MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD
SUBJECT: Proceedings – Air Force Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — Management Session
GENERAL: – The Air Force Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council (ESA ARC) Management Session convened
at 0800 on 10 April 2014 in Atlanta, GA hosted by the Georgia Air National Guard.
DoD SESSION PROCEEDINGS FOR 10 APRIL, 2014
A. Remarks/Objectives/Introductions: Colonel Studer (FL Air National Guard) and Colonel Gage (MA Air
National Guard) welcomed everyone to Atlanta and thanked them for working on airspace.
1. Colonel Gage added that next year's meeting is planned for NY and potentially being hosted at New York
Center, at the Islip Airport on Long Island.
2. Introductions - Colonel Studer mentioned that there are a lot of issues to discuss such as the use of RPAs in
special use airspace, new airspace proposals and the F-35 becoming operational and the airspace utilization to
support that training.
B. Unit Briefings
1. NY ANG - Syracuse - Lt Col McCrink 174th Attack Wing - MQ-9 Reaper
 Syracuse operates MQ-9 Reaper aircraft and trains new pilots and system operators at Syracuse.
 Mission: Provide Qualified Airmen And Weapons Systems Engaging In Joint Global Air, Space And
Cyberspace Operations, While Supporting Homeland Defense And Aiding Civil Authorities At The Direction Of
The Governor.
 MQ-9 Operations
 Local Launch and Recover from Fort Drum and train in New York Airspace
 Remote control aircraft for Intel/Surveillance/Reconnaissance (ISR) and Close Air Support (CAS)
support to the Troops on the ground in theater via Satellite link from Syracuse
 MQ-9 Capability
 Altitude
+20,000’
 Speed
100-230 knots
 Armament
2 x GBU12 or GBU38 - 4 X AGM114P/N (Max Ordnance 3,000 lbs)
 Endurance
15-20 hours
Low Light TV, IR, Electro Optical POD (Full Motion Video, IR Marker and Laser Designator)
 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)
 MQ-9 Maintenance Training - All MQ-9 Reaper Maintenance Training for the US Air Force
 Formal Training Unit (FTU)
 Supported By Local Flying From Ft Drum - Launch & Recovery Element (LRE)
 FAA Certificate of Authorization (COA) for at Ft Drum. At Ft. Drum the Reaper is observed until it
enters restricted airspace where it climbs above FL 180 and obtains positive control from FAA.
 2 Local Sorties Per Day - Control from Hancock Field, Syracuse.
 Remote Split Ops Success With Creech AFB for training they control aircraft over Nevada.
 LRE Options For CONUS Training
 Three years ago could not fly now use most of NY
 Training Events - Joint with Canadian participation.
 Desire to move flight ops to Syracuse.
 New airspace 180-230 over Syracuse for training. We can use contractor players as adversaries on the
ground for training.
 looking at a 50% increase in training capability
 We will continue to use Ft Drum for sorties supporting ordinance delivery training
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
1

Airspace in Northern NY

Requirements for Syracuse.
 C-Band control capability
 Environmental Assessment for flight operations
 COA by fall 2014
 Chase aircraft will be used from Syracuse. We will transition to independent operations when procedures
and systems allow "sense and avoid" as a complete replacement for "see and avoid" requirements.
a. The Army Grey Eagle is similar to the Air Force MQ-1 and use a radar system for "sense & avoid".
 Proposing using a secondary runway to minimize impact on the civil traffic.
 Working with Boston Ctr.
Future Missions
 Customs Border Protection
a. CBP Flew Predator B (MQ-9) From Ft. Drum June 2009
b. Short-term: Cooperation At Ft Drum With 174th ATKW
c. End State Desire: Integrated Operations At Syracuse International
 Defense Support Of Civil Authorities
a. State Requested And DOD Approved
 Title 32 Tasking In Defense Of The Homeland
a. Missions Modeled On Counter Drug Construct
Question concerning Lost Link
 Less than one per month typically caused by weather. High winds move the satellite antenna it is
normally realigned within six minutes. The loss link is designed for satellite link interruption.
 The Pilot calls the controlling agency. Call on the phone when the communication link is lost.
Question about MQ-9 lost in Nov 2013
 The flight was a normal training sortie with students.
 Navigation failure and the aircraft went to the holding point
 A second navigation failure caused the aircraft to look at the two bad navigation systems and the aircraft
flew into the lake.



Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
2
2. NY - Adirondack Range - Lt Col Tomaselli - The range is looking at JPAD deliveries which is a GPS guided
pallet with deliveries from 5,000 feet.
3. MA - Barnes ANGB - Lt Col Beckel - F-15 Air Control Alert (ACA) Mission
 Requirement - All Air Sovereignty Alert (ASA) Pilots must be current and qualified in LOWAT
Operations.
 F-15C Rap Tasking Message (1 Oct 2012)
a. Low A/A: Performing realistic, mission oriented air-to-air operations while in the 1000’-5000’ AWL
or AGL block.
b. 5 Low A/A events required annually for ANG (6 for Air Force)
c. Low ALT: Logged anytime air-to-air training occurs between 500’ and 1000’ AGL (LOWAT)
d. Expires after 60 days; inexperienced, 90 days experienced
 Contingency or AEF preparation may require CAT 1 LOWAT currency (500’ – 1000’ AGL Altitude
Block)
 The Condor MOA modification is needed to provide an area for low altitude training
 Started in 2001 - with the Test/Training Space Needs Statement (T/TSNS) in 2003 and the
Environmental Assessment (EA) that then became the Environmental Impact Statement. (EIS)
 Proposed MOA change in floor from 7,000 to 17,999
 New Condor Low MOA below the present MOA.
 Worked with Boston Ctr about aeronautical
 Considerations
 Noise Complaints & Environmental Issues
a. Noise spread out over a larger area
b. Eastern Air Defense (EADS)
c. Schedules Airspace
d. Designates noise sensitive areas
e. Eagle nesting - ME Dept Inland Fish & Wildlife
 Safety
a. Fighter mishap rate
b. Comm (Charts; Boston Center freq/Flight tests)
c. Expendables
d. Bird Hazards
e. See and Avoid (seeandavoid.org)
 Economic & Aviation
a. Majority of flying in winter to avoid commercial and pleasure aviation during the summer
b. Avoid airports
 Aeronautical Study
 One Victor route through airspace
a. Below current floor of 7,000’MSL (Proposed Condor High Floor)
b. Boston Center give point outs or Condor High only
 Airports
a. Airports with IFR approaches require LOA for operations during IFR
(1). Condor High only during IFR ops
b. Small private airports (Outreach)
 Avoid Ski Resorts and Wildlife Refuges
a. Program mission computer as SAMs avoidance areas
 Minor change to northwest border (Canadian route)
 Impacts
 Environmental Impacts reduced
 Safety Increased
 Noise reduced and spread out over larger area
 The EIS Contract expired last year and it had to be re-negotiated and updates were required.
 Tribal land update - still waiting of the response.
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
3
 The communication test was both UHF and VHF and was better than expected. Boston Ctr frequencies will
be published on the FAA Sectional Charts.
 The Governor of Maine asked for a public meeting in the summer.
 Mr. Brown (FAA CSA) there are questions and concerns about being able to hold the public meetings.
