Regional Population

advertisement
Crop Wild Relative
Taxon Data Sheet1
COMPILER NAME(S):_____________________________________ Date:
This Assessment is [ ] a national/regional assessment
[ ] a global assessment
1. Taxonomy
1A. Scientific name
Authority:
Publication details:
1B. Synonyms:
Scientific synonym / ambiguities
1C.
Authority
Publication details
Scientific nomenclature:
FAMILY:
ORDER:
CLASS (& SUBCLASS):
1D. Common Names:
Name/synonym
Language
1E.Taxonomic level of assessment:
[ ] Species
[ ] Subspecies
[ ] Variety
[ ] Form
[ ] Population
1F.Life form:
____________________________________________
1G. Habit:
____________________________________________
1H. Breeding system:
____________________________________________
1J. Phenology:
____________________________________________
Notes:________________________________________________________________________________________
1
This taxon data sheet is adapted from the Conservation and Assessment and Management Plan (CAMP) Taxon Data Sheet
(TDS) developed by the Conservation Breeding Specialist Group (CBSG) of the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of IUCNThe World Conservation Union, and used in conjunction with the CBSG CAMP database. PGR Forum is grateful to the CBSG
for the use of the CAMP database and TDS.
PGR Forum, 29 July 2003 (Adapted from the CBSG CAMP Taxon Data Sheet)
1
2. Habitat and current distribution
Habitat(s) (See Habitats Authority File)
Comments
2A. Habitat:
Habitat:
Habitat:
2B. Specific habitat niche: ___________________________________________________________________________
2C. Altitudinal range (m): ___________________________________________________________________________
2D. Current known distribution:
Notes:
2a. Country(ies) of this assessment
Country
Indigenous?
Endemic?
Introduced?
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
3. Approximate Extent of Occurrence of the taxon
(Extent of occurrence is defined as the area contained within the shortest continuous imaginary boundary
encompassing all known, inferred or projected sites of present occurrence of the taxon)
Occurrence area:
[ ] < 100 sq km [ ] 101-5,000 sq km [ ] 5,001 – 20,000 sq km [ ] >20,000 sq km
Notes (Occurrence)
4. Approximate Area of Occupancy of the taxon
(Area of occupancy is defined as the area occupied by the taxon within the 'extent of occurrence')
Area of Occupancy:
[ ] < 10 sq km [ ] 11-500 sq km [ ] 501 – 2,000 sq km [ ] >2,001 sq km
Notes (Occupancy):
5. No. of locations or subpopulations in which the taxon is distributed:_________
Is there a continuous decline in no. of subpopulations / locations?
[ ] Yes
Are there extreme fluctuations in no. of subpopulations/ locations?
[ ] Yes
Percentage of population that occurs in most important subarea: __________
Most important subarea:
Size of Population:__________ Size of Subarea:__________ sq. km.
Notes (subpopns) _
PGR Forum, 29 July 2003 (Adapted from the CBSG CAMP Taxon Data Sheet)
[ ] No
[ ] No
2
5b. Specific description of major subpopulations and subareas
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Area Size:_____Km2 Latitude ________ Longitude _______ Geographic Location:
Population size (no. of individuals) (best est:)_________ High:______ Low:______Habitat:
States or
Provinces:
Sources:
Notes:
Localities or
Districts:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Area Size:_____Km2 Latitude ________ Longitude _______ Geographic Location:
Population size (no. of individuals) (best est:)_________ High:______ Low:______Habitat:
States or
Provinces:
Sources:
Notes:
Localities or
Districts:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Area Size:_____Km2 Latitude ________ Longitude _______ Geographic Location:
Population size (no. of individuals) (best est:)_________ High:______ Low:______Habitat:
States or
Provinces:
Sources:
Notes:
Localities or
Districts:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Area Size:_____Km2 Latitude ________ Longitude _______ Geographic Location:
Population size (no. of individuals) (best est:)_________ High:______ Low:______Habitat:
States or
Provinces:
Sources:
Notes:
Localities or
Districts:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Area Size:_____Km2 Latitude ________ Longitude _______ Geographic Location:
Population size (no. of individuals) (best est:)_________ High:______ Low:______Habitat:
States or
Provinces:
Sources:
Notes:
Localities or
Districts:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Area Size:_____Km2 Latitude ________ Longitude _______ Geographic Location:
Population size (no. of individuals) (best est:)_________ High:______ Low:______Habitat:
States or
Provinces:
Sources:
Notes:
Localities or
Districts:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(Copy and paste fields to record additional subpopulations)
PGR Forum, 29 July 2003 (Adapted from the CBSG CAMP Taxon Data Sheet)
3
6. Habitat status:
[ ] Contiguous [ ] Fragmented [ ] Not known
6A. Is there any change in the habitat where the taxon occurs? [ ] Yes [ ] No
If yes, [ ] Decrease in area [ ] Increase in area [ ] Stable in area [ ] Unknown
6B. If decreasing, what has been the decrease in Habitat area?
