Bibliografía del artículo: Comparación del comportamiento de

advertisement
Bibliografía del artículo: Comparación del comportamiento de ponedoras antes de la puesta
Autores: M. Zupan, A. Kruschwitz, T. Buchwalder, B. Huber-Eicher, y I. Stuhec
Sección: Actualidad profesional
Correspondiente a Albéitar: 118
Bibliografía
1. Appleby, M. C., and S. F. Smith. 1991. Design of nest-boxes for laying cages. Br. Poult. Sci.
32:667–678.
2. Appleby, M. C., S. F. Smith, and B. O. Hughes. 1993. Nesting, dust bathing and perching by
laying hens in cages: Effects of design on behaviour and welfare. Br. Poult. Sci. 34:835–
847.
3. Bubier, N. E. 1996. The behavioural priorities of laying hens: The effect of two methods of
environment enrichment on time budgets. Behav. Proc. 37:239–249.
4. Cooper, J. J., and M. C. Appleby. 1995. Nesting behaviour of hens: Effects of experience on
motivation. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 42:283–295.
5. Cooper, J. J., and M. C. Appleby. 1996. Individual variation in pre-laying behaviour and the
incidence of floor eggs. Br. Poult. Sci. 37:245–253.
6. Cooper, J. J., and M. C. Appleby. 2003. The value of environmental resources to domestic
hens: A comparison of the workrate for food and for nests as a function of time. Anim. Welf.
12:39–52.
7. Cronin, G., K. L. Butler, M. Desnoyers, and J. Barnett. 2005. The use of nest boxes by hens
in cages: What does it mean for welfare? Proc. 7th Eur. Symp. Poult. Welf. 23:121–128.
8. Cronin, G., M. Desnoyers, and J. Barnett. 2006. Pre-laying behaviour and nest-box use by
hens. Page 142 in Proc. 40th Int. Soc. Appl. Ethol. Int. Conf. (Poster) Organizing Comm.,
Bristol, UK.
9. Damme, K. 2006. Geflu¨ geljahrbuch 2006. Zentralverband der Deutschen Geflu¨
gelwirtschaft. Eugen Ulmer GmbH & Co., Stuttgart, Germany.
10. Duncan, I. J. H., and D. Fraser. 1997. Understanding animal welfare. Pages 19–31 in Animal
Welfare. M. C. Appleby and B. O. Hughes, ed. CAB Int., Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
11. Freire, R., M. C. Appleby, and B. O. Hughes. 1997. Assessment of pre-laying motivation in
the domestic hen using social
12. interaction. Anim. Behav. 54:313–319.
13. Ha¨ne, M. 1999. Legehennenhaltung in der Schweiz 1998: Schlussbericht z.Hd. Bundesamt
fu¨ r Vetrina¨rwesen. Bundesamt fu¨ r Vetrina¨rwesen, Bern, Switzerland.
14. Hughes, B. O., and I. J. H. Duncan. 1988. The notion of ethological “need”, models of
motivation and animal welfare. Anim. Behav. 36:1696–1707.
15. Hughes, B. O., I. J. H. Duncan, and M. F. Brown. 1989. The performance of nest building by
domestic hens: Is it more important than the construction of a nest? Anim. Behav. 27:210–
214.
16. Hughes, B. O., A. B. Gilbert, and M. F. Brown. 1986. Categorisation and causes of abnormal
egg shells: Relationship with
17. stress. Br. Poult. Sci. 27:325–337.
18. McGibbon, W. H. 1976. Floor laying—A heritable and environmentally influenced trait of
the domestic fowl. Poult. Sci. 55:765–771.
19. Meijsser, F. M., and B. O. Hughes. 1989. Comparative analysis of pre-laying behaviour in
battery cages and in three alternative systems. Br. Poult. Sci. 30:747–760.
20. Keeling, L. J. 2004. Nesting, perching and dustbathing. Pages 203–213 in Welfare of the
Laying Hen. G. C. Perry, ed. CAB Int., Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
21. Krebs, J. R., and A. Kacelnik. 1991. Decision-making. Pages 105– 136 in Behavioural
Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. J. R.
22. Krebs and N. B. Davies, ed. Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford, UK.
23. Kruschwitz, A., M. Zupan, T. Buchwalder, and B. Huber-Eicher. 2007. Nest preference of
laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus) and their motivation to exert themselves to gain nest
access. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.08.005
24. Reynard, M., and C. J. Savory. 1999. Stress-induced oviposition delays in laying hens:
Duration and consequences for eggshell quality. Br. Poult. Sci. 40:585–591.
25. Rietveld-Piepers, B., H. J. Blockhuis, and P. R. Wiepkema. 1985.
26. Egg-laying behaviour and nest-site selection of domestic hens kept in small floor-pens.
Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 14:75–88.
27. SAS Institute. 2002. Release 9.1 ed. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.
28. Sherwin, C. M., and C. J. Nicol. 1993. A descriptive account of the pre-laying behaviour of
hens housed individually in modified cages with nests. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 38:49–60.
29. Struelens, E., F. A. M. Tuyttens, A. Janssen, T. Leroy, L. Audoorn, E. Vranken, K. De Baere,
F.O¨ dberg, D. Berckmans, J. Zoons, and B. Sonck. 2005. Design of laying nests in
furnished cages: Influence of nesting material, nest-box position and seclusion. Br. Poult.
Sci. 46:9–15.
30. Swiss Animal Protection Regulations. 1981. Art. 27 (1), (2)e.
31. Swiss Animal Welfare Act. 1978. Art. 5 (1).
32. Yue, S., and I. J. H. Duncan. 2003. Frustrated nesting behaviour: Relation to extra-cuticular
shell calcium and bone strength in White Leghorn hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 44:175–181.
33. Zimmerman, P. H., P. Koene, and J. A. R. A. M. van Hooff. 2000. Thwarting of behaviour in
different contexts and the
34. gackel-call in the laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 69:255–264.
Download