Climatology of precipitation extremes in Estonia using the method of moving precipitation totals Tiina Tammets, Jaak Jaagus Abstract Kokkuvõte andmetest, metoodikast ja tulemustest. 1. Introduction Precipitation is the climatic variable having the highest variability in space and time. Therefore, precipitation extremes – continuing period with small or without precipitation, which leads to droughts as well as heavy rainfall inducing flash floods – are related to the most severe damages for human activity nearly at all regions of the world. It is the reason that the analysis of extreme precipitation and drought events and their long-term trends has become an important topic in climatological research. Generally, an increase in extreme precipitation events is observed and proposed that it is connected with possible climate warming in future (Groisman et al. 2005). Analysing changes in climatic extremes during the second half of the 20th century, significant increases revealed in the extreme amount of precipitation derived from wet spells and number of heavy rainfall events (Frich et al. 2002). At the same time, a significant decreasing trend in global series of the annual maximum of consecutive dry days (CDD) was noticed. Similar trends have been detected by many local studies (Karl and Knight 1998; Stone et al. 2000; Osborn et al. 2000; Zhang et al. 2001; Frei and Schär 2001; Alpert et al. 2002; Kiktev et al. 2003; Sen Roy and Balling 2004; Schmidli and Frei 2005). Increasing frequency of droughts is also evident in different regions of the world (Dai et al. 2004; Zou et al. 2005; Groisman et al. 2007; Balling and Goodrich 2010). A detail overview on studies in the precipitation extremes, droughts and wet spells in the Baltic Sea region is presented by the BACC Author Team (2008). The CDD trends are mostly insignificant in this region (Frich et al. 2002; Haylock and Goodess 2004). A slightly decreasing insignificant trend of CDD revealed in Norway and Sweden (Førland 2000; Alexandersson 2002) while a positive trend was detected in Germany for summer season (Klein Tank and Können 2003). Different indices of heavy rainfall events indicate positive tendencies but also no changes in the Baltic Sea region during the second half of the 20th century. The number of days with precipitation ≥10 mm has increased in German mountain stations and in western Norway (Heino et al. 1999). Maximum number of consecutive wet days has increased in many stations over Scandinavia during 1961-2004 (Achberger and Chen 2006). Simple daily intensity index (SDII) increased significantly in central and western Europe in winter 1921-1999 (Moberg and Jones 2005). All these studies did not cover data from the territory of Estonia. The previous results are approved by new investigations during recent years. Using ensembles of simulations from a general circulation model (HadCM3), large changes in the frequency of 90th percentile precipitation events over Europe in winter are found from changes in the NAO from 1960s to 1990s (Scaife et al. 2008). This would lead to increased occurrence of heavy precipitation over northern Europe and decreased occurrence over southern Europe during high NAO periods. Zolina et al. (2009) obtained mostly positive trends of daily precipitation and precipitation totals at 116 stations in different regions of Europe, including the Baltic Sea region, during 1950–2000. The positive trends were characteristic for winter and spring while the negative trends occurred mostly in summer and, in some cases in autumn. Wet periods when daily precipitation R>1 mm have become longer over most of Europe by about 15-20% during 1950–2008 (Zolina et al. 2010). The lengthening of wet periods was not caused by an increase of the total number of wet days. Becoming longer, wet periods in Europe are now characterized by more abundant precipitation. Heavy precipitation events during the last two decades have become much more frequently associated with longer wet spells and intensified in comparison with 1950s and 1960s (Zolina 2011). An increasing trend in the 95 and 99 percentiles were detected in winter, spring and autumn, and negative trend in summer in the northern Germany in 1950–2004 (Zolina et al. 2008). Positive trends were detected for the number of wet spells and days with precipitation at five stations in Poland during the second half of the 20th century while negative trends revealed for mean precipitation during a given spell (Wibig 2009). Positive as well as negative trends in indices of precipitation extremes were detected at 48 synoptic stations in Poland during 1951–2006 but the part of decreasing trends was prevailing (Łupikasza 2010). The highest number of decreasing trends revealed in summer but the number of increasing trend was more pronounced in spring and autumn. Increasing trends in time series of number of days with heavy precipitation (above 10 mm) and of percentage of heavy precipitation in the total annual amount were detected in Lithuania during 1961-2008 (Rimkus et al. 2011). This tendency is especially clear in summer months when an increase in precipitation extremity can be observed on the background of neutral or negative tendencies in the total summer precipitation. A significant increase in number of days with heavy precipitation (≥10 mm) has been observed also in Latvia during 1924-2008 (Avotniece et al 2010). Statistically significant trends in two drought indices were not detected for Vilnius, Lithuania, in 1891–2010 while a small decrease in dryness was observed (Valiukas 2011). Although Estonia is characterised by a humid climate where annual precipitation exceeds annual evaporation, drought periods are rather often during the warm half-year. They cause severe damages for human activity – loss of agricultural production, water shortage, forest fires, expanding of different diseases etc. Flash floods caused by heavy rainfall and continuing wet periods make serious problems for agriculture, transport and everyday life of local residents. Estonia is located on the eastern coast of the Baltic Sea between 57.5 and 59.5 degrees north. Climatically, it lies in