Manchurian Crisis, 1931 first major failure of the League of Nations and first time the League was challenged by an aggressor attacking another nation Japan at this time was a nation that had fallen under the influence of its military, moved towards a fascist imperialist state Japan is close to China and is an island that needed resources and markets that could be found in Manchuria (northeastern China) China did nothing to Japan, a perfect example of a victim of aggression that the League was suppose to protect through the principle of collective security The League should have recommended moral sanctions be applied, then economic sanctions if that didn’t work, and, as a last resort, military sanctions to remove the aggressive Japanese forces which had created a puppet government named Manchukuo, controlled directly by Japan Each member nation should have contributed some troops to restore international order in the name of collective security Instead they sent out the Lytton Commission to study the cause of this conflict which decided that the Japanese action o o could not be regarded as a measures of legitimate self-defense that the regime which the Japanese had set up there disregarded the wishes of the people of Manchuria and was not compatible with the fundamental principles of existing international obligations this light criticism, was enough to anger Japan and they resigned from the League of Nations in 1933 Abyssinian Crisis, 1935-1936 Italy led by fascist dictator Mussolini at the time looked around and saw that one part of Africa called Ethiopia was unclaimed by a European power Mussolini attacked to make it part of the new Roman Empire Ethiopians cannot defend themselves because they were a third world underdeveloped country, while the Italians have a very modern military ideal example of what the League was meant to deal with: protect a victim nation from acts of aggression the League should have imposed all three sanctions to some degree they did just that they were able to pass a recommendation that Italy be morally condemned, however, this was Mussolini who would hardly be deterred by this type of label (he rejoiced at being at war) imposed economic sanctions but were very extremely weak economic sanctions and they did not include those necessities of war oil, copper and steel Mussolini stated had he been cut off from these necessities, he would have been forced to withdraw, he wasn’t, so he continued on completely conquering Ethiopia by 1936 Spanish Civil War, 1936-1939 this failure occurs marks the death of the League of Nations Spain, 1931, decides to become a republic and gets rid of their king holds democratic elections won by a coalition of socialists and communists known as the republicans in this war those people within Spain that are anti-left form their own coalition, following Franco Franco takes his nationalist, right wing supporters to Morocco to organize themselves In 1936, they invade Spain (their own country) which is against international law and order League of Nations should step in but it doesn't Mussolini in Italy sends over 60,000 troops to support the fascist right-wing, nationalist cause and allow the Italian troops to get training for the looming world war second fascist supporter is Hitler sends his air force (Luftwaffe) to Spain to support the same fascist cause and get some training for the same war on the left wing side Stalin sent over his tanks from the USSR, support the republican left wing, and to get some practice for the looming war the League of Nations should have taken action against Italy, Germany and the USSR all broke the main covenant and aim of the League of Nations: to respect the territorial integrity and independence of other nations