1. CT - Bradley ANGB - Colonel Gage - CT is now receiving C-130H airlift aircraft
2. NJ - Warren Grove Range - Lt Col Holzer - New commander at Warren Grove Range - the airspace has been
modified to improve training.
3. DE - New Castle ANGB - C-130 - Lt Col Kilcullen - Local Flight Plans are not being populated. NY Center
and Mr. Perkins will forward the problem
4. MS - Gulfport Combat Readiness Training Center (CRTC) - Major Tommy Gunter
 Gulfport CRTC Airspace is good, no proposals
 The CRTC is concerned with the SOCOM desire to increase the size of the restricted area R- 4403 controlled
by NASA.
 FAA Update
 The Aeronautical came back with the recommendation to disapprove except for a smaller expansion just
around the rocket launch.
 Desire to go to public comment.
 There is an impact to New Orleans and Gulf Port Approach and Departure routes and airspace.
5. MS - Camp Shelby (Hagler Army Airfield) - Major Birmingham
 Army National Guard operates UAS within the Restricted Areas over Camp Shelby
 The NG is looking at creating an airspace information center
6. AL - Montgomery F-16 - Colonel Sparrow
 Developing a concept for high altitude training airspace to provide a much large training space for new
weapons and tactics.
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
4
 Concept to use the Birmingham ATCAA, create an ATCAA over the Pinehill East and West MOAs as well
as a bridge ATCAA between the Birmingham ATCAA and the new "Pinehill ATCAA.
7. GA - Townsend Bombing Range - Mr. Viverette USMC
 USMC owns land, CRTC Savannah is using agency for SUA and operates the range
 The range has increased C-130 operations/
 Retain current operating construct, address differences in service policies in new range regulations
 Townsend Expansion to support US Marine Corp F-35 training
 Required increase land to permit training with new weapons that require much larger protected safety
footprints to enable safe employment.
 Enable the delivery of GBU-31/34/38 and GBU-10/12/16, Inert only.
 Acquisition of 29,000 acres approved
 Environmental Impact Study and Record of Decision are final
 Airspace proposal presented to FAA
 New land purchase to develop a new range
 Need to lower the Airspace floor to the surface over the new area for weapons delivery
 Fed Law Enforcement Training facility is also being considered
8. SC - ANG F-16 and Air Force C-17.
9. FL - Colonel Studer - FL ANG / DO - The state has a large Fifth Generation aircraft presence with F22 training
at Tyndall AFB, near Panama City and F35 training at Eglin AFB near Fort Walton Beach.
 Avon Park - no issues
10. Sentry Savannah 2014, Major Mansour "Reno" Elhihi, 125 FW Jacksonville IAP, FL
 Why create a Sentry Savannah
 Cutting hours from all services
 Aircraft are being retired
 Training in realistic environments is difficult (Airspace, Adversaries, and more)
 Excellent training comparable to Red Flag Nellis and Red Flag Alaska at a very low cost
 Sentry Savannah Exercise Airspace W157/158 plus Townsend Range
 More than 300 by 300 NM from the surface to 50,000 feet with compete Air Combat Maneuvering
Instrumentation (ACMI) coverage for exceptional debriefing and recreation.
 50 miles from Savannah and Jacksonville.
 CRTC at Savannah was a great operating base.
 Training - 17 Flying Days
 25 Units (Included two F-22 squadrons)
 7,000 RAP training events accomplished
 750 Combat Training Sorties
a. 570 from Savannah
b. 180 from Airfields around the US
 Trying to focus on tactical instead of deconfliction - Zero Safety Incidents.
 Different scenario every day
 Realistic 2 tactical freq kill removal allows scenario to continue without questions concerning aircraft
kills.
 Advantages of Sentry Savannah
 ACMI Playback
 Debrief capability - two hour pre-briefing, two hour flight, and 6 hour debrief.
 The Eglin ACMI is linked for everyone to participate in debriefing
 Important that the CRTC was able to create an exercise of the scale previously only available in the Red
Flag exercises in Nevada and Alaska.
 AWACS and other C2 assets were able to participate.
 Secure Debrief is very rare and exceptional
 The Air Force has directed integrated training with 4th and 5th generation combined training. Sentry
Savannah offer excellent integration to use the 4th and 5th gen capabilities as they can be best utilized.
 Sentry Savannah 2015 funded.- Feb 2015. NGB Funding.
 NC - USMC Unit conversion CH-46s to six squadrons of NV-22s.
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
5


Training requires much more airspace and a lot of ground training events
Looking at landing zones away from the ground weapons training ranges.
B. National Overview - Brig Gen Siana (CT ANG) thanked everyone for coming to the meeting. For the new folks,
airspace actions can take many years. The regional meetings are to help solve regional problems to achieve the best
training airspace available.
1. What we do is very important to the nation.
2. In the past few years we have had 5 regional meetings. We have now created the Southwest Region from the
existing Southern/Southwest region and will have three meetings aligned with the FAA Service Areas. We expect to
have next year's meeting hosted at New York Center.
3. We are having these meeting to ensure our combat aircrew have the best training airspace to maintain the highest
combat capability.
4. We have been extremely successful when new airspace concepts are vetted at the ARC for possible conflicts and
problems prior to going public with the proposal. We want to receive your feedback on the structure and content of
the ARCs.
5. Commercial growth in UAS - RPA is a major concern.
6. The RIM Fire in California with the MQ-1 from the ANG has many lessons learned for future use on fires.
7. Encroachment Wind and Spectrum. Boardman Range in the NW has major encroachment issues that is reducing
the capability of the training.
8. ADS-B is a giant hill for the DoD to meet. Cost of $9B minimum for upgrade.
9. The National Airspace/Range Executive Council (NAREC) will be Dec 10-12 at JB Andrews, MD
10. Mr. McGrath, FAA - encouraged units to make regular visits to the FAA facilities. The new controllers do not
have any knowledge of military operations and training requirements.
C. The Requirement for Training - Mr. Hebner (D3 Air and Space Operations - NGB/A3A)
1. Why Develop Requirements?
 We Didn’t Win World War II Because of Our Blinding Technological Superiority or number of aircraft.
 The German Focke-Wulf 190-D was superior to the British Spitfire and every American fighter prior to
the P51. The P-51 Mustang entered the war in the final year and it only had a 1,500 foot ceiling altitude
advantage.
 The German industry was building thousands of aircraft monthly only months before the end of the war.
 It was the quality of training that provided the advantage
 Operation Bodenplatte, Jan 1945 was the largest Luftwaffe Operation of the war undone by poor
execution and low German pilot skill
a. Allied - 10 killed, 16 shot down uninjured
b. German -143 killed/missing, 70 shot down captured, 21 wounded
c. 9 to 1 kill ratio
 Mariana Turkey Shoot, June 1944
a. Battle of the Philippine Sea – the lopsided outcome attributed to improvements in US pilot training
and tactics
b. 64 to 0 kill ratio in the air
 In Korea - Highly trained American pilots achieved 10-1 kill ratio over the superior Mig 15
2. Why Institutionalize Requirements?
 Viet Nam – the kill ration started at 2 to1 – we had to rediscover the same things…
 Report of the Air-to-Air Missile System Capability Review, the “Ault Report” Nov. 1968
a. Training and Readiness – A key issue in this area is the commitment of fighter squadrons to air-toground missions in Southeast Asia and the consequent dilution of air-to-air training and readiness.
b. Realization of improved aircrew performance should be possible through…more realistic air combat
maneuvering training…
3. Validation of Requirements
 The “Ault Report” led to the creation of “Top Gun” and Red Flag with ACMI
 The Kill Ratio at the end of the war had improved to 10 to 1
 The requirement to train as we fight, to use realistic training made the difference.
