Mr Karel De Gucht Member of the European Commission European Commission B-1049 Brussels Brussels, 13 January 2014 DB-REX/2014/D/109 Subject: Serious Violations of Chapter 13 of the EU-Korea FTA Dear Commissioner: The EU Domestic Advisory Group (DAG) set up under Chapter 13 of the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement considered labour developments in Korea at their last meeting in December. As you know, the government of the Republic of Korea made several commitments to the EU under that Chapter concerning Sustainable Development. These commitments include, among others, “respecting, promoting and realising, in their laws and practices, the principles concerning the fundamental rights” as set forth in the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work as well as to "make continued and sustained efforts towards ratifying the fundamental ILO Conventions as well as the other Conventions that are classified as 'up-to-date' by the ILO" (Article 13.4.3). In their discussion, the DAG took account of the Conclusions of the 2nd meeting of the Civil Society Forum under the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement, Seoul, 12-13 September 2013, which had discussed at length an opinion on Fundamental rights at work adopted by the EU DAG in May 2013 (attached). This had been requested by the TSDC from both DAGs at the previous Civil Society Forum meeting in Brussels. Those Conclusions read i.a.: On the issue of fundamental rights at work, the CSF: asks the Korean government to take the necessary measures and remove hindrances to enable the ratification of the remaining ILO Fundamental Conventions, namely Convention No 87 on Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise, Convention No. 98 on the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining, Convention No. 29 on Forced Labour and Convention No 105 on the Abolition of Forced Labour that Korea has not yet ratified; is of the view that the promotion and consolidation of social dialogue will facilitate the creation of the enabling conditions for the ratification of these four Conventions in Korea and will also contribute to ensure full implementation of the ILO Fundamental Conventions in both Korea and the EU; 1 EESC-2014-01767-00-00-TCD-TRA EN recommends, as far as the issue of forced labour is concerned, changes in the imprisonment regime in Korea; urges both Korea and EU Member States to ensure full implementation of the ILO Fundamental Conventions which have already been ratified. The CSF requests to be informed on the cases of non-compliance of OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises by Korean and EU multinationals; is of the view that full cooperation with the ILO will assist the progress towards the development of the necessary conditions for the ratification of the remaining four ILO Fundamental Conventions by Korea; has decided to continue its work in this domain. The December DAG received reports of further cases of concern arising since the CSF meeting, which are detailed in the Annex to this letter. It is clear that the Korean Government, far from taking the views of the CSF into account and acting to fulfil its obligations, is further violating its undertakings as set down in the FTA. We are deeply troubled by the Government’s blatant disregard for international labour standards in practice, which it is bound to respect irrespective of ratification as a member of the ILO1. As explained in detail in the Annex, the Government is in fact engaging in a concerted attack on trade unions. Over the past year, the ILO has intervened repeatedly with the government to cease the violations, some of which are related to issues that have been under ILO supervision for years, but the government has ignored each of these entreaties. These same underlying legal concerns are also reflected in the 29 May 2013 EU DAG Opinion on labour standards in Korea. The EU DAG believes that the Republic of Korea is in serious violation of its commitments under Article 13.4.3 of the FTA, notably the exercise of the right to freedom of association. We request that you invoke Article 13.14 and proceed to consultations, as these recent cases (and the matters raised in the DAG’s Opinion) are very serious and require immediate attention. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Yours sincerely, Thomas Jenkins Chair EU-Korea Domestic Advisory Group 1 We also note that the Republic of Korea has not ratified half of the fundamental conventions, namely ILO Convention No. 87 on Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise, Convention No. 98 on the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining, Convention 29 of Forced Labour or Convention 105 on the Abolition of Forced Labour. We are currently unaware of any effort by the government to ratify them. 2 EESC-2014-01767-00-00-TCD-TRA APPENDIX Key Cases of Concern Although labour violations are widespread, we raise with you these three cases as the basis for initiating consultations with the government. 1. The Korean Government Employee’s Union (KGEU) On 2 August 2013, the Ministry of Employment and Labour rejected for the fourth time the registration of the Korean Government Employees Union (KGEU) due to the composition of its membership. In 2012, the ILO Committee on Freedom of Association, in Case No. 1865, concluded with regard to the KGEU registration issue: The Committee recalls that when it last examined the case, it urged the Government to repeal the provisions prohibiting dismissed and unemployed workers from keeping their union membership and making non-union members ineligible to stand for trade union office (section 2(4)(d) and 23(1) of TULRAA) [see 353rd Report, para. 749(c)(iv)]. Noting with regret that the Government has not repealed these provisions, the Committee once again urges the Government to do so and to take all possible measures with a view to achieving conciliation between the Government and the KGEU so that the latter may continue to exist and ultimately to register within the framework of the legislation, which should be in line with freedom of association principles. The