REVIEW TEMPLATE
(NB the suggested word limits for each section of the self evaluation are advisory and
at their fullest extent reflect what may be appropriate for large scale/complex
provision across a range of sub disciplines. Although some cross disciplinary
submissions may need to exceed the template word limit suggestions it may be
possible to evaluate a relatively small programme portfolio in about 2500-3000
words)
Faculty:
Subject Area for Review:
Date of Review:
1.
Introduction:
This section should include information on the range of provision and the Faculty
context.
Type text in box – Box will expand to accommodate text (Up to 300 words)
QES 12-Feb-16
Page 1 of 11
2.
Academic Standards:
Review judgements about academic standards will be made on the appropriateness
of the intended learning outcomes in relation to subject benchmark statements,
qualification levels and the overall aims of the provision, on the effectiveness of
curricular content and assessment arrangements in relation to the intended learning
outcomes and on actual student achievement.
2.1. Aims and Learning Outcomes
This section should be used to reflect on programme aims and learning outcomes
commentary should cover:
 The appropriateness of programme aims and how they relate to Faculty and
University aims and objectives.
 How the learning outcomes support the aims of the programme(s).
 How learning outcomes relate to external reference points including relevant
subject benchmarks, the qualifications framework and any professional body
requirements.
Type text in box – Box will expand to accommodate text (300-700 words)
QES 12-Feb-16
Page 2 of 11
2.2. Curricula
Use this section to indicate:
 How the curriculum content, design and organisation support students in
achieving intended learning outcomes in terms of knowledge and
understanding, cognitive skills, subject specific skills (including practical and
professional skills) transferable skills, progression to employment and/or further
study, and personal development.
 How curriculum content and design are informed by recent developments in
teaching and learning, research and scholarship and professional requirements
Type text in box – Box will expand to accommodate text (300-700 words)
QES 12-Feb-16
Page 3 of 11
2.3. Assessment
The section is about evaluation of the assessment process and the standards it
demonstrates.
Please comment on:
 How assessment supports the demonstration of the achievement of learning
outcomes
 How assessment criteria distinguish between different levels of achievement
 The adequacy of formative assessment
 The adequacy of standards of achievement in relation to external reference
points including relevant aspects of the QAA’s academic infrastructure and
professional requirements
Type text in box – Box will expand to accommodate text (300-700 words)
QES 12-Feb-16
Page 4 of 11
3.
Quality of Learning Opportunities:
Judgements about the quality of learning opportunities will be made on the
effectiveness of the teaching and learning opportunities provided; on the
effectiveness of the use of learning resources (including staff resources) and on the
effectiveness of the support provided to students to enable them to progress within
the programme.
3.1. Teaching and Learning
Please comment on:
 The quality of teaching materials and the effectiveness of the range of teaching
methods teaching in relation to curriculum content and programme aims
 How effectively staff draw on their research, scholarship and /or professional
activity to inform their teaching
 How engagement and participation by students is facilitated. Is this effective?
Type text in box – Box will expand to accommodate text (300-700 words)
QES 12-Feb-16
Page 5 of 11
3.2. Student Progression
Please comment on:
 The effectiveness of arrangements for admissions and induction
 The effectiveness of academic support including written academic guidance,
feedback tutorial support and supervisory arrangements
 Cohort and /or statistics which provide demographic data and indicate numbers,
progression, retention and achievement.
Type text in box – Box will expand to accommodate text (300-700 words)
QES 12-Feb-16
Page 6 of 11
3.3. Learning Resources
Please comment on:
 The collective expertise of the academic staff, their suitability and availability for
effective delivery of the curricula
 The appropriateness of technical and administrative support
 How staff development supports programme delivery
 Strategy for the employment of learning resources, the suitability of teaching
and learning accommodation, the appropriateness of book and periodical stocks
and the availability of suitable equipment and IT facilities
Type text in box – Box will expand to accommodate text (300-700 words)
QES 12-Feb-16
Page 7 of 11
4.
The Maintenance and Enhancement of Standards and
Quality:
Please comment on:
 How the programme area and the Faculty review and seek to maintain and
enhance standards; including reference to use made of External Examiner
reports.
Type text in box – Box will expand to accommodate text (Up to 500 words)
QES 12-Feb-16
Page 8 of 11
5.
Thematic Enquiry: Student Employability
Reviews include a thematic element which reflects current institutional review
themes identified by the QAA. For 2015-16 the theme is Student Employability.
For review the following broad aspects need to be addressed:
Please comment on:
 Innovations in promoting the employability of students
 How employers are involved in the delivery and development of the curriculum
The following questions are prompts to guide responses to the above:
1. What steps does the award (or group of awards or subject area) take to enable
students develop relevant employability skills?
2. What use does the team make of work- based and/or placement learning
initiatives and opportunities to develop employability skills?
3. Comment on your first destination leaver statistics (and/or other related
surveys). How does the award team use this analysis to enhance learning
opportunities?
4. Have you made your students aware of any central employability initiatives (for
example, Staffordshire Graduate, Careers Fairs)?
5. What employer groups /professional bodies are you working with in the
development, design, assessment and review of your award provision?
6. What comments have you from your alumni, in terms of preparing students for
employment and/or enhancement to employability?
Type text in box – Box will expand to accommodate text (Up to 500 words)
QES 12-Feb-16
Page 9 of 11
6.
Collaborative Arrangements:
(Where relevant please complete this section)
Please comment on:
 Administrative communication between the University and partner organisation.
 The support provided by the University, including staff development.
 Liaison between the University and partner organisation personnel.
 Awareness of Staffordshire University policies, procedures and regulations and
the extent to which the programme is delivered in accordance with these
requirements.
 The handling of, and follow-up to, any complaints or difficulties encountered
during the delivery of the programme.
Type text in box – Box will expand to accommodate text (Up to 500 words)
QES 12-Feb-16
Page 10 of 11
7.
Current and Future Challenges and Developments:
Please summarise the key strengths of the current programme(s) and the action
taken to address current weaknesses and comment on future challenges and
opportunities for development.
If not already covered please explain the strategy to address current enhancement
themes such as widening participation and inclusivity, employability, enterprise and
entrepreneurship and internationalisation.
Type text in box – Box will expand to accommodate text (Up to 500 words)
QES 12-Feb-16
Page 11 of 11