Bibliography
Aleven, V. (1998). Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples.
Dissertation Abstracts International 59,1-B (University Microfilms International No. 95014-108).
Black and Brown, Inc. v. Home for the Accepted, Inc., A.2d 722 (Pa Super 335 1972).
Blasi, G. L. (1995). What lawyers know: Lawyering, expertise, cognitive science, and the function
of theory. Journal of Legal Education, 45 (3), 313-397.
Burton, S. (1995). An introduction to law and legal reasoning. Boston MA: Little Brown.
Dewitz, P. (1996). Reading law: Three suggestions for legal education. University of Toledo Law
Review, 27, 657-673.
Dewitz, P. (1997). Legal education: A problem of learning from text. Review of Law and Social
Change, 23 (2), 225-247.
Dickerson, R. (1975). The interpretation and application of statutes. Toronto: Little, Brown.
Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Fajans, E., & Falk, M. (1993). Against the tyranny of paraphrase: Talking back to texts. Cornell
Law Review, 78, 163-205.
Farago, J. (1980). Intractable cases: the role of uncertainty in the concept of law. New York
University Law Review 55, 195-239.
Feltovich, P., Spiro, R., Coulson, R., & Myers-Kelson, A. (1995). The reductive bias and the
crisis of text in the law. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 6 (1), 187-212.
Hazard, G. (1982). Arguing the law: The advocate’s duty and opportunity. Georgia Law Review
16, 821-832.
Hofer, P. (1987). Cognitive strategies for interpreting law. Dissertation Abstracts International
48,5-B (University Microfilms International No. 87-16612).
Lawrence, J. (1988). Expertise on the bench: Modeling magistrate’s judicial decision making. In
M. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. Farr (Eds.) The nature of expertise. (pp. 229-259).Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Lawrence, J. (1991). Informal reasoning in the judicial system. In J. Voss, D. Perkins et. al. (Eds.)
Informal reasoning and education. (pp. 59-81). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Llewellyn, K. (1960). The common law tradition: Deciding appeals. Boston: Little, Brown.
Lundeberg, M. (1987). Metacognitive aspects of reading comprehension: Studying understanding
in legal case analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 22 (4), 407-432.
Marchant, G. & Robinson, J. (1999). Is knowing the tax code all it takes to be a tax expert ? On
the development of legal expertise. In R. Sternberg & J. Horvath (Eds.) Tacit knowledge in professional
practice: Researcher and practitioner perspectives. (pp. 3-20). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Martin, M. (1995). Skepticism about legal reasoning. Communication and Cognition 28, (1), 5576.
Meta v. Yellow Cab Company of Pennsylvania, A.2d 898 (Pa. Super. 294 1975).
Moore, M. (1981). The semantics of judging. Southern California Law Review ,54, (2) 151-294.
Oates, L. C. (1997). Beating the odds: Reading strategies of law students admitted through
alternative admissions programs. Iowa Law Review, 83 (1), 139-160.
Rideout, C. & Ramsfield, J. (1994). Legal writing: A revised view. Washington Law Review, 69,
35-99.
Rissland, E. (1991). Example-based reasoning. In In J. Voss, D. Perkins et. al. (Eds.) Informal
reasoning and education. (pp. 187-208). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rissland, E. & Skalak, D. (1991). CABARET: Rule interpretation in a hybrid architecture.
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34 (6), 839-887.
Stratman , J. (in press). When law students read cases: Exploring relationships
between professional legal reasoning roles and problem detection. Discourse Processes 34 (1).
Stratman , J. (1994). Investigating persuasive processes in legal discourse in real time: Cognitive
biases and rhetorical strategy in appeal court briefs. Discourse Processes, 17 (1), 1-57.
Stratman, J. (1990). The emergence of legal composition as a field of inquiry: Evaluating the
prospects. Review of Educational Research, 60 (2), 153-235.
Weinstein, I. (1998). Lawyering in the state of nature: Instinct and automaticity in legal problem
solving. Vermont Law Review 23 (1), 1-57.