4. What Requirements Bought
 The Defense Science Board Task Force on Training Superiority and Training Surprise, Jan. 2001
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
6
5.
6.
7.
8.
 “In the last decade we surprised not only others but ourselves with our warfare proficiency. There is
evidence that the culture of our first training revolution is itself trainable. A new enemy might also
capitalize on the new training revolution. Training Superiority is ours to lose and for others to gain.”
Maintaining Requirements in Challenging Fiscal Environments
 Quarterly Defense Review (QDR) – Sept 30, 2001
 The uniquely American Superiority in training is eroding, particularly as evident in the aging
infrastructure and instrumentation of U.S. training ranges.
 Defense Planning Document 2004-2009
 Comprehensive and realistic combat training is an asymmetric advantage for US military forces that
contribute more to effective combat power than any single new system.
Why We Still Need to Train to the Most Stringent Requirements
 Cope India ‘04 –
 “the US F-15C’s were defeated more than 90% of the time…” (Feb 26 House Appropriations
Subcommittee)
 “Another surprise was the quality of training the Indian Pilots received. USAF fighter pilots log
about 250 flight hours a year. The Indian fighter pilots said they’ve been getting as many as 300 flying
hours per year and that the majority of those hours were spent in full-up training.
 In most USAF aerial combat training, the service has “dumbed down” adversarial equipment and training
to simulate what it believed to be the level of enemy competence.” (Air Force Magazine, July 2004 vol. 87
no. 7)
Training can be scalable
 In golf:
 sometimes you need the putting green
 Sometimes the driving range
 And sometimes an entire course
Airspace Requirements Development—The Whole Enchilada and...Scalability
 Sentry Savannah is an example of the graduate level training we need to maintain our combat advantage.
Large Force Exercise (LFE)
9.
10. Defending Requirements - “If the minimum wasn’t good enough, it wouldn’t be the minimum” may be
accurate for PT and PME Testing but…
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
7

Is the minimum Good Enough?
 If it fills RAP squares is it good training?
 Does it provide Realistic Mission Oriented Training?
 Do we need to “train as we fight”?
11. Flying a Tactical Aircraft… is not like riding a Bike
 The Busy Cockpit - Heads Up Display of:
 Airspeed, Heading, Altitude, Angle of Attack, Radar Operation and Missile Parameters, Steer Point,
Radio Frequencies…Then add:
 Formation Flying and Flight Maneuver for Tactical Positioning
 Threat Engagement
 Data Link Displays
 Opposition Aircraft – Missile Employment and Defensive Tactics
 GCI / AWACS
 Communications and Radar Jamming
 Targeting Pod and Target Identification
 Laser Designator
 Range Procedures
 Busy Radio...Busy Mission...
D. BLM/USFS Wilderness Fire Issues - Ms Stewart (BLM/USFS National Airspace Program Manager)
1. The BLM/USFS Airspace Program began in the 1980's to prevent midair collisions.
2. UAS Operations & RIM Fire update
 FS started in UAS Operation in 2004 when a UAS was used in Alaska
 In 2007 Global Hawk type system was evaluated.
 The high altitude operations works well by keeping him outside of the fire traffic aircraft.
 CAL Fire was the lead for the RIM Fire and there was a lot of coordination.
 IR fire mapping flights is an excellent use of UAS and was very successful at nights when the FS have
limited operations available.
 Identifying mission requirements is important
 The Forest Service is currently analyzing the requirements for ISR and where UAS fit.
 Dept of Interior has built three areas where they are doing multiple mission.
 Right now we are getting requests from military to support
 Small UAV at low altitude cannot be integrated right now.
 UAS will be part of the Fire aircraft in the future.
 The Fire TFR is not segregate and not acceptable for UAS operations today.
 FAA was very cooperative in all UAS requests.
 The Forest Service is very conservative and wants to do it correctly.
3. Mid-Air Avoidance - My job is to make sure our people are aware of the mid-air hazards.
4. 2014 Fire Potential - it has already started in the Southern Region.
 Scared to death in California
5. US Forest Service Aviation
 Owns and operates 27 aircraft & helicopters
 Contracts with over 800 aircraft & helicopters annually
 Missions Include:
 Fire surveillance
 Aerial reconnaissance
 Air Attack
 Delivery of smokejumpers
 Firefighter and cargo transport
 Aerial delivery of retardant and water
 Natural Resource Management
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
8
 Research
6. BLM Aviation Program
 Exclusive-Use Fire Helicopter fleet
 Type II and Type III helicopters
 Single Engine Air Tankers (SEATs)
7. Our Lands (National Forest and BLM land and DoD Special Use Airspace are nearly the same.
8. Every fire can be a unique challenge
9. Certain tools were developed specifically to ENHANCE airspace coordination
 Interagency Airspace Coordination Guide (2003) - will be revised soon
 Interagency Airspace Website - www.airspacecoordination.com
 Links to Interagency Coordination Guide
 FAA
 DoD Airspace Websites
 We use DINS but there are some issues with the website, (No graphics!!)
 1255 National Fire Fighting Transponder Code
 Fire Traffic Areas (FTA) - Similar to Class B airspace with defined altitude separation and radio contract
required prior to entry
 Automated Flight Following (AFF.Gov password required for authorized users)
 Valuable in assessing Airspace Usage & Impacts on other National Airspace users
 Google Earth applications
 Benefits of using AFF with Google Earth are valuable with 3D depiction of Temporary Flight Restriction
(TFR) airspace and fire aircraft.
 3D depiction of Special Use airspace including Military Training Routes (MTRs) with actual route width
(boundaries)
 What is the fire doing? (MODIS) provides near real-time infrared heat detection.
 Fire Perimeters that are produced by the fire GIS staff are available with daily updates.
 Airspace Coordinators
 Assist in deconflicting Airspace for Initial Attack
 Assess Fire Perimeters and Develop TFRs for IMTs
 Coordinate/and Consolidate TFRS
 Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) – 14CFR 91.137(a)(2)…
 A “TFR” is a TEMPORARY flight RESTRICTION enacted by the FAA, at the request of a responsible
party, in order to enhance aviation safety. Codified in 14CFR 91.137, 14CFR 91.138, 14CFR 91.141, 14CFR
91.143, 14CFR 91.145 and 99.7
 The TFR is the Fire fighting working environment to provide safe environment for operation of disaster
relief aircraft.
