JOURNAL OF INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND RESEARCH IN CIVIL ENGINEERING RECENT STUDIES ON PILED-RAFT FOUNDATION: STATE OF ART 1V.J.SHARMA, 2 1, 2, 3 Applied S.A.VASANVALA, 3C.H.SOLANKI Mechanics Department, Sardar Vallabhai National Institute of Technology, Ichchhanath, Surat-7, Gujarat,India. nitk.vijay@gmail.com ABSTRACT : Due to increase of civilization in recent decades the demand of land for construction purpose has increased exponentially. As most of the time site available consists of weak subsoil conditions, piled raft foundation has been preferred on large scale due its efficiency of carrying high vertical loads within the permissible settlement limits and cost effectiveness compared to pile foundation system. This paper presents the brief review of various studies on piled-raft foundation in last decade. The paper also reveals latest modification done in conventional piled-raft as per site conditions and loading criteria. Keywords: Differential Settlement, Total Settlement, Finite Element Method, Non-Identical Piles, Composite Piled-Raft, Viscohypoplastic 1. INTRODUCTION In traditional foundation design, it was customary to consider first the use of shallow foundation such as a raft (possibly after some ground-improvement methodology performed). If it was not adequate, deep foundation such as a fully piled foundation was used instead. In the former, it was assumed that load of superstructure was transmitted to the underlying ground directly by the raft. In the latter, the entire design loads were assumed to be carried by the piles [24].In recent decades, another alternative intermediate between shallow and deep foundation, what is called piled raft foundation or settlement reducing piles foundation, has been recognized by civil engineers. The piled raft concept has been used extensively in Europe and Asia. In this concept, piles are provided to control settlement rather than carry the entire load. Piled raft foundation has been proved to be an economical way to improve the serviceability of foundation performance by reducing settlement to acceptable levels. The favorable application of piled raft occurs when the raft has adequate loading capacities, but the settlement or differential settlement exceed allowable values. Conversely, the unfavorable situations for piled raft include soil profiles containing soft clays near the surface, soft compressible layers at relatively shallow depths and some others [24]. In the unfavorable cases, the raft might not be able to provide significant loading capacity, or long-term settlement of the compressible underlying layers might reduce the contribution of raft to the long-term stiffness of foundation. As we know piled-raft foundation system is applied in weak subsoil conditions where chances of foundation settlement play vital and major role in design of foundation system. This paper presents review of various studies carried out on piled-raft foundation in clayey soil, sandy soil and weathered rocks. Various researchers have worked on piled–raft foundation system in clayey soil. Their work includes study related to bearing behavior, composite system, non-linear FEM analysis, piled-raft system with nonidentical piles, etc. The Studies related to sandy soil includes separate analysis of pile and raft, case studies and use of FEM codes. Few works has been carried out on weathered rock which includes paper [3,7,10,and 25].Researcher [7] has carried out work in sand as well as weathered rock. 2 .REVIEW The review includes various papers published in various journals such as American society of civil engineering, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering ,Proceedings of ICE , etc .They have been grouped into major areas as: 1. Study of pile raft system in clay 2. Study of pile raft system in sand and weathered rock 2.1 Study of pile raft system in clay : In situations where a raft foundation alone does not satisfy the design requirements, it may be possible to enhance the performance of the raft by the addition of piles. The use of a limited number of piles, strategically located, may improve both the ultimate load capacity and the settlement and differential settlement performance of the raft. The study on design of piled-raft system in clayey soils have been carried by [25, 15, 32, 31, 27, 28 19, 22 and 12].The design of piled raft system involves basically bearing capacity of supporting subsoil and permissible allowable total and differential settlements. Poulos H.G. [25] had given outline of simplified method of ISSN: 0975 – 6744| NOV 10 TO OCT 11 | Volume 1, Issue 2 Page 38 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND RESEARCH IN CIVIL ENGINEERING carrying out a preliminary feasibility study and design of a piled raft system. The analysis is programmed via a spreadsheet program or a mathematical program such a MATHCAD. The approach gives a reasonable estimate of the order of the magnitude of settlement and differential settlement of foundation when applied to case study of piled raft on stiff clay and series of centrifuge tests on reconstituted soil. Liew S. S etal [15] have