S U B D I V I S I O N
A N D
D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D
Meeting No. 46HR3/11
A G E N D A
Wednesday, 9:00 A.M.
November 16, 2011
Hearing Room No. 3
Main Floor, Churchill Building
2
Meeting No.: 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD
HEARING ROOM NO.3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9:00 A.M. SDAB-D-11-255 Construct a Carport. I
114904881-001 3737 – 21 Street NW
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BREAK – 10:15 A.M. TO 10:30 A.M.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10:30 A.M.
106077945-004
SDAB-D-11-256 Construct an Accessory
Building (6.79 metres by
7.39 metres detached
II
Garage), existing without permits (originally approved as a 6.71 metres by 6.10 metres detached Garage).
10557 – 76 Avenue NW
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LUNCH BREAK – 12:00 P.M. TO 12:30 P.M.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12:30 P.M. SDAB-D-11-257 Construct a rear III
115887732-001 uncovered deck (irregular shaped), existing without permits.
801 - Wells Wynd NW
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2:00 P.M.
114558753-002
SDAB-D-11-258 Construct a rear addition to a Single Detached
IV
House (one Storey breezeway and rear two-
Storey attached Garage with living space above).
11941 – 57 Street NW
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE:
Unless otherwise stated, all references to “Section numbers” in this Agenda refer to the authority under the Edmonton Zoning Bylaw 12800.
3
Meeting No. 46HR3/11
ITEM I: 9:00 A.M.
I
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-255
AN APPEAL FROM THE DECISION OF THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
APPELLANT: Application No.: 114904881-001.
DEVELOPMENT OFFICER’S DECISION DATE: October 14, 2011.
ADDRESS OF APPELLANT: 3737 – 21 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6T 1V8.
DATE OF APPEAL: October 20, 2011.
APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO: Construct a Carport.
ZONE: RF4 Semi-detached Residential Zone.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 9A, Block 34, Plan 0125035.
MUNICIPAL DESCRIPTION: 3737 – 21 Street NW.
___________________________________________________________________
DEVELOPMENT OFFICER’S DECISION
“REFUSED - The proposed development was refused for the following reason:
On any Site zoned RF4 that has a Site Width of less than 10.4 metres, the minimum distance from the Rear Lot Line to a detached
Garage where the vehicle doors face the Lane shall be 2.75 metres.
(Reference Section 50.3(4)(e)(ii)).
Required: 2.75 metres
Proposed: 1.20 metres
Deficient by: 1.55 metres.”
___________________________________________________________________
APPELLANT’S SUBMISSION
“I purchased the duplex in December 2009. Before buying this duplex, I checked if the development would support a carport or garage. I was told to follow the City of
Edmonton “Standard Garage Details”, go to a building supply store, request a package, and submit when ready to build. In February, April, and May 2011, when
I inquired again about a few technical questions, I was told the same thing follow the on-line package. Inquiries on RF4 Zoning or my site address yielded no special treatment or rules and certainly no reference was made at any time to the setback being 2.75 metres from the property line. In August 2011, when I made a formal cont’d….
4
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-255
9:00 A.M.
APPELLANT’S SUBMISSION (CONTINUED) request, I found out the Bylaw was amended in December 2010, requiring a 2.75 metre setback from the property line versus the 1.2 metre setback shown in the online literature. The application was refused and I had to appeal if I wanted a 1.2 metre setback from the rear property line.
I initiated expanded parking in part due to the City of Edmonton changing winter parking, respecting applying for a permit, development plans for this site, and desire to maintain permanent structure for this type of development. This appeal was initiated because I feel consuming an additional 1.75 metres of my back yard a serious problem. Consuming this additional percentage of a small yard does not make any sense to me. Review of all garages on the RF4 side of the rear lane shows 3 of 3 at 1.2 metres from the closest garage point to the edge of the property line. On the east side of the lane, all but one garage is at 1.2 metres from the edge of the property to the garage. They all have an additional 1 metre from the property to the asphalt on the laneway. The Second reason is precedent in development found backing onto the rear lane on both the east and west side that is clearly established as all but one development is at 1.2 metres. If I would have received notice of this Bylaw change, my application would have been submitted immediately.”
___________________________________________________________________
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD OFFICER’S COMMENTS
This application is to construct a Carport.
The site is located on the east side of 21 Street and north of 37A Avenue and is zoned RF4 Semi-detached Residential Zone, Section 150 of the Edmonton Zoning
Bylaw 12800. The site is within The Meadows Area Structure Plan, under Bylaw
13531 (as amended), approved by City Council on January 21, 2004 and within the
Wild Rose Neighbourhood Structure Plan, under Bylaw 8817 (as amended), approved by City Council on March 22, 1998. cont’d….