 91.137 (a) 2 Exceptions
a. Aircraft is participating in relief activities under the direction of the official in charge of on-scene
emergency response activities
b. Operating under ATC approved IFR flight plan
c. Law Enforcement Aircraft
d. VFR Airport Traffic
e. Accredited Media
 Computer Based Training (Two Modules)
 A-103 Basic Airspace
 A-203 TFRs and NOTAMs
10. MOUs or LOAs - R-2508 Updating the MOU
 Within the 20,000 square miles of R-2508, the following land management agencies are represented:
 National Park Service 26.8%,
 Bureau of Land Management 24.6%
 US Forest Service 13%.
11. Special Use Airspace (SUA) consists of Prohibited Areas, Restricted Areas, Military Operations Area,
Controlled Firing Areas, Warning Areas, Alert Area, National Security Area and Prohibited Area (PA)
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
9
 7 Prohibited Areas in the US including Camp David, White House, Boundary Waters Canoe Area, etc.
exclude all non-authorized flight operations.
 401 Restricted Areas (RAs) in the US. RAs confines or segregates activities considered HAZARDOUS to
non-participating aircraft (Bombs, Missiles, etc). Requires permission to fly within.
 406 Military Operations Areas in the US. MOAs contain military activities such as air combat maneuvers,
intercepts, acrobatics, etc. General aviation allowed to fly inside MOAs (Practice “See and Avoid”)
 38 Alert Areas in the US where there are pilot training areas of high volume or unusual aeronautical activity
is taking place. General Aviation may fly within the AA.
 184 Warning Area’s in the United States: contains hazardous operations in international airspace by DOD
such as missiles and bombing..
 Controlled Firing Area (US Army)
 There are more than 550 MTRs in the United States. The centerline is displayed on Sectional Charts. Routes
can be up to 60 NM wide.
 170 Air Force Slow Routes (SR’s) are flown by Air Force Cargo aircraft slower than 250 Knots.
 Flown at low altitude (Surface to 1500 AGL).
 Includes Para cargo and Parachute drop zones.
12. Additional Airspace:
 Air Force LATN’s are low altitude tactical navigation areas not published and used for random navigation by
Air Force Aircraft.
 18 Low Level Helicopter Aerial Refueling Routes
 Temporary Special Use Airspace can be created by NOTAM
 Cruise Missile Routes
13. Additional Airspace Complexities that must be considered for Fire Fighting Operations
 Multiple Air Route Traffic Control Centers may be affected
 Victor Airways and Airport Traffic Airspace
 Glider & Parachute Areas
 Smoke Stack Buildings
 Tethered Aerostats – 18 in the US
 Wind Resource Centers
 13,000+ of California’s Wind Turbines are located in three primary regions: Altamont Pass, Tehachapi
and San Gorgonio.
 Banner Towing Operations
 Electronic News Gathering (NEHA)
14. Flying Near the Border
 We coordinate all aviation operations near the border with Air and Marine Operations Center (AMOC)
15. Major Migratory Flyways - Bird Damage could be SEVERE!
16. Presidential TFRs – 14 CFR Section 91.141
 June 9th, 2013 – Presidential TFRs in California and we had a new fire
 What Happens when you “visit” a Presidential TFR?
 Intercept procedures and legal action may occur.
17. Special Conservation Areas Overflights
 Pilots are requested to maintain a minimum altitude of 2,000 (or 3,000) feet above the surface of: National
parks, Monuments, Seashores, Lake shores, Recreation areas, and Scenic river ways
18. How do we organize our Fire Response? Through a systemized Dispatch response which tracks all resources
assigned to an incident.
 National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC/NICC) in Boise, ID
 11 Geographical Area Coordination Centers
 Air Operations Organization
 Unit Aviation Officer
 Aircraft Dispatcher
 Airspace Coordinator
 Air Operations Branch Director (AOBD)
 Air Support Group Supervisor (ASGS)
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
10
 Air Tactical Group Supervisor (Air Attack)
 Helibase Manager
19. Current airspace issues:
 Monday thru Friday normal work hours are usually not a problem in contacting Military Schedulers.
 But some numbers in FLIPS are out of date!
 Weekends, after hours and Holidays are a major issue in contacting Military Schedulers to confirm active
routes
 FAA Website not always current on evenings and weekends.
 TFRs on electronic devices are not always current.
20. TFR examples demonstrated the complexity of TFRs that protect fire fighting operations and accommodate
non-fire aviation activity.
 California 2012 a complex of three TFRs were created with the same interior borders that provided a safe
environment for separate fire traffic areas.
 Alaska 2013 fires were started by military action on two weapons ranges that had to be actively attacked to
prevent the loss of structures and personal property. These ranges were the primary target areas for the only Red
Flag Alaska that was retain after budget cuts. The exercise featured international units from Japan and Korea.
The Airspace Coordinator worked closely with the Air Force and the Alaska Fire Service to allow sufficient
weapons range airspace to accomplish the Red Flag exercise while maintaining a safe fire fighting environment.
 One TFR was created with a notch cutout of the airspace to accommodate a very expensive, time critical
helicopter operation for a ski lift operator.
21. Colorado Floods
 The initial request for a TFR was made by a county sheriff that would have created a TFR over the entire
county. The FAA objected to the configuration of the TFR.
 The county then requested an incident management team.
 The coordination was extensive with State, Local and Federal agencies and flight operations.
 The rescue operations were extensive.
 The problem was that FEMA did not start with an airspace coordinator and they requested Julie.
22. Unmanned Aircraft
 UAS will be a game changer but right now we are not using them on fires.
 Currently Fire Operations are fine with high altitude assets that operate above FL 180.
 Currently the FAA requires a 48 hour lead on where we operate UAS and we do not know where they will
be needed 48 hours ahead.
 The US Forest Service is taking a very conservative approach with an established evaluation of the use and
effectiveness of UAS in the fire environment. For the near future UAS operations will not be conducted by the
Forest Service.
 The Department of Interior that includes the BLM has established three centers of excellence; Alaska, Boise,
and Colorado to evaluate UAS effectiveness. They have flown many flights. There is no effort at this time to
begin UAS flight operations on fires.
 In the future we can expect UAS operations associated with fire.
23. Contact: Julie Stewart, 503-780-0097, j5stewar@blm.gov
E. NPS – Aircraft & Regional Special Use Airspace Issues - Ms Ward
1. Mission: Provide expertise and leadership to protect, maintain and restore acoustical environment and night sky
quality and to increase scientific understanding and public appreciation for soundscapes and night skies
2. Program Areas
 Overflights
 Acoustic and Lightscape Monitoring
 Acoustic Planning and Compliance
 Night Sky Friendly Lighting
3. Overflights Program
 Air Tour Management Planning
 The office works with the park supervisors in creating the quietest operations possible
 Airport Enhancement/Airspace Design
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
11
 Military Liaison
 Social Science: studies of visitor expectations regarding aircraft noise
 Emerging issues: UAS use in parks, development of quieter aircraft
 Work well with the AFREPs when we have a military aircraft noise problem.
4. UAS Operations - Ms Ward
 The Park Service is beginning limited UAS operations
5. Airspace Proposals come through this office and we coordinate with the affected facilities.
F. Special Activity Airspace (SAA) Automation Update - Jim Perkins (AIM Systems Group, AJV-26)
1. MADE/SAMS – v5.1 & v5.2
 The system allows users to edit the date/time values for historical schedules within the Historical Reports
screen using the Edit Mission Details functionality.
