1 MIDLANDS STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY HCT 204: CHEMICAL INSTRUMENTATION 1 Compiled by Mambanda Isaac (Chief Technician) & Gonzo Muriel(Snr Lab Technician) 2 EXPERIMENT 1: Determination of the distribution of trace heavy metals in urban roadway dust in Gweru. INTRODUCTION Dust is useful as an indicator for pollution. Various parameters can be measured in dust samples chief among which are the heavy metals like Pb, As, Cu, Zn, Ni, Fe, Mn, Al to name a few.When introduced into the human body by inhalation, ingestion or through diffusion via the skin(in the form of salts like ZnCrO4 ) these metals cause various maladies ranging from skin lesions through gastro tract problems to severe brain damage. People working in dusty environments are exposed to high levels of various toxic metals. The dust that enters the body through inhalation is mostly that which is airborne. In protected areas like open verandas and shades at garages, flea markets and bridges , this air borne dust gradually settles down at a rate dependent on their densities. For dust particles of similar composition, the density should vary directly with particle size. Small particles are air –borne for longer periods than larger ones and end up being inhaled into the human body. The ease with which dust samples can be taken enhances its use as a pollution index. It is found almost everywhere and can be sampled using very simple equipment. Dusts along roadways are due to a number of sources. Because of the presence of metals in the earth’s crust, the existence of these metals in roadway dust is to be expected. Automobiles contribute direct exhaust emission and tyre wear particles which probably come from body rusting and ablation from the interior of the exhaust system. It is apparent that streets with high traffic densities should also have high metal levels. The construction and demolition of structures or buildings that has been painted with heavy metal – based paints contributes a wide range of metal s into the vicinity of roadways. Some industrial activities like welding, spray painting, metal casting emit toxic metals into the environment. LITERATURE REVIEW A literature review is a general survey of the work that has been carried out elsewhere and published in journals by other workers on levels of trace heavy metals in roadway dust. You are supposed to carry out a literature review and report your findings in less than two pages. Remember it is very important to take note of references in your literature review. REAGENTS AND CHEM ICALS REQUIRED Analytical grade (AR) reagents are to be used throughout. Compiled by Mambanda Isaac (Chief Technician) & Gonzo Muriel(Snr Lab Technician) 3 Nitric Acid SG 1.40 Perchloric Acid 72% (w/w) Hydrochloric Acid SG 1.34 Standard solutions for various metals (1000ppm, spectrosol) PROCEDURES Sampling Identify a sampling site of your choice and prepare an appropriate sampling plan. Carry out your sampling according to your sampling plan by scooping the dust with clean spatulas into well labeled polythene bags and tie with strings. Samples should be collected at 2m intervals starting from the edge of the road going away from the road.The total number of samples to be collected should be enough to allow one to draw a good graph of the metal distribution. Standard Solution Preparation Using 1000ppm commercial stock solutions transfer 10ml into a 100ml volumetric flask and dilute to the mark with distilled water. This gives a 100ppm working standard for each metal. Prepare from the working standard appropriate calibration standards by serial dilution measuring 1ppm; 2ppm; 4ppm; 6ppm; and 8ppm. Prepare composite standards. As and Hg standards should be prepared according to the requirements of the methods used to analyse these metals i.e. hydride vapour generation and mercury vapour generation. Sample Treatment Air-dry the dust samples at room temperature, i.e 24-30oC. Weigh the dry sample on an analytical balance and sieve the samples through a series of stainless steel of diameter 600,400,200,100 and 50 microns. Weigh each fraction and put it in a well labeled bag. To 0.4000g portions of the prepared dust in 250ml beakers add distilled water to form a sherry. Compiled by Mambanda Isaac (Chief Technician) & Gonzo Muriel(Snr Lab Technician) 4 Add HNO3 (5ml) and HCLO4 (0.5ML) Heats the mixture on a hot plate until a residue remains. Add 2M HCL (2.5) to the residue and transfer quantitatively the contents to a 100ml volumetric flask bringing to the mark using distilled water. Analyse the samples by Flame AA or Graphite furnace AA depending on the level of each element in the samples. Use the following instrumental condition in your analysis by FAA. METAL WAVELENGTH(nm) BAND PASS(nm) LAMP CURRENT(mA) FLAME TYPE Cd 228.8 0.5 4 