E-Mails S-050 through S-099
S-050. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL / forwarded an email he sent to scientist Yoshinari Minami
S-051. from Bob King regarding additional testimony as to the teleportation aspect of the P-X
S-052. Bob King (follow-up to email #51)
S-053. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding an experiment to create mini-black holes
S-054. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an e-mail regarding help in a new Bose-Einstein
condensate
S-055. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding background courses in Riemannian geometry
S-056. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an e-mail to NASA about UNITEL's projects
S-057. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Spaceship Fiber Bundle Connection
S-058. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding bewilderment over lack of government funding
S-059. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Jack Sarfatti's skepticism
S-060. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding viewing engineering CAD drawing of the UNITEL
lens
S-061. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding contract award to a competitor
S-062. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding disclosing all projects to potential investors
S-063. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Sarfatti takes on Witten & Hawking
S-064. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL referencing a formal application by UNITEL
S-065. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a potential new investor company
S-066. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a debate challenge to Jack Sarfatti
S-067. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding the chances of Sarfatti accepting the debate
S-068. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding how science doesn't always understand why
something works
S-069. from Alexander Beletsky regarding a Soviet UFO Research Institute
S-070. from Tom Mahood regarding UNITEL
S-071. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding other people who want to debate Jack Sarfatti
S-072. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding writing a book about the UNITEL experience
S-073. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding obtaining a National Institute of Health grant
S-074. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding setting UNITEL's stock prices
S-075. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding the UNITEL newsletter
S-076. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding P-R & promotional materials
S-077. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a Spain-based business potential partner
S-078. from Jack Sarfatti regarding Zero-Point Energy technology
S-079. from Jack Sarfatti forwarding a response to Stan Tenen to members on his e-lists
S-080. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Zero-Point Energy
S-081. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding making slow progress to success
S-082. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a recent UFO case at Malstrom AFB
S-083. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Stephen Greer and "Out of Body Experiences"
S-084. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding others "copying" macroscopic quantum tunneling
S-085. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding another configuration for the UNITEL craft
S-086. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL correcting my "mis-conclusions" about e-mail S-085
S-087. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding why electrical charges collect on an aircraft's wing
S-088. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding UNITEL's "capped-cone" hull design
S-089. from Jack Sarfatti (apparently regarding my support for UNITEL)
S-090. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL rebuking Jack Sarfatti
S-091. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an e-mail from UNITEL's research director Mike
Miller re. "Solid Light"
S-092. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding "FiberBundles"
82
S-093. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding partnership with companies intending to mine the
Moon
S-094. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Scientific American article on "fiberbundles"
S-095. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a post at a Yahoo! Quantum Time Travel club
S-096. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding UNITEL's newsletter
S-097. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding my message posted at a Yahoo! "Quantum Time
Travel" club
S-098. from "Nanna Visitor" regarding an invitation to join a "Theoretical Sciences" on-line club
S-099. from Bob King regarding a correction to the Pine Gap, Australia mystery
83
S-050. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL / forwarded an email he sent to UNITEL consultant
Yoshinari Minami
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: Transmission of bundle of papers in zip file
Date : Thu, 8 Nov 2001 12:54:56 -0800
> Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 12:57:43
> To: y-minami@nepas.nec.co.jp
> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
> Subject: Re: Transmission of bundle of papers in zip file
>
> Dear Yoshinari:
>
> How are things going for you? Good I hope. Someone sent me the following information that
seems very similar to your aerospace propulsion design. The following excerpts concerning
"divided space" from Bob Beckwith's book "Hypotheses" reminds me much of your "fine structure"
of space that you refer to in your IAF-IAA papers. Is "divided space" the same as your fine structure
(or what we refer to in our design as hyperspace or 5 thru 11 dimensions of space-time)?
>
>> "Beckwith conjectures that the premise of Teller's IX-97 test was to teleport the minesweeper
to a previous point in its space-time trajectory by encapsulating the boat in a highly specialized
three-phase "electromagnetic bottle". As incredible as it sounds, this would allow a ship to
"blip" out of the way of a mine to safety. He proposes that the experiment's intent was to give a
U.S. vessel, at the flip of a switch, the instantaneous ability to be physically removed from the
universal space-time coordinate in which it detected the presence of an enemy mine. Beckwith
suggests that the creation of such a separated space-time field can be done by engaging the
principles of what he calls 'divided space'."
>>
>> "In his book Hypotheses, Beckwith develops a series of fascinating postulates based on some
premises which I will grossly oversimplify here. [the strong nuclear force which holds an atomic
nucleus together] can be broken with the application of what is called "a three-phase neutrino
field" which, in turn, creates a bubble of "divided space". Beckwith explains that a related
phenomenon, which occurs haphazardly in nature, is "ball lightning". Interestingly enough, such
ball lightning or "Tesla balls" have figured repeatedly in UFO eyewitness accounts."
>>
>>"… he explains: "A space divided from universal space can be created by causing a small
percentage of neutrinos [that permeate all matter in our universe] passing through the space to
travel in a vortex rotating at a frequency in the order of 7.5 Hertz. Strong force lines at the
boundaries of the space are interrupted so long as the vortex exists. This twisting field is
necessary to break the field of strong force lines between all matter in universal space and to
create an inner space separated from universal space."
>>
>>"If a rotating magnetic field is operated in synchronism with the Earth's 7.32 Hz fundamental
resonance, objects within one such space can be moved with respect to our 'universal space'
when power is applied. The divided space is then free of forces of inertia or gravity. Once the
space is divided, objects within the space may levitate, teleport, or move in time. Divided inner
space can pass through universal space but is dependent on the drag and surface sharpness
between spaces being low enough to prevent piercing the shell of the missing strong force lines.
84
Electromagnetic waves, including visible light and infrared heat, can pass through the boundaries
of the divided spaces."
>
> I am just curious to hear your opinion on this divided space idea. I hope to hear from you soon.
>
> best wishes,
> Larry Maurer
S-051. from Bob King regarding additional testimony as to the teleportation aspect of the P-X
From : bob king <bobking@xtra.co.nz>
To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com>
Subject : Re: possible corroboration to P-X "teleportation" goal
Date : Fri, 9 Nov 2001 11:27:30 +1300
Hello Mark,
Friday, November 09, 2001, 3:49:22 AM, you wrote:
> It's been awhile since we last "talked". A lot of web hosting companies have shut down the
message boards on popular P-X and Montauk sites.
The Govt. shut them down.
> I found this in Chica Bruce's book. It verifies what you contended was the main goal of the PX -- teleportation as opposed to 'radar invisibility' -- but perhaps with a different twist. I
prepared it as a MS-Word document (attached), but I'm including the simple text versions below
(I recall you had some trouble opening attached documents).
Thanks for you info. I hope you don't mind but I will make a few comments …
> Peter Moon helped Preston Nichols …
Both these men have been discredited now and are only out to make money.
> A fourth guy -- Duncan Cameron -He has also been discredited.
> A new writer/investigator -- Alexandra "Chica" Bruce -I am not familiar with her name.
> Although I was very enthusiastic when I read my first Montauk book, I became more doubtful
with each succeeding one I purchased.
Perhaps you could find an explanation then for the area being a national park with notices saying
trespassers will be shot on sight!
85
> One investigator --Dr. Richard Boylan -- …
I am in contact with him by email and he cannot produce any supporting evidence, photos etc. to
confirm anything he says.
> … did tell me "there is so much disinformation and lies about Montauk that the real truths (if
any) will probably be never be known".
Agreed.
> Late in 1942 while still in his early twenties, Beckwith invented Frequency Shift Keyed
transfer trip equipment which facilitated the sending of electrical power over long distances.
Tesla patented that system.
> Between WW I and WW II, the Germans had developed underwater mines that were set off by
the magnetism of passing ships' hulls requiring no direct contact with the targets.
Which would still go off even if the ship was invisible!!
> Dr. Edward Teller. Teller described to him a small-scale teleportation demonstration by
Nikola Tesla which he intended to duplicate using a full-scale minesweeper.
I think I told you about that experiment.
> Beckwith's testimony is a very interesting and exciting development in the unraveling of this
WW II secret. Conspicuously absent from this version of the Philadelphia Experiment are the
figures of John von Neumann, "Dr. Rinehart" and the USS Eldridge which are all normally
associated with the legend. Beckwith is convinced that these details are part of the
disinformational campaign set up by the Navy to confuse the issue and discredit accounts of
what actually took place.
Who is he? And what qualifications does he claim to have?
> … had nothing whatsoever to do with radar invisibility. It was actually an elaboration of
Nikola Tesla's earlier work in teleportation.
As I said!
I don't bother with reading much about this subject now as most of it is pure conjecture and -- after
all this time -- the truth will probably never be able to be confirmed. Which makes the issue a pointless
one to follow. I gave you the facts. Whether-or-not you believe them is your choice.
Regards,
bob
mailto:bobking@xtra.co.nz
86
S-052. from Bob King (follow-up to email #51)
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof
Date : Sat, 10 Nov 2001 08:26:08 +1300
Hello Mark,
Saturday, November 10, 2001, 1:19:37 AM, you wrote:
> I had finally gotten around to finishing Chica's book. The part about the minesweeper and
"teleportation" (really not per se, mote along the lines of backward time-travel to a previous
point in history) agreed pretty much with what you said in your take on the P-X. I just thought
you'd be interested in the fact that someone else was coming forward with a similar story.
Yes. It's nice to know at least someone else has got onto the truth.
> Like you, I have email exchanges with Boylan, Beardon, Lazar, Cooper, etc.
Boylan cannot produce one shred of evidence on his monolith theory such as a single photo etc.
> If things could be proved so easily, we'd only have one religion ... and so on and so on.
Dream on! :-)
> I think a lot of what Lazar said was "true" whether he actually worked on it or not.
Possibly. I hold an open mind on all of this stuff. He has been discredited, though.
> He may have contrived his story from the Billy Meier "photographs", Betty and Barney Hill's
abduction by Zeti Reticuli aliens, and what he heard from friends who worked at Area 51. That
doesn't mean none of can't be true.
Agreed.
> Actually some sources have told me if anything, Montauk was a test site for mind control
experiments on human guinea pigs.
Correct.
> I posted your history of the P-X at my makeshift site which attempts to
What's the address of your site?
> I do value your input on these subjects.
I cannot give you anything more than I have done without making it up!!
Regards,
87
bob
mailto:bobking@xtra.co.nz
S-053. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding an experiment to create mini-black holes
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : a new experiment to confirm superstrings
Date : Sat, 10 Nov 2001 10:27:09 -0800
Dear Mark:
Thanks. I will look forward to getting the package. Concerning the mini-black hole in the
laboratory, we want to create one Gigantic "exciton" (or electron-hole pair) with our aerospace EM
propulsion system. We have tried to contact Dr. Andre Mysrywicsz (Univ. of Paris) to see if he would
be interested in following up on his proposal to create a Bose_Einstein condensate out of excitons. He
proposed this before the Ketterle group at Colorado created a BEC out of hydrogen.
The fact is that a BEC composed out of excitons will last for hours, months, etc. at room
temperature. The dielectric force would work in our favor in splitting up N-S, (+) and (-) particle
constituents. Anyway, this would be a mini-black hole only attached to our exciton BEC system.
Comments?
Regards,
Larry Maurer
UNITEL, Inc.
S-054. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an e-mail regarding help in a new BoseEinstein Condensate
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Fwd: Re: a new experiment to confirm superstrings
Date : Sat, 10 Nov 2001 20:19:31 -0800
> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 20:18:52 -0800
> To: mysy@enstay.ensta.fr
> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
> Subject: Fwd: Re: a new experiment to confirm superstrings
>
> Dear Prof. Mysyrowicz:
>
> We are attempting to set up a laboratory experiment to create a Bose-Einstein condensate of biexcitonic particles. We would be very happy to work with you and to invite you as a technical
consultant. If you are interested please reply and hopefully we can work out an agreeable contract.
We would like to get started immediately. I hope to hear from you soon. Thank you.
>
> Sincerely,
88
>
> Larry D. Maurer, Principal
> & Director, Engineering
> UNITEL, Inc.
> (503) 232-2740
> www.unitelnw.com
S-055. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding background courses in Riemannian geometry
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Fwd: Re: a new experiment to confirm superstrings
Date : Sat, 10 Nov 2001 20:32:49 -0800
Mark :
FYI: Very Important!!
Please review the following URL that is about why we have the "capped-cone" or tear-drop shape of
our exterior charged space vehicle:
http://www.math.washington.edu/Grads/Courses/2001-2002/547.html
Math 547 - Geometric Structures. Judith Arms, Autumn 2001, MWF 1:30-2:20
'Math 547' is an introduction to the primary concepts and techniques of Riemannian
geometry: Riemannian metrics and connections, geodesics, curvature, and Jacobi fields. We
will use these tools to prove the fundamental theorems relating curvature and topology: the
theorems of Gauss-Bonnet, Cartan-Hadamard, Bonnet, and Cartan-Ambrose-Hicks.
Text: Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature by John M. Lee.
Prerequisites: Math 544/5/6, Topology and Geometry of Manifolds.
I have been asked about background reading and preparation for the course. None is
needed beyond knowing the material from 544/5/6. (The second chapter of Riemannian
Manifolds contains a quick review of this prerequisite material if you would like a reminder.)
However, if you are interested there are a couple of undergraduate texts you could read
recreationally as an introduction to some ideas and examples: Riemannian Geometry by
Frank Morgan (both the 1993 and 1998 editions) and chapter 12 in "The Shape of Space":
How to Visualize Surfaces and 3-Dimensional Manifolds by Jeffrey R. Weeks. (The 1998
edition of Morgan's book will be on reserve.) There's also a Scientific American article
"Fiber Bundles and Quantum Theory"' by Bernstein and Phillips, Sci. Am. 245 (July 1981),
pp. 122-127 which introduces the reader to Riemannian geometry on surfaces and then
applies the ideas to Physics. {Scientific American is available in the Natural Sciences
Library.)
The rest of the sequence: We probably will spend the first few weeks of 548 finishing
Riemannian Manifolds. The syllabus for the rest of 548 and 549 is yet to be determined but
will include introductions to most or all of the following: complex and almost complex
89
structures on manifolds; principal and associated bundles and connections; characteristic
classes; symplectic and contact geometry.
S-056. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an e-mail to NASA about UNITEL's projects
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Fwd: A new experiment to confirm superstrings
Date : Sat, 10 Nov 2001 21:15:28 -0800
> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 21:12:59 -0800
> To: Jean.Schuerger@grc.nasa.gov
> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
> Subject: Fwd: A new experiment to confirm superstrings
>
> Dear Jean:
>
> FYI: We hope that NASA and USAF would be interested in our forthcoming projects that are
discussed in the e-mails below. We are hoping that we can acquire further professional assistance to
describe our proposed aerospace propulsion system. It is important for any reviewing entity to
understand the fiber bundle topology connected with our proposed system.
>
> One main specific area is the connection of the forward projected laser beam and the
paraboloidically-curved laser emitting lens that provides the parallel transport mechanism that
creates a string-like state. Judith Arms is definitely one individual that can explain mathematically
what our design will do. Please advise us as what we should do for applying for grants, etc. if there
is any interest in our proposed projects. Thank you,
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Larry D. Maurer, Principal
> & Director, Engineering
> UNITEL, Inc.
> (503) 232-2740
> www.unitelnw.com
>
>> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 20:51:59 -0800
>> To: arms@math.washington.edu
>> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
>> Subject: A new experiment to confirm superstrings
>>
>> Dear Dr. Arms:
>>
>> We would like to discuss our forthcoming projects that entail construction and testing of
prototypes with our subcontractors; Applied Sciences, Inc., UIC Microphysics Labs, Rolls
Royce Deutschland and Flight Unlimited.
We need technical support to explore
geometrodynamics and fiber bundle connection and related effects concerned with our
proposed project. I think you will be interested in what we are attempting to accomplish with
our patented invention that was strongly based on Bernstein&Phillips 1981 Scientific
90
American article. We would love to hear from you Judith in regards to your valued opinion to
what we are trying to accomplish. Thank you,
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Larry D. Maurer, Principal
>> & Director, Engineering
>> UNITEL, Inc.
>> (503) 232-2740
>> www.unitelnw.com
S-057. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Spaceship Fiber Bundle Connection
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : UNITEL Spaceship: Fiber Bundle Connection
Date : Sat, 10 Nov 2001 21:23:55 -0800
Attachment : paratrans.jpg (557k), partrans.gif (33k)
Mark:
Here are some illustrations from Bernstein&Phillips article. You can see the parallel transport and
capped-cone shape. This is the scientific jist of what we are advancing.
Larry Maurer
UNITEL, Inc.
91
92
S-058. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding bewilderment over lack of government funding
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Nobody Gets Out Alive!!
Date : Sun, 11 Nov 2001 10:30:56 -0800
At 10:53 AM 11/11/01 -0500, you wrote:
> Mr. Maurer ->
> Your series of e-mails this weekend has both greatly impressed me with your serious intentions
and overwhelmed me in the cutting-edge physics & technology. They left me dumbfounded.
>
> Did you ever watch any of those old B&W Sherlock Holmes movies with Basil Rathbone and
Nigel Bruce? Holmes examines a walking cane and says, "Watson, the man who used this cane
was short & stock and was accompanied by an attractive blond-haired woman." To which
Watson snorts "Oh rubbish, Holmes! How do you know that?" [the Americanize-translation
would be "Oh bull-shit, Holmes! How did you pull that out of your ass?!"]
>
> That's who I think is needed to answer the question why-oh-why is government (and in
particular NASA) not taking a more active role in UNITEL's cause? I've seen 2 Navy contract
proposals for interstellar travel via manipulation of space-time geometry. There must be 2,000+
more I haven't seen. Playing "Devil's Advocate" for a moment, the only thing I can think of is
they are pursuing their own methods of how to MQT and found that it's a lot harder than they
first realized (either to do it, or to navigate and return, or perhaps it has disastrous effects on
health). Maybe that's why they are waiting to see if your ideas can solve the problem, and then
funding will quickly follow. Is there a way they can lawfully "grab" your company under
national security concerns?
93
>
> You remember the story of Canadian engineer Gerald Bull who was having trouble getting
funding for his "Super Gun". He finally got it from the Iraquis. Israel perceived a threat as he
was making progress, and it is rumored that Israeli agents assassinated him in his Beirut
apartment. Keep that in mind when considering funding from sources that may be unfriendly to
people that can do you harm.
>
> -- Mark
Dear Mark:
Sometimes I wish they would come and get me like Dr, Royal Rife or whatever. I get so tired of not
getting anywhere. But oh well, I will never quit! :-) I know Sarfatti is part of their game. But I am not
going to get caught up in that paranoia that I have heard from day one.
I went to bed last night dreaming of the capped cone fiber bundle mechanism combined with our
charged Niobium-Titanium hull. Talk about POWER! How could anybody ignore this? All anyone
seems to be concerned with is our MQT potential.
