Vectors Intentional/Unintentional Suppliers Intentional Initial categories and coding from scoping interviews Knowledge Leakage Project Positive Learning about opportunities in emerging markets through outsourcing to other countries Intentionally collaborate/outsource with partners who have complementary skills/competencies Do not subcontract anything that bears critical knowledge (core competence viewpoint) Outsource repetitive and standardized components Market intelligence (learning from information provided by suppliers into market intelligence) Intentionally create a strategic alliance/partnership with the supply chain Negative Subcontract elements to suppliers who can imitate your business model Market intelligence (divulging too much information from your company for the suppliers to imitate your business model) ‘Need to know’ basis for suppliers Bidding process Page 1 of 18 Vectors Intentional/Unintentional Suppliers (Continued) Intentional (Continued) Initial categories and coding from scoping interviews Knowledge Leakage Project Positive Intentionally putting knowledge in the public domain (e.g. through networks) ‘Need to know’ basis for suppliers Negative Subcontract elements to suppliers who can imitate your business model Market intelligence (divulging too much information from your company for the suppliers to imitate your business model) Empowering the suppliers to own the problem ‘Need to know’ basis for suppliers Bidding process Bidding process Full traceability Page 2 of 18 Vectors Intentional/Unintentional Positive Negative Suppliers (Continued) Unintentional Opportunities in emerging markets through outsourcing to other countries If outsourcing is primarily driven by resource availability, as opposed to strategic decision Market intelligence Suppliers leaving (e.g. through bankruptcy) Supply chain clustering Bidding process Unintentionally putting knowledge in the public domain (e.g. through networs) Knowledge leakage through change of ownership of supplier (especially if it becomes owned by a competitor) Bidding process Cultural differences that impede communication between your company and the supply chain Initial categories and coding from scoping interviews Knowledge Leakage Project Page 3 of 18 Vectors Intentional/Unintentional Customers Intentional Positive Negative Crafting business propositions with customers Customers leaving for a competitor (or just leaving the sector) Market intelligence from customers Customers acting as a conduit of knowledge between competitors Learning from customers Sample contracts and nondisclosure agreements Customer Relationship Management system Repeat business (repetitive process and re-use of leaked knowledge) Inquiry process to translate the clients’ requirements Initial categories and coding from scoping interviews Knowledge Leakage Project Page 4 of 18 Vectors Intentional/Unintentional Positive Negative Customers (Continued) Unintentional Learning from customers Too many middle men between customer and the service provider (Chinese whispers) Cultural differences that impede communication between your company and customers Initial categories and coding from scoping interviews Knowledge Leakage Project Page 5 of 18 Vectors Competitors Intentional/Unintentional Intentional Unintentional Initial categories and coding from scoping interviews Knowledge Leakage Project Positive Negative Intentionally split waste material so that this does not get picked up by other companies and replicated Clustering of competitors Strategic misinformation to competitors Market intelligence (learning from other companies) ‘Give and take’ attitude towards other companies ‘Give and take’ attitude towards other companies Outright theft Market intelligence (other companies learning from you) Unintentional leakage of knowledge to competitors through suppliers and customers (e.g. in the bidding process) Page 6 of 18 Vectors Intentional/Unintentional People Intentional Positive Training and development (attending external courses; or bringing back training ideas from outside) Involvement and participation strategies to make people feel they own the direction of the company strategy – knowledge sharing and culture Negative Holidays and maternity leave – people outflow (temporary) Temporary workers – People inflow and outflow Knowledge Transfer Partnerships with Universities and involvement in courses to build up future capacity Gain people from competitors or other organizations – people inflow Intentional development of multi-disciplinary team (or multi-skill team) to ensure learning between disciplines/professions/other skills sets Initial categories and coding from scoping interviews Knowledge Leakage Project Page 7 of 18 Vectors Intentional/Unintentional People (Continued) Unintentional Initial categories and coding from scoping interviews Knowledge Leakage Project Positive Negative Experts leaving the organization (particularly if the critical knowledge is held in a key individual) – People outflow Sickness – people outflow Page 8 of 18 Vectors Intentional/Unintentional Internal/ external Intentional Unintentional Initial categories and coding from scoping interviews Knowledge Leakage Project Positive Adequacy of diffusing knowledge from external source to different parts of the organisation Intentional top-down communication of organisational strategy Negative Dependency on electronic systems (in particular when systems fail completely and knowledge is lost completely) Use of electronic systems Lack of managing employees’ knowledge or inadequacy of ‘knowledge manager’ Page 9 of 18 