THE APPLICATION OF CORPUS DATA IN THE PREAPRATION OF GRAMMAR BOOKS – OUTLINE Major goals: - to show that corpus research is necessary to provide an accurate description of language - to evaluate a grammar book based on the author’s linguistic intuition and experience: its weak points, solutions on how to complement it Chapter 1 1. The study of grammar understanding the structure of language different perspectives/approaches: - prescriptive - descriptive - theoretical (including Chomsky) - empirical – corpus 2. How is grammar taught? Harmer: - exposure - understanding the meaning - understanding the form - practice Higgins - various procedures – overlap with Harmer’s points - “grammar teaching is not well understood at all” 3. The perspective of a learner grammar necessary for communication taught/learnt in the classroom – Kennedy: “responsible teaching involves selecting what is worth giving attention to” - selection – more information in grammar books - certain aspects of language cause problems – teachers and learners resort to grammar books 4. Grammar books ideally – all the rules and multitude of examples - variations, exceptions, vocabulary, collocations necessary – additional information: doubts, questions – searching for answers, solutions, guide Chapter 2 1. Corpus linguistics definition – general annotation – part of speech tagging application – language teaching - improving teaching materials – providing better description of real life language use - language learnt and taught as a medium for communication Chomsky: competence vs. performance - competence: “explains and characterises a speaker’s knowledge of language” - performance: “poor mirror of competence” corpus – real life language use, performance - necessary – as complementation, confirmation, source of examples Chapter 3 1. That clauses descriptions - traditional – Swan, Martinet (general) - corpus-based – my investigation: patterns of use, association patterns - reported speech (details) Swan and his grammar book - description of that clauses - reported speech comparison - Swan vs. corpus investigation - Swan vs. Hewings Conclusions