the transitions zone between the area of rather maritime climate on islands and on the coast of the Baltic Sea in the west, and the area of much more continental climate in the southeast and east. Precipitation regime is similar to that of the neighbouring regions with maximum rainfall in summer and autumn, and with the minimum in winter and spring. The annual mean amount of precipitation in Estonia varies between 550 mm in the coastal zone up to 750 mm on the windward slopes of uplands (Jaagus and Tarand 1988). Time series analysis has revealed an increasing trend in winter and autumn (Jaagus 1996). Clear periodical fluctuations of 50-60, 25-30 and 6-7 years have been detected for annual precipitation in Estonia since 1866 (Jaagus 1992). Relationships between atmospheric circulation and precipitation are the highest in winter and spring (Keevallik et al. 1999; Keevallik 2003; Jaagus 2006). Dependence of precipitation pattern on local landscape characteristics in the three Baltic countries are analysed using data mining tools (Jaagus et al. 2010; Remm et al. 2011). Extreme precipitation events in Estonia were analysed in relation to types of large-scale atmospheric circulation (Grosswetterlagen) (Merilain and Post 2006) and cyclones of different trajectories (Mätlik and Post 2008). It was found that more than 25% of all heavy rainfall events (at least 50 mm per 24 hours) in Estonia have been caused by the southern cyclones originated in the region of the Black and Mediterranean Seas. The frequency of 95 and 99 percentile daily precipitation events at 40 stations in Estonia has increased significantly during 1961–2008 (Päädam and Post 2011). The main disadvantage of the studies on extreme precipitation and extreme dry spells is calculation of characteristics of extremes in discrete time intervals (seasons, months, ten-day periods, days etc.). To estimate water content in the soil, it is not so important to know how much it has rained during the observed period but how much it has been rained before that period. In other words, for many purposes it is essential not to show how much rains in a day but to show how much it has been rained till this day. Following this ideology, the first author of the current article has proposed a methodology for analysing precipitation extremes using moving precipitation totals (Tammets 2007; 2010). Using it, wet and dry days have been defined and their numbers are analysed for Estonia. A day is considered as extremely wet when the moving total of precipitation is at least 10 mm on ten successive days leading up to this day, and as extremely dry when there was no precipitation during the successive twenty days till the observed day. An increase in the number of extreme (wet and dry) days was distinguished during 1957-2006. Minimal and maximal precipitation totals for any time periods (number of following days, months or years using moving totals) in a station has been calculated with the aid of moving averages in Jõgeva, Pärnu and Ristna (Tammets 2010). This study is a continuation of the previous one. Its main objectives are: to analyse the usual characteristics of precipitation extremes and detect long-term changes; to elaborate a method characterising climatology of extreme precipitation totals for any time periods (number of following days, months or years using moving totals); to detect the most severe wet and dry spells in Estonia during last 50 years; to analyse trends in the frequency of precipitation extremes using different methods and to compare the results. 2. Data and method Daily precipitation data at 51 stations (25 meteorological stations and 26 precipitation stations) over Estonia (Figure 1) during 53 years (1957-2009) was used as initial data in this study. The stations were selected according to the quality and continuity of time series. There were only very few gaps in the data series, which were filled by measured data from a neighbouring station located in the similar landscape conditions and having the highest correlation. There have been relocations of the measuring sites at Tallinn, Tartu, Narva and Pärnu stations, which may cause inhomogeneities in the data series. It is difficult to detect the influence of data inhomogeneity on estimates of precipitation extremes. Therefore, the time series used are considered reliable. All the daily precipitation totals are registered at 06 p.m. GMT. The only exception was the period from 11 February 2005 until 30 April 2009 when the measurements in the meteorological stations were made in the morning of the next day at 06 a.m. GMT. The precipitation measurements have been made manually using Tretyakov gauges. Since 1966 a wetting correction 0.2 mm was added to every measurement if at least 0.1 mm was recorded. Some gaps in 2009 are filled using data from automatic weather station MILOS 520, which are less reliable. The VRG type automatic precipitation gauge was introduced in Kuressaare since 1 January 2008 and in Heltermaa since 1 May 2009. For many purposes it is essential not to know how much it has rained during a day but to show how much has been rained till this day. A day is extreme day, if the amount of precipitation till this day has been too small or too large. The preliminary task, when looking at dry or wet spells, is to define a dry and a wet day. The simplest definition of dry day is zero rainfall, and of wet day is the day with precipitation threshold, depending on climate conditions of observed area. Fig. 1. Location map of precipitation stations in Estonia used in this study In our study we specify extremely wet and extremely dry conditions for a day by counting of the moving total of daily precipitation data till this day. So, an extremely wet or dry day is a day with too much or too few precipitation in a period, which lasts n days and ends in observed day. Limits of the precipitation amount M and number of subsequent days n in observed period depends on the study object, which could be agricultural field, river basin etc. In agrometeorological studies these limits depend on the species of plant, state of vegetation, soil conditions, air temperature, humidity