Vectors Intentional/Unintentional IPRs/Trust Intentional Positive Lack of assessing nature of knowledge formally (choice to protect knowledge based on gut feeling) –could be positive and negative (unknown) Negative Lack of assessing nature of knowledge formally (choice to protect knowledge based on gut feeling) –could be positive and negative (unknown) Published papers and specialist materials Unintentional Initial categories and coding from scoping interviews Knowledge Leakage Project Published papers and specialist materials Page 10 of 18 Appendix A: Preventive measures against negative knowledge leakage Succession planning/handover planning Quality management system Capture knowledge before people retire Standardisation of practices Project team organisations Traceability of suppliers Hard copies documentation of drawings Putting knowledge capture procedures in place No external access to system – no CD Drive Library of past projects Legal firewall from commercial activities Emails Minutes Knowledge-based engineering systems (KBE) 3-tier computer system ( 1 on lab; 1 copy tad stream copy and 1 copy hard copy) Collaborative teams reduce company cost of research and development Protection via patents, copyright (legal stuff) Patent critical knowledge Making sure IPR ownership is agreed with customer Initial categories and coding from scoping interviews Knowledge Leakage Project Page 11 of 18 Appendix B: Deeper explanation of codes Suppliers 1. Intentionally learn about opportunities in emerging market 2. Intentionally collaborate/outsource with partners who have complementary skills/competencies a. Suppliers only collaborate with complementary but not competitive disciplines b. Suppliers have complementary skills – compliance (Poland, China, Egypt); outsource not because of cost advantage but to ensure equally high valueadded c. Unintentionally if resourcing is the key driver for outsourcing 3. Do not subcontract anything that bears critical knowledge (core competence viewpoint) a. Do not subcontract anything critical b. Do not outsource to UK contractors for fear of competition 4. Outsource repetitive and standardized components a. Off the shelf versus bespoke b. Outsourcing production information that is repetitive and standardized components to India 5. Market intelligence (learning from information provided by suppliers into market intelligence) a. Not releasing information because they want to remain commercial b. Suppliers using intelligence to enhance standing with other clients c. Market intelligence (institutional) 6. Intentionally create a strategic alliance/partnership with the supply chain a. Changing culture from arms’ length to partnership b. Outsourcing as more of a partnership (or strategic alliance) 7. Suppliers leaving (e.g. through bankruptcy) a. Suppliers leaving, going bankrupt b. Viability of suppliers 8. Supply chain clustering a. Knowledge leakage within and across suppliers, major suppliers already in partnership 9. Intentionally putting knowledge in the public domain (e.g. through networks) 10. ‘Need to know’ basis for suppliers a. Giving too much information to suppliers (too many changes) b. ‘Need to know’ basis c. Intentionally withholding knowledge 11. Empowering the suppliers to own the problem 12. Knowledge leakage through change of ownership of supplier (especially if it becomes owned by a competitor) 13. Bidding process a. Bidding process b. Supplier driven innovation (new blueberries) 14. Full traceability 15. Cultural differences that impede communication between your company and the supply chain a. Personality clash b. Language barriers c. Miscommunication or discontinuity Initial categories and coding from scoping interviews Knowledge Leakage Project Page 12 of 18 Customers 1. Crafting business propositions with customers a. Educate client and manage their expectations b. Shaping of briefs to the mutual satisfaction 2. Customers leaving for a competitor (or just leaving the sector) a. Biggest risk is customers walking away due to non-aligning of thinking b. Surgeon to bankrupt (unable to buy) 3. Too many middle men between customer and the service provider (Chinese whispers) 4. Market intelligence from customers 5. Learning from customers a. Intensive information sharing from customers (technical, product and scientific) – ‘need to know’ basis b. Learning from customers at the beginning; not as much as time goes on as expertise grows c. Learning from clients on their business d. Learning from customers on procedural knowledge 6. Sample contracts and non-disclosure agreements 7. Customer Relationship Management system (CRM) 8. Repeat business (repetitive process and re-use of leaked knowledge) 9. Customers acting as a conduit of knowledge between competitors a. Customers act as a conduit of knowledge between competitors (bidding process) b. Development work where product is not commissioned but does get made by other suppliers (i.e. competitors) c. Withholding information from customers to maintain competitiveness 10. Inquiry process to translate the clients’ requirements 11. Cultural differences that impede communication between your company and customers a. Misinterpretation of customer requirements, cultural and language differences b. Customers in Europe and the US – cultural difference Competitors 1. ‘Give and take’ attitude towards other companies 2. Intentionally split waste material so that this does not get picked up by other companies and replicated 3. Clustering of competitors a. Leaking to agree strategy, direction, standards to an extent (contextual; perhaps very relevant