Oxidising Cr 357.9 0.2 5 Reducing Cu 324.7 0.5 4 Oxidising Fe 248.3 0.2 5 Oxidising Mn 279.5 0.2 5 Oxidising Ni 232.0 0.2 4 Oxidising Pb 217.0 1.0 5 Oxidising Zn 213.9 1.0 5 Oxidising Express each fraction as a percentage of the bulk sample and the metal levels as mg metal/kg dry sample. Draw graphs showing the relationship between; i. Weight of fraction and particle size ii. Metal levels and particle size iii. Metal level and distance from the road Discuss and conclude your results. References Compiled by Mambanda Isaac (Chief Technician) & Gonzo Muriel(Snr Lab Technician) 5 References are expected to come from your literature review. Compiled by Mambanda Isaac (Chief Technician) & Gonzo Muriel(Snr Lab Technician) 6 EXPERIMENT 2: Ultraviolet spectrophotometric determination of Aspirin, Phenacetin and caffeine and Anadin tablets using solvent extraction. PRINCIPLE Caffenol and Anadin tablets are a mixture of aspirin, phenacetin and caffeine. Each of these substances has characteristic absorption in the ultraviolet region, with the principle maximum lying at 227 for aspirin, 275nm for caffeine and 250nm for phenacetin.In the procedure, a powdered tablet is dissolved in methylene chloride and the aspirin is separated from the phenacetin and caffeine by extracting it into aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution. The separated aspirin is back –extracted into methylene chloride by acidifying the aqueous layer and is then measured spectophotometically at 277nm. The phenacetin and caffeine that remain in the original methylene chloride layer are determined in a mixture as described in analytical texts in Chapters on UV/VIS spectrometry according to Beer’s law. According to Beer’s law, when two absorbing species in solution have overlapping peaks, the total absorbance. A is the sum of two absorbances. For two absorbing species, A=axbcx + aybcy OR A= Exbcx + Eybcy Where A is the total absorbance observed ax and ay are the absorptivities of X and Y, Ex and Ey are the molar absorptivities of X and Y in grams per litre of the solution and b is the path length. For two unknowns, two measurements have to be made and absorbencies at each peak will be, A1=Ax1 +Ay1 =Ex1bcx + Ey1bcy And Ax2 + Ay2 = Ex2bcx + Ey2bcy Concentration of x and y can be obtained by solving these equations. Equations A HCO-3 A CH2CI2 A (277nm) P CH2CH2 P (250nm) + C (275nm) c Reagents and Chemicals Provided CH2CI2, 4% (wt /vol) NaHCO3 solution (chilled), concentrated. HCl, 1M H2SO4. To prepare Compiled by Mambanda Isaac (Chief Technician) & Gonzo Muriel(Snr Lab Technician) 7 Standard solutions. Prepare individual standard solutions of about 100mg/L, 20mg/L and 10mg/L each of aspirin, phenacetin and caffeine in methylene chloride as follows: Weigh about 25mg (to the nearest 0.1mg) of each, transfer to 250ml volumetric flasks, and dissolve to volume with methylene chloride. Dilute 10 and 5ml of this solution to 50ml in 50ml volumetric flasks to prepare the 20 and 10mg/h solutions, respectively. PROCEDURE Weigh accurately and record the weight of one tablet. This should be equivalent to about 220mg aspirin, 160mg phenacetin, and 30mg caffeine. To minimize required dilutions and save on solvents, cut the tablet into quarters and weigh out one –quarter portion to be analysed. Crush to a fine powder in a beaker. Add, with stirring, 20ml methylenechloride; then transfer the mixture quantitatively to a 60ml separatory funnel, rinsing all particles in with a little more methylene chloride. Extract the Aspirin from the methylene chloride solution with two 10ml portions of chilled 4% sodium bicarbonate to which has been added two drops hydrochloric acid, and then with one 5ml portion water. Wash the combined aqueous extracts with three 10ml portions of methylene chloride (to remove traces of water) into a 50ml volumetric flask and dilute to the mark with methylene chloride. Then dilute further a 1ml aliquot of this solution to 50ml with methylene chloride in a volumetric. Acidify the bicarbonate solution (aqueous extract), still in the separatory funnel, with 6ml of1MH2SO4.This step should be performed without delay, to avoid hydrolysis of aspirin. The acid must be added slowly in small portions. Mix well only after the most of carbon dioxide evolution has ceased. The pH at this point should be 1 to 2 (pH test paper). Extract the acidified solution with eight separate 10ml portions of methylene chloride and filter through an ethylene chloride wet paper into a 100ml volumetric flask. Dilute to volume. Then, Dilute further a 5ml portion of this solution to 25ml with methylene chloride in a volumetric flask. Record absorbance versus wavelength curves for the standard solutions and unknown solutions between 200 and 300nm. (This step may be deleted if you do not have a recording