Induced nuclear transmutations
While the suspense in on regarding the choice of the country that will win the ITER project despite
the Cocoricos of the government and his communication net, we are tempted to ask us if that project
could not be a very big financial extortion of the international nuclear lobby that wants taxpayers to pay
more for the good living of an army of nuclear “scientists” whose unique preoccupation is to keep for
life their job and not to improve the scientific knowledge of our world.
As a matter of fact, Ancients have made a lot of observations, and probably they inherited some
knowledge. Numerous are the old books that talk about unusual process supposed to produce gold or
silver. With the benefit of time, we all would have understood the curiosity of the scientific community
in the checking of the saying of Ancients with the best equipments available in the scientific market in
order to know for sure if behind weird processes is not hidden a discrete nuclear property of matter.
Unfortunately those who had these costly scientific tools, for years, were the nuclear specialists who,
we should not to be surprised of that, have never be in excess of creativity and true scientific spirit,
may be because business or military program is the priority.
From the point of view of theory, I say that to understand the possibility of induced nuclear
transmutations, it is required to consider the involved energy, it means that all nuclear reaction may
occur if a minimum energy is available. Nuclear reactivity is not so different that the chemical
reactivity; for example a volume of chlorine and a volume of hydrogen placed in a flask, no react in
obscurity. Just put the flask to the light and reaction will start; light has brought that minimum
activation energy that initiated the chemical bounding of chlorine and hydrogen (put again in darkness
the flask if you want).
Equation of synergy of nuclear reactions
Considering the possibility of induced nuclear transmutations, we have to ask ourselves about the
energy source and the physics of these transmutations that produce a very high number of nuclei,
1018/s. Any natural system is never isolated: it may received two sorts of interactions, electromagnetic
and cosmic. Only the cosmic interaction may provide the sufficient energy to start nuclear reactions,
soft cosmic rays and for a lesser extend hard cosmic rays. To explain the very high number of
transmuted elements we have to admit that it necessarily exists a synergy of nuclear reactions similar
to that which is involved in the creation of the super heavy element (Z = 126) of the philosopher’s
stone of alchemists, I have named Trinitium (Tn), from uranium. In the case of the synthesis of
Trinitium, energy is released by uranium fission, it exists a probability that a fission fragment initiates
the formation of a Trinitium nucleus via a set of exoenergetic and endoenergetic nuclear reactions (pi),
and that the excited Trinitium nucleus newly created initiates an other set of nuclear reactions
conducing to other Trinitium nucleus, … with the probability (pj). So the equation of production of
Trinitium stabilized by fluorine is :
In the case of the natural transmutation induced by cosmic rays the path of thinking is similar. A
cosmic ray initiates the set of nuclear reactions to produce an excited nucleus that eventually starts
other set of nuclear reactions, … until required energy conditions are no more fulfilled. The equation of
production is now :
In both cases equations describe the formation of a macroscopic amount of nuclei synthesized or
transmuted via a synergy of nuclear reactions, they constitute, with the synergy concept, some of the
most interesting advances of my work about the rationalization of alchemy and reactions of spagyry.
The use of these equations
Both equations are an exact description of the transmutation phenomenon, they do not state anything
about the nature of atom. The strong advantage in describing the creation of elements in terms of
probabilities is that for each system we only have to precise the effective parameters that participate to
the reaction of transmutation. Therefore we note two key parameters, not including the source of
external or internal activation energy, which are the liquid state and the time; density or composition of
the medium has its importance, it strongly affects probabilities pi and pj. They are the same
parameters described by the French chemist Tiffereau hundred years ago.
Transmutation to silver from uraniferous mixt (2004)
During the processing of an old residue containing uranium, a stopped alchemy experiment, I
observed the creation of silver. I had melted the residue with sodium carbonate and potassium nitrate;
the fusion was around 1000°C and lasted 45 minutes. The grinding of the product showed the
presence of a metallic piece weighting 10.9 g, which appeared to be silver after analysis.
The gamma spectrum of the metal has been made with a CdTe detector: it presents two peaks, that
of Ag-109m and that of Pb-210 (starting from the left). The last peak is the sum of remaining peaks of
higher energy.
The presence of lead is not very surprising because lead and silver give an alloy; it is radiogenetical
lead .
The creation of silver may be explained by one of the equations, but the energy source, because of
the yield, is not the cosmic rays. It is germs of super heavy nuclei created in-situ during the alchemy
experiment. That fact has to be related with the genesis of native silver in nature: the metal is often
associated with pitchblende.
Transmutation silver to or via thermal change (from 1745)
The recipe has been tested in 1998, I have enough talked about it, so I give you the recipe as I found
it in an old book:
Take hot lime directly from the furnace (it is required to prepare lime from hard rock) put water
on it to get the strongest water you can; melt pure silver, & which is free of gold: & when it will
be melted, drop it in this lime water; having repeated the operation three to four times, treat
silver with nitric acid, you will find that a certain amount of gold has been produced.
