Antitrust Case Chart
Morgan – Fall 2006
Page 1 of 6
First Period
1890 – 1914
Price
Fixing
-
-
TransMissouri
(1897)
Addyston
Pipe
(1898)
Second Period
1915 – 1939
“Rule of
Reason”
-
-
-
-
Horizontal Arrangements
-
Market
Division
-
Group
Boycotts
-
Chicago Bd.
of Trade
(1918)
American
Lumber
(1921)
Standard Oil
(Indiana)
(1931)
(patent pool)
Trenton
Potteries
(1927) (per
se)
Appalachian
Coals (1933)
Third Period
1940 – 1973
“Per Se”
-
-
-
-
Eastern
Lumber
Dealers
(1914)
-
-
-
-
-
US Steel
(1920)
-
-
Addyston
Pipe
(1898)
Standard
Oil NJ
(1911)
Terminal
RR (1912)
-
-
-
Monopol
ization
SoconyVacuum
(1940)
Container
Corp. (1969)
Modern Period
1973 – Present
-
-
Timken Roller
Bearing (1951)
Topco (1972)
-
Fashion
Originators
(1941)
Radiant
Burners (1941)
Klor’s v.
BroadwayHale (1969)
(vertical group
boycott)
Topco (1972)
ALCOA (1945)
Griffith (1948)
United Shoe
(1953)
EI DuPont
(1965)
Lorain Journal
(1951)
(unilateral
refusal to deal)
Utah Pie
(1967)
(predatory
pricing)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Goldfarb v. VA
State Bar
(1975)
Nat’l Society
of Engineers
(1978)
BMI (1979)
Catalano v.
Target Sales
(1980)
NCAA (1984)
Texaco v.
Fauad (2006)
(joint-venture)
Polk Bros.
(1985)
Jay Palmer v.
BRG (1990)
NW Stationers
(1985)
Rothery v.
Atlas Van Lines
(1986)
Aspen Skiing
(1985)
(unilateral
refusal to deal)
Verizon v.
Trinko (2004)
(unilateral
refusal to deal)
Matsushita v.
Zenith (1986)
(predatory
pricing)
AA Poultry
(1989)
(predatory
pricing)
Brooke Group
v. B&W (1993)
(predatory
Attempt
to
Monopol
ize
Merger
-
Swift & Co.
(1905)
-
Northern
Securities
(1904)
Antitrust Case Chart
Morgan – Fall 2006
Page 2 of 6
pricing)
- Le Page’s v.
3M (2003)
(predatory
conduct)
- Confederated
Tribes v.
Weyerhaeuser
(2005)
(predatory
buying)
- Microsoft
(2001)
(predatory
conduct)
- Spectrum
Sports v.
McQuillan (US
1993)
-
-
-
-
Brown Shoe
(1962)
Philadelphia
National Bank
(1963)
Von’s Grocery
(1966)
Penn-Olin
(1964) (joint
venture)
El Paso Gas
(1964)
Continental
Can (1964)
Proctor &
Gamble (1967)
(conglomerate)
Falstaff
Brewing
(1973)
-
-
General
Dynamics
(1974)
Kraft (1995)
FTC v. Staples
(1997)
FTC v. Heinz
(2001)
Antitrust Case Chart
Morgan – Fall 2006
Page 3 of 6
First Period
1890 – 1914
Resale
Price
Maintena
nce
-
-
Dr. Miles
(1911)
(minimum)
Colgate
(1919)
Second Period
1915 – 1939
“Rule of
Reason”
-
General
Electric
(1926)
(patent)
Third Period
1940 – 1973
“Per Se”
-
-
Vertical Arrangements
Territori
al
Allocatio
n
-
-
-
Vertical
Integrati
on
(Merger)
Exclusiv
e
Dealing
(Require
ments
Contract
s)
Tying
-
-
-
-
-
Parke-Davis
(1960)
Simpson v.
Union Oil
(1964)
General
Motors (1966)
Albrecht v.
Herald (1968)
(overruled by
State Oil v.
Khan 1997)
White Motor
(1963)
(remands case
to see what
impact of the
restraints would
be on
competition)
Schwinn
(1967)
(overruled by
GTE Sylvania
in 1977)
Albrecht v.
Herald (1968)
Columbia Steel
(1948)
Modern Period
1973 – Present
-
-
-
Monsanto v.
Spray-Rite
(1984)
Business
Electronics v.
Sharp (1988)
State Oil v.
Kahn (1997)
-
GTE Sylvania
(1977)
-
Jefferson
Parish
Hospital
(1984)
Kodak v. ITS
(1992)
Illinois Tool v.
Independent
Ink (2006)
Tampa Electric
(1961)
Standard Oil
(CA) (1949)
Int’l Salt
(1947)
Times
Picayune
(1953)
Northern
Pacific RR
(1958)
Loew’s (1962)
-
-
Fortner (1969)
(but on
remand, found
not to be
illegal)
Tying in Franchise
- Carvel (1964)
- Chicken
Delight (1971)
- McDonalds
(1980)
Antitrust Case Chart
Morgan – Fall 2006
Page 4 of 6
- Microsoft
(1998)
(Background
Case)
Antitrust Case Chart
Morgan – Fall 2006
Page 5 of 6
First Period
1890 – 1914
Jurisdictional / Procedural Issues
Interstat
e
Commer
ce
Foreign
Commer
ce
Second Period
1915 – 1939
“Rule of
Reason”
Third Period
1940 – 1973
“Per Se”
Modern Period
1973 – Present
-
EC Knight
(1895)
-
Summit
Health (1991)
-
American
Banana
(1909)
-
Harford Fire
Insurance
(1993)
HoffmanLaRoche v.
Empagram
(2004)
Brunswick v.
Pueblo Bowl
(1977)
ARCO (1990)
Verizon v.
Trinko (2004)
Cargill v.
Monofort
(1986)
Goldfarb v.
VA State Bar
(1975)
Cal. v. Mical
(1980)
Southern
Motor Carriers
(1985)
Twombly v.
Bell Atlantic
(2005) (plus
factors)
California
Dentist (1999)
(quick look)
Matsushita
(1986)
(summary
judgment)
Professional
Real Estate v.
Columbia
Picture (1993)
“mere” sham)
EBay v.
MercExchan
ge (2006)
(injunction)
-
-
Private
Litigant
Standing
(Antitrus
t Injury)
Keogh v.
Chicago &
NW RR
(1922) (no
standing)
-
-
-
State
Action
Parker v.
Brown (1943)
-
-
-
Standard
of Proof
-
-
-
Remedy
-
Standard
Oil NJ
(1911)
(Dissolutio
n)
-
ALCOA (1945)
(no divestiture)
United Shoe
(1953)
(divestiture)
-
Antitrust Case Chart
Morgan – Fall 2006
Page 6 of 6
-
Terminal
RR (1912)
(Essential
Facility)