ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
First spinosaurid dinosaur from Australia and the cosmopolitanism of Cretaceous dinosaur
faunas
Paul M. Barrett1,*, Roger B. J. Benson2, Thomas H. Rich3,4 and Patricia Vickers-Rich3,4
1
Department of Palaeontology, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK;
2
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB3 3EQ,
UK; 3Palaeontology Department, Museum Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia; 4School of
Geosciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
*Corresponding author (p.barrett@nhm.ac.uk)
Description of NMV 221081
NMV P221081 is a partial cervical vertebra comprising the centrum and left side of the neural arch
(Figs 1, S1). The suture between the neural arch and centrum is clearly visible, suggesting that the
vertebra pertains to a juvenile individual [1]. The neural spine and both postzygapophyses are
missing, but the preserved part of the vertebra is generally well-preserved and only slightly
distorted.
Figure S1. Spinosaurid vertebra NMV P221081 in anterior (a, cast), left lateral (b, cast), dorsal (c, cast), posterior (d)
right lateral (e, g), and ventral (f) views, including magnification of the right pneumatic foramen (‘pleurocoel’) (g).
Images of casts are included to highlight particular features that are otherwise difficult to image from the original
specimen due to poor contrast.
The centrum is strongly opisthocoelous, with a ball-shaped anterior articular surface and a deeply
excavated posterior surface. This condition is present in most allosauroids and megalosauroids, the
small coelurosaur Compsognathus, and some alvarezsaurids [2–5]. NMV P221081 differs from most
theropods, in which the anterior surface of the centrum is weakly concave [3]. It also differs from
many ceratosaurs, tyrannosauroids, Piatnitzkysaurus and Condorraptor, in which the anterior
surface is flat [3, 6–7]. Compsognathus and alvarezsaurids that possess similar cervical vertebrae to
NMV P221081 are small-bodied taxa, with cervical vertebrae that are much smaller than NMV
P221081 [2, 8]. This is especially significant given the juvenile status of NMV P221081. Perhaps
more importantly, however, alvarezsaurids and Compsognathus show detailed anatomical
differences from NMV P221081, which preclude a close relationship. Alvarezsaurid cervical
vertebrae possess several derived features that are not present in NMV P221081 (e.g. carotid
processes: ref. 2). Compsognathus cervical vertebrae are considerably more anteroposteriorly
elongated (>3·0 times the dorsoventral height) than those of NMV P221081, and lack the detailed
similarities shared by NMV P221081 and spinosaurids [8]. NMV P221081 has a maximum
anteroposterior length (excluding the anterior articular ball) that is approximately 2·0 times the
dorsoventral height of the posterior articular surface. Although this is short when compared to
Compsognathus, it is long in comparison to most allosauroids and megalosauroids, among which the
longest cervical centra are only slightly longer anteroposteriorly than high dorsoventrally [3, 7, 9–
10]. The only exception to this among allosauroids and megalosauroids is in spinosaurid
megalosauroids (e.g. Fig. 1). Among allosauroids, Carcharodontosaurus has the proportionally
longest cervical centra. These are 1·5 times as long anteroposteriorly as they are high dorsoventrally
(ref. 4: anteroposterior measurement excluding the convex anterior surface), substantially less than
the ratio in NMV P221081 (2·0). Furthermore, this 'elongate' ratio in Carcharodontosaurus arises
from a proportional decrease in height rather than genuine elongation: the centrum has
dorsoventrally compressed proportions and is 1·8 times as wide mediolaterally as it is high
dorsoventrally. This does not occur in NMV P221081. Furthermore, derived carcharodontosaurids
such as Carcharodontosaurus lack substantial dorsoventral offset between the articular surfaces of
the centrum [4], also unlike NMV P221081 and spinosaurids (Figs 1, S1b).
