SPP/APR Indicator Measurements & Data Sources
PART C
Monitoring Priority
Indicator
Measurement
Data Source(s)
SpEd RC
Early Intervention
Services In
Natural
Environments
Indicator C1:
Percent = [(# of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who receive the
early intervention services on their IFSPs in a timely manner)
divided by the (total # of infants and toddlers with IFSPs)] times
100.
SPR&I PCR
Data, SECC
2006-07
SPR&I,
SECC
2006-07
Paul Brooks
AEPSi
reporting
system
2009-10?
Percent of infants and toddlers
with IFSPs who receive the
early intervention services on
their IFSPs in a timely manner.
Indicator C2:
Percent of infants and toddlers
with IFSPs who primarily receive
early intervention services in the
home or programs for typically
developing children.
Indicator C3:
Percent of infants and toddlers
with IFSPs who demonstrate
improved:
A. Positive social-emotional
skills (including social
relationships);
B. Acquisition and use of
knowledge and skills
(including early language/
communication); and
C. Use of appropriate
behaviors to meet their
needs.
Account for untimely receipt of services.
Percent = [(# of infants and toddlers with IFSPs who primarily
receive early intervention services in the home or programs for
typically developing children) divided by the (total # of infants and
toddlers with IFSPs)] times 100.
A. Positive social-emotional skills (including social
relationships):
a. Percent of infants and toddlers who did not improve
functioning = [(# of infants and toddlers who did not
improve functioning) divided by the (# of infants and
toddlers with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
b. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning
but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning
comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of infants and
toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to
move nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged
peers) divided by the (# of infants and toddlers with IEPs
assessed)] times 100.
c.
Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning
to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it
= [(# of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to
a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it)
divided by the (# of infants and toddlers with IEPs
assessed)] times 100.
d. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning
to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of
infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a
level comparable to same-aged peers) divided by the (#
of infants and toddlers with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
PART C
Page 1 of 16
August 2007
SPP/APR Indicator Measurements & Data Sources
Monitoring Priority
Indicator
Indicator C3 Continued
Early Intervention
Services In Natural
Environments
Measurement
Data Source(s)
SpEd RC
e. Percent of infants and toddlers who maintained
functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers =
[(# of infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at
a level comparable to same-aged peers) divided by the
(# of infants and toddlers with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
If a + b + c + d +e does not sum to 100%, explain the difference.
B. Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early
language/communication and early literacy):
a. Percent of infants and toddlers who did not improve
functioning = [(# of infants and toddlers who did not
improve functioning) divided by the (# of infants and
toddlers with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
b. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning
but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning
comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of infants and
toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to
move nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged
peers) divided by the (# of infants and toddlers with IEPs
assessed)] times 100.
c.
Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning
to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it
= [(# of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to
a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it)
divided by the (# of infants and toddlers with IEPs
assessed)] times 100.
d. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning
to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of
infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a
level comparable to same-aged peers) divided by the (#
of infants and toddlers with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
e. Percent of infants and toddlers who maintained
functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers =
[(# of infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at
a level comparable to same-aged peers) divided by the
(# of infants and toddlers with IEPs assessed)] times
100.
If a + b + c + d + e does not sum to 100%, explain the difference.
PART C
Page 2 of 16
August 2007
SPP/APR Indicator Measurements & Data Sources
Monitoring Priority
Early Intervention
Services In Natural
Environments
Indicator
Measurement
Data Source(s)
Indicator C3 Continued
C. Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs:
SpEd RC
a. Percent of infants and toddlers who did not improve
functioning = [(# of infants and toddlers who did not
improve functioning) divided by the (# of infants and
toddlers with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
b. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning
but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning
comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of infants and
toddlers who improved functioning but not sufficient to
move nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged
peers) divided by the (# of infants and toddlers with IEPs
assessed)] times 100.
c.
Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning
to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it
= [(# of infants and toddlers who improved functioning to
a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it)
divided by the (# of infants and toddlers with IEPs
assessed)] times 100.
d. Percent of infants and toddlers who improved functioning
to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of
infants and toddlers who improved functioning to reach a
level comparable to same-aged peers) divided by the (#
of infants and toddlers with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
e. Percent of infants and toddlers who maintained
functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers =
[(# of infants and toddlers who maintained functioning at
a level comparable to same-aged peers) divided by the
(# of infants and toddlers with IEPs assessed)] times
100.
If a + b + c + d + e does not sum to 100%, explain the difference.
PART C
Page 3 of 16
August 2007
SPP/APR Indicator Measurements & Data Sources
Monitoring Priority
Indicator
Measurement
Indicator C4:
A. Percent = [(# of respondent families participating in Part C
who report that early intervention services have helped the
family know their rights) divided by (the # of respondent
families participating in Part C)] times 100.
Percent of families participating
in Part C who report that early
intervention services have
helped the family:
A. Know their rights;
B. Effectively communicate
their children's needs; and
C. Help their children develop
and learn.
Effective General
Supervision Part
C/Child Find
Indicator C5:
Percent of infants and toddlers
birth to 1 with IFSPs compared
to:
A. Other States with similar
eligibility definitions; and
B. National data.
Indicator C6:
Percent of infants and toddlers
birth to 3 with IFSPs compared
to:
A. Other States with similar
eligibility definitions; and
B. National data.
Indicator C7:
Percent of eligible infants and
toddlers with IFSPs for whom an
evaluation and assessment and
an initial IFSP meeting were
conducted within Part C’s 45day timeline.
PART C
B. Percent = [(# of respondent families participating in Part C
who report that early intervention services have helped the
family effectively communicate their children's needs) divided
by (the # of respondent families participating in Part C times)]
100.
Data Source(s)
SpEd RC
SECC,
Avatar
(contractor)
2006-07
SPR&I,
SECC, US
Census
2006-07
SPR&I,
SECC, US
Census
2006-07
EI/ECSE
Monthly
Count
2006-07
C. Percent = [(# of respondent families participating in Part C
who report that early intervention services have helped the
family help their children develop and learn) divided by (the #
of respondent families participating in Part C)] times 100.
A. Percent = [(# of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPs)
divided by the (population of infants and toddlers birth to 1)]
times 100 compared to the same percent calculated for other
States with similar (narrow, moderate or broad) eligibility
definitions.
B. Percent = [(# of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPs)
divided by the (population of infants and toddlers birth to 1)]
times 100 compared to National data.
A. Percent = [(# of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPs)
divided by the (population of infants and toddlers birth to 3)]
times 100 compared to the same percent calculated for other
States with similar (narrow, moderate or broad) eligibility
definitions.
B. Percent = [(# of infants and toddlers birth to 3 with IFSPs)
divided by the (population of infants and toddlers birth to 3)]
times 100 compared to National data.
Percent = [(# of eligible infants and toddlers with IFSPs for whom
an evaluation and assessment and an initial IFSP meeting was
conducted within Part C’s 45-day timeline) divided by the (# of
eligible infants and toddlers evaluated and assessed)] times 100.
Account for untimely evaluations.
Page 4 of 16
August 2007
SPP/APR Indicator Measurements & Data Sources
Monitoring Priority
Indicator
Measurement
Effective General
Supervision Part
C/Effective
Transition
Indicator C8:
A. Percent = [(# of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP
with transition steps and services) divided by the (# of
children exiting Part C)] times 100.
Percent of all children exiting
Part C who received timely
transition planning to support
the child’s transition to
preschool and other appropriate
community services by their
third birthday including:
A. IFSPs with transition steps
and services;
Data Source(s)
SpEd RC
SPR&I PCR
Data
2006-07
SPR&I PCR
Data,
Dispute
Resolution
Database
No
Dispute
Resolution
Database
No
B. Percent = [(# of children exiting Part C and potentially eligible
for Part B where notification to the LEA occurred) divided by
the (# of children exiting Part C who were potentially eligible
for Part B)] times 100.
C. Percent = [(# of children exiting Part C and potentially eligible
for Part B where the transition conference occurred) divided
by the (# of children exiting Part C who were potentially
eligible for Part B)] times 100.
B. Notification to LEA, if child
potentially eligible for Part
B; and
C. Transition conference, if
child potentially eligible for
Part B.
