Functional Ecology
Figure S1. Examples of distribution of abundance (3-D bar graphs) and spatial
association (color maps) of predator (P. persimilis) lines and their prey (T. urticae) in
3 x 8 plant arrays: (A) Unselected; (B) High Consumption; (C) High Conversion
Efficiency; (D) High Dispersal. These examples were from Experiment (block) 1 at
the low predator: prey ratio (1 predator to 30 prey). In the bar graphs, the
horizontal plane represents the spatial arrangement of the array and the vertical
axes present arthropod numbers. Abundance scales vary among dates and between
lines. The association maps represent a top-down view of the arrays. Prey were
started on plants in the lower left and right corners. Predators were released on the
prey-infested plant on the lower left. Sample dates progress from top to bottom.
Spatial association maps were computed and plotted by SADIE (Spatial Analysis by
Distance IndicEs) software (Perry, 1995; Perry et al., 1996). Red represents areas in
which predators and prey are spatially associated, white areas represent no spatial
association (random), and green represents negative spatial association; the darker
the red or green, the stronger the association (positive or negative, respectively).
Nachappa et al. Variation in predator foraging behavior changes predatorprey spatio-temporal dynamics
Functional Ecology
A)
Nachappa et al. Variation in predator foraging behavior changes predator-prey spatio-temporal dynamics
Functional Ecology
B)
Nachappa et al. Variation in predator foraging behavior changes predator-prey spatio-temporal dynamics
Functional Ecology
C)
Nachappa et al. Variation in predator foraging behavior changes predator-prey spatio-temporal dynamics
Functional Ecology
D)
Nachappa et al. Variation in predator foraging behavior changes predator-prey spatio-temporal dynamics