In NMV P221081 the lateral surfaces of the centrum are mildly concave, both
anteroposteriorly and dorsoventrally, and a strong ridge separates the lateral and ventral surfaces. A
small pneumatic foramen (‘pleurocoel’) is positioned in the anterior third of the lateral surface. The
presence of a single, anterior pleurocoel is a tetanuran synapomorphy [3, 5]. Most non-tetanuran
theropods also possess a posterior pleurocoel [11], although the possible coelophysoid Liliensternus
is an exception [3]. The pleurocoel of NMV P221081 has an elliptical outline, with the long axis of
the ellipse oriented anterodorsally. This foramen is partially obscured by the diapophysis in lateral
view and is therefore only fully visible in lateral view on the right side (which is missing the
diapophysis), or in ventrolateral or posterolateral views on the left side. It is subdivided into two
unequal portions by a vertical lamina (Fig. S1g). The anterior portion is extremely small on the left
side. This condition is also present in some vertebrae of the spinosaurid Baryonyx walkeri (Fig. 1h–
i), but has not been seen in any other theropod by any of the authors. Although the anterior
pleurocoel is also subdivided in some of the cervical vertebrae of carcharodontosaurian allosauroids
[9–10, 12], this is achieved by a massive, buttress that effectively results in the formation of two
anterior pleurocoels and is substantially different to the situation in NMV P221081. The prominent
parapophysis of NMV P221081 is located anteroventrally on the lateral surface of the centrum,
immediately anteroventral to the pleurocoel. The articular surface of the parapophysis is concave
and the long axis of this surface is oriented anteroposteriorly. The degree of elongation of the
centrum suggests that this is a middle or posterior cervical vertebra, potentially cervical 7 or 8.
Indeed, the vertebra is almost identical to cervical 8 of Baryonyx walkeri (Fig. 1a–g) and shares the
same character states if scored for a phylogenetic analysis [5].
In ventral view, the centrum is widest anteriorly, at a point level with the parapophyses. It
constricts in width posteriorly before expanding again to form the posterior articular surface. The
ventral surface is concave anteriorly, but flattens posteriorly. A short longitudinal ridge occupies the
centre of the anteroventral concavity. The neural canal is visible in dorsal view, due to the
disarticulation and partial breakage of the neural arch. A narrow, longitudinal groove extends along
the centre of the neural canal incising the dorsal surface of the centrum. The articular surface for the
right side of the neural arch is also exposed in dorsal view. It has a roughened texture, as would be
expected if the neural arch were unfused to the centrum (see above). Broken areas on the ventral
surface of the centrum reveal that the interior is composed of relatively large internal spaces that
may be marrow cavities or large pneumatic chambers (camerae). The interior of the neural arch is
composed of compact bone. A highly divided, ‘honey-comb like’ network of small pneumatic
spaces (camellae) is absent. This absence precludes referral to Ceratosauria, Carcharodontosauria
and most coelurosaurian clades, which have a camellate internal pneumatic structure that is often
clearly visible in broken vertebrae [10, 13–14]. The absence of camellae in NMV P221081 is
corroborated by the relatively thick external walls of the bone; camellate bones have extremely thin
external walls [13]. The presence/absence of this feature cannot be linked to ontogenetic status of
the animal (RBJB, pers. obs. on numerous theropod specimens).
The preserved left prezygapophysis is distant from the midline, indicating that the
prezygapophyses were widely-spaced, as in tetanurans [3] and some abelisauroids [15], but unlike
most non-tetanuran theropods, in which the space between the prezygapophyses is narrower than the
neural canal [3]. In lateral view, the prezygapophysis is elongate and possesses a convex
dorsolateral surface that flattens posteriorly as it merges with the base of the diapophysis. A welldeveloped prezygodiapophyseal lamina (prdl: terminology following ref. 16) links these two
structures. The articular surface of the prezygapophysis is flat and subovate in medial view: this
surface is steeply inclined so that it is oriented at an angle of approximately 80 degrees to the
horizontal in anterior view. The diapophysis extends ventrolaterally and forms a triangular sheet in
dorsal view: the tip of the diapophysis is missing. A short, but robust posterior centrodiapophyseal
lamina (pcdl) is present. The anterior centrodiapophyseal lamina (acdl) is reduced to a very short
thin ridge that is only visible in ventral view. Although the postzygapophysis is missing, the base of
an extensive postzygodiapophyseal lamina (podl) is present. The pcdl and podl define a deep
triangular infrapostzygapophyseal fossa on the lateral surface of the neural arch. This extends
dorsomedially into the body of the neural arch and is exposed where the arch is broken dorsally
(Fig. S1c). This morphology is consistent with the camerate pneumatic architecture described above,
as taxa with camellate internal architecture often have shallower fossae that produce distinct
foramina of small or large size that enter into the bone. These foramina are absent in NMV
P221081. A stout lamina extends dorsally from the anterodorsolateral corner of the centrum and
contacts the prdl at a point approximately halfway between the prezygapophysis and diapophysis,
and the remains of a second lamina extends from the same point of origin to a position on the medial
surface of the prezygapophysis closes to its base. Taken together, these laminae may represent parts
of a bifurcated centroprezygapophyseal lamina (cpzl).
