Horn: Researching and Writing Dissertations – Tutor notes CHAPTER 7 Methodology Chapter overview The chosen method for dissertation research is part of the important ‘backbone’ of the work. It must be connected to the literature section. It is essentially a method selection process. Once the method is selected, the student has to have enough information about it to carry it out effectively. This chapter aims to present a balance of quantitative and qualitative methods. What is covered in this chapter? The importance of explaining methodology, and its connection with epistemology How to critically evaluate methods in research The appropriate use of questionnaires and interviews A range of wider methods The usefulness of combining methods The role of sampling in research Ethical considerations in research Headline chapter points 7.2 METHODOLOGY AND EPISTEMOLOGY 7.3 SAMPLING CO NCEP TS 7.4 QUESTIONNAIRES THE APP RO PRI ATE USE O F Q UESTI O N N AI RES PRELI M I N ARY PO I N TS T O CO NS I DER M ETHO D O F ADM I NI STR ATI O N D AT A TY PES DEVI SI NG Q UES TI O NS DESI G N The wording of questions Types of question Likert scales The ideal length 7.5 INTERVIEWS THE SKI LLS REQ UI RED FO R I N TER VI EWI NG TY PES O F I N TER VI EW 7.6 COMMONLY-USED METHODS O BSERV ATI O N ETHNO G R AP HI C S TUDI ES REPE R TO RY G RI D TE CH N I Q UE DI ARI ES RELI VI NG AC TI O N RESE AR C H AN D P AR TI CI P AT O RY RESE AR C H RO LE- PL AY O R AL HI S TO R Y TE CHNI Q UES N ARR ATI VE R ESE ARCH 7.7 NOTES AND DEFINITIONS IN THE RESEARCH PROCESS 7.8 ETHICS Feedback on Activities None that require feedback in this chapter Feedback on Case study Petra To think about ... 1 Comment on how useful a survey will be in discovering the views of the departments. If you were to use a survey, would one survey be suitable for all departments? 2 What other stakeholders ought to be included in the research? 3 Prepare a one-page ‘action report’ for Jade setting out your proposed strategy for the research – a methods statement. Pay particular attention to Jade’s stated ne ed for the research to be ‘sound’. 4 Comment on whether your strategy can be developed and implemented without getting ‘bogged down in too much theory’. This case study encourages the student to investigate some of the issues involved with choosing a method to solve a research problem. Feedback: 1 The double question invites reflection on the nature of surveys and how they should reflect the concerns and issues of the participants. There is a debate continuum to engage with here between tightly-controlled questions that reflect the views of the researcher more than those of the participants, and loosely-structured interviews that directly elicit the perceptions of the participants but that will be difficult to analyse and relate to known theory. 2 This question invites thoughts about who has an interest in research and which groups should have participation in the research. Possible stakeholders include: the training providers senior management the departments who do not use the training – if not, why not? potential providers of training individuals who receive the training departmental managers the HR department. 3 This activity invites the student to progress beyond explaining the steps that would be needed to create a questionnaire and administer it. It requires students to address notions of: validity reliability ethics informed consent data protection secondary data theory and literature multiple methods participant validation of the collected data. 4 To be able to comment as requested, the student will have to understand that all research is embedded in views, beliefs, opinions and cultures. It is only by engaging in theoretical debate and grounding the research in known theory that any effective progress can be made. It would be particularly important to critically analyse and assimilate previous research. It could reasonably be expected that students would display a knowledge of the theory of evaluation, and the work of Kirkpatrick. Suggested pedagogical approach See lesson plan below Lesson plan Two hours 20 minutes’ (140-minute) teaching session, including one 15-minute break Total class time thus 125 minutes Within that, and additional to it, is an out-of-class activity, which might last 40 minutes 0–40 minutes LECTURE: Introduction to quantitative and qualitative methods. This would take a form appropriate to the types of research that your department normally engages in 40–50 minutes Q&A SESSION: Questions related to methods [40 minutes] OUT-OF-CLASS ACTIVITY: Research to firm up the method each individual will use and reaffirm the guiding theory. The intended output is a methods statement: ‘My research will use this method because …’ The lesson should then resume in-class 50–80 minutes FEEDBACK: Each group member presents his/her chosen method and the reasons behind that choice 80–110 minutes LECTURE: Issues to be considered as you progress your method (ethics, time, consent, validity, etc) 110–125 minutes SUMMARY AND ACTIONS: Summary of what has been covered, and action plans ACTION PLAN ITEMS Return next week with: – a detailed schedule for the conduct of the research – a list of unresolved issues around the method