5
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-255
9:00 A.M.
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD OFFICER’S COMMENTS
(CONTINUED)
NOTE: The Real Property Report by Geodetic Surveys & Engineering Ltd., dated
April 4, 2005, shows that the lot is 8.39 metres by 37.01 metres in size. The principal building is one half of a Semi-detached House. The proposed
Carport is 3.05 metres by 4.87 metres in size and is located 1.20 metres from the (east) Rear Lot Line and 0.90 metres from the (south) Side Lot Line.
The Development Officer has indicated that the Height of the proposed carport is 4.3 metres and one Storey.
Section 50.3(4)(e)(ii) states that where the Accessory Building is a Detached
Garage and where the vehicle doors of the Detached Garage face a Lane abutting the Site, no portion of the Garage shall be located less than 4.88 metres from the Rear Lot Line, except on any Site zoned RF4 that has a Site width of less than 10.4 metres, the minimum distance from the Rear Lot
Line to a Detached Garage where the vehicle doors face the Lane shall be
2.75 metres.
The subject site has a Site Width of 8.39 metres, therefore the minimum distance from the Rear Lot Line to the proposed Carport shall be 2.75 metres, proposed is 1.20 metres, and is deficient in the minimum required distance from the Rear Lot Line to a Detached Garage by 1.55 metres.
Under Section 6.1(2) states Accessory means, when used to describe a Use or building, a Use or building naturally or normally incidental, subordinate, and exclusively devoted to the principal Use or building, and located on the same lot or Site.
Under Section 6.1(39), Garage means an Accessory building, or part of a principal building designed and used primarily for the storage of motor vehicles and includes a carport.
Under Section 6.1(77), Rear Lot Line means either the property line of a lot which is furthest from and opposite the Front Lot Line, or, where there is no such property line, the point of intersection of any property lines other than a Front Lot Line which is furthest from and opposite the Front Lot Line. cont’d….
6
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-255
9:00 A.M.
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD OFFICER’S COMMENTS
(CONTINUED)
Under Section 6.1(90), Site Width means the horizontal distance between the side boundaries of the Site measured at a distance from the Front Lot
Line equal to the required Front Setback for the Zone.
The Development Officer provides the following information:
Site Area:
43 percent allowable Total Site Coverage:
310.41 square metres
133.48 square metres
Existing Principal Building with attached Garage: 67.67 square metres
Proposed Accessory Structure (carport): 14.82 square metres
Proposed Total Site Coverage: 82.49 square metres
Section 150.4(5)(b) states if the Site Width is less than 9.2 metres, the maximum total Site Coverage shall not exceed 43 percent, with a maximum of 28 percent for a principal building and a maximum of 17 percent for
Accessory Buildings. Where a Garage is attached to or designed as an integral part of a Dwelling, the maximum for the principal building shall be
40 percent.
Under Section 6.1(89), Site Coverage means the total horizontal area of all buildings or structures on a Site which are located at or higher than
1.0 metres above grade, including Accessory Buildings or Structures, calculated by perpendicular projection onto a horizontal plane from one point located at an infinite distance above all buildings and structures on the
Site. This definition shall not include: a.
steps, eaves, cornices, and similar projections; b.
driveways, aisles and parking lots unless they are part of a Parking
Garage which extends 1.0 metres or more above grade; or c.
unenclosed inner and outer courts, terraces and patios where these are less than 1.0 metres above grade. cont’d….
7
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-255
9:00 A.M.
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD OFFICER’S COMMENTS
(CONTINUED)
The following permit applications are listed in the Sustainable Development
Department’s POSSE system:
Application
Number
Description Decision
46228037-001 Compliance Certificate
13027887-001 Compliance Certificate
1070396-001 To construct a Semi-detached
House with attached garages, fireplaces and front verandas.
April 13, 2005; Issued.
May 9, 2002; Stamped.
This Development was approved with conditions. A
Search through POSSE could not find the date when the
Development Permit was issued. A Building Permit was issued March 1, 2002.
__________________________________________________________________
NOTICE TO APPLICANT/APPELLANT
Provincial legislation requires that the Subdivision and Development Appeal Board issue its official decision in writing within fifteen days of the conclusion of the hearing. Bylaw No. 11136 requires that a verbal announcement of the Board’s decision shall be made at the conclusion of the hearing of an appeal, but the verbal decision is not final nor binding on the Board until the decision has been given in writing in accordance with the Municipal Government Act.
___________________________________________________________________
8
SURROUNDING LAND USE DISTRICTS
Site Location
File: SDAB-D-11-255
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD
N
9
Meeting No. 46HR3/11
ITEM II: 10:30 A.M.
