SpEd 403/503: Secondary Education for Students with Disabilities Spring 2009 Instructor Dr. Matthew Marino 329 Cleveland Hall Phone: 335 – 6386 Email: matthewmarino@wsu.edu Web http://www.wsu.edu/~matthewmarino/index.html Class Meetings: Thursdays 5:30 – 8:00PM via AMS. Additional Readings, Quizzes, and tests are available on Blackboard https://elearning.wsu.edu/webct/logon/5913387532021 Required Texts: Flexer, R. W., Baer, R. M., Luft, P., & Simmons, T. J. (2008). Transition planning for secondary students with disabilities (3rd Ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Dell, A. G., Newton, D. A., Petroff, J. G. (2008). Assistive technology in the classroom: Enhancing the school experiences of students with disabilities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Course Goals and Objectives By the end of the course, students will… 1. Obtain an increased understanding of historical foundations, transition outcomes, major legislation and current challenges related to transition practices for middle and high school aged youth [CEC 1 & 2; WAEC/CC 3.3] 2. Demonstrate knowledge of appropriate research-based career, vocational, and transition programs for individuals with disabilities [CEC 4, 5, 7, & 9; WAEC/CC 4.14]. 3. Have the ability to use assessment results to develop and monitor transition plans [WAEC/CC 7.3.1.2]. 4. Demonstrate the ability to communicate and integrate assessment results from others as an active team participant who advocates for individuals with disabilities during the development of an Individualized Transition Plan (ITP) [CEC 9; WAEC/CC 7.3.14]. 5. Identify strategies for effectively collaborating with families and other agencies to facilitate transitions including: middle to high school; high school to beyond; individualized alternate settings to school; extended school year; to and from general education [CEC 10; WAEC/CC 7.4.15]. 6. Select, adapt and modify individualized assessment strategies including accommodations, technology, and alternative assessments in order to promote academic success and functional skill development for adolescents with disabilities [CEC 4, 5, & 8; WAEC/CC 7.3.9]. 7. Use technology to implement progress monitoring and use the data to develop and modify instructional plans [WAEC/CC 7.3.1.1] 8. Be able to determine appropriate accommodations, modifications, technology, and alternatives assessments including when to apply each in classroom, district, and state testing [WAEC/CC 3.5]. 9. Gain an increased understanding of the universal design theoretical framework as a means to develop, implement, and assess lesson plans which align with the general curriculum including state learning goals, EALRs, GLEs. [CEC 1; WAEC/CC 7.4.5] Course Description SpEd 403/503 is designed for both pre-service and practicing special education teachers. The course focuses on a broad range of issues related to inclusion, universal design, assistive technology, self-determination curricula, transition planning, web-based learning experiences, and collaboration. Students in the course investigate interventions and supports for middle and high school students with disabilities who are served in secondary public school settings. The goal of this course is to improve students’ understanding of the specialized knowledge and skills necessary to create, implement, and monitor programs for secondary students with disabilities. Conceptual Framework The College of Education contributes to the theory and practice of the broad field of education, and dedicates itself to understanding and respecting learners in diverse cultural contexts. We facilitate engaged learning and ethical leadership in schools and clinical settings. We seek collaboration with diverse constituencies, recognizing our local and global responsibilities to communities, environments, and future generations. To address this conceptual framework, students in SpEd 403/503 Spring 2008 2 this class will work both individually and collectively to learn and disseminate information to colleagues, parents, and schools. Students with Disabilities We are committed to providing assistance to help you be successful in this course. Reasonable accommodations are available for students with a documented disability. Please visit the Disability Resource Center (DRC) during the first two weeks of every semester to seek information or to qualify for accommodations. All accommodations MUST be approved through the DRC (Admin Annex Bldg, Rooms 205). Call 509 335 3417 to make an appointment with a disability counselor. Academic Integrity Academic integrity will be strongly enforced in this course. Any student caught cheating on any assignment will be given an F for the course and will be referred to the Office of Student Conduct. I encourage you to work with classmates on assignments. However, each student must turn in original work. No copying will be accepted. Students who violate the WSU Policy on Academic Integrity will receive an F as a final grade in this course. Academic integrity is the cornerstone of the university. Any student who attempts to gain an unfair advantage over other students by cheating, will fail the course. You must do your own work. Violations to academic integrity include plagiarism. Plagiarism is presenting the information, ideas, or phrasing of another person as the student's own work without proper acknowledgement of the source. This includes submitting a commercially prepared paper or research project or submitting for academic credit any work done by someone else. The term "plagiarism" includes, but is not limited to, the use, by paraphrase or direct quotation, of the published or unpublished work of another person without full and clear acknowledgment. It also includes the unacknowledged use of materials prepared by another person or agency engaged in the selling of term papers or other academic materials. Plagiarism will be reported to the College of Education Student Services office and the Office of Student Conduct and will result in an F for the course. Professional Dispositions Teacher preparation programs at Washington State University assess the “professional dispositions” of all teacher candidates. This assessment occurs throughout the Master in Teaching program, both in courses and in field experiences. A description of the University’s use of professional dispositions is available at http://www.educ.wsu.edu/TL/dispositions.htm, as well as the actual form used, when necessary, to communicate concerns and remediation. Attendance Policy This course meets requirements for state legislated credentials; therefore, attendance is mandatory. 