BUILDING BIODIVERSITY INTO ALLANBLACKIA INITIATIVES: FOREST AND LANDSCAPE OPPORTUNITIES Lecture handout for AB Tree Domestication Course, 23rd to 27th October 2006 Samuel Kofi Nyame IUCN, Ghana, c/o P O Box 527, Accra. Virpi Stucki IUCN, HQ, Fast track summary AGRICULTURAL Title Building biodiversity into Allanblackia initiatives: Forest and agricultural landscapes opportunities. Learning objectives Participants will be able to: Appreciate the potential of AB in forest and agricultural landscape activities. Describe some of the key issues that must be addressed in incorporating AB into these activities. Instructional methods Thirty-minute classroom presentation (PowerPoint) with discussion. Instructional materials ‘Lecture’ note, copy of PowerPoint presentation. Summary The genus Allanblackia, which belongs to the Clusiaceae family, appears to consist of nine (possibly 10) tree species, all restricted to Africa. Taxonomy within the genus appears somewhat complex, with some species having numerous synonyms, and the divisions between taxa indeterminate. All members of the genus are apparently dioecious (separate male and female trees), with trees being single stemmed, up to 40 m tall, with whorled branches, long-lived and long-fruiting, and the biggest fruit of all plants in African rainforest (particularly A. stuhlmannii). Draft Guidelines have been developed by IUCN and Unilever to promote a socially acceptable and environmentally sound market-based financing mechanism for the harvesting of Allanblackia seed, and to safeguard biodiversity and livelihoods in the tropical forest belt in Africa. The main message of the guidelines is that, if you adhere to these measures, you will have a market for your Allanblackia seed. There is a relationship between Allanblackia and biodiversity conservation in Forest Landscape Restoration and agricultural landscape approaches: Sustainable wild-harvesting = more equitable benefit sharing from the forest resource, providing an increased incentive to maintain and enhance the integrity of the resource (especially if seed buyers demand good practice). Smallholder production can help enhance the integrity of forest landscapes because incorporating Allanblackia into farming systems can contribute to improved landscape connectivity. The key lessons learnt so far for practical deployment under the Allanblackia initiative include: Local communities abilities should be enhanced to benefit from forests. Legislation that favours the sustainable use of AB and other natural resources, and that enhances livelihood security and forest governance, should be promoted. Species that are dependent on Allanblackia fruit and seed should be monitored and if necessary promoted, and the paths used in harvesting in the wild (forest) should avoid parts of the ecosystem that are considered of particularly high value. Impacts on other species (including animals) should be considered before introducing the tree into new areas. Natural and artificial Allanblackia regeneration should be promoted to compensate for the inevitable decline resulting from the loss of seed input from the ecosystem. Harvesting guidelines, although useful, are not presently easy to comprehend by local communities. These therefore need to be translated into local languages and simplified. Key references Amanor, K., Ghansah W., Hawthorne, W.D., Smith, G. (Nov 2003). Best practices guidelines (for discussions) Nyame, K. S. (2006). Allanblackia oil: supporting local livelihoods and conservation in Ghana. Arborvitae, 30, 7 Lecture note 1. Distribution, inventory and description of Allanblackia The genus Allanblackia, which belongs to the Clusiaceae family (which worldwide contains ~ 40 genera), appears to consist of nine (possibly 10) tree species, all restricted to Africa. Taxonomy within the genus appears somewhat complex, with some species having numerous synonyms, and the divisions between taxa indeterminate; to help delineate the relationships and boundaries between species, molecular genetic studies are currently underway, though no results are yet available. All members of the genus are apparently dioecious (separate male and female trees), with trees being single stemmed, up to 40 m tall, with whorled branches, long-lived and long-fruiting, and the biggest fruit of all plants in African rainforest (particularly A. stuhlmannii). According to recent review (2002 onwards) of available literature (including of previous botanical inventories) and herbarium specimens, combined with selected field surveys initiated by Unilever as part of the Novella Project, Allanblackia species are mainly distributed in the wet evergreen rainforest (and, sometimes, surrounding farmland) of the lowlands of Sierra Leone, along the Gulf of Guinea, through the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), to the uplands of the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania. The names and current known distributions of the nine presently determined species of Allanblackia are given in Table 1. Two members of the genus appear to be endemic to DRC and two to Tanzania. In some cases, the distribution of species is sympatric (that is, distributions are very proximate or overlap on a local scale; examples are A. floribunda and A. stanerana in Cameroon, and A. stuhlmannii and A. ulugurensis in Tanzania). Also shown in Table 1 is the conservation status of species according to IUCN reports; three species (A. gabonensis, A. stuhlmannii and