Ž2 + 𝑏 2 = 𝑐 2 , then at least one of a and b is even.
The negation: there are integers a, b, c such that π‘Ž2 + 𝑏 2 = 𝑐 2 and a and b are both odd.
Proof:
Suppose not. That is, there are integers a, b, c such that π‘Ž2 + 𝑏 2 = 𝑐 2 and a and b are both odd.
Using the definition of odd integers for π‘Ž and 𝑏 we obtain
π‘Ž = 2𝑛 + 1 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑏 = 2π‘š + 1
where 𝑛and π‘š are integers.
2|Page
Making the substitutions and using the rules of algebra we have
𝑐 2 = π‘Ž2 + 𝑏 2 = (2𝑛 + 1)2 + (2π‘š + 1)2 = 2(2𝑛2 + 2𝑛 + 2π‘š2 + 2π‘š + 1)
Since 2𝑛2 + 2𝑛 + 2π‘š2 + 2π‘š + 1 is an integer as a sum and product of integers, 𝑐 2 is even by the
definition of an even number.
According to Proposition 4.5.4 (or 4.6.4), if c2 is even, then c is even. Applying the definition of even
numbers to 𝑐 we have
𝑐 = 2π‘˜.
where π‘˜ is integer. Squaring both sides we receive
𝑐 2 = 4π‘˜ 2
Since 𝑐 2 = 2(2𝑛2 + 2𝑛 + 2π‘š2 + 2π‘š + 1) and 𝑐 2 = 4π‘˜ 2 , using the transitive property of equality we
obtain
2(2𝑛2 + 2𝑛 + 2π‘š2 + 2π‘š + 1) = 4π‘˜ 2
Dividing both sides of the equation by 2 we have
(1)
2𝑛2 + 2𝑛 + 2π‘š2 + 2π‘š + 1 = 2π‘˜ 2
Let 𝑠 = 𝑛2 + 𝑛 + π‘š2 + π‘š. Then equation (1) can be written as
2𝑠 + 1 = 2π‘˜ 2
Here 𝑠 and π‘˜ 2 are integers (as sum or product of integers). Using the definition of odd and even numbers
we obtain that an odd integer 2𝑠 + 1 equals even integer 2π‘˜ 2 which contradicts the Parity Property.
Therefore, if a, b, c are integers and π’‚πŸ + π’ƒπŸ = π’„πŸ , then at least one of a and b is even.
3|Page
Download