CHAPTER: IMPLANTER SYSTEMS IMPLANTER CONCEPTS In the early 1960s when the concept of ion implantation of semiconductors and other materials for potential electronics and optoelectronics applications were being conceived and considered, implanters began as simple laboratory ion beam systems built on tabletop vacuum systems, with or without mass separation. Various ion sources, acceleration concepts, and mass separation systems were considered, designed, and implemented, and their performance was studied. At least four previous implementations of ion beam systems played roles in this development, viz., isotope separators, ion propulsion systems, high energy physics beam delivery systems, including van de Graaff generators, and neutron generators. Some of the earliest implanter implementations were based on combinations of concepts and components taken from these existing systems. Most of the interest at this time was for research to learn how the mechanical, optical, and electronic properties of materials could be modified for a wide variety of potential applications, and high ion current for volume production was not yet a significant, or certainly not yet a realized concern. Some early 'implanter' concepts were based on isotope separators, adapted to handle single or multiple semiconductor-related materials at the target location. Some were small van de Graff generators modified to handle 'dopant' gases and to accommodate semiconductor materials and samples at the target. Some systems were built and sold that were based on a neutron generator modified to generate and deliver ion beams of many elements rather than neutrons (from hydrogen beams). This series of implanters, as well as the van de Graaff and high energy physics concepts, performed mass separation on the ion beam after it was accelerated to its final energy. For a short period of time, concepts of mass separation at ground potential, and both ion source and target at high potential were studied, but the difficulties of having the target at high potential, especially accurate current or fluence measurement, ended further implementation of this concept. After many successful results were achieved in the fabrication of controlled useful modifications of the mechanical, optical, and electronic properties of many materials, it became evident that ion implantation was likely to have many industrial/commercial applications and that 'production' needs (high volume and low cost) would require higher ion currents than could be delivered by most of the existing 'implanter' concepts. This need resulted in the creation of 'implanter companies' and the important move into higher ion currents and new concepts for creating uniformly implanted areas, first small and then larger and larger, as the Si wafer industry, in parallel, developed the ability to provide larger and larger Si wafers. This situation continues until today (2003), at which time 12inch Si wafers and 6-inch GaAs wafers are being engineered in large 'fabs (production facilities) around the world. 'Medium current,' 'high current,' and 'MeV energy' implanter industries thrive today. The need for higher ion currents caused a significant change in basic implanter concept and design. Space-charge expansion of positive ion beams (caused by the mutual repulsion between particles of the same charge), which is increasingly serious with decreasing ion velocity (energy), prevented high ion currents from being delivered through mass separators, which required linear distance, and to target handling systems located far from the ion source. Space-charge expansion of positive ion beams can be significantly reduced by injection of electrons into the ion beam, but electric and magnetic fields in and from other components of the beam handling systems removed these charge-compensating electrons; mass separators and beam deflection systems are two examples. Many implanter concepts employed electrostatic scanning of the ion beam to achieve uniformity of implantation at the target. The nature of electrostatic scanning removes electrons for the ion beam. Thus two significant changes necessarily occurred in implanter concept, viz., mass separation of the ion beam as close to the ion source as possible (immediately after extraction from the ion source) and before acceleration to the full ion energy desired for implantation, and mechanical scanning concepts for multiple targets. Thus the mass separator was moved close to the ion source and the accelerator was placed after mass separation, and sophisticated systems to mechanically scan many larger and larger wafers at the target location caused the design of implanters to change, for example, for the 'end stations' or wafer handling chambers to become large, complicated, and costly. More recently, advantages of implanting certain elements more deeply into wafers and materials developed in at least the Si device and circuit community, to the magnitude that it became economical for implanter manufacturers to develop commercial high energy implanters. High energy ion beams had existed