etc. Counting of the moving total of precipitation goes through the whole observed time without separating time to the month or the year. To point on the meteorological, agrometeorological, hydrological or socioeconomical drought or flooding conditions described indicators should be calculated for determined number of days n and thresholds M (Tammets 2007; 2010). Mathematically the sequence of moving totals (averages){sj(n),1 j N-n+1} is derived from a sequence {ai, 1 i N} obtained by taking the totals (averages) of the subsequent n terms: sj(n)=aj (by moving averages sj(n)= aj), where N is the total number of days in the precipitation time series and n the number of days through which the moving average is calculated. We find extremely dry and extremely wet days after calculating sj(n) with time period n for each day i in precipitation time series choosing the days with values of sj(n), that are smaller or larger than the given threshold M (Fig. 2). So, a wet or a dry day is a day with too much or too little precipitation till this day (month) in a specified period for a specific object. if there are no precipitation on a day and previous n days the day has been counted as a droughtday days 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 days 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 17 21 21 22 23 22 23 if the average of precipitations on a day and previous n days is M mm and more the day has been counted as a wetday 18 19 20 Fig. 2. Scheme for calculation of extremely dry days and extremely wet days using a moving precipitation total of the preceding days. In this example, n = 20 in case of drought days and n = 10 in case of wet days In different studies and climate conditions instead of the daily time step monthly or even annual time step could be used for calculation of moving totals of precipitation. Soil moisture conditions respond to precipitation anomalies in a relatively short scale. Groundwater, stream flow and reservoir storage reflect the longer-term precipitation anomalies. Extreme precipitation totals for a year and longer period is one of the essential factors of the water balance in the region. To find the extreme precipitation totals of any number of days in observed period has been built graphs with the y-axis showing maximum and minimum of moving total of precipitation in dependence on the number of days or months in the calculated period, showed on the x-axis (Fig. 3 and 4) (Tammets 2010). The maximum curve on the daily graph (Fig. 3) shows values of maximum precipitation and the minimum curve minimum precipitation in dependence on n (number of days) in observed period. These graphs have been calculated over 51 Estonian meteorological stations during 1957–2009 and could use as one characteristics of precipitation regime for Estonia. To analyse the moisture conditions in a certain period, for example the vegetation period of a crop), after calculating of moving totals in a precipitation time series we need to separate only the days of this period or season. The precipitation totals of these days shows then, which has been moisture conditions in this period. In agrometeorological studies some limits for defining extreme weather conditions in Estonia are given (Kivi 1998). Extremely wet conditions are observed when the mean daily precipitation amount is equal to or more than 10 mm during consecutively 10 days ( n = 10). So we calculate the sequences si (10) giving moving total for 10-day periods. If si >= 100 mm, the last day of the period has been counted as a extremely wet day (EWD). Extremely dry conditions for field plants emerges if there are no precipitation in duration of consecutively 20 days ( n = 20). If si = 0, the last day of the period has been counted as an extremely dry day (EDD). Extremely wet days and also extremely dry days frequently follow each other. In such case, the number of EWD or the number of EDD show intensity of a wet or a dry spell. In some years the number of wet or dry spells is two or more. total precipitation, mm 1000 absolute maximum of stations 900 lowest maximum of stations 800 absolute minimum of stations 700 highest minimum of stations 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 number of days 4000 absolute minimum of stations highest minimum of stations 3 years 3500 absolute maximum of stations 3000 2 years lowest maximum of stations 2500 2000 1 year precipiation total, mm 4 years Fig. 3. Maximum and minimum totals of precipitation in Estonian meteorological stations in 19572009 in dependence of number of days in the period 1500 1000 500 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 number of months Fig. 4. Maximum and minimum totals of precipitation in Estonian meteorological stations in 19572009 in dependence of number of months in the period To estimate differences between the number of extremely dry days when the amount of precipitation has been 0 mm and 1 mm (maximum error measurements with Tretyakov gauge for the 20 days) we calculated also the number of extremely dry days when the precipitation amount in consecutively 20 days ( n = 20) is only 1 mm (EDD1). Annual and seasonal number of extremely dry and wet days (EDD, EDD1, EWD) was calculated for every 51 station during the period 1957-2009. To analyse of inter-annual variability of the average number of wet and dry days EDD and EWD together the relative number of dry and wet days has been calculated dividing the number of in a year to the average of 1957-2009. Also the relative number of extremely wet and dry days in every season: spring (MAM), summer (JJA), autumn (SON) and winter (DJF) has been also calculated. Annual, seasonal and monthly precipitation totals are used to characterise general precipitation regime in Estonia. Numbers of extremely wet days (EWD) and extremely dry days (EDD) in 19572009 was compared with the other, more frequently used indices of precipitation extremes. In this study we used the following indices. Wet conditions SDII – simple daily intensity index: annual total precipitation divided by the number of days with R ≥ 1 mm (mm/wet day); CWD – maximum number of consecutive wet days R ≥ 