Building emotional intelligence in teams What is emotional intelligence? Emotional intelligence is defined as "the ability to identify, assess, and control the emotions of oneself, of others, and of groups". In effect, it functions as the counterpoint to what we might refer to as "normal" intelligence, which is concerned with data and facts about the outside world. This digest is based on the work of Vanessa Druskat and Steven Wolff. Druskat and Wolff explore the effects of good or bad emotional intelligence on teamwork and teams in general and how emotional intelligence can be improved. One important thing to note is that a team made entirely of emotionally intelligent participants does not necessarily produce an emotionally intelligent team. Teams are a social group with a purpose, and therefore have needs and a character that goes beyond the personalities of its members. Druskat and Wolff provide a useful tool for assessing and assisting a team's emotional intelligence, and at the core lie three conditions which characterize emotional intelligence in teams: Trust amongst team members. A sense of group identity. A sense of group efficacy. Why should teams build their emotional intelligence? The benefits of effective co-operation within teams are pretty universally understood. However, Druskat and Wolff argue that most if not all of the literature on how to create an atmosphere of effective teamwork has simply restated the necessary elements- such as cooperation, commitment, participation and so on. The assumption seems to be that simply articulating all these requirements is enough, and once teams know what they need to have to work effectively, they will automatically be able to do so. Sadly, in the real world it is not as simple as that. Druskat and Wolff suggest that this approach leads to teams which may simply go through the motions of effective teamwork without actually exhibiting it. They use an analogy for illustration; a person can be taught to play a number of different instruments perfectly through constant practice. However this would not suddenly turn them into a brilliant composer without having to learn musical theory and studying other great composers' work. This tool was created by CUREE. For further practitioner friendly resources, visit www.curee.co.uk Druskat and Wolff make it clear that teams which do not satisfy the three conditions of emotionally intelligent teamwork mentioned above may still appear to be working effectively, going through the motions of dedication and effective communication etc. But in order to be truly effective, a team needs to create an atmosphere that genuinely promotes building trust, group identity and group efficacy. Three levels of emotional intelligence Druskat and Wolff's other key point is that to build an effective emotionally intelligent team, the members of that team must work to address three different levels of emotional intelligence. The first two levels are derived from the book Emotional Intelligence by Daniel Goleman. Goleman explains what defines an emotionally intelligent person; at the first level they are aware of their emotions, and are able to regulate them. At the second level, they can do this both internally (to themselves) and externally (to others). Druskat and Wolff recognise this, but add a third level when dealing with the emotional intelligence of a team. If we treat a group as being very like an individual, then we can say that it needs to be aware of the emotions of its members, the emotions or moods of the group as a whole, and the emotions or moods of other groups with which it comes into contact. Emotions at the individual level It is particularly important for the team as a whole to understand the emotions of all the individual team members when there is a clash. Druskat and Wolff suggest that the best way to do this is to encourage interpersonal understanding as a norm within the team. If teams and team members are encouraged to be routinely open about their emotions and what effect they have on how they handle different situations, then when an individual is not engaging with the team, the knowledge is available to understand why this might be happening and how to deal with this. The two key tools for a group wishing to be aware of and manage the emotions of the team’s members are establishing norms that connect both confrontation and “caring”. Though it may seem odd that the best way to help control emotions is to formalise confrontation, it is important for any group that teammates have a mechanism for airing grievances without the environment becoming toxic. Inevitably, at some point somebody will overstep the mark, and it is vital that their teammates can call them out on this without resentment lingering over the incident. Done well, confronting somebody who has erred is affirming for them; it helps them feel noticed and valued at the same time as enabling them This tool was created by CUREE. For further practitioner friendly resources, visit www.curee.co.uk to function more effectively. Confrontation can be a sign that it is important to the group that a team member contributes to the project. Emotions at the group level It is important to be aware of the emotions experienced by a group, as well as by the individuals within that group. If a team fails to recognise its emotions at the group level, then it can suffer a loss of drive, collaborative ethos and efficacy. A group needs tools to be aware of its own emotions, even if it starts out as a strong team, in order to avoid falling into these pitfalls. The two key tools a group can use to be aware of and regulate its emotions are selfassessment and external feedback. In order to be emotionally intelligent, a group needs both to examine itself and ask for assistance from elsewhere. In some cases, simply articulating a team’s strengths and weaknesses is extremely useful in building up the group’s emotional intelligence. Another helpful tool is a common vocabulary for dealing with issues. This vocabulary does not have to be technical, but having a group shorthand for particular problems, feelings and situations can be extremely helpful. Emotions between groups. The last level of emotional intelligence which an effective team needs to be aware of relates to interaction with other groups. As well as being inwardly aware of the emotions within and of the group, teams must be conscious of how they relate to the other teams they work with. For example, people may have extremely strong emotional ties to fellow team members, but may struggle to interact well with other teams within the larger organisation. A team which is emotionally intelligent about its relationships with others outside the team may attempt to create ties to the wider organisation, perhaps by bringing representatives of other departments or teams into the group. This is not of course a prerequisite of outward emotional intelligence for a team, but it is helpful for teams who wish to establish a solid understanding of other teams, and to foster good relationships with their colleagues outside of their own team. This tool was created by CUREE. For further practitioner friendly resources, visit www.curee.co.uk Implications Bringing the inevitable emotions that arise when working closely with others into the open helps colleagues manage them effectively: Individual level Would it be helpful for a team you work with to build some shared terms for common feelings that occur when people disagree about the best way forwards and some short hand phrases that help everyone in the team signal and make space to listen to such concerns such as “think we need time out to confront something that’s getting in the way here”? Group level Would it be helpful to invite a colleague from another team to join you to observe how your team works and provide an external perspective on your strengths and areas for development? Or alternatively could you video 2-3 team meetings and analyse them together? How does the extra information help you understand any recent challenges you have faced as a team? Can you use this analysis for spotting potential problems in advance? Inter group level Would your team be stronger or learn more from bringing members of other teams into some meetings or from asking other teams if one of your team can join in some of their activities so you can gain a wider perspective on how others work and ensure more people understand how your team experiences the organisation’s work and challenges? Find out more Druskat, V.U. & Wolff, S.B. (2001) Building the Emotional Intelligence of Groups, Harvard Business Review, 79 (3), pp.81-90. (Reprint r0103e) This tool was created by CUREE. For further practitioner friendly resources, visit www.curee.co.uk