Interpretation: Students will explain aspects or parts of a topic, issue, event, experience, or idea of importance in social studies. Interpretation Skills & Processes 1 Content Evidence & Support Minimal information is provided to support the topic. The presentation is not effective. Minimal conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. The subject is inadequately explained. Few, if any, relationships are identified or comparisons are made. No logical inferences are drawn. The conclusion, if provided, is unsubstantiated or illogical. The treatment of the subject yields a somewhat inadequate or partially accurate interpretation. Some information is provided to support the topic, but it is inadequate. The presentation is somewhat effective. Concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are seldom or never used. Little or no logic or language appropriate to the topic is evident. Few, if any, examples are used to illustrate the concepts presented. Conclusions, if offered, are largely illogical or inaccurate. Some conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. The subject is somewhat inadequately explained. Some relationships are identified or comparisons are made. Some logical inferences are drawn. The conclusion is partially substantiated. 3 Information may be irrelevant to the topic. Most information is inaccurate, noncredible, or unverifiable. The content and scope of information are inadequate for the topic. Sources of information are not communicated. Some information relevant to the task is employed. Some information is inaccurate, non-credible, or unverifiable. The content and scope of information are somewhat inadequate for the purpose. Sources of information may be inadequately communicated. The presentation is not appropriate for the purpose or topic. Ideas are poorly developed and disorganized. Errors in sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, or usage seriously interfere with the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. The presentation is somewhat appropriate for the purpose and topic. Ideas are partially developed but somewhat disorganized. Errors in sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, or usage may sometimes interfere with the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. The treatment of the subject yields an adequate and accurate interpretation. Adequate information is provided to support the topic. The presentation is effective. The subject is adequately explained. Adequate relationships are identified or comparisons are made. Logical inferences are drawn. The conclusion is logical and consistent with the evidence given. 4 Conceptual Understanding The treatment of the subject yields an implausible or inaccurate interpretation. 2 Communication & Presentation Information relevant to the topic is provided. Although minor inaccuracies may be present, most information is accurate, credible, and verifiable. The content and scope of information are adequate for the topic. Most sources of information are adequately communicated. The presentation is appropriate for the purpose and topic. Ideas are adequately developed and generally well organized. Errors in sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, or usage seldom interfere with the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. The treatment of the subject yields an accurate and insightful interpretation. Information to support the topic is carefully selected and skillfully utilized. The presentation is highly effective. The subject is thoroughly explained. Many relationships are identified or thorough comparisons are made. Logical inferences are drawn. The conclusion is logical and consistent with the evidence given, and is insightful. Information highly relevant to the topic is provided. Information is detailed, accurate, credible, and verifiable. The content and scope of information fully support the topic. Sources of information are fully and clearly communicated. The presentation is highly appropriate for the purpose and topic. Ideas are thoroughly developed and well organized. Sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, and usage enhance the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. Some concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are used. Some use of logic and language appropriate to the topic is evident. Some examples are used to illustrate the concepts presented. Conclusions may be somewhat illogical or inaccurate. Adequate conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. Concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are accurately used. Logic and language appropriate to the topic are evident. Examples are used to adequately illustrate the concepts presented. Conclusions are generally logical and accurate. Superior conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. Concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are skillfully applied. Logic and language appropriate to the topic are present throughout. Examples used enhance understanding of the concepts presented. Conclusions are logical and accurate, and may be insightful. 1 Issue Analysis: Students will examine and analyze an issue of importance in social studies. Issue Analysis Skills & Processes 1 2 Conceptual Understanding Minimal information is provided to support the topic. The presentation is not effective. Minimal conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. The statement of the issue and its significance is unclear. Few, if any, important components of the issue are identified. Interrelationships among components are not recognized. Different perspectives are not acknowledged. The conclusions, if provided, are illogical or inconsistent with the analysis. Some evidence of analysis is demonstrated. The statement of the issue and its significance is somewhat unclear. A few important components of the issue are identified and analyzed. Interrelationships among components are seldom analyzed. Different perspectives may not be acknowledged. The conclusions are somewhat illogical or based on inadequate analysis. Information may be irrelevant to the topic. Most information is inaccurate, non-credible, or unverifiable. The content and scope of information are inadequate for the topic. Sources of information are not communicated. Some information is provided to support the topic, but it is inadequate. Some information relevant to the task is employed. Some information is inaccurate, non-credible, or unverifiable. The content and scope of information are somewhat inadequate for the purpose. Sources of information may be inadequately communicated. The presentation is not appropriate for the purpose or topic. Ideas are poorly developed and disorganized. Errors in sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, or usage seriously interfere with the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. The presentation is somewhat effective. The presentation is somewhat appropriate for the purpose and topic. Ideas are partially developed but somewhat disorganized. Errors in sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, or usage may sometimes interfere with the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. Concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are seldom or never used. Little or no logic or language appropriate to the topic is evident. Few, if any, examples are used to illustrate the concepts presented. Conclusions, if offered, are largely illogical or inaccurate. Some conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. Some concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are used. Some use of logic and language appropriate to the topic is evident. Some examples are used to illustrate the concepts presented. Conclusions may be somewhat illogical or inaccurate. Adequate evidence of analysis is demonstrated. Adequate information is provided to support the topic. The presentation is effective. Adequate conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. 