1 mm (days); R10mm – number of heavy precipitation days R ≥ 10 mm (days); R20mm – number of heavy precipitation days R ≥ 20 mm (days); RX1day – the highest 1-day precipitation amount; RX5day – the highest 5-day precipitation amount; R95p – days with RR> 95th percentile daily amount (R ≥ 1 mm); R99p – days with RR> 99th percentile daily amount (R ≥ 1 mm). Dry conditions CDD – maximum number of consecutive dry days R < 1 mm; XCDD – maximum number of consecutive dry days R = 0 mm; PDD – probability of a dry day following a dry day (mean dry-day persistence); DSMEA1 - mean dry spell length with R < 1mm; DSMEA0 – mean dry spell length with R = 0 mm. These indices of precipitation extremes are calculated for every station by years and seasons. Then their mean values are found. In addition, absolute maximum values of the indices with corresponding year and station name are determined. Maps for the indices of precipitation extremes are drawn to analyse spatial and seasonal distribution of extreme precipitation and droughts in Estonia. Precipitation data as well as many indices of precipitation extremes are not normally distributed. Therefore, the Sen’s method and Mann-Kendall test (Salmi et al 2002) are used for trend analysis. Trends are expressed in millimetres per decade. Trends are considered statistically significant on the p<0.05 level. 3. Results 3.1. Mean precipitation regime in Estonia Before the analysis of extreme precipitation it is reasonable to describe mean precipitation regime based on the data used in this study. Spatio-temporal variability of precipitation is very high on the territory of Estonia. Variability of indices of precipitation extremes is even higher. It is clearly demonstrated in Table 1 where are presented mean values of the indices averaged over the 51 stations during 1957-2009 together with maximum values of single stations and of station means, and year numbers of corresponding maxima. The right column in Table 1 contains changes by trend. Table 1. Mean values of precipitation totals and indices of precipitation extremes averaged by 51 stations in Estonia during 1957–2009, their maximum values by station means and by single station (mm), year numbers of corresponding maxima and changes by trend (mm per decade). Statistically significant changes at p<0.05 level are typed in bold Year Winter Spring Summer Index PREC EWD SDII CWD R10mm R20mm RX1day RX5day R95p R99p PREC SDII CWD R10mm R20mm RX1day RX5day R95p R99p PREC SDII CWD R10mm R20mm RX1day RX5day R95p R99p PREC EWD SDII CWD R10mm R20mm RX1day RX5day R95p R99p Mean of stations 649 0.83 5.42 7.53 14.8 2.85 34.2 59.3 6.24 1.23 128 4.03 5.53 1.55 0.07 12.7 26.9 0.34 0.01 108 4.72 4.26 1.97 0.26 16.0 29.1 0.68 0.09 215 0.72 7.33 5.07 6.47 1.87 31.6 54.2 3.44 0.91 Maximum of Year of Year of stations' the Absolute the mean maximum maximum maximum 858 2008 1120 1981 4.7 1978 20 1978 6.28 1978 7.72 1997 9.82 1984 19 5 years 21.5 2001 35 2003 5.49 2008 12 1991 52.5 1987 131 1988 85.6 1987 184 1997 10.6 2008 19 2009 2.55 2008 7 2009 206 1999 320 1990 5.12 1993 7.32 1993 8.20 2007 16 3 years 4.55 1999 11 2 years 0.41 1990 4 2003 18.1 1989 41.3 1978 38.9 2003 80.4 1990 1.27 1999 6 2003 0.08 2004 1 16 years 176 1995 226 1995 6.56 1969 12.2 2005 6.24 1990 12 1986 4.31 1969 9 1983 1.04 1995 4 2 years 29.8 1995 65.4 1998 40.1 1996 88 1999 1.94 1969 5 1977 0.57 1995 3 1983 360 1998 508 1978 3.86 1978 20 1978 8.69 1986 17.5 1997 7.57 2005 15 2 years 11.4 1998 18 1981 3.94 1998 10 1998 49.0 1987 131 1988 81.3 1978 184 1997 6.59 1998 12 2 years 2.12 2008 6 3 years Trend 25.8 0.13 0.11 0.15 0.93 0.32 0.89 1.53 0.58 0.11 5.8 0.07 0.28 0.15 0.02 0.54 1.6 0.05 0.03 1.1 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.14 0.54 0.02 0.00 10.2 0.11 0.19 0.12 0.47 0.15 0.86 1.71 0.28 0.06 Autumn PREC EWD SDII CWD R10mm R20mm RX1day RX5day R95p R99p 196 0.11 5.54 6.25 4.81 0.65 21.1 43.1 1.78 0.21 268 0.8 7.05 9.04 8.76 1.41 27.7 57.4 3.49 0.63 1978 1978 2001 1978 2001 2008 1997 1997 2001 2005 380 10 9.41 19 16 7 78.4 141 9 3 1974 1987 2001 5 years 2 years 1991 2000 1985 2 years 6 years 5.1 0.01 0.12 0.02 0.02 0.09 0.75 1.88 0.14 0.03 Mean spatial distribution of annual precipitation PREC in Estonia is presented on Fig. 5. It varies between 535 mm (Kihnu Island) and 732 mm (Mauri, Haanja Upland in South-East Estonia) (Fig.5). Generally, lower annual precipitation is typical for coastal stations, also for the coast of Lakes Peipsi and Võrtsjärv. Higher precipitation revealed in continental Estonia on uplands and, especially, in the meridional zone parallel to the western coast on the distance of 20-100 km from the mean coastline. The rainiest seasons are summer and autumn while the driest is spring. There are remarkable differences in annual curve of precipitation between the coastal regions and the hinterland (Fig.6). The western Estonia is much drier in spring and in the first half of summer than the central and eastern Estonia. But in the second half of summer and especially in autumn the western Estonia receives much more precipitation. It can be explained by different thermal regimes of sea and land surfaces. In spring, sea surface is cold causing stable air stratification upon it, which prevents convective air uplift, formation of clouds and precipitation. Sea surface warms up during summer inducing unstable air stratification, convective ascending of air, formation of clouds and precipitation. Sea surface acts as a warmer surface throughout autumn and winter. The maximum of annual precipitation PREC varies between 1120 mm (Tahkuse, South-West Estonia in 1981) and 759 mm (Kihnu Island in 2001). Absolute maximum of the 12-month moving precipitation total in Estonia (1957-2009) was 1146 mm (Fig. 4). The year with the maximum precipitation amount over Estonia has been 2008 with the average of stations total 858 mm. More than 800 mm is observed also in 1981, 1978 and 1990. The rainiest year numbers are repeating many times in Table 1. Absolute maximum of summer precipitation has been 507.9 mm (1978, Praaga, East Estonia). The maximum of stations’ mean over 1953-2009 was 246.0 mm (Mauri) and the year with the