ultraviolet spectrophotometer). Does the wavelength of 277nm appear to be the most suitable wavelength for the determination of aspirin? Do the wavelengths of 250 and 275nm appear to be the best wavelengths for the measurement of the absorbance for the mixture of phenacetin and caffeine? Explain. Using the absorbencies of the standard and the unknown aspirin solution at 277nm) calculate the percent aspirin in the caffeine and /or Anadin tablets and the number of milligrams of aspirin per tablet keeping in mind the dilutions. To calculate the concentrations of phenacetin and caffeine, the absorbencies of phenacetin and caffeine standards and of the methylene chloride extract of the sample must all be read at both 250 and 275nm. /using these absorbencies, calculate the percentage phenacetin and caffeine in the APC tablets and the Compiled by Mambanda Isaac (Chief Technician) & Gonzo Muriel(Snr Lab Technician) 8 milligrams of each per tablet. See Chapter 13 for the spectrophotometric determination of mixtures. (G.D Christian, Analytical Chemistry) Note: Aspirin tends to decompose in solution, and analysis should be performed as soon possible after preparing solutions. Compiled by Mambanda Isaac (Chief Technician) & Gonzo Muriel(Snr Lab Technician) 9 EXPERIMENT 3: Qualitative Gas Chromatographic analysis of a multicomponent mixture of pesticides. Introduction and Overview Gas Liquid chromatography (GLC) is a type of chromatography in which the mobile phase is a gas, such as nitrogen, helium, etc, and the stationary phase in an inert liquid. The sample is usually in liquid form, but is flash vapourised as it is injected into the instrument and is maintained in the gaseous state through the instrument. The major components of a gas chromatograph are shown in block diagram below: Carrier Gas Flow Controller Injection Part (heated) Column Oven Detector (heated) Electrometer Recorder Carrier Gas or Mobile Phase The carrier gas chosen depends; on the detector to be employed; nitrogen or argon is used with the most popular detector, the flame ionization detector (FID). The carrier gas is supplied at a reduced pressure from a large gas cylinder equipped with a pressure regulator. Often the carrier gas is filtered through tubes containing a drying agent, a molecular sieve and oxygen scrubber to remove moisture, impurities and oxygen from the prior to its entering the column. The flow of controller is needle valve or other device used to control the gas flow rate. In some instruments a rotometer is used to measure the the actual flow rate. A flow rate of 75cm3 per min, is most often used for 6,4mm o.d. columns, while a flow rate of 25cm2 per min is used for 3,2 o.d. Columns. The injection Part The sample is introduced into the GC through the injection Part, a small hearted chamber capped with a septum. The sample is introduced by means of a small calibrated syringe. The septum is pierced by the Syringe needle and reseals when the syringe needle is withdrawn /typical volumes injected into packed columns are 1-3ul. The injection part temperature part temperature should be high enough (e.g. 2200C) to vapourise the sample instantly (i.e. flash vapourisation). Sample vapourisaton should be rapid so that the vaporized sample is swept by the carrier gas into the column as a discrete’’plug’’ Compiled by Mambanda Isaac (Chief Technician) & Gonzo Muriel(Snr Lab Technician) 10 The column The column where the actual chromatographic separation occurs is enclosed in an oven that maintains the desired temperature. A conventional ‘’packed’’ column is filled with a granular solid support coated with a thin layer of liquid stationary phase. Separation occurs by differences in the distribution of the various sample components between the carrier gas and the liquid stationary phase. (s/p). The s/p is normal coated evenly on the surface of the solid support with a solution of the liquid phase and then evaporating off the solvent. The solid support must have a uniform pore diameter and a large surface area. These properties are needed to support an adequate coating of stationary liquid phase and provide good contact with the mobile phase. The particles should be of regular shape with good mechanical strength to permit an efficient, well-packed column. The solid support can be made from silica and other materials. Columns can be metal or glass. Glass is preferred because it is inert towards most organic compounds. After packing a column is conditioned before its use by passing carrier gas through it at elevated temperatures to remove volatile impurities. The Detector The function of the detector is to sense when a compound is leaving the column and to provide a signal that is proportional to the concentration of the compound of the compound in the carrier gas stream. Several types