II
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-256
AN APPEAL FROM THE DECISION OF THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
APPELLANT: Application No.: 106077945-004.
DEVELOPMENT OFFICER’S DECISION DATE: October 19, 2011.
ADDRESS OF APPELLANT: 209, 625 – Parsons Road NW, Edmonton, AB, T6X
0A9.
DATE OF APPEAL: October 25, 2011.
APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO: Construct an Accessory Building (6.79 metres by 7.39 metres detached
Garage) existing without permits
(originally approved as a 6.71 metres by 6.10 metres detached Garage).
ZONE: RF3 Low Density Development Zone.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 7, Block 48, Plan I25.
MUNICIPAL DESCRIPTION: 10557 – 76 Avenue NW.
___________________________________________________________________
DEVELOPMENT OFFICER’S DECISION
“REFUSED - The proposed development was refused for the following reasons:
The site coverage of Accessory Buildings or Structures shall not exceed 12 percent. (Reference Section 50.3(3)).
Allowable: 12.0 percent
Existing: 13.6 percent
Exceeds by: 1.6 percent
An Accessory Building or Structure shall be located not less than 0.9 metres (3.0 feet) from the side lot line. (Reference Section
50.3(4)(b)).
Required: 0.90 metres
Existing: 0.69 metres
Deficient by: 0.21 metres cont’d….
10
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-256
10:30 A.M.
DEVELOPMENT OFFICER’S DECISION CONTINUED
Note: It is strongly advised that the applicant meet the requirements of Section 814.3(23) as follows: a) the applicant shall contact the affected parties, being each assessed owner of land wholly or partly located within a distance of 60.0 metres of the Site of the proposed development and the
President of each affected Community League. b) the applicant shall outline to the affected parties any requested variances to the Overlay and solicit their comments on the application; c) the applicant shall document any opinions or concerns expressed by the affected parties and what modifications were made to address their concerns; and d) the applicant shall submit this documentation as part of the
Development Application.”
___________________________________________________________________
APPELLANT’S SUBMISSION
“Unbeknownst to Kenneth and Beverly Hadlington, the former home owners of the above noted legal address, municipally described as 10557 – 76 Avenue,
Edmonton, Alberta, the detached garage was not built in accordance to the
Development Permit as granted on September 9, 1997.
Upon sale of the property, the Real Property survey submitted to the City of
Edmonton for compliance revealed that there was insufficient side yard allowance and that the site coverage exceeding that provided for in the Development Permit.
Application for a new permit submitted to the Current Planning Branch of City of
Edmonton in October 2011 was refused for the above reasons.
The garage has stood for 13 years without incident or complaint and it is their wish to have a Permit issued for the garage as built.”
___________________________________________________________________ cont’d….
11
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-256
10:30 A.M.
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD OFFICER’S COMMENTS
This application is to construct an Accessory Building (6.79 metres by 7.39 metres
Detached Garage) existing without permits (originally approved as a 6.71 metres by
6.10 metres Detached Garage).
The site is located on the south side of 76 Avenue west of 105A Street and is zoned
RF3 Low Density Development Zone, Section 140 of the Edmonton Zoning Bylaw
12800. The site is within the Mature Neighbourhood Overlay, Section 814.
NOTE: The Real Property Report by Geodetic Surveys & Engineering Ltd., dated
December 16, 2010 indicates that the subject site is 9.13 metres by 40.21 metres in size. The existing Detached Garage is 7.39 metres by 6.79 metres in size and is located 4.31 metres from the (south) Rear Lot Line, 0.69 metres from the (west) Side Lot Line and 1.02 metres from the (east) Side
Lot Line. The Garage Eaves are 0.38 metres in width.
The Development Officer provides the following information:
Site Area: 368.77 square metres
12 percent Allowable Site Coverage:
28 percent Allowable Site Coverage:
40 percent Allowable Site Coverage:
Existing Principal Dwelling:
Proposed Accessory Building:
Proposed Total Site Coverage:
44.25 square metres
103.26 square metres
147.51 square metres
94.33 square metres
50.18 square metres
144.51 square metres
Section 140.4(5) states that the maximum total Site Coverage shall not exceed 40 percent, with a maximum of 28 percent for a principal building and a maximum of 12 percent for Accessory Buildings.
Section 50.3(3)(a) states that the Site Coverage of Accessory Buildings, with or without a Garage Suite, or Structures shall not exceed 12 percent, unless a different standard is prescribed within the regulations contained within the relevant Zone. The maximum allowable Site Coverage for an
Accessory Building is 44.24 square metres, proposed is 50.18 square metres, which exceeds the maximum allowable Site Coverage for an Accessory
Building by 5.93 square metres. cont’d….
12
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-256
10:30 A.M.