designed and presented instrumentation results of reinforcement concrete piled raft supporting 2500Ton oil storage tanks on a very soft alluvial clayey soil of about 40m thick in Riau Province of Sumatra, Indonesia. The design concept has been validated with the results of instrumentation Seo Y.K etal [32] have proposed design charts of piled raft foundations on soft clay. The design charts were first presented for the evaluation of both bearing capacity and total settlement in the raft alone foundation system. Load settlement relationship curves are used to evaluate the ultimate soil bearing capacity. The total settlement is evaluated by applying various traditional safety factors of the uniformly distributed loads. Then, the parametric studies were carried out for the piled raft foundation system. In the numerical analyses, elastoplastic finite elements models are used to present the foundation response and the design charts, which enable the determination of the raft size and pile length and spacing of piles. Sanctis L.D etal. [31] has proposed a simple design criterion to evaluate the ultimate vertical load of a piled raft as a function of its component capacities, which can be simply evaluated by the conventional bearing capacity theories. A broad parametric study is carried out using 3D FEM analysis to define the failure load coefficients accounting for the interaction between the raft and the pile group at failure. Also a guideline has been given to assess the factor of safety of vertically loaded piled raft. As per Meisam Rabiebi [27] the maximum bending moment in raft increases with increase raft thickness, decrease pile number and decrease in pile length. Central and differential settlement decreases with increase raft thickness and uniform increase in pile length. Further Meisam Rabiei [28] used a computer program ELPLA and found that pile configuration and load distribution are very important and effective in piled raft settlement , maximum moment and pile bearing factor. Three basic pile configurations and three load distribution types were considered. Pile configuration 1 has the pile uniformly distributed under whole raft area. Pile configuration 2 has piles under central area of the raft as well as under the edge of the raft. In pile configuration 3 the piles are placed only in the central area of the raft, the detail is shown in fig.1 . Novak L.J etal [19] carried out analysis of pile-raft foundations with 3D finite-element method .They found following reasons for use of the 3D Finite . Element Method (FEM): (1) the problem is so complex that simplified methods cannot model the problem correctly; and (2) codes for the FEM are available, powerful, and capable of being run on the personal computer. Comparisons were made between experimental and analytical results for two piled –raft foundations resting on stiff clay and the FEM has shown to yield excellent results for the cases analyzed .Oh E.Y.N etal. [22] have carried out numerical analysis of un-piled raft and piled raft on two different soil conditions. The analysis was carried out in two case studies with three typical load intensities of serviceability load. The subsoil was modeled as linear elastic materials, raft as beam element and piles as element with shear and normal coupling springs. For case study 1 with sandy soil condition maximum settlement of piled raft depends on piles spacing and number of piles. For case study 2 with clayey subsoil, the settlement of un-piled raft was similar for different raft thickness .Raft thickness was found to have obvious effect on differential settlement. The settlement of piled raft at piled area showed a bowl shape settlement pattern and edge of the raft strip showed a downward deviation from the settlement bowl. Lee J H.etal [12] has conducted series of 3D elasto-plastic finite element analyses to investigate the bearing behavior of a square piled raft subjected to vertical loading. In this study, the main characteristic of these analyses was to permit soil slip at the pile–soil interface. Pile positions, pile number, pile length and loading distributions on the raft were varied, and the effects of pile–soil slip, pile geometries and loading types were examined. Furthermore, the proportion of load sharing of the raft and piles at the ultimate state and the relationship between the settlement and overall factor of safety was evaluated. The results show that the use of a limited number of piles, strategically located, might improve both bearing capacity and the settlement performance of the raft. The work related to piledraft foundation resting on over-consolidated clay was carried out by [8, 29, 30], which includes numerical study of piled-raft foundation behavior and comparison with field measured results. Reul O.etal [30] carried out comparisons of in-situ measurements and numerical analyses for three piled raft foundations on over-consolidated clay between overall settlement , differential settlement and load carried by piles by back analysis. Three main performance indicators of the piled raft were proposed: the proportion of load carried by the piles,and