A. ulugurensis; the last two endemic to the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania) are considered vulnerable in status, due to habitat loss and degradation and/or small initial population areas. Inventories of the densities of Allanblackia trees through the range of the genus are patchy (only certain geographic areas covered) and surveys are ongoing, but at some of those sites for which data are currently available, species can (especially in wetter areas) be found at high stand densities (including of mature individuals, for example in some Tanzanian forests), sometimes being one of the dominant trees. In addition, at a subset of locations, it is observed that Allanblackia trees are retained when other forest trees are cleared, possibly for local use of the oil or to attract bush meat, and are sometimes apparently retained in niches less favourable for crop production; this means that reasonable densities of remnants can sometimes be found in farmland after forest cutting. Although Tanzanian stands can reach high densities, the actual overall size of the Allanblackia resource in Tanzania appears to be fairly limited, because of the relatively small geographic areas in which the genus grows (the small mountains of the Eastern Arc). The above observations on natural stand density and farmland retention of trees indicated good potential at a number of locations across west, central, and east Africa for initiating harvesting programmes for Allanblackia, although it seems likely that inventories have sometimes overestimated fruit availability. This appears to be due to a number of reasons, possibly including insufficient attention to the issue of dioecy (~ half only of mature trees are likely to fruit), possible masting (year-to-year variation in fruit production) and the patchy nature of tree distributions. A further issue to consider when assessing prospects for harvesting is that of ease of access. What appear to represent large populations suitable for the establishment of harvesting programmes are in some cases located in countries and regions that are currently inaccessible, including for political reasons (for example, recent or ongoing civil war) and because of the absence of suitable infrastructure; although Allanblackia seed can be stored for several months before oil extraction, a reasonable road system is still required to deliver product to market. Both Liberia and DRC appear to have large stands 2 of Allanblackia that are currently excluded from collection for one or both of these reasons. In addition to considerations of population sizes and access, the ability to set up oil collection schemes depends (at least in the early stages of the initiative) on already established commercial interests in each of the prospective harvesting countries. From Unilever’s perspective, these and other considerations mean that Cameroon (with an emphasis on harvesting A. floribunda), Ghana (emphasis on A. parviflora), Nigeria (A. floribunda) and Tanzania (A. stuhlmannii, despite the rather small geographic size of stands) are of most interest for focused activities in the early stages of market supply chain establishment. In order of rank during early development of the initiative, Tanzania is considered first priority, followed by Ghana, Nigeria and then Cameroon. In each of these countries, Allanblackia is found in both natural forest and farm (and fallow) land. As can be noted by comparison with Table 1, therefore, harvesting and market development is considered to be of highest priority in the country (Tanzania) where both present Allanblackia species are endemic and, according to IUCN lists, are vulnerable in status (the third vulnerable species of the genus being located in Cameroon and Gabon); clearly, this raises some concerns from a conservation perspective and means particular attention to sustainability issues is required. From the genus perspective, therefore, efforts to bring Allanblackia into forest landscape restoration and participatory forest management strategies will be particularly important in Tanzania. Table 1. Allanblackia species and their apparent distributions Species Distribution Status of species (IUCN) A. floribunda A. gabonensis Nigeria to DRC Cameroon, Gabon A kimbilensis A. kisonghi A. marienii A. parviflora A. stanerana A. stuhlmannii DRC (Kivu), Uganda DRC DRC Sierra Leone to Ghana Angola, Cameroon, DRC Tanzania (Eastern Arc) A. ulugurensis Tanzania (Eastern Arc) Not listed Vulnerable, habitat loss and degradation (VU A2c) Not listed Not listed Not listed Not listed Not listed Vulnerable, habitat loss and degradation (VU B1+2c) Vulnerable, habitat loss and degradation (VU B1+2c) 2.0. The ‘Allanblackia: Standard setting and sustainable supply chain management Project’ in Ghana The Allanblackia business started in Ghana in 2002 as a unique public-private partnership (PPP) engaging participation and investment from the onset. The PPP initiated the Novella I Project of which the above project is a part. This unique partnership was developed to ensure the success of this novel project, from seed collection by local communities through processing to marketing. The broad aim of this partnership is to promote social acceptability, environmental sustainability and financial viability, and brings together the World Conservation Union (IUCN), Unilever, the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the Netherlands Development Organisation (SNV), the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic 3 Affairs (SECO), and a number of governmental agencies and civil society organizations in Africa, including local communities, in a bid to take action on global environmental and trade related commitments. The “Allanblackia: standard setting and sustainable supply chain management project”, funded by SECO and implemented by IUCN through its members (the Forestry Research Institute of Ghana – FORIG, and the Institute of Cultural Affairs Ghana - ICA-Ghana) and partners – Technoserve, Unilever and SNV (a novel implementation approach by IUCN to strengthen and develop capacity of its members and partners), was launched in Ghana in March 2005 with an initial duration of three years. The project is investigating the socio-economic, species and botanical impacts of Allanblackia commercialisation with the intention of providing instruments that will ensure sustainable harvesting as well as equitable sharing of benefits among the stakeholders. The overall development objective of the project is to promote sustainable development and trade in Allanblackia oil as a contribution towards national economic development, by diversifying income sources to improve the livelihood of poor rural communities and by fostering sustainable biodiversity conservation and management in Ghana. The specific objective of the project is to promote the instruments (Best Practice Guidelines) that will ensure sustainable harvesting of Allanblackia as well as equitable sharing of benefits amongst the various stakeholders (mainly the rural poor communities) whose primary role is the collection and selling of seeds of Allanblackia. The results of this project will feed into the best practice guidelines for the harvesting of Allanblackia. The expected outputs of the project are: Best-practice guidelines for Allanblackia harvesting are adopted by industry and collectors, Biological and socio-economic baselines are established, Institutional and legal aspects regarding Allanblackia harvesting are clarified; and that the Allanblackia supply chain is managed in a way that is environmentally sustainable, socially equitable and economically viable, with primary producers trained in good practice harvesting methods. The project aims to build capacity in local organizations in a way that external partners can then withdraw gradually from the project and leave the Ghanaian’s to take over the markets. Other long-term benefits of the project should include: Reduced poverty in pilot field sites, Increased export earnings and improved national-level economic development, Functioning small- and medium-scale businesses along the supply chain; and Improved forest quality and cover through protection and restoration of forests with native species. The short-term benefits of the project include development of good-practice guidelines, which will serve as a practical tool for the beneficiaries ranging from the collectors to the small- and medium-sized enterprises. Considerable effort, through training and other capacity building campaigns, is made to ensure that the guidelines are used in the field and that they are suitable and easily-utilizable on a daily basis. At the end of the project, the impact of wild picking of Allanblackia on biodiversity and on local socio-economic conditions will have been determined. The results of these studies will be used to guide future harvesting and project activities, so as to ensure that supply chain practices are socially equitable and do not harm biodiversity. Similarly, legal and tenurial questions related to Allanblackia harvesting at local, national and international levels will have been determined, in order to ensure that the activities 4 carried out by the different stakeholders along the supply chain respect local, national and international laws. Other short-term benefits include making sure that targeted small- and medium-size enterprises have new skills on running their businesses, which will help them to operate independently in Allanblackia markets when the project ends. They will also have the capacity to operate and earn their living with other products than that of Allanblackia, if need be. At the end of the project, through a communications component, local public in Ghana as well as global public internationally will be aware of the Allanblackia public-private partnership and its implications for forest conservation. This will ensure that the lessonslearnt from the project are widely distributed through printed and electronic media. IUCN’s members and partners in Ghana actually involved with the implementation of project activities in the field are as follows: 3.0. The Forestry Research Institute of Ghana (FORIG) together with an international forest ecologist, Dr. William Hawthorne, who have established structures for the biological monitoring of Allanblackia. The Institute of Cultural Affairs (ICA), together with a Ghanaian anthropologist Prof. Kojo Amanor, who have collected baseline socio-economic and indigenous knowledge data in the project’s target villages, and have carried out education and awareness creation on forest conservation in the project target villages and other AB endemic communities in the Western region of Ghana. Technoserve (TNS), who have carried out a supply chain stakeholder analysis and organized Business Development Services (BDS) trainings for a selected group of stakeholders (focal persons) Development and use of harvesting guidelines To secure