Knowing that the thing works is something else I tell you. Looking down the barrel of the [UFO]
craft 10 feet away while my heart nearly jumped out of my throat, I will never forget! The response and
maneuverability was like a helicopter in ultra-high-speed.
Aside all this, concerning the all important lens I am going to start a 3-D exploded view of the 4 ft.
diameter, RF-activated RGB, glass crystallite lens in my AutoCad 2000. I am not familiar with 3-D
ACAD yet but I shall have fun learning. I also have a $3K 3D Studio Max program.
The lens is the all-important key to making our system work. I think Applied Sciences could
create the lens if they had the drawings and specs.
Regards,
Larry Maurer
UNITEL, Inc.
S-059. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Jack Sarfatti's skepticism
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: Dr. Jack seems to have EVERYONE in his sights !
Date : Sun, 11 Nov 2001 16:56:59 -0800
Attachment : 1759a5d.jpg (1k)
At 05:55 PM 11/11/01 -0500, you wrote:
> As I said, somehow I landed on his mailing list. If anything, it has proved useful in that a lot
of people seemed to have incurred his "wrath". So you're not the only one. He even picked on
his "well-meaning friend Joe Firmage" . I received these 5 "gems" in 2 hours. I can't remember
any of my college professors having such ill-tempered bedside manners : … … … …
>
94
> -- Mark
Dear Mark;
I just can't get over this guy! For the life of me, I can't figure why he singled us out to attack when
we should be getting his interest and support. The only thing I can see why he is using us for a reason is
pure unadulterated jealousy.
I mean that is sick, knowing full well that our invention is American and it would be devastating to
all of us if it were to be used by enemies against us as a weapon. We should be pulling together on this.
Especially in times like this to bring in this new quantum technology to Society.
Why don't you request to be dropped from his mailing list? (On the other hand, it would be good to
see what the rat is up to concerning his libelous writings.)
Mark, I have a "D" sized ACAD 2000 drawing of our 2 ft.-diameter lens. Would you like a copy for
your own information? I trust you with the design as it is covered by our patent. But I would like you to
see that we have a concrete design that we intend to build and test very soon. Let me know.
Best,
Larry
S-060. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding viewing engineering CAD drawing of the
UNITEL lens
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: History in-the-making !
Date : Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:42:52 -0800
At 08:15 PM 11/11/01 -0500, you wrote:
>> … technology to society. Why don't you request to be dropped from his mailing list?
>
> At first I was going to do that. But I think I'm going to stay on it awhile just to see what he
is up to. If nothing else I did get some email addresses of other notables in this area.
>
>> Mark, I have a "D" sized ACAD 2000 drawing of our 2 ft. diameter lens. Would you
like a copy for your own information? I trust you with the design as it is covered by our
patent but I would like you to see that we have a concrete design that we intend to build
and test very soon. Let me know.
>
>One -- it's not necessary because I believe you. I really do. Two -- I wouldn't know what to
do with it. For example, the terms "D-sized" and "ACAD 2000" don't mean a thing to me. I
honestly feel that I'm witnessing history in-the-making on something that has fascinated me
my entire life. (As I kid I put together every rocket kit the Testors model company came out
with.)
>
95
> From what little of it I can understand, I think the engineering design is well-conceived.
Now there may be some missing parts in physics that have yet to be ironed-out to back-up the
design. Maybe that's why Sarfatti & company are complaining so much. I think a better
approach would be to give the guy (you) the benefit-of-the-doubt and for humanity's sake -an epoch-making event -- try to wrestle with theory and see if some new insights couldn't
provide any missing links. From what other researchers have said in their UFO tales, these
discs seemed to have brought with them a "new" physics that some have thought to be
hundreds of years ahead of us. For whatever reason, Mr. Maurer, you seemed to have been
uniquely chosen and given a "shortcut".
>
> -- Mark
Mark:
A S-sized drawing is a large shop drawing. I thought you would enjoy having a copy just to see the
simplicity of the design. Albeit, it isn't really THAT simple. But it appears that way.
Remember when I told you that at the culmination of our first sighting when the UFO craft landed
10 ft. in front of us? The main purpose of that little maneuver was to show us the lens (note: this is only
my opinion) as it turned off its main light and then turned on an interior light. The four of us could see
through the lens into the vehicle.
To my knowledge, at that time there were no lasers that you could see through. This became a
guideline for us to get our patent and develop our designs. What you see is the culmination of years of
work and study in optics, superlattices, and physics. Funny how it just doesn't appear as powerful or as
formidable as a rocket or whatever. But it is!
Sincerely,
Larry Maurer
S-061. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding contract award to a competitor
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com>
Subject : Re: Afghan "splash art"
Date : Mon, 12 Nov 2001 14:11:59 -0800
I just sent off an email contact to BMDO (see http://www.bmdotechnology.net/contactinfo.asp )
notice their recent grant to Smartskin, Inc. Talk about ripoff! Hey! WE are the pioneers (almost
anyway; the now defunct AVCO of Everette, NJ really was) in smartskin apps! I shall keep you
informed.
Best,
Larry Maurer
UNITEL, Inc.
S-062. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding disclosing all projects to potential investors
96
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: keep "it" to yourself
Date : Mon, 12 Nov 2001 15:36:58 -0800
at 05:24 PM 11/12/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Mr. Maurer ->
>The materials I'm sending you (last week and this week) will acquaint you with the most
"popular" stories regarding UFOs, the Philadelphia Experiment, and the Montauk Project. I'm
convinced that a fair percentage of these incidents are true but may have happened at places
different than what appears in the accounts. Then too a fair amount of disinformation (both
accidental/well-meaning & deliberate/intentional) has been added to confuse/protect the
technologies being investigated. The point being that while it is beneficial to commit to
memory these as reference material (as I lean toward believing all of them share some
common "new" physics), do NOT go around quoting them to potential investors as the
"gospel truth" because most mainstream people regard them as quackery. I certainly don't
want to see you shoot yourself "in-the-foot" after coming this far ... I would blame myself for
that.
>
>That other company I alerted you to -- "Tdimension" -- already seems to have some
contracts & products with military use in addition to this anti-grav prototype they are trying to
build. Even though your superlattice lens is more advanced than their dye laser, you might
want to consider using them as an example in your written petitions for funding. The logic
would be something like they are a new technology company that has produced products and
is researching the same area as UNITEL has been doing (although more primitively). If other
people are giving them the benefit-of-the-doubt, why don't they do the same for UNITEL
whose designs offer quantum leaps in so many other areas!
>
>Well I'm back to work on this next package of stuff …
>
> -- Mark
Mark:
Thank you for the info. Don't worry, we are extremely careful of who we negotiate with concerning
our investment groups. Believe me, we can't even whisper the 'UFO' word! We are a legal engineeringelectronics firm with investors that we have to be responsible to and we are very conservative in our
demeanor.
Regards,
Larry Maurer
S-063. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Sarfatti takes on Witten & Hawking
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
97
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: Sarfatti takes on Ed Witten & Stephen Hawing
Date : Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:57:07 -0800
At 07:06 AM 11/13/01 -0500, you wrote:
> From what I can tell, Ed Witten is generally regarded as the closest thing to Einstein today.
He searched for the origin of superstrings in hopes of finding something that would solve the
riddle of why so many superstring variants. He succeeded with M-brane theory (he did have
help from Petr Horava) and showed that under curtain conditions, an additional dimension
could open up and give the superstrings another surface to "attach on to". This was
instrumental in the new Ekprytoic alternative to the Inflationary part of the Big Bang,
suggesting that instead of originating from an infinitely-small point of infinite density, our
universe evolved from the shearing together of parallel 5-dimensional membranes in
something called the 'multiverse'. This new model -- proposed by one of the original
formulators of the Inflationary model -- is exciting because (1) it predicts the SAME results
using an entirely different physics and (2) it doesn't require gravitational waves or magnetic
monopoles (which have never been detected) as does the Inflationary model. But Sarfatti
refers to this as "Witten's guess at the Theory of Everything". Did Sarfatti ever win the
MacArthur Fellowship ("genius award") or a Fields medal like Dr. Witten did?
>
>Then apparently he takes on Dr. Hawking too. I only read 10% of it before I got too
disgusted to go any further. I try to give Sarfatti the benefit-of-the-doubt and assume he's
trying to weed out unsubstantiated concepts and just gets over-zealous in his efforts.
Sometimes, though, I think he is as "militant" as the terrorists are in what they do.
>
> -- Mark
Mark:
My esteemed physics expert Michael Miller has been hammering the quantum physics concerning
strings, monopoles, hadrons etc. since day one. When we first met with Dr. Rudolph C. Hwa (Director,
Inst. of Science, University of Oregon) in March 1983, he took me aside and said that he was going to
prove that Mike didn't know anything about physics to be even able to talk to Dr. Hwa.
After we asked him to review our Type IV system design, he said that he wanted to "find out if Mike
was even knowledgeable enough of physics" (because Mike didn't even have a degree in Physics) before
he would review our design. Hwa had a very smug attitude towards this and was sort of winking at me
saying "Watch this and learn, Larry".
Well, the next day at 3:00 pm at Dr. Hwa's office Mike and I showed up at Hwa's office (the institute
is a grad school of physics at UO). I did not know for sure what caliber of physics Mike was at in his
knowledge. But I was about to find out. I sat there quiet for more than 3 hours while Hwa would ask
question-after-question about physics to Mike. And Mike would promptly and curtly reply the correct
answer.
Dr. Hwa was getting edgy. Finally, Michael dropped the big one when he asked Dr. Hwa "Why
don't we discuss QCD?" At that point, Dr. Hwa was profusely sweating (I am not exaggerating in the
slightest here) and set back in his chair announcing "My God! QCD was just invented 2 years ago!"
98
Then Hwa asked the final question concerning QCD and his -- again -- correct answer. At that point,
Hwa threw in the towel announcing that he "had never in all his career met anyone like Mike". He then
invited Mike to join his school to pursue a career in physics when Mike replied "my career is UNITEL".
This happened again at an official meeting between UNITEL and Boeing Aerospace & Electronics
in December 1989 with Dr. Terence W. Barrett (Manager of Advanced Concepts) reviewing our project
which he gave an "A+". Boeing changed its name to Boeing Aerospace&Defense Products. Barrett left
Boeing (over a flap with the USAF which Barrett was head of the B-1 Bomber project). The President
of Boeing Aerospace Charlie Johnson (who initiated the meeting after careful scrutiny) was moved out
of his position to another in the company). This left us out in the cold.
And it happened again with a successful technical meeting with Honda R&D with our esteemed
associate Yoshinari Minami in 1997 when the Japanese economy literally fell out of the bottom
overnight.
And now Rolls Royce with the 9/11 economical flap. When, dear God, oh when are we ever going
to get a break!!!???
At any rate, Hwa met with us (as I mentioned before) and tore us a new one concerning the type IV
in his review.
Here is the kicker. The type V design is the exact transparent RF-activated RGB lens system that we
were shown. It wasn't until after we met with Hwa that we made changes in 1985 and then got our
patent in 1989. This is what my engineering is based on. Years of scrutiny of Physics!!! I think it's
high time ("High Noon") we had a shootout between Mike and Jack Sarfatti and/or Michio Kaku with a
debate about Physics concepts! I would bet the farm on my business partner Mike Miller!
Concerning DoD rip-offs, have you seen the smartskin project funding announcement I sent you to
Smartskin, Inc. in Chaska, MN? I am starting to suspect. We need to get our book out to John Q. Public
ASAP!!
Sincerely,
Larry Maurer
S-064. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding UNITEL's formal application
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Fwd: UNITEL, Inc.
Date : Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:58:17 -0800
Mark:
FYI- Our formal app!
>Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 14:02:48 -0800
>To: techapps@nttc.edu
>From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
99
>Subject: UNITEL, Inc.
>Dear Sirs;
>We have both patented smartskin and charged particle EM laser beam device designs available
for potential grant funding. We have as one subcontractor, Applied Sciences, Inc., Cedarville,
OH that was suggested as a viable contractor from the old BMDO "Diamond Initiative" whereby
Applied Sciences went successfully through Phases I thru III. We also have a patented design
for a quantum optical computer design available as well. We have recently updated our DUNNS
and CAGE codes and are ready to apply.
>We are prepared to send design drawings for your scrutiny if you like. Please advise how we
should go about contacting the proper investigatory dept's. I hope to hear from you soon. Thank
you,
>Sincerely,
>Larry D. Maurer, Principal
>& Director, Engineering
>(503) 232-2740
>www.unitelnw.com
S-065. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a potential new investor company
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: I want to attend the shootout !
Date : Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:31:04 -0800
At 02:50 PM 11/13/01 -0500, you wrote:
> Did you ever think (from a conspiracy point-of-view) that the Air Force etc. doesn't really
want UNITEL to develop their prototypes? They feign interest only to make sure you're not
making progress. I just read one of the late Bill Cooper's essays. Clinton once called him the
'most dangerous man' on talk radio today. Cooper took that as a compliment that he was onto
something major. I'll send you his essay on the alleged government-alien conspiracy in which
among other he names Maccabee and Stevens (the guy I just recommended to you) as new
converts into the Aviary. As Boylan says, there's probably some truths in Cooper's
testimonies and the P-X and Montauk ... but how would you ever extract them from all the
disinformation?
>
> Let me know the time & place of the "shootout". Below is another Sarfatti "cutey" ... I
never in my life have come across someone supposedly so "brilliant" (his words) and yet so
caustic of others who don't agree with him 100%? His demeanor & attitude are almost mindboggling. I would have dropped out-of-school had I been verbally chastised so vehemently
for every wrong idea or answer I gave ...
>
> -- Mark
100
Mark:
I received your package today. A-OK! God must have been monitoring our last correspondence!
We are cutting a deal with Pacific Group Co., Long Beach, CA and our associate Bryan Willoughby for
$30 million for 45% of UNITEL with a 37% by-back clause after one year. We give up $2 million for
finder's fee with 2 board positions. Sound like a good deal? It's happening today, brother!! Wish us
luck!!
Should we even waste our time with Safarti now or just go for the hardware-software construction?
Hey, I am willing to gamble! Let's rock!!
Larry
S-066. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a debate challenge to Jack Sarfatti
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: I want to attend the shootout !
Date : Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:54:17 -0800
Mark:
Now that I got a breather (I haven't even had a second's rest to read any of the valued material you
sent), I checked out what you are talking about below. It's kind of funny as the Three Stooges are on the
TV right now and boy does Sarfatti fit right in on that mentality! I wonder if Mo was his original
mentor?! I mean his very words mimic Mo with "Moron", etc.
I think it would be a great duty to society that we would perform if we could just get Jackass Sarfatti
and Michael Miller to debate physics and UNITEL's design on public TV!! It would have to be on the
level of a pro TV wrestling contest as you know that Jackass will undoubtedly get surreal on us!
What a capper it would be for us to have a nice, professional description of our spaceship system
with Mike and Jackass at the end in clown suits with a 3-D redone Grouco Marx as narrator!! What an
idea for a show!!
We could accomplish 2 things at once! Mike could put Sarfatti away once and for all and the World
will absolutely laugh themselves sick at the humorous innuendos that Jackass will inevitably throw at
Mike! Do you want to ask Jackass if he will accept this challenge? Even if the whole thing was
choreographed to make Jack a hilarious comedian and inform the public as well to quantum physics. :-)
And we could all make a buck while we are getting public attention!
Best,
Larry
S-067. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding chances of Sarfatti accepting the challenge
101
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: I vote for "rocking"
Date : Tue, 13 Nov 2001 18:46:46 -0800
At 07:09 PM 11/13/01 -0500, you wrote:
> I was going to email you back but fell asleep when I got home from work. All that
debating Sarfatti & others will accomplish is soothe your vanity (assuming you win, which
you know he will never concede defeat). Better to constructively spend your time looking
for potential new partners. That's how I've always been personally. My feelings get hurt
just as easily as the next person's. But instead of trying to get "even" or seek revenge, I try
to find something that will get my mind off it; i.e., look for a better or more fun-filled
tomorrow than trying to clean up "spilled milk".
>
> I sent you another package today, including my poor attempt at creating a UNITEL ironon transfer you could put on t-shirts, jackets, and so on. Maybe give them to potential
investors or prominent stock holders. Lockheed did the same thing with their spy planes at
Skunk Works and Area-51. Government security was so tight that they weren't even
allowed to take the logo-ed coffee mugs out of their offices.
>
>
>>Should we even waste our time with Sarfatti now or just go for the hardwaresoftware construction? Hey, I am willing to gamble! Let's rock!!
>
>I know you're in the groove now because you're starting to sound like Al ("Let's Rock!")
Bundy !
>
> - Mark
Mark:
You're right, Mark. But you know, I am such a benevolent fool. I keep looking for that chunk of
good in people no matter how evil they seem.
I had a vision that I think was something that would be entertaining and enlightening as far as
instructing complicated and sometimes boring physics concepts. I got a positive response from our VP
Andy Moore when I described the scenario with "Carrot-Top" as a clown TV narrator-Host with Jackass
and Mike in clown suits and a bikini-clad babe with a cream pie to throw in the face of the loser to the
announced questions from Carrot-Top. This would be an excellent show to channel to education classes
in various colleges across the world.
You're right, though. Sarfatti's enormous ego would never allow it. Nice thought though, eh? Hey,
thanks for the material you sent too! Keep up the good faith!
Right now I am trying to get all pertinent business materials to Bryan Willoughby for the big
meeting tomorrow with the investor/backer people.
Best,
102
Larry
S-068. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding how science doesn't always understand why
something works
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: concerning the debate
Date : Tue, 13 Nov 2001 19:55:50 -0800
At 09:36 PM 11/13/01 -0500, you wrote:
> Mr. Maurer ->
> I know Sarfatti (as well as others) has put you through a lot of ridicule in the past. It's
only human nature to want to get even and have the last laugh. The timing may not be the
best right now, though. Bob Lazar (he's the first segment on that videotape I sent you) came
out with his story of working on a back-engineering project. Tom Mahood and others found
flaws in the Lazar story, mostly about his claimed educational background. They used this
to cast doubt on the whole Lazar account. There were some movie companies (New Line
Cinema, even Steven Seagul) who wanted to buy the rights to Lazar's story until these other
facts started coming out. I think they jumped to the wrong conclusions ... just because a few
things are incorrect doesn't mean the entire scenario is. That's what I suspect Sarfatti has
been doing to you. Pointing out how certain physics seem to invalidate your claims when I
suspect in your case engineering is leading-the-way (as opposed to vice versa) and new
scientific explanations for 'how' and 'why' it works will be developed later on to plug up all
the theoretical "holes".
>
> Glenn Campbell (not the singer) established a sprawling resource on the Internet as he sat
up headquarters next to Area-51. At first he came across as getting to the bottom of
government cover-ups and secrets. Then he seemed to switch sides and even "represented"
the government in a public television debate with Bob Lazar on his claims. Both sides lost
in that one. Kind of like a gunfight where both are mortally wounded.
>
> I don't know your whole story of course and how confident you are in such a debate's
outcome. My first reaction is "actions speak a lot louder than words"; and if you're a step
closer to building the HOLO-1 prototype, that would give you a lot more tangible
ammunition to counter Sarfatti's purely theoretical arguments. But I trust your decision on
whatever you want to do.