approximate change
[]
[]
[]
[]
Less than 20 %
21 - 50 %
51 - 80 %
>80 %
over how many years: ______Years
6C. If stable or unknown, do you predict a decline in habitat?
Approximate change
[]
[]
[]
[]
Less than 20 %
21 - 50 %
51 - 80 %
> 80 %
for how many years: ______Years
6D. State primary cause of change:
6E. Is there any change in the quality of the habitat where the taxon occurs? [ ] Yes [ ] No
6E If yes, Describe:
[]
[]
[]
[]
Decrease in Quality
Increase in Quality
Stable
Unknown
Notes on Quality change:
6F. General Notes on Habitat:
7. Threats (Refer to Threats Authority File) (Indicate Rank and check boxes as needed)
Present Future Led to
Rank Effect? Effect? decline in popn?
1. Habitat Loss (Human Induced)
_________________
_________________
| |
| |
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
| |
| |
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
| |
| |
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
| |
| |
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
| |
| |
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Notes
2. Alien Species
_________________
_________________
3. Harvest/Exploitation
_________________
_________________
4-5. Accidental
_________________
_________________
6-10. Other threats
_________________
_________________
Comment on Threats:
PGR Forum, 29 July 2003 (Adapted from the CBSG CAMP Taxon Data Sheet)
4
8. Utilisation:
8A. Is the taxon utilised?
[ ]Yes
Type of use:
[ ] Local
[ ] National
[ ] Commercial
[ ] International
8B. Parts used: (See parts list)
Purpose
Parts
____________
____________
____________
____________
Wild collected?
___________
___________
___________
___________
Cultivated?
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Comments:_______________________________________________________
Parts List
Whole plants
Flowers
Seeds
Roots
Tubers/Rhizomes
Gene donor
_______________________________________________________
8C.How does utilisation effect the population?
__________
__________
8D. Does the taxon have utilisation potential? (Please state potential use)
9-10. Overall population numbers and trends
Total
9. Size of Population (this assessment):
________
10A. Recent past trends:
[ ] Declining
[ ] Increasing
[ ] Stable
[ ] Unknown
10B. Rate of decline (past)
______%
For how many years
____years
10C. Will population decline (future)?
[ ] yes [ ] no
Predicted decline rate
_________%
Prediction period
_____years
__________
Mature individuals (best estimate)
________
[ ] Declining
[ ] Increasing
[ ] Stable
[ ] Unknown
________%
____years
[ ] yes [ ] no
_________%
_____years
Notes:
11. Overall population data quality
Qualifiers: [ ] Observed
[ ] Inferred
[ ] Suspected
[ ]Estimated
[ ]Projected
Uncertainty [ ]95% confidence [ ]Minimum/Maximum value [ ]Range of Opinion [ ] Evidentiary
[ ] Precautionary [ ]Subjective [ ]Hypothetical [ ]Point estimate
[ ] Range estimate
Estimates base on:
[ ] Census or monitoring
[ ] Indirect information
[ ] Field study
[ ] Informal sightings
[ ] Herbarium records [ ] Literature
[ ] Hearsay/belief
Notes on Data Quality:
12. Recent field studies
Researcher names, location, dates, topics:
PGR Forum, 29 July 2003 (Adapted from the CBSG CAMP Taxon Data Sheet)
5
13. Status (Red List)
13A. Current status: Year: _______
Status
Criteria
Red List Version
Date of Assessment
Global: ________________________ ____________________ ______________
________________
National: _______________________ ____________________ ______________
________________
13B. CITES:
13C. Natl wildlife Legislation:
13D. Natl Red Data Book:
13E. Intl Red Data Book:
13F. Other legislation:
13G. Protected area presence:
13H. Endorsed protection plan:
13I. New (revised) status (if applicable):
Status
Criteria
Red List Version
Date of Assessment
Global: ________________________ ____________________ ______________
National: _______________________ ____________________ ______________
Notes:_____________________________________________________________________________________
13.1
If Regional Assessment, Global/Regional Population Interactions:
Global population:
a. Estimated global population:
Estimated regional population
a. Regional population as a percent of global population:
%
b. Has global population decreased in recent years?