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD OFFICER’S COMMENTS
(CONTINUED)
Section 50.3(4)(b) states that an Accessory Building or Structure shall be located not less than 0.9 metres from the Side Lot Line, except where it is a mutual Garage erected on the common property line to the satisfaction of the Development Officer, or where a Garage is placed on the common property line in accordance with the provisions of the RPL Zone, or where the Accessory Building does not exceed the permitted fence height or in the case of Garage Suites, where the minimum Side Setback shall be in accordance with Section 87. The existing Detached Garage is located 0.69 metres from the west Side Lot Line, which is deficient by 0.21 metres.
The Development Officer has not refused this application on the basis of a violation of the Mature Neighbourhood Overlay.
Section 814.3(23) states where an application for a Development Permit does not comply with the regulations contained in this Overlay: a.
the applicant shall contact the affected parties, being each assessed owner of land wholly or partly located within a distance of 60.0 metres of the Site of the proposed development and the President of each affected Community League, at least 21 days prior to submission of a
Development Application; b.
the applicant shall outline, to the affected parties, any requested variances to the Overlay and solicit their comments on the application; c.
the applicant shall document any opinions or concerns, expressed by the affected parties, and what modifications were made to address their concerns; and d.
the applicant shall submit this documentation as part of the
Development Application.
Under Section 6.1(89), Site Coverage means the total horizontal area of all buildings or structures on a Site which are located at or higher than 1.0 metres above grade, including Accessory Buildings or Structures, calculated by perpendicular projection onto a horizontal plane from one point located at an infinite distance above all buildings and structures on the Site. This definition shall not include: cont’d….
13
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-256
10:30 A.M.
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD OFFICER’S COMMENTS
(CONTINUED) a.
steps, eaves, cornices, and similar projections; b.
driveways, aisles and parking lots unless they are part of a Parking
Garage which extends 1.0 metres or more above grade; or c.
unenclosed inner and outer courts, terraces and patios where these are less than 1.0 metres above grade.
Under Section 6.1(85), Side Lot Line means the property line of a lot other than a Front Lot Line or Rear Lot Line.
Under Section 6.1(2), Accessory means, when used to describe a Use or building, a Use or building naturally or normally incidental, subordinate, and exclusively devoted to the principal Use or building, and located on the same lot or Site.
Section 814.1 states that the purpose of this Overlay is to ensure that new low density development in Edmonton’s mature residential neighbourhoods is sensitive in scale to existing development, maintains the traditional character and pedestrian-friendly design of the streetscape, ensures privacy and sunlight penetration on adjacent properties and provides opportunity for discussion between applicants and neighbouring affected parties when a development proposes to vary the Overlay regulations.
Section 140.1 states that the purpose of this Zone is to provide primarily for
Single Detached and Semi-detached Housing while allowing small-scale conversion and infill redevelopment to housing forms containing up to four
Dwellings per building, and including Secondary Suites under certain conditions. cont’d….
14
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-256
10:30 A.M.
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD OFFICER’S COMMENTS
(CONTINUED)
The following permit applications are listed in the Sustainable Development
Department’s POSSE system:
Description Decision Application
Number
115428274-001
106077945-003
SDAB-D-11-045
October 28, 2011; Cancelled.
March 11, 2011;
The Board did not assume jurisdiction due to the late filing of the appeal.
Compliance Certificate
Construct an Accessory
Building (6.79 metres by
7.39 metres Detached
Garage), existing without permits (originally approved as a 6.71 metres by 6.10 metres Detached
Garage) on Lot 7, Block
48, Plan I25 was refused due to an excess in the maximum allowable Site
Coverage for an Accessory
Building or Structure and a deficiency in the minimum required distance from the
Detached Garage to the side Lot Line.
106077945-001 To construct an Accessory
Building (6.79 metres X
7.39 metres Detached
Garage) Existing without permits (Originally approved as a 6.71 metres
X 6.10 metres Detached
Garage).
January 10, 2011; Refused. cont’d….
15
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-256
10:30 A.M.
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD OFFICER’S COMMENTS
(CONTINUED)
Description Decision Application
Number
106046541-001 Compliance Certificate January 7, 2011; Your Real
Property Report, dated
December 16 , 2010 shows a
Single Detached House that does NOT comply with either the RF3 (Low Density
Development) Zone, or The
Mature Neighbourhood Overlay development regulations. The building should have:
-The minimum Front Yard shall be 6 metres. (Reference Section
140.4(6)).
-Where the Site Width is 12.0 metres or less, the minimum for each interior Side Yard shall be
1.2 metres, regardless of building Height; (Reference
Section 814.3(13)(a)). .