4 Communication & Presentation Little or no evidence of analysis is demonstrated. 3 Content Evidence & Support The statement of the issue and its significance is clear. Significant components of the issue are identified and analyzed. Some interrelationships among components may be analyzed. Different perspectives are acknowledged. The conclusions are logical and consistent with the analysis. Information relevant to the topic is provided. Although minor inaccuracies may be present, most information is accurate, credible, and verifiable. The content and scope of information are adequate for the topic. Most sources of information are adequately communicated. The presentation is appropriate for the purpose and topic. Ideas are adequately developed and generally well organized. Errors in sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, or usage seldom interfere with the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. Concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are accurately used. Logic and language appropriate to the topic are evident. Examples are used to adequately illustrate the concepts presented. Conclusions are generally logical and accurate. Evidence of thorough analysis is demonstrated. Information to support the topic is carefully selected and skillfully utilized. The presentation is highly effective. Superior conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. The statement of the issue and its significance is clear and thorough. Significant components of the issue are identified and thoroughly analyzed. Interrelationships among components are analyzed. Different perspectives are acknowledged and explained. The conclusions are logical and consistent with the analysis. Information highly relevant to the topic is provided. Information is detailed, accurate, credible, and verifiable. The content and scope of information fully support the topic. Sources of information are fully and clearly communicated. The presentation is highly appropriate for the purpose and topic. Ideas are thoroughly developed and well organized. Sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, and usage enhance the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. Concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are skillfully applied. Logic and language appropriate to the topic are present throughout. Examples used enhance understanding of the concepts presented. Conclusions are logical and accurate, and may be insightful. 2 Problem Solving: Students will state and attempt to solve a problem of importance in social studies. Problem Solving Skills & Processes 1 The presentation is not effective. Minimal conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. The problem solving strategy is somewhat evident but inadequate. Some information is provided to support the topic, but it is inadequate. The presentation is not appropriate for the purpose or topic. Ideas are poorly developed and disorganized. Errors in sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, or usage seriously interfere with the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. The presentation is somewhat effective. The problem and its context may be unclear. Few, if any, important criteria relevant to the problem’s solution are identified. Alternative solutions to the problem are not proposed. A solution may be offered, but it is based on inadequate consideration of the criteria. The problem and its context are inadequately described. Some important criteria relevant to the problem’s solution are identified. Alternative solutions to the problem may be proposed, but are not evaluated. A solution will be offered, but it is based on inadequate consideration of the criteria. Information may be irrelevant to the topic. Most information is inaccurate, non-credible, or unverifiable. The content and scope of information are inadequate for the topic. Sources of information are not communicated. Some information relevant to the task is employed. Some information is inaccurate, non-credible, or unverifiable. The content and scope of information are somewhat inadequate for the purpose. Sources of information may be inadequately communicated. The presentation is somewhat appropriate for the purpose and topic. Ideas are partially developed but somewhat disorganized. Errors in sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, or usage may sometimes interfere with the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. Concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are seldom or never used. Little or no logic or language appropriate to the topic is evident. Few, if any, examples are used to illustrate the concepts presented. Conclusions, if offered, are largely illogical or inaccurate. Some conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. Some concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are used. Some use of logic and language appropriate to the topic is evident. Some examples are used to illustrate the concepts presented. Conclusions may be somewhat illogical or inaccurate. The problem solving strategy is evident and appropriate. Adequate information is provided to support the topic. The presentation is effective. Adequate conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. 4 Conceptual Understanding Minimal information is provided to support the topic. 3 Communication & Presentation The problem solving strategy is not evident. 