The Western scholars have not only bungled facts & tampered with texts, they even went
on hurling abuse at our ancient historians & sages.
Long Before Kota Venkatachelam, Prof.M.Troyer raised his voice of protest against
modern historians. Mr.T.S.Narayana Sastry also was another.
Chandragupta Maurya lived in 1534 BC but was brought down to 323 BC to coincide with Alexander of 326
BC.This is the faking of Indian history
It was Gupta Chandragupta who was contemporary of Alexander and not Maurya
Chandragupta. Max Muller did this to suit Greek chronology.
Jones was determined to reduce the antiquity of Indian history. He fixed the chronology of the different
dynasties in an arbitrary way.
Prof.M.Troyar who translated Kalhana's Rajatarangini pointed out the necessity to follow Yudhishtira era of
3138 BC (contd.)
Prof.M.Troyar insisted on identifying Alexander's Chandragupta with Gupta Chandragupta but in vain.
Kota Venkatachalam collected astronomical evidence in support of Kali Era.
Kota Venkatachalam exposed the reasons that prompted the Western scholars to discard puranic
chronology and the Kali Era of 3102 BC.
The antiquity of Indian history was reduced by 12 centuries by identitying Chandragupta Maurya of 1534 BC
with Gupta Chandragupta of 323 BC.
Prof. Max Muller's plan was to reduce Indian chronology to suit Greek chronology.
We get the Aihole inscription of Pulekesin II mentioning Yudhishtira Saka of 3109 BC
and Saka Era of 550 BC.
Ravi Kirthi built a Jain temple in 5 BC & both Kalidasa & Bharavi must have lived
before that date in 57 BC during Vikramaditya's time.
Reigning periods of 3 contemporary kingdoms of Nepal, Magadha and Kashmir refer to
Kali Era of 3102 BC & Mahabharata war of 3138 BC.
Even Jones had given the chronology of dynasties till end of Ashoka as given in
Bhagavata PuraNa. But he did not adopt in toto.
It is our duty as a Hindu to rescue our history from the distortions & rape committed by
the colonialists & their neo-colonial successors.
The overthrow of this alien rule & banning this Congi hoodlums from Bharatvarsha is
first priority in rescuing ourselves as historical people.
India has sufficient historical evidence in the following 12 records. 1) Vishnu Purana 4th
Amsa. 2) Bhavishyothara Purana 3) Kaliyuga Raja Vrintanta (giving a fairly detailed account of
Andhra and subsequent Gupta dynasty), 4) Rajatarangini of Kalhana (contd.) 5) Cutch-nama (almost
accurate account of Sind history) 6) The Gauda-Vaho 7) Nepala Raja Vamsavali 8) Jain
Patvalis 9) Silasanas 10) Tamra-saasanas (Stone and copper plate inscriptions 11)
Prasatis (eg.Samudhragupta's Iron Pillar) 12) Various Mutt records etc.
It is sacrilege to discard puranas. Besides there are histories like Harsha Charitha of Bana.
It is a pity that all old records of the world except that of India were given credence to in
computing our history by secular indologists.
Innumerable errors & deliberate distortion of facts are now passed as Indian history driven by the sheer
prejudices of alien historians.
All the vile historians didnt compile our history independently but have drawn evidence
only from Puranas while twisting 2 suit their view.
Sir William Jones who swallowed the 1200 years of history between Chandragupta
Maurya and Gupta Chadragupta acknowedges Puranas!
It is clear that without Puranas that even the secular distortions could not have a basis.
Vie on those who poo-poo our Puranas!
U have to question why the indologists try to distance themselves from Puranas. The
answer is to conform to the biblical idea!
U have to know the root of this putrid secularism which swears against religion but
cannot stand without its bible!
The European historians who were accustomed to the idea of Greek & Roman histories of
less than 3000 years were stunned at our antiquity!
Our Puranic history to the amazement of these miopic historians dealt with lakhs and
crores of years history!
These Puranas of such ancience were therefore considered a astronomical fiction than
actual history by the biblical idiots of sec history.
Crores of yrs of history were sudddenly compacted into mere 1000s or even 100s of years
of history.All becas we've become a subject nation:(
A superiority complex in this still subject nation wud lead to a rebellion against these vile
masters and lead us to regain our glory!
Sri Kota Venkatachalam has proved the genuineness of the 3 post-Mahabharata eras and
his logic is irrefutable.
Yudhishtira era, Kali era and Saptharishi era have been continuously and consistently
followed in our country.
What prevents historians from pursuing in the lines of the eras we consistently follow? Of course, it is the
secularist fear of our Dharma.
It was only by repudiating these real eras that they were able to swallow the 1200 years
of our missing history.
Sri Kota Venkatachalam had exposed the hollowness of these secularist distortions & by
sheer logic reinstated our proud history.
Admirably Sri Kota Venkatachalam attacked the false history of Buddha and Adi Sankara.
Damage done 2 our history by false historians are really temporary. We will consign these false prophets in2
dubstins where they belong.
For every country of the modern world, except Bharat, the recorded history of the people
goes back to 5 r 6 centuries before Christ.
The history of these non-Bharatiyas before 600 BC is not available and they are
absolutely in dark of their original home.
Only Bharat provides such ancient history of its people to a hoary past of 195 crores of
years & to the beginning of creation.