Measurements of NMV P221081
Maximum anteroposterior length of centrum = 42 mm
Maximum mediolateral width of anterior articular surface (including parapophyses) = 18 mm
Maximum mediolateral width of posterior articular surface = 12 mm
Maximum dorsoventral height of posterior articular surface = 17 mm
Similarity Indices
Agnolin et al. [17] used Sorensen’s Similarity Index (SSI) to assess the similarity of Cretaceous
dinosaur faunas in terms of the presence/absence of shared taxa. This index can be expressed as:
SSI = 2a/(2a + b + c)
where ‘a’ equals the number of taxa that are common to two faunas, ‘b’ equals the number of taxa
present in fauna A, but absent from fauna B, and ‘c’ equals the number of taxa present in fauna B,
but which are absent from fauna A. This equation produces a number between 0 and 1, where 1
indicates perfect similarity. This measure is widely used in community ecology [18], but is not
particularly appropriate for palaeobiogeographical analyses (see main text: some of these points are
expanded upon below). Nevertheless, we used this method to investigate the effects of
including/excluding taxa based on the addition of new material and a reinterpretation of some of the
data presented in the analyses of Agnolin et al. [17] in order to explore their results. The original
results clearly favour close similarity between South America and Australia to the definite exclusion
of biogeographical relationships with Laurasian continents [17].
Following the work presented herein, spinosaurids were added to the faunal list for the
Australian Cretaceous provided in ref. 17, and tyrannosauroids were also added [19]. Several other
changes were made to the faunal lists presented in ref. 17 to bring them into line with more
specialist taxonomic reviews, correcting several errors in the original analysis. In our analysis
(presented below), stegosaurs are coded as absent from both North and South America [20],
ankylosaurs are coded as absent from Africa and India [21], pachycephalosaurs are coded as absent
from Europe [22], abelisauroids are coded as absent from Australia [5, 23], and diplodocids are
coded as absent from the Cretaceous [24]. In addition, we added the presence of spinosauroids to
Asia (on the basis of unnamed material from Thailand and China: ref. 25) and the presence of
styracosternans to Africa (on the basis of Ouranosaurus and Lurdusaurus, which are both members
of this clade: phylogeny in ref. 26). This produces the following distribution of taxa (Table S1) and
the resultant SSIs (Table S2).
Table S1. Modified presence/absence data for Cretaceous dinosaur faunas, based on ref. 17 with the additions and
deletions mentioned in the text. Additions of taxa to the Agnolin et al. dataset are shown as a bold red cross; deletions as
bold red zeros. Abbreviations: Af, Africa; An, Antarctica; As, Asia; Au, Australia; Eu, Europe; In, India; Ma,
Madagascar; NA, North America; SA, South America.
NA
As
Eu
SA
An
Af
Ma
In
Au
Tyrannosauroidea
X
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
X
Ornithomimosauria
X
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
-
Therizinosauroidea
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Oviraptorosauria
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Alvarezsauridae
X
X
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
Troodontidae
X
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
-
Dromaeosauridae
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-
X
Abelisauroidea
-
-
X
X
-
X
X
X
0
Spinosauroidea
-
X
X
X
-
X
-
-
X
Neovenatoridae
-
X
X
X
-
-
-
-
X
Carcharodontosauridae
X
X
-
X
-
X
-
-
-
Rebbachisauridae
-
-
X
X
-
X
-
-
-
Dicraeosauridae
-
-
-
X
-
X
-
-
-
Titanosauria
X
X
X
X
-
X
X
X
X
Stegosauria
0
X
X
0
-
X
-
-
-
Ankylosauria
X
X
X
X
X
0
-
0
X
Basal Ornithopoda
X
X
X
X
X
X
-
-
X
Styracosterna
X
X
X
X
X
X
-
-
X
Pachycephalosauria
X
X
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ceratopsia
X
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
-
Table S2. SSIs for Cretaceous dinosaur faunas calculated on the basis of the modified presence/absence data provided in
ref. 17 (see Table S1). ‘a’ equals taxa shared between the two continents; ‘b’ equals taxa unique to Australia; ‘c’ equals
taxa unique to the other continent.