However the building is NON-
CONFORMING pursuant to the Municipal Government
Act's Section 643(5). This means that a non-conforming building may continue to be used but the building may not be enlarged, added to, rebuilt or structurally altered except:
(a) to make it a conforming building,
(b) for routine maintenance of the building, if the development authority
16
106046541-001
(continued)
106077749-001 considers it necessary,
or
(c) in accordance with a land use bylaw that provides minor variance powers to the development authority for the purposes of this section.
The Detached Garage shown on the Real Property Report is
NOT located in accordance with the Development Permit granted September 9, 1997.
(Development
No.596119-001).
Permit
-Development Permit No.
596119-001 approved the
Garage as 6.10 metres x 6.71 metres.
-Development Permit No.
596119-001 approved the
Garage Side Yard as 1.52 metres.
A Development Permit and
Building Permit must be obtained for changing the size and location of the Garage.
945067-001
660483-001
596119-001
To leave as built an
Accessory Building
(Detached Garage).
To construct an addition to a
Single Detached House
(Family room basement and bedroom and second floor addition and balcony) 4.26 metres x 6.0 metres
To construct an addition to a single detached house - rear addition 6.71 metres x 4.27 metres.
To construct an Accessory
Building (Detached Garage)
6.1 metres x 6.71 metres
December 24, 2010; Cancelled.
October 3, 2000; Approved with conditions.
July 29, 1998; Approved with a variance and a condition.
September 9, 1997; Approved with conditions.
___________________________________________________________________ cont’d….
17
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-256
10:30 A.M.
NOTICE TO APPLICANT/APPELLANT
Provincial legislation requires that the Subdivision and Development Appeal Board issue its official decision in writing within fifteen days of the conclusion of the hearing. Bylaw No. 11136 requires that a verbal announcement of the Board’s decision shall be made at the conclusion of the hearing of an appeal, but the verbal decision is not final nor binding on the Board until the decision has been given in writing in accordance with the Municipal Government Act.
___________________________________________________________________
18
Site Location
File: SDAB-D-11-256
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD
N
19
Meeting No. 46HR3/11
ITEM III: 12:30 P.M.
III
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-257
AN APPEAL FROM THE DECISION OF THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
APPELLANT: Application No.: 115887732-001.
DEVELOPMENT OFFICER’S DECISION DATE: October 17, 2011.
ADDRESS OF APPELLANT: 16212 – 83 Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB, T5R 3V5.
DATE OF APPEAL: October 24, 2011.
APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO: Construct a rear uncovered deck
(irregular shaped), existing without permits.
ZONE: RF1 Single Detached Residential Zone.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 155, Block 42, Plan 8922720.
MUNICIPAL DESCRIPTION: 801 - Wells Wynd NW.
___________________________________________________________________
DEVELOPMENT OFFICER’S DECISION
“REFUSED - The proposed development was refused for the following reasons:
The maximum total site coverage shall not exceed 40 percent, with a maximum of 28 percent for the principal building and a maximum of
12 percent for accessory buildings. Where a garage is attached to or designed as an integral part of a Dwelling the maximum for the principal building shall be 40 percent. (Reference Section 110.4(5)).
Allowable Coverage: 40.0 percent
Existing Coverage: 42.8 percent
Exceeds By: 2.8 percent
Platform Structures provided such projections do not exceed 2.0 metres into Setbacks or Separation Spaces with a depth of at least 4.0 metres. (Reference Section 44.3(a)).
Allowable Projection: 2.0 metres
Existing Projection: 2.86 metres
Exceeds By: 0.86 metres.”
___________________________________________________________________ cont’d....
20
Meeting No. 46HR3/11
APPELLANT’S SUBMISSION
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-257
12:30 P.M.
“We are currently trying to sell our home at 801 Wells Wynd. We moved to my mother’s house so that we can care for her as she is in ailing health at 83 years of age. When we built the deck seventeen or eighteen years ago we were unaware that we needed a permit to do so. Upon listing the house our realtor informed us that we would need to apply for development and building permits even though the deck was already built. It is a well built structure with stucco finish, aluminum railings and glass panelling. We have discussed the situation with our neighbours and they are supportive of our appeal. They are in agreement that the deck is in no way unappealing, unsafe or in need of renovation. We are requesting that you reconsider the decision to deny the permits.”
___________________________________________________________________
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD OFFICER’S COMMENTS
This application is to construct a rear uncovered deck (irregular shaped), existing without permits.
The site is located in a cul-de-sac on the east side of Wells Wynd, which backs onto the west side of Wedgewood Boulevard. The site is zoned RF1 Single Detached
Residential Zone, Section 110 of the Edmonton Zoning Bylaw 12800. The site is within the West Jasper Place (South) Area Structure Plan, under Bylaw 5768 (as amended), approved by City Council on September 24, 1979 and within the
Wedgewood Heights Neighbourhood Structure Plan, under Bylaw 8240 (as amended), approved by City Council on June 25, 1986.