a sustainable supply of Allanblackia seed to meet the needs of the buyer (currently only Unilever), harvesting guidelines were developed by IUCN and Unilever in an interdisciplinary team in 2003. In the short term, guidelines will be used for harvesting seed from natural stands by the Unilever supply chain. In the longer term, guidelines will be applied to Allanblackia harvesting from natural and cultivate stands involving other buyers or supply chain arrangements. A draft version of the guidelines is currently being tested in the field in Ghana to ensure their usefulness for all current and potential stakeholders. Although these guidelines have been developed for Ghana, they are expected to be largely relevant in other countries within the Novella initiative. The main message of these guidelines is that, if you adhere to these measures, you will have a market for your Allanblackia seeds. Because Unilever and other potential buyers have an interest in being associated with fair and ethical behaviour, they will not buy from suppliers who will not comply with the guidelines, in order to safeguard their reputations. However, since the trade is involved with many unknowns, the emphasis in the short to medium term should or will be on assisting suppliers to attain standards through a mutual learning process, while these standards evolve in a way that remains attainable. These guidelines are additional to the legal obligations international legislation on individual harvesters, groups, and invariably all other stakeholders along the supply frameworks include the Business Principles Code of Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD). 5 placed by local, national and employers, local communities chain. Other applicable legal (for now) Unilever and the 3.1. Objectives of the guidelines The intention of the guidelines is that Allanblackia harvesting using given recommendations will continue to yield well over the years, without diminishing the other values of forest for present and future generations. Local communities and individuals should benefit from their involvement in harvesting. However, they will need to maintain their independence and not to suffer from any vulnerability in a situation where the project fails to achieve success commercially. Basically there are four main objectives of the guidelines and these are to: Sustain biodiversity in the landscape (minimise adverse effects on biodiversity, making a positive contribution where possible), Sustain social and local economic values (enable local communities to protect and improve their well being and environments), Sustain the physical environment (minimise adverse effects on the physical environment); and Sustain product supply and value (produce high quality product, while maintaining the viability, diversity and yield of existing source trees) Copies of the draft version of the guidelines are available (contact Mr. Samuel Kofi Nyame at samuel.kofi.nyame@iucn.org or Virpi Stucki at virpi.stucki@iucn.org) The guidelines objectives will be achieved as long as everyone understands and conforms to certain Principles of behaviour. The principles adopted in the drafting of the guidelines relate to biodiversity - animal life, plant life and vegetation, Allanblackia populations, genes, local variation patterns and regeneration, social – social structures, information, education & awareness, fairness, equitability, culture and historical diversity, individual health and safety; environmental – nutrient cycles and soil quality, forest structure, pollutants and synthetic chemicals; and commercial outcomes – oil quality, seed/oil quantity and sustained supply. The principles are listed in section Error! Reference source not found. of the guidelines dealing with the four objectives. It must be pointed out that these principles are fairly general and may be hard to adhere to or interpret, so at the most practical level, as is recommended in sections Error! Reference source not found. (harvesting) and Error! Reference source not found. (Planting Allanblackia) of the guidelines, are some typical actions required to conform to the principles. Certain specific actions have been listed as examples of how the principles should be converted into Good Practice. A few examples are listed below For wild harvesting Do not cut down trees to harvest Wherever possible encourage regeneration of Allanblackia stands as part of forest restoration, agroforestry schemes or within farmland. If possible, work with nature by promoting natural regeneration and encouraging dispersers Develop and promote a good understanding of propagation techniques Research proportion of seeds that are dispersed by which animals Ensure that access to Allanblackia harvesting is equitable Protect trees (even if not Allanblackia) within riparian strips, on steep slopes and in the land between farms; in particular, don’t make wide paths by felling trees For Planting Allanblackia Promote Allanblackia cultivation, but cautiously as the market may collapse. Do not make an Allanblackia monoculture: Mixed plantations of this shade tolerant, small-crowned tree will provide more ecological and economic security Promote knowledge of how to identify Allanblackia seedlings and don’t unnecessarily kill seedlings when clearing land Don’t chop down other trees on riverbanks to make space for Allanblackia 6 Conduct standard, extensive research and trials on Allanblackia arboriculture (some listed below), ranging