latest attempt at registration began on 27 May 2013, when the KGEU submitted a new application. The Ministry of Labour requested supplementary information from the KGEU by 24 June and, following negotiations between the union and the government’s public officers labour relations division, extended the deadline to 22 July. In July, intense negotiations between the parties continued, during which the KGEU proposed amendments to its constitution which would have inserted the clause “according to the relevant laws and regulations” in sections relevant to union membership. On 11 July, it was believed that these amendments had been accepted by the government and had cleared the way for the registration of the union. The KGEU convened a congress to revise the constitution and on 22 July submitted the supplementary materials. On 2 August, the government returned the application and again denied registration stating that the constitution could still be interpreted to allow dismissed workers to retain membership. Regardless as to whether the union’s constitution could be so interpreted, the ILO CFA has made clear in this case that the fact that a union is constitutionally authorized to include dismissed workers as members is not a legitimate reason to reject the union’s registration. Most recently, the government is now using the argument of an alleged lack of political neutrality to obtain warrants to search and seize the servers of the KGEU and have announced its intention to do the same with the KTU (below). The ILO has previously denounced the prohibition on political expression under Section 4 of the Act on the Establishment and Operation of Public Officials’ Trade Unions in ILO CFA Case 1865, Report 363 March 2012, in which it found at ¶¶ 131-32: The Committee recalls that provisions imposing a general prohibition on political activities by trade unions for the promotion of their specific objectives are contrary to the principles of freedom of association.…In light of the abovementioned principles, the Committee once again requests the Government to ensure that public officials’ trade 3 EESC-2014-01767-00-00-TCD-TRA unions have the possibility to express their views publicly on the wider economic and social policy questions which have a direct impact on their members’ interests, including during their meetings, in their publications and in the course of other trade union activities. We would also note that the ILO CFA has in the past stated that, “With regard to searches of trade union premises… the right to adequate protection of trade union property is one of those civil liberties which are essential for the normal exercise of trade union rights.” We recognize that the government had a warrant; however, its authority is based on a law which the ILO has found violates the right to freedom of association. In our view, the searches and seizures of trade union property have nothing to do with the KGEU’s alleged electioneering activities. Rather, it is clear they have no other purpose than to intimidate the leaders and members of the KGEU, as well as trade unionists generally. It sends a clear message that the government will take any and all measures necessary to prohibit the exercise of freedom of association of any union, particularly in the public sector, that opposes the anti-union policies of the government. 2. Korean Teachers and Educators Union (KTU) Earlier this year, the Ministry of Employment and Labour, on the orders of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, threatened to cancel the registration of the Korean Teachers and Education Workers Union (KTU) if it did not amend its constitution in line with Korean law. The government subsequently set a deadline of 23 October 2013, which it observed. On 24 October, the legal status of the KTU was withdrawn. Although a temporary injunction was recently issued suspending the deregistration order, we remain concerned that the union may lose its legal status this year when the matter is before the courts. On 19 November, the government filed an immediate appeal to the Seoul High Court against the accepted injunction. If the High Court decides in favour of the government at the immediate appeal case, the KTU will be decertified immediately. In short, two court cases are going on now; the immediate appeal against the injunction, and the formal court procedure mentioned above. As with the KGEU, the KTU was de-registered because of the composition of the union’s membership - the KTU constitution allows dismissed workers to remain members of the union. Around 60 members of KTU were dismissed during the previous government for their activities, including expressing their opinion on the governments’ education policy and/or for donations to progressive political parties. Roughly 20 remain dismissed. These workers, whose dismissals are also illegal under international standards, were considered members of the KTU. As mentioned above, the ILO has criticised these provisions and has urged their repeal. 3. Korean Railway Workers Union (KRWU) The KRWU’s strike, which lasted from December 9 to December 31, was consistent with international labour law and would have been deemed legal in Europe. Under Korean law, however, the government can (and has) declared as illegal a strike over privatization (government policy). The long-standing view of the ILO is that workers are permitted to strike over issues of social and economic policy2. During the strike, KORAIL (the state-run rail company) filed charges of obstruction of business against 191 KRWU officers. Arrest warrants were issued for 35 of these individuals. Of the 35, 6 were arrested during the strike and 16 when they voluntarily turned 2 See CFA Digest ¶ 526, “The occupational and economic interests which workers defend through the exercise of the right to strike do not only concern better working conditions or collective claims of an occupational nature, but also the seeking of solutions to economic and social policy questions and problems facing the undertaking which are of direct concern to the workers.” 