the maximum settlement and maximum differential settlement, both as a proportion of the corresponding quantity for an unpiled raft foundation. The last indicator suggests that improved layout of the pile support can lead to a reduction both in the maximum differential settlement and in the overall quantity of piles. ISSN: 0975 – 6744| NOV 10 TO OCT 11 | Volume 1, Issue 2 Page 39 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND RESEARCH IN CIVIL ENGINEERING Figure 1. Model configuration and properties used in the analysis Garcia F etal [8] had applied viscohypo plastic model to the case history of piled raft foundation- Messeturm tower in Frankfurt Germany with 3D FEM analysis with ABAQUS and the user subroutine UMAT developed by A. Niemunis and the geotechnical group of the Karlsruhe university in Germany. The calculated results are compared with the in situ measurements with the purpose to verify the viscohypoplastic law in a boundary value problem. It was found that viscohypoplastic model can predict with good level of agreement the behavior of a piled raft foundation. Reul O. [29] has carried out numerical study of bearing behavior of piled rafts in overconsolidated clay. It is shown that the interaction between piles and rafts is a major influence on bearing capacity of piled-raft foundation. To mobilize shallow soil in coastal areas to participate in the interaction of piled raft foundation sufficiently, the researchers extended the concept of piled raft to a new type of foundation named composite piled raft. In the system of composite piled raft, the short piles made of flexible materials were used to strengthen the shallow soft soil, while the long piles made of relatively rigid materials were used to reduce the settlements and the cushion beneath the raft was used to redistribute and adjust the stress ratio of piles to subsoil. Researchers [13, 41, 14, 40] had carried out rigorous analysis on CPRF system .Liang F.Y. etal [13] have carried out numerical analysis of composite piled raft with cushion subjected to vertical load. Influencing factors such as ratio of length to diameter and elastic moduli of piles as well as thickness and elastic modulus of cushion were studied in details. Load-sharing ratios of piles and subsoil as well as foundation settlement were also investigated. Zheng J.J. etal [41] carried out 3D non-linear finite element modeling of composite foundation formed by Cement-Flyash-Gravel-lime piles which is a widely used ground improvement technique. A CFG–lime multi-pile composite foundation is a new concept utilizing CFG and lime piles as shown in fig 2. The parameters studied include the length and diameter of piles and the thickness of the cushion. The stress distribution beneath the composite foundation, the influence of the cushion on load-settlement behavior, and the ratio of stresses in the piles to those in the subsoil are also studied. The results show that settlement is much more significantly affected by the length and diameter of the CFG pile rather than that of the lime pile, thus CFG pile acts as a settlement- ISSN: 0975 – 6744| NOV 10 TO OCT 11 | Volume 1, Issue 2 Page 40 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND RESEARCH IN CIVIL ENGINEERING reducing pile. On the other hand, the load distribution between piles and subsoil is significantly affected by the cushion thickness. Optimization of composite piled raft foundation with varied rigidity of cushion was carried out by Liang F.etal [14 ].The analysis model of piled raft foundation was set up using the fictitious pile method , and Fredholm’s integral equations of the second kind were deduced to solve the problems .By simulating the cushion with wrinkle springs , the effect of cushion was taken into consideration. The method is suitable to analyze the foundation under working loads and could be applied to solve problems of different rigidities of piles and cushion. ZHAO M.H.etal [40 ] have carried out settlement calculation for long –short composite piled raft foundation.Based on the shear deformation method,the Mylonakis and gazetas model was introduced . Considering the effects of cushion , the flexible factors of interaction were provided.Then the settlement calculation for long-short composite piled raft foundation was developed. The non-linear analyses of piled-raft foundation have been interesting area of study for many researchers which include [16, 17, 37, 33, and 4].Maharaj D.K etal [16] worked on non-linear finite element analysis of piled –raft foundation resting on clay soil layers .. In this study the raft and piles are assumed to be linearly elastic and Drucker-Prager criterion has been used to represent soil as elasto-plastic material.Based on threedimensional non-linear finite element analysis, it was found that the addition of even a small number of piles increases the load-carrying capacity of a raft foundation. The axial load distribution shows that the piles reach their ultimate capacity earlier than the raft. Maharaj D.K. [17 ] continued his work in non-linear finite element analysis of piled raft foundation under the application of uniformly