Forest Management Review April 24th Final May 1 Time 10:00am – 12:00pm Topics Models: Predicting Forest Outcomes and Conditions: Lectures March 11, 13 and 18. Chapter 5 from Davis. Timber Harvest Schedules (The classics. Regulated forests, even age, uneven age systems) Chapter 10 from Davis, and the hand outs provided. Financial planning. Lectures from March 27 – April 3. Chapters 6 and 7 from Davis. Multi-temporal and spatial scale aspects in Management April 8th lecture. Kohm and Franklin Chapter 14, Gustafson, and Gustafson and Crow papers. Fuel and Wildfire Management. National Fire Plan. Kohm and Franklin chapter 12 Management of spatially distributed resources. Hand outs on GIS . Queen and Blinn article, and The chapter from Maguire, Goodchild and Rhind “Geographic Information Systems” Loomis Chapter 5. Models: Predicting Forest Outcomes and Conditions: Lectures March 11, 13 and 18. Chapter 5 from Davis. Whole Stand Models Density-Free Models Variable Density Models Diameter Class Models Empirical stand table projections Diameter class growth models Individual Tree Models Distance Dependent Models Distance Independent Models Buckman (1962): Red Pine Minnesota. First study in USA that directly predicted growth from stand variables Density is explicitly considered in model: Basal area, but could be number of trees, or volume per acre or other measure. Different growth at different ages, but the same growth at different basal area for same age. Y = 1.6 + .041066BA – 0.00016303BA2 - 0.076958A + 0.0002274141A2 + 0.06441S Y = Periodic Net annual basal area increment BA = basal area in square feet per acre A = Age in year S = Site index Volume growth tables developed by combining 1) basal area growth equation 2) a height growth table 3) stand volume equation V = ƒ (K, BA, H) Diameter Class Models: Separately simulate growth in each dbh class Growth = inventoried # of stemsdbh X average tree dbh Tree growth is projected on a diameter class basis & then aggregated to the stand level Stand Growth = ∑ (Volumes of all dbh classes) Two General Forms o Actual radial increment data o Generalized growth functions Ni, t + 1 = Nit + Ii – Ui – Mi - Ci Notation: Ni, t + 1 Number of trees in dbh class I at time t + 1 (the next survey period) Nit = Number of trees in dbh class I at time t (first survey period) Ii = number entering dbh class from smaller classes Ui = number growing into larger classes Mi = mortality Ci = harvested A. Individual Tree Models Crown Competition Index: measure of how well a tree competes and captures light, nutrition, and growing space relative to other trees in the stand. Used as a basis for determining life or death of the tree in the stand simulation If it lives: diameter growth, height, and crown size is simulated. Distance-dependent: measured or mapped tree to tree distances Distance-independent: only subject tree is considered aggregated stand characteristics are used. Major difference between stand and individual tree models: 1. Individual tree models consider competitive environment 2. Stand models aggregate individual tree data into stand info before operating the growth model. Individual tree models do this after the model grows each tree. --------------------------------------------------------------------Timber Harvest Schedules (The classics. Regulated forests, even age, uneven age systems) Chapter 10 from Davis, and the hand outs provided. Classical Timber Harvest Scheduling How many acres and how much volume can be cut? Area Control: Regulated forests can be achieved on 1 rotation but with short term harvest sacrifice Volume control: Stable harvest can be achieved in near future but at the sacrifice of not achieving a regulated forest after the 1st rotation. Importance of Site Quality SI 80 SI 100 SI 90 SI 70 SI 80 SI 60 SI 50 Since site quality differs, productivity differs. In the evenaged forest the regulated forest A/R are harvested since growth = harvest. Because the productivity of the whole forest varies the basic model doesn’t work. Now harvest areas of equal productivity rather than equal area. Adjusting harvested volume by site quality provides the management alternative. Cut more from lower productivity sites, and less higher site index sites. Calculation of LTSY Determine rotation age for each site class, Calculate the MAI for each site class at the selected rotation LTYS is equal to the sum over site classes of the MAI for the site class LTSY = ∑ [ MAI R X As ] Site Class 1 2 3 Acres 4200 5600 3500 Rotation 35 45 50 Yield at Rotation 41 46 48 LTSY = 4200(41/35) + 5600(46/45) + 3500(48/50) LTSY =14,004 cords / year Financial Analysis Future Value Equation: Vn = Vo(1 + i)(1 + i) … (1 + i) Present Value Equation: Vn = Vo(1 + i) n Earnings Rate Equation: Solve for i in terms of Vn, Vo and N Vn = Vo (1 + i) n Vo (1 + i) n = Vn (1 + i) n = Vn / Vo (1 + i) n = Vn / Vo i = √ Vn / Vo – 1 where the root is nth root Present Value of a perpetual periodic series Vo = p / (1+i)t + p /(1+i)2t + p /(1+i) 3t … + p / (1+i)∞ Vo = p / (1 + i) t - 1 Uneven-aged Management based on harvesting species by dbh class, rather than age. Need a decision tool to help make choice for electing to harvest individual trees at different periods of time. Duerr (1956) developed a financial maturity guide 1. Determine guiding rate of return 2. calculate the current stumpage value 3. Est. the stumpage value of the tree at various potential harvest ages 4. Compare highest values increase in terms of a compound annual rate of value increase with the guiding rate of return. Find the compound rate of values increases SVo = current stumpage value SVn = value at the end of the nth planning period i = compound interestrate solve for i SVo(1+i)n = SVn (1 + i) n = SVn / SVo or 1 + i = n√ SVn / SVo 32.31 / 22.17 = 1.048 interest is .048 or 4.8% compare interest against the guiding rate of 4% and elect to allow tree to grow. Rotation Decisions 1. 2. 3. 4. What kind of silvicultural treatments are necessary When will they be accomplished What intensity when will the harvest occur Bare ground in Douglas fir region Estimate 50 year SI of 105 How long should the stand be allowed to grow? Growth and yield simulator Simulate the growth for SI 105 returns maximum average growth at 80 years. MAI = 146ft3 / year Price to initiate the stand Site preparation $120.00 /ac Planting $100.00 /ac Annual mgt cost $ 3.00/ac Guiding rate of 4% NPV1 = VRPR / (1+i)R - T[(1+i) R -1] / i(1+i) R-G VR = cubic ft vol/ac harvested at R(rotation age) VR = price cubic ft harvested at R T = annual management cost G = regeneration costs i = guiding interest rate / year R = rotation age in years 8212 x .75 NPV1 3[(1 + .04)60 – 1] = -------------- - -------------------- - 220 = $298 (1+.04)60 .04(1+.04)60