This history has been recorded & preserved safe and pure in the ithihaasas and puraanas,
our historical ancient treatises. This great stretch of historical life has been divided into
the different Manvantharas. In the current Brahma kalpa we are now in the time of the
7th Manu 195,58,85,113 years after the beginning of creation. The period of six Manus,
each 30,67,24,000 years long have been left behind, and in the period of the 7th Manu
Vaivasvat, 27 Mahayugas have passed away, each of 43,20,000 years duration. In the
28th Mahayuga of Vaivasvatha Manu, the Krita, Treta, Dwapara yugas together account
for 38,88,000 years and towards the end of Dwapara, 36 years before the commencement
of the current Kali yuga there took place the Great Mahabharata War.
We may designate as the ancient period of our history, the period from the
commencement of the Vaivasvata manvanthara to the beginning of its 28th Mahayuga to
the end of the Dwapara yuga and the Mahabharata War which occured thereabouts, as the
medieval period of our country's history. The period from Mahabharata War, up to date,
will then constitute the modern age in our history.
The 'very ancient period' would cover from the time of creation to the 7th Manu.
"Ancient Period" would cover from the beginning of the 7th Manvanthara to the end of
27th Mahayuga therein.
"Medieval Period" would be the beginning of the 28th Mahayuga to the end of
Mahabharata War ie. 36 years before Kali.
"Modern Period" would be from Mahabharata War to the present day.
With regard to the modern period of our history from the time of Mahabharata war ie. 36
years before Kali started - 3138 BC - we find mentioned in our Puranas, not only the
prominent royal dynasties which gained ascendancy and the total duration of their reigns,
but also the names of the several kings of each dynasty in order and the duration of the
reign of each king. We are used to take the history of Imperial Magadha for the history
of Bharat. King Jarasandha of Magadha was killed by Bhima the Pandava hero before
Mahabharata war. His son Sahadeva was killed during the war. After the war while
Yudhishtira was crowned emperor of Bharat, Sahadeva's son Marjari alias Somadhi was
crowned King of Maghadha and he was the first of Barhadradha dynasty of Magadha. All
puranas unanimously declare that 22 kings of this dynasty ruled over Magadha for a
period of 1006 years. Thereafter 5 kings of Pradyota dynasty reigned for 138 years. Then
10 kings of Sisunaga dynasty reigned for 360 years. After that 9 kings of Nanda dynasty
reigned for 100 years. In all (1006+138+360+100) = 1604 years passed since the end of
Mahabharata war. The end of Nanda dynasty and the coronation of Chandragupta of
Maurya dynasty took place in the year 1534 BC (3138-1604=1534).
The secularists, colonial and neo-colonial fraudster historians gloss over this fact and
assert that this Chandragupta Maurya was the contemporary of Alexander 1200 years
later.
The four dynasties lasting 1604 years of Magadha emperors and their reigns specified in the
PuranNas viz. Barhadradha dynasty of 22 kings lasting 1006 years, Pradyota dynasty of 5
kings for 138 years, sisunga dynasty of 10 kings for a period of 360 years and Nanda
dynasty of 9 kings lasting 100 years are all accepted even by the European historians of our
country. But they ignore the basic date of Mahabharata war and identifying Maurya Chandra
Gupta of 1534 BC as the Chandra Gupta mentioned by the Greek historians who
accompanied Aleander the Great when he invaded India in 326 BC pretending to be
unaware of the later Chandra Gupta of the Gupta dynasty who was in fact the contemporary
of Alexander and assume the coronation of Maurya Chandragupta to be 322 BC and
proceeding on the basis of this fictitious and false starting poiint to determine the date of the
various dynasties and kings of Magadha before and after it with reference to it. Thus arises
the discrepancy of 1212 years (1534-322).
Sir William Jones was the first European Orientalist to attempt in 1774 a reconstruction
of ancient Indian history and prof. Max-Muller, the great scholar who lent his authority to
the current accepted history of ancient India in 1859 AD, declared that they had no
alternative to the course adopted by them, of identifying Maurya Chandragupta as the
contemporary of Alexander and baing the chronology of ancient Indian history on this
assumption.
When Mahabharata war ended and Yudhishtira was coronated in 3138 BC Yudhishtira
Era began. 36 years later in 3102 BC Kaliyuga commenced and Kali Era started. 26 years
later in 3076 BC a new era called Saptarshi Era or Loukikabda Era was inaugurated and
has been popular and still current in Kashmir. These are well known to Hindus. If the
history of our country had been constructed on the basis of these eras a true history would
have resulted. But the European Orientalists discarded the three well-known indigenous
eras and relied on assumed contemporaneity of Alexander the Great and Maurya
Chandragupta of Maghadha as the basis for chronological determination and thus arrived
at a false history.
The inscriptions of Ashoka and the Yona kings mentioned therein has been conclusively
proved to be the Yavana Kings of Bharathiya origin on the frontiers of Bharat in the west
in the 15th century BC and not the Greek Princes of Western Asia of the 3rd century BC as
alleged by the European orientalists. Incidentally it has been established that the Yonas or
Yavanas on the one hand and the Greeks on the other were two distinct races and they
had migrated to Greece called Ionia earlier at different times (first the Ionians and then
the Greeks in 800 BC), settled down there and the modern Greeks are the descendents of
the mixed origin of the two races.