for decades in the high energy physics community, but the ion currents used in most of that community are orders of magnitude less than the currents that are needed in the Si device and circuits industry. The relatively large size of the Si device industry placed the primary emphasis on a few selected chemical elements for ion beams, especially B, Si, P, and As. The developing field of silicon-on-insulator caused a small industry to develop to provide fairly high currents of oxygen for implantation into Si to create buried layers of Si02. The need for these layers to be nearer and nearer to the surface as the lateral device dimensions (gate length) decrease, is causing the energy of this oxygen implantation to decrease. Plasma implantation concepts (for energies less than about 5 keV) were implemented to create shallow junction devices in Si, and for various surface modification of materials, for example, hardening. Applications for plasma implantation to create shallow depths may continue to increase. Thus today we see the energy capability of implanters changing in both directions (higher and lower), as well as higher current, but higher current may become practically limited because of the associated issues of target handling, and more efficient target systems may become the issue. At present, members of the semiconductor device industry simply purchase more and more implanters, and build more and more production facilities as chip demand increases. ONE SPECIFIC IMPLANTER IMPLEMENTATION While progress has continued in the directions described above, driven primarily by the increasing production needs of the Si device and circuits industry, the more modest needs of the research sector allowed older concepts of implanter to meet those needs. The needs of the research sector, in which many new materials (beyond Si and GaAs) are the subject of study, emphasize versatility and the need to vary some parameters that are not so important in Si circuit production. The ability to implant all elements of the periodic table is one such specific need. The ability to implant at low fluence and high fluence, at low temperature and at high temperature, at various angles of incidence, and into many different materials and structures, places different requirements on the implanter. These research needs within the former Hughes family of companies and sectors was meet by the one instrument developed at (then) Hughes Research Laboratories in the late 1960s. This machine is still in routine use for many applications (2003). It represents the basic concepts of implantation and is a relatively low cost implementation that uses relatively low cost components, and could be assembled in a university or small business that needs an interactive versatile research implantation capability. For these reasons, this instrument is described in some detail below. It bears little resemblance to implanters used in today's Si wafer production industry. It does implant nearly all elements into all solid materials within a wide variety of conditions. This machine is really an ion mass spectrometer modified to be an 'implanter.' The basic ion energy range is from 5 to 1100 keV (using singly, doubly, or triply ionized ions), with ion current capability decreasing with increasing energy (above 350 keV), and with decreasing current capability below about 100 keV. The ion current capability also varies with the chemical element (implant species) and can be controlled in the range from 1 nA (for fluences in the 109 to 1010 cm-2 range) to 100 A delivered to the target for one isotope (for fluences up to 1018 cm-2). The maximum total ion current for all masses from the ion source is about 1 mA. The implanted area is relatively small, being easily variable from almost zero to a maximum of 4 inches in diameter, which is limited by the diameter of the beam line at the target chamber; it could be conveniently increased only somewhat. This limitation is caused by the use of electrostatic scanning of the beam in two normal directions (which also relates to the current limitation via the issue of beam space-charge neutralization mentioned above). The basic concept involves mass separation of the beam after full acceleration, and two-dimensional electrostatic scanning. These two concepts cause the instrument to have a large footprint, but one for which all components can be easily accessed, maintained, or modified for research purposes, and one that minimizes energy and element contamination in implants. It might be meaningful to note that one significant use of this machine has been to produce samples that serve as quantification standards with accurate densities of single isotopes of nearly all chemical elements implanted into nearly all solid materials. It has also been used extensively to make channeled implants of all elements into the major crystallographic directions of many crystalline materials. It has also been used as a Rutherford backscattering analysis instrument for 600-keV He nuclei. This 400-kV ion mass spectrometer is described in some detail in