Controls on the Stratigraphic record

advertisement

Controls on the Stratigraphic record

• Episodic sedimentation (Ager’s Catastrophic Uniformitarianism)

Correlation

• The nature of the control

Event stratigraphy

Sequence stratigraphy

Ager’s view of the record

More gaps than record

• Obvious unconformities

Variable thickness and “pinch outs” of like-aged strata in different locations

Incredibly slow estimates for accumulation rates

The myth of the type section

• The “true” nature of bedding surfaces: breaks in sedimentation, and thus unconformable surfaces!

Episodic sedimentation

• “Catastrophic Uniformitarianism”

Chance preservation

Cautions to keep in mind

• Ager’s bias

View from above base level

Predisposed to questions of preservation rather than depositional process

Worked during the beginning of the Plate Tectonics Revolution

Gaps in the record vary with

Environment

Process

• Age

Correlation

Early workers incorrectly viewed matching lithologies as equal in age

(“Layer cake thinkers”)

• Lithostratigraphic correlation - matching similarly placed formations in different sections (Result is almost always diacronous!)

• Temporal correlation - matching strata of equal ages in different sections

(Result almost always cuts across facies of lithologies!)

Methods of correlation

• “Walking the section”

Mapping sections

• Identification of marker beds

• Positional equivalence of differing facies

• Matching of unconformity surfaces or deformed and metamorphosed

formations

Correlation by positional equivalence

Vagaries and Limitations

• Boundary offsets (“State-line faults”)

• Stratigraphic cutoffs (arbitrary boundaries between units)

Diacronous Facies of the Devonian Catskill sequence

Diacronous facies and

Lateral migration

• Persian Gulf coast

• Coast of France

Sandy Hook, NJ

LI spit complex

Mississippi Delta

2 m/yr

10 m/yr

12 m/yr

65 m/yr

75 m/yr

Event correlation of transgressive/regressive inflections

Event stratigraphy and golden spikes

Ideal stratigraphic age markers are instaneous and global

Approximated by

• Ash falls

Impact events

Magnetic reversals

• Some evolutionary events

Transgression/regression inflection points

Records of certain climatic cycles

Capitalizing on gaps and diacronous facies

Unconformities can be viewed as natural breaks in the record

They separate packets of diacronous, transgressive/regressive sedimentary strata

• These define “Sequence” boundaries in the sense of Sloss et al.

(1949); Sloss (1963)

Many of these sequences are global in scale and may span

system boundaries

Sloss diagram for

North America

Sequence Stratigraphy

• Framework for division and understanding of the stratigraphic record

Concepts formulated by Peter Vail, Bilal Haq, and other.

• Formations can be grouped into “sequences” bounded by unconformities arising from global changes in sea level

These global eustatic changes in sea level occur on a variety of time-scale associated with specific processes

Pros and Cons of the approach

• Provides an overarching framework with which to approach the record

• Process based

Identification of truly global eustatic events can be challenging

• Conversion from relative to absolute

SL can be difficult

Inadequate time control can led to process related misconceptions

Nested cyclicity

Sequence approach postulates that global SL can changes on a variety of time scales in response to processes with different time constants

• Vail et al. (1977) and Haq et al. (1977) identified four orders of cycles

Other works have defined higher order cycles

Confusion arises because various scientists ascribe different time scales and processes to similarly named cycles

Sequence Stratigraphic cycles

First Order: 200-400 myr

Second Order:

Third Order:

Fourth Order:

Fifth Order:

Sixth Order:

10-100 myr

1-10 myr

200-500 kyr

20- 400 kyr

1-10 kyr

First Order Cycles

Equal to the Supercycles of Fischer (1981)

Duration: 200-400 m.y.

Hypothesized Cause:

Major eustatic cycles caused by the formation and breakup of supercontinents

First

Order

Cycles

Second Order Cycles

Equal to

Sequences of Sloss

Synthems of Chang (1975), Ramsbottom (1979)

Duration: 10-100 m.y.

Hypothesized Cause: Eustatic cycles induced by volume changes in global mid-ocean ridge system (mantle convection cycles?)

Changes in

Sea floor spreading

• Sea floor spreading rates can range from 1-12 cm/y resulting in large changes in ocean basin volume and continental flooding (example shows changes from 2 to 6 cm/yr

Third Order Cycles

Equal to Mesothems of Ramsbottom (1979)

Duration of 1-10 m.y.

Hypothesized Cause: Crustal flexures or changes in the Geoid

(regional uplift?)

Short duration relative to biostratigraphic contraints makes determing global extent and driving process difficult

Fourth Order Cycles

Cyclothems of Wanless and Weller (1932)

Duration of 200-500 k.y.

Hypothesized Cause: Eustatic changes driven by growth and decay of ice sheets; growth and abandonment of deltas

Problem - While there is a 400 ka cycle associated with the

Pleistocene ice ages, it has no eustatic expression!

Fifth and Sixth Order Cycles

• Orbital, or Croll/Milankovitch cycles

• Eccentricity: 95, 125, 400 kyr

Tilt: 41 kyr

• Precession: 19, 23 kyr

• Sub-Orbital:1-10 kyr

• Cause still active area of research

Download