Those who want to dispute the maturation of metals have to repeat the experiment, they have
to tell us where gold now joined with silver is coming from, I say that this fact convinces me
more than all their arguments. May be they will say that that gold is the result of melting silver
several times, but that cannot be proved nor by reason neither by experience; because I may
affirm you that as often you melt silver no change happens despite the contrary has been
claimed by Homberg, Kenkel, & and other Authors; but I suggest to who believe them to do
the experiment, that should quickly convince them that we may not get gold from pure silver,
from any number of melting. So I may assure that the experiment of silver with lime, is not only
curious, but very profitable; moreover it of course demonstrates the true in question.
On March 8, 2002 a physicist from CEA Cadarache, despite to have received the recipe wanted
me to do the experiment. He asked Biberian, university searcher and CEA interface for all matter
related with cold fusion, to be present. I was in charge to bring silver, oven, … to satisfy the curiosity
of both state scientists. The CEA kept the samples of silver, it was told me that may be they could
contain less than 1% gold, so to analyze it they had to wait for the state funds (sic) …
Biberian organizes the ICCF11 that will be held in Marseille (France) for one week starting on
October 31, 2004. But I observed that Cold Fusion is now Condensate Matter , that proves how you
may completely neutralize area of research changing names ; does exist a connection with the ITER
project of nuclear fusion ?
Transmutation of mercury to gold in acetic acid medium (ICCF9 – Roberto Mont)
An US chemist sent me the paper of Monti that was presented at ICCF9 in China. It is an interesting
paper that just presents the fact . According the chemist the yield may be improved, but the mercury
becomes quickly very thick.
The most important part of the paper in indicated below :
Consequently we divided in two parts our supply
of "treated Mercury".
We washed half of it (500g) with white wine
vinegar and the other 500g with a mixture (50%)
of white wine vinegar and Acetic Acid, for 2
months.
After 2 months we took 100g from the first 500g,
and 100g from the second 500g.
When dissolved in Nitric 1 to 5 the first 100g gave
13mg, the second 100g gave 55mg of Gold.
After two more months another 100g of Mercury
treated with the mixture of vinegar and Acetic
Acid, gave 88mg of Gold.
We have made Gold many times, in different
ways, but the Gold obtained directly from Mercury
in this way is the most beautiful we have ever
seen.
Just put in a jar at least 1 Kg of mercury, not ultra pure, and cover it with acetic acid. Let time do the
work and analyze mercury. The yield is around 1% , but the US chemist told me he got more.
Transmutation of mercury may be explained by the action of cosmic rays. Mercury is a good screen
for soft cosmic rays, that means they lost their energy in the mercury, then the labile hydrogen atom of
acetic acid may get fusion with excited mercury ( the barrier of potential is around 12.5 MeV)
Let suppose we may collide mercury with heat particle without loss (thermal isolation), after a while
all mercury will get the temperature of the beam of heat particle.
Cosmic rays have an energy around 2000 MeV, so the hypothetical scheme makes ourselves
understand that mercury will be enough excited after a while to produce transmutation via proton
absorption. Taking into account the frequency of cosmic rays, it is obvious that a synergy mechanism
is involved.
However we have to consider what Monti tells us :
We have observed that the "purified" Mercury gives very poor results because in the process
of "purification" some properties are lost (the Mercury goes in the wrong isomeric
configuration).
He also says that it is better to get mercury from roasted cinnabar (HgS). Taking into account that
gold may not be obtained from purified mercury, we may think that impurities have a higher reaction
cross-section for soft cosmic rays than mercury. Therefore, in order to justify the creation of mercury,
excited impurities necessarily transfer their energy to mercury.
We now may have a little thought for scientific method. Scientists seem to be in schizophrenic state :
for them transmutation of atoms is a reality only if a given atom, in that case mercury, is able with a
given reactive to produce other atom, in that case gold. The fact that pure mercury does not react to
produce gold means for them that the transmutation of mercury may not be possible. Our world is not
as pure as mercury used to claim no transmutation occurred, it means that all elements need each
other to product new thing. If we may see flowers on earth it is because they need bees or similar to
be reproduced otherwise they will not exist on Earth. A better spirit of synthesis should prevail among
scientists to avoid to escape the reality of our world, so the unique correct attitude is to be skeptical
and wise enough to study natural facts in a state as close as they used to be. In other words, increase
the size of the system under study.
To-day cold fusion research
We observe that most of the research works are about electrolysis that appears to be not so
Sulphurous than transmutation tied with old alchemy. Moreover, the work is minimum, cleaner than
old way chemistry; lasers, microwaves, … all the man made devices to disturb matter may be used, …
and so high tech measurement devices that make good science !
To know more about: I suggest you read the list of papers presented at ICCF10 in 2003 :
http://world.std.com/~mica/cftrefs.html
Albert CAU laboratory
http://albert.cau.free.fr/English/index.html