from the basic germination trials to provenance trials of seed production etc. The specific guidelines recommended are open to evolution and adaptation and cannot provide specific actions for all possible eventualities. The guidelines listed provide insight into how the principles may be applied for the objectives to be achieved. Practitioners are therefore expected and encouraged to develop appropriate responses to unexpected situations as they arise. This may lead to differences in guidelines between countries. The key differences may arise from differences in social, culture and historical diversity in the different countries. These guidelines may be plagued with several challenges, which may be seen as the practical management issues to deal with. Key amongst these are: 4.0. Acceptance and adherence by stakeholders in the supply chain, Accessibility and understanding of the guidelines, Enforcement of guidelines; can one be sanctioned for non-compliance, apart from non-purchase of nuts? If yes, what sanction? Will it be lawful or not? How to encourage community-based efforts that will promote structures that enable the equitable sharing of biodiversity benefits and associated intellectual property rights. Funding of the various research programmes outlined in the guidelines e.g. agricultural research needed to determine what inputs are needed or desirable for the agroforestry systems or plantations advocated by the guidelines. Allanblackia and biodiversity Restoration Approach conservation- A forest landscape There is a relationship between Allanblackia and biodiversity conservation because, sustainable wild-harvesting will lead to more equitable benefits sharing from the forest resource. In addition, Allanblackia will provide an increased incentive to maintain and enhance the integrity of the resource (especially if buyers demand good practice), and smallholder productions of Allanblackia can help enhance the integrity of forest landscapes, with Allanblackia incorporated into farming systems contributing to improved landscape connectivity. In many African countries, forest landscapes have been modified through man’s activities such that they can no longer deliver the goods and services people need now and in the future. A Forest Landscape Restoration (FLR) approach aims to negotiate with stakeholders those activities that provide the optimum outputs in terms of total delivery of goods and services – such as biodiversity conservation, enhanced options for livelihoods, and environmental functioning at the landscape level. FLR is a pragmatic and forward-looking approach to addressing forest loss and degradation worldwide. Recognizing that tree cover no longer dominates many tropical forest landscapes, and that land use has dramatically decreased the availability of forest goods and services, FLR focuses on restoring forest functionality. This means restoring the goods, services and ecological processes that forests can provide at the broader landscape level rather than solely promoting increased tree cover at a particular location. FLR acknowledges the reality that a typical forest landscape today is more likely to be a mix of primary, secondary, managed and degraded forest interspersed with plantations and areas of non-forest land uses. It recognises that the livelihood and land-use strategies of the communities living in these landscapes are determined more by real-life trade-offs rather than any direct motivation to return forest landscapes to their original pristine state. FLR is hence an approach that seeks to put in place forest-based assets 7 that are good for both people and the environment. It incorporates a number of existing rural development, conservation and natural resource management principles and works to restore multiple forest functions to degraded landscapes. However, there is no set blueprint for FLR, and restoring forest functionality to a landscape has to be built around a collaborative process of learning and adaptive management. Allanblackia provides a unique opportunity to use a native tree species, with environmental and economic benefits, to restore degraded forest lands in Ghana and other African countries that have experienced a period of exotic species plantations resulting in negative consequences for local biodiversity and livelihoods. The tree has thick bark which gives it relatively good resistance against forest fires (some farmers in the semi-deciduous forest landscapes value it for reducing risks of farm fires during the dry season since the tree keeps the ground moist) and thus adds to its positive qualities for restoration, where wild or bush fires cause appreciable damage to biodiversity every year. Allanblackia casts only minimal shade with its narrow crown and is sometimes hard to remove because it sprouts easily. Smallholder productions of Allanblackia can help enhance the integrity of forest landscapes, while incorporating Allanblackia into farming systems will contribute to improved landscape connectivity. Using Allanblackia in forest landscape restoration programmes, although potentially beneficial, also has some risks to biodiversity. These include the possibility of overharvesting seed sources, with the impact this may have on regeneration, and the evolution of Allanblackia into a plantation tree (contrary to Novella Project objectives). Furthermore, there are habitat disturbance issues linked to seed collection. These risks can be reduced through careful