 The system provides utilization reporting for MTRs in a new MTR Report module. It reports the number of
schedules and sorties for an MTR by fiscal year.
 The Save Changes action on the Schedule Actions screen prevents multiple submissions of one schedule.
 The system does not allow users to modify a hot or active schedule to LGTS Out. These missions require 48
hour notification.
 The system does not allow schedules to be created or modified outside published times of use (TOU).
 The system will accept group schedules from CSE.
2. MADE/SAMS – v5.3
 To accommodate a user request to be able to filter specific times on the Amend Schedules screens.
 To improve the current functionality which triggers recalculations of the MTR start and end times after
airspeed modifications.
 To correct a bug which allows a user to schedule groups containing invalid airspaces that should no longer
be available to be scheduled.
 To accommodate a customer request to add the ability to edit altitudes and comments using the Edit Mission
Details form.
 To accommodate a user request to include the Auto-Refresh and Show Groups Only checkboxes as savable
Search Parameters.
 To accommodate a user request to make certain saved report search parameters viewable by everyone at a
facility.
3. Central Scheduling Enterprise - implementation is moving to 100%, should be completed this year.
4. SUA Website
 Public access website http://sua.faa.gov
 Enhance website to display National Security Areas (NSA)
 Enhance website to display FIR boundaries
 A number of “back end” changes to enhance usability
5. NSAAP / SWIM
 Collaborative effort overseen by ATO Operational Concepts, Validation & Requirements Directorate
 ATO Operational Concepts Group
 Technical Analysis & Operational Requirements Group
 Aeronautical Information Management
 En Route Standards Group
 Integration with the FAA Traffic Flow Management System (TFMS)
 Improve management of the national traffic flow planning
 Planned integration with TFMS in test environment May, 2014
 AIM Modernization Segment 2 working towards SAA distribution through SWIM to outside consumers
 Looking at handling of “non-SUA” types of SAA
 TFRs, ALTRVs, etc…
6. NSAAP Current Status
 SAMS
 Identify gaps between SAMS and other SAA scheduling systems
 Identify shortfalls and develop new requirements for SAMS
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
12




AIMMS2
 Targeting FID in Sept. 2014.
AIMMS3
 Identify requirements gaps between NSAAP and AIMM
 Develop AIMMS3 Shortfall Analysis Doc in Aug. 2014
ATM Systems
 Assess the SAA-ERAM integration option on ERAM Sector Enhancement
 Develop SAA-ERAM integration requirements
Policy/Procedure/Training
 SAMS Training available through ELMS of FAA
 Collect operational data reference the use of SAMS at each Service Center
 Identify shortfalls for schedule submission schedule updates coordination
 Modify JO 7610.4, SAMS guidance
7. CSE to MADE and SAMS Integration Site.
 Warren Grove will be online within a few weeks
 McGuire not on yet but Colonel Devito will take that information to the units
 If there is something that will make the system better send the request to Mr. Perkins and it will get into the
system.
 The utilization accuracy is based on the inputs from the field.
 The accuracy will be increasing with NSAAP
8. ATCAAs - When a new ATCAA is created we need to have the LOA sent to Mr. Perkins so that it is in the
database. Send them to the help desk.
9. Contact: Jim Perkins, SAA Automation Lead, AIM Systems Group, AJV-26, ph:202-385-7463 (office), 202450-0136 (cell), jim.perkins@faa.gov (e-mail)
G. AFSOC - Lt Col Eibe (AFSOC/A3A Acting Division Chief - Future ESA AFREP)
1. Legacy: To continue the Air Commando legacy, today AFSOC operates a composite force of multiple mission
design series aircraft, the majority of which are C-130 variants.
 Most of AFSOC legacy aircraft date back to the Vietnam era
 Re-capitalization of these assets has been a major priority for this command over the past decade.
2. Special Activity Airspace
 Special Use Airspace
 No 1 SOW owned SUA
 Heavy user of Eglin MOA & R-2915, R-2914
 Airspace for Special Use
 East Coast LATN - The Low Altitude Tactical Navigation (LATN) Area developed in 1978 and modified
in 1994.
a. Aircraft are flown over random tracks to a selected destination.
b. 1,040 C-130 aircraft flights per year - aircraft adhere to visual flight rules (250 feet to1500 feet AGL
and 230 to 240 knots).
c. 288 MH-53 helicopter flights per year, and
d. 72 MH-60 helicopter flights per year. C-130
 IR57, IR59, SR101, SR102, SR103, SR104, SR105, SR106, SR119,AR302, AR615
3. Growth of AFSOC Mission
 Gunships fly during day now, for 50 years they flew only at night in order to avoid enemy air defenses.
 New weapons and sensors are freeing the expanding Air Force gunship fleet to fly and fight in daytime,
heralding far-reaching changes in U.S. air power.
 The Air Force has added gliding Small Diameter Bombs to the AC-130Ws and is also planning to test out
Hellfire missiles.
4. Current / Future Efforts
 Stennis Space Center
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
13
 EA to be prepared jointly with Commander, Naval Special Warfare Command
(COMNAVSPECWARCOM) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Stennis Space
Center (SSC) for expansion of existing special use airspace.
 The airspace is required to support air-to-ground and interoperability training for Special Operations
Command units at COMNAVSPECWARCOM western maneuver area (WMA) and to support testing of the
next generation of NASA rocket engines and systems at SSC.
 EA includes three basic elements
a. Establish R-4403A-F restricted airspace (RA) in southwestern MS and southeastern LA for both
NASA and DoD use approximately 15 miles long by 13 miles wide
b. Establish up to 3 munitions impact areas for air-to-round training
c. Use the new R-4403A-F RA areas to accommodate ongoing and emerging DoD and NASA testing
and training requirements.
 The Gulf Regional Airspace Strategic Initiative (GRASI) is a collaborative effort to ensure near optimum use
of airspace by civilians and the military.
 Landscape Initiative is to expand the military capacity of the region identified two State/Public Study
Areas
a. Blackwater State Forest
b. Tate’s Hell State Forests
 Military to gain access on public/state lands for non-hazardous operations by mix of special-use permits,
leases, and MOUs
 SR-119 conversion to IR-1090 to allow IFR operations on the route
5. Emerald Warrior (EW) Mission Statement: Provide annual realistic and relevant pre-deployment training
encompassing multiple joint operating areas (JOAs) to prepare Special Operations Forces, Conventional Force
enablers, Partner Nations and the Interagency (IA) elements to integrate with and execute full spectrum Special
Operations in a complex and uncertain Irregular Warfare security environment using all aspects of live, virtual, and
constructive training assets.