of detectors are available. The FID is the most common and responds to all organic compounds. The detector is heated to the temperature needed to keep the sample compounds from condensing. The Electrometer The output from the detector is a very small electric current. This is fed into an electrometer which amplifies and converts the detector output to a voltage that is large enough to be recorded. The Recorder The recorder records the voltage from the electrometer as a function of time to give a chromatogram showing the separated sample components as peaks in the chromatogram. Theory of Gas liquid chromatography Chromatographic Efficiency The width of chromatographic peaks is a measure of the efficiency of chromatographic system. The system includes the entire instruments and not just the column. The ability to obtain sharp, narrow peaks is often expressed in terms of a plate number. A large value for a plate number indicates high chromatographic efficiency and excellent separation ability. Compiled by Mambanda Isaac (Chief Technician) & Gonzo Muriel(Snr Lab Technician) 11 The plate number, N, is related to the length of the chromatographic column, L, by the equation, H = L/N Where H is the plate height. Effect of flow rate on chromatographic efficiency: The Van Deemter equation is the classical statement of the effect of flow rate on chromatographic efficiency. The simplified form of this equation is H = A + B/u + Cu Where u is the average linear gas flow rate in cm/sec, and A, B and C are constants. A plot of H versus u shows that H has a minimum value at a certain value of u. This is the optimum value of u for chromatographic separation. H ---------------- u opt Temperature and temperature programming Temperature is a major factor in adjusting conditions for a satisfactory separation. When sample components elute rapidly and are incompletely resolved, lowering the column temperature will slow the elution and probably improve the peak resolution. If a mixture containing both high and low a component is to be separated, the temperature needed to separate the boiling compounds may slow the separation of the high –boiling components too much. Late eluting peaks will be broader and resolution often poor. In such cases temperature programming can be used. In this technique, the column temperature is increased linearly with time at a preset rate. The more volatile sample components are separated at the lower temperatures while the higher- boiling compounds gradually move at a faster rate through the column so that their peaks appear earlier on the chromatogram. Compiled by Mambanda Isaac (Chief Technician) & Gonzo Muriel(Snr Lab Technician) 12 Principle of method An acetone extract of the specimen is partitioned between hexane and saturated brine. The hexane, containing the non polar pesticides (organophosphorus, organochlorine and carbaryl), plus fat, is cleaned up on a wood’s column and then examined by the GLC,TLC Brine solution containing the polar pesticides is extracted by ethyl acetate and extract examined by GLC,TLC, e.t.c. If only one type (polar or non-polar) is being sought the full procedure need not be followed, the appropriate parts are selected. Procedure Put 10g of soil sample and 10g anhydrous sodium sulphate and 50ml acetone in a250ml beaker and homogenize by stirring. Filter the contents through a fluted filter paper and place on water bath with fan to evaporate to approximately 5- 10ml. Transfer the residue to a 250ml separating funnel containing 100ml of saturated sodium chloride solution and rinse the beaker with 2 x 5 ml hexane and 1 x 5 ml acetone adding the rinsing to the separating funnel. Shake vigorously for 2 minutes, allow the layers to separate and run the aqueous layer into the original beaker. Transfer the hexane to a 250ml separatory funnel. Re-extract the aqueous layer twice or more, each with 10ml hexane. Wash the combined hexane with 2 x 10 ml brine solution by gentle shaking, and add the washings to the main brine solution, which is then reserved for the extraction of the polar pesticides. If necessary, dry the combined hexane with a little solid anhydrous sodium sulphate and then decant onto 1.5g celite in a 50ml beaker, washing the sodium sulphate with a little hexane. Evaporate the hexane at low temperature, with occasional stirring until a homogenous hexane-free friable powder is obtained and transfer to a small wood’s column for clean up, Fill in the large wood’s columns with Florasil and saturate with hexane. Elute from the small columns into the large columns using dimethyl sulphaxide (DMSO) (6ml).Elute from the large columns with 50ml hexane containing 15% of ether. Concentrate the eluate to 10ml and reserve for GLC analysis. Extract the combined brine solution with 3 x 50 ml ethyl acetate (vigorous