2 Content Evidence & Support The problem is stated and its context is described. Important criteria relevant to the problem’s solution are identified. Alternative solutions to the problem are proposed and evaluated. A reasonable solution consistent with the criteria is offered. Information relevant to the topic is provided. Although minor inaccuracies may be present, most information is accurate, credible, and verifiable. The content and scope of information are adequate for the topic. Most sources of information are adequately communicated. The presentation is appropriate for the purpose and topic. Ideas are adequately developed and generally well organized. Errors in sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, or usage seldom interfere with the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. Concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are accurately used. Logic and language appropriate to the topic are evident. Examples are used to adequately illustrate the concepts presented. Conclusions are generally logical and accurate. The problem solving strategy is clearly evident and very effective. Information to support the topic is carefully selected and skillfully utilized. The presentation is highly effective. Superior conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. The problem is clearly defined and its context well described. Important criteria relevant to the problem’s solution are clearly identified and evaluated. Alternative solutions to the problem are proposed and thoroughly evaluated. A reasonable solution consistent with the criteria is offered. Information highly relevant to the topic is provided. Information is detailed, accurate, credible, and verifiable. The content and scope of information fully support the topic. Sources of information are fully and clearly communicated. The presentation is highly appropriate for the purpose and topic. Ideas are thoroughly developed and well organized. Sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, and usage enhance the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. Concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are skillfully applied. Logic and language appropriate to the topic are present throughout. Examples used enhance understanding of the concepts presented. Conclusions are logical and accurate, and may be insightful. 3 Reasoned Persuasion: Students will state a position on an issue or subject of importance in social studies, and use logic to defend it. Reasoned Persuasion Skills & Processes 1 Content Evidence & Support Communication & Presentation A pattern of deductive or inductive reasoning supporting the persuasive effort is not evident. Minimal information is provided to support the topic. The presentation is not effective. Minimal conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. The presentation is not appropriate for the purpose or topic. Ideas are poorly developed and disorganized. Errors in sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, or usage seriously interfere with the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. The presentation is somewhat effective. Some information relevant to the task is employed. Some information is inaccurate, non-credible, or unverifiable. The content and scope of information are somewhat inadequate for the purpose. Sources of information may be inadequately communicated. Adequate information is provided to support the topic. The presentation is somewhat appropriate for the purpose and topic. Ideas are partially developed but somewhat disorganized. Errors in sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, or usage may sometimes interfere with the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. The presentation is effective. Information relevant to the topic is provided. Although minor inaccuracies may be present, most information is accurate, credible, and verifiable. The content and scope of information are adequate for the topic. Most sources of information are adequately communicated. Information to support the topic is carefully selected and skillfully utilized. The presentation is highly effective. Superior conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. The position is not evident, or is unreasonable or unsubstantiated. Most points are not logically supported. 2 A pattern of deductive or inductive reasoning supporting the persuasive effort is somewhat evident. Some information is provided to support the topic, but it is inadequate. 3 The position may not be clear, or is somewhat unreasonable or unsubstantiated. Some points are logically supported. A pattern of deductive or inductive reasoning supporting the persuasive effort is evident. 4 Information may be irrelevant to the topic. Most information is inaccurate, non-credible, or unverifiable. The content and scope of information are inadequate for the topic. Sources of information are not communicated. The position is clear and substantiated. Most points are logically supported. A clear pattern of deductive or inductive reasoning enhancing the persuasive effort is evident. The position is clear and well substantiated. All points are logically supported. Information highly relevant to the topic is provided. Information is detailed, accurate, credible, and verifiable. The content and scope of information fully support the topic. Sources of information are fully and clearly communicated. The presentation is appropriate for the purpose and topic. Ideas are adequately developed and generally well organized. Errors in sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, or usage seldom interfere with the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. The presentation is highly appropriate for the purpose and topic. Ideas are thoroughly developed and well organized. Sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, and usage enhance the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. Conceptual Understanding Concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are seldom or never used. Little or no logic or language appropriate to the topic is evident. Few, if any, examples are used to illustrate the concepts presented. Conclusions, if offered, are largely illogical or inaccurate. Some conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. Some concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are used. Some use of logic and language appropriate to the topic is evident. Some examples are used to illustrate the concepts presented. Conclusions may be somewhat illogical or inaccurate. Adequate conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. Concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are accurately used. Logic and language appropriate to the topic are evident. Examples are used to adequately illustrate the concepts presented. Conclusions are generally logical and accurate. Concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are skillfully applied. Logic and language appropriate to the topic are present throughout. Examples used enhance understanding of the concepts presented. Conclusions are logical and accurate, and may be insightful. 