 Execution: 28 Apr – 9 May
 SOCOM supported exercise
 Air Centric / Ground Force Commander supported tactical exercise
 AFSOC planned and executed (Only SOCOM exercise run by AFSOC)
 Combatant Commander Exercise Engagement Joint Exercise Program
 JNTC accredited and certified Mission Essential Tasks
 Conduct Close Air Support
 Conduct Tactical Airlift
 Provide for Combat Identification (proposed for accreditation)
6. Emerald Warrior 14
 90 – Live aircraft players (66 not counting MS NG RW assets)
 13 – 19 SOS Aircraft positioned on ATO to integrate local student training lines
 17 – Virtual aircraft players
 MS ANG Support (IDF Support):
 2 x RC-26B
 6 x CH-47D
 8 x UH-60H
 6 x HH-60H
 Partner Nation Summary (Participants):
 IDF – 2xC-130H / 200 personnel
 UK – 2xC-130J / 80 personnel
 CANSOF – 8xODAs/120 personnel
 EW13 comparison:
 52 – Live aircraft players (65 were planned)
 16 – Virtual aircraft players
H. Sealord Redesign FAA/USN - FACSFAC JAX (Sealord) - Mr. McNeal
1. Sealord airspace offshore Warning Areas from Charleston, SC to Daytona, FL
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
14
2. Current Warning Areas: W132A/B, W133, W134, W157A/B, W158A/B/C, and W159A/B
3. Issues
 Current URET & Future ERAM systems cannot correctly display Jacksonville Center SUAs with the
Release Areas.
 Special Operating Areas locally known to Sealord
 Only published in Navy docs.
 Hard to convey to non-participating users
 Transient units have to learn nuances of the airspace.
 Surface to FL 430 in the release areas
 The proposed Change will be smaller segments that will be recognized by ERAM.
 The proposal is currently at the FAA Eastern Service Area (ESA).
4. NavSched is the current Navy Scheduling system the new system FY15 DCAS has a user interface for only line
scheduling.
5. New Warning Areas will increase to a total of 32 with a new naming convention.
 No more Special Operations Areas.
 No more "hidden" release areas.
6. Mr. Perkins added that the problem currently is that the military does not show the segments and therefore those
pieces cannot be deactivated separately. This change will provide more flexible use of the airspace.
7. Expect to publish new airspace before the end of Feb 2015.
8. Point of Contact: Ronald McNeal, 904-542-2112, ronald.mcneal@navy.mil.
BEFORE
AFTER
I. Open discussion
1. Decommissioned NAVAIDs - Mr. Steve Brown  The removal of VOR and TACANs will create changes to the MTR program
 Some of those NAVAIDs aids define MTR turn points and no other NAVAID will be close enough to
provide accurate position information for turn points.
2. What to do with MTR-turn points define by NAVAIDs
 Remove the requirement for turn points to be defined by Fix/Radial/DME (FRD)
 This issue should be taken to the Policy Board for Aviation (PBFA).
3. MADE / CSE reports should conform to FAA Utilization
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
15
J. Wrap Up/Adjourn by Colonel Gage, Colonel Studer and General Siana - Thanked everyone for making this a
very productive meeting and listed the tasks for the ARC.
1. The Airspace Range Council Invitation list must be updated.
2. Need to receive inputs from attendees and all stakeholders about agenda item for future meetings.
3. Agenda Items for next year.
 FAA - NEXGEN update.
 FAA - ADS-B update briefing
 FAA - UAS Test Update and File and Fly Progress
 OEAAA process from units in the west
 HAF - USGS has a data base for wind turbines.
MANAGEMENT SESSION ADJOURNED AT 1700
APPROVED
// Signed //
MATTHEW GAGE,
Colonel, USAF
HQ MA Air National Guard/JF(A3)
Co-Chairman, Eastern-New England Region
Airspace/Range Council
// Signed //
SCOTT STUDER,
Colonel, USAF
HQ FL Air National Guard/DO
Co-Chairman, Southern Region Airspace/Range Council
Attachments
1. Agenda
2. List of Attendees
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
16
Agenda
Eastern Service Area Airspace and Range
Council
April 2014
10 Apr – Management Session
0800
Welcoming Remarks
Col Studer / Col Gage
0815
Introductions
Col Studer / Col Gage
– Unit Briefings –
-
Refer to Regional Maps
Identify POC, what you fly, where, any issues
0900
National Overview
Brig Gen Siana
0915
FAA Airspace Management Plan
Mr. Moore
0945
The Requirement for Training
Mr. Hebner
1000
Rim Fire Operations
1030
Break
1100
Savannah Sentry
1200
LUNCH
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
Attachment 1 - 1
Agenda
Eastern Service Area Airspace and Range
Council
April 2014
10 Apr – Management Session
1315
1330
1430
1500
1530
1630
1700
AFREP Updates
- Airspace proposal updates
Military Perspectives – Regional
- Major Command Updates
- ANG Updates – HARP – Condor
- AFREP – USN / FACSFAC –USAR – USMC
NAS Users Perspectives – Regional
- AOPA
- NBAA
- State Aviation Offices (TAG Invitations)
- Other Stakeholders – Civil Users of SUAS and Ranges
Break
Public Aviation Agency Perspectives - Regional
- BLM - Forest Service Aircraft/Airspace Issues
- NPS – Aircraft & Regional Special Use Airspace Issues
- CBP – Regional Airspace Utilization & Coordination
FAA Updates
- ARTCC Airspace Concerns
- ATCSCC
- NSAAP Project/SWIM
- DINS/NOTAM
- ERAM
- HARP
- RPA in the NAS
Lt Col Farnsworth
Col Studer