>
> The different video segments should reassure you that you are NOT crazy ... so many
unexplained encounters have happened (seemingly on purpose) to so many people in all
these countries. The P-X and Montauk books should make you aware of other experiments
that may have occurred (although not necessarily at Montauk) as well as the writing style
that has proved so popular. Peter Moon writes for an easy-listening audience. David
Darlington has a more intellectual witty writing style in his "Area 51 - the Dreamland
Chronicles". Martin Cannon has probably the most intellectual writing style of them all.
>
103
> The material you should receive Thursday or Friday is from Darlington's book as well as
Fawcett & Greenwood's "Clear Intent" -- that is the standard "bible" for serious UFO case
researchers. All of these should make you aware of the dominant stories/legends/folklore
that's out in these circles now. Perhaps something there will help fill in some "gaps" in your
endeavors or at least not make the same mistakes some of those guys made in relating their
stories. No data is entirely "bad" ... you can still learn from bad data.
>
> -- Mark
Mark:
I sure hope our $30 million investment deal goes thru tomorrow. You are right about the "holes" in
every theory. That is why I can't wait until we build and test our prototypes so we can get out of the
paper stage. Testing real hardware is where it's at. That's exactly what Dr. Terence Barrett said at
Boeing Aerospace after our successful meeting. He said that he didn't believe in computer simulation
and suggested building small prototypes to test.
As a matter of fact, Sarfatti contacted Barrett to bad mouth us. Barrett smugly told us he didn't care
about Sarfatti's insinuations and that he still planned on working with us when we got our funding. But
he didn't want the extra ridicule and didn't want to be directly associated with UNITEL.
Now that really pissed me off and that is when I threatened to take Sarfatti to court. That is when
Sarfatti decided it wasn't worth the strife and decided to cool his jets. I know deep down that Jackass
will slander or libel us as soon as someone asks him about UNITEL. If I really wanted to, I would lay a
trap that (you know he couldn't resist running his mouth against us) would make a solid case in court
against him. I just do not want to get into that energy. You never know though, he might piss me off
again with his damaging bad mouth attacks.
Staying positive and building earth-shaking devices is what we intend to do. We shall see. Possibly
you may pose the question to him when the day comes what Jackass says when we are successful with
our working prototypes. Especially if there is a Nobel Prize in the offing.
There are few "gaps" in our design and I am anxious to create a working prototype to blast our laser
beam at a nearby stump or old used car! What an industrial melt down that will be! Great tool for the
mining and/or tunneling industry.
Regards,
Larry Maurer
S-069. from Alexander Beletsky regarding a Soviet UFO Research Institute
From : Alexander Beletsky <riap777@yahoo.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Research Institute on Anomalous Phenomena, Kharkov, Ukraine
Date : Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:25:53 +0200
Dear Colleague,
104
My name is Alexander Beletsky. I am Vice-Director of Research Institute on Anomalous
Phenomena (RIAP) - an independent scientific-research body, established in Kharkov (Ukraine) ten
years ago. We aim at scientific studies in the fields of the UFO problem and the SETI (Search for
Extraterrestrial Intelligence) question. The Institute makes its investigations in close collaboration with
the CIS Academy of Cosmonautics and Russian Academy of Sciences. Please find here attached (as
Appendix I) a RIAP Information Leaflet describing the Institute's research programs in some detail.
To inform the international ufological community about the results of investigations that are
conducted by RIAP specialists and other scientists in the territory of the former Soviet Union, we
started, in 1994, a special periodical: newsletter RIAP Bulletin (RB). It is the ONLY serious
anomalistic periodical in the Commonwealth of Independent States published IN ENGLISH. There
appear in RB research articles, short communications, book reviews, letters to the Editor, etc.
RB Vol. 1, Nos. 1-4 - Vol. 7, Nos. 1-2 have been printed and sent to subscribers. They contain, in
particular, the papers "Post-Soviet Ufology: a View from Inside", by V.V.Rubtsov; "The 'Russian
Roswell": a Legend Under Examination", by 'Y.N.Morozov, "UFOs as Objects of Study by Terrestrial
Physics", by V.A.Buerakov; "Search for Alien Artifacts on the Moon: A Justification", by
A.V.Arkhipov; "History of State-Directed UFO Research in the USSR", by the Russian academic UFO
expert Y.V.Platov and Colonel B.A.Sokolov; "The Petrozavodsk Phenomenon", by L.M.Gindilis &
Y.K.Kolpakov; "The Black Ball: a Supposed Extraterrestrial Artifact", by V.N.Fomenko; "A Second
UFO Landing on the River Mzha", by a group of RIAP scientists, and others. We have also published
the first really comprehensive survey of anomalous features of the famous Tunguska explosion ("The
Tunguska Meteorite: A Dead-Lock or the Start of a New Stage of Inquiry?"), written by the leading
Russian specialist in this problem - Nikolay V. Vasilyev, Member of Academy.
RIAP Bulletin is published four times per year. Subscription rates: a life-long subscription - $100; 12
issues (three years) - $50; 8 issues (two years) - $35; 4 issues (one year) - $20. Airmail postage
included. Back issues are still available in limited quantities ($5 per copy, $75 a whole set - sixteen
issues).
RIAP Bulletin is also produced as a PDF file - that is immediately sent to subscribers via the
Internet. The "electronic RB" is an exact replica of its printed version. It can be easily read with the
help of a free browser - Adobe Acrobat Reader.
If you are interested in subscribing to RIAP Bulletin, please let me know. I and my colleagues
would be happy to inform you about advances and prospects of anomalistic studies in this part of the
world. There will appear in the next RB issues, in particular, the following papers: "Astroengineers over
Tunguska", by V.K.Zhuravlev; "UFOs: False and Genuine", by Y.V.Platov; "UFO Landings on the
Mzha River: the Investigations Continue", by V.P.Goloveshko et al., "Examining
Possible Paleovisit Traces", by Y.N.Morozov, and many others.
With all my best wishes and warmest regards, I remain
Sincerely yours, Alexander V. Beletsky, M.A., Vice-Director, RIAP
Appendix I
RESEARCH INSTITUTE ON ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA, Kharkov, Ukraine
105
The principal trends of researches of the institute in the UFO field are as follows: creation of an
efficient system of reconstruction of a real anomalous event on the basis of witnesses' testimonies;
formation of a unified CIS UFO data base (in collaboration with the Expert Group on Anomalous
Atmospheric Phenomena of the Russian Academy of Sciences) and a computer expert system to identify
genuine UFOs (GUFOs); development of physical models of GUFOs; monitoring of a place of recurrent
UFO landings on the river Mzha, near Kharkov; studies in the hidden history of Soviet ufology.
In the SETI field, there was realized, under the guidance of Alexey V. Arkhipov, phase I of the
program "Search for Alien Artifacts on the Moon" (SAAM) and its results have been presented on the
pages of RIAP Bulletin. Besides, we have been examining some enigmatic finds that can be considered
candidate extraterrestrial artifacts (ancient, or not so ancient). These are the so-called "Kassimov ball" a small (diameter some 4.5 cm) black ball of unknown origin, found in Central Russia in 1983 at a depth
of 7 meters, in a layer of pure red clay, - and the remains of a strange object that obviously originated
from space and fell down near Kharkov in 1994 (judging from its chemical composition, it is neither a
meteorite, nor terrestrial space junk).
The Institute pays considerable attention to the problem of the Tunguska explosion of 1908. We are
studying statistical parameters of the forest fall area, as well as the biogeochemical elemental and
isotopic anomalies and population-genetic effects, revealed in the area of the catastrophe. A state-ofthe-art collection of research papers on the Tunguska problem is now under preparation.
The Scientific Council and Advisory Board of the Institute include such Russian and Ukrainian
specialists in the UFO problem and SETI field as Dr. E.A.Ermilov (specialist in radio detection of aerial
anomalous phenomena), Dr. V.N.Fomenko (investigator of the famous Vashka find, as well as other
supposed ET artifacts), Y.A.Fomin (doyen of UFO studies in Russia), Dr. L.M.Gindilis (astronomer and
SETI expert), Dr. Y.V.Platov (Vice-Chairman of the Academic UFO Study Group), Dr. V.K.Zhuravlev
(investigator of the Tunguska explosion), and others. The Advisory Board comprehends also a group of
well-known Western scientists, scholars and engineers - V.-J.Ballester Olmos (Spain), Dr. T.E.Bullard
(USA), Dr. R.F.Haines (USA), Dr. A.Meessen (Belgium), et al. Dr. Vladimr V. Rubtsov, Full Member
of the CIS Academy of Cosmonautics and one of the pioneers of ufological studies in the former USSR,
is Director of RIAP.
Institute mailing address:
RIAP, P.O.Box 4684, 61022 Kharkov-22, Ukraine.
Internet e-mail addresses:
<riap777@yahoo.com>, <tolimak@nettaxi.com>
Website:
http://www.geocities.com/riap7
77/
S-070. from Tom Mahood regarding UNITEL
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 18:15:40 -0800
To: stealthskaters@yahoo.com
From: "Tom Mahood" <tlmahood@home.com>
Subject: Re: UNITEL obtaining foreign investment for MQT
106
At 07:30 AM 11/5/01 -0800, you wrote:
> Tom ->
> Don't know if you've heard of UNITEL before. Apparently they've made improvements
on a revolutionary crystalline laser lens after the old patent expired. I don't understand the
new physics except that its plasma effects are instrumental to achieving these macroscopic
quantum events. Sarfatti & "Ark" are among the detractors, but UNITEL apparently
convinced Rolls Royce enough that they were going to be the backers until 9-11 came along
and messed up the whole aviation economy.
>
> I know they would desperately like to keep this technology in the U.S. But their chief
engineer Larry Maurer wants to see it come to fruition so badly before he dies that he's
willing to entertain offers from about anywhere.
>
> I've accumulated a weekend's worth of e-mails from all parties -- pro's & con's. If you
want to take a look and possibly help these guys, reply back and I'll email you the emails as
an MS-Word document. Although he had some connections to DARPA, Mr. Maurer
presumed they had their "favorites" and didn't know if a similar project was being
undertaken by one of the main DOD or DOE contractors (I guess they could have read
UNITEL's patent and proceeded with covert development).
>
> If this holds as much promise as they portray it, I'd hate to see it end up in Israel or India
before the U.S.
>
> -- Mark
Mark :
I've seen Maurer's stuff in the past and I can't decide if he's a sincere crackpot or a deliberate con
artist. He likes to use big physics words and wonderful meaningless vagaries. As is usual with these
sort of things, all they need is money. As one who is somewhat in this sort of business, my philosophy
is "put up or shut up". "Make extraordinary claims? Better have extraordinary evidence."
Tom
S-071. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding other people who want to debate Jack Sarfatti
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: you are not the only one .......
Date : Wed, 14 Nov 2001 18:35:27 -0800
Mark:
I agree. But hey, someday......
At 01:56 PM 11/14/01 -0500, you wrote:
107
> ...... who wants to debate Sarfatti in a public forum. Check out below.
>
> But I still want to put Sarfatti behind us (as much as you are otherwise tempted) and focus on
getting funded; then building the prototype(s); then defining the physics as to why the things work
like they do; then use these new theories (now proven by your experiments) to optimize the design
(i.e., make smaller, require less energy, possibly use less expensive materials or simpler
manufacturing methods).
>
> From: Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@well.com>
> To: Stan Tenen <meru1@well.com>
>
CC:
Peter
Mutnick
<saint8peter@hotmail.com>,
saint7peter@hotmail.com,
ntedesco@mediaone.net,
d1494@wt.net,
GeorgeWeis@aol.com,
yokatta@oxy.edu,
eic@scitechperspectives.co.uk,
wcri@erols.com,
v.poponin@worldnet.att.net,
UriGeller@compuserve.com, WeeklyFiles@filersfiles.com, truzzi@toast.net, drtoy@drtoy.com,
karastjepan@yahoo.com, sherlight@ktc.com, senatorfrist2@nrsc.org, sirag@mindspring.com,
sanjiv@pulse-power.com,
sallyjbennett@hotmail.com,
radiant@pacbell.net,
pandolfi@zzapp.org,
Rainman@tree-o-life.org,
product@northbeachlabs.com,
purple@ingress.com,
paul@vonward.com,
vericomm@idiom.com,
mike@hia.com,
rosin@west.net, stealthskater@hotmail.com, MagickMirr@aol.com, bravehrt@concentric.net,
klaskey@gmu.edu,
K.Sullivan.MP@aph.gov.au,
Joseph207@home.com,
Karel.Havik@cec.eu.int,
johnpaul@ispwest.com,
jmkohn@sirius.com,
achenbachj@washpost.com,
joe@motionsciences.org,
jeffrey@williamjames.com,
JAmato9@aol.com, JagdishM@aol.com, hjf35@earthlink.net, schwann@webtrance.co.za,
info@taggarthouse.com,
henrym@roswell.net,
GlenL@pacbell.net,
zukav@zukav.com,
dansmith@clark.net,
Faustin
<faustin@sound.photosynthesis.com>,
Foggy
Writer
<CloudRider@aol.com>, fawolf@ix.netcom.com
>> Subject: Re: UFO propulsion in the bible (Correction and Addition)
>> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:38:37 -0800
>>
>> Stan Tenen wrote:
>>
>>> Jack,
>>> Thanks for hanging in there. It was good while it lasted. <smile> You know, I really
basically agree with you. There's only one thing I'd like to clear up.
>>>
>>> In spite of physics being the center of your universe, it's not the center of my universe.
You yell at me about what I'm suggesting not being 'physics'. I'd like you to take "yes" for an
answer. I'm not doing physics.
>>
>>Fine. But I am ONLY interested in doing physics as the method for understanding reality, the
universe, or more precisely, Super Cosmos, time and consciousness. I have zero interest and
even an aversion to ANY OTHER approach.
Why?
Because since SRI 1973
http://stardrive.org/Jack/contact.pdf to est, Esalen and after up until very recently with the Joe
Firmage ISSO/CIPA failure. I have seen good projects, good ideas driven out by the "toxic
cosmologies" (Dick Farley) of what Feynman called "Cargo Cult pseudoscience". I have seen
naive fools, too full of themselves mistaking luck for insight, get fleeced by con men, on more
than one occasion. I have seen a pernicious political agenda behind much of this. Edward Teller
said that the KGB used the UFO phenomenon and psychic research back in the 70's to "weaken
American science". Indeed British Intelligence "stringer" Dennis Bardens told me much the
same thing at the Blue Boar Inn in Cambridge in 1974 and said I was to be "in the thick of it".
108
This does not mean that there are not UFOs. However, it does mean that the Sheehan-Greer
"UFO Disclosure" and "GCP BAN SPACE WEAPONS" are part of a coordinated Fifth ColumnTrojan Horse operation against America and its allies from an unholy alliance of the old Occult
Nazi SS, rogue KGB agents all fueled by hidden money from the Third Reich, Saudi Wahhabi
money culminating in bin Ladin's al Qaeda. Steve Schwartz knows what has really been going
here. Nick Herbert's use of "Dr. Jabir", "Max Weiss", and his defense of Nazi David Irving, are
not random events, nor is the Einhorn case and many other deaths in the New Age like Robert
Anton Wilson's daughter Luna, Jean Reisser Nadal, Itzak Bentov, George Koopman, Heinz
Pagels and, it appears CIA's Harold Chipman. BTW my first contact with CIA was in 1963
when I worked at DOD contractor Ford Philco Aeronutronics in Newport Beach, CA. You will
note that the email record shows I predicted an attack on the American military in the fall of
2001 as part of UFO Disclosure-GCP BAN SPACE WEAPONS Fifth Column Trojan Horse
Operation weeks before September 11, 2001. This was clearly a remote viewing on my part
combined with some common sense. The objective email record shows I was getting
increasingly anxious and agitated about "clear and present danger to the American military" as
the weeks of August 2001 rolled by. Then on Sept 28, 2001 I found the Herman Melville quote
in Loomings in Moby Dick about contested US Presidential Elections followed by "BLOODY
WAR IN AFFGHANASTAN" sticking out like a sore thumb.
I posted this at
http://stardrive.org/title.shtml on Sept 30, 2001 weeks before New York Times of October 18,
2001 also commented on this strange synchronicity. These are all objective facts in the public
internet record. http://qedcorp.com/book/psi/hitweapon.html written by me in 1978 during
Jimmy Carter's presidency. Also see S F Chronicle article on this 1980 or 81 "Another Eccentric
Genius in North Beach" by Jerry Carroll specifically about the then KGB-est Esalen connection.
Schwartz confirmed that with even more details! See also 1986 San Francisco Chronicle Sunday
Magazine "The Buttoned Down Bohemians" - that will open your eyes! Also see Picknet and
Prince's "The Star Gate Conspiracy" though I do not endorse the political spin of that book
100%. The point is that the information is out there in published works. Some of this will be in
Schwartz's new book "The Two Faces of Islam". "Wahhabism, the Saudi sect of Islam,
represents the first and longest-lived totalitarian ideology. It outlasted Jacobinism, Leninism,
fascism, Stalinism, Nazism, and Japanese imperialism. The parallels between Wahhabi Saudism
and Nazism and Stalinism are exact. More than that I will not now say because this is the subject
of my new book, THE TWO FACES OF ISLAM. Stephen Schwartz P.S. Just got news
Kandahar has fallen!"
>>>
>>> What I'm doing is investigating some potentially neat geometry, from wherever it comes
from, including ancient philosophers who believed in spontaneous generation and other
dumb ideas. I'm trolling in murky waters, and what I dredge up is only very rarely a "chip
off the old physics block".
>>
>> Do as thou wilt. But I have no time nor interest in what you are doing there. I am not saying
it is no good, only it is not what I find exciting and interesting. Same for Gladstone's interest in
Astrology, same for all sorts of soft stuff people try to get my attention on. I am, of course,
interested in documented uncanny occult spooky sychronicities like the one above and like
others in http://qedcorp.com/pcr/pcr/sioo.html and in http://stardrive.org/Jack/contact.pdf
>>
>>> Frankly, I will read your thesis through and through, when you finish (however
temporarily) revising it,
>>
> NO! Read it in process. This is a one year project!
>>
109
>>> and when it's all in one place at one time. People ask the same of me, and I have the
same responsibility for my work.
>>
>> No -- that is not how a physics course works! One must solve problems along the way.
>>
>>> What I really appreciate is the opportunity to tilt with you in front of some interesting
people, a few of whom may actually be reading some of this. This is a pleasure. I enjoy the
stage as much as you do.
>>
>> Well, this is the last time I will waste anymore of my valuable time with you unless you do
the work in my Physics 101 as it unfolds.
>>
>>> I also regret that your knowledge of Kabbalah and Jewish tradition is so thin as to leave
you victim to the usual anti-Semitic dummying-down.