distributed load .Fig 3 shown below gives finite element discretization and boundary conditions applied to pile raft foundation. Load settlement curves of raft and piled raft foundation have been provided for different raft and pile stiffness. Vásquez L.G etal [37] had carried out non-linear three-dimensional finite element analysis to estimate capacity of piled raft. Figure 2. Sketch of CFG –lime pile composite foundation Figure 3. Finite element discretization for piledraft A windows based general-purpose finite element program (AMPS) was used to carry out the analyses.A suitable nonlinear model is used to model the soil behavior ,and contact interfaces are included to study the interaction between soil and piles and between soil and slab .Two piled-raft system were analyzed. It was found that the contribution of the pile tip in the resistance tends to increase as the deformation increases.Non-linear finite element analysis of piled-raft foundation resting on layers of soil having different stiffness have been done by [33,4,5]. Small J.C.etal [33] has developed a method of analysis for piled raft foundation where piles exhibits nonlinear load – deflection behavior. The raft is analysed by finite element methods, while the piles are treated as springs having a variable stiffness,so as to model any non-linear behaviour. The soil is treated as an elastic medium that may consist of layers of soil having different stiffnesses. The method has been incorporated into the computer program GARP (General Analysis of Rafts with Piles). This program is used to analyse a tall building that was constructed on a piled raft foundation, and a comparison is made of the calculated and observed behaviour. Chen J etal [4] has presented a nonlinear analysis method for simulating the interaction of superstructure –pile-raft-soil system in layered soil.The flexibility coefficients of the pile-pile and the pile-soil are deduced , the stiffness matrix of the pile-soil system is established, and interaction equation of superstructure –pile-raft –soil system is formulated. The distribution of the settlement of the foundation ,which was large in the middle and small in the boundary and like a dish, was consistent with the measured data in field. Further using nonlinear analysis method and program of the interaction of superstructure-pileraft-soil system in layered soil ,reaction force on pile head and displacement characteristic of raft of the piled raft foundation were analysed when the thickness of the raft, spacing of piles ,length and diameter of piles were changed. Recently it has been found that piled-rafts having non-identical piles shows efficient performance, researchers ISSN: 0975 – 6744| NOV 10 TO OCT 11 | Volume 1, Issue 2 Page 41 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND RESEARCH IN CIVIL ENGINEERING [36,5,35,6] had worked in the field of piled-raft with non-identical pile lengths.Tan Y.C etal [36] has given a design approach in which foundation of medium rise building is designed using skinfriction piles of different length with longer piles at the center and progressive shorter pile towards the edge.For detailed design of foundation two cases were considered.Case 1 considers overall settlement behavior of foundation system to predict settlement profile for structural design .Meanwhile case 2 considers interaction between the pile-soilstructure (foundation raft) of foundation system to determine load distribution and local settlement of piles and also structuraldesign of raft to complement case 1. The foundation system was monitored and the results obtained showed that foundation system adopted performed satisfactory. Chow H.S.W etal [ 5] have used finite layer method for the analysis of piled rafts with piles of different lengths and diameters. The soil is divided into horizontal layers with different material properties and only vertical loads may be applied to the raft. Interactions between raft-soil-pile are computed Comparisons of actual measurements and the results of finite element calculations have shown that the finite layer method can provide reasonably accurate solutions. It is very easy to prepare data for the finite layer analysis as only the pile locations and properties need to be specified, and the piles discretised into linear elements. This method is more efficient than the conventional three-dimensional finite element analysis. Tan Y.C etal [35] discussed methodology of a floating piled raft foundation system consisting of nonidentical piles with longer piles in central portion and progressively shorter piles towards edge for medium rise building (5-storey) on soft clay.Two major cases were considered for detail foundation analysis and design. Case 1 of pile-soil-structure interaction was taken in consideration to determine stress distribution, deformation and settlement of raft and piles. Case 2 considers overall settlement behavior of piled raft (immediate and consolidation settlement). Chow H.S.W [6] has done her Phd thesis on behavior of piled rafts supported by non-identical piles examined by use of computer program APRILS based on finite layer and finite element methods.The finite layer method is used for analysis of layered soil system. This method can be applied different shape of loadings and has shown good agreement with the theoretical solutions.The FEM is used for analysis of raft and piles. Full interaction between raft, piles and soil is considered in the analysis. 