Supplementary Information A unique aptamer-drug conjugate for targeted therapy of multiple myeloma Jianguo Wen,1 Wenjing Tao,2 Suyang Hao,1 Swaminathan P. Iyer, 3 Youli Zu1* Supplementary Figure 1: CD38 is a specific biomarker for clinical diagnosis of MM cells. (A) Marrow mononuclear cells of MM patients were stained with anti-CD38 antibody and analyzed by flow cytometry. MM cells expressed the highest level of CD38, although weak expression was seen in other cell populations, including a subset of activated T lymphocytes, monocytes, and blasts. (B) Tissue immunohistochemical stains reveal that CD138 is less specific since it expresses in plasma cells as well as normal epithelial cells. Page 1 of 7 Supplementary Figure 2: Identification of MM cell-targeted and CD38-specific ssDNA aptamer sequences. (A) For this purpose, we conducted a hybrid aptamer selection approach utilizing 15 rounds of MM cell-based SELEX and 5 rounds of CD38 protein-based SELEX. The resultant ssDNA aptamer pool was analyzed by next-generation sequencing with a total of 19,750,380 reads. (B) The top 20 aptamer sequences were analyzed using ClustalX software to generate a phylogenetic tree, and clustered into three groups that shared a high degree of structural similarity (groups A, B, and C). Among them, two dominant aptamer sequences, aptamer #1 and aptamer #2 were identified, accounting for 20% and 19% of total sequence reads, respectively (marked in red). (C) Aptamers in each group have very similar sequences, such as the single-nucleotide differences seen between pairs #1 and #4, #2 and 8#, or #7 and #19. Page 2 of 7 Supplementary Figure 3: Cell binding affinity and specificity of aptamer sequences. (A) Representative aptamer sequences from each group, aptamers #1, #2, and #7, were synthesized and conjugated with a Cy3 fluorochrome reporter. Synthetic aptamers were incubated with cultured MM cells (MM1S) and CD38-negative control cells (HDLM2) and resultant cell binding was quantified by flow cytometry. An anti-CD38 antibody was used as a standard control. Aptamer #1 showed the highest binding affinity and specificity. (B) Predicted secondary structures of synthetic aptamers. (C) Affinity and specificity of synthetic aptamer #1 was further confirmed in additional MM cells (RPMI8226 and NCIH929) and CD38-negative control cells (K299 and Jeko1). Page 3 of 7 Supplementary Figure 4: The ssDNA aptamer sequence iss both MM cell-selective and CD38 protein-specific. (A) The CD38-specific aptamer #1 was truncated based on its functional structure (#1S) and core sequence. Cell binding of aptamers was determined using MM cells (MM1S) and CD38negative cells (HDLM2), with anti-CD38 antibody as a standard control. The apparent dissociation constants (Kd) were measured by flow cytometry. (B) Cell binding of synthetic aptamer #1S was determined using MM cells (RPMI8226 and NCI-H929) and CD38-negative cells (K299 and Jeko1). (C) Cell lysates of MM1S and HDLM2 were immunoprecipitated with aptamers #1 and #1S, and resultant proteins were analyzed by western immunoblotting using anti-CD38 antibody. -actin was used as a protein loading control. (D) RPMI8226 cells were transfected with CD38-specific siRNA to silence the CD38 gene, or scrambled siRNA as a control (Scr siRNA). Down-regulation of cellular CD38 expression was evaluated 48 hours post-transfection by flow cytometry with anti-CD38 antibody, and Aptamers #1 and #1S. (E) Selective cell binding and intracellular delivery of aptamer #1S occurred in a mixture of MM1S cells (CD38+), but not HDLM2 cells (CD38-). All data are representative at least of three independent experiments. Page 4 of 7 Supplementary Figure 5: Synthetic ssDNA aptamers are biostable and selectively targeted MM tumors in vivo. (A) ssDNA aptamer #1S and a control RNA aptamer were incubated in human serum and their biostability was evaluated by gel electrophoresis of residual products at the indicated time points. (B) Animal models bearing both a luciferase-tagged MM tumor (RPMI8226) and a CD38-negative tumor (K299 lymphoma) were systemically administered with Cy5.5-labeled aptamer #1S through tail veins. Tumor development was monitored by bioluminescence image scans and aptamer signals were detected by fluorescence imaging with the Cy5.5 channel. All data are representative at least of three independent experiments. Page 5 of 7 Supplementary Figure 6: Formulation of ApDC with a CG-cargo sequence for high drug payload and a pH-controlled structural switching mechanism for rapid drug release. (A) Schematic diagram of ApDC formulation. (B) For drug loading, aptamer/CG-cargo structures were incubated with free DOX at several molar ratios. Since free DOX is fluorescent (OD590) and its intercalated form is optically silent, the DOX incorporation capacity of ApDC was determined by monitoring fluorescence resulting from leftover unconjugated free DOX. Each aptamer/CG-cargo structure completely incorporated up to 5 DOX molecules, a molar ratio of 1:5. (C) Synthetic aptamers alone and CG-cargo sequences alone were also incubated with DOX and their drug loading capacities were evaluated. Changes in free DOX fluorescence indicated that an intact aptamer/CG-cargo structure was indispensable for incorporating a full DOX payload. (D) To confirm the presence of high DOX payload, ApDC was digested by DNase and the released free DOX was monitored by fluorescence changes. (E) For stability assays, ApDC was incubated at different temperatures and DOX release was monitored. (F) ApDC was stable in human serum and carried more than 60% of DOX payload post-24 h incubation. (G) To test pH-controlled drug release, ApDC was incubated in medium at pHs ranging from 7.4 to 1.0 for 30 min and released free DOX in each reaction was monitored by fluorescence changes. Complete release of DOX payload from ApDC was observed when the pH reached ≤5.0. All data are representative at least of three independent experiments with mean ± SD. Page 6 of 7 Supplementary Figure 7: ApDC selectively targets patient MM cells with little to no effects on normal marrow cells. (A) Flow cytometry analysis revealed that MM cells in patient marrow specimens could be distinguished by high levels of CD38 and CD138 expression. (B) To isolate primary MM cells, patient marrow cells were stained with anti-CD138 antibody and primary CD138-positive MM cells and CD138-negative background marrow cells were sorted (center diagram). Cell separation was confirmed by flow cytometry analysis (scatter plots on both sides). (C) Primary MM cells isolated from individual patients were treated with equal molar amounts of aptamers, free DOX, or ApDC and apoptosis was determined by flow cytometry with Annexin V stain (left panel). Summary results from 4 patients are shown as mean ± SD on the right. *P < 0.01. Page 7 of 7