NOTE: The Real Property Report by Hagen Surveys (1982) Ltd., dated September
28, 2011 shows a lot with a (west) arced Site Width of 15.62 metres, an
(east) Site Width of 15.50 metres, a (north) Site depth of 35.04 metres and a
(south) Site depth of 33.97 metres. The proposed rear uncovered deck is located on the (east) rear elevation of the Principal building. The deck is irregular shaped and is 1.72 metres from the (north) Side Lot Line and 4.64 metres from the (east) Rear Lot Line. The Height of the deck is 1.70 metres above Grade and the total Height of the deck with the railing is 2.75 metres. cont’d....
21
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-257
12:30 P.M.
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD OFFICER’S COMMENTS
(CONTINUED)
The Development Officer provides the following information:
Site Area: 540.21 square metres
40 percent Total Allowable Site Coverage: 216.08 square metres
Principal Dwelling:
Rear uncovered deck:
208.29 square metres
22.85 square metres
Proposed Total Site Coverage: 231.14 square metres
Section 110.4(5) states that the maximum total Site Coverage shall not exceed 40 percent, with a maximum of 28 percent for a principal building and a maximum of 12 percent for Accessory Buildings. Where a Garage is attached to or designed as an integral part of a Dwelling, the maximum Site
Coverage for the principal building shall be 40 percent. The maximum allowable total Site Coverage is 216.08 square metres, proposed is 231.14 square metres, which exceeds the maximum allowable total Site
Coverage by 15.06 square metres.
Section 110.4(7) states that the minimum Rear Setback shall be 7.5 metres.
Section 44.3(a) states that Platform Structures may project into a required
Setback or Separation Space, provided such projections do not exceed 2.0 metres into Setbacks or Separation Spaces with a depth of at least 4.0 metres. The proposed uncovered deck projects 2.86 metres into the required
Setback, which exceeds the maximum allowable projection by 0.86 metres.
Under Section 6.1(59), Platform Structures means structures projecting from the wall of a building that may be surrounded by guardrails or parapet walls. Common structures include: balconies, raised terraces and decks. cont’d....
22
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-257
12:30 P.M.
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD OFFICER’S COMMENTS
(CONTINUED)
Under Section 6.1(89), Site Coverage means the total horizontal area of all buildings or structures on a Site which are located at or higher than
1.0 metres above grade, including Accessory Buildings or Structures, calculated by perpendicular projection onto a horizontal plane from one point located at an infinite distance above all buildings and structures on the
Site. This definition shall not include: a.
steps, eaves, cornices, and similar projections; b.
driveways, aisles and parking lots unless they are part of a Parking
Garage which extends 1.0 metres or more above grade; or c.
unenclosed inner and outer courts, terraces and patios where these are less than 1.0 metres above grade.
Under Section 6.1(84), Setback means the distance that a development or a specified portion of it, must be set back from a property line. A Setback is not a Yard, Amenity Space, or Separation Space.
Under Section 6.1(78), Rear Setback means the distance that a development or a specified portion of it, must be set back from a Rear Lot
Line. A Rear Setback is not a Rear Yard, Amenity Space or Separation
Space.
The following permit application is listed in the Sustainable Development
Department POSSE system:
Application Number Description
75314-001 To construct a Single
Decision
May 8, 1991; Approved with conditions. Detached House with front access garage and fireplace.
___________________________________________________________________ cont’d....
23
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-257
12:30 P.M.
NOTICE TO APPLICANT/APPELLANT
Provincial legislation requires that the Subdivision and Development Appeal Board issue its official decision in writing within fifteen days of the conclusion of the hearing. Bylaw No. 11136 requires that a verbal announcement of the Board’s decision shall be made at the conclusion of the hearing of an appeal, but the verbal decision is not final nor binding on the Board until the decision has been given in writing in accordance with the Municipal Government Act.
___________________________________________________________________
24
SURROUNDING LAND USE DISTRICTS
Site Location
File: SDAB-D-11-257
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD
N
25
Meeting No. 46HR3/11
ITEM IV: 2:00 P.M.
IV
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-258
AN APPEAL FROM THE DECISION OF THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
APPELLANT: Application No.: 114558753-002.
DEVELOPMENT OFFICER’S DECISION DATE: September 26, 2011.
ADDRESS OF APPELLANT: 26, 9505 – 176 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T5T
5Z4.
DATE OF APPEAL: October 19, 2011.
APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO: Construct a rear addition to a Single
Detached House (one Storey breezeway and rear two-Storey attached Garage with living space above).