2.2 Study of pile raft system on sand and weathered rock:This section of the paper deals with piled –raft foundation system in sandy soil and weathered rock conditions. The researchers [2, 18, and 34] have studied effect of piles and raft in a piled-raft foundation system founded in sand separately and find out the behavior of piled-raft foundation as whole. Cao X.D etal [2 ] have carried out study on behavior of model rafts resting on disconnected piles which act as reinforcement in base soil (sand in this case ) rather than structural element . By varying factors such as raft stiffness, pile length, pile arrangement, and pile number, results of the investigation indicate that structurally disconnected piles are effective in reducing the settlement and bending moment in model rafts. Nemoto H.etal[18] have carried out series of experimental and analytical study on the behaviors of model pile groups and model piled rafts in dry sand subjected to static vertical load and static cyclic horizontal load to establish an adequate analytical method and seismic design method . An emphasis was placed on the influence of the connection condition between the pile head and raft on the behaviors of the model foundations .The test apparatus including model foundations , model ground , loading , measuring devices and test procedure were described in detail. Sonoda R.etal [34] has applied simple conservative design approach for design of foundation. As per design approach building and its foundation were constructed in sandy ground using a reverse construction method. The main difference between a reverse construction method and a conventional construction method is that the piles are cast in place and are partially loaded by the superstructure early during the construction process. It is only later that the raft (mat foundation) is constructed to combine with the piles to bear the full building load. To examine the validity of the design method, settlements of the foundation were observed during construction. The measured settlements were smaller than those predicted in the design stage, satisfying the design requirements for the building design. In recent years analysis of piled-raft foundation in sandy subsoils using finite element code has increased exponentially. The researchers [23,22, 20, 21, 1, 11, 42 and 9] had carried out extensive research in the same. They have used various finite element codes to incorporate the exact field conditions.Paranmoyes etal [ 23] have illustrated the process of design of a piled raft foundation for a large residential development using a three stage procedure, consisting of an initial assessment of the feasibility of the design, a middle stage of refining pile locations and depths, and a detailed design stage of assessing the behaviour of the foundation under various loading cases using GARP8 computer program. The utilization of a piled raft foundation versus a conventional piled only foundation delivered the required serviceability performance with regard to total and differential settlements while providing cost savings estimated to be of the order of 30% versus the original pileonly solution Oh E .Y. N.etal[20] have carried out ISSN: 0975 – 6744| NOV 10 TO OCT 11 | Volume 1, Issue 2 Page 42 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND RESEARCH IN CIVIL ENGINEERING parametric study on piled raft foundation in sand using numerical modeling with three typical load intensities of serviceability load. The maximum settlement of the piled rafts depends on the pile spacing and the number of piles; while the raft thickness does not have a significant effect. The increase in raft thickness reduces the differential settlement in the foundations. The raft-soil stiffness (Krs) is shown to influence the differential settlement and has the largest influence. Oh E .Y. N.etal[21] have studied analysis of unpiled and piled raft foundations with sandy soil conditions similar to those found in Surfers Paradise of Australia. For the unpiled raft, the normalized settlement parameter (IR) for the raft sizes of 8m×8m and 15m×15m ranged as 1.02-1.15, and 0.64-0.81 respectively. In the case of the piled raft with raft thicknesses of 0.25, 0.4,0.8, 1.5 and 3m, the corresponding maximum settlements are 64, 63.3, 62.6, 62.3 and 62.2 mm, and the bending moment values are 107, 160, 321, 446 and 485 kNm. The piles are 0.7m diameter and 16m length. Three values of intensity of loading as 215, 430 and 645kN/m2 were studied. Figure 4 illustrates the symmetric idealization of the piled raft problem. Baziar M.H etal [1] have investigated bearing settlement behavior of combined pile-raft foundations on medium dense sand Numerical simulation was also carried out on the model test, using FLAC-3D, to show compatibility of the numerical analysis with the