shaking for 5 minutes) drying each extract successively with the small quantity of anhydrous sodium sulphate and evaporating successively in a 150ml beaker, finally to almost dryness. Dissolve in acetone and make up to 10ml, and reserve for GLC.This solution contains the polar organophosphorus pesticides. GLC ANALYSIS It is advisable to inject first on FID, then NPD and possibly after appropriate dilution, on ECD. Confirmation of identity can sometimes be partly accomplished by injection on more than one column, but if possible, TLC confirmation should be done. FID – Flame Ionisaton Detector, non selective, detects both polar and non polar pesticides. Compiled by Mambanda Isaac (Chief Technician) & Gonzo Muriel(Snr Lab Technician) 13 NPD- Nitrogen Phosphorus Detector; selective, detects polar pesticides. ECD- Electron capture Detector; selective, detects non polar pesticides Stationary Phase: 10% OV101 and 2% OV 17 GLC CONDITIONS Inject Pot temperature: 2300C Column temperature: 2200C Detector temperature: 2500C INJECTION PROCEDURE Inject 1ul of standard pesticide, parathion until there is a consistent retention tin. Inject 1ul of blank prepared the same way as the sample extracts. Inject your unknown sample and record the retention time. Calculate the relative retention time. Inject the various available standards and identify the unknowns by calculating the relative retention time. Questions 1. Why is anhydrous sodium sulphate used in the extraction procedure. 2. Comment on the use of the two solvents; acetone and hexane. 3. Why is it important to make sure that no samples in acetone are injected while using ECD as detector? Discuss and conclude your results. Compiled by Mambanda Isaac (Chief Technician) & Gonzo Muriel(Snr Lab Technician) 14 EXPERIMENT 4: Quantitative Gas Chromatographic Analysis of alcohol in a multicomponent mixture (Internal standard technique) Principle The basis for quantitative analysis by Gas Chromatography is that the area under each peak is proportional to the concentration of the sample compound, assuming constant conditions of column temperature, flow rate, etc The areas of peaks are easily measured using modern electronic integrators. Manual methods include triangulation and cutting and weighing. These manual methods are naturally less accurate. Most instrumental errors can be eliminated by using the internal standard method. In this method, a constant amount of a pure compound (the internal standard) is added to a specific volume of the unknown sample and to several synthetic mixtures containing different amounts of the compound to be measured. The synthetic mixtures are chromatographed first and a plot is made of percent compound versus ratio of peak area of the compound to the peak area of the standard. The unknown is then chromatographed, the peak areas of the compound and internal standard are measured, and their ratio is calculated. The percentage (or concentration) of the compound in the unknown sample is then read from the graph. Results from this technique can be satisfactory reproduced even if operating conditions (such as flow rate and temperature) have varied slightly from run to run. Apparatus and Reagents 1. A gas chromatograph with a Flame ionization detector will be used for this experiment. Please become familiar with the operating instructions for the particular instrument available, including, the direction of the power supply control unit and the record recorder paper available for the recorder. (A good chromatographic column for the experiment uses Porapak Q stationary phase. The column is operated at approximately 1800C giving retention times around 5 minutes). PROCEDURE Preparation of calibration curve solutions 1. Internal standard (n- propanol) – Dilute 0.4ml n-propanol in distilled water and reconstitute to one litre volumetric flask. This solution is 0.04% n-propanol in water. 2. Prepare a 5 %( m/v) ethanol solution in distilled water. The specific gravity of this solution should be 0.9759 at 15.60C at 200C Compiled by Mambanda Isaac (Chief Technician) & Gonzo Muriel(Snr Lab Technician) 15 3. Intermediary Standards Prepare as follows: 1ml of stock (solution) standard to 100ml water= 50mg/dL a) 2ml of stock standard to 100ml water gives 100mg/dL b) 3ml of stock standard to 100ml water gives 150mg/ dL c) 4ml of stock standard to 100ml water gives 200mg/dL d) 5ml of stock (solution) standard to 100ml water= 250mg/dL e) 6ml of stock standard to 100ml water gives 300mg/dL f) 7ml of stock standard to 100ml water gives 350mg/ dL g) 8ml of stock standard to 100ml water gives 400mg/dL 4. WORKING STANDARDS Dilute each intermediary standard (5.0ml in a volumetric flask using the 0.04% n- propanol.Store in a refrigerator. SAMPLE PREPARATION a) Heparin anti-coagulated blood is preferred, although