ZONE: RF3 Low Density Development Zone.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 20, Block 55, Plan 4636AB.
MUNICIPAL DESCRIPTION: 11941 – 57 Street NW.
___________________________________________________________________
DEVELOPMENT OFFICER’S DECISION
“REFUSED - The proposed development was refused for the following reason:
Section 814.3(17), the minimum Rear Setback shall be 40 percent of
Site depth. Row Housing not oriented to a public roadway, is exempt from this Overlay requirement.
Required: 15.00 metres
Proposed: 6.71 metres
Deficient by: 8.29 metres
Note: It is strongly advised that the applicant meet the requirements of Section 814.3(23) as follows: a) the applicant shall contact the affected parties, being each assessed owner of land wholly or partly located within a distance of 60.0 metres of the Site of the proposed development and the
President of each affected Community League. b) the applicant shall outline to the affected parties any requested variances to the Overlay and solicit their comments on the application; cont’d....
26
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-258
2:00 P.M.
DEVELOPMENT OFFICER’S DECISION (CONTINUED) c) the applicant shall document any opinions or concerns expressed by the affected parties and what modifications were made to address their concerns; and d) the applicant shall submit this documentation as part of the
Development Application.”
___________________________________________________________________
APPELLANT’S SUBMISSION
“If I have 40 percent of my lot behind my house empty, I will not have room for a garage. Also the house next door does not have 40 percent of his lot empty and he has exactly what I have requested.”
___________________________________________________________________
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD OFFICER’S COMMENTS
This application is to construct a rear addition to a Single Detached House (one storey breezeway and rear 2 storey attached garage with living space above).
The site is located on the east side of 57 Street north of 119 Avenue and is zoned
RF3 Low Density Development Zone, Section 140 of the Edmonton Zoning Bylaw
12800. The site is within the Mature Neighbourhood Overlay, Section 814.
NOTE: The Board is advised that the decision of refusal by the Development
Officer is dated September 26, 2011. Fourteen days from the decision date is October 10, 2011 and the Notice of Appeal was filed on October 19,
2011. It should be noted that October 10, 2011 was a Statutory Holiday.
Section 686(1)(a)(i) of the Municipal Government Act states “a development appeal to a subdivision and development appeal board is commenced by filing a notice of the appeal, containing reasons, with the board within 14 days….after the date on which the person is notified of the order or decision or the issuance of the development permit.”
Single Detached Housing is a Permitted Use in the RF3 Low Density
Development Zone, Section 140.2(6). cont’d....
27
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-258
2:00 P.M.
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD OFFICER’S COMMENTS
(CONTINUED)
Under Section 7.2(9), Single Detached Housing means development consisting of a building containing only one Dwelling, which is separate from any other Dwelling or building. Where a Secondary Suite is a
Permitted or Discretionary Use Class in a Zone, a building which contains
Single Detached Housing may also contain a Secondary Suite. This Use
Class includes Mobile Homes which conform to Section 78 of this Bylaw.
The submitted Site Plan by AB Design Inc. dated July 20, 2011, shows a Lot that is 10.06 metres by 37.49 metres in size. The proposed Principal
Dwelling is located 7.01 metres from the (west) Front Lot Line, 1.52 metres from the (south) Side Lot Line, 1.22 metres from the (north) Side Lot Line and 6.71 metres from the (east) Rear Lot Line. The proposed building
Height is 7.67 metres.
Section 814.3(17) states that the minimum Rear Setback shall be 40 percent of Site Depth. Forty percent of the Site Depth is 15.00 metres, the proposed
Rear Setback is 6.71 metres, which is deficient in the minimum required
Rear Setback, that being 40 percent of the Site Depth, by 8.29 metres.
Under Section 6.1(78), Rear Setback means the distance that a development or a specified portion of it, must be set back from a Rear Lot
Line. A Rear Setback is not a Rear Yard, Amenity Space or Separation
Space.
The Development Officer provides the following information:
Site Area: 377.10 square metres
40 percent allowable Total Site Coverage: 150.84 square metres
Proposed Total Site Coverage
(including rear attached Garage): 150.00 square metres cont’d....
28
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-258
2:00 P.M.
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD OFFICER’S COMMENTS
(CONTINUED)
Under Section 140.4(5), the maximum total Site Coverage shall not exceed
40 percent, with a maximum of 28 percent for a principal building and a maximum of 12 percent for Accessory Buildings. Where a Garage is attached to or designed as an integral part of a Dwelling, the maximum for the principal building is 40 percent.