test.Fig 5. Shows numerical model mesh for piled raft and its surround soil in simulation of 1g physical test. ` Figure 4: Finite element dealization of pile raft system Obtained results showed very good accuracy of the numerical method used in this study as long as the applied load does not exceed the working load, while the performance of numerical model was relatively good for the loads beyond working load. Justo J.L etal [11 ] have studied structure of a copper concentrate store founded on reinforced concrete raft supported by 697 piles. The piles are fitted on a dense sand layer , but there are clay layers of medium consistency along the shaft and below the support soil.Owing to this , the piles are subjected to negative skin friction , the raft has suffered important settlements , the structure has been damaged and the upper conveyor belt has experienced problems.A 3-D finite element (FE) calculation has permitted calculation of the displacements and stresses in the piles, raft and structure. A 3-D finite element (FE) calculation has permitted calculation of the displacement and stresses in piles, raft and structure. Figure 5: Numerical model of pile-raft Foundation under 1g physical test using FLAC-3D a) Total mesh b) pile raft mesh Ziaie-Moayed R.etal[42] have evaluated piled raft foundations behavior with different dimensions of piles.element program. They found that piled raft foundation with different pile diameters may be a good solution to reduce total and differential settlements if the bottom layer is dense soil but if bottom layer is soft soil then in that case piled raft system with different pile lengths can control differential and total settlements. Giretti.D [ 9] has done Phd work in Modelling of Piled raft foundations in sand. The main aim of thesis was to highlight the effects of the raft–soil–pile interactions on the resistance sand. Researchers [38,39 and 7] have carried out work on case studies comparing the values of design settlement with the measured values after execution of the projects.Yamashita K etal [38] have studied a case history of design and performance of piled raft supporting a 162 m high residential tower.Field measurements were performed on settlement and load sharing of a piled raft supporting a 162m high isolated residential tower from beginning of construction to eight month after the end of construction.At eight months after the end of construction, the measured settlement was 24mm and the ratios of the load carried by the piles to the effective load were estimated to be 0.88-0.94, which were consistent with the design values of the foundation settlement and load sharing between raft and piles. Yamashita.K etal [39] have studied a case history of seven-storey building of ISSN: 0975 – 6744| NOV 10 TO OCT 11 | Volume 1, Issue 2 Page 43 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND RESEARCH IN CIVIL ENGINEERING piled raft on loose sand underlain by soft silt layers .In order to reduce consolidation settlement of the soft silt and to cope with liquefiable loose sand, a piled raft combined with gird –form ground improvement was adopted. The design of the foundation was found appropriate by field measurements which concerned settlement ,axial forces of the piles and earth pressures and pore – water pressure beneath the raft from the beginning of construction to time about four years after the end of construction. ElMossoallamy Y. etal [7] have done general over view on recent innovative applications (case studies) of piled rafts in Germany on Frankfurt clay, Berlin sand and Marl and weathered rock for highway bridges .The piled raft foundation provides a new geotechnical concept not only for high rise buildings but also for residential buildings and bridges, which allow a high grade technical and economical optimization of construction. Any kind of eccentric construction can be safely founded on soft to stiff clay and also on loose to medium dense sand by appropriate location of piles ,staggering the pile length and suitable pile diameter .The number and length of piles, the pile load share ,total bearing capacity of piled raft and its settlement are main criteria that should be investigated during a feasibility study to check the validity of piled raft. Sometimes geological conditions at site consist of weathered rocks on which piled raft foundation has to be laid. Recently high rise buildings are founded on weathered rock especially in Middle east countries. This has lead to development of interest of group of researchers [3, 7, 26, and 10] in field of piled- raft foundation on weathered rocks. Chaudhary M.TA [ 3 ] have investigated application of a group of 1072 piles for controlling settlement of an important and sensitive structure founded on weak rock.2D axisymmetrical and 3D finite element models were employed to model the 9.0 m thick and 76 m diameter circular raft, underlying soil/rock and a mix of annular and orthogonal pile layout. Effectiveness of pile foundation in reducing settlement was assessed by comparing the results with the case of raft foundation alone. Poulos H.G etal [26] have outlined the processes followed