Continent
2a
b
c
SSI
North America
12
2
9
0·55
Asia
16
0
9
0·67
Europe
16
0
8
0·70
South America
14
1
5
0·70
Antarctica
8
4
0
0·67
Africa
10
3
6
0·52
Madagascar
4
6
1
0·36
India
2
7
1
0·20
Although South American faunas are recovered as similar to those of Australia (as concluded
in ref. 17), it is noteworthy that the SSI for Europe is indistinguishable from that for South America,
and that obtained for Asia is also similar. All SSIs for comparisons between Australia and Laurasian
continents increase relative to the values obtained in ref. 17 following these minor changes (also
helping to demonstrate the sensitivity of this index to issues of taxon sampling: see main text),
whereas values for most Gondwanan continents (India, Africa, Antarctica and Madagascar) are
reduced.
Following this analysis, we restricted comparisons to taxa of Early–‘middle’ Cretaceous age
(Neocomian and Gallic in old stratigraphic nomenclature, comprising the Berriasian to Turonian
stages), in order to exclude taxa known only from the Late Cretaceous and thereby make
comparisons between the late Early Cretaceous Australian fauna and those from elsewhere more
relevant. Unfortunately, this precludes comparisons between Australia and several Gondwanan
continents (Antarctica, India and Madagascar), as these lack dinosaur faunas of appropriate age [27].
Similarly, this led to the exclusion of pachycephalosaurs from the analysis, as their entire record
post-dates the Turonian stage [28]. The restricted version of the dataset is presented in Table S3 and
the results of the new analyses are in Table S4.
Table S3. Presence/absence data for Early to ‘middle’ Cretaceous dinosaur faunas, based the data presented in Table S1,
pruned to exclude areas and taxa not present in these time slices (see text). Abbreviations: Af, Africa; As, Asia; Au,
Australia; Eu, Europe; NA, North America; SA, South America. Changes to the original matrix in ref. 17 shown in bold
red type.
NA
As
Eu
SA
Af
Au
Tyrannosauroidea
X
X
X
-
-
X
Ornithomimosauria
X
X
X
-
-
-
Therizinosauroidea
X
X
-
-
-
-
Oviraptorosauria
X
X
-
-
-
-
Troodontidae
X
X
X
-
-
-
Dromaeosauridae
X
X
X
X
X
X
Abelisauroidea
-
-
X
X
X
0
Spinosauroidea
-
X
X
X
X
X
Neovenatoridae
-
X
X
X
-
X
Carcharodontosauridae
X
X
-
X
X
-
Rebbachisauridae
-
-
X
X
X
-
Dicraeosauridae
-
-
-
X
X
-
Titanosauria
X
X
X
X
X
X
Stegosauria
0
X
X
0
X
-
Ankylosauria
X
X
X
-
-
X
Basal Ornithopoda
X
X
X
X
X
X
Styracosterna
X
X
X
X
X
X
Ceratopsia
X
X
-
-
-
-
Table S4. SSIs for Early to ‘middle’ Cretaceous dinosaur faunas calculated on the basis of the pruned dataset presented
in Table S3. ‘a’ equals taxa shared between the two continents; ‘b’ equals taxa unique to Australia; ‘c’ equals taxa
unique to the other continent.