4 Research/Investigation: Students will investigate a subject, issue, event, or experience of importance in social studies. Students will conduct research using relevant and appropriate resources, cite those sources, and effectively present their findings. Research/Investigation Skills & Processes 1 2 3 4 Content Evidence & Support Communication & Presentation Conceptual Understanding The research or investigation process, if evident, is ineffective. Minimal information is provided to support the topic. The presentation is not effective. Minimal conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. The statement of the research topic or purpose is not evident, or is unclear. Sources of information are inadequate or non-credible. Little information relevant to the topic is provided to support the research or investigative effort. Analysis is not evident, or is ineffective. The conclusions, if provided, are inadequate or inconsistent with the analysis. Sources utilized may not be documented. The research or investigative process is somewhat ineffective. Some supporting evidence is provided to support the topic, but it is inadequate. The presentation is somewhat effective. Some conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. The statement of the research topic or purpose is somewhat vague, and the significance of the topic unclear. Sources of information are somewhat inadequate or non-credible. Some information relevant to the topic is provided to support the research or investigative effort. Incomplete analysis is evident. The conclusions are somewhat inadequate or inconsistent with the analysis. Sources utilized are poorly documented. The research or investigative process is effective. Adequate information is provided to support the topic. The presentation is effective. Adequate conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. The research topic or purpose is clearly stated, and the significance of the topic is apparent. Most of the sources of information are adequate and credible. Information relevant to the topic is organized to support the research or investigative effort. Analysis is evident. The conclusions are consistent with the analysis. Sources utilized are adequately documented. The research or investigative process is exceptionally effective. Information to support the topic is carefully selected and skillfully utilized. The presentation is highly effective. Superior conceptual understanding of the topic is demonstrated. The research topic or purpose is clearly stated, and the significance of the topic is apparent. Sources of information are well chosen and very credible. Information relevant to the topic is purposefully selected and well organized to support the research or investigative effort. Thorough analysis is evident. The conclusions are insightful and consistent with the analysis. Sources utilized are completely and thoroughly documented. Information may be irrelevant to the topic. Most information is inaccurate, noncredible, or unverifiable. The content and scope of information are inadequate for the topic. Sources of information are not communicated. Some information relevant to the task is employed. Some information is inaccurate, noncredible, or unverifiable. The content and scope of information are somewhat inadequate for the purpose. Sources of information may be inadequately communicated. Information relevant to the topic is provided. Although minor inaccuracies may be present, most information is accurate, credible, and verifiable. The content and scope of information are adequate for the topic. Most sources of information are adequately communicated. Information highly relevant to the topic is provided. Information is detailed, accurate, credible, and verifiable. The content and scope of information fully support the topic. Sources of information are fully and clearly communicated. The presentation is not appropriate for the purpose or topic. Ideas are poorly developed and disorganized. Errors in sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, or usage seriously interfere with the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. The presentation is somewhat appropriate for the purpose and topic. Ideas are partially developed but somewhat disorganized. Errors in sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, or usage may sometimes interfere with the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. The presentation is appropriate for the purpose and topic. Ideas are adequately developed and generally well organized. Errors in sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, or usage seldom interfere with the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. The presentation is highly appropriate for the purpose and topic. Ideas are thoroughly developed and well organized. Sentence structure, grammar, mechanics, word choice, and usage enhance the clarity and effectiveness of the communication. Concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are seldom or never used. Little or no logic or language appropriate to the topic is evident. Few, if any, examples are used to illustrate the concepts presented. Conclusions, if offered, are largely illogical or inaccurate. Some concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are used. Some use of logic and language appropriate to the topic is evident. Some examples are used to illustrate the concepts presented. Conclusions may be somewhat illogical or inaccurate. Concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are accurately used. Logic and language appropriate to the topic are evident. Examples are used to adequately illustrate the concepts presented. Conclusions are generally logical and accurate. Concepts and important ideas pertinent to the topic are skillfully applied. Logic and language appropriate to the topic are present throughout. Examples used enhance understanding of the concepts presented. Conclusions are logical and accurate, and may be insightful. 5 Whole Portfolio Rubric 1 Overall, performance at this level exhibits minimal knowledge and understanding of the variety of skills, concepts, and thought processes expected in social studies. The portfolio reflection reveals minimal understanding of the portfolio’s purpose or a self-awareness of the learning processes entailed in its development. Little or no application of specific skills and demonstration of knowledge are evident, and the work that is presented is exceedingly vague, incomplete, or largely inaccurate. 2 Overall, performance at this level exhibits some knowledge and understanding of the variety of skills, concepts, and thought processes expected in social studies. The portfolio reflection reveals some understanding of the portfolio’s purpose and a self-awareness of the learning processes entailed in its development. Some application of specific skills and demonstration of knowledge are evident, but the work that is presented is somewhat vague, incomplete, or inaccurate. 3 Overall, performance at this level demonstrates adequate knowledge and understanding of the variety of skills, concepts, and thought processes expected in social studies. The portfolio reflection reveals an adequate understanding of the portfolio’s purpose and a self-awareness of the learning processes entailed in its development. Application of specific skills and demonstration of knowledge are evident, and the work that is presented is complete and generally accurate. 4 Overall, performance at this level exhibits superior knowledge and understanding of the variety of skills, concepts, and thought processes expected in social studies. The portfolio reflection reveals a thorough and insightful understanding of the portfolio’s purpose and a self-awareness of the learning processes entailed in its development. Superior application of specific skills and demonstration of knowledge are evident, and the work that is presented is complete, thorough, and accurate. 6