the following This ion mass spectrometer and the associated gas supply manifolds, dry boxes for element storage, control console, and laminar flow hoods at the targets (2) occupies a floor space about 20 ft by 35 ft. A list of components follows, with technical and philosophical discussion for some components. High voltage terminal The terminal is a lead-covered box that contains the ion source, six power supplies, (three for the ion source and three for the extraction and focusing optics), six leak valves (Granville-Phillips), four connected to four gas bottles (BF3, SiF4, PF3, and AsF3) and two connected to lines from an external manifold, and 12 meters (six voltage and six current) that are read across the high voltage via a closed circuit TV. The terminal is interfaced to an exhaust vent system that never ceases to operate because it has its own emergency power system. Terminal corners should all be well rounded so that electric field lines are not concentrated at corners, which will result in corona, which will produce ozone and which causes leakage from the power supply and limits the current and voltage capability, as well as causing instabilities when operating at high voltage. This terminal as used here cannot be used at voltages greater than about 360 kV on humid days and about 320 on dry days (unless water vapor is supplied in its environment, which we do) with the risk of leakage and corona, which cause instabilities in the voltage, which translates into spatial instabilities in the ion beam at the target . For example, it is desired to maintain stable separation between isotopes of Pb (206, 207, 208) at the mass defining slit for hours. High voltage power supply The 400-kV, 3-mA power supply was custom built by Universal Voltronics (Model BAC 400-3-HRL), The ripple specification is 10-4, which is the same as for the magnet power supply, providing a very spatially stable ion beam at the target. Associated with this power supply and the terminal is a 115 VAC, 3kVA, 400-kV isolation transformer that supplies power to the six lab power supplies in the terminal. High voltage meter A 300-kV precision voltage divider is used as a voltmeter for this system, up to 300 kV. The guaranteed accuracy is to within 0.3 %, but it is designed to be within 0.1 %. Mass separator The mass separation magnet is a double-focusing constant current, 300 A, 40V (12 kW) unit made by High Voltage Engineering [HVE Model HQV 412] with mass-energy product ME = 200 @ 25° and ME = 63 at 45°. The system has beams lines at each of these angles. The magnet power supply is 40V, 300A, with ripple of 10-4. This magnet is normally used with currents less than 130 A; for operation at currents greater than about 100 A, for times longer than one hour, the magnet heats and must be externally cooled. 400-kV accelerators (2, a second one so that cleaning can be done without shutdown) The ones used here consist of 40 Al plates, each with two o-rings and o-ring grooves, plus 40 1-inch glass spacers, plus two end plates, drilled to mate the opposing fittings, and three insulating rods to maintain compression of the accelerator stack and the required vacuum. The unit is designed for 10 kV per Al plate, and a resistor of appropriate characteristics is placed between each pair of plates (40). The ion optics of this constant gradient linear accelerator is designed so that 10 kV/plate must be maintained; thus when the voltage is reduced to less than 400 kV, the ground plane must be moved toward the HV terminal to maintain the constant gradient (10 kV/plate). To operate at 100 kV, for example, the ground plane must be moved from plate number 40 to plate number 10. This is easily accomplished using a flexible braided grounding strap and requires a few seconds. As the voltage on the accelerator is decreased, the velocity of the ions decreases and space-charge expansion of the ion beam causes the diameter of the ion beam to increase and the amount of current that can be delivered through the aperture at the grounded end of the accelerator to decrease. Thus the current delivery capability decreases as the ion energy is decreased from below about 100 kV on the accelerator. The limitation can be eased by employing an accel-decel; the ions are first accelerated to a higher potential to extract a higher current and then decelerated to the final lower potential. A room to enclose the ion accelerator, high voltage terminal, and high voltage power supply This room provides several safety functions, and should be designed accordingly. These features should include a) at least two exhaust systems, one with intake at the floor to exhaust ozone produced by corona at all corners and surfaces that are at high voltage, and one with intake above the terminal and designed to remove any gases that might leak from the internal gas handling systems or from the lines from external gas supplies, b) an rf screen that completely surrounds the volume that contains the ion source and high voltage power supply [This rf screen is needed to protect sensitive electronics that may exist