1. Students are expected to attend each scheduled class punctually and remain for its entirety. Tardiness and/or leaving during breaks or during class session will be counted as an absence. 2. Non-preparation will be considered nonattendance for grading purposes. Class preparation and participation are assumed and expected. 3. When class attendance is not possible, an absence will be excused if the student provides written verification that it falls under University guidelines, i.e., “illness, personal crises, mandated court appearances, parental responsibilities, and the like.” Such absences may be accommodated when contact is made in advance and all work is completed within the assigned week. Unless an extreme circumstance arises, absences beyond two will be considered excessive and result in a grade no higher than a B regardless of the quality of student work. Class Expectations Attendance, by itself, is insufficient. For each class session, students must competently engage in its events. In general, this involves exhibiting a professional demeanor and being prepared to consider, discuss, and apply assigned readings. In accordance with University policy, basic expectations include showing due respect for order, morality, and the rights of others. Grading 94 – 100 points A 90 – 93 points 87 – 89 points 84 – 86 points 80 – 83 points 77 – 79 points AB+ B BC+ 76 – 74 points 70 – 73 points 67 – 69 points 64 – 66 points 60 – 63 points < 60 points C CD+ D DF SpEd 403/503 Spring 2008 Course Evaluation Criteria Possible Points 10 20 15 15 10 All Students ~ Class Participation All Students ~ Two Quizzes All Students ~ Transition Exam All Students ~ Assistive Technology Assessment 403: Transition Plan Including Technology-based Data Collection and Report System - Draft 403: Transition Plan Including Technology-based Data Collection 15 and Report System - Final 403: Facilitate a Mock Transition Plan meeting 15 503: Presentation / PowerPoint on selected reading 15 Students in 503 have the option to submit a transition plan as described above or an individual project described below. 503: Individual research project proposal related to transition or AT 5 503: Individual projects – teaching tools 20 Total Possible Points: 100 Assignments 3 Provides Evidence of Course Objective(s) 1-9 4&5 1-3, 5, 6 8, 9 3, 4, 6, & 7 3, 4, 6, & 7 1-9 1&2 1-9 1–9 Transition Plan Including Technology-based Data Collection and Report System Each 403 student will develop a transition plan that includes a technology-based data collection system. Students will submit two drafts of this assignment each worth fifteen points. The transition plan will be based on a transition plan template we develop as a class. Your plan should include the following minimum requirements: Relevant background information Person-centered Planning Continuing education Employment preferences Community participation Social Participation Home living Functional academic skills assessments Management, planning, and vocational assessments Ecological inventories Instructional strategies Evaluation Summary Recommendations Objectives, criterion, and electronic assessment templates Assistive Technology options Assistive Technology Evaluation All students will evaluate three assistive technology devices using an online survey. Students in Section 503 have the following assignments SpEd 503: Presentation / PowerPoint summary of a selected reading Each student in section 503 will have 20 minutes to present a summary of a selected reading to the class. The presentation should include key concepts and vocabulary from the article, as well as implications for future special education teachers. In other words, what should special education teachers do with this information? After your presentation you should have a 10 – 20 minute activity for the class that prompts the group as a whole or individually to construct a product or have an experience that relates to the reading. Consider that some students will not have partners based on their location. We will assign readings during class. SpEd 403/503 Spring 2008 4 Individual Project & Proposal This course is designed to provide you with the opportunity to create a meaningful product that demonstrates your mastery of the course objectives. Your proposal should include a rationale for your project, a detailed description of the contents that will be included, and a rubric for evaluating the project. The rubric should include a column that identifies how each criterion aligns with the course objectives. You must address at least one component of EACH of the nine course objectives in your project. You do not need to address every item in each objective. For example, if you decide to write a case study about a student who is preparing for the transition process, you could include a reference to the laws surrounding transition in the introduction to the case study and achieve objective 1 from the syllabus. The proposal should be 3 – 5 pages in length. Examples of appropriate projects include transition case studies, resource guide manuals, and research papers. Once your proposal has been approved, you will spend approximately six weeks completing the project. Time will be allotted each week during class to allow for collaboration and feedback from the instructor on your projects. Design your project so that you have a meaningful product at the conclusion of this course that will make