[ ] Yes
If yes, has decreased ____% over ____ years
c. Will global population decrease in future years?
[ ] Yes
If yes, will decrease ____% over ____ years
Regional Population
a. Is the regional population isolated?
[ ] Yes
b. Is there migration between regional and neighboring populations?
[ ] Yes
c. Is Regional population enhanced by in-migration?
[ ] Yes
d. Is Regional population stabilized by in-migration?
[ ] Yes
e. Is Regional population a sink?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
[ ] No
If the IUCN Red List assignment for the regional/national population was upgraded or downgraded due to the
influence of neighbouring populations shown above, list both original and adjusted categories and give an
explanation for the adjustment made.
Original Category: _______________________ Adjusted Category:
Explanation for adjustment:
14. Supporting Research Is research recommended for taxon?
[ ] Yes
Specify:
[ ] Genetic research
[ ] Taxonomic research
[ ] Survey studies
[ ] Utilisation
14A. Is Population and Habitat Viability Assessment recommended?
Notes:
PGR Forum, 29 July 2003 (Adapted from the CBSG CAMP Taxon Data Sheet)
[ ] Demography/life history
[ ] Yes [ ] No
6
15. Management recommendations for the taxon
Conservation Actions (See Conservation Actions Authority file)
Needed
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
In Place
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
[ ] Yes
Specific Management Recommendations
[ ] Habitat management
[ ] Sustainable utilisation
[ ] Ex situ conservation
[ ] Wild popn. management
[ ] Monitoring
[ ] Education/awareness
[ ] Gene banking
[ ] Local community participation
[ ] Reintroduction
Notes:
16. Ex situ conservation recommendations
[ ] Species recovery
[ ] Research
If ex situ conservation recommended in Q15, is it for:
[ ] Education
[ ] Sustainable use
[ ] Reintroduction
[ ] Gene banking
Notes:
17. Do ex situ accessions already exist?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
17A. Names of facilities:
17B. No. of accessions:
____
_____
_____
_____
_____
17C. Does a coordinated species management program exist for this species?
If yes, specify
[ ] Yes
17D. Is a coordinated Species Management Program recommended for range country(ies)?
If yes, specify
[ ] Yes
18. Level of ex situ conservation recommended
[]
Initiate ex situ program in 3 years
[]
Initiate ex situ program within 3 years
[]
No ex situ program recommended
[]
Ongoing ex situ program decreased
[]
Ongoing ex situ program intensified or increased
[]
Pending recommendations of PHVA workshop
19. Are techniques established to propagate the taxon?
[]
Techniques known for this taxon or similar taxon
[]
Some techniques known for taxon or similar taxon
[]
Techniques not known at all
[]
Information not available with this group
PGR Forum, 29 July 2003 (Adapted from the CBSG CAMP Taxon Data Sheet)
7
20. Other Comments
21. Sources: (Bibliography) Specify author(s), year, title, organization, agency, journal, or publisher
22a. Contributors (contributed data and information on this species)
22b. Assessors (those who deduced threat level)
PGR Forum, 29 July 2003 (Adapted from the CBSG CAMP Taxon Data Sheet)
8
Download