Ms McCaffrey
Mr. Lamond
Ms Stewart
Ms Ward
Jim Perkins
Mr. Chupein
Round Table Discussion
- Issues, Concerns, Solutions:
Col Studer
Session Wrap Up – announce next meeting time / place
Brig Gen Siana
- Social -
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
Attachment 1 - 2
LIST OF ATTENDEES
LTC Lawrence Aguillard
DARR FAA DARR - ESA
1701 Columbia Ave
College Park GA 30337-
DSN:
Comm: (404) 305-6916
Cell:
Email Lawrence.Aguillard@faa.gov
Brig Gen Glen Baker
ANG OKANG Chief of Staff
5624 Air Guard Drive
Oklahoma City OK 73179-
DSN: 720-5221
Comm: (405) 686-5221
Cell: (405) 517-2861
Email glen.baker@ang.af.mil
Mr. Joseph Bassett
Airspace Mgr ANG Eastern Air Defense Sector/DOA
366 Otis St
Rome NY 13441-
DSN: 587-6784
Comm: (315) 334-6784
Cell: (315) 338-3940
Email joseph.bassett@ang.af.mil
Lt Col Jeffrey "Monty" Beckel
Airspace Mgr ANG 104 FW
175 Falcon Drive
Barnes ANGB MA 01085-
DSN: 698-1228 or 698
Comm: (413) 568-9151
Cell: (774) 269-1432
Email jeffrey.beckel@ang.af.mil
Major Andrew Birmingham
DSN:
Director/Commander UASFC Hagler Army Airfield/F Co, 1-171 GSAB Comm: (601) 558-2532
Cell: (601) 278-1348
MS
Email james.a.birmingham.mil@mail.mil
Colonel Thomas Brown
JFHQ/DO ANG JF-NCNG
4930 Minugteman Way
Charlottle NC 28208-
DSN:
Comm:
Cell: (704) 579-0863
Email thomas.brown@ang.af.mil
Mr. Steve Brown
FAA - E.Serv Ctr FAA Eastern Service Center
PO Box 20636
Atlanta GA 30320-
DSN:
Comm: (404) 305-5611
Cell:
Email steven.brown@faa.gov
SMsgt Ben Bryant
Airspace ANG 28th ATC
6225 M Street
Meridian MS 39307 MS 39307-
DSN:
Comm:
Cell: (678) 491-9771
Email ben.bryant@ang.af.mil
Mr. Randall Burdette
Director ST DOT VA Department of Aviation
5702 Gulfstream Road
Richmond VA 23250-2422
cliff.burnette@doav.virginia.gov
DSN:
Comm: 804-236-3625 108
Cell: (540) 850-2206
Email randall.burdette@doav.virginia.gov;
Major Brian Carloni
Airspace MGR. ANG 157 ARW
302 Newmarket St Bld 257
Pease ANGB NH 03801-
DSN: 852-3353
Comm: (603) 430-3588
Cell: (774) 283-0607
Email brian.carloni@ang.af.mil
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
Attachment 2 - 1
LIST OF ATTENDEES
Colonel Anthony "Tony" Devito
JFHQ/DO ANG JF- NJANG
3650 Saylors Pond Rd
Fort Dix NJ 80640-7600
DSN:
Comm: (609) 562-0092
Cell: (856) 912-7213
Email tony.devito@ang.af.mil
LCDR Jeff "Doogie" Dugard
NAVY FACSFAC VACAPES (Airspace)
601 Oceana Blvd
Virginia Beach VA 23460-2283
DSN: 433-1248
Comm: (751) 444-0317
Cell:
Email jeff.dugard@navy.mil
Lt Col Eric Eibe
AFREP (appointed) AF FAA ESA AFREP
100 Bartley Street, Suite 110E
Hurlburt Field FL 36544-
DSN: 579-8540
Comm: (850) 884-8540
Cell: (850) 313-0389
Email Eric.Eibe@us.af.mil
Major Mansour Elhihi
Airspace Mgr. ANG 159 FS
14300 Fang Dr
Jacksonville FL 32218-
DSN: 641-7111
Comm: (904) 741-7111
Cell:
Email mansour.elhihi@ang.af.mil
Mr. Jamie A Flanders
Airspace Mgr. ANG NGB / A3AA
3500 Fetchet Ave
JB Andrews MD 20762-
DSN: 612-9253
Comm: (240) 612-9253
Cell:
Email jamie.flanders@ang.af.mil
Colonel Matthew Gage
ANG MA ANG JF(A3)
33 Boynton Ave
South Hadley MA 01075-
DSN:
Comm: (413) 536-9162
Cell: (413) 222-3561
Email matthew.gage@ang.af.mil; mhgage@comcast.net
CPT Derrick Glenn
Air Traffic/Air Space Camp Shelby
derrick.l.glenn.mil@mail.mil
MS
DSN:
Comm:
Cell:
Email derrick.l.glenn.mil@mail.mil
Major Tommy Gunter
OIC ANG CRTC - Gulf Port - Shelby Range
4715 Hewes Avenue, Building 1
Gulfport MS 39507-
DSN: 363-6053
Comm: (228) 214-6053
Cell: (228) 323-0081
Email tommy.gunter@ang.af.mil
Lt Col R.James Halley
ANG JFHQ / A3 MAANG
56 Mockingbird Ln
Westfield MA 01085-
DSN:
Comm:
Cell: (508) 740-6495 BB:413-579-7402
Email
Mr. Thor Hebner
A/S Specialist/NGB A3A D3ASO D3ASO
12486 Hillside Dr.
Plymouth IN 46563-
DSN:
Comm: (574) 248-2866
Cell: (574) 274-8083
Email thorulf69@comcast.net
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
Attachment 2 - 2
LIST OF ATTENDEES
Lt Col Mike Holzer
RCO ANG 177 FW Det 1 (Warren Grove Range)
NJ
DSN: 761-6700
Comm:
Cell: (609) 435-2361
Email michael.holzer@ang.af.mil
Mr. Alan Hood
Data Program Mgr ST DOT GA Aviation Programs
600 W Peachtree St NW
Atlanta GA 30323-
DSN:
Comm: (404) 631-1343
Cell: (404) 660-3394
Email achood@dot.ga.gov
ACCS Shannon C Johnson
NAVREP FAA ESA NAVREP
1701 Columbia Ave
College Park GA 30337-
DSN:
Comm: (404) 305-6905
Cell:
Email Shannon.C.Johnson@faa.gov
Mr. Landon Jones, III
Airspace Mgr. ANG NGB / A3AA
3500 Fetchet Ave
Andrews AFB MD 20762-
DSN: 612-9250
Comm: (240) 612-9250
Cell: (703) 216-5523
Email landon.jones@ang.af.mil
Lt Col Christopher Kilcullen
Commander ANG 166 OSS/CC
2600 Spruence Drvie
New Castle DE 19720-
DSN: 445-7531
Comm: (302) 303-3531
Cell: (240) 606-8802
Email christopher.kilculle@ang.af.mil
TSgt Ted King
Airspace Sch ANG 193 SOW/Det 1 Bollen Range
26-139 Ammo Rd
Annville PA 18003-
DSN: 423-1140
Comm: (717) 861-1136
Cell: (717) 434-8600
Email edward.king.2@ang.af.mil
LCDR Jody J Kite
Airspace Liaison Officer NAVY FACSFAC VACAPES
601 Oceana Blvd
Virgina Beach VA 23460-
DSN: 433-1248
Comm: (757) 433-1248
Cell:
757 433-1336
Email paul.kite@navy.mil
Lt Col Justin W Knox
Ops Officer USMC Marine Aircraft Group 31
DSN:
Comm: (843) 228-6542
Cell: (760) 390-6810
Email justin.know@usmc.mil
Mr. Harry A Knudsen, Jr.