>>
>> I am not victim to any of it. I am basically not concerned with it. My only interest is my
direct contact with Carlo Suares and the connection of "Sarfatti" to Rashi des Troyes and the
David
Padwa
synchronicity
of
1980
around
it
as
described
in
http://qedcorp.com/pcr/pcr/sioo.html
>>
>>> This is sad because you're missing ideas that you might turn into insight into real
physics.
>>
>> "If it ain't broke don't fix it." This is more of your very common New Age hubris coming
through. I have a hotline, a Godphone, whatever I have to know is given to me in due time.
Maybe this is from the codons of the House of David via Rashi, maybe just a fantasy, don't
know, don't much care. It works pragmatically.
>>
>>> But I know you've got enough on your plate, and after > all, traditional stuff, even when
it has a few gems, spreads them out so they only show up very occasionally. My research is
not an efficient way to learn physics. (I'm sure that's obvious.) I really would like to attract
some help on the 6-body problem solution
>>
>> This is nonsense.
>>
>>> I'm proposing because if it is physics, it has implications which I expect would reach
your level of attention.
>>
>> Forget it.
>>
>>> I could be wrong. I'd like to know. I don't go around proposing n-body solutions -- it's
not my hobby. But when I find something that's so far-out it might even be right I have a
responsibility to wave it in front of people flying the "it's not even wrong" flag. If anyone
else would like to pick up the conversation and play in these murky waters, please do.
>>> Best,
>>> Stan
>>>
>>> Meru Foundation http://www.meru.org meru1@well.com
110
S-072. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding writing a book about the UNITEL experience
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: misc items (while they are still in my mind)
Date : Thu, 15 Nov 2001 10:46:18 -0800
At 11:52 AM 11/15/01 -0500, you wrote:
> Mr. Maurer -> Before I forget these things :
> (1) If you think UNITEL came under harsh criticism from people like Sarfatti because
their current understanding of physics couldn't mathematically back-up your claims, you
should see how they came down on legends like the Philadelphia Experiment and Montauk
Project. Most of the time they won't waste their time even ridiculing them. I'm personally
convinced events such as those actually did occur, although perhaps not at the cited
locations. You have the videotape I sent you -- check out Lazar's statement about another
project on-going at S-4 involving applied alien technology was the "physics of looking back
in time" and Corso's concluding remarks in his interview about seeing another crashed disc
involving a "time machine". I think all of these are related to UFO's via the "new physics"
which is waiting to be discovered.
>
> (2) Other experiments have produced phenomena which defy explanation under General
Relativity. Example: see the Soviet experiment using rotating magnetic fields at
http://alexfrolov.narod.ru/russearl.html .
>
> (3) Lazar's claims of 2 types of "gravity" have been met with ridicule. The site on
'plasma' at http://www.goodfelloweb.com/nature/cgbi/index.html suggests gravity may be
the result of 2 forces, an idea that Stan Deyo also put forth in his books and lectures.
Someone named "Richard Crandall" seems to back-up Lazar's gravity claims at
http://members.tripod.com/richard_Crandall . He said that they taught Lazar >the
theories backwards: that his "Gravity A" wave is actually what he refers to as "Gravity B",
and vice versa.
>
> (4) The mysterious and elusive "Levinson time equations" Nichols refers to in his books
may be "Levison" rather than "Levinson". Marshall Barnes is having a lot of trouble
tracking these down himself.
>
> (5) There may have been many UFO incidents equally or more spectacular than the ones
that have made the media (your experience most certainly included!). But of the ones
whose accounts are widely available, the one that intrigues me the most is the Bentwaters
incident. Because it involved active manipulation of time (as if they were "showing off")
and because separate UFOs "combined" to form numbers of entirely different objects.
>
> (6) You can read more details about Bentwaters near the end of the "Clear Intent" book I
photocopied for you and you should receive either today or tomorrow. Also in there are
111
official police and military "forms" for reporting UFO encounters. You will see that the
Eugene police department did you an injustice in their amateurish investigation. You'll even
see diplomatic communiqués from Kissinger to other countries regarding this topic.
>
> (7) I'm sure that you and Mike have been struggling all along to figure out the exact
physics which is responsible for the events you observed and which you will duplicate with
your prototypes. After all -- if you had it nailed down -- you wouldn't have received all this
skepticism from these mainstream folks (who don't believe in UFOs anyway). What I see
happening down-the-road is (A) you become successful with your prototypes in stages, with
each stage producing a more phenomenal event; (B) possible side-effects or whatever will
require engineering ingenuity and re-design to make the devices "people-friendly"; (C)
scientists world-wide (Sarfatti included) will finally have to admit your success and they
will be rapidly reformulating theories to come up with the "new physics" that can explain
what's happening. Some of that is already taking place with that Ekryoptic model to replace
the Inflationay part of the Big Bang -- cosmologists are finally shedding their reluctance
about accepting the notion of extra dimensions in the Universe.
>
> (8) Route some of the stuff I sent you past Mike. I'm not contending all of it is true. But
it might trigger something within him or give him a new idea. And if nothing else he'll be
brought up to "speed" on the predominant folklore that exists in the world. Good lunch
topics or stories around a campfire. The engineers I worked with at Union Carbide love to
talk about this stuff and they absolutely went CRAZY over UNITEL's website. And this
was a year ago when I don't know all that I know now concerning you.
>
>(9) I found another tidbit on one of the Montauk message boards. I think I brought it home
with me many months ago and I'm trying desperately to find it so I can post it. It regarded
Einstein's unfinished work on relating gravity to electromagnetism in his Unified Field
Theory. I found a reference to a scalar version of Maxwell's field equations which is
complete and does what Einstein intended to do with his UFT. This post also said because
of national security concerns, this has been suppressed (like they suppressed or destroyed
much of Tesla's and Reich's works).
>
> -- Mark
Hello Mark !
Thanks for the detailed info. I am pleased to hear about your writing abilities. We have a friend -UNITEL devotee -- who just graduated from UCLA Med School. His name is Paul Kirsch and he is a
freelance writer and has written for Wired magazine, Wall St. Journal, and several other mag/news
journals. He has been attempting to write an introductory magazine The Journal of Interdimensional
Travel "An Interview with UNITEL Director of Research Mike Miller on Space and Interdimensional
Travel". Paul was turned down by both Wired and WSJ in his published offering.
Paul is also assisting us in writing our autobio book Flying Colors. Perhaps you and he could hook
up or independently write a story. Would you want to take a crack at adding your editing expertise to
our book? I am way behind as I now have "Dragon" voice-activated software and have many
"reminders of incidents to write such as the time we ran into Jerry Garcia in the Bay area (when we met
Aki Tomita and Dave Froning) when Jerry said he wanted to invest $3 million into UNITEL and Mike
replied it wasn't enough as we needed $8 million. I could have strangled Mike!!!
112
Concerning the math description conflict, we are hopefully going into the prototype stage and out of
the paper stage. We want to build the high-temp paraboloidically-curved, RF-activated, free-standing
crystallite lens as soon as possible. When we burn a hole through a small mountain or melt a car to
show off our industrial potential, all the Sarfatti's of the World can step aside!
You know that I know that our system works from witnessing the system back in 1981. Forget all
the UFO stuff and whether anyone believes us or not concerning our sighting. The point is we know it
works and we will bet the farm knowing full well the outcome! We do not know who, what, or where
they came from. However, never look a gift horse in the mouth!
Can't wait to start building my friend! And when the public asks us where we got the idea, we can
just smile! :)
Best,
Larry
S-073. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding obtaining a National Institute of Health grant
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Fwd: medical contact
Date : Thu, 15 Nov 2001 22:17:07 -0800
Mark :
FYI -- Sarfatti doesn't even come close to this now does he? :)
Paul and you should hook up on a writing scheme. I mean it's a gold mine of technology that we
advance and it's just sitting here, boys. Waiting for you to enlighten the public.
Larry Maurer
>> X-Sender: pkirsh@pop.ucla.edu
>> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3
>> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 18:02:28 -0800
>> To: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
>> From: Paul Kirsch <pkirsh@ucla.edu>
>> Subject: medical contact
>> X-RCPT-TO: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
>> Hi,
>> I have a possible contact for you in terms of your medical invention. His name is Rich
Waldron. To clarify, if you want to pursue this, I would look into the NIH funded
industry/academic partnership which I believe is called the STTR grant or something. (I sent
you the website before). Now he asked me some preliminary questions, like; Do you want
him to do lab bench work testing things or do you want him to be a consultant? He said he
would have to get the approval of his supervisor. I think you would have to be well along in
the process and REALLY understand the grant process. That is, I would talk extensively with
the NIH so that you knew the process. I must warn you that is a GREAT DEAL of hard work
113
for generally little money. I may be able to help you to some extent with the grant process.
Plus it is competitive. You may have to apply several years in a row. An angle you might
look for is maybe also including some minority people in the project. If this interests you I
will give you his phone number. Again you would have to be VERY prepared as to what you
are planning to do and how you would include him. He is a young Ph.D. -- open in some
ways, but a little cautious.
>>
>> Best, Paul
S-074. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding setting UNITEL's stock prices
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Fwd: Re: New or revised stock agreement...
Date : Fri, 16 Nov 2001 17:43:40 -0800
Dear Mark :
I received the second package you sent me okay. Thanks very much. As you can see, I will be very
busy over the weekend. I shall let you know how it all turns out. Wil Zarecor is a pioneer in that he
started the first, second, and third satellite telecommunications company! He also set our stock price to
what it currently is valued at.
Sincerely,
Larry
>>>> From: WNeeley103@aol.com
>>>> Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 10:36:38 EST
>>>> Subject: New or revised stock agreement...
>>>> To: lmaurer@unitelnw.com
>>>> X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41
>>>> X-RCPT-TO: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Larry... hope all is well there... We have another round of layoffs coming,
and I might be in them...so I will say that I really do not want to put any more money
in UNITEL, but I do understand that your patent is important to keep. I'm open to
paying the remaining approximately $600, but remember that you will need another
maintenance fee next year (I'm not sure by what date) of about $1500... As you know,
I have a big issue with the share price, and I think that per the book excerpt that I just
emailed you about, and the current stock market, 0.50 cents per share is very generous.
As I have repeated, no one out here is willing to pay anything near $16.80 per share
(higher than CSCO/cisco) and although we had discussed/adopted this amount in the
previous agreement... I'm not willing to spend an extra $600 that I don't have for you
at these rates. And I also want to revise our prior rates... Here's what I want at this
time, in order to pay the $600. Hopefully you can find someone else to fund it, so that
you get better terms, but here's what I want in order to pay the $600 to Shigapat...
>>>>
>>>> Items: 1. Revise the share price of our Agreement of 10/01 to 0.50 (fifty cents)
per share. 2. Add $600 to it, so that I have invested at present $800 + $600 = $1400
114
for saving the Japanese patent. The amounts Shigapat needed are slightly lower than
this amount, but I'm rounding up. 3. Add $50 for the wire transfer fees ($25 for each
one, charged to me by my bank) $1450/0.50 = 2900 shares. 4. Add 20,000 shares for
the 2% of UNITEL stock that I own already, which is the new amount that I have
after the split. You have issued 1,000,000 shares, according to your previous email...
2% = 20,000 New certificate to be issued to me within 3 weeks after this new
agreement should show 22,900 shares. 5. Acknowledge that the 2% of issued stock
that I own remains 2% (not lower than 2%) in future stock splits. You have, I think in
prior emails, but would like you to confirm that again. Future splits can dilute the
$1400 related shares, but not the original 2%... >>6. Give Jane Joy credit for $6000
worth of stock also at 0.50 per share... i.e. 12,000 shares. New certificate to be issued
to Jane Joy within 3 weeks after this new agreement should show 12,000 shares.
Future splits can dilute the $6000 related shares. 7. If you haven't already, assign the
Japanese patent to UNITEL. It seems to be in your name per Shigapat, but any
investor is assuming your patents have been assigned, or somehow transferred so as to
be useful, to UNITEL, so that the company has some value. That's the only
enticement at present other than wow factor that we seem to have. And it will come
up in any business meeting or due diligence check from the interested in investing
party. You might lose them without them saying why at that point... I'm sorry about
this, but it's not worth doing to me at all unless as above. Let me know via email what
you want to do as soon as you can... I need to get them the $600 by 11/5 I think in
order to be within the 3 weeks Shigapat had agreed to give you as a grace period...
>>>>
>>>>-W
>>>-----Original Message---->>
>>> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
>>> To: wzarecor@bellsouth.net <wzarecor@bellsouth.net>
>>> Date: Sunday, November 04, 2001 3:01 PM
>>> Subject: Fwd: New or revised stock agreement...
>>>
>>> Wil:
>>>
>>> Just curious to what your response is to Mr. Neeley's comments about the current
value of stock, etc. I know he thinks he has us over a barrel over this Jap patent
maintenance fee and thereby showing his greedy NYC teeth, but I am curious of your
valued opinion would be. I know that drastic times calls for drastic measures but this is a
bit ridiculous. I can see cutting the price if we increase the production of shares (like John
Deere penny stock) by issuing 10 million shares at $0.50 per share. Just curious, Wil. I
know you have an answer and BTW, if you know anyone that want s a bit of our stock
PLEEZ let me know! Good luck!
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>>
>>> Larry
>>>
>>> P.S.- Enjoyed the Tali-Ban deodorant funny!
>>>
> At 07:20 PM 11/4/01 -0500, you wrote:
>
115
>> Larry:
>>
>> The common thing for venture capitalists is to devalue the company so that they get
controlling interest for nothing down and nothing a month. Essentially, it is ok with them if
they drive you out with nothing and they have it all after they have bled all possible
technology out of you. In a word, they do not care if you stay poor forever, and if making that
so enhances their wealth, that is their goal. My thought on this is: Is this good enough to go
forward with at your asking price, and if not, what is your minimum asking price? Set that
and move forward telling the VC that is your limit. If you feel strongly about your asking
price, tell him that you feel strongly about your position and that you would rather let in go in
the shitter than to go to the sharks. It is ok to call them greedy, unethical bastards because
that is what they are and they probably relish the fact that you know it but are powerless to do
anything about it.
>>
>> Ask Nature how to move this forward, how to get it funded and how to use it for the
benefit of mankind. That probably will work.
>>
>> Wil
>>
> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 17:39:41 -0800
> To: wzarecor@bellsouth.net
> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
> Subject: Re: New or revised stock agreement...
>
> Dear Wil:
>
> We have a verbal confirm on $50 million for 49% first round funding with a $1.25 billion second
round financing schedule. They do not want a chair position on the Board however they do want
one board position. They said that they are offering a 87% buy back option on their 49% ownership
after the first year. They also said that if we wanted to get a written confirm now instead of after the
new year, that we have to redo our Executive Summary to include a 5-year expenditure spreadsheet.
>
> I know you have put in a lot of effort before, Wil, and I am asking you now to see if you want to
immediately come on board as a business consultant however which way you want to proceed with
it. We just need your help now and we want to reward you for your valuable services as well. If you
could include your fee (retainer, wages, stock, etc.) along with a 5 year spreadsheet I would really
appreciate it. They said that if we can get the info to them done over this weekend that they would
have their final confirm on Monday or Tuesday of next week. Please realize that they know that this
is a "best shot attempt" by us to expedite things. They are as anxious as we are to get started as soon
as possible. I will be available all weekend for assistance and we are ready to send any and all
pertinent info to send you along with assistance from our Corporate attorney, Dennis F. Tripp and
Bryan Willoughby & Doug Blankenship who are our Corporate representatives down there in
Southern California.
>
> We are lucky to have you to advise us, Wil, and we definitely want to reward you handsomely for
your efforts here. I think you still have the old Excel spreadsheets that you did for $5 million.
Perhaps you can bump the numbers up accordingly and I shall put you directly in touch with
everyone concerned so that communication is firm. It all looks very good at this point and we are
seriously hoping we can get the correct info to them on time. I hope to hear from you as soon as
possible, Wil.
116
>
> Sincerely,
> Larry
S-075. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding the UNITEL newsletter
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: remember the UNITEL newsletter ?
Date : Sat, 17 Nov 2001 17:00:54 -0800
At 07:05 PM 11/17/01 -0500, you wrote:
> (1) Remember the option of updating people of UNITEL's progress if they registered their
email-id upon visiting the UNITEL web-site? That might be another way of passing the
word about UNITEL stock now being available. Also -- from a public relations viewpoint -it might be wise to make use of that feature if nothing more than to keep UNITEL foremost
in the public eye. You never know ... someone may have political or business connections
that you could make use of. You might want to make a committee to approve what gets sent
out. You want any released information to present UNITEL in the best light possible ... and
reviews by 2-or-3 additional people can catch unintentional errors made by one.
>
> (2) I never knew that NIH grants were that long in-the-making. I was thinking about CDC
... but then I heard it took the recent 9-11 scare to get Congress to allocate money to repair the
roofs of some of their labs which were leaking onto computers and analytical instruments.
Did you ever think of Ted Turner? I wonder if it would be possible to get a list of the
wealthiest individuals and send them an invite to buy UNITEL stock? "If the mountain won't
come to Mohammed, then ... ... ..."
>
> (3) By now you probably have read some of that material I sent. One theme continually
raises itself. Remote-viewers (doesn't have anything to do with the P-X/Montauk or UFOs)
say they can "see" future events about to around 2010-2013 and "see" after that, but they can't
"see" anything in that time period. The interview with the Puerto Rican abductee on the
videotape says that he was told by the aliens of a certain catastrophic event that would take
place in the future near his home island. And ELINT officer Dan Sherman (at my website, I
didn't send you this material) said as a NSC "intuitive communicator" he was given training
on how to maintain communications through telepathic means with the ET's after all
conventional communication would fail in the future. He was never told what this event
would be but he has formed his own opinions. All three of these items seem to be
independent of one another while at-the-same-time re-enforcing one another …
>
> -- Mark
Dear Mark:
Haven't had much luck with sugar-daddys like Paul Allen, Bill Gates, and the like. One would think
that they and Ted Turner would want to check us out thoroughly. Most likely there is a controlling
117
entity that "steers" them away to a different opportunity that either paid off these individuals or some
other reason.
I was discussing how everyone will run to us with cash in their hot little hands when we construct a
"StumpBlaster", fire it up and melt a tank on TV or some similar event. The Israelis kind of did that
with a quantum computer when they broke the Bletchly Park code in 12 milliseconds.
One would also think that since we have patents, subcontractors, and world class associates that they
would see it coming (meaning an event as above). No brainer for sure!
I especially can't believe that the local news entities totally ignoring us, for treating us like we are
from Italy or some foreign place. When we do have news-worthy happenings that everybody wants to
hear about, we will make it a point to either ignore them or make absolutely sure that they are last to get
any news from us. We will also make sure that everyone knows why too.
Does it sound like I am bitter? You betcha, Red Rider!! Let's see what the near future brings us. At
the very least, we maybe able to work out a deal with the Quantum Dot Corp. to construct our high-temp
lens and bill us with an exclusive contract offer. I feel deep down inside that once we fire that puppy up,
the World will jump in to help us with all four feet!