4 EESC-2014-01767-00-00-TCD-TRA themselves in for questioning after the strike had ended. Two of the individuals arrested during the strike have been imprisoned until trial. Thirteen union officers, including the central leadership, are still wanted for arrest based suspicion of ‘obstruction of business’. The ILO has repeatedly denounced the use of this penal provision against peaceful strikes, indeed even with regard to the prior rail strike. During the strike, police raided the offices of the union and confiscated union property. They also obtained records of social media applications used by KRWU members for personal communications. KORAIL removed some 8,000 workers from their job positions. While most of these workers have been returned to their posts since the end of the strike, roughly 650 are still suspended from their positions. KORAIL has begun the process of deciding severe disciplinary measures (suspension or dismissal) against over 500 workers. The KORAIL disciplinary committee will begin meeting to hear these cases on January 9. Decisions on the first cases heard are expected on January 13. KORAIL has said that decisions on disciplinary actions against 165 central leaders will be made by January 28 before the start of the lunar New Year. It is expected that at least these 165 will face dismissal and probably many others. Previously, the company announced plans to take disciplinary actions against all workers who participated in the strike and it is expected that the number facing disciplinary proceedings will increase. The government (Ministry of National Defense) mobilized the military as replacement workers during the strike. Students and other insufficiently trained personnel were also used as replacement workers, which in addition to being a violation of freedom of association posed a serious safety risk. Several accidents occurred as a result, including one which led to the death of an elderly passenger. Finally, KORAIL has filed a damages suit against the KRWU and individual KRWU officers for 15.29 billion Won (appx € 10.5 million) and applied for a temporary freeze on KRWU assess worth 11.6 billion Won (appx € 8 million). Of note, in 2009, the KRWU carried out a strike that complied with the legal requirements under Korean labour law. Nevertheless, the government declared the strike to be illegal. Subsequently, the government resorted to illegal measures to respond to the strike, including the mobilization of the military as replacement workers, harsh disciplinary actions and dismissals of peacefully striking workers and the issuance of a mandatory return-to-work order. Leaders of the KRWU were charged with “obstruction of business” and imprisoned. Close to 200 union officers were dismissed and 15,000 members were subjected to disciplinary actions of varying degrees. The KRWU was sued for damages of 10 billion Won (roughly € 7 million). In response, a complaint was filed with the ILO Committee on Freedom of Association (CFA) in January 2011 which alleged violations related to the government’s repression of the KRWU strike (among other cases)3 . After a full examination of the case, the CFA issued recommendations calling for the “immediate dropping of criminal charges (both fines and prison sentences) brought under Section 314 of the Penal Code (‘obstruction of business’) against union officials and members” of the KRWU who had participated in the strike, “the immediate reinstatement” of dismissed KRWU members and the lifting of all related disciplinary measures4. It has been nearly a year since these recommendations were issued and the Korean government has given no indication that it will comply. 4. Illegal Raid of KCTU Headquarters On December 22, 2013, the police raided the building where the headquarters of the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU) are located. Around 5,000 riot police, including some 900 of 3 4 See CFA Case No. 2829. See CFA Report 365 (Nov 2012). 5 EESC-2014-01767-00-00-TCD-TRA SWAT Team members, were deployed on the assumption that 6 of KRWU leaders who are on the police’s wanted list were staying in the office. Such a raid on the office of a national center of trade unions is unprecedented. It never happened even under the military dictatorship. The KCTU head office is located on the 13th, 14th and 15th floors in the building of Kyunghayung Shinmunsa- a major Korean newspaper. On December 22, 2013, at 9am, the police cordoned off the building. From then on, members of the KCTU couldn’t enter or leave the building. After the building was surrounded, the police moved to arrest the 6 KRWU leaders. The Kyunghyang Sinmunsa, the owner of the building and the KCTU, the renter of the 13th~15th floors, pointed out that the police didn’t have a warrant to search the building and that their actions would be illegal. However, the police, without any review on the illegality of their actions, pushed into the building. As the police were unable to get through the locked doors, they invited the fire services to smash down the glass doors in front of and on the sides of the building. While police were pushing into the building, other groups of police arrested indiscriminately some of the protestors outside. The police also used pepper spray against the protesters. In total, 138 were arrested including Yoo, Ki-soo, Secretary General of the KCTU and other 2 central leaders, and Kim, Jeong-hun, the President of the Korean Teachers and Education Workers Union (KTU) and other 2 presidents of KCTU affiliates. All of those arrested were released after 48 hours of custody except Kim, Jeong-hun, President of the KTU. The police sought a detention warrant but it was rejected by the court. All of them were charged with “Obstruction of Justice”. The police reached the 13th, 14th and 15th floor of the building and searched every corner of the KCTU’s offices without proper warrants. During the illegal search, the police destroyed KCTU’s furniture and fixtures, including almost all of the doors and door-locks, tables and chairs, etc. None of the persons sought by the police were in the offices. The entire ordeal lasted about 12 hours. _____________ 6 EESC-2014-01767-00-00-TCD-TRA