Menu Search Options Green Manure/Cover Crop Systems of Smallholder Farmers 2004, pp 219-236 Green Manure/Cover Crop Technology in Eastern and Central Uganda: Development and Dissemination C. K. K. Gachene, C. S. Wortmann Purchase on Springer.com $29.95 / €24.95 / £19.95 * * Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT. Get Access Summary In 1992, Ugandan National Agricultural Research Organization along with International Center for Tropical Agriculture researchers from Kawanda Agricultural Research Institute initiated collaborative research with farmers in Uganda. Five villages in the vicinity of the Ikulwe District Farmers Institute in Iganga district of eastern Uganda were included. This area represents the traditional banana (Musa sp. L.)-coffee (Coffea L.)-based systems of the Lake Victoria Crescent agro-ecological zone. It has a mean annual rainfall of 1255 mm in a bimodal distribution and soils that are variable but typically have low total soil N as well as low P availability in Ikulwe. Banana, bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam.), cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz), groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) are important food crops. The approach was participatory, systems oriented and interdisciplinary. Research activities on green manure/cover crops (GMCCs) consisted of some designed by farmers and researchers, and some farmers’ own experimentation. Farmer-researcher trials indicated that yields of the GMCC species were reduced 40–70% when intercropped with a food crop as compared to sole crop production and that yields of food crops were reduced 61–87% when intercropped with Crotalaria ochroleuca G. Don. In contrast, maize grain yield response in the first season following sole-crop GMCC production ranged from 0 to 240%. These trials also indicated that Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC. and Lablab purpureus (L) Sweet were best for weed suppression and for control of soil erosion, that tillage and weeding requirements can be much less following GMCCs and that maize can often be planted directly in the holes left from uprooting Mucuna and Lablab, reducing labour requirements the following season. Land productivity was not improved with alley cropping. Farmers initiated trials on their own, such as on Tephrosia vogelii Hook. f. to control mole rats, which indicated effective control and resulted in significant adoption by neighbouring farmers. Other farmer experimentation focused on intercropping GMCCs with coffee, banana with Canavalia ensiformis (L.) DC., cassava and sweet potato, and Mucuna with maize. Researchers’ interviews with 19 of the farmer-researchers indicated that improvement of soil fertility followed by suppression of weeds was the most frequently mentioned positive feature of GMCCs. Uprooting of the mature GMCC plants was easiest for Canavalia. Lablab was most preferred for forage production. The legumes were similarly mentioned as effective in reducing soil erosion. Farmers frequently expressed concern about the climbing tendency of Mucuna as well as Lablab. Lablab produced little, but edible, seed, while Canavalia and Mucuna produced much inedible seed. Crotalaria was frequently observed to be laborious to cultivate. Canavalia, Crotalaria, Lablab and Mucuna differed little from one another in intercrop compatibility with banana, maize and cassava. Canavalia was more compatible with sweet potato than were other legumes. Information from on-station trials, formal on-farm trials and farmers’ own experimentation was integrated to develop a decision guide on the use of GMCC legumes. Researchers facilitated the dissemination of GMCC technology through informal seed exchanges, printed materials, farmer group visits to Ikulwe, agricultural shows, government and non-government extension, farmer experimentation mini-kits and provision of materials to stockists of agricultural inputs. A banana-Mucuna-dairy system and the Tephrosia system for mole rat control have been the most adopted. Look Inside Share Share this content on Facebook Share this content on Twitter Share this content on LinkedIn Other actions Export citations About this Book Related Content Supplementary Material (0) References (27) About this Chapter Title Green Manure/Cover Crop Technology in Eastern and Central Uganda: Development and Dissemination Book Title Green Manure/Cover Crop Systems of Smallholder Farmers Book Subtitle Experiences from Tropical and Subtropical Regions Pages pp 219-236 Copyright 2004 DOI 10.1007/1-4020-2051-1_9 Print ISBN 978-1-4020-2045-2 Online ISBN 978-1-4020-2051-3 Publisher Springer Netherlands Copyright Holder Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. Additional Links About this Book Agriculture Soil Science & Conservation Forestry Topics Industry Sectors Chemical Manufacturing Energy, Utilities & Environment Consumer Packaged Goods eBook Packages eBook Package english full Collection eBook Package english Biomedicine & Life Sciences Marjatta Eilittä Joseph Mureithi Rolf Derpsch C. K. K. Gachene (1) C. S. Wortmann (2) Editors Authors Author Affiliations 1. University of Nairobi, Kenya 2. University of Nebraska, USA 7,641,147 scientific documents at your fingertips Browse by Discipline Legal Springer for Research & Development