I have browsed through some of the materials that you sent. Interesting stuff indeed! I will read
through it when I find time. Mostly at night when I have a breather from it all. If you have any
connections with Ted Turner or anyone of that caliber, I would love to talk to him. I have had several
people that know Paul Allen and Bill Gates but nothing has come of any response yet. I suppose that a
"StumpBlaster" show where we melt a tank on TV ought to get them off their butts. Action is all
anybody understands.
Thanks again for sending all the important and interesting material. I will keep you posted on our
progress!
Regards,
Larry Maurer
UNITEL, Inc.
S-076. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding P-R & promotional materials
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: use 'em or lose 'em
Date : Sat, 17 Nov 2001 18:41:45 -0800
At 08:35 PM 11/17/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Dear Mr. Maurer ->
> One way is to appeal to the profit motive. Another way is to appeal to destiny / a vision / a
legacy and a new beginning for man. I'll put together a rough draft of this and send it to you.
It could have an audience other than the standard money-movers and military/political
118
bigwigs. The "trick" may be in just how you present your cause -- rather than appeal to logic,
appeal to something more -- something that defies logic ... something that almost appears godlike. Appeal to the dreamers, the visionaries, the lost souls who want to leave an "autograph"
of their human existence. I may do that tomorrow ... I need to be in a reflective, philosophical
mood.
>
> If you do make use of the email-id's you have accumulated, there are several "Mail-Merge"
programs out there. I've used MS-Word to create the form letters and email them out
automatically after filling-in appropriate 'blanks' with data I populated in MS-Excel
spreadsheets. I can create examples and email them to you should you decide to use them.
It's a waste not to use those IDs that have been sent by people interested in UNITEL. Like
air-to-air missiles ... "use them or lose them !"
>
> -- Mark
Mark :
Hey! Thanks a zillion for the iron-ons! Man-o-lito manno! We got hats and stuff this would be
great to do t-shirts with etc.!
Incidentally, I got several .jpg's & .gif's of facts to back up our design similar to the one attached.
There is a big reason for the RGB lens beyond just producing a true EM wavepacket (Ray Chiao) as it
relates to the "color force" (i.e., the force between quarks). It leaves gravity (that everyone seems to be
searching for) in the dust! I have much more information to send you to add to all the collection. Let
me know.
Best,
Larry
119
S-077. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding potential partner in a Spain-based business
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Fwd: UNITEL, Inc.
Date : Sun, 18 Nov 2001 21:19:31 -0800
>
> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 21:18:15 -0800
> To: pathfinder@mindspring.com
> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
> Subject: Fwd: UNITEL, Inc.
>
> Bryan:
>
>Shades of Christopher Columbus, Bryan? Check out what this guy is into: fractional charge,
excitons, Hall Plateau effect, on and on! Scary dude!!! Where is Queen Isabella? Nina, Pinta, Santa
Maria....
http://www.uam.es/departamentos/ciencias/fisicateoricamateria/especifica/hojas/palacios.html
.
>
>God works in mysterious ways, my friend. Welcome to the real new world!! Spain's chance to be
on top once again!! Everyone else can take a flying ______!
>
120
>Larry
>
>> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 21:12:52 -0800
>> To: palacios@kim.fmc.uam.es
>> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
>> Subject: UNITEL, Inc.
>>
>>Dear Mr. Palacios:
>>
>> I have just now noticed that your research is very similar to our research in fractional charged
materials (in our case niobium spheres) and excitons. We have a patented RF activated laser lens
that will produce and trap excitonic bi-gasses and hopefully produce a room-temperature BoseEinstein condensate state in our projected laser beam plasma. We are working with various
universities and private corporations to construct our laser system. We hope that you will take
interest in our project as there are many similarities between your research and our (cadmium
sulfide/cadmium telluride/glass) crystallite laser lens.
>>
>> We have an international patent on the basic generic design with 10 claims on this system and
you may possibly be of great assistance to us in evaluating and refining our system in the main
goal of producing a gigantic electron-hole pair with our aerospace propulsion system so that we
may perform macroscopic quantum tunneling (MQT). We are aware of the WKB approx. that
states that the tunneling mechanism on a macroscopic scale is zero but, however, we have the
math (from our esteemed associate Yoshinari Minami) proving that if we can produce our
desired sate (exciton BEC) then we may be allowed to tunnel on a Macroscopic scale which will
in turn allow our space vehicle to traverse vast distances in outer space.
>>
>> Our design has received much attention from top aerospace research firms. It may be
possible that we can provide funding, perhaps matching funds from government grants, etc. We
have recently involved Applied Sciences (Cedarville, OH) who will be our
subcontractor/manufacturer in various forthcoming prototype construction and testing projects.
Our project with Rolls Royce is to experiment with our exterior charged capped-cone or teardrop shaped smartskin fuselage constructed out of niobium-titanium with fractional 1/3 charged
surface.
>>
>> We were to receive funding from Rolls Royce Ltd. to provide funding for Applied Sciences
until the recent tragedy that caused a drastic deficit in the airline industry economy. We have
been informed by Rolls Royce that they intend to reactivate their proposed research program as
soon as their budget allows. We are also interested in discussing the possibility of developing a
mutual project with the A. Paul Alisvostos Labs to develop a free-standing, high-temperature IIVI compound crystallite RF activated laser lens.
Please visit our website at
http://www.unitelnw.com . We are quite certain our design is feasible and your research is very
close to what we are working with. I hope to hear from you soon to discuss further the
possibilities we can present to add to our mutual benefit of exploring research in crystallite
and/or quantum dot lenses and their applications. Thank you,
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Larry D. Maurer, Principal
>> & Director, Engineering
>> UNITEL, Inc.
>> (503) 232-2740
121
>> www.unitelnw.com
S-078. from Jack Sarfatti regarding Zero-Point technology
From : Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@well.com>
To : William Mandel <wmmmandel@earthlink.net>, Stephen Schwartz <karastjepan@yahoo.com>,
Doctor Jibar Rish <quanta@mail.cruzio.com>, Foggy Writer <CloudRider@aol.com>, Mata Hari Von
Brownie <rosin@west.net>, "meyerlinhart@rcn.com" <meyerlinhart@rcn.com>, "mg@verbum.com"
<mg@verbum.com>,
Mike
Coyle
<vericomm@idiom.com>,
"MindForms@cs.com"
<MindForms@cs.com>,
"Missouf@aol.com"
<Missouf@aol.com>,
"mjez@sover.net"
<mjez@sover.net>, "moc@global-vision.org" <moc@global-vision.org>, "mosca@optonline.net"
<mosca@optonline.net>, [ … … … ]
Subject : Bernie Haisch, Hal Puthoff, Ken Shoulders & Zero Point Technology
Date : Sat, 17 Nov 2001 13:02:45 -0800
Memorandum For The Record
Advanced Intelligence Agency
Subject: Mining Quantum Oil and Stealth Space Weaponry
Physics note to still shorter list on the real truth behind Joe Firmage's recent "Motion Sciences" and
the potential to harness quantum vacuum energy for space-time travel.
General Douglas Mac Arthur at close of "Duty, Honor, Country" West Point speech talks of
"harnessing the cosmic energy" in the context of a coming war in space. Attempts to ban US Military
and our allies in space is a Trojan Horse that will lead to the defeat of America and the Free World if we
are not vigilant.
The problem here is that this issue, like the development of the atomic and hydrogen bomb, has
become a political hot potato with New Age CNWP propagandists hijacking it for their Trojan Horse
objective to "weaken American science" (Edward Teller) using slogans like "UFO Disclosure" and
"BAN SPACE WEAPONS" that echoes "BAN THE BOMB" from the 60's & 70's. Indeed some of the
same people then are still doing the same thing, misinformation and disinformation, that "useful idiots"
and "agents of influence" have always done in covert psychological warfare operations to win the hearts
and minds of the the masses especially in democracies like ours. A good example of this is Gary Zukav
being placed in the strategic position of Oprah's Guru spreading the CNWP line to millions.
OK, what are the actual physics facts and prospects? No one knows how to use quantum vacuum
zero point energy. I exclude alleged possible advanced ET civilizations here. I mean no humans know
how. The claims by Danny Sheehan and Steve Greer that U.S. "black operations" has Zero-Point
Energy anti-gravity propulsion technology on the shelf is completely bogus anti-American propaganda
to get the brigades of New Age Marching Morons into the streets to obstruct the American Military and
their contractors.
There are intriguing "electron charge cluster" experiments by Ken Shoulders -- a retired very
important microwave micro-miniature gadgeteer with US Intelligence and a pioneer in the computer
chip revolution. He and Harold Puthoff worked together for several years in the US Intelligence
Community in 60's, I believe? I worked with Ken at ISSO in the group that I put together for Joe
Firmage with ongoing background communications to CIA scientist Ron Pandolfi and Col. John
Alexander (nonlethal weapons now at NIDS), physicist Eric Davis also at NIDS and other U.S.
122
Intelligence connected people). I arranged for Creon Levit to take a leave from NASA to be day-to-day
director of all science-engineering activities. John Brandenberg (CIA technical consultant), Saul-Paul
Sirag, Vladimir Poponin from Moscow, Eldon Byrd (ret US Navy physicist), and others (including a key
Southern California defense contractor that we gave over a million dollars to {name classified} ) were
part of this effort to evaluate "over unity" free energy and "UFO" propellent-less propulsion claims ALL OF WHICH WERE BOGUS! Not even one passed Creon Levit's and Ken Shoulders's careful
lab tests. Not suffering fools gladly with the diplomacy of the real "Force", The Schwartz , rightly
lambasting Bill Mandel, I did not have patience to deal with the obvious New Age crackpots including
BTW Joe, our Wonder Boy with the money (though frequently late and not as promised in many cases)
parading through the ISSO door at Henry Dakin's 3220 Sacramento Street in Presidio Heights, San
Francisco. If Creon looks prematurely aged, now you know why. :-)
The Humpty Dumpty Problem
Getting back to real physics: the electron charge cluster (Humpty Dumpty) is a tiny apparently hollow
egg shell of approximately a hundred billion to a trillion electrons that stays together for observable
times, maybe a few microns or so across. The paradox is that this should not happen because the
electrons repel each other. The charge cluster makes a small enough cavity so that the, some times
attractive, Casimir force from the zero point quantum vibrations of "virtual nonclassical" light in the
vacuum, might be the glue holding the charge cluster together. Indeed, Hal Puthoff claims to have a
mathematical model showing how this works. I have not seen it yet and I am skeptical for reasons I
explain below.
Now we come to Bernie Haisch's note below. I give now my perspective based on the mathematics in
http://stardrive.org/Jack/Cosmo1.pdf .
see also http://stardrive.org/Jack/contact.pdf .
http://stardrive.org/title.shtml
http://qedcorp.com/pcr/pcr/sioo.html
PCW Davies is a good mainstream physicist, but he is not in touch with recent breakthroughs. The
correct idea is not "Liquid Space" but "Superfluid Quantum Vacuum" precipitating out, like ice in water,
the "World Crystal" (Hagen Kleinert, Berlin) of Einstein's classical theory of general relativity of gravity
as curved spacetime. Indeed, this is what Russian visionary physicist, Andre Sakharov, was really
talking about. The zero point friction contribution to inertia 'm' in F = ma and E = mc^2 that Bernie
pushes is only then a small "normal liquid" correction to the much larger "superfluid" effect. Puthoff
and Haisch et-al completely miss this superfluid which is the essential part of the story. This is ironic
since CIPA physicist Giovanni Modanese had a dim glimpse of the needed missing idea when he tried to
explain some odd experiments in which rotating superconductors seem to show a small antigravity lift.
This work was partly sponsored by NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Project under Dan Goldin's watch.
We now jump back 100 years to 1900. The pressing problem was the blackbody radiation. Classical
physics said there should be infinite energy radiated as we pass from brain waves to radio to microwave
to infrared to visible to ultraviolet to X rays to gamma rays and beyond. In fact the energy radiated is
finite of course. Max Planck had to introduce the famous quantization of energy E into indivisible
quanta given in E = hf .
123
E = energy of a "particle"
f = frequency of a "wave"
h = Planck's quantum of action ~ 10-27 erg-seconds (energy x time = momentum x
space).
Einstein added to this in 1905 using E=hf to explain the photoelectric effect in which light hitting metals
generates an electric current. We face a similar problem today with the zero point energy. The theory
used by Haisch, Puthoff and others is wrong because it has a very similar effective infinity called the
cosmological constant paradox, which BTW no one understood until my recent discovery explained
below. Puthoff tries to hand wave the problem away, but what he suggests in wrong as shown on p.25-6
of the Cal Tech textbook Cosmological Physics by John Peacock (Cambridge Press).
The simple fact is that the zero point energy (ZPE) of the quantum vacuum makes a huge cosmological
constant
/\(ZPE) = 10+66 (centimeters)-2
Not only that but also this ZPE must anti-gravitate! This fact is apparently not known to Puthoff and
Haisch&co since I have never heard them mention it. It is a well-known result at Cal Tech if not at
CIPA. :-)
In fact, the actual measured value is approximately /\ = 10-56 (centimeters)-2 which is a whopping 121
powers of 10 smaller (give-or-take a few powers of 10 which don't much matter).
This result is known to every Cal Tech schoolboy under Kip Thorne's tutelege. Intel's Gordon Moore
just gave Cal Tech 600 million dollars and rightly so -- a good decision.
The cosmological constant /\ was introduced by Einstein to prevent his universe model from expanding!
Then Hubble in the 1920s found that the Universe really did expand (i.e., /\ ~ 0). Einstein shouted "Ach!
Gott in himmel! I am a stupid Dumbkopf. This was my greatest blunder!"
In fact, we know today that /\ really is there but it is close to zero on the average because of the
superfluid quantum vacuum!
The real formula is
/\ = /\(ZPE)[1 - Lp3|Psi|2]
where /\(ZPE) = 1/Lp2
Lp2 = Planck area = fundamental unit of cosmic quantum information of the "World Crystal". This
can also be thought of as a kind of "hologram" as explained by Hawking in The Universe in a
Nutshell that he wrote for Squirrels! :-)
Superfluids have giant quantum information waves in them. That's what 'Psi' is. Psi is a complex
number and a local field in space and time. It is a little arrow or single handed clock attached to each
event in space and time. The position of the watch hand is called the "phase". It is the direction in
which the arrow points in an information space beyond space and time attached to each such event in
space and time.
|Psi| is the length of the arrow which you can control because it is coupled to the phase. That is, the
length of the arrow and its orientation in information space are not independent of each other and are
124
controllable by electromagnetic technology. This latter discovery was by Cambridge's Brian Josephson
who received the Nobel Prize for it.
Once we realize this (based on work I did in the 1960s that I was recently reminded of by Saul-Paul
Sirag and others), we then not only explain why /\ ~ 0 (i.e., 10-56 cm-2) on the average, we also explain 2
other recently observed effects. Antigravity "quintessence" - expansion of the acceleration of the
Universe (i.e., /\ > 0) in a large scale fluctuation and gravitating "dark matter" (i.e., /\ < 0) in a small
scale fluctuation. So we get a Big Bang for a small buck.
Since the quantum vacuum stress-energy density tensor of Einstein's general relativity is Tuv(quantum
vacuum) = (c/Lp2)/\ , it is now clear how to "harness the cosmic energy" (General MacArthur) by
varying Psi in small regions of space and time. We can pump energy ("quantum oil") out of the vacuum
for propellent-less propulsion and how to suck it into the vacuum to hide a sonic boom and to prevent
radar reflections for stealth airplanes, ships, and submarines.
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
> SHORTER LIST - USE THIS LIST NOT EARLIER ONES
> I am attempting to accommodate people who contacted me and will change subject line to make it
easier.
>
> The Morning News
>
> "This is the Army, Mr. Jones."
>
> Just in from Bernie Haisch to Joe Firmage:
>
>> Hi Joe,
>> Paul Davies has an article "Liquid Space" about what he is now calling the quantum ether in
the 3 November New Scientist. I just discovered to my surprise that he mentions CIPA by name
in discussion of work on inertia. He concludes by saying, fairly enough, "Although few
scientists have so far accepted this claim, the possibility is tantalizing." So we are starting to get
independent notice and name recognition. None of us around here had anything to do with the
article. It was a pleasant surprise I stumbled across just now.
>> Bernie
>>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>> Dr. Bernard Haisch
>> California Institute for Physics & Astrophysics
>> 366 Cambridge Ave.
>> Palo Alto, CA 94306
>> ------------------>> Director, California Institute for Physics & Astrophysics (CIPA)
>> Scientific Editor, The Astrophysical Journal
>> phone: 650-327-6284 ext. 205, fax: 650-327-6294
>> email: <haisch@calphysics.org>, alternate: <haisch@motionsciences.org>
>> http://www.calphysics.org, http://motionsciences.org
>
>Background information: Bernie Hasich and Harold Puthoff are leading a valid effort to extract the
enormous quantum vacuum energy - much bigger than nuclear energy! Problem is that a large
125
number New Age Cargo Cult pseudo-scientists who are patsies for the Commun-Nazi-Wahhabi
Party Agenda in the form of "UFO Disclosure" and Global Peace Network "BAN SPACE
WEAPONS" movement, have hijacked this legitimate physics research exactly like the Taliban-al
Qaeda Wahhabi fundamentalists have hijacked Islam. So beware. There is an enormous amount of
disinformation and misinformation about "zero point energy", "antigravity" and "UFOs" on the
internet and elsewhere invoking the names of "Haisch", "Puthoff", "Shoulders", "Sarfatti" and
others.
>
>What Haisch refers to above is the attempt to explain the origin of inertia, i.e. > the 'm' in Newton's
"F = ma" and in Einstein's "E = mc2" as I kind of "friction" through the wild quantum fluctuations of
light. This is an interesting topic I will discuss more later. Young Joe Firmage -- who had a direct
contact with seemingly benevolent "beings of light" (he is a descendent of Brigham Young of the
Mormons) -- made a lot of money on the Internet Bubble and was the main financial supporter of
CIPA until he went bust not only from the bursting of the Internet Bubble but also mainly from bad
decisions on who to support allocating most of his millions not to bona-fide physics research like
Haisch's but to other nonscientific and pseudoscientific causes and badly conceived media projects.