Effective General
Supervision Part
C/General
Supervision
Indicator C9:
General supervision system
(including monitoring,
complaints, hearings, etc.)
identifies and corrects
noncompliance as soon as
possible but in no case later
than one year from
identification.
Indicator C10:
Percent of signed written
complaints with reports issued
that were resolved within 60-day
timeline or a timeline extended
for exceptional circumstances
with respect to a particular
complaint.
PART C
Percent of noncompliance corrected within one year of
identification:
a. # of findings of noncompliance
b. # of corrections completed as soon as possible but in no
case later than one year from identification.
Percent = [(b) divided by (a)] times 100.
For any noncompliance not corrected within one year of
identification, describe what actions, including technical
assistance and/or enforcement that the State has taken.
Measurement: Percent = [(1.1(b) + 1.1(c)) divided by 1.1] times
100.
Page 5 of 16
August 2007
SPP/APR Indicator Measurements & Data Sources
Monitoring Priority
Indicator
Measurement
Indicator C11:
Percent = [(3.2(a) + 3.2(b)) divided by 3.2] times 100.
Percent of fully adjudicated due
process hearing requests that
were fully adjudicated within the
applicable timeline.
Indicator C12:
State reported data (618 and
State Performance Plan and
Annual Performance Report)
are timely and accurate.
Dispute
Resolution
Database
No
Dispute
Resolution
Database
No
Dispute
Resolution
Database
No
All Data
Sources
No
Percent = [(2.1(a)(i) + 2.1(b)(i)) divided by 2.1] times 100.
Percent of mediations held that
resulted in mediation
agreements.
Indicator C14:
SpEd RC
Percent = [3.1(a) divided by 3.1] times 100.
Percent of hearing requests that
went to resolution sessions that
were resolved through
resolution session settlement
agreements (applicable if Part B
due process procedures are
adopted).
Indicator C13:
Data Source(s)
Measurement: State reported data, including 618 data, State
performance plan, and annual performance reports, are:
a. Submitted on or before due dates (February 1 for child
count, including race and ethnicity, settings and November
1 for exiting, personnel, dispute resolution); and
b. Accurate (describe mechanisms for ensuring error free,
consistent, valid and reliable data and evidence that these
standards are met).
PART C
Page 6 of 16
August 2007
SPP/APR Indicator Measurements & Data Sources
PART B
Monitoring Priority
Indicator
Measurement
FAPE in the LRE
Indicator B1:
The number of students graduating with a regular diploma during
the current school year divided by the number of students
graduating with a regular diploma plus the number of students
reported as dropping out during the current year in grades 9-12.
Percent of youth with IEPs
graduating from high school with
a regular diploma compared to
percent of all youth in the State
graduating with a regular
diploma
Indicator B2:
Percent of youth with IEPs
dropping out of high school
compared to the percent of all
youth in the State dropping out
of high school.
Oregon Administrative Rule defines graduation as receiving a
regular diploma and specifies the minimum diploma requirements.
Those students who receive modified diplomas or alternate
documents are not included as either graduates or dropouts.
Participation and performance
of children with disabilities on
statewide assessments:
A. Percent of districts that
have a disability subgroup
that meets the State’s
minimum “n” size meeting
the State’s AYP objectives
for progress for disability
subgroup.
PART B
SpEd RC
High School
Completer,
Early
Leaver,
SpEd Exit,
SECC
2006-07
for
2005-2006
and
2006-2007
data
Early
Leaver,
SpEd Exit,
SECC, Fall
Membership
2006-07
for
2005-2006
and
2006-2007
data
AYP,
Statewide
Assessment,
SECC,
Spring
Membership
2006-07
The number of students in grades 9 and above that dropped out
of school in the current year divided by the October 1 student
membership for grades 9 and above. The dropout rate for
students with disabilities is based on the number of special
education students in grades 9 and above that dropped out of
school in the current year divided by the December 1 SECC for
grades 9 and above.
