Apc and p53 interaction in DNA damage and genomic instability in hepatocytes Runnin Title: Apc and p53 interaction in genomic instability in liver Valérie Méniel$1, Matthias Megges2, Madeleine A Young1, Alicia Cole3, Owen J Sansom3, Alan R Clarke1 Supplementary data: SupFig1: Nuclear -catenin staining showing nearly 100% recombination, cell size, increase in proliferation in APC and APCP53 and decrease in binucleate cells after Apc loss. (A) Nuclear -catenin IHC was used as a surrogate marker for APC recombination in APC and APCP53. (B) More than 80% of Apc is lost at D4 and D6 after induction with naphthoflavone. Same level of recombination in APC and APCP53 (C) Histograms represents the liver weight in grams per mouse. Apc loss in APC mice leads to hepatomegaly after induction with -naphthoflavone compared to Wt (N=3, P=0.0404 MW). The additional loss of p53 does not modify the hepatomegaly phenotype observed in APC (APC vs APCP53, N=3, P=0.6625 MW). (D) Cell size in m2 was measured in Wt, APC, P53 and APCP53 at D4 and D6 after the cell membrane was stained for -catenin (N>200 cells). (E) Brdu and (F) Ki67 immunostaining in Wt, APC, P53 and APCP53. Arrows indicate positive cells (Scale=10m). G: Apc loss leads to a decrease in the number of binucleate cells (2 nuclei per cell). The counting was performed after -catenin IHC where -catenin staining was used to identify the cell membrane. (N=3 mice/genotype, at least 1000 cells were counted). Bars indicate standard error. * indicates P<0.05 by MW: Wt, AhCre+Apcfl/fl (APC), AhCre+P53-/-(P53), AhCre+Apcfl/flp53-/-(APCP53) (N=3 mice for each genotype). (Scale=10m). SupFig2: Nuclear area in Wt and P53, P21 and P53 staining increased in APC and APCP53 and liver histology . (A-B): Cumulative plot of nuclei area in Wt vs P53 at D4 (F) and D6 (G) to show the increase in nuclear area in P53 vs Wt (P=0.01, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, n≥200). C) P53 scoring in APC versus Wt. Increased % P53 positive cells in APC versus Wt. (D) P21 scoring in APC versus Wt. Increased % P21 positive cells in APC versus Wt and in APCP53 versus APC, P53 and Wt.(E)H&E staining showing histology of the liver. Histology of Wt, APC, P53 and APCP53 mice do not reveal any morphological differences between APC and APCP53 livers. Wt, AhCre+Apcfl/fl (APC), AhCre+P53-/-(P53), AhCre+Apcfl/flp53-/-(APCP53), (Scale=100m), Bars indicate standard error. * indicates P<0.05 by MW: (N=3 mice for each genotype). SupFig3: DNA content by Flow cytometry of hepatocytes at D4 and D6 in S phase. We observed no significant difference in cells in S phase between Wt and APC at both time point. Wt, AhCre+Apcfl/fl (APC), AhCre+P53-/-(P53), AhCre+Apcfl/flp53-/-(APCP53), Bars indicate standard error. * indicates P<0.05 by MW: (N=3 mice for each genotype).