S-079. from Jack Sarfatti to Stan Tenen
From : Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@well.com>
To : Stan Tenen <meru1@well.com>
CC : Peter Mutnick <saint8peter@hotmail.com>, saint7peter@hotmail.com, ntedesco@mediaone.net,
d1494@wt.net,
GeorgeWeis@aol.com,
yokatta@oxy.edu,
eic@scitechperspectives.co.uk,
wcri@erols.com,
v.poponin@worldnet.att.net,
UriGeller@compuserve.com,
WeeklyFiles@filersfiles.com,
truzzi@toast.net,
drtoy@drtoy.com,
karastjepan@yahoo.com,
sherlight@ktc.com,
senatorfrist2@nrsc.org,
sirag@mindspring.com,
sanjiv@pulse-power.com,
sallyjbennett@hotmail.com, radiant@pacbell.net, pandolfi@zzapp.org, Rainman@tree-o-life.org,
purple@ingress.com, paul@vonward.com, vericomm@idiom.com, mike@hia.com, rosin@west.net,
stealthskater@hotmail.com, MagickMirr@aol.com, bravehrt@concentric.net, klaskey@gmu.edu,
K.Sullivan.MP@aph.gov.au, Joseph207@home.com, [ … … …]
Subject : Re: UFO propulsion in the bible (Correction and Addition)
Date : Sun, 18 Nov 2001 08:47:12 -0800
Stan Tenen wrote:
> [Stan, current]
> … I don't either. My point is that _buried inside_ the religious mumbo gumbo, there could
very well be some serious math and low-res, but decent, physics. But wait until I prove it
before you believe me. <smile>
That does not interest me. It's a bad bet. One only has limited time. I am making extraordinarily
rapid progress NOW with scientifically falsifiable definite solutions to most of the big physics
paradoxes of today including getting energy from vacuum, propellent-less propulsion, time travel, Star
Gates, how matter generates consciousness, why cosmological constant is so small on the average,
"exotic" quintessence, dark matter, why electrons and quarks are strings at h/mc yet look like points in
scattering.
Meantime you have been putzing around for years with no real results about physics, Hal and Bernie
have been putzing around for years on same ideas with no dramatic results really, nothing related to
126
ANY of the above only hand waving and wistful dreams as far as I can see. Even the charge clusters
have been in a stalemate for at least 10 years. I have yet to see Hal's calculations on them. I have since
found out, from a completely reliable source, that several people in the government damaged their
careers about ten years ago on the charge clusters and that investors lost a lot of money. Therefore, what
Hal Fox is promoting on zero point energy with charge clusters is very suspicious.
>> [Stan, previous]
>> Maybe. But how do I find out, if I don't ask?
>>
>> My "Godphone" runs 4-D dynamic simulations.
So what? That's old stuff. It's not really important for the pressing problems of the day! I presume you
mean 5-D Kaluza-Klein spacetime with a 4-D space since a dynamic simulation of 4D spacetime is
meaningless!
>>>
>>>[Jack, previous] How do you know you are not fooling yourself?
>
> [Stan, current:] Several ways. When I was watching the 4-D projections at the Geometry Center
in Minneapolis a number of years ago, I was able to see where the simulations were going before the
computer got there. I called them out before they appeared on the screen.
Fine. But so what? Again that kind of math is 100 years old or more and then what?
>
> [Stan, current:] I know because I constantly vet my insights, and because I don't believe any
of it until something objective happens. (I also try to ask serious professional physicists to
double-check what I find, and to help to pull real physics out of my intuition. Thus, my request
for help on the 6-body problem. My brain says this works. But that doesn't mean physicists will
agree. <smile>)
Wake up, Stan. No one is interested in the "6-body problem". Also what exactly do you mean by it?
Physicists are interested in the N-body problem and mean precise things by it. Give your precise
definition of the word-string "6-body problem".
S-080. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Zero-Point Energy
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: Sarfatti on: Bernie Haisch, Hal Puthoff, Ken Shoulders & Zero Point Technology
Date : Mon, 19 Nov 2001 16:28:50 -0800
Mark :
Even the "lowly one" (meaning me) understand how (at least) our spaceship design works with the
ZPE. And Puthoff not only agrees but also will be working with us once we get funding to do so.
127
Mainly the ZPE is where particles are spawned from albeit they last for only a minute amount of time,
then disappear back into the quantum foam.
An electron also "borrows" energy from the ZPE in order to tunnel. The ZPE, due to the dielectric
force that permeates our Universe that splits everything into north-south, plus-minus pairs. That is why
we are attempting to fool Mother Nature into thinking that we are just another particle pair (albeit an
exciton or electron-hole pair). This will allow interaction with the ZPE. The electron cluster they speak
of is a crude example of the gigantic BEC excitonic state which we intend to produce.
Besides, as you know, we did reverse-engineering to discover the "why" of this giving us a vast edge
over these huffy, over-egoed know-it-alls!
Make sense? I talked to the Quantum Dot Corp. today and they are scrutinizing our crystallite laser
lens design as I write. Good luck!
Larry Maurer
S-081. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding making slow progress to success
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: you're the "Master" !
Date : Mon, 19 Nov 2001 18:49:53 -0800
At 08:46 PM 11/19/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Mr. Maurer ->
> It sure does make more sense to me when YOU explain it (without the math, keeping it
simple like you do). For some intuitive reason, I can see your "logic" in fooling Mother
Nature. I mean, in a roundabout way I can understand where you're coming from. It's a gut
feeling I have.
>
> In an effort to drum up domestic backing, I've passed the word of UNITEL's plight to some
notables. Note that some of these are skeptical "extraordinary claims require extraordinary
proof" types. One was Tom Mahood, who is working on new propulsion concepts today.
Last year he told me (in a rare email) he didn't know how to "take" you -- as sincere-butmisguided or as a con man. I have tried to convince that him a "con man" wouldn't put forth
so much above-board effort as you have. If it's any comfort Tom regards Sarfatti as "bright"
and entertaining but feels his brand of physics fails every key test. Tom has industrial and
some intelligence connections; so even if he alerts others to you (good or bad), the word has
gotten out! He came down too hard on Lazar, who made a mistake by claiming he actually
worked on some things when he was probably just passing along reports he had heard from
co-workers.
>
> Dave Kauble is an engineer and maintains http://www.debshome.com . Even Richard
Boylan -- who initially suspected UNITEL was a form of disinformation along the lines of
"WingMakers" -- grudgingly admitted it may be legit and "well, tell them to call me when they
128
get ready to launch it". That took about 5 email exchanges to get him to admit he may be
wrong in his initial stance. I'm sure you have been battered like this almost every day.
>
> What-the-hell ... it can't get more worse or frustrating than what you've been through up-tonow. I'm ringing all the doorbells I can find. Even using our country's re-awakened
patriotism in a plea to keep this technology here in the U.S. (Once I'm convinced I'm on the
right path, I'm not above playing "dirty"!)
>
> You realize that a commercial t-shirt shop can do a lot better job on the iron-on's than I did.
For one, I was limited to 8x10" max size that my HP inkjet printer could accommodate. I
used MS-Word and made ample use of "text boxes" to position the images. It just gives a
commercial designer of what to start with. You could make shirts for only the quantum
computer or NMR/proton-beam applications. Or one having all of them (interstellar craft
included).
>
> The UFO material I sent you should give you an idea of how various reports were received
and "accepted" by authorities and the media. So you won't make the same "mistake" that
some other well-intentioned soul did. It should also reassure you that you are NOT alone in
your experience. (What did you think about the UFOs tampering with the guidance systems
of Minuteman missiles at Loring and Malstrom?) Hopefully someday after all your efforts &
dreams come to fruition, you'll have time to put together some videotapes on these
applications of cutting-edge physics (withOUT the math!) for physics-challenged people like
me.
>
> -- Mark
Thanks for your valued support, Mark!
You know the juxt of what "they" (whoever they were or are) showed us when the small vehicle
came down was the red, green, & blue transparent curved lens. That has been the most difficult to
understand over all of these years. I too can't wait to create films, etc. to enlighten the public to our
design and our sighting experiences.
Until then, unfortunately, we must construct a successful working prototype and that is exactly why I
contacted the Quantum Dot Corp. to discuss them constructing our lens. Hopefully, we are underway to
being successful.
The proof will be in the putting here, my friend. I can't wait to fire that pup up. RGB wavepackets
are true EM wavepackets as Chiao pointed out and it will be exciting to experiment with this out-of-this
world technology! Can you see why we are using the RGb lens with the .jpg I sent you? That's right out
of recent Nobel prize winner Dr. Gerard t'Hoofts,. U. of Utrecht, ND hadron string description.
You are starting to understand how our reverse-engineered system works. And no -- I am not a
"con:. I just have a brilliant physics expert for a fellow inventor business partner trying to explain what
we saw and how the craft works. Along the way, we have a design for a quantum computer, patents in
several countries (especially Japan who are much more stringent than the U.S.) with 10 claims, several
esteemed world-class associates, world-class subcontractors, and many highly educated supporters and
devotees (including yourself). I defy anybody to claim any part of what we are doing as a con!
Well, tonight we may have some funding. But we certainly have to keep the irons in the fire. We
need funding on any level and we welcome any small investors. We just can't solicit because of SEC
129
regulations. However, we can accept offers. We have tried our best to do everything legal and
conscientiously correct (meaning we haven't sold out to N.Korea, Iraq, China and the like). Someday
people like Sarfatti will appreciate that!
Stay tuned!
Larry Maurer
S-082. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a recent UFO case at Malstrom AFB
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: you're the "Master" !
Date : Mon, 19 Nov 2001 20:04:37 -0800
Mark:
Concerning your question of what I thought of UFOs tampering with the guidance systems of
Minuteman missiles at Loring and Malstrom, check out the following article which may or may not be a
hoax. The USAF won't answer to our questions either way:
> Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1998 11:42:34 -0800
> From: Mitch Battros <earthcng@earthlink.net>
> Reply-To: earthcng@earthlink.net
> Organization: Earth Changes
> To: Mitch Battros <earthcng@earthlink.net>
> Subject: Earth Changes TV/breaking news-UFO reported by NASA contractor
>
> NASA Contractor reports UFO over Montana...11/3/98
>
> RONAN, MONTANA - UFO reported by several hundred witnesses and two local papers over
the Mission Valley in western Montana. The sightings began 10-16-1998 and have continued at
various intervals and various durations since up to this report filing of 10-31-1998. They have
occurred somewhere between the hours of 2AM and 5AM on non pattern evenings.
>
> The UFO is roughly located above the immense Mission Mountain Range hovering in place at
approximately 20,000 feet above sea level and 9,000 feet above the top of the Mission Range. It
is reported as of this writing by more than 500 witnesses including professional, police personnel
who have gone on record, night-shift workers, travelers, and locals as well as others in
witnessing these unknown-origin craft.
>
> The UFO is reported to be quite large with one continuous red light; a flickering (but not
blinking) green light; and a flickering blue glow that appears under the craft. Outline and shape
has been undetermined at this time for the UFO.
>
> The primary locale for observation of the craft has been in-and-around areas of Polson
Montana -- a town of 6,000 that is located 10 miles north of the town of Ronan. At Ronan, a
large manufacturing facility is located 2 miles south of the town off Highway 93 which runs
north and south as does the Mission Range itself and the valley that lays below to the west of the
range.
130
>
> At this manufacturing facility, many of the night shift have been observing the UFO in the
same location and time for the last week or more. Scott Johnson (night shift foreman for the
manufacturing company) has brought his entire night shift outside on the east side of the facility
to observe the craft during breaks on various evenings. Mr. Johnson has stated when interviewed
that "this is not a vehicle of known origin. Its behavior, its ability to hover as it does, it's
soundless in that it is strictly visual, all make for something that is not 'natural' by our standards
of known air vehicles."
>
> On the latest night of observation (10/30/1998), there were two of the UFOs roughly at the
same altitude but approximately 9 miles apart. No one has seen the vehicles appear or have
noted when they leave. They are just there when they are noticed and after several hours they
are gone. Conditions in the area have been cloudless, clear, and cold temperatures. There has
been no other air craft in the area at the time of the UFOs presence over the entire 700 square
mile area of the Mission Valley where the observations have been reported from. The only
contingent element is the fact Malstrom Air Force Base is exactly due east of the sighting
location for the UFOs at 200 miles.
>
> A further report excerpted from the two local papers that have covered the sightings in depth as
well as further observations of the UFOs as they appear in upcoming nights will be posted and
filed here accordingly.
> END
> Reported by:
> Robert A.M. Stephens
> STILLWATER MILLS
> Contractor, NASA
> Shuttle Documentation Program
> St. Ignatius, Montana
> sti3818@montana.com <mailto:sti3818@montana.com>
>
> Submitted by Nancy L. Houser-Young, Newcastle,WY
> Editor of Earth News Newsletter, Seattle WA
> http://www.earthchangesTV.com
S-083. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL
Experiences"
regarding Stephen Greer and "Out-of-Body
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: a "Time Displacement" system
Date : Tue, 20 Nov 2001 13:20:13 -0800
At 12:50 PM 11/20/01 -0500, you wrote:
>
> I was at that Argentina-based "time travel" site. Most everything there is based on out-ofbody experiences when you pin them down. A lot of their experimenters' circuits originate
from Steven Gibbs (whose stuff doesn't work for anybody). I did come across a document
that seemed out-of-place for that site. Very theoretical. I don't understand it a bit. Some new
form of radiation (Cerenkov) involved ... sounds like Star Trek.
131
>
> What caught my attention was a reference to laser fusion. I remember Bob Lazar thought
such a concept was "stupid". Then as I was copying the .htm page over into a Word
document, I came across some other terms which I thought I recognized from past emails with
you. In case you're interested I'm attaching this document.
>
> -- Mark
Thanks Mark !
I really get turned off by those "mind-control" and "out-of-body experience" people. That's basically
all that Dr. Steven Greer had to offer at the luncheon he invited me to attend here in Portland this last
summer.
At the luncheon, Dr. Greer and several of his cronies barely wanted to hear my story. I had to tell
about our sighting while I showed everyone at the dinner table my model of our spaceship. All they
wanted to talk about was their mental ESP connection they had going with UFOs and that they wanted
to fertilize that experience they all had in common.
I was ready to puke! I couldn't stand their whole mental bullshit deal they were milking the public
with their meetings they charged the public $5 dollars to attend. What a rip-off! Greer was acting
sheepish when he talked to me like he was almost sorry that he invited me to attend that bunch of
weirdos when I am an engineer with a patent and a design for something real!
I don't want to cut you off short here as I really appreciate your interest in our project. I think you
have a lot of "smarts" and are right in your searching for the truth. I just do not want to have anything at
all to do with these "out-of-body" folks. Period!
Regards,
Larry
S-084. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding others "copying" quantum tunneling
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: you're the "Master" !
Date : Tue, 20 Nov 2001 13:27:19 -0800
At 01:29 PM 11/20/01 -0500, you wrote:
> This site http://www.angelfire.com/electronic/ftadefy/ was also mentioned at that Argentina
time site. Their "prototype" (nothing like your's, more pie-in-the-sky) reminded me of the
Incunabula "egg" except this is designed more for time travel. Apparently "Quantum
Tunneling" is one of the cool buzzwords nowadays.
Mark:
Yes! And we are the pioneers of MQT!
132
It's difficult to get recognition, though. However the IAA-IAF org including STAIF give us credit
for tunneling. I have some papers on the subject. One by Jerry Bales who virtually will not
acknowledge our existence. Almost like we are outsiders (like Communist sympathizers or something)!
He has some interesting facts to add to our MQT proposal that maybe you would like to see. Jerry's
email addy is "quark137" -- a definite rip-off from us as we were talking quarks and 137 back in 1982!
It's a hard and arduous road we travel, my friend! Anyway, thanks for the valued info! Have a
Happy Thanksgiving!
Larry
S-085. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a new configuration for the UNITEL craft
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: "Old" versus "New"
Date : Fri, 23 Nov 2001 21:32:53 -0800
At 05:01 PM 11/21/01 -0500, you wrote:
>(1) That "Star Chamber" site is supposedly based in Great Britain and they are planning to
test something in 2002. It doesn't seem physically big enough to generate the power
necessary to achieve those quantum effects necessary to "tunnel" . Maybe it doesn't have to
be ...
>
>(2) In its <links> section => http://www.angelfire.com/electronic/ftadefy/links/weblk.htm ,
it listed a link to that "Jerry" site you told me about. I didn't check it out. Do you want me to
send in UNITEL's site? I'm not sure he'll get it if he's stopped taking emails (that sounds
awful funny to me).
>
>(3) When I read all your emails explaining the overall physics of how the UNITEL craft
will work, and then read descriptions of other proposed machines (like the "Time
Displacement" attachment I sent you), these are B-I-G machines! A major, Major
undertaking. I can see why building the basic prototype to prove these quantum states can be
generated is so important now. Do you ever think it's a race between all companies to see
who can build one of these "prototypes" first? I don't know why so many companies &
agencies are turning a 'blind eye' to it since I'm seeing more of these all-the-time. Unless
they've run into stumbling blocks of their own and they're sitting back waiting to see who can
figure them out first.
>
>The underlying physics describing these projects seem (at first glance) different than the
rumored P-X and Montauk and Incunabula legends. Unless they achieved their claimed
results with what they called "neutrino vortexes" and you are now calling Bose-Einstein room
temperature condensates. You never told me if you thought any of those projects occurred,
even in part or under different names. They would have to have done it more by "brute force"
because they didn't have any of today's exotic materials and semiconductors. Could that have
been possible?
133
>
>(4) There does seem to be some vague link between consciousness and these quantum
states/effects. I remember Corso saying the craft appeared to be some sort of physical
extension/manifestation of its inhabitants -- no visible controls. It reminds you of that great
forerunner of science fiction movies -- Forbidden Planet -- and "monsters from the ID".
Where the possessive father's unconscious mind was controlling banks and banks of power
generators to create unstoppable forces that manifested themselves physically.
>
> -- Mark
Mark:
Here is a copy of a letter to Yoshinari Minami from my physics expert and business partner/coinventor Mike Miller for your review as I thought you may enjoy reading it:
> I have been working for more than a year on the design of a large disc-shaped spacecraft
that incorporates the UNITEL propulsion system in a new configuration. This superluminal
interstellar drive generates an effectively massive rotating magnetic field that will produce
both a region of increased space-time metrical curvature surrounding the vehicle and a region
of decreased space-time curvature inside the spaceship. This will be accomplished by
generating a special 4-dimensional toroidal field -- the "hole" in the torus being the volume
occupied by the spaceship.
>
> I propose that because all massive magnetic effects cancel inside the hole of the torus,
certain conditions would be established to not only flatten the metric inside the hole but in
addition to produce a 5-volume of negative or anti-metrical curvature inside the hole. This
would be a practical form of true anti-gravity."
>
> I therefore propose a theorem of conservation of metrical curvature. In this specific
instance, the region of increased metrical curvature (artificial gravity) must be balanced by a
corresponding region of negative metrical curvature (antigravity) in order to maintain gauge
invariance of the original unperturbed (natural or existing) space-time metric. A full
description of this theorem (which I will send to you soon) involves positive or negative
orthogonal deflection of the space-time 4-metric into "w "or 5-space.
>
> I use the accepted (and preferred) notation where time is considered a zero-th orderdimensional field such that {t = 0; x =1; y = 2; z = 3; w = 4} where w is chosen to be 5-space.
Time is considered a zero-th order field simply because we cannot have instantaneous 1, 2 &
3 dimensional phenomena as they would be, by definition, unobservable.
>
> In addition, in an idealized region of perfectly flat metric in which there is no "observer"
(mass), there would exist a situation in which the Schrodinger field is not predisposed by
observer interaction to "collapse" into wavelike or particle-like states. The Hilbert space of
sections (not functions) relative to the topology of the U(1)2 "electromagnetism-squared"
gauge group (see the Aharonov-Bohm effect, Berry's phase for the photon, and the
renormalization of the Yang-Mills (1954) field by the inclusion (Gerard t'Hooft) of a Higg's
term in the Lagrangian (to give mass to the Goldstone boson to lead to W & Z0. Intermediate
vector bosons) will allow for the controlled expansion of a fluctuation of the charge field,
matter field, or -- most importantly -- the probability field subcomponent of the ZPE."