wettest summer 1998 – mean of stations 360.1 mm. Maximum totals of precipitation for winter, spring, summer and autumn seasons were consequently 320.2 mm (1989/90; Kuusiku), 225.9 mm (1994/95, Tudu), 507.9 mm (1978, Praaga) and 380.3 mm (1974, Uue-Lõve). Absolute maximum of the 90-days precipitation calculated through the moving total over all days and stations in 53 years was 578.7 mm (Fig. 3). Fig. 5. Mean annual precipitation in Estonia during 1957-2009 using data of 51 meteorological stations 3.2. Indices of extremely high precipitation Precipitation extremes of Estonia are characterised using the number of extremely wet days (EWD). A day is estimated as extremely wet in case of the last day of a 10-day period when the precipitation total has been 100 mm or higher. Such periods has been observed in Estonia only in summer and autumn during 1957–2009, i.e. from June to November. The highest values are recorded in July and August (Fig. 7). The mean EWD per year was 0.83 (Table 1) while its monthly maximum 11 days was observed in south-eastern Estonia in July 1978 and in August 1987. Annual maximum of EWD (20 days) was observed at Praaga in 1978 with two wet periods – one in 12-22 July and the second in 10-18 August. Spatial distribution of EWD shows that the greatest danger for extremely wet periods is situated in south-eastern and northern Estonia (Fig. 8). Annual mean EWD varies highly at different stations. Its maximum was found in northern Estonia (Vanaküla, 1.79) and minimum in western Estonia (Sõrve, 0.13). Consequently, frequency of wet spells varies many times on the territory of Estonia. Generally, the same pattern as in case of EWD is typical also for the other indices of precipitation extremes. 90 VÕRU VILSANDI 80 precipitation, mm 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII months Fig. 6. Monthly mean precipitation in Vilsandi and Võru during 1957–2009 1,2% 90 EWD precipitation 80 1,0% 0,8% 60 50 0,6% 40 0,4% 30 precipitation, mm relative number of days 70 20 0,2% 10 0,0% 0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 Fig. 7. Monthly mean number of extremely wet days (EWD) and total precipitation (PREC) at the Estonian meteorological stations in 1957–2009 Fig. 8. Annual mean number of extremely wet days (EWD) Simple daily intensity index (SDII) indicates the mean precipitation amount per one wet day (≥1 mm). Its annual mean value was 5.4 mm. Lower values were observed in winter and spring, similar ones in autumn and much higher in summer (mean value 7.3 mm). SDII is spatially variable with higher intensity in the western part of the continental Estonia (Fig. 9). The absolute maximum 17.5 mm per wet day were recorded in Räpina in 1997. The year 1978 has been with the highest intensity of precipitation when mean SDII of the stations reached 6.3 mm/wet day. Fig. 9. Annual mean simple daily intensity index (SDII) Maximum number of consecutive wet days (≥1 mm) (CWD) has the highest mean value not in summer but in autumn, and the lowest in spring (Table 1). Annual maximum of CWD at stations varies between 10 and 19 days while it is higher in the hinterland and lower at the sea coast. Number of wet days is usually described by the number of heavy precipitation days R10mm (R≥10 mm) and R20mm (R≥20 mm). Their mean numbers were approximately 15 and 3 during the study period. Days with precipitation above 10 mm may occur in Estonia in every month. The number of very heavy precipitation days R20mm may also happen in Estonia in every month, but more often in July and August. The spatial pattern of R10mm is very representative to the patterns of mean precipitation as well as of the other indices of precipitation extremes (Fig. 10). Fig. 10. Annual mean number of days with heavy precipitation (R10mm) The absolute maximum of daily precipitation (RX1day) during the study period (130.8 mm) was measured in Võru on 3 July 1988, and of 5-day precipitation (RX5day) – 183.5 mm – in Räpina on 15-19 July 1997. The corresponding mean values of stations were 34.2 mm and 59.3 m (Table 1). The highest values of RX1day and RX5day have been observed in summer and lowest ones in winter and spring. RX1day maximum in 1957-2009 varies between the stations from 53 mm to 131 mm. The highest values were measured in south-east Estonia. RX5day varies between 85 and 184 mm and its spatial pattern is similar to the previous index. Numbers of days with the 95th and 99th percentile daily precipitation (R95p, R99p) are, of course, not high. In that sense the last year of the study period 2009 was very specific. Record high values were fixed at many stations. The mean R95p for all stations and all years was 6.24 days, and the mean R99p – 1.23 days. The spatial pattern of these indices was in a good concordance with mean spatial patter of Estonia. Their maximum values are concentrated in the rainy zone of the western Estonia. 3.3. Indices of drought in Estonia Spatial distribution of annual minimum precipitation in Estonia on Fig. 11 is quite variable but similar to the mean annual pattern (Fig. 5). The annual minimum is generally lower in the eastern Estonia than in its western part except the coastal zone. Absolute minimum value of annual precipitation – 335 mm – has been registered at Kunda, North Estonia, in 1964 (Table 2). Absolute minimum of 12-month moving precipitation total in Estonia was even 278 mm (Fig. 4). The year 1964 has been the driest during 1957–2009 with the minimum of mean annual precipitation over stations 453 mm. Minimum values of precipitation for winter, spring, summer and autumn seasons were 36 mm (1963/64, Võru); 16 mm (1964, Sõrve); 44 mm (1992, Rohuküla) and 54 mm (1988, Piigaste), consequently. Absolute minimum precipitation found from the moving 90-day totals of precipitation during the study period was only 1.4 mm (Fig. 3). Fig. 11. Minimum of annual precipitation in Estonia in 1957-2009 Table 2. Annual and seasonal mean minimum and absolute minimum precipitation and their trends in Estonia during 1957–2009. Statistically significant changes at p<0.05 level are typed in bold Year Winter Spring Summer Autumn Mean of stations 649 128 108 215 196 Minimum of stations' mean 453 66 50 118 116 Year of the maximum 1964 1964 1974 1983 1958 Absolute minimum 335 36 16 44 54 Year of the maximum 1964 1964 1964 1962 1988 Trend 18.1 5.50 0.06 5.83 3.80 Duration of extremely dry period in Estonia has been characterized through the number of extremely dry days (EDD). A day is estimated as extremely dry if it is the last day of a 20-day period without any precipitation. These days have occurred in Estonia at all months (Fig. 12). The period of maximum EDD is observed in August. A clear minimum in July is highly remarkable on Fig. 12. Hereby, it should be taken into account that EDD describes a dry period in advance. Therefore, the minimum in July implies on less frequent dry periods during midsummer between the second half of June and the first half of July. This is an interesting feature, which is not yet detected in other regions. 