Oregon Administrative Rule defines dropout as a student who
withdraws from school and did not graduate or transfer to another
school that leads to graduation. Dropouts do not include students
who are home schooled, are enrolled in an alternative school or
hospital education program, are enrolled in a juvenile detention
facility, are enrolled in a foreign exchange program, are
temporarily absent because of suspension, a family emergency,
or severe health problems that prevent attendance at school,
received a GED certificate, received an adult high school diploma
from a community college, or are deceased.
Indicator 3:
Data Source(s)
A. Percent = [(# of districts meeting the State’s AYP objectives
for progress for the disability subgroup (children with IEPs))
divided by the (total # of districts that have a disability
subgroup that meets the State’s minimum “n” size in the
State)] times 100.
B. Participation rate =
a. # of children with IEPs in assessed grades;
b. # of children with IEPs in regular assessment with no
accommodations (percent = [(b) divided by (a)] times
100);
Page 7 of 16
August 2007
SPP/APR Indicator Measurements & Data Sources
Monitoring Priority
FAPE in the LRE
Indicator
B. Participation rate for
children with IEPs in a
regular assessment with no
accommodations; regular
assessment with
accommodations; alternate
assessment against grade
level standards; alternate
assessment against
alternate achievement
standards.
C. Proficiency rate for children
with IEPs against grade
level standards and
alternate achievement
standards.
Measurement
c.
Data Source(s)
SpEd RC
# of children with IEPs in regular assessment with
accommodations (percent = [(c) divided by (a)] times
100);
d. # of children with IEPs in alternate assessment against
grade level achievement standards (percent = [(d) divided
by (a)] times 100); and
e. # of children with IEPs in alternate assessment against
alternate achievement standards (percent = [(e) divided
by (a)] times 100).
Account for any children included in a, but not included in b, c, d,
or e above.
Overall Percent = [(b + c + d + e) divided by (a)].
C. Proficiency rate =
a. # of children with IEPs in assessed grades;
b. # of children with IEPs in assessed grades who are
proficient or above as measured by the regular
assessment with no accommodations (percent = [(b)
divided by (a)] times 100);
c.
# of children with IEPs in assessed grades who are
proficient or above as measured by the regular
assessment with accommodations (percent = [(c) divided
by (a)] times 100);
d. # of children with IEPs in assessed grades who are
proficient or above as measured by the alternate
assessment against grade level achievement standards
(percent = [(d) divided by (a)] times 100); and
e. # of children with IEPs in assessed grades who are
proficient or above as measured against alternate
achievement standards (percent = [(e) divided by (a)]
times 100).
PART B
Page 8 of 16
August 2007
SPP/APR Indicator Measurements & Data Sources
Monitoring Priority
Indicator
Measurement
Data Source(s)
SpEd RC
SET, SECC,
SPR&I
2006-07
SECC,
SPR&I
2006-07
Account for any children included in a, but not included in b, c, d,
or e above.
FAPE in the LRE
Overall Percent = [(b + c + d + e) divided by (a)].
Indicator B4:
A.
Percent = [(# of districts identified by the State as having
significant discrepancies in the rates of suspensions and
expulsions of children with disabilities for greater than 10
days in a school year) divided by the (# of districts in the
State)] times 100.
B.
Percent = [(# of districts identified by the State as having
significant discrepancies in the rates of suspensions and
expulsions for greater than 10 days in a school year of
children with disabilities by race ethnicity) divided by the (#
of districts in the State)] times 100.
Rates of suspension and
expulsion:
A. Percent of districts identified
by the State as having a
significant discrepancy in
the rates of suspensions
and expulsions of children
with disabilities for greater
than 10 days in a school
year; and
B. Percent of districts identified
by the State as having a
significant discrepancy in
the rates of suspensions
and expulsions of greater
than 10 days in a school
year of children with
disabilities by race and
ethnicity.
Indicator B5:
Oregon uses a two-tier process to define significant discrepancy.
Significant discrepancy is defined as a rate of
suspension/expulsion of one day or greater based on chi-square
analysis and/or a ≥ 1% suspension/expulsion rate of special
education students within a district (tier one) and not justified by
unique district characteristics (tier two).
A.
Percent = [(# of children with IEPs removed from regular
class less than 21% of the day) divided by the (total # of
students aged 6 through 21 with IEPs)] times 100.