>
134
> This controlled fluctuation may result in a vast amount of energy becoming available and
may also allow for the useful polarization, accumulation, and concentration of positive and
negative probability states.
>
> Let us discuss briefly what all this means in terms of the practical functioning of the
spaceship. First, consider an inertia-less drive at sub-light velocities (non-ballistic motion).
Imagine the spacecraft moving at a few hundred miles-per-second executing several rapid
right angle turns … and then reversing its course completely all within a couple of seconds.
How do we avoid having to scrape the remains of the crew off the bulkheads with a putty
knife?
>
> Well, any inertial effects would be cancelled by a corresponding reduction in effective rest
mass of the vehicle and occupants because inertial changes would be stored as energy
variations in the special rotating magnetic field around the disc-shaped spaceship's
perimeter. This would cause corresponding variations in the space-time 4-metric outside the
ship. These would be opposed by variations of opposite curvature inside the ship. The two
sets of variations would cancel leaving no net change at any time in the gravity field or in the
inertial conditions within the spacecraft. A slight adjustment would be made to allow a field
of one-G to exist in the vehicle.
>
> The ship is enclosed by a region of positive space-time metric toward which it may move in
any direction as the toroidal field appears spherical in 3-space. It is important to realize that
this spaceship contains the original patented type VI MOSS device plus the new Tesla-type
rotating magnetic field.
>
>The magnetic field generator produces a disc-shaped field (accretion field) and also
incorporates a toroidal scalar field generator and "Berry's phase" pitch angle windings. The
scalar field is needed to keep the throat of the wormhole-like passage open. The vehicle will
be electrically-energized by a nuclear power plant of the Trident type (closed liquid sodium
loop system) or by one of the innovative energy sources now being researched.
We are doing pretty well with getting our interested investor/backers excited about our technology.
Today, I had a nice visit with Mike and gave him some AutoCad drawings and printed material on the
Quantum Dot Corp.
Mike went to work after I left and discovered the entire Scientific American Sept.'01 issue was
dedicated almost entirely to quantum dot technology and, of course, mentioned the Quantum Dot Corp.
in it! The investors called Mike and talked to him about the investment deal. Mike totally got them
fired up over this cutting edge technology with the Quantum Dot Corp. leading the pack! Great timing!
Here is what Mike told me to check out: http://www.physicsweb.org/article/world/14/2/8
Since our lens design is basically one Gigantic crystalline quantum-dot/smart-pixel, it isn't anything
new to these researchers. It's just a new twist of the same old stuff. Same q-dot stuff that's been around
for 20 years or more.
Good luck, Mark! Here's hoping....
Larry Maurer
135
S-086. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL correcting my "mis-conclusions" about e-mail #85
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: regarding Mike's letter to Yoshinari
Date : Sat, 24 Nov 2001 18:55:48 -0800
At 09:15 PM 11/24/01 -0500, you wrote:
> Mr. Maurer ->
> I "understand" his letter better than I did some of your earlier e-mails just because I've seen
the stuff he's writing about in other sites. That's not to say what you had to say earlier is
incorrect, though. Certainly one of the keys to generating anti-grav is producing plasma
effects. And doing a Google search on "rotating magnetic fields" (or other types of fields)
produces evidence of the massive amount of research that has been done here.
.
. Your superlattice lens might be able to produce the "exotic matter" necessary to facilitate
MQT. The fact that Mike's letter reflects what others have been writing about is very exciting
in that it should UNITEL's proposals more "palatable" to investors who are already
acquainted with these concepts.
>
>What I have found is -- similar to what you told me about earlier about "everybody seems to
have a design for a quantum computer nowadays" -- that while others are talking about
utilizing rotating fields, plasma generation and creation of exotic matter, nobody has the
hardware to achieve these things. I believe that UNITEL has the hardware solution and is still
grappling with trying to explain all the physics.
>
> Other theorists (dare I say Sarfatti and risk being dropped off your Xmas-card list?) might
have a grasp on the theory but are no ways close to producing something mechanical. You
may find yourselves intersecting at some point down-the-road where somebody else may have
some answers to explain why the UNITEL device does its thing! And the fact that such a
ligitimate company as Q-Dot (as opposed to TAP-TEN) has taken an interest in you is really
SUPER !!! Will 2001 finally give the ultimate Christmas present to Larry, Mike, and
UNITEL ???
>
>> "I have been working for more than a year on the design of a large disc-shaped
spacecraft that incorporates the UNITEL propulsion system in a new configuration."
>
> Does this mean UNITEL is revising their vision of an interstellar craft that appears in their
web site?
>
>> "This superluminal interstellar drive generates an effectively massive rotating
magnetic field that will produce both a region of increased space-time metrical curvature
surrounding the vehicle and a region of decreased space-time curvature inside the
spaceship. This will be accomplished by generating a special four-dimensional toroidal
field; the "hole" in the torus being the volume occupied by the spaceship."
>
136
> Stan Deyo wrote about using a doughnut-shape toroidal stream to minimize atmospheric
dissipation effects on particle beams. Bob Lazar said that another project at S-4 was
exploring using a back-engineering "gravity lens" in a particle beam weapon (Project
Sidekick).
>
>> "I propose that because all massive magnetic effects cancel inside the hole of the torus,
certain conditions would be established to not only flatten the metric inside the hole but,
in addition, to produce a 5-volume of negative or anti-metrical curvature inside the hole.
This would be a practical form of true anti-gravity. I therefore propose a theorem of
conservation of metrical curvature: In this specific instance, the region of increased
metrical curvature (i.e., artificial gravity) must be balanced by a corresponding region of
negative metrical curvature (i.e., anti-gravity) in order to maintain gauge invariance of the
original, unperturbed (natural or existing) space-time metric. A full description of this
theorem, which I will send to you soon, involves positive or negative orthogonal
deflection of the space-time 4-metric into "w" or 5-space."
>
> This is certainly what is being written about in all the leading physics journals, especially
with the growing interest in the Ekpryotic model that's an alternative to the Inflationary part of
the Big-Bang. It is based on superstrings and M-brane theory and proposes our universe (and
others) were created from collisions between parallel 5-dimensional membranes in the multiverse. This is leading stuff that is being discussed and cannot be labelled "quackery". Now
the possibility of other time-lines, alternate worlds, parallel universes is still up in-the-air.
This model doesn't address those things.
>
> I've even read about Tesla-like arrangements for internal power transfer. (And if you
believe it, some reports have been made of powerful Tesla coil arrangements interfering with
UFO flight.)
>
> Mike's reference to molten sodium was similar to reports of highly-pressurized mercury in a
rotating stream to negate gravity in the rumored TR-3B Black Manta
(http://www.ufomind.com/misc/1998/aug/d26-001.shtml
,
http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m9395.html ). I previously routed you to that site
hypothesizing
plasma
inducing
gravity
=>http://www.stealthskater.com/Science.htm#Plasma . The Ekpryotic stuff is at the
bottom of http://www.stealthskater.com/Science.htm#Ekpyrotic .
>
> A sample Russian study of rotating magnetic fields and gravity (where the investigators
admit they can NOT explain the physics that produced their results) is at
http://alexfrolov.narod.ru/russearl.html . A (possible) related article to rotating magnetic
fields -- but for purposes of time travel rather than gravity negation -- had its roots in the PX/Montauk stuff and appeared at that Argentina time-travel site =>
http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/TIME/RotatingField.doc . (It's interesting the
author suggested other fields than 'magnetic' could be made to rotate.) There was also
mention of Caduceus-Tensor Research done by Wilbert Smith, the 1950's Canadian radio
engineer who told in a private memo about the U.S.'s above-Top-Secret research into UFO's.
Sample circuits appear at
http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/TIME/CaduceusTensor.doc ,
http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/TIME/Caduceus.doc , and
http://www.stealthskater.com/UFO.htm#Smith .
>
137
> I'm still convinced that there is a link between Consciousness and MQT with hurdles
present that need to be overcome to make human-piloted craft feasible. But if the ETs did it,
so can we.
>
> Although I believed in your hardware all along and trusted your theories about what makes
it do these things, Mike's recent email to Yoshinari was more in-line with the cutting-edge
stuff I've been reading about elsewhere. Again -- as far as I can tell (outstide of Lazar's
claims) -- you guys seem to be the only ones with a ready-to-go prototype design. And thus
should have the jump on everyone else everything being "equal", which of course it never is
(life not being fair).
>
> I added UNITEL's stuff to the http://www.stealthskater.com/UNITEL.htm . I re-did the
MS-Word document to appear more like what your site depicts in case (hopefully) people
want to print it off and show it around. I also made the iron-on transfer available for printing.
I also encouraged people to email you directly regarding questions or stock purchases. Also
tell me if you see any communications from me that I've posted in my enthusiasm that
perhaps should not be (e.g., don't mention the "UFO" word to serious investors), let me know
so I can edit them out. Sometimes I don't know when to "shut up" and reveal things I
shouldn't.
>
> Thank you for Mike's letter. It added the finishing touches to a pretty good Thanksgiving!
>
> -- Mark
Dear Mark:
OOOppps! I forgot about the disk design stuff in the letter.
It's okay to have another design. However, we both agreed to stick with our primary design that we
understand more of than the disk design. We really haven't put any energy into the other design and it
wasn't my desire to enlighten you to it. That's not to say that it isn't feasible, mind you. However, the
design is a calculated (or educated guess, if you will) on the popular saucer shape design. Our primary
(capped cone) design isn't a guess. It is from a working model and absolutely no risk (on the overall
design) as we know it works. Period!
I had a brief rap session with our business rep Bryan Willoughby today about our EM mag-lev car
ferry design based on the "Superman" ride at Six Flags amusement park in So. Cal. I asked Bryan to
find me the info on the manufacturers, etc. so we may contact them and propose our car ferry design to
them so we may build a prototype at MIT or elsewhere. The ride has been in existence for a while with
public perfect record. It weighs (I believe) 6 tons and will go from 0-to-110 mph in 7 seconds.
With our design, you would drive on the ferry, lock or secure the car down, and travel at jet airliner
velocity (300 mph) ½-inch off the ground. We would propose setting up a car ferry between Portland
and Seattle (the most heavily used corridor in North America). You could drive off the ferry and have
the luxury of having your own vehicle when you arrive at your destination. Care to see a drawing?
Exciting stuff!! Can't wait to get something built soon!!
Best,
Larry Maurer
138
S-087. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding why electrical charges collect on an aircraft's
wing
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Physics question of the day!!
Date : Sat, 24 Nov 2001 21:43:25 -0800
Mark :
Can you tell me why the charges collect on the right wing of the aircraft on
http://goophy.physics.orst.edu/~ph213/lecture/l2/node1.html?
The dielectric force that will collect the (S) neg charges on our exterior charged vehicle seeking the
projected (N) positive charged field.
Interesting find? It sure is simple enough :-)
Larry Maurer
S-088. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding UNITEL's "capped-cone" hull design
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: a hint at a possible answer
Date : Sun, 25 Nov 2001 11:14:04 -0800
At 09:33 AM 11/25/01 -0500, you wrote:
>> Can you tell me the charges collect on the right wing of the aircraft on:
http://goophy.physics.orst.edu/~ph213/lecture/l2/node1.html ? The dielectric force that
will collect the (S) neg charges on our exterior charged vehicle seeking the projected (N)
positive charged field.
>
> I wonder if this is related to what they put on the B-2 stealth bomber to dissipate a surface
charge that was building up. Some people posted comments that the B-2 had a "secondary
drive system" making use of recent electrogravitic flight breakthroughs. But then I came
across another message that said the antenna-or-probe like appendage that made these other
people think that another drive system was in-place were really used to eliminate some static
charge that was building-up. Or something to that effect. I can't remember where I saw that - perhaps that fighter board.
>
> Your superlattice lens design inspiration came from your close encounter. I take it none of
the objects you saw were of the capped-hull shape you're proposing for UNITEL's craft.
They were cigar-shaped and disc-shaped? Assuming the ETs optimized the shapes their crafts
to make use of this laser plasma system, why are you diverging from that? Just curious. One
of the Montauk legends is they initially configured a chair for the psychics to sit in with a
139
particular arrangement of these Helmholz coils. It only worked partially. When they went
back and used the EXACT plans supposedly given to them by an alien race, the chair worked
perfectly.
>
> Do you have any ideas about the mothership concept? Lazar said that it appeared that the
gravity amplifiers on the discs he examined could be "aimed" in a particular configuration for
interstellar travel. (I assume by that statement he implied there was no need for a
"mothership".) Corso said autoposies of the ETs revealed no digestive systems, and
examination of the disc showed nothing like foodstuffs. He surmised either the crew was
artificially-engineered (like androids) for a long-term spaceflight, or they were able to "warp"
space to travel long distances in so short a time they would have no need for food. Neither
Lazar or Corso mentioned motherships. Yet I've seen this elsewhere. I wonder if there are
more than one alien race that's using a different technology. If you were limited to pure
electrogravitic flight in an atmosphere, you would have to rely on a mothership for interstellar
travel.
>
> -- Mark
Mark:
The "capped-cone" hull design is from exactly what we saw. It wasn't a disk shape. The larger
cigar-shaped craft with the smaller vehicles orbiting it was forming a bound state. This is similar to a
nucleus with electrons orbiting with exciter frequencies to form an atom. A very beautiful way of
performing MQT with the whole mothership with orbiting droids.
For the capped cone shape, see "Fiberbundles" by Bernstein & Phillips, Scientific American, July
1981 issue. The fiber bundle shape can be drafted into the larger cigar shape such as a hard deformed
nucleus of U237- U238. It's a manmade "freak of Nature" that can be as large (BEC) as an aircraft
carrier. "Food-for-thought" fuel?
Roger O & O
Larry Maurer
S-089. from Jack Sarfatti (apparently regarding my support for UNITEL)
From : Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@well.com>
To : sarfatti@well.com
Subject : CIA's Thanks Giving
Date : Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:58:36 -0800
Attachment : C__DOCUME~1_User1_LOCALS~1_Temp_nsmail4A.jpeg (65k)
140
-"What I cannot create. I do not understand." -- Richard Feynman
S-090. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL rebuking Jack Sarfatti
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: I think I've officially joined the "Club" !
Date : Sun, 25 Nov 2001 11:19:37 -0800
At 12:57 PM 11/25/01 -0500, you wrote:
> I received this from Dr. Jack the other day. Upon closer examination I noticed that it
appeared to be sent to me directly and not via an email list. I assume that I have been
inducted into the same club that you were placed into. I do take exception to Feynmann's
quote. Just because you don't understand something does not mean you cannot create it. I
doubt the hillbillies that create moonshine know the physical chemistry behind the
thermodynamics and chemical equilibrium of the liquor they make in their stills. Nor do the
"old wives" know why a particular remedy made from herbs seems to cures rashes or
whatever.
And I told you before how simple mathematical models and lots of
experimentation (to fit the parameters) enabled me and the rest of the class to design heat
exchangers and nuclear reactors without knowing the exact physics that was taking place.
>
> -- Mark
Good for you, Mark!
Hear hear! Aka Tomita & Chiao with creating monopole effects and the BEC creators? None can
physically observe nor completely explain monopoles and BECs. They are merely guessing at in some
instances as to why atoms behave in such a strange manner. This is why one has to build a working
prototype and be prepared for the unexpected. Nothing ever goes perfectly as planned on paper. Ask
Kelly Johnson's crew who developed the SR71 Blackbird.
Jack is a Jackass! How dare the likes of you challenge the DemiGod!! :-)
141
Larry Maurer
S-091. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding "Solid Light"
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Fwd: Solid light
Date : Sun, 25 Nov 2001 18:28:59 -0800
Mark: FYI
> X-Sender: mmiller@casco.net
> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 01:11:20 -0800
> To: lmaurer@unitelnw.com
> From: "Michael E. Miller" <mmiller@casco.net>
> Subject: Solid light
> X-RCPT-TO: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 01:10:38 -0800
> To: pathfinder@mindspring.com
> From: "Michael E. Miller" <mmiller@casco.net>
> Subject: Solid light
>
> Greetings, Blue Eyes; esteemed UNITEL team member:
> Your energies, ideas and proper evolutionary perspective constitute an invaluable contribution to
our mutual philosophies regarding helping humanity with the multiplex applications of UNITEL
technology. I send the same sentiments to Doug Blankenship.
>
> Larry should by now have sent my resume/bio to you as a computer glitch involving software
incompatibility has denied me access to same on my comp. Similarly, I am unable to open any
attachments to my email such as your resume. I have developed the methodology and designed the
as yet unpatented devices essential to the production of a stable photonic phase lattice with zero
momentum and acceleration vectors in 4-space and with density values that -- by the statistics
(properties)of bosonic matter/energy -- may approach infinite density.
>
> This is accomplished by the judicial application of 3 Fermi/Dirac degeneracies to a 3-part
Bose/Einstein condensate held and stabilized/"cooled" in the phase conjugate projected UNITEL
beam. We utilize a specific derivative of the basic beam. The main derivative we employ is the
curl. (Hmmm, I almost made a calculus joke.)
>
> However, one must be aware of the tensor structure of the {U(1)X U(1)} electromagnetic gauge
group and especially of the unique magnetic and dominate nonlocal aspects. I have used an "X" to
represent a tensor product in this Eq. This is, of course, the normal symbol for a vector product.
However, I do not as yet have math notation.
>
> Because photons have no charge, they mediate electromagnetic interactions among defined states
of matter and anti-matter. Indeed, a photon may be dissociated into an electron and a positron. An
142
interesting theoretical method for accomplishing this is to fire a laser beam past a mesoscopic North
or South magnetic monopole.
>
> WE all understand Feynman's QED so the reality of virtual processes is firmly established. We
wish to separate and collect the matter and anti-matter thus created (electrons and positrons in this
case). One may carry anti-matter about in a container of crystallized light which is much easier
than the current method of magnetic confinement. Feynman demonstrated the time reversal
properties of (e+,e-)interactions. This is necessary to stabilize the lattice by canceling the temporal
vectors so no time exists in which the solid light could destabilize. From Einstein, we know that
photons experience not the passage of "time".
>
> My next project is to develop a container for exotic matter. Both matter and anti-matter produce
positive space-time metrical curvature (i.e., gravity). Exotic matter, on the other hand, produces
negative metrical curvature. This is known as anti-gravity. Exotic matter may be carried in a
container of anti-neutral light. Note: some physicists notate gravity as neg. curvature of Gmunu and
anti-G as positive space-time metrical (Gmunu) deflection. One must clearly define all terms as they
are used herein and elsewhere.
>
> Hope this sparks your interest, Brian!!!
>
> Most accurately yours,
> Michael E.Miller,
> Pres. Dir./Research
> UNITEL Inc.