your lives as special education teachers easier! All projects should include a table of contents and a minimum of 15 relevant references. Use APA 5 to reference your work. Additional information regarding the course evaluation criteria will be presented in class. SpEd 403/503 Spring 2008 Course Schedule Tentative Topic Schedule Additional Readings for 503 students Introduction to the Course Week 1 Section 403 & 503 Readings Due Assessments Due Pretest January 15 Week 2 Introduction to Transition Universal Design for Learning Flexer Chapters 1 & 2 January 22 Week 3 Cultural Consideration when Developing Transition Plans January 29 Bond, R. & Castagnera, E. (2006). Peer supports and inclusive education: An underutilized resource. Theory into Practice, 45(3), 224-229. Conderman, G. J., & Katsiyannis, A. (2002). Instructional issues and practices in secondary special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 23, 167179. Week 4 Assistive Technology (AT) Introduction February 5 Alper, S. & Raharinirina, S. (2006). Assistive technology for individuals with disabilities: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(2), 47-64. Week 5 Edyburn, D. L. (2004). Rethinking assistive technology. Special Education Technology Practice, 5(4), 16-23. AT - Types of AT Flexer Chapters 3 & 4 Shelly Angy Dell Chapters 1 - 3 503 Proposals Gale Dell Chapters 4 & 5 Lahm, E. A., Bell, J. K., Blackhurst, A. E., Abner, G., Bausch, M., Case, et. al. (2002). UKAT Toolkit. http://edsrc.coe.uky.edu/ www/ukatii February 12 Marino, M. T., Marino E. C., & Shaw, S. (2006). Making informed assistive technology decisions for students with high incidence disabilities, Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(6), 18-25. Christensen, R., Overall, T., & Knezek, G. (2006). Personal educational tools (PETs) for Type II learning. Computers in the Schools, 23(1/2), 173-189. Ken Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. C. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3&4), 350-391 Theresa 5 SpEd 403/503 Spring 2008 Tentative Topic Schedule Additional Readings for 503 students Week 6 AT Access issues February 19 Kirschner, P.A., & Erkens, G. (2006). Cognitive tools and mindtools for collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(2), 199209. MacArthur, C. A., Ferretti, R. P., Okolo, C. M., & Cavalier, A. R. (2001). Technology applications for students with literacy problems: A critical review. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 273-301. Section 403 & 503 Readings Due Dell Chapters 6 - 8 QIAT Consortium. (2002). The QIAT SelfEvaluation Matrices. http://sweb.uky.edu/~jsza ba0/QIAT.html Cindy Theresa Maccini, P., Gagnon, J. C. & Hughes, C. A. (2002). Technology-based practices for secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, Ben 25, 247-261. Week 7 AT for Communication Dell Chapters 9 - 11 February 26 Englert, C.S., Wu, X., & Zhao, Y. (2005). Cognitive tools for writing: Scaffolding the performance of students through technology. Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice, 20(3), 184-198. Week 8 Higgins, K., Boone, R., & Williams, D. (2000). Evaluating educational software for special education. Intervention is School and Clinic, 36(2), 109-115. AT in transition planning March 5 Nelson, B. (2006). On your mark, get set, wait! Are your teacher candidates prepared to embed assistive technology in teaching and learning? College Student Journal, 40(3), 485-494. Quintana, C., Zhang, M., & Krajcik, J. (2005). A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software-based scaffolding. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 235-244. Assessments Due Quiz I Matt Dell Chapters 12 & 13 Assess 3 AT devices 6 SpEd 403/503 Spring 2008 Week 9 Tentative Topic Schedule Additional Readings for 503 students Transition Assessment / writing transition plans March 12 Reed, P. R. & Lahm, E. A. (2005). A resource guide for teachers and administrators about assistive technology (general edition). http://wati.org/?pageLoad=content/supports/free/index.php SPRING BREAK Week 11 Section 403 & 503 Readings Due Flexer Chapters 5 & 6 Carolyn 7 Assessments Due Quiz II Silver-Pacuilla, H. (2007). Assistive technology and adult literacy: Access and benefits. Review of Adult Learning and Literacy, 7, 93-136. MARCH 19th – No class Instructional Planning and Teaching Methods March 26 Gardner, J. E., Wissick, C. A., Schweder, W., & Canter, L. S. (2003). Enhancing interdisciplinary instruction in general and special education: Thematic units and technology. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 161-172. Flexer Chapters 7 & 8 Grossen, B. (2004). Success of a direct instruction model at a secondary level school with high-risk students. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 20, 161-178. Week 12 Week 13 Keefe, E. B., & Moore, V. (2004). The challenge of co-teaching in inclusive classrooms at the high school level: What the teachers told us. American Secondary Education, 32(3), 77-88. April 2 - CEC convention Seattle – No class Flexer Chapters 9 & 10 Email Transition Plan Draft Postsecondary Education Opportunities Transition to employment Flexer Chapters 11 & 12 503 Special Projects April 9 McGuire, J., Scott, S., & Shaw, S. (2006). Universal design for learning and its applications in educational environments. Remedial and Special Education, 27(3), 166-175. Burgstahler, S. (2003). The role of technology in preparing youth with disabilities for postsecondary education and employment. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18(4), 7-19. Jessica Therasa SpEd 403/503 Spring 2008 Week 14 Tentative Topic Schedule Additional Readings for 503 students Self-determination in Transition Planning Planning for Mock Transition Planning Meeting Section 403 & 503 Readings Due Flexer Chapters 13 & 14 Coordinating Transition Services Flexer Chapter 15 Mock Transition Planning Meetings TBA 8 Assessments Due Transition Exam April 16 Week 15 April 23 Week 16 April 30 Final draft of Transition Plan Due!!!