Fourth year Architecture unit: KDA712 Professional Studies: folio of ten scenarios Developed by Moira Cordiner, Ceridwen Owen and Ken Pearson-Smith This is an introductory unit about legal process, practice management and professional ethics as they apply to architectural practice in the building industry. Before the criteria sheet was developed, the learning outcomes were revised so they reflected the intent of the unit better and would more easily translate into criteria for the task. Synopsis of the task and its context The task comprises ten building project scenarios (smaller tasks) involving architectural practice and the selection, execution and administering of building contracts. Each involves students using the skills of situational analysis to identify issues and legal implications from an architect’s perspective. Students then make recommendations to solve problems based on evidence –based arguments. Central to each scenario is responding ethically in terms of the architect’s professional obligations and duty of care to clients. Students are expected to communicate their answers to scenario questions in professional writing and use relevant terminology. Note that the criteria sheet on the next page describes expectations for the folio of ten scenarios, not each one. Match between objectives/learning outcomes and criteria for the task learning outcomes (revised) Task-specific criteria On completion of this unit, you should be able to: To complete the folio of scenarios you are to: 1. demonstrate and apply knowledge of the following to architectural practice: basic theory and concepts of legal process as they apply to the building industry practice management professional ethics 2. use the skills of situational analysis to interpret and critically evaluate architectural practice and building project scenarios to: identify ethical, practical and legal issues and implications make recommendations to solve the problems described in the scenarios, based on evidence-based arguments 1.demonstrate and apply knowledge to: architectural practice selection, execution and administering of building contracts 2. use the skills of situational analysis to interpret and critically evaluate scenarios to: identify issues and implications make recommendations to solve problems based on evidence-based arguments 3. communicate in professional writing 3.communicate in professional writing: expression and English conventions (spelling, punctuation, grammar) using terminology 1 Folio of scenarios- task 1 Criteria Weighting 50% HD DN Across the folio you: 1.demonstrate and apply knowledge to architectural practice CR Across the folio you: consistently demonstrated and consistently demonstrated and perceptively applied comprehensive applied comprehensive knowledge to knowledge to architectural practice architectural practice by: by: accurately relating the relevant basic theory and concepts of legal process to each building industry scenario correctly recalling terms, definitions, factors, forms, types, as required by scenario questions PP Across the majority of the folio you: For at least half of the folio you: demonstrated and applied knowledge to architectural practice by: demonstrated and applied fundamental knowledge to architectural practice by: accurately relating the relevant basic theory and concepts of legal process to each building industry scenario correctly recalling terms, definitions, factors, forms, types, as required by scenario questions correctly stating the main advantages and disadvantages of various architectural practice management processes highlighted in the scenarios accurately relating the relevant basic theory and concepts of legal process to each building industry scenario correctly recalling terms, definitions, factors, forms, types, as required by scenario questions correctly stating advantages and disadvantages of various architectural practice management processes highlighted in the scenarios correctly, and in detail, stating the correctly stating the main main advantages and advantages and disadvantages of disadvantages of, and alternatives various architectural practice to, various architectural practice management processes management processes highlighted in the scenarios highlighted in the scenarios responding ethically in terms of your professional obligations and duty of care, to the challenges posed in the scenarios 2. use the skills of situational analysis to interpret and critically evaluate scenarios to: identify issues and implications make recommendations to solve problems based on evidence-based arguments 3.communicate in professional writing: expression and English conventions (spelling, punctuation, grammar) using terminology used the skills of situational analysis to thoroughly and astutely interpret and critically evaluate scenarios to: used the skills of situational analysis to thoroughly interpret and critically evaluate scenarios to: correctly identify and prioritise the correctly identify the key issues key issues and implications in and implications in terms of legal terms of legal process and process and architect’s architect’s responsibility responsibility make realistic, plausible and fair make realistic, plausible and fair recommendations to solve recommendations to solve problems: problems: based on logically- structured based on logically- structured and convincing alternative and convincing arguments arguments supported by authoritative and supported by authoritative and relevant evidence relevant evidence consistently communicated in fluent professional writing by: using clear, concise and cohesive expression by adhering to English conventions using relevant and accurate terminology Comment and grade 2 used the skills of situational analysis to interpret and critically evaluate scenarios to: correctly identify the key issues and implications in terms of legal process and architect’s responsibility make realistic and fair recommendations to solve problems: based on convincing arguments supported by mostly authoritative and relevant evidence used the skills of situational analysis to interpret and critically evaluate scenarios to: correctly identify the key issues and implications in terms of legal process and architect’s responsibility make mostly realistic and fair recommendations to solve problems: based on partly convincing arguments supported by some authoritative and relevant evidence communicated in fluent professional writing by: communicated in fluent professional writing by: using clear and cohesive expression by adhering to English conventions using relevant and accurate terminology using clear and mostly cohesive expression by adhering to English conventions using relevant and accurate terminology 3