B.
Percent = [(# of children with IEPs removed from regular
class greater than 60% of the day) divided by the (total # of
students aged 6 through 21 with IEPs)] times 100.
C.
Percent = [(# of children with IEPs served in public or
private separate schools, residential placements, or
homebound or hospital placements) divided by the (total #
of students aged 6 through 21 with IEPs)] times 100.
Percent of children with IEPs
aged 6 through 21:
A. Removed from regular class
less than 21% of the day;
B. Removed from regular class
greater than 60% of the
day; or
C. Served in public or private
separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound or hospital
placements.
PART B
Page 9 of 16
August 2007
SPP/APR Indicator Measurements & Data Sources
Monitoring Priority
FAPE in the LRE
Indicator
Measurement
Indicator B6:
Percent = [(# of preschool children with IEPs who received
special education services in settings with typically developing
peers) divided by the (total # of preschool children with IEPs)]
times 100.
Percent of preschool children
with IEPs who received special
education and related services
in settings with typically
developing peers (i.e., early
childhood settings, home, and
part-time early childhood/parttime early childhood special
education settings).
Indicator B7:
Percent of preschool children
with IEPs who demonstrate
improved:
A. Positive social-emotional
skills (including social
relationships);
B. Acquisition and use of
knowledge and skills
(including early language/
communication and early
literacy); and
Use of appropriate behaviors to
meet their needs.
Data Source(s)
SpEd RC
SECC,
SPR&I
2006-07
(EI/ECSE)
Paul Brooks
AEPSi
reporting
system
2009-10?
(EI/ECSE)
A. Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships):
a. Percent of preschool children who did not improve
functioning = [(# of preschool children who did not
improve functioning) divided by the (# of preschool
children with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
b. Percent of preschool children who improved functioning
but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning
comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of preschool
children who improved functioning but not sufficient to
move nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged
peers) divided by the (# of preschool children with IEPs
assessed)] times 100.
c.
Percent of preschool children who improved functioning
to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it
= [(# of preschool children who improved functioning to a
level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it)
divided by the (# of preschool children with IEPs
assessed)] times 100.
d. Percent of preschool children who improved functioning
to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of
preschool children who improved functioning to reach a
level comparable to same-aged peers) divided by the (#
of preschool children with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
PART B
Page 10 of 16
August 2007
SPP/APR Indicator Measurements & Data Sources
Monitoring Priority
Indicator
Indicator B7 Continued
FAPE in the LRE
Measurement
Data Source(s)
SpEd RC
e. Percent of preschool children who maintained functioning
at a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of
preschool children who maintained functioning at a level
comparable to same-aged peers) divided by the (# of
preschool children with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
If a + b + c + d +e does not sum to 100%, explain the difference.
B. Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early
language/communication and early literacy):
a. Percent of preschool children who did not improve
functioning = [(# of preschool children who did not
improve functioning) divided by the (# of preschool
children with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
b. Percent of preschool children who improved functioning
but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning
comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of preschool
children who improved functioning but not sufficient to
move nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged
peers) divided by the (# of preschool children with IEPs
assessed)] times 100.
c.
Percent of preschool children who improved functioning
to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it
= [(# of preschool children who improved functioning to a
level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it)
divided by the (# of preschool children with IEPs
assessed)] times 100.
d. Percent of preschool children who improved functioning
to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of
preschool children who improved functioning to reach a
level comparable to same-aged peers) divided by the (#
of preschool children with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
e. Percent of preschool children who maintained functioning
at a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of
preschool children who maintained functioning at a level
comparable to same-aged peers) divided by the (# of
preschool children with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
If a + b + c + d + e does not sum to 100%, explain the difference.
PART B
Page 11 of 16
August 2007
SPP/APR Indicator Measurements & Data Sources
Monitoring Priority
Indicator
Measurement
Indicator B7 Continued
C. Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs:
FAPE in the LRE
Data Source(s)
SpEd RC
SECC,
Avatar
(contractor)
2006-07
a. Percent of preschool children who did not improve
functioning = [(# of preschool children who did not
improve functioning) divided by the (# of preschool
children with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
b. Percent of preschool children who improved functioning
but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning
comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of preschool
children who improved functioning but not sufficient to
move nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged
peers) divided by the (# of preschool children with IEPs
assessed)] times 100.
c.