management and by promoting legislation that favours the sustainable use of Allanblackia and enhances livelihood security and forest governance. In order to ensure that sufficient amounts of AB trees are available for seed production, forest management systems across a continuum of forest landscapes is being explored. These include agroforestry systems, natural forest management, secondary forest management, community forestry, co-management, etc. These options can help increase the income generating capacity of the forest for local farmers, while ensuring that the diversity within forest ecosystem is maintained and the AB tree is integrated into local agricultural production systems. It restores landscapes in a way that conforms to farmers’ interests and enhances economic opportunities for both present and future generations by improving biodiversity through the recreation of forest structures. In Ghana, for example, AB is being considered for the Government’s aforestation programme under the modified taungya system. The AB tree will be one of the indigenous trees being promoted by the Plantation Development Unit of the Forest Services Division of the Forestry Commission. Meanwhile, to efficiently incorporate AB within FLR approaches, several issues need to be addressed. The key ones being transfer of know-how (propagation, development and cultivation of AB) and the collection of germplasm in the form of seed or vegetative propagules to nurseries and farmers 4.1. Allanblackia and biodiversity conservation- An agricultural landscape approach The project is poised to contribute to biodiversity conservation through the use of the tree in agroforestry systems in the agricultural landscape. The tree is common in the wild, and frequently used as shade tree in cocoa farms. However, the introduction of hybrid cocoa, that thrives well without shade trees, means that such shade tress are disappearing from farms (although hybrid cocoa does still benefit from some shade). All is not lost yet as this project and another initiative in Ghana, by Conservation International (the Conservation of Globally Significant Biodiversity in Cocoa Production 8 Landscape in West Africa), where AB may be included, will help save significant numbers of AB shade trees through market promotion. The cocoa farms can reduce encroachment into forests and protected areas, provide ecological connectivity among protected areas and provide on-farm habitat for certain species. In addition, well-managed farms can also maintain soil and hydrological services as well as act as carbon sinks. The overall goal of the project is therefore to conserve globally significant biodiversity in cocoa production landscapes in West Africa. The call by farmers for AB seedlings to inter-plant on their existing cocoa farms is a good indication of their willingness to help improve their landscape and also generate additional income. The use of AB in agroforestry systems offers possible solutions to the need to improve farm production and income at the small-farm level and at the same time combat environmental degradation, leading to the conservation of biodiversity. However, research is needed into cocoa–AB interactions, in order to understand the beneficial or otherwise impacts of AB planting in Ghana. Here germplasm collection of Allanblackia is necessary in order to evaluate its potential value in agroforestry systems.The provision of superior tree germplasm can facilitate the uptake of, and return from, agroforestry systems, bringing increased resources to farmers as well as providing other, environmental, benefits. Environmental benefits may include the protection of biodiversity, by decreasing exploitation of primary habitats and via circa situ conservation. 4.2. Allanblackia and Livelihood enhancement The AB project is thus a careful blend of the resources, expertise and interests of public and private organisations, in a unique public-private partnership, to pursue both a commercial and a developmental agenda that would/should benefit all participants based on respect, trust, commitment and a strong orientation towards the future. The seeds from Allanblackia will certainly add some additional income to that of the rural poor communities. Poor families who were unable to meet certain basic domestic needs now feel a little relieved as they are able to provide for some of these by proceeds from the sale of Allanblackia seed. For example, one Madam Ama Gyiwaah, a collector at Subriso (a community near Asankragwa in the Wassa Amenfi District of the Western Region of Ghana), when asked about the motivation and importance to collect AB, said, “there is certainly a big trade now for AB nuts and the fact that the opportunity exists brings additional income into my family and helps improve my livelihood”. With this income she is able to contribute her part to the family upkeep and even take care of her personal needs, which would otherwise not have been provided for by her husband. She also said the project has the potential to create employment for her women colleagues, and she hopes to use herself as an example for other women in her community. When asked whether the environment would not suffer from her and others’ collection activities, she had this to say: “Why should a community like Subriso be deprived additional income from its natural resources when the rest of the country is not?” She maintained that since the nuts have now been recognized as very useful and bring them some income, she and others will endeavour to protect the trees, especially those on the farms of their husbands and in the wild. They will not cut the wildlings down. Allanblackia holds out the potential to provide a novel source of household income for rural populations, while contributing to forest landscape restoration and communitybased fire management. For all partners, it is essential that the new supply chain will be set up in an economically viable, socially equitable and environmentally sustainable way. In the short term, Allanblackia seeds will be gathered from existing tree –populations, while in the longer term, small holder agroforestry systems will be developed. 