0,9% 90 precipitation, mm 80 0,7% 70 0,6% 60 0,5% 50 0,4% 40 0,3% 30 0,2% 20 0,1% 10 0,0% precipitation, mm relative number of days EDD 0,8% 0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 Fig. 12. Monthly mean relative number of extremely dry days (EDD divided by the total number of days in the months) and average monthly precipitation of Estonian meteorological stations in 1957–2009 The annual mean number of EDD during the study period was 1.2. The largest drought risk, i.e. the highest average number of EDD has been obtained for the north-western part of Estonian mainland with the mean value above 2 days (maximum 3.2 days in Rohuküla). The least number of dry days has been calculated for Jõhvi and Tartu (0.38, Fig. 13). The highest annual maximum of EDD was registered at Mauri in August and September 2002 – 30 days. The same year was extremely dry with the mean EDD over stations 12.6 days (Table 3). Fig. 13. Annual mean number of extremely dry days (EDD) Table 3. Mean values of drought indices averaged by 51 stations in Estonia during 1957–2009, their maximum values by station means and by single stations (mm), year numbers of the corresponding maxima and changes by trend (mm per decade). The rends are insignificant Year Winter Spring Summer Autumn Index EDD EDD1 XCDD CDD PDD DSMEA0 DSMEA1 EDD EDD1 XCDD CDD PDD DSMEA0 DSMEA1 EDD EDD1 XCDD CDD PDD DSMEA0 DSMEA1 EDD EDD1 XCDD CDD PDD DSMEA0 DSMEA1 EDD EDD1 XCDD CDD PDD DSMEA0 DSMEA1 Mean of stations 1.20 3.92 16.6 22.0 0.34 2.99 4.16 0.02 0.30 7.92 13.6 0.25 2.40 3.84 0.42 1.86 13.4 19.0 0.45 3.70 5.60 0.48 1.18 11.9 15.2 0.40 3.44 4.51 0.28 0.73 10.1 14.3 0.28 2.76 3.73 Maximum of stations' mean 12.6 22.3 29.9 39.6 0.46 4.19 5.40 0.20 1.04 14.3 24.9 0.37 3.36 6.11 3.31 13.3 20.5 39.5 0.65 6.93 13.1 10.1 13.9 23.47 24.4 0.61 6.45 7.82 3.31 7.24 20.5 34.6 0.51 4.18 6.17 Year of the maximum 2002 2002 2002 1972 1959 1959 1959 1983, 1984 1986 1984 1972 1996 1993 1970 2006 1972 2006 1972 1974 1974 1974 2002 2002 2002 1992 1997 2002 1969 1961 2002 1997 2002 1993 2005 1961 Absolute maximum 30 45 49 71 0.56 5.68 6.75 6 11 25 44 0.57 3.36 10.8 18 45 46 71 0.79 11.0 31.7 21 28 36 57 0.76 11.2 13.3 13 18 49 52 0.67 7 8.5 Year of the maximum 2002 1964 2002 1964 1959 1959 1996 1993 1993 1993 1987 1993 1993 1993 1972 1964 1964 1964 1974 1974 1974 2002 1994 2002 2008 1997 1959 1994 2002 1961,2000 2002 2002 1993 1993,1998 1998 Trend 0.09 0.19 0.17 0.22 0.00 0.03 -0.06 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.11 0.00 0.02 -0.07 0.00 0.00 -0.21 -0.19 0.00 0.01 -0.10 0.00 0.00 0.07 -0.19 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.28 -0.11 0.00 0.03 0.01 The spatio-temporal distribution of EDD is characterised by the fact that its maximum value in spring and summer have been observed in the coastal region of West Estonia but in autumn in the eastern Estonia. Maximum EDD in summer 21 days has occurred twice –in 1997 (Valga) and in 2002 (Rohuküla). In spring and in autumn drought risk has been lower. Maximum EDD in spring was 18 (Kuusiku in 1972 and Räpina in 2009) and in autumn 13 days, which was calculated for different stations, mostly in East Estonia (Lüganuse, Tudu, Tudulinna, Mauri) in 2000 and 2002. If we widened the limits of defining a dry day until the daily precipitation below 1 mm then, of course, the number of extremely dry days EDD1 increased significantly (Table 3). The mean annual EDD1 was 3.9 with the highest values in spring season. The maximum EDD 45 days was measured in Sõrve during the period ….. Numbers of consecutive dry days XCDD (R=0 mm) and CDD (R<1 mm) also describe a deficit of precipitation. Their mean values were 16.6 and 23.0 days, correspondingly. Average XCDD varied between 13.5 (Jõhvi) and 19.2 (Rohuküla). Among seasons, their highest values are typical for spring and the lowest for winter. Due to similar to EDD definition, the maximum number of consecutive dry days XCDD was also the highest in 2002 at Mauri station – 49 days (Table 3). Maximum number of consecutive dry days CDD – 71 – was recorded at the coastal station Heltermaa on Hiiumaa Island in February-April 1964. Average CDD have been 22 days with the highest values in spring. It varies from 20.5 (Mauri) till 26.1 days (Heltermaa). 2002 is also the year of highest average of CDD over stations. Annual variation (mean of stations) of CDD varies from 14.6 in1977 till 39.6 in 1972. The dry-day persistence PDD was 0.34 as a mean of 51 stations during 1957–2009. It means that a dry day will occur after a dry day in one third of cases. The probability of dry day was significantly higher in spring and lower in autumn (Table 3). Spatial differences are not large in Estonia but PDD has been mostly higher in dry coastal zone. The absolute maximum 0.79 was observed at Kasari in spring 1974. Mean dry spell durations DSMEA1 and DSMEA0 were 4.2 and 3.0 days. They are shorter than the average in autumn and winter and longer in spring and summer. The absolute maximum DSMEA1 was registered at Heltermaa in 1976. The spatial pattern of mean dry spell duration on Fig. 14 is similar to the patterns of other indices of drought in Estonia. The driest regions are located in the coastal zone (Vihterpalu, Kunda, Virtsu, Rohuküla, Sõrve, Kihnu). Fig. 14. Annual mean duration of the dry period (DSMEA0). 