Percent of preschool children who improved functioning
to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it
= [(# of preschool children who improved functioning to a
level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it)
divided by the (# of preschool children with IEPs
assessed)] times 100.
d. Percent of preschool children who improved functioning
to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of
preschool children who improved functioning to reach a
level comparable to same-aged peers) divided by the (#
of preschool children with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
e. Percent of preschool children who maintained functioning
at a level comparable to same-aged peers = [(# of
preschool children who maintained functioning at a level
comparable to same-aged peers) divided by the (# of
preschool children with IEPs assessed)] times 100.
If a + b + c + d + e does not sum to 100%, explain the difference.
Indicator B8:
Percent of parents with a child
receiving special education
services who report that schools
facilitated parent involvement as
a means of improving services
and results for children with
disabilities.
PART B
Percent = [(# of respondent parents who report schools facilitated
parent involvement as a means of improving services and results
for children with disabilities) divided by the (total # of respondent
parents of children with disabilities)] times 100.
Page 12 of 16
August 2007
SPP/APR Indicator Measurements & Data Sources
Monitoring Priority
Indicator
Measurement
Disproportionality
Indicator 9:
Percent of districts with
disproportionate representation
of racial and ethnic groups in
special education and related
services that is the result of
inappropriate identification.
Percent = [(# of districts with disproportionate representation of
racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services
that is the result of inappropriate identification) divided by the (# of
districts in the State)] times 100.
Data Source(s)
SpEd RC
SPR&I,
SECC, Fall
Membership
2006-07
SPR&I,
SECC, Fall
Membership
2006-07
Oregon defines disproportionate representation as race/ethnicity
distribution of students in special education that falls outside the
threshold defined by the state that cannot be justified by the unique
characteristics of the district. The threshold is defined as

The percentage of identified IDEA students by
race/ethnicity, which differs by +/- 20% from the
percentage of all students within the district in that
race/ethnicity area; and,

A validated risk ratio of >2.
Describe how the State determined that disproportionate
representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education
and related services was the result of inappropriate identification,
e.g., monitoring data, review of policies, practices and procedures
under 618(d), etc.
Indicator 10:
Percent of districts with
disproportionate representation
of racial and ethnic groups in
specific disability categories that
is the result of inappropriate
identification.
Percent = [(# of districts with disproportionate representation of
racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the
result of inappropriate identification) divided by the (# of districts
in the State)] times 100.
Oregon defines disproportionate representation as race/ethnicity
distribution of students in special education that falls outside the
threshold defined by the state that cannot be justified by the unique
characteristics of the district. The threshold is defined as

The percentage of identified IDEA students by
race/ethnicity, which differs by +/- 20% from the percentage
of all students within the district in that race/ethnicity area;
and,

A validated risk ratio of >2.
Describe how the State determined that disproportionate
representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories was the result of inappropriate identification, e.g.,
monitoring data, review of policies, practices and procedures
under 618(d), etc.
PART B
Page 13 of 16
August 2007
SPP/APR Indicator Measurements & Data Sources
Monitoring Priority
Indicator
Measurement
Effective General
Supervision Part B
/ Child Find
Indicator B11:
a. # of children for whom parental consent to evaluate was
received.
Percent of children with parental
consent to evaluate, who were
evaluated within 60 days (or
State established timeline).
Data Source(s)
SpEd RC
Child Find
(Indicator
11)
collection
2006-07
SPR&I PCR
Data
2006-07
SPR&I PCR
Data
2006-07
b. # determined not eligible whose evaluations were completed
within 60 days (or State established timeline).
c.
# determined eligible whose evaluations were completed
within 60 days (or State established timeline).
Account for children included in a, but not included in b or c.
Indicate the range of days beyond the timeline when the
evaluation was completed and any reasons for the delays.
Percent = [(b + c) divided by (a)] times 100.