Under Section 6.1(89), Site Coverage means the total horizontal area of all buildings or structures on a Site which are located at or higher than
1.0 metres above grade, including Accessory Buildings or Structures, calculated by perpendicular projection onto a horizontal plane from one point located at an infinite distance above all buildings and structures on the
Site. This definition shall not include: a.
steps, eaves, cornices, and similar projections; b.
driveways, aisles and parking lots unless they are part of a Parking
Garage which extends 1.0 metres or more above grade; or c.
unenclosed inner and outer courts, terraces and patios where these are less than 1.0 metres above grade;
Section 814.3(1) states that the Front Setback shall be consistent, within 1.0 metres with the Setback of development on adjacent Sites and with the general context of the block face, but shall not be less than 3.0 metres.
Separation Space shall be reduced to accommodate the Front Setback requirement where a Principal Living Room Window faces directly onto a local public roadway, other than a Lane.
Included under ‘Comments’ in the Sustainable Development Department
POSSE system dated September 26, 2011, the Development Officer has provided the following information:
TECHNICAL REVIEW
RF3 MNO, Newton
Section 140.2(6), Single Detached Housing is a permitted use. cont’d....
29
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-258
2:00 P.M.
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD OFFICER’S COMMENTS
(CONTINUED)
Section 140.4(1)(a), The minimum Site Area shall be 360 square metres for each Single Detached Dwelling.
Proposed: 377.10 square metres
Section 140.4(2)(a), The minimum Site Width shall be 12.0 metres for each Single Detached Dwelling, with or without a Secondary
Suite.
Proposed: 10.06 metres
(Note: Minimum Site Area Exception complies)
Section 140.4(3), The minimum Site Depth shall be 30.0 metres.
Proposed: 37.49 metres
Section 140.4(5), The maximum total Site Coverage shall not exceed
40 percent, where a Garage is attached to or designed as an integral part of a Dwelling.
Proposed Principal Building: 39.8 percent
Sect6ion 814.3(13)(a), Where the Site Width is 12.0 metres or less, the minimum for each interior Side Setback shall be 1.2 metres, regardless of building Height.
Proposed Right: 1.52 metres
Proposed Left: 1.22 metres
Section 814.3(16), Where a structure is two or more Storeys in
Height and an interior Side Setback is less than 2.0 metres, the applicant may be required to provide information regarding the location of windows and Amenity Areas on adjacent properties, and the windows of the proposed development shall be located to minimize overlook into adjacent properties.
- Right elevation proposes 2 main floor living room windows and 2 second floor master bedroom windows. These windows will face a 2 storey house with 2 second floor windows. No direct overlook.
- Left elevation proposes 1 glass block window in stairwell to storey above the garage. Minimal overlook.
- No additional information requested. cont’d....
30
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-258
2:00 P.M.
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD OFFICER’S COMMENTS
(CONTINUED)
Section 814.3(17), The minimum Rear Setback shall be 40 percent of Site depth. Row Housing not oriented to a public roadway, is exempt from this Overlay requirement.
Required: 15.00 metres
Proposed: 6.71 metres
Deficient by: 8.29 metres
________________________________________________
NOTES
Notwithstanding the Landscaping regulations of Section 55 of this
Bylaw, where new development consists of replacement or infill within areas of existing housing, Landscaping shall be implemented as a component of such new development in order to replace vegetation removed during construction or to reinforce an established Landscaping context in the area.
Included under ‘Justification’ in the Sustainable Development Department
POSSE system dated September 26, 2011, the Development Officer has provided the following information:
Site is zoned RF3 and in the MNO.
Rear setback required as per the MNO is deficient to a 2 storey rear attached garage and 1 storey breezeway. No variances considered since no hardships presented. Development will create a massing affect with the addition of a 2 storey garage. Minimum rear setback for underlying zone does not comply either.
No Community Consultation submitted to date. cont’d....
31
Meeting No. 46HR3/11 Wednesday, November 16, 2011
FILE: SDAB-D-11-258
2:00 P.M.
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD OFFICER’S COMMENTS
(CONTINUED)
The following permit application is listed in the Sustainable Development
Department POSSE system:
Application
Number
Description Decision
114558753-001 To construct a single detached house with rear uncovered deck, front covered veranda, fireplace and basement development.
September 26, 2011;
Approved conditions with
___________________________________________________________________
NOTICE TO APPLICANT/APPELLANT
Provincial legislation requires that the Subdivision and Development Appeal Board issue its official decision in writing within fifteen days of the conclusion of the hearing. Bylaw No. 11136 requires that a verbal announcement of the Board’s decision shall be made at the conclusion of the hearing of an appeal, but the verbal decision is not final nor binding on the Board until the decision has been given in writing in accordance with the Municipal Government Act.
___________________________________________________________________
32
SURROUNDING LAND USE DISTRICTS
Site Location
File: SDAB-D-11-258
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD
N