Name:
Date:
Honors Spanish, Pd.:
Film Title:
Your Rating:
Excellent! Highly recommended!
Meh. I’ve seen better.
(circle one)
Good film. You won’t be sorry.
Poor. Don’t waste your time.
Recommendation:
Should your classmates consider viewing the movie you chose to watch this
grading period? Make an “X” through your choice for this film.
Criteria for Evaluation
1 pt.
2 pts.
Format:
-12 pt. Helvetica [Arial]
font
-double-spaced
-cover page, complete
Mechanics:
-spelling/grammar
-punctuation
-proper organization
[in paragraphs]
Content:
-includes thesis
statement, underlined
-length [250 min.]
Reflection contained
few, if any, of the
required elements.
Reflection contained
some of the required
elements.
Reflection contained
[almost] all of the
required elements.
Frequent errors in
spelling/grammar,
punctuations and
organization of
ideas.
No thesis statement.
Thesis not
underlined.
Short.
Occasional errors in
spelling/grammar,
punctuation,
organizing ideas.
Few or no errors in
spelling/grammar,
punctuation,
organizing ideas.
Good thesis
statement; underlined.
Appropriate length.
Quality [x2]:
-analysis
-synthesis
-evaluation
-reflection, not review
Little reflection;
mostly summary.
Reflection is
shallow, poorlyreasoned, rambling.
Thesis included;
perhaps not
underlined.
Length may be
inadequate.
Adequate reflection.
Addresses a single
area of reflection; not
rambling.
Perhaps some
summary/ review.
FILM SETTING: Region:
4 pts.
Total Points
Truly a reflection on/
response to the film.
Reflectionfocused,
insightful, makes
inferences &
interpretations, draws
conclusions.
Total
Points
Country:
PLOT SUMMARY [three sentences max.]:
REFLECTION [Start with organizing/thesis statement.] [250 words]:
City:
/20