Indicator B12:
Percent of children referred by
Part C prior to age 3, who are
found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and
implemented by their third
birthdays.
a. # of children who have been served in Part C and referred to
Part B for eligibility determination.
b. # of those referred determined to be NOT eligible and whose
eligibilities were determined prior to their third birthdays.
c.
# of those found eligible who have an IEP developed and
implemented by their third birthdays.
d. # of children for whom parent refusal to provide consent
caused delays in evaluation or initial services.
Account for children included in a, but not included in b, c or d.
Indicate the range of days beyond the third birthday when
eligibility was determined and the IEP developed and the reasons
for the delays.
Percent = [(c) divided by (a – b – d)] times 100.
Indicator B13:
Percent of youth aged 16 and
above with an IEP that includes
coordinated, measurable,
annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably
enable the student to meet the
post-secondary goals.
PART B
Percent = [(# of youth with disabilities aged 16 and above with an
IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and
transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet
the post-secondary goals) divided by the (# of youth with an IEP
age 16 and above)] times 100.
Page 14 of 16
August 2007
SPP/APR Indicator Measurements & Data Sources
Monitoring Priority
Indicator
Measurement
Data Source(s)
SpEd RC
Indicator B14:
Percent = [(# of youth who had IEPs, are no longer in secondary
school and who have been competitively employed, enrolled in
some type of postsecondary school, or both, within one year of
leaving high school) divided by the (# of youth assessed who had
IEPs and are no longer in secondary school)] times 100.
SpEd Exit,
SECC, High
School
Completer,
Early
Leaver, Post
School
Outcomes
Data
Collection
2008-09
SPR&I PCR
Data,
Dispute
Resolution
Database
No
Dispute
Resolution
Database
No
Dispute
Resolution
Database
No
Percent of youth who had IEPs,
are no longer in secondary
school and who have been
competitively employed,
enrolled in some type of
postsecondary school, or both,
within one year of leaving high
school.
Effective General
Supervision Part
B/General
Supervision
Indicator B15:
General supervision system
(including monitoring,
complaints, hearings, etc.)
identifies and corrects
noncompliance as soon as
possible but in no case later
than one year from
identification.
Indicator B16:
Percent of noncompliance corrected within one year of
identification:
# of findings of noncompliance
# of corrections completed as soon as possible but in no case
later than one year from identification.
Percent = [(b) divided by (a)] times 100.
For any noncompliance not corrected within one year of
identification, describe what actions, including technical
assistance and enforcement actions that the State has taken.
Percent = [(1.1(b) + 1.1(c)) divided by 1.1] times 100.
Percent of signed written
complaints with reports issued
that were resolved within 60-day
timeline or a timeline extended
for exceptional circumstances
with respect to a particular
complaint.
Indicator B17:
Percent = [(3.2(a) + 3.2(b)) divided by 3.2] times 100.
Percent of fully adjudicated due
process hearing requests that
were fully adjudicated within the
45-day timeline or a timeline
that is properly extended by the
hearing officer at the request of
either party.
PART B
Page 15 of 16
August 2007
SPP/APR Indicator Measurements & Data Sources
Monitoring Priority
Indicator
Measurement
Effective General
Supervision Part
B/General
Supervision
Indicator B18:
Percent = (3.1(a) divided by 3.1) times 100.
Percent of hearing requests that
went to resolution sessions that
were resolved through
resolution session settlement
agreements.
Indicator B19:
State reported data (618 and
State Performance Plan and
Annual Performance Report)
are timely and accurate.
SpEd RC
Dispute
Resolution
Database
No
Dispute
Resolution
Database
No
All Data
Sources
No
Percent = [(2.1(a)(i) + 2.1(b)(i)) divided by 2.1] times 100.
Percent of mediations held that
resulted in mediation
agreements.
Indicator B20:
Data Source(s)
State reported data, including 618 data and annual performance
reports are:
Submitted on or before due dates (February 1 for child count,
including race and ethnicity, placement; November 1 for exiting,
discipline, personnel; and February 1 for Annual Performance
Reports); and
Accurate (describe mechanisms for ensuring error free,
consistent, valid and reliable data and evidence that that these
standards are met).
PART B
Page 16 of 16
August 2007