anywhere within at least 100 m of the system, because rf noise is generated during operation.], c) Pb shielding to protect personnel from x-rays that are generated during operation [The x-ray intensity increases at least linearly with voltage and ion current.] The x-ray intensity can be several Roentgens per hour when the voltage is 300 kV and the total current from the ion source is greater than 1 mA. The x-rays are produced where electrons that are produced in the accelerator and are accelerated back up the accelerator, strike materials, which are the plates that comprise the lenses in front of the ion source, and the ion source exit plate.] d) personnel protection from the high voltage, and e) a thick dielectric shield (wall) to isolate the surfaces that are at high voltage from the electrons of the universe and provide a dielectric surface that does not easily terminate electric field lines (created by the high voltage on the terminal and power supply components). Such a room can have an access door that is interlocked with the high voltage power supply so that if the door is opened when the high voltage is on the terminal, the power supply is instantly 'crowbarred' to ground potential. Such an event can be damaging to the power supply so this system should be carefully designed. Gas leak valves There should be a controlled gas leak valve on each gas supply cylinder that supplies the ion source, and on each feed line from an external supply manifold, in order to control the gas flow rate so that the source discharge density can be optimized to produce a well focused ion beam. Often the beam current must be reduced by closing a mechanical slit because in order to form a well focused ion beam, a certain beam current must be extracted, and that current is usually relatively high. This becomes an issue when low fluence implants are required. Ion current integrator (and a replacement unit) A standard current integrator designed to operate in the current range of interest, which incur case is 1 nA to 2 mA, is required Ion beam scanner power supply Beam scanners should be designed to produce two well regulated and stable triangular wave forms of prime number frequencies (but variable) of variable voltage that varies with maximum voltage of the implanter. In our case, these voltages are from 50 V to 5 kV, which is so difficult to do with a single scanner that we use two scanners, one with lower voltage capability and one with higher voltage capability. Beam monitoring oscilloscopes Two oscilloscopes are used to monitor in real time the x and y components of the scanned ion beam that strikes the target and is being integrated. The displays on these scopes are used to adjust steering of the beam, to adjust the ion source and ion optics voltages to optimize the beam, to allow the scanning of the beam to be adjusted to guarantee proper uniformity at the target, to determine the degree and quality of mass separation, to adjust properly the neutral trap voltage (beam deflection after mass separation), and to detect any small drifts in the physical position of the beam at the target that might be caused by a variety of effects. These scopes are the focus of attention during setup and execution of implants. Small adjustments of any of several voltages might be made during a long (hours) implant based upon observations of these scope displays. An x-y recorder to record mass spectra (the components of the ion beam) The signal for the x direction is supplied from a Hall probe that is placed within the region of the magnetic field produced by the mass separation magnet. The signal for the y direction is supplied by the current that reaches the target. Higher resolution mass spectra are achieved by placing a small hole in the center of the 'setup' target position. This approach can be used to separate well the masses of all elements through U. One or two picoammeters are used in recording mass spectra. 400-kV ion mass spectrometer components listing 20 ft by 35 ft of floor space, plus some for access and work space magnet power supply and control unit (High Voltage Engineering model HQV-412 40 V/300 A) constant current ME = 200 @ 25° and 63 @ 45° self-contained di-ionized water cooling system for magnet and power supply 3 current integrators 4 scanners (3, 4, 5 kV) x-y recorder (mass spectra) two picoammeters (mass spectra) 2 dc power supplies (-5 kV) with panel controls for x and y beam steering (deflection) 1 dc power supply (-5 kV) with panel controls for neutral trap beam deflection box to control magnet-to-recorder signal amplitude video monitor to display HV terminal meters closed circuit TV camera system for above 4 ionization gauge controllers 4 ionization gauges to monitor pressure (beam line, terminal, 2 target chambers) 400 kV dc power supply (Universal Voltronics Corp. model BAC-400-3-HRL) deceleration power supply (50 kV dc 5 or 10 mA) automatic LN2 controllers and sensors target bias power supplies (several 180 and 360 V dc 2 mA) x and y beam steering plates 2 slits (one each beam line) for mass separation control and