Continent
2a
b
c
SSI
North America
12
2
6
0·60
Asia
16
0
6
0·73
Europe
16
0
5
0·76
South America
12
2
4
0·67
Africa
10
3
5
0·56
Analysis of this restricted dataset underscores the strong similarities between the Early–
‘middle’ Cretaceous faunas of Australia and those of Laurasian continents (see main text). In
addition, several other dinosaur clades have been proposed as members of the Early Cretaceous
Australian dinosaur fauna, including oviraptorosaurian and ornithomimosaurian theropods [29–30]
and the possible ceratopsian Serendipaceratops [29, 31]. The systematics of these specimens were
disputed in ref. 17, and they were not included in either the SSI analyses presented by these authors,
or in the modified versions of these analyses that are presented above. Discussion of the affinities of
these specimens lies outside of the scope of this paper and will be addressed elsewhere (RBJB,
THV, PV-R and others, in preparation), but it should be noted that the Australian oviraptorosaur,
ornithomimosaur and ceratopsian were identified as a dromaeosaurid, ?unenlagiinine dromaesaurid
and an indeterminate ornithischian, respectively, in ref. 17. However, if the presence of either an
oviraptorosaur, ornithomimosaur or ceratopsian is confirmed in Australia, each of them would lead
to an increase in the SSI values obtained from comparisons between the Australian biota and those
from North America, Europe and Asia: the converse would be true for the SSI values obtained from
comparisons with Gondwanan continents.
References
1 Varricchio, D. J. 1997 Growth and embryology. In Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs (eds P. J. Currie &
K. Padian), pp. 282–288. San Diego, United States: Academic Press.
2 Chiappe, L. M., Norell, M. A. & Clark, J. M. 2002 The Cretaceous, short-armed Alvarezsauridae.
In Mesozoic Birds (eds L. M. Chiappe & L. M. Witmer), pp 87–120. Berkeley, United States:
University of California Press.
3 Rauhut, O. W. M. 2003. The interrelationships and evolution of basal theropod dinosaurs. Spec.
Pap. Palaeontol. 69, 1–213.
4 Brusatte, S. L. & Sereno P. C. 2007 A new species of Carcharodontosaurus (Dinosauria:
Theropoda) from the Cenomanian of Niger and a revision of the genus. J. Vert. Paleontol. 27,
902–916.
5 Benson, R. B. J., Carrano, M. T. & Brusatte, S. L. 2010 A new clade of archaic large-bodied
predatory dinosaurs (Theropoda: Allosauroidea) that survived to the latest Mesozoic.
Naturwissenschaften 97, 71–78 (doi: 10.1007/s00114-009-0614-x).
6 Brochu, C. A. 2002 Osteology of Tyrannosaurus rex: insights from a nearly complete skeleton and
high-resolution computed tomographic analysis of the skull. Mem. Soc. Vert. Paleontol. 7, 1–138.
7 Rauhut, O. W. M. 2005. Osteology and relationships of a new theropod dinosaur from the Middle
Jurassic of Patagonia. Palaeontology 48, 87–110.
8 Peyer, K. 2006 A reconsideration of Compsognathus from the Upper Tithonian of Canjeurs,
southeastern France. J. Vert. Paleontol. 26, 879–896.
9 Harris, J. D. 1998 Reanalysis of Acrocanthosaurus atokensis, its phylogenetic status and
implications, based on a new specimen. Bull. New Mexico Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. 13, 1–75.
10 Brusatte, S. L., Benson, R. B. J. & Hutt, S. 2008 The osteology of Neovenator salerii
(Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Wealden Group (Barremian) of the Isle of Wight. Palaeontol.
Soc. Monographs 162(631), 1–75.
11 Tykoski, R. S. & Rowe, T. 2004 Ceratosauria. In The Dinosauria (2nd Edition) (eds D. B.
Weishampel, P. Dodson & H. Osmólska), pp. 47–70. Berkeley, United States: University of
California Press.
12 Smith, N. D., Makovicky, P. J., Hammer, W. R. & Currie, P. J. 2007 Osteology of
Cryolophosaurus ellioti (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Early Jurassic of Antarctica and
implications for early theropod evolution. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 151, 377–421.
13 Britt, B. B. 1993 Pneumatic postcranial bones in dinosaurs and other archosaurs. PhD thesis,
University of Calgary.
14 Sues, H.-D. 1997 On Chirostenotes, a Late Cretaceous oviraptorosaur (Dinosauria: Theropoda)
from western North America. J. Vert. Paleontol. 17, 698–716.
