RURAL AREA DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 7TH FEBRUARY 2007 REFERENCE DC/061329/FUL LOCATION EXPIRES 29/01/07 3 Three Marsh Lane APPLICATION TYPE Full Planning Permission Reydon APPLICANT Mr and Mrs Souster Southwold PARISH Reydon Suffolk IP18 6NP PROPOSAL Construction of a side and rear extension, roof conversion and new rear balcony. SUMMARY The application site is situated within the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty on Three Marsh Lane in Reydon; the site comprises a brick built bungalow on a large site with similar properties surrounding it. PARISH COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS Awaiting comment. NEIGHBOURS 7 consulted – 4 objections. Weatherboarding would be out of character with properties in the area. Windows facing No.1 would lead to a loss of privacy. Balcony would overlook properties to the rear and to the side. Loss of privacy and seclusion. PLANNING HISTORY None. PLANNING POLICY Waveney Adopted Local Plan (adopted November 1996) ENV1 – Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty and Heritage Coast H18 – Extensions to dwellings Interim Waveney Local Plan (May 2004) ENV1 – National need for Development in AONB and Heritage Coast DC1 – Neighbour Amenity DC2 – Design H17 – Extensions to dwellings PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS The proposed extension would generally improve the appearance of the property from the streetscene with the inclusion of a pitched roof over the existing flat roof garage. Although weatherboarding is not evident on properties in the immediately area, there are houses in the surrounding area which are clad in weatherboarding. Therefore the impact on the appearance of the surrounding area would be negligible. The side extension is 1.4 metres lower than the ridge height of the bungalow, although it would be closer to the boundary of the site than the existing bungalow it would not have an impact on the light or outlook available to the properties on Gorse Lane. There are two roof lights proposed within the roof space of the side extension; these are at level, which would not provide an opportunity for over looking. The proposed rear balcony would allow limited views; the properties on Gorse Lane would be blocked from sight by the side extension; to the west there would be a view of the side of number 5 Three Marsh Lane; although this elevation does contain some windows they are to non-habitable rooms. The gardens to the rear are over 20 metres from the proposed balcony and the properties are between 30 and 50 metres from the proposed balcony, so there would be minimal impact on these properties. RECOMMENDATIONS Approve. BACKGROUND PAPERS CONTACT Case File DC/06/1329/FUL held in Planning Office, Mariners Street, Lowestoft Iain Robertson, Area Planning Officer, Development Control, 01502 523067