Environment Spec D3ASO D3ASO
6684 Wisteria Dr.
Myrtle Beach SC 29588-
DSN:
Comm: (843) 650-7410
Cell: (301) 751-6538
Email knud645@gmail.com
Capt Joseph A Lindsley
ANG 155th AS/DOP
DSN:
Comm:
Cell: (601) 310-4503
Email Joseph.Lindsley@ang.af.mil; lindsleyj@hotmail.com
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
Attachment 2 - 3
LIST OF ATTENDEES
Mr. Glenn May
Airspace Mgr/ATC AF 96 OSS/OSAA
505 Barraucas Ave, Suite 104
Eglin AFB FL 32542-
DSN: 872-9069
Comm: (850) 882-9069
Cell: (850) 218-5555
Email glenn.may@us.af.mil
LTC Clifton "Clif" McCready
DARR FAA ESA - DARR
75 Long Shore Way
Newnan GA 30165clifton.r.mccready.mil@mail.mil
DSN:
Comm: (404) 305-6906
Cell: (770) 558-7216
Email Clifton.R.McCready@faa.gov;
Lt Col William "Rhino" McCrink
Airspace Mgr ANG ANG (NY SYR)
6001 E Malley Road
Syracuse NY 13211-
DSN: 243-2196
Comm: (315) 233-2196
Cell: (315) 708-6260
Email william.mccrink@ang.af.mil
Mr. Robert "Rob" McGrath
DSN: 434-1707
Military Ops Specialist FAA ARTCC Atlanta Center/MOS
Comm: (770) 210-7565
Cell:
Hampton GA 30228Email Robert.McGrath@faa.gov
Mr. Ronald McNeal
Deputy Airsapce Officer NAVY FACSFAC JAX
PO BOX 40
NAS Jacksonville FL 32212-
DSN: 942-2112
Comm: (904) 542-2112
Cell: (904) 253-9260 942-2525
Email ronald.mcneal@navy.mil
Mr. Ed Miller
RRD FEMA Region I AF 1st AF (AFSouth)/NSEP
1210 Beacon Bench Rd
Tyndall AFB FL
DSN:
Comm: (603) 498-4365
Cell: (603) 498-4365
Email edward.miller@us.af.mil
Lt Chris Mitchell
Airspace Officer NAVY FACSFAC JAX
BOX 40 NAS Jacksonville
Jacksonville VA 32212-
DSN: 942-2027
Comm: (904) 542-2027
Cell:
Email chistopher.mitchel2@navy.mil
Major Elena K O'Bryan
Branch Chief ANG NGB / PA
111 South George Mason Dr. Arlington Hal 2TS-230
Arlington VA 22204-
DSN:
Comm: (703) 607-2279
Cell: (571) 212-8410
Email elena.k.obryan.mil@mail.mil
Mrs. Tamera Palmer
Airspace Mgr. NAVY FACSFAC VACAPES
601 Oceana Blvd
Verginia Beach VA 23460-
DSN: 433-1233
Comm: (757) 433-1233
Cell:
Email tamera.palmer@navy.mil
Lt Col Robert C Parker
FAA Mgr AOV-230 ANG 286 Air Operations Gp / A3
6225 M Street
Meridian ANGB MS 39301-
DSN:
Comm: (404) 305-7200
Cell: (678) 822-3689
Email robert.c.parker@faa.gov
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
Attachment 2 - 4
LIST OF ATTENDEES
Mr. Jim Perkins
FAA AIM Lead SAA Automation
1575 I St. Room 9216
Washington DC 20005-
DSN:
Comm: (202) 267-6461
Cell: (202) 450-0136
Email jim.perkins@faa.gov
Ms. Renee Person
Airspace Sched Mgr NAVY FACSFAC VACAPES
601 Oceana Blvd
Virginia Beach VA
DSN:
Comm: (757) 425-1851
Cell: (757) 292-5513
Email leslie.person.ctr@navy.mil
Mr. Gary Rose
A/S Specialist/NGB A3A D3ASO D3ASO
7370 N. Catalina Ridge Dr
Tucson AZ 85718-1369
DSN:
Comm: (520) 360-5225
Cell: (520) 360-5225 520-398-3340
Email grose@d3aso.com; gary.rose@tbcradio.com
Lt Col Aaron Rose
NAVREP (USMC) USMC FAA ESA NAVREP
1701 Columbia Ave
College Park GA 30337-
DSN:
Comm: (404) 303-6907
Cell:
Email aaron.matt.rose@faa.gov
Mr. Devin Scherer
ANG NGB / A7AM Plans & Requirements
3501 Fetchet Ave.
JB Andrews MD 20762-
DSN: 612-8114
Comm: (240) 612-8114
Cell: (703) 638-5006
Email devin.scherer.ctr@ang.af.mil
Brig Gen Pete Siana
ANG JF/ CTANG COS
100 Nicholson Rd
East Granby CT 06026-
DSN: 220-2772
Comm: (860) 292-2772
Cell: (860) 883-1853
Email peter.siana@ang.af.mil
Mr. Rayshawn Smith
AF 43 OSS Airspace Manager
Pope AFB NC
DSN: 424-7650
Comm: (910) 394-7650
Cell: (910) 824-1298
Email rayshawn.smith.2@us.af.mil
Lt Chris Snaer
Airspace Mgr ANG 157 ARW (NH)
302 N32market St Bldg 257
Pease ANGB NH 03801-
DSN: 852-3588
Comm: (603) 430-3588
Cell: (303) 304-0964
Email christopher.snaer@ang.af.mil
Colonel William "Swapper" Sparrow
Vice Wing Commander ANG 187th FW
5187 Selma Hwy
Montgomery AL 36108-
DSN: 358-9102
Comm: (334) 394-7102
Cell: (343) 300-4382 FAX 358-9160
Email william.aparrow@ang.af.mil
Ms. Julie J Stewart
National Airspace Prgm Mgr. BLM FS/BLM
PO Box 3623
Portland OR 97208
DSN:
Comm: (503) 780-0097
Cell: (503) 780-0097
Email j5stewar@blm.gov; juliejstewart@aol.com
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
Attachment 2 - 5
LIST OF ATTENDEES
Mr. Byron Stubblefield
AF AFSOC A3VO
150 Bennett Avenue
Hurlburt Field FL 32544-
DSN: 579-1606
Comm: (850) 884-1606
Cell: (850) 543-3551
Email byron.stubblefield@us.af.mil
Colonel Scott "Scooter" Studer
ANG FL ANG/DO
82 Marine Street
St Augustine FL
DSN:
Comm: (904) 476-6462
Cell: (904) 208-1730
Email Scott.Studer@ang.af.mil
Lt Col David I Taylor
Airspace AF A3O-BAA
112 Luke Ave
JB Anacostia-Bolling DC
DSN:
Comm: (202) 404-2900
Cell:
Email david.l.taylor162.mil@mail.mil
Lt Col Fred E Tomaselli
Commander ANG 174 OG/DET 1 (Adirondack Range)
P.O. Box 320
Antwerp NY 13608-0320
DSN: 772-5990/2835
Comm: (315) 772-5990
Cell: (315) 842-0225 772-0121
Email alfred.e.tomaselli.mil@mail.mil
CDR John "Wes" Vingard
NAVREP FAA ESA NAVREP
1701 Columbia Ave
College Park GA 30337-
DSN:
Comm: (404) 305-6908
Cell:
Email John.Vinyard@faa.gov
Mr. Lee Viverette
USMC Range & Training Area Mgmt, TECOM
3300 Russell Road
Quantico VA 22134-
DSN: 278-3716
Comm: (703) 784-3716
Cell:
Email lee.viverette@usmc.mil
Mr. Mark D Ward
FAA Manager, Tactical Operations, Southern ATT1701 Columbia
College Park GA 30337-
DSN:
Comm: (404) 305-5570
Cell: (404) 597-3724
Email mark.d.ward@faa.gov
Ms. Vicki Ward
DSN:
Overflights Prog Mgr NPS Natural Sounds & Night Skies Div. Comm: (970) 267-2117
1201 Oakridge Dr., Suite 100
Cell:
Fort Collins CO 80525Email vicki_ward@nps.gov
Mr. Jim Webb
MOS FAA New York ARTCC
4205 Johnson Ave.
Ronkonkoma NY 11779-
DSN: 234-3730
Comm: (631) 468-1429
Cell:
MOS 631-468-5971
Email jim.webb@faa.gov
Lt Col Scot D Zamolyi
ANG 193 SOW Det 1 (Bollen Range)
26139 Ammo Road
Annville PA 17003-
DSN: 423-1132
Comm:
Cell: (717) 861-1136
Email scot.zamolyi@ang.af.mil
Eastern Service Area Airspace/Range Council — 10 April 2014
Attachment 2 - 6