15 O’Connor, P. M. 2007 The postcranial axial skeleton of Majungasaurus crenatissimus
(Theropoda: Abelisauridae) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Mem. Soc. Vert. Paleontol.
8, 127–162.
16 Wilson, J. A. 1999 A nomenclature for vertebral laminae in sauropods and other saurischian
dinosaurs. J. Vert. Paleontol. 19, 639–653.
17 Agnolin, F. L., Ezcurra, M. D., Pais, D. F. & Salisbury, S. W. 2010 A reappraisal of the
Cretaceous non-avian dinosaur faunas from Australia and New Zealand: evidence of their
Gondwanan affinities. J. Syst. Palaeont. 8, 257–300 (doi: 10.1080/14772011003594870).
18 Krebs, C. J. 1998 Ecological Methodology. Menlo Park, United States: Benjamin Cummings.
19 Benson, R. B. J., Barrett, P. M., Rich, T. H. & Vickers-Rich, P. 2010 A southern tyrant reptile.
Science 327, 1613 (doi: 10.1126/science.1187456).
20 Maidment, S. C. R., Norman, D. B., Barrett, P. M. & Upchurch, P. 2008 Systematics and
phylogeny of Stegosauria (Dinosauria: Ornithischia). J. Syst. Palaeont. 6, 367–407 (doi:10:1017/
S1477201908002459).
21 Carrano, M. T. & Sampson, S. D. 2008 The phylogeny of Ceratosauria (Dinosauria: Theropoda).
J. Syst. Palaeont. 6, 183–236 (doi:10.1017/S1477201907002246C).
22 Butler, R. J. & Sullivan, R. M. 2009 The phylogenetic position of the ornithischian dinosaur
Stenopelix valdensis from the Lower Cretaceous of Germany and the early fossil record of
Pachycephalosauria. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 54, 21–34.
23 Hocknull, S. A., White, M. A., Tischler, T. R., Cook, A. G., Calleja, N. D., Sloan, T. & Elliot, D.
A. 2009 New mid-Cretaceous (latest Albian) dinosaurs from Winton, Queensland, Australia.
PLoS One 4(7), e6190 (doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006190).
24 Whitlock, J. A. In press. A phylogenetic analysis of Diplodocoidea (Saurischia: Sauropoda).
Zool. J. Linn. Soc. (doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2010.00665.x)
25 Buffetaut, E., Suteethorn, V., Tong, H. & Amiot, R. 2008 An Early Cretaceous spinosaurid
theropod dinosaur from China. Geol. Mag. 145, 745–748 (doi:10.1017/S0016756808005360).
26 McDonald, A. T., Barrett, P. M. & Chapman, S. D. 2010 A new basal iguanodont (Dinosauria:
Ornithischia) from the Wealden (Lower Cretaceous) of England. Zootaxa 2569, 1–43.
27 Weishampel, D. B., Barrett, P. M., Coria, R. A., Le Loeuff, J., Xu, X., Zhao, X.-J., Sahni, A.,
Gomani, E. M. P. & Noto, C. R. 2004 Dinosaur distribution. In The Dinosauria (2nd Edition) (eds
D. B. Weishampel, P. Dodson & H. Osmólska), pp. 517–606. Berkeley, United States: University
of California Press.
28 Maryanska, T., Chapman, R. E. & Weishampel, D. B. 2004. Pachycephalosauria. In The
Dinosauria (2nd Edition) (eds D. B. Weishampel, P. Dodson & H. Osmólska), pp. 47–70.
Berkeley, United States: University of California Press.
29 Rich, T. H. & Vickers-Rich, P. 1994 Neoceratopsians and ornithomimosaurs: dinosaurs of
Gondwana origin? Research and Exploration 10, 129–131.
30 Currie, P. J., Vickers-Rich, P. & Rich, T. H. 1996 Possible oviraptorosaur (Theropoda,
Dinosauria) specimens from the Early Cretaceous Otway Group of Dinosaur Cove, Australia.
Alcheringa 20, 73–79.
31 Rich, T. H. & Vickers-Rich, P. 2003 Protoceratopsian? Ulnae from Australia. Rec. Queen Vic.
Mus. 113, 1–12.