any other anti-coagulant can be used. b) Using a pipette add 5ml of sample (blood) into a 50ml-volumetric flask. c) Into the same volumetric flasks dilute the sample to the mark using the aqueous internal standard 7. GLC Setting a) Connect the column according to instruction in the manual and optimize for about 30 to 60 minutes. b) For Pye Unicam 304, the following would be a general guide line and can be used as a guide line for other instrument type. Column temperature : 1800C Detector temperature : 2500C Compiled by Mambanda Isaac (Chief Technician) & Gonzo Muriel(Snr Lab Technician) 16 Injector temperature : 2300C Hydrogen pressure : 18psi Air pressure : 5psi Nitrogen pressure : 26psi Chart recorder speed : 300mm/hr Chart range : 10mµ 8. Analysis of Standards and Samples a) Inject the highest standard and adjust the instrument for the best resolution. b) Inject each standard and each sample and record peak areas of both ethanol and n-propanol c) Calculate the ratios of ethanol peak areas versus those of n-propanol. d) Calculate the concentration of alcohol in your samples in mg/dL NB: A standard curve can be used to calculate the concentration in each sample, or one can use the standard that has the nearest ratio to that of sample. Questions What are the advantages of using the internal standard technique? Why did you choose your method for area determination? Could you have predicted the exit order of the components without determining their retention times? What factors determined this. Do your chromatogram exibit ‘tailing’ what causes it and what conditions could be changed to prevent it? Reference: 1. Fritz and Schenk ‘Quantitative Analytical Chemistry’ 5th Edn., 1987. Compiled by Mambanda Isaac (Chief Technician) & Gonzo Muriel(Snr Lab Technician) 17 EXPERIMENT 5 UV-VIS Spectroscopy: Colorimetric Determination of Phosphorus in Cola Drinks Phosphorus is a form of phosphate can be determined calometrically by formation of a complex with a molybdate compound in acid solution. The reaction proceeds as follows: 7H3PO4 + 12(NH4)6Mo7O24.4H2O 7(NH4)3[ PO4(MoO3)12] + 51NH4+ 51OH- = 33H20 The colourless hexavalent molybdenum phosphate complex is reduced to a blue pentavalent form by ascorbic acid in acidic medium and can be measured spectrophotometically at 830nm. REAGENTS Make a stock solution (1 litre) of 1000ppm phosphate using potassium dihydrogen phosphate in deionised water. From the stock solution, prepare a working standard solution (100ml) of 10ppm phosphate. Dissolve 1.00g of ammonium heptamolybdate (NH4)6Mo7O24.4H2O in 50ml deionised water. Dissolve 1.75g of ascorbic acid in 100ml of deionised water. Dilute 17ml of concentrated sulphuric acid in 200ml of deionised water. Prepare a reducing solution by mixing 39ml of the ammonium molybdate solution, 60ml of ascorbic acid solution, and 125ml of the diluted sulphuric acid solution in a 250ml volumetric flask and filling to the mark with deionised. Sample A cola soft drink is provided. The sample has been let to stand at atmospheric pressure for at least 24h prior to the practical (why is it important?). Prepare a diluted sample solution (20 x dilution) in a volumetric50ml volumetric flask. Fill to the mark the deionised water. Procedure Pipette in 50ml volumetric flasks suitable quantities of the working standard solution in order to obtain calibration solutions with final concentrations of 0, 0.8, 1.6, 2.4, 3.2, 4.0 and 6.0 ppm PO43Pipette 1ml portions of the diluted sample solution into the three 50ml volumetric flasks. To each of the nine flasks; add 20ml of the reducing solution. Fill up to the mark the deionised water. Heat the calibration and test solutions for 45mins in a water bath at 500C. In the meantime, ensure yourself that the colour of the cola sample will not interfere in the spectrophotometric quantification of the blue pentavalent molybdenum phosphate compound at 830nm. How is this done? Is there any interference from the food colouring? Compiled by Mambanda Isaac (Chief Technician) & Gonzo Muriel(Snr Lab Technician) 18 Measure the absorbance of each solution at 830nm.Plot a calibration curve with the absorbance as a function of the phosphate ion concentration. Calculate the phosphorus (P) content in your sample. Evaluate the precision of the analysis (assuming no error in the calibration procedure), by reporting the 95% confidence limits for the result. Assuming an average consumption of 35bottles (at 300ml) of cola drink per person and year, how much phosphorus is needed annually to meet the production demand in the cola industry in Zimbabwe? ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS D.Lozano-Calero, P.Martin-Palomeque, S.Madueno-Loriguillo, J.CHEM.Educ.1996, 73, 1173-1174 Compiled by Mambanda Isaac (Chief Technician) & Gonzo Muriel(Snr Lab Technician)