in the design of the foundations for the Burj Dubai and the independent verification of the design. The maximum settlement predicted by ABAQUS for the tower and podium foundation compares reasonably well with the maximum settlement estimated by the revised PIGS analysis carried out during the independent verification process. Ibrahim K.etal [10] have carried out piled raft foundation design analysis of Pentominium tower in Dubai,UAE in local carbonate soils and rock. Geotechnical investigations were outlined along with effect of proposed tower on neighboring structures, single-pile response and impact of cyclic degradation were assessed. Numerical analyses was used to evaluate the overall piled raft response under various static and wind loading combination as well as some techniques were used to optimize the foundation design, including preliminary pile testing. 3. CONCLUSIONS Following conclusions can be drawn from the various research studies: Piled-raft foundation can be successively applied in weak sub-soil conditions i.e. clayey, sandy and weathered rock .Piled –raft foundation proves to be cost effective compared to other type of foundation systems Finite element method is most efficient method to analyze complex nature of piled-raft foundation behavior in clay, sand and weathered rock. The composite piled-raft, piled-raft with nonidentical piles, etc are the latest modification in conventional piled-raft system and found to be efficient with respect to geological and loading 4. REFERENCES [1] M.H Baziar, A Ghorbani, R Katzenbach. Small-Scale Model Test and Three-Dimensional Analysis of Pile-Raft Foundation on MediumDense Sand. International Journal of Civil Engineering. Vol. 7, No. 3, pp 170-175, 2009. [2] X D Cao, H. Wang and M F Chang .Behavior of Model Rafts Resting on PileReinforced Sand, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering Vol. 130, No. 2, pp. 129-138, 2004. [3] M .TA Chaudhary. FEM modeling of a large piled raft for settlement control in weak rock Engineering Structures 29, 2901–2907, 2007. [4] J Chen, Y Chang and Y Zou. Key engineering Materials (Volumes 400 402):Advances in Concrete and Structures, pp. 651658 [5] H.S.W Chow and J.C Small. Behavior of Piled Rafts with Piles of Different Lengths and Diameters under Vertical Loading. Advances in Deep Foundations (GSP 132), 2005. [6] H.S.W Chow. Analysis of piled-raft foundation with piles of different length and diameter ,Phd Thesis, 2007. [7] Y.El-Mossoallamy, B.Lutz and T.Richter. Innovative application of piled raft foundation to optimize the design of high-rise buildings and bridge foundations,10th International Conference on piling and deep foundations, Amsterdam 2006. [8] F.Garcia,A.Lizcano, and O.Reul Viscohypoplastic Model Applied to the Case History of Piled Raft Foundation. Geotechnical Engineering in the information Technology Age, Atlanta,GA 1-6,(2006). [9] D. Giretti .Modelling of piled raft foundations in sand ,Phd thesis (2009) [10] K .Ibrahim, G Bunce and C.Murrels.Foundation design for the Pentominium ISSN: 0975 – 6744| NOV 10 TO OCT 11 | Volume 1, Issue 2 Page 44 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND RESEARCH IN CIVIL ENGINEERING tower in Dubai,UAE,Proceedings of ICE , Civil Engineering 162, pp 25–33, 2009. [11] J.L Justo, A .Jaramillo, M .Vazquez, E .Justo and M.T. Perez .The performance of piled raft foundations, Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ICSMGE 2009): 12281231. [12] J Lee, Y .Kim, J .Sangseom Threedimensional analysis of bearing behavior of piled raft on soft clay. Computers and GeotechnicsVolume 37 Issue 1-2, pp. 103-114 ,2010, [13] F.Y. Liang, L.Z. Chen, X.G. Shi. Numerical analysis of composite piled raft with cushion subjected to vertical load. Computers and Geotechnics 30 (2003) 443–453 [14] F. Liang, J Li and L. Chen .Optimization of Composite Piled Raft Foundation with Varied Rigidity of Cushion. Proceedings of Sessions of GeoShanghai 2006 .Foundation Analysis and Design –Innovative methods (GSP 153) 29-34. [15] S.S Liew, S.S Gue and Y.C Tan Gue & Partners Sdn Bhd, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.“Design and Instrumentation Results of A Reinforcement Concrete Piled Raft Supporting 2500 Ton Oil Storage Tank On Very Soft Alluvium Deposits”, Ninth International Conference on Piling and Deep Foundations, Nice, 3rd – 5th June, 2002. [16] D.K Maharaj and S.R Gandhi .Non-linear Finite element analysis of piledraft foundations.Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Geotechnical Engineering 157, 2004 Issue GE3 Pages 107–113. [17] D.K. Maharaj. Three DimensionalNonlinear Finite Element Analysis to Study the Effect of Raft and Pile Stiffness on the Load-Settlement Behaviour of Piled Raft Foundations.Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering ,Volume 9 , Bundle A ,(2004). [18] H. Nemoto Yaegashi K, Takeuchi Y,Nishimura N,Matsmoto T and Kitiyodom P. vertical load tests of model piled rafts withdifferent pile head connection conditions,Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Physical Modelling in : Geotechniques, Hongkong 2006 pp 853-859 . [19] J Novak, L.C. Reese, and S.T.Wang. Analysis of Pile-Raft Foundations with 3D FiniteElement Method. Proceedings of the 2005 Structures congress and 2005 Forensic Engineering Symposium,New York. [20] E.Y.N Oh , Q.M Bui , C. Surarak, R .Adamec and A.S. Balasurbamaniam Parametric Study on Piled Raft Foundation in Sand Using Numerical Modeling ,www.griffith.edu.au [21] E.Y. N Oh, M. Huang, C Surarak, R. Adamec and A.S. Balsurbamaniam. Finite element modeling for piled raft foundation in sand. Eleventh East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering &Construction (EASEC-11). “Building a Sustainable Environment” November 19-21, 2008, Taipei, Taiwan. [22] E.Y.N Oh, D.G Lin., Q.M Bui. , M. Huang, C.Surarak andA.S. Balasubramaniam Numerical analysis of piled raft foundation in sandy and clayey soils.Proceedings of the 17th International conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ICSMGE 2009): 11591162 [23] Paranmoyes , H.G. Poulos , J.C. Small and F. Badelow . Piled raft design process for a high-rise building on the gold coast, Australia. TALL BUILDINGS from Engineering to Sustainability: 6th International Conference on Tall Buildings, Mini Symposium on Sustainable Cities, Mini Symposium on Planning, Designand SocioEconomic Aspects of Tall Residential Living Environment,Hongkong , pp241-249.China 2005. [24] H. G Poulos,. Piled raft foundations: design and applications, Geotechnique 51(2001), No. 2, 95- 113 [25] H.G Poulos Simplified design procedure for piled raft foundation .Deep Foundation 2002:441-458. [26] H.G Poulos and G.Bunce. Foundation design for the burj dubai – the world’s tallest building. Proceedings of the 6th International conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical engineering, Arlington, VA, 2008 [27] M. Rabiebi.Parametric Study for Piled Raft Foundations ,Electronic journal of Geotechnical Engineering Volume 14 ,Bundle A ,2009. [28] M. Rabiebi .Effect of Pile Configuration and Load Type on Piled Raft. Proceedings of Sessions of Geoshanghai 2010 : Deep Foundations and Geotechnical Insitu testing Geotechnical special publication no. 205:34- 41 [29] O. Reul .Numerical Study of the Bearing Behavior of Piled Rafts . International Journal of Geomechanics, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2004, pp. 59- 68 [30] O. Reul and M.F Randolf . Piled rafts in overconsolidated clay: comparison of in situ measurements and numerical analyses, Geotechnique 53, No. 3, 301–315, (2003). [31] L.D Sanctis and Alessandro, A Mandolini Bearing Capacity of Piles Rafts on Soft Clay soils. Journal of Geotechnical and GeoenvironmentalEngineering, Vol. 132, No.12, 2006, pp. 1600-1610, [32] Y.K Seo, K.S Choi and S.G Jeong Proceedings of the 13th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference: Design Charts of Piled Raft Foundations on Soft Clay: Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, May 25–30,2003 [33] JC Small and HG Poulos.Non-linear Analysis of Piled Raft Foundations. Proceedings of Sessions of Geo-Denver: Contemporary Issues In Deep Foundations (GSP 158) 2007.pp 1-9 ISSN: 0975 – 6744| NOV 10 TO OCT 11 | Volume 1, Issue 2 Page 45 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND RESEARCH IN CIVIL ENGINEERING [34] R Sonoda, T Matsumoto, P Kitiyodom, H Moritaka, and T Ono. Case study of a piled raft foundation constructed using a reverse construction method and its post-analysis, Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 46(2): 142–159 (2009). [35] YC Tan, SW.Cheah and M R Taha Methodology for Design of Piled Raft for 5Storey Buildings on Very Soft Clay. Proceedings of Sessions of GeoShanghai 2006 Foundation Analysis and Design – Innovative Application (GSP153) 226-233 [36] Y.C Tan, C.M Chow and C.M Gue Gue & Partners Sdn Bhd, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia .Piled medium-rise buildings on very soft clay 2004. [37] L.G Vásquez, S.T Wang, and W.M Isenhower Estimation of the Capacity of Pile-Raft Foundations by Three- Dimensional Non-Linear finite Element Analysis Geo Congress 2006: Geotechnical Engineering in the information Technology Age (2006) 1-6 . [38] K.Yamashita,J.Hamada and Y.Soga. Settlement and Load Sharing of Piled Raft of a 162 m High Residential Tower. Proceedings of Sessions of Geoshanghai Deep Foundations and Geotechnical Insitu testing. Geotechnical special publication no. 205:26-33 [39] K.Yamashita and T. Yamada Settlement and load sharing of a piled raft with ground improvement on soft ground, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 2009: 1236-1239 [40] M.H Zhao, L. Zhang, M.H Yang. Settlement calculation for long-short composite piled raft foundation. Journal of Central South University of Technology, Volume 13 No.6 749754,(2006). [41] J.J Zheng, S.W Abusharar,and X.Z Wang. Three- dimensional nonlinear finite element modeling of composite foundation formed by CFG–lime piles. Computers and Geotechnics 35 (2008) 637–643 [42] R. Ziaie-Moayed, M. Kamalzare and M.Safavian .Evaluation of piled raft foundations behavior with different dimensions of piles. Journal of applied sciences 10(13):1320-1325,2010 ISSN: 0975 – 6744| NOV 10 TO OCT 11 | Volume 1, Issue 2 Page 46