beam current limiting: mechanically or electronically variable from closed to say 2 cm 2 beam shutters (one each beam line) pneumatic or electromagnetic ionization gauges throughout system ionization gauge controllers for above mechanical pump exhaust line system (connected to all mp exhausts) panels for valves and switches one vacuum system vent for each target chamber and one for ion source changing (N2 gas is recommended for target chambers and Ar for the ion source) elapsed time clock scanner control panel HV control panel ion source vacuum gauge laboratory LN2 delivery system 300 (or 400) kV precision voltmeter or divider (inside HV terminal room) (0.3% accuracy) DVM panel meter for above 6 insulator control rods and drives for 6 HV terminal power supplies 6 insulator control rods and drives for 6 HV terminal leak valves panel for above 12 control rods current monitor beam line shutter switch and open/closed position light voltage regulator on power line to HV terminal set of interchangeable ion sources [fluoride gases, dedicated SiF4, chloride/bromide, replacements (spares)] boxes of ion source replacement parts]\ W/Re wire for filaments gas manifold storage box (see list of gases below) vacuum systems, with all valves, TC and ionization gauges, traps, roughing pumps, and control panels and switches one 6-inch oil diffusion pump (ion source and accelerator) with backing pump and LN2 trap two 8-inch cryopumps (one each beam line) and compressors (target chambers) 200 or 400 liter/s ion pumps (one each beam line) and control power supplies one roughing pump for the gas manifold gate valves above every vacuum system one to isolate each beam line one to isolate each target chamber one to isolate accelerator and ion source many high voltage vacuum feedthrus two target chambers, one with LN2 cooling and one with heated target capability target holders one 8-position 2-inch wafer RT with clips to hold 6 pieces each position one 6-position 3-inch wafer LN2 or RT with clips to hold 4 pieces each position one 5-position 4-inch wafer LN2 or RT one 6-position 2-inch diameter RT custom with many clips one 1-position 3-inch wafer heated (300°C) one 1-position 1-inch wafer within black-body radiatively heated oven (500°C) one goniometer with x and y translation plus two directions of accurately controlled tilt for controlled angle implants or channeled implants (0°) and Rutherford backscattering analysis capability (custom made) various single-position research target holders, some with rotational capability to allow multiple fluence implants in a circle on a wafer, or to mount samples thick in the vertical direction one bin of RBS electronics, detectors, etc. heater power supplies, secondary particle suppression equipment, and temperature monitoring equipment for heated targets power supplies for the secondary particle suppression in the main target chamber secondary particle suppression lenses and apertures in all target chambers mechanical or powered slits for each beam line pneumatic or electromagnetic shutters for each beam line controlled both manually and electronically by the current integrator one vertical laminar flow hood for each target chamber one accelerator alignment mandrel teflon tubing for lines between gas manifold and HV terminal (replace when arc causes holes) dry box with load lock and pair(s) of chemically inert gloves for storing and loading ion source probes and ion source probe chemicals dry nitrogen or Ar gas flow and control system for above dry box supply of chemicals for ion source probe loading (see list below) supply of ion source probe tubes (quartz) (>100) dry box for storing ion sources dry N2 or Ar gas flow and control system for ion source storage box exhausted box for loading ion sources, containing work area for cleaning ion sources gas manifold with exhaust to store gas bottles for ion source (>12) gas manifold system with many valves to supply gases from storage box to ion source in HV terminal system of feed lines from gas storage box to HV terminal - inside a safety tube connected with the exhaust system computer for RBS and implantation range calculations computer for control system, if desired List of chemicals for ion source probes - to make ion beams of many elements – for storage in the dry box described above LiBr, BeCl2, NaBr, Mg, AlCl3, crystalline red P, crystalline yellow S (S is also stored in the gas manifold as CS2), KBr, Ca, ScCl3, TiC13, VCl2, CrCl2, MnCl2, FeC12, CoCl2, NiCl2, CuCl3, Zn, GaF3, Se, RbCl, Sr, YC13, ZrC14, NbCl5, MoC15, AgCl, Cd, InCl, SnCl2 or SnC14, Sb, Te, some iodide for I, CsCI, Ba, LaC13, all lanthanide rare earth chlorides (13), HfC14, TaC15, W from the ion source filament or from WF6, Hg, Tl, PbC12, Bi, ThCl4, UCl4 List of gases to be available in lecture bottles and with on/off and gas flow control valves, and stored in the gas manifold hood box described above (exhausted), located inside the high voltage terminal near the ion source (esp. SiF4): 1H2, 2H2, He, BF3, 12CO, 13CO, 14N2, 15 N2, 1602, 1802, Ne, SiF4, PF3, CS2, Ar, GeF4, AsF3, Kr, Xe