to oligopolistic situations) b. Partnering into clusters – free-riders 4. Strategic misinformation to competitors 5. Market intelligence (learning from other companies) 6. Unintentional leakage of knowledge to competitors through suppliers and customers (e.g. in the bidding process) a. Knowledge lost through joint suppliers b. Suppliers sharing knowledge with direct competitor c. Supplier may leak information to competitor d. Client may leak information to competitor e. Leakage through suppliers in bidding process 7. Outright theft a. Outright theft Initial categories and coding from scoping interviews Knowledge Leakage Project Page 13 of 18 b. Hacking into computer systems People 1. Experts leaving the organization (particularly if the critical knowledge is held in a key individual) – People outflow a. Dependency on past experience hampered by outflow of people b. Loss of experts to maintain old technical systems c. CEO leaving d. Know-how may be leaked to another organization e. Loss of people know-ho f. Loss of 33 years experience through retirement g. External contractors (IT consultant0 leaving knowledge hole where people are paid to fill h. Lose people to competitors and other organizations who take knowledge with them and leak knowledge to others i. People leaving employment through retirement j. Personnel leaving for competitors k. Key personnel with unique knowledge that cannot be turned to organizational knowledge l. Loss of employees’ contacts (via which they can access additional knowledge) m. Dependency on key employees n. Criticality dependent on who leaves o. Dependency on individual’s contacts 2. Gain people from competitors or other organizations – people inflow a. Recruitment from customers b. Recruitment from competitors, suppliers and customers for their knowledge assets c. Gain people from competitors and other organisations with know-how d. Inflow of knowledge employees coming in from direct competitor e. New people from competitors, suppliers and customers 3. Holidays and maternity leave – people outflow (temporary) a. Holidays b. Maternity and failure to capture knowledge in time lead to reinvention of the wheel 4. Sickness – people outflow a. Unexpected nature 5. Training and development (attending external courses; or bringing back training ideas from outside) a. Apprentices – taking people’s place b. Training courses from external and training and development 6. Involvement and participation strategies to make people feel they own the direction of the company strategy – knowledge sharing mechanisms and culture a. Involvement and participation strategies let people own the company b. Resistance to new knowledge (culture) c. Not wanting to share knowledge (culture indispensability) d. Sharing knowledge – good finishing product e. Cultural difference in working practices f. Human difficulties getting people to input into knowledge databases and to use them g. Hindrance of old employees not keeping up to date h. Separate business units need constant realigning Initial categories and coding from scoping interviews Knowledge Leakage Project Page 14 of 18 i. Trust when people leave to build networks j. Social interactions 7. Temporary workers – People inflow and outflow a. Access to computer systems by temporary workers b. IT consultants c. IT consultants (subcontractors and temporary staff) 8. Knowledge Transfer Partnerships with Universities and involvement in academic courses to build up future capacity a. Leaking knowledge to academia to foster new talent of employee inflow b. Work with research and development (universities’ know-how) 9. Intentional development of multi-disciplinary team (or multi-skill team) to ensure learning between disciplines/professions/other skills sets Internal/External 1. Lack of managing employees’ knowledge or inadequacy of ‘knowledge manager’ 2. Adequacy of diffusing knowledge from external source to different parts of the organisation 3. Intentional top-down communication of organisational strategy 4. Dependency on electronic systems (in particular when systems fail completely and knowledge is lost completely) 5. Use of electronic systems a. Lack of mining through employees’ computer systems b. Personal choice of what to back up Initial categories and coding from scoping interviews Knowledge Leakage Project Page 15 of 18 Appendix D: Trust 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Broken trust by making employee redundant deal with suppliers for many years based on trust without legal bindings former employee – outsourcing to India Trust of temporary workers Suppliers selected through trust Developing long term relationships with suppliers so they won’t pay you against the competitor 7. With customers/suppliers to share problems without them going elsewhere 8. Trust of long-term employees Initial categories and coding from scoping interviews Knowledge Leakage Project Page 16 of 18 Appendix E: Interesting issues 1. Difficulty finding apprentices – cultural change, no longer see it as glamourous 2. Time span of usefulness of knowledge (project time spans) – shelf life of knowledge 3. Criticality of knowledge determined through gut feeling 4. Overflow of too much knowledge Initial categories and coding from scoping interviews Knowledge Leakage Project Page 17 of 18 Appendix F: Issues not emerging from interviews but evident in literature 1. Guest engineers 2. Co-location and co-temporality 3. Move to emerging markets – produce competitor by teaching them competences Initial categories and coding from scoping interviews Knowledge Leakage Project Page 18 of 18