Academic Promotions Annex 2 SOAS, University of London Guidance on Teaching Evidence To evaluate that component of a promotion case dependent on assessment of teaching achievement, the School Promotions Panel will require evidence of the quality of achievement. Reference to this evidence should be submitted to the School Promotion Panel in a brief form as outlined in the Promotion Procedures and the Academic Promotion Form (APF1) available at http://www.soas.ac.uk/hr/procedures/reward/acaprom/ The value of having this Guidance is to make academics aware of the spectrum of teaching activities and forms of recognition that could contribute to a case for promotion. Promotion Procedures Teaching Criteria Academic staff may apply for promotion to Senior Lecturer, Reader or Professor and will be expected to have successfully performed the duties outlined in their current job description (Lecturer, Senior Lecturer/Reader) available at [Annex 1]. For purposes of promotion they will be assessed by reference to their scholarly and other contribution to the School as evidenced by: Teaching: Contribution to the advancement of a particular subject area by teaching, and by educational innovation where appropriate. The specific criteria for Senior Lecturer, Reader and Professor are as follows: Senior Lecturer: A prerequisite for promotion to Senior Lecturer is academic achievement in both research and teaching. Academic leadership and overall contribution to the work of a department, faculty and the School, including through enterprise activity, will also be taken into consideration. Reader: In considering a Lecturer or Senior Lecturer for the conferment of the title of Reader, regard shall be made to the person’s standing and promise in the relevant subject or profession as established by important contributions to its advancement through publications, creative work or other appropriate forms of scholarship or performance, and through teaching. Academic leadership and other contributions to the work of the School as above, the University, learned societies and other relevant bodies may also be taken into account. Professor: In considering a proposal for the conferment of the title of Professor regard shall be made to the person's international standing in the relevant subject or profession as established by outstanding contributions to its advancement through publications, creative work, or other appropriate forms of scholarship or performance, and through academic leadership, teaching and administration and other contributions to the work of the School as above. Guidance on Teaching Evidence – September 2014 -1- Academic Promotions Annex 2 Teaching Evidence Teaching Evidence may vary considerably from teacher to teacher and discipline to discipline. Nevertheless, there can be defined a short list of categories in which evidence could be required in a situation where assessment of performance is the issue. Such a list might look like: 1. Contributions to teaching and learning 2. Outcomes 3. Recognition Within these categories, there are many possible forms of evidence to attest to the excellence of teaching performance and academics will no doubt be creative in providing them. Obviously, the emphasis throughout should be on quality. A claim to performance at each level should be supported by reliable evidence and must include: student or alumni feedback on teaching; testimonials from external clients; and may include any of the following: data on completion rates and students' progression and attainment; evidence of a successful programme of continuing professional development, including the Academic Practice programme. The following is a list of examples within each of the above categories. It is completely open-ended, non-prescriptive and non-prioritised. It is given solely to stimulate creativity in providing evidence of achievement in teaching. 1 Contributions to teaching and learning a) Courses taught (undergraduate or postgraduate) (i) Title, level and nominal contact hours Average student numbers Years taught Course text (if any) Lecture, fieldwork, seminar, other Project, essays or dissertation required (ii) (b) Course details: Documentation produced for students: Course aims and objectives Supplementary material Coursework definition (e.g. problem papers, essay topics, etc.) Written examination papers, or other assessment papers General contributions (i) Innovation Guidance on Teaching Evidence – September 2014 -2- Academic Promotions Annex 2 In curriculum and/or course development In use of special teaching methods and/or special learning resources In assessment methodology (ii) Account of times teaching observed by peers and of peer observations done Account of quality assessment observations by external agencies Record of courses and conferences attended Involvement with teaching support activities Service as a teacher or facilitator in the local community Self-assessment of teaching performance (iii) 2 Self-improvement Teaching and learning research and development Involvement with local, national or international activity Research and development publications in the area of teaching and learning conference presentations Production of teaching materials, e.g. video tapes, learning packages Publication of textbooks Outcomes 3 Results from formal student evaluation questionnaires Results of student examinations or other assessments Products of student learning (publications, exhibitions, projects, etc.) Student progress (to advanced cognate courses, higher degrees) Recognition Appointment as convenor of course or programme Accreditation of courses by professional bodies Departmental leadership in teaching Membership of Faculty Teaching Committee or equivalent Receipt of awards for teaching Professional teaching qualifications achieved Provision of courses on teaching Providing mentorship to colleagues Acting as a Visiting Examiner at other Institutions Solicited authorship of texts or sections of text Editorship or referee for journals in area of teaching Fellowship of, and/or offices of responsibility in, relevant professional bodies Involvement with external quality audit or assessment Service as an advisor on teaching and learning in the local community Unsolicited written evidence (e.g. published reviews of textbooks) Documented opinion (e.g. published reviews) Relevant extracts from minutes of committees and/or working groups Receipt of grants for aspects of teaching and learning development Guidance on Teaching Evidence – September 2014 -3-