3.4. Long-term changes in precipitation extremes Trends are calculated using the Sen’s method and their significance is estimated by the MannKendall test. Trend values for spatial mean time series of the indices of precipitation extremes are presented in the last columns of Tables 1, 2 and 3 while statistically significant trends are marked in bold. Annual precipitation amount PREC has increased significantly in the majority of the Estonian stations during 1957–2009. The mean trend value averaged by the 51 stations was 25.8 mm per decade. This increase is statistically significant also in winter season (Fig. 15). In other seasons significant trends are observed only in some stations. The most remarkable increase in precipitation was found in north-eastern Estonia. The trend was weaker at the coastal stations. 1000 900 summer winter annual Linear (annual ) Linear (summer ) Linear (winter ) precipitation, mm 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 2008 2005 2002 1999 1996 1993 1990 1987 1984 1981 1978 1975 1972 1969 1966 1963 1960 1957 0 Fig. 15. Time series of annual and seasonal precipitation (mean of stations) in Estonia during 1957–2009 and their trend lines Generally, the indices of wet conditions (excl. CWD) have an increasing trend during 1957– 2009. It means that heavy rainfall has become more frequent and more intense. The indices of maximum precipitation have statistically significant increasing trends in all cases in winter but not at all in spring. There are trends in some indices and no trends in other ones in summer and autumn. Trends in both cases (summer and autumn) revealed for SDII and R95p, and no trends in both cases for PREC and CWD (Table 1). At the same time there are no any significant trends in indices of droughts (Table 2). Extremely wet or extremely dry conditions have been one of the main factors, which limit the agricultural production. They cause hydrological and socio-economical stress in Estonia. To find the total value of extreme days in a year and to estimate its long time changes we calculated the relative numbers of EWD and EDD in each year by dividing its mean value over stations to the average of 1957-2009. The relative number of extreme days, i.e. the sum of relative EWD and EDD has significantly increased (MK statistic 5.9) in Estonia during 1957–2009 (Fig.16). As a rule, extremely wet days prevail in some years and extremely dry days in other years. Extremely dry days dominated in 1957-1977 while the number of extremely wet days was on the highest level in 1978-1991. The wettest years were 1978 and 1987 when the mean of relative number of wet days was by 4-6 times higher than average of the study period. The number of dry days has substantially risen from the end of 20th century. The severest drought in 2002 with mean relative number of EDD (10 days) was observed in August and September. Relative values of EDD and EWD separately for each season show the most extreme dry or wet conditions in Estonia in 1957-2009 (Fig. 17). The highest number of extreme days has been observed in spring and summer of 2002 when extra dry conditions predominated. Existing of extremely wet and extremely dry conditions together in 1997, 1999, 2006 and 2008 show great spatial differences of precipitation regime over Estonia. 12 EDD EWD 10 extreme days /EWD+EDD) relative number of days Linear (extreme days /EWD+EDD) ) 8 6 4 2 2008 2005 2002 1999 1996 1993 1990 1987 1984 1981 1978 1975 1972 1969 1966 1963 1960 1957 0 Fig. 16. Relative number of annual number of extreme dry, extreme wet and extreme days in Estonia 1957-2009, and the trend line of the number of extreme days. 35 EDDwinter EDD spring EDD summer EDD autumn EWDsummer EWD autumn 30 25 20 15 10 5 Fig.17. Relative values of extreme dry and wet days in different seasons in 1957-2009. 4. Discussion and conclusions Acknowledgements 2009 2007 2005 2003 2001 1999 1997 1995 1993 1991 1989 1987 1985 1983 1981 1979 1977 1975 1973 1971 1969 1967 1965 1963 1961 1959 1957 0 This study has been supported by the grant No. 7510 of the Estonian Science Foundation and by the target financed project SF0180049s09 of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Estonia. References Achberger C, Chen D (2006) Trend of extreme precipitation in Sweden and Norway during 19642004. Research Report C72, Earth Science centre, Gothenburg University Alexandersson H (2002) Temperature and precipitation in Sweden 1860-2001. SMHI Meteorologi, 104 pp Alpert P, Ben-Gai T, Baharad A, Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D, Colacino M, Diodato L, Ramis C, Homar V, Romero R, Michaelides S, Manes A (2002) The paradoxical increase of Mediterranean extreme daily rainfall in spite of decrease in total values. Geophys Res Lett 29. doi:10.1029/2001GL013554 Avotniece Z, Rodinov V, Lizuma L, Briede A, Kļaviņš M (2010) Trends in the frequency of extreme climate events in Latvia. Baltica 23:135–148 BACC Author Team (2008) Assessment of climate change for the Baltic Sea basin. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 473 pp Balling RC, Goodrich GB (2010) Increasing drought in the American Southwest? A continental perspective using a spatial analytical evaluation of recent trends. Phys Geogr 31:293–306 Dai A, Trenberth KE, Qian T (2004) A global data set of Palmer Drought Severity Index for 1870– 2002: Relationship with soil moisture and effects of surface warming. J Hydrometeorol 5:1117– 1130 Førland EJ (2000) Trends in precipitation intensity in Norway and the Nordic region during the 20th century. ECAC2000: 3rd European Conference on Applied Climatology, 16-20 October 2000, Pisa, Italy. ISBN 88-900502-0-9 Frei C, Schär C (2001) Detection probability of trends in rare events: theory and application to heavy precipitation in the Alpine region. J Climate 14:1568–1584 Frich P, Alexander LV, Della-Marta P, Gleason B, Haylock M, Klein Tank AMG, Peterson T (2002) Observed coherent changes in climatic extremes during the second half of the twentieth century. Clim Res 19:193–212 Groisman PY, Knight RW, Easterling DR, Karl TR, Hegerl GC, Razuvaev VN (2005) Trends in intense