9 5. Key lessons learnt for practical deployment. Local communities’ abilities should be enhanced to benefit from the forests, through initiatives such as the Novella Project. Legislation that favours the sustainable use of AB and other natural resources, and that enhance livelihood security and forest governance should be promoted. [Legislation on NTFP development. There are no national laws regulating NTFPs other than wildlife outside of Forest Reserves. Most NTFP development occurs outside of reserves. Customary law therefore regulates NTFP development, which because it follows social consensus is currently in a state of flux as contending interests vie for control over landed resources. If NTFP prices increase significantly this could lead to conflicts in communities over the resultant rent.] Species that are dependent on Allanblackia fruit and seed should be monitored and if necessary promoted, and paths used for wild (forest) harvesting should avoid parts of the ecosystem that are considered of particularly high value. Likely impacts (positive and negative) on other species (including animals) should be considered before introducing the tree into new areas. Natural and artificial Allanblackia regeneration should be promoted to compensate for the inevitable decline resulting from the loss of seed input from the ecosystem. Harvesting guidelines are not easy for local communities to comprehend, and need to be simplified and translated into local languages. A great deal can be learned from efforts in FLR. For us working in poverty reduction and conservation, whether they call it community forestry, integrated conservation and development, or whatever – the challenge is to continually evaluate what is done, and to question its impacts on conservation and the poor. This sort of evaluation can help to change what is not working or is counterproductive and can validate ideas, approaches and strategies for future application. 6.0. Important gaps where further work or research needed The whole AB business is still evolving and a lot of work has already been done while others are currently on-going to make the business attractive, socially acceptable, environmentally sustainable and financially viable. Despite the enormous work done so far and still on-going, there are still more that are not yet known. Information on these will further enhance achievement of the above. We need to know existing cocoa extension recommendations on shade trees, including Allanblackia and critically examine the perspectives that promote these recommendations. We need to look at the impacts (positive and negative) of the AB – cocoa interactions on each other. We need research into cocoa farming that examines the integration of shade trees into cocoa plantations from a landscape restoration perspective, and which examines the problems that emerge when cocoa is old and replanted We also need to consider Allanblackia as one of a number of forest products that can be integrated into cocoa plantations, in which the synergy between the various elements leads to the enhancement of the agroecosystem and of the income of farmers We need to know what diseases, pests or parasites that AB is prone to and its resistance to these and other stress factors in the wild, on farmlands and in smallholder plantations. Information on animals dependent on AB and their impact on AB harvesting and the impact of AB harvesting on the populations of these animals is needed to ensure sustainable harvesting of the nuts and viable populations of these animals. 10 Certainly there is the potential of the AB to be processed locally to add value to the product to bring more income to the farmer – establishing small scale processing centres to meet the needs of the rural communities – just like the case with the palm fruits. But its feasibility and commercial viability needs to be research into to provide the needed information that will motivate people to do. Can Allanblackia cultivation provide an alternative cultivation system that contributes towards the development of a more sustainable agriculture? In addition to the above other areas to explore to fill the gaps in knowledge on AB have been enumerated in the draft guidelines 7.0. References Amanor, K., Ghansah W., Hawthorne, W.D., Smith, G. (Nov 2003). Best practices guidelines (for discussions) Dawson I, (2006). Novella Project Baseline elements: a review (unpublished). IUCN (2005). Allanblackia; standard setting and sustainable supply chain management. Project document Kyeretwie A. Opoku, (2006). Allanblackia: standard setting ands sustainable supply chain management project: Legal and Institutional aspects. Final report Nyame, K. S. (2006). Allanblackia oil: supporting local livelihoods and conservation in Ghana. Arborvitae, 30, 7 11