WASTE STRATEGY TASK AND FINISH GROUP MEETING NOTES 25TH MARCH 2010 Present: Mark Overton (MO), Chair Jan Jones, Secretary Jill Court (JC) Alex Khan (AK) Graham Moncur (GM) Karen Gallagher (KG) Nicola Baker (NB) Paul O’Callaghan (PO) Apologies received from Dr Stewart Barr (SB), Hugh McCann (HM) and Paul Grogan (PG), Gemma Richens (GR) and Lora Mihova (LM). Introduction Mark Overton welcomed everyone to the meeting. Terms of Reference The terms of reference were agreed with the inclusion of the following items: The group will meet monthly with the initial project being signed off by the end of July 2010, in time for the new academic year The strategy will cover a 5 year period (2010/11 – 2014/15) and include regular reviews KG will represent the key contact point for Procurement Services Action: KG to finalise the Terms of Reference of re-issue. Copies of the minutes to be sent to Gill Easton, Head of Academic Projects for information. Background of Waste and Recycling at the University. KG delivered a presentation outlining the background to the drivers for waste and recycling. A copy is appended to these minutes. MO emphasised the importance of legislative compliance and the link between waste / recycling performance with funding, etc. It was also noted that the cost of waste disposal at the University could be as much as a million pounds, which represents around 0.5% of the University’s total turnover. Development of a Waste and Recycling Strategy The aim of the strategy is to: Determine total waste costs Determine total waste arisings Understand current disposal routes Identify opportunities to reduce waste arisings, waste sent to landfill, promote reuse and increase recycling SUMMARY IT Equipment Academic Services dispose of IT for a small number of Schools. This uses the free DELL Service. DELL dispose of material via SIMMS waste. The biggest challenge to this disposal route is finding space to accommodate equipment awaiting collection. It was suggested a central collection scheme would be beneficial. PO is also evaluating another free IT collection service. Action: AK to contact School Computing Colleagues to ascertain current IT disposal routes, quantities generated and costs. Furniture Until recently all waste furniture was disposed of to landfill. PO has since indentified opportunities to re-use the equipment, in some cases via a third party. Cooking Oil Cooking oil was originally disposed of via a local company however following a Duty of Care check this has now ceased. At present Greenearth Biodiesel is collected the oil. In order to use this fuel for the University fleet, a small Intermediate Bulk Container with a pump will need to be installed on site. A student is currently evaluating the most economic and environmentally sound route for cooking oil disposal. The report is due at the end of April. Food Waste At present this is being collected by Biffa but there is a proposal to purchase an In-Vessel Composter. This is currently under negotiation. Construction Waste There is currently no information regarding the amount of construction waste generated by the University. KG highlighted that this is now a requirement of the HEFCE Estates Management Statistics. Action: HM to identify construction waste information currently held by EDS. Hazardous Waste There is currently no information regarding waste stream and quantities disposed off directly within academic areas. Action: KG to contact College Managers and Professional Service Managers to ascertain current disposal routes, quantities generated and costs. Residential Waste GR has contacted Geoff Pringle to request improvement in Halls of residencies recycling facilities. Action: NB to provide a summary of current facilities in halls of residencies. Other waste streams A large amount of data was collated by Tony Brown during his MSc Work Base Learning Project. Action: KG to prepare a list of data required for the next meeting Recycling Infrastructure KG reported that funding has been secured for internal recycling facilities via the Recyclezone scheme. This has been match funded by Jeremy Lindley. This scheme is dependent on the University adopting a segregate at source approach. KG highlighted the following benefits of this: Facilitates the adoption of free collection schemes and/or realise the value from waste streams Builds on existing infrastructure Lower contamination option as lower residual volumes and less disposed off via incineration (waste to energy plants) JC suggested that a mixed recyclates approach would be beneficial and this has been adopted by other Universities. KG stated that no funding was available at present for co-mingled recycling infrastructure. Action: SB to provide advice regarding the benefits of comingled recycling versus segregate at source. Post Meeting Note: A tour of the Manchester BIFFA Materials Recovery Facility (MRF). Storage The success of a furniture re-use scheme and other revenue generating projects will be dependent on the identification of a resource centre as outlined in the VCEG paper. Action: JC to identify opportunities for the resource centre location. Biffa Contract Despite problems with the contract there has been an improvement over the past 6 months. The Group requested information about opportunities available within the BIFFA contract to improve recycling. Action: KG to contact John Malloch regarding current position of the contract. Next Meeting JJ - Please include date and time Summary of Actions Action 1 Finalise Terms of Reference 2 Contact School computing colleagues to ascertain current IT disposal routes, quantities generated and costs 3 Identify construction waste information currently held by EDS 4 Contact College Managers and Professional Service Managers to ascertain current disposal routes, quantities generated and costs 5 Provide a summary of current facilities in halls of residencies 6 Prepare a list of waste data required 7 Provide advice regarding the benefits of co-mingled recycling versus segregate at source 8 Identify opportunities for the resource centre location. 9 Contact John Malloch regarding current position of the BIFFA contract Owner KG AK HM KG NB KG SB JC KG