precipitation in the climate record. J Climate 18:1326–1350 Groisman PY, Sherstyukov BG, Razuvaev VN, Knight RW, Enloe JG, Stroumentova NS, Whitfield PH, Førland E, Hannsen-Bauer I, Tuomenvirta H, Alexandersson H, Mescherskaya AV, Karl TR (2007) Potential forest fire danger over Northern Eurasia: Changes during the 20th century. Global Planet Change 56:371–386 Haylock MR, Goodess CM (2004) Interannual variability of European extreme winter rainfall and links with large-scale circulation. Int J Climatol 24:759–776 Heino R, Brázdil R, Førland EJ, Tuomenvirta H, Alexandersson H, Beninston M, Pfister C, Rebetez M, Rosenhagen G, Rösner S, Wibig J (1999) Progress in study of climatic extremes in Northern and Central Europe. Clim Change 42:151–181 Jaagus J (1992) Periodicity of precipitation in Estonia. Estonia. Man and Nature (Eds. T. Kaare et al). Estonian Geographical Society, Tallinn, 43-53 Jaagus J (1996) Climatic trends in Estonia during the period of instrumental observations and climate change scenarios. Estonia in the system of the global climate change. Institute of Ecology. Publication, 4:35–48 Jaagus J, (2006) Climatic changes in Estonia during the second half of the 20th century in relationship with changes in large-scale atmospheric circulation. Theor Appl Climatol 83:77–88 Jaagus J, Briede A, Rimkus E, Remm K (2010) Precipitation pattern in the Baltic countries under the influence of large-scale atmospheric circulation and local landscape factors. Int J Climatol 30:705–720 Jaagus J, Tarand A (1988) Territorial distribution of precipitation in Estonia. Yearbook of the Estonian Geographical Society 24:5-16 (in Estonian, summary in English) Karl RT, Knight RW (1998) Secular trends of precipitation amount, frequency, and intensity in the USA. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 79:231–241 Kažys J, Rimkus E, Bukantis A (2009) Heavy precipitation events in Lithuania in 1961–2008. Geografija 45(1):44–53 (in Lithuanian, summary in English) Keevallik S (2003) Changes in spring weather conditions and atmospheric circulation in Estonia (1955-95). Int J Climatol 23:263–270 Keevallik S, Post P, Tuulik J (1999) European circulation patterns and meteorological situation in Estonia. Theor Appl Climatol 63:117–127 Kiktev D, Sexton DMH, Alexander L, Folland C (2003) Comparison of modelled and observed trends in indices of daily climate extremes. J Climate 16:3560–3571 Kivi Klein Tank AMG, Können GP (2003) Trends in indices of daily temperature and precipitation extremes in Europe 1946-99. J Climate 16:3665–3680 Łupikasza E (2010) Spatial and temporal variability of extreme precipitation in Poland in the period 1951–2006. Int J Climatol 30:991–1007 Merilain M, Post P (2006) Heavy rainfall – is it only a feature of recent years’ summers in Estonia? Publ Geophys Univ Tartuensis 50:144–153 (in Estonian, summary in English) Moberg A, Jones PD (2005) Trends in indices for extremes in daily temperature and precipitation in central and western Europe, 1901-99. Int J Climatol. 25:1149–1171 Mätlik O, Post P (2008). Synoptic weather types that have caused heavy precipitation in Estonia in the period 1961-2005. Estonian Journal of Engineering 14:195–208 Osborn TJ, Hulme M, Jones PD, Basnett TA (2000) Observed trends in the daily intensity of United Kingdom precipitation. Int J Climatol 20:347–364 Päädam K, Post P (2011) Temporal variability of precipitation extremes in Estonia 1961–2008. Oceanologia 53:245–257 Remm K, Jaagus J, Briede A, Rimkus E, Kelviste T (2011) Interpolative mapping of mean precipitation in the Baltic countries using landscape characteristics. Est J Earth Sci 60:172–190 Rimkus E, Kažys J, Bukantis A, Krotovas A (2011) Temporal variation of extreme precipitation events in Lithuania. Oceanologia 53:259–277 Salmi T, Määttä A, Anttila P, Ruoho-Airola T, Amnell T (2002) Detecting trends of annual values of atmospheric pollutants by the Mann-Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimates – the Excel template application MAKESENS. Finnish Meteorol Inst Rep 31. Scaife AA, Folland CK, Alexander LV, Moberg A. Knight JR (2008) European climate extremes and the North Atlantic Oscillation. J Climate 21:72–83 Schmidli J, Frei C (2005) Trends of heavy precipitation and wet and dry spells in Switzerland during the 20th century. Int J Climatol 25:753–771 Sen Roy S, Balling RC (2004) Trends in extreme daily rainfall indices in India. Int J Climatol 24:457– 466 Stone DA, Weaver AJ, Zwiers FW (2000) Trends in Canadian precipitation intensity. Atmos Ocean 38:321–347 Tammets T (2007) Distribution of extreme wet and dry days in Estonia in last 50 years. Proc Estonian Acad Sci Eng 13:252–259 Tammets T (2010) Estimation of extreme wet and dry days through moving totals in precipitation time series and some possibilities for their consideration in agrometeorological studies. Agronomy Research 8:433–438 Valiukas D (2011) Dry periods in 1891-2010 in Vilnius. Geography 47(1):9–18 (in Lithuanian, summary in English) Wibig J (2009) Variability of daily precipitation totals in Poland (1951-2000). Geographia Polonica 82:21–32 Zhang X, Hogg WD, Mekis E (2001) Spatial and temporal characteristics of heavy precipitation events in Canada. J Climate 14:1923–1936 Zolina O, Simmer C, Kapala A, Bachner S, Gulev S, Maechel H (2008) Seasonally dependent changes of precipitation extremes over Germany since 1950 from a very dense observational network. J Geophys Res 113(D06110). doi:10.1029/2007JD008393 Zolina O, Simmer C, Belyaev K, Kapala A, Gulev S (2009) Improving estimates of heavy and extreme precipitation using daily records from European rain gauges. J Hydrometeorol, 10:701– 716 Zolina O, Simmer C, Gulev S, Kollet S (2010) Changing structure of European precipitation: longer wet periods leading to more abundant rainfalls. Geophys Res Lett 37(L06704). doi:10.1029/2010GL042468 Zolina OG (2011) Changes in the duration of synoptic rainy periods in Europe from 1950 to 2008 and their relation to extreme precipitation. Doklady Earth Sciences 436:690–695 Zou XK, Zhai PM, Zhang Q (2005) Variations in droughts over China: 1951–2003. Geophys Res Lett 32(L04707). doi:10.1029/2004GL021853