S-092. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding "FiberBundles"
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Fwd: Re: a new experiment to confirm superstrings
Date : Sun, 25 Nov 2001 18:41:53 -0800
Mark :
In your latest correspondence, you mentioned something about "fiberbundles" not mentioned being
connected to our spaceship design. Please remember that "fiberbundles" are math/geometry topological
concepts. Please refer to the material I sent you previously. I shall be in touch.
BTW, our smaller ship will be able to traverse space using MQT without a mothership. It's just
convenient for the whole group of ships to tunnel together in a bound state.
Regards,
Larry Maurer
S-093. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding partnership with companies intending to mine
the Moon
143
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: CNN.com - Miners eye moon for the mother lode - November 23, 2001
Date : Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:21:57 -0800
Attachment : 45d0f4.jpg (1k), 45d121.jpg (1k), 45d124.jpg (1k), 45d128.jpg (1k), 45d12b.jpg (1k),
45d12e.jpg (1k), 45d131.jpg (1k), 45d134.jpg (1k), 45d137.jpg (1k), 45d13b.jpg (9k), 45d142.jpg (9k),
45d149.jpg (10k), 45d151.jpg (69k), 45d174.jpg (1k)
At 09:39 AM 11/26/01 -0800, you wrote:
> 45d0f4.jpg 45d121.jpg
> <http://www.cnn.com>45d124.jpg 45d128.jpg
> Powered by <http://www.clickability.com>45d12b.jpg
>
> 45d12e.jpg
>
> Could you team up with one of these mining companies to supply a lower-cost launch
vehicle for moon missions ?
>
> 45d131.jpg
>
> Click the following to access the sent link:
>
> 45d134.jpg
><
http://cnn.space.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&etMailToI
D=880555949 > CNN.com
> - Miners eye moon for the mother lode - November 23, 2001
> 45d137.jpgCNN.com will expire this article on 12/07/2001.
Mark :
This is our definite intention to bring the prospect of a quick return on an investment to mine
celestial bodies such as Mars, the Moon, or asteroids that harbor $trillions in precious metals. Just as
Palmer created the narrow gauge railroad tracks into the impossible area of Silverton, Colorado in the
1880s, we will be able to provide the cheapest and easiest method of transportation to mine these near
impossible areas. In fact, our earlier of transportation to mine these near impossible areas.
Our earlier mentor and witness to our technology -- Arnold Limberg, formerly Chief Engineer,
Apollo 11 Moon Shot, Hughes Aircraft Co.,- -- proposed putting magnetic straps on our vehicle to haul
precious ore from asteroids to pay quickly for our vehicle.
There is another organization on the East coast that we would like to contact. You really hit a nerve
here, Mark!!
Regards,
Larry Maurer
S-094. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Scientific American article on "fiberbundles"
144
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: T.A.P.-T.E.N.'s site is back up
Date : Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:37:16 -0800
At 09:32 AM 11/26/01 -0500, you wrote:
> Thanks for acquainting me with the real definition of that term "fiberbundle". I had never
heard of that before and thought it was something like a "bundle" of "fiber optic" cables.
>
> It looks like that T.A.P.-T.E.N. site is back up at => http://www.tap-ten.com/ . An article - "More Notes on the ZPE, Casimir, & Hutchison Effects" -- authored by someone there was
posted
was
posted
at
that
Argentina
site
=>
http://www.network54.com/Hide/Forum/thread?forumid=136566&messageid=10063770
11 . (I'm sure you could go to any Free Energy site (like Bearden's and find lots of essays on
this stuff.)
>
> -- Mark
Mark :
Please try to get hold of a copy of Bernstein&Phillips's article in Scientific American, '81. It will
explain in detail what we are discussing here with fiber bundle theory.
Larry
S-095. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a post at a Yahoo! Quantum Time Travel
club
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: people are starting to become aware of UNITEL
Date : Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:41:58 -0800
At 11:07 AM 11/26/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Good morning, Mr. Maurer ->
>Maybe some of my posting in UFO/physics clubs won't be wasted. I see some follow-up
posts to the general reader community regarding questions on UNITEL. I'll close with an
example I just came across while posting some "Time-Space Displacement" stuff as a trick to
get them to the page with the new UNITEL stuff on it.
>
>As I see it, you're caught in a PR dilemma. If you fess up about the inspirations on your
patent coming from a close encounter, you scare off the people with money. On-the-otherhand, the general public doesn't trust the government and is convinced they are concealing
evidence and suppressing new technology. How do you get your story to the masses without
driving off the people with the resources to make it come true?
145
>
I don't think you could construct such a document that would be walking a fine line between
the 2 sides and post it at your web-site. Maybe if you emphasize the "DoD has always
favored certain contractors" and "we recognize that our best efforts to explain the physics
behind why our invention works may be lacking" angles ... that would work okay in a public
document. Otherwise you'll have to respond on an individual basis unless you want to go out
on a limb and post a UFO-type paper (like what you've sent me) at one of the clubs.
>
>The following comment was at Yahoo!'s "Quantum Time Travel" club =>
http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/quantumtimetravel from a member living in Spokane. He
was alerted to UNITEL by a previous message I had posted. You might not need to be a
member just to look at the Message Board. Try it and see. You probably have to be a
member of Yahoo!, though.
>
> -- Mark
>
>> "I just recently got reference from another person in a different club to this company
but on a different subject. UNITEL claims to have in the works an integrated aerospace
ship capable of interplanetary and interstellar travel via magnetic propulsion and
macroscopic magnetic tunneling. I have been dissecting them for the last 2 hours (of
this posting) trying to confirm their legitimacy. From what I can tell, everything they
claim is true and if this company goes public, Boeing, Lockheed, Intel, IBM and any
other industry in the aerospace or computing industry will have to pull every trick they
are working on out in the open just to stay in business. UNITEL claims to have a fully
functional holographic quantum computer that is compatible with current peripherals.
They claim to be working on a medical system to eradicate harmful pathogens with
harmonic resonance (which does work providing you know the exact frequency that
kills the organism), and again claims to be working on a fully integrated aerospace
vehicle with interstellar capability. I should note that the way they describe the vehicle,
it will be directed at the American public in a similar manner to private airplanes. I
thought I would share that with everyone here. I also ask that if anyone in this club has
expertise in quantum mechanics or any field of physics to check into this company and
see if they are legitimate in their claims. I am not an expert so I can only corroborate
what I see on the surface and what I can cross-reference."
Mark :
You are exactly right. However, there is nothing stranger than the truth. That's the way it goes. We
do lean toward the facts of what we are proposing to build first and foremost. The UFO stuff is a
sideline thing as we see it.
Best,
Larry Maurer
S-096. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding UNITEL's newsletter
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
146
Subject : Fwd: Re: site about marketing
Date : Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:53:30 -0800
Mark :
FYI- Could I get a professional opinion from you too? I think you have a great insight into our
endeavors and you are also an excellent writer too!
Larry
> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:51:26 -0800
> To: pkirsh@ucla.edu
> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
> Subject: Re: site about marketing
>
> Hello Paul:
>
> How are things going? We are still negotiating with investors down in Long Beach. We signed
and notarized a finder's fee agreement with our reps and faxed it off today. One step closer to
getting our much needed funding. I have attached the UNITEL newsletter for you to take a look
at. In it I mentioned your name with congrats along with others that have helped us in the last
year. Perhaps when you get some time, you could look at it and give it your professional touch as
we have over 500 recipients of our newsletter and we want to look our best. I wish we had more
positive news, such as an official response from the Quantum Dot Corp., Investor/backers, etc; but
we are progressing and our viewers need to have something to look at.
>
> One of the main areas we want to stress is that we are willing to sell off small lots (minimum
$500) of our $16.80 shares to stay alive with paying our bills etc. (at least until we receive full
funding). You know how it goes! This recession is affecting us but we are selling small bits and
pieces of stock. It helps, brother!
>
> We are sitting on a veritable gold mine of information concerning potential technical films such
as the MQT ideas that are now a cool buzzword amongst international aerospace community
participants. I remember when we first mentioned MQT back in the 80's and we got nothing but
weird looks from everyone. Now we aren't getting our koodos for being the pioneers in MQT. A
film, though, with all the MQT supporters would make a great film for the Sci Fi channel or PBS.
>
> Still working on our book and that maybe the way to spark attention and revenue, etc. let me
know what you think, Paul! I am getting around to the Med aspect of things as soon as we can
make headway with our negotiations. Talk to you soon!
>
> Larry
>
> At 03:22 PM 11/16/01 -0800, you wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Good luck again about tomorrow! I found this site about venture capital and marketing.
>>
http://www.universityangels.com/frameset.jsp?url=www.tannedfeet.com
>>
>> Best, Paul
147
November 26, 2001
NEWSLETTER
UNITEL is moving with great vigor into the future. Now in our 20th year of incorporation, our
technology applications have reached an unparalleled level of interest from large manufacturers. Due to
the unfortunate attack on America on Sept. 11th, our plans have been drastically altered and we are now
slowly recovering from the effect of this dastardly attack that sent the airline industry in a $4.7 billion
deficit which in turn affected the world economy to create the current conditions that we all are
conscious of unless you have been living on the moon for the last two months.
In September, Rolls Royce had approved appropriation of funds for construction of a one square
centimeter of our niobium-titanium-diamond smart skin material, for testing purposes. They want to test
probes in static and modulated mode before putting it in a rig test which would cost millions They have
great interest in using this technology inside of their jet engines to reduce the turbulence, pollution,
engine noise, and, for military purposes, reduce the radar and infrared signature of military aircraft.
Rolls Royce researchers want to modulate the small smart skin piece on a greater planar mode to show
the acoustic surface waves for instability control in our application.
UNITEL's smartskin design is based on the years of research performed at the now defunct Avco,
Everett, NJ. The niobium alloy and high strength magnetic fields of high energy conversion from the
stored magnetic fields to electricity in the form of modulated close adhering cloud of electrons produces
a weight factor of 20 over conventional shielding of reentry aerospace vehicles. This factor clearly
indicates the weight reduction and increase of efficiency of the jet engine design incorporating our smart
skin design.
Applied Sciences, Inc., Cedarville, OH will perform on a best effort basis the production of the free
standing 1 square cm smart skin piece of 10 micrometers thick. The maximum possible purity will be
sought. The set-up and production time will require about 3-4 weeks and a minimum of five production
runs will be performed
Is there a more rewarding thrill than to break a record? Whereas most of us must content ourselves
with breaking personal bests, earlier this month the scientists and engineers of Berkeley Lab's
Superconducting Magnet Group experienced the rush of shattering a world record. (see
http://enews.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/14-tesla-magnet.html) The team's newest niobium-tin
dipole electromagnet reached an unprecedented field-strength of 14.7 Tesla. This is more than 300,000
times the strength of Earth's magnetic field.
In a series of correspondences from "B.G." of Rolls Royce Deutschland, "B.G." explains:
“Our two plasma projects (one with the smart skin) successfully passed the second review of the RR
selection team. We received the priority 7 whereby 8 is the highest. Projects are only funded receiving
priority higher than 6. So I look forward to hearing the results with end of September…. There is much
interest from our site. But on Friday we received following bad news because of the present crisis in the
148
aerospace companies. You may know that most companies started layoff employees and reduce R&T
budget etc. So our two projects lost priority for this year. We did not pass at the last selection meeting.
We had priority 7 and were reduced to 6, which under normal circumstances would be funded. Please do
not give up. I am sure we will again find opinions to cooperate. There is a small chance to request
money from the emerging technology budget. I will try. In the next week we might discuss whether we
are able to pay from RRD money. But it looks bad because of cuts. At next opportunity I will again try
to find funding for our common project.”
We want to give thanks to Paul Kirsch for his continuing support with his efforts to write articles and
editing for us. Also we want to thank Jim Reinmuth and Wil Zarecor for his hard work in assisting us
with rewriting our business plans , spreadsheets, etc.
Hewlett-Packard continues to move forward with corporate negotiations concerning their interest in
our Quantum Storage Device design. Currently, at a time of record losses, their directors have had the
wisdom to be the first to take interest in UNITEL's revolutionary quantum technologies. As testimony
to this intent they have allocated five hundred million dollars to finding the next big “industrial
innovation". Fortunately for them, UNITEL stands ready to open a whole new age of computer
technology, using crystal lattices instead of memory cards, and light instead of electricity.
In light of these powerful possibilities we saw the value of our stock increase on (August 10th) from
one share at 2/10 of 1% of $1 million shares to $16.80 a share of 1 million shares issued. We anticipate
further dramatic increase in our value as these relationships solidify over the next few months. This will
make acquiring UNITEL's stock more affordable to potential supporters of UNITEL's cause.
We are continuing to approach our Initial Public Offering, depending on the outcome of our ongoing
negotiations with major investment firms interested in providing full funding for both first and second
rounds.
UNITEL's industrial application will be in the form of a device, we unofficially affectionately
dubbed the "StumpBlaster". This powerful laser device will be a simplified version of the same
technology that we intend to apply to computing, medical, and propulsion. However in this simplified
design, we will trade finesse for raw power, and produce an extremely energetic beam capable of
vaporizing tree stumps or drilling through solid rock. There is a considerable amount of revenue to be
reaped from profits from developing these useful industrial applications that will allow a much faster, far
less expensive way than conventional methods. The better mouse trap rules again as it were!
The device, although intended as a mere demonstration of our technology, will be a remarkable tool
in its own right, and insure near-term profitability as we develop truly unique technologies. This
application will be useful for industrial drilling and mining purposes and should draw much attention
from the public, which can in turn stimulate interest in our other applications such as our quantum
computer and space propulsion system.
The continued support we have received over the years has been indispensable; it has allowed us to
reach this final mile marker. A final push, however, is needed to seize the opportunities that lay waiting,
and compound the value of the funds that have been wisely invested. With continued support from
investors, within this year, we will be on the open market with verifiable technology capable of being
demonstrated to the public.
Cordially,
UNITEL Corporate Staff
149
S-097. From Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding my message posted at a Yahoo! "Quantum
Time Travel" club
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: people are starting to become aware of UNITEL
Date : Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:23:20 -0800
> {posted on "Quantum Time Travel" by stealthskaters at 11/26/01 11:21 am}
>
> I have been in increasingly close contact with Mr. Larry Maurer, the Director of
Engineering and co-holder of UNITEL's patented superlattice laser crystal lens. UNITEL's
progress in constructing a prototype has been slowed largely due to 2 reasons. The
government has always favored certain defense contractors and "think tanks". Also there are
some holes in the underlying physics of laser plasma generation and its effects that are just
now being addressed by modern advances in superstring and M-brane theories.
>
> It is difficult (and rightly so) to sell a proposal to investors without a sound scientific
review. In this case, here, at least from one I can see, something wonderful has happened
leading to a proverbial gold mine of technology. Instead of theory preceding experimental
verification and the building of machines, UNITEL has had the good fortune to
"acquire"/"stumble on" something remarkable that promises to produce room-temperature
Bose-Einstein condensates and quantum effects in the REAL macroscopic world! As you can
see from their web-site ( http://www.unitelnw.com ), being able to do generate these has so
MANY different applications.
>
> A major England-based aircraft corporation was on the verge of granting them funding for
their HOLO-1 prototype and then the 9-11 disaster hit and the aircraft industry tumbled
economically. UNITEL has had other "irons in the fire" but has always been mystified why
the U.S. government seems to be very interested in their progress but unwilling to grant them
relatively small funding. I could discuss much more but I'll wait until Mr. Maurer wants to
post anything here. He and his Director of Research are just starting to publish a book about
the UNITEL experience in an effort to get their message to the U.S. public as well as the
world. (who knows? maybe there is a covert conspiracy a la X-files going on after all???)
Mark:
Great post on Yahoo! We could not have said it better! Way to go!! I will keep sending you as
much possible info as I can. I am getting Mike to update our design with his latest physics applications.
I want him to focus on explaining fiber bundle theory and the Mobius "knot" that he keeps explaining
the ship as. I shall be in touch, my friend!
Larry Maurer
S-098. From "Nanna Visitor" regarding an invitation to join a "Theoretical Sciences" on-line
club
150
From : Nanna Visitor <visitornannar@yahoo.com> TheoreticalScience@communities.msn.co.uk
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: UNITEL is the only viable one I can see ...
Date : Tue, 27 Nov 2001 08:29:56 -0800 (PST)
stealthskater@hotmail.com wrote:
> I have investigated many diverse subjects in the "unexplained" categories. But from what
I've been privileged to accumulate over 15 years, the "only game in town" -- from a working
engineering prototype viewpoint -- is what UNITEL (see http://www.stealthskater/index.htm
) is doing. They have been hindered on a couple of fronts. They have something that "works"
but are still trying to nail down a physics explanation of 'why' it works. This needs to be done
before large-scale investment is awarded. And then the government has always favored
certain DoD contractors (kickbacks,payoffs notwithstanding). Patent-stealing is nothing new.
> Current advances in superstring/M-brane theories and achievement of Bose-Einstein
condensates by others are helping them build a sound argument to satisfy the skeptics. Their
unique and patented superlattice laser crystal lens promises to generate room-temperature BE-C's and achieve quantum tunneling in the MACROscopic world leading to MAJOR
advances in computers, medicine, weapon systems, and potentially interstellar transport.
Yes, I've visited your "stealthskater/index.html" and found it interesting. Yes, we are aware of
UNITEL's work and the "theoretical" problems faced. So I will invite you again to join us at the new
topic on TS and say this.
Why re-invent the wheel, if living tissue commits quantum tunneling in the macro-world nearly
every half nanosecond a day? Why not understand first how bioenergetic multiplexing occurs and then
work from that?
Keep in touch. It is getting exciting.
NANNA
S-099. From Bob King regarding a correction to the Pine Gap, Australia mystery
From : bob king <bobking@xtra.co.nz>
To : stealthskater@hotmail.com
Subject : your site
Date : Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:19:13 +1300
Hi ya, Mark,
I have just visited you site and from what I can see of it, you have done a lot of work and produced
basically a concentrated site for info on some related subjects -- good job.
I noticed in one place you mention about a lot of the alien stuff being moved to Australia to a place
called Pine Gap. I think you need to be clarified on this issue.
Pine Gap is just outside of Alice Springs and is an official USA site (as are a couple of others). But
the alien subjects/objects were not taken there as a final destination. Pine Gap is the site they admit to
151
and -- although not exactly open -- public access can be obtained. Any access to this site will not teach
anyone anything as the actual site (which IS Top-Secret) is situated some distance away with no road
access. Everything is flown openly into Pine Gap and then the highly secret stuff is taken by mostly
helicopter to the actual site. The real site has a full scale airfield which can be seen from photos taken
from orbiting cameras and is situated just north of a nature reserve and south of Lake Barlee in
southwestern Australia (long-29.7 south; lat-119.8) .
I thought you just might like this info. as it's not generally known.
-Regards,
bob
mailto:bobking@xtra.co.nz
<= previous E-mails 001-049
next E-mails 100-149 =>
if on the Internet, press <BACK> on your browser to return to
the previous page (or go to www.stealthskater.com)
else if accessing these files from the CD in a MS-Word session, simply <CLOSE> this
file's window-session; the previous window-session should still remain 'active'
152