Energy Savings Initiative for Computers ACNS - February 2002 Background: In November 2001, ACNS presented a plan to the UITSS committee for configuring computer systems and monitors to save energy. IT staff were directed to a web site (www.colostate.edu/Services/acns/energysavings.html) prepared by ACNS for detailed instructions on activating energy savings settings on the various operating systems in use on campus. IT staff were asked to a) review all hardware in their units, b) to configure energy savings settings where possible and c) to report their results by January 2002. All representatives who were asked to complete the reporting form did so, and the results that follow reflect responses from 37 IT staff who oversee the computing in their respective colleges or departments. Results: Reporting was done for three categories of hardware: student lab computers, faculty/staff workstations and “other” computers. For each of the three categories, results show the number of monitors configured (power saver mode when not being used) and the number of systems configured (system hibernation including CPU and hard disk sleep) to save energy. Table 1 below and the graphs on page 3 show the results of activating energy savings settings as reported by the IT staff. A total of 9,175 computers were included in the report. Not all computer equipment was included in this exercise: Results do not include 3000+ student personal computers in the residence halls. Most modern printers automatically go into power-savings mode after a period of inactivity, thus were not included in this initiative. Network devices such as routers and switches were not included. Table 1 Results of Energy Savings for Monitor and Systems Total Set Before* Set Now % Increase 2,468 Lab Monitors 1,163 1,608 27.67 Systems 449 967 53.57 5,956 Faculty/Staff Monitors 3,257 4,523 27.99 Systems 2,331 3,264 28.58 751 Other Monitors 558 589 5.26 Systems 331 343 3.50 Total 9,175 Monitors 4,978 6,720 25.92 Systems 3,111 4,574 31.99 *Some departments had energy savings activated prior to this initiative. % of Total 73.24 49.85 Of the 9,172 computer systems reported on, 73% of monitors and 50% of systems now have Energy-Star features activated. This reflects a 26% increase in the number of monitors configured for energy savings and a 32% increase in the number of systems. Monitors typically are set to go into energy saving mode after 20 minutes of inactivity. Systems typically are set to go to sleep or hibernate mode after a period of inactivity (average settings are hard drive, 30 minutes; CPU, 80 minutes; system hibernate, 90 minutes). It is not practical to assume that 100% of devices could be configured. Older hardware devices do not have Energy-Star compliant features and there is no non-intrusive way to activate Energy-Star for computers running the Windows NT operating system. Comments on the reporting form indicated that at least 1,300 devices fall into these groups. Comments also reflect that at least 40 systems are servers, data collection devices and other production systems that would suffer adverse effects if put into sleep mode. Page 1 of 3 Other comments provided in reports include: Significant use of new low-power consumption flat-panel displays. Reports of systems not set for energy savings because of the personal preferences or work habits of the users involved. IT staff noted they are encouraging those users to power off their computers and monitors at night and particularly for weekends and extended leave times. A number of PC’s do not support Energy-Star settings. Comments indicate that IT staff observe that users typically power down monitors at night and for extended leaves. Generally positive reaction from both UITSS representatives and their users on the energy savings initiative. Some other IT staff felt the cost/time involved in checking hundreds of PC’s for energy savings was not worth the energy savings. Savings: Calculations by ACNS indicate that a savings of $7 per computer system (including the monitor and all other hardware) can be realized on a recurring, annual basis after energy saving settings are applied. ACNS estimates that 60% of the $7 savings can be attributed to energy settings applied to monitors, while 40% can be attributed to the rest of the system. The following calculations show the increased dollar savings as a direct result of the energy savings initiative, as well as the aggregate annual dollar savings realized for all computers at CSU. Incremental savings due to present effort = $11,412.80 Monitors - $7,316.40 Monitors: 1742 more monitors are saving energy now Monitor multiplier = 60% or .6 Annual savings per computer = $7 Increase in savings (monitors) = 1742 * .6 * $7 = $7,316.40 Systems = $4,096.40 Systems: 1463 more systems are saving energy now System multiplier = 40% or .4 Annual savings per computer = $7 Increase in savings (systems) = 1463 * .4 * $7 = $4,096.40 From the energy savings survey results, the total number of monitors currently utilizing energy saving features is 6,720, while the total number of systems utilizing energy saving features is 4,574. Including all systems energy savings, both those configured prior to this initiative and those configured and a result of this initiative: Savings over all systems = $41,031.20 Total savings (monitors) = 6,720 * .6 * $7 = $28,224.00 Total savings (systems) = 4,574 * .4 * $7 = $12,807.20 Summary: The report shows that a significant number of monitors and systems had Energy-Star settings activated prior to the Green is Gold campaign. Posting the directions on the Web for configuring the settings had an impact on increasing the participation another 25-30% and should be continued. ACNS will make the Energy-Star instructions part of the on-going standards review and will update the instructions as new operating systems come on-line. For example, the University has a significant number of Windows NT workstations that cannot now easily be configured. As those computers are upgraded to Windows XP, they will be able to take advantage of Energy-Star features. The Green is Gold campaign likely had a longer term impact on institutionalizing the importance of using the Energy-Star technology. Page 2 of 3 Categorized Energy Savings Results (Before/After) 5000 4500 Number of components 4000 3500 3000 Before 2500 After 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Lab Monitors Lab Systems Faculty/Staff Monitors Faculty/Staff Systems Other Monitors Other Systems Category & Component Energy Savings Aggregate Results 8000 6720 Number set (out of 9175 computers) 7000 6000 4978 5000 4574 Before 4000 3111 3000 2000 1000 0 Aggregate Monitors Aggregate Systems C ompone nt Page 3 of 3 After