Structured Consultation Document

advertisement
Consultation Document
Coordinated Network
Plan 2016 – 2025
Development
Consultation Document
Coordinated Network Development Plan 2016 – 2025
Consultation document on Coordinated Network Development Plan 2016 -2025
With this document, the Market Area Manager (MAM) together with the Austrian Transmission
System Operators (TSOs) GAS CONNECT AUSTRIA GmbH (GCA) and Trans Austria Gasleitungs GmbH (TAG) is launching a formal public consultation on the Coordinated Network Development Plan (CNDP) 2016 -2025.
The MAM and the TSOs have already received valuable feedback from market participants in
the course of the Stakeholder Joint Working Session on 01 July 2015. As a follow-up, a written
consultation on the CNDP 2016 -2025 should give further insight on the expectations for the
planning instrument.
The MAM, together with the Austrian TSOs, has endeavored to take into account each and
every comment received and encourages stakeholders to stay actively involved throughout
the process of the CNDP. Through the response to this public consultation, market participants will contribute to a continuous development of the Austrian CNDP.
The written consultation will be from 06 July 2015 to 20 July 2015. Responses should be
submitted by email to the following mail box: [email protected]
This public consultation should not only be taken as a regulatory obligation by the MAM together with the TSOs, but as a necessary step for the continuous evolution of the CNDP, aiming at the fulfillment of market participants’ expectations.
1
Consultation Document
Coordinated Network Development Plan 2016 – 2025
1. Contact Details
Name
First and Last Name:
Organisation
Company/Organisation Name:
Job Title:
Contact details
Email:
Tel:
Company Address
Street:
Postal Code:
City:
Country:
Please describe your organization (X)
Project promoter
End user
Network user
Trader
Other (please specify)
2
Consultation Document
Coordinated Network Development Plan 2016 – 2025
PART A – Feedback on specific chapters of the CNDP 2016 – 2025
Chapter 1: Preface
To what extent does this chapter meet your expectations?
Very poorly
Poorly
Average
Well
Which parts of this chapter do you particularly appreciate, if any?
Very well
Which parts of this chapter should be particularly improved upon in the next edition, if any? If
yes, do you have any suggestion?
Chapter 2: Planning Process – Time Schedule
To what extent does this chapter meet your expectations?
Very poorly
Poorly
Average
Well
Very well
To which extent does the planning process of the CNDP 2016 – 2025 meet your expectations?
Very poorly
Poorly
Average
Well
Very well
Which parts of this chapter/planning process do you particularly appreciate, if any?
Which parts of this chapter/the planning process should be particularly improved upon in the
next edition, if any? If yes, do you have any suggestion?
Chapter 3: Introduction
To what extent does this chapter meet your expectations?
Very poorly
Poorly
Average
Well
Which parts of this chapter do you particularly appreciate, if any?
Very well
Which parts of this chapter should be particularly improved upon in the next edition, if any? If
yes, do you have any suggestions?
3
Consultation Document
Coordinated Network Development Plan 2016 – 2025
Chapter 4: Transit Market Austria
To what extent does this chapter meet your expectations?
Very poorly
Poorly
Average
Well
Which parts of this chapter do you particularly appreciate, if any?
Very well
Which parts of this chapter should be particularly improved upon in the next edition, if any? If
yes, do you have any suggestions?
Chapter 5: Coordinated Network Development Plan in Context
To what extent does this chapter meet your expectations?
Very poorly
Poorly
Average
Well
Which parts of this chapter do you particularly appreciate, if any?
Very well
Which parts of this chapter should be particularly improved upon in the next edition, if any? If
yes, do you have any suggestion?
Chapter 6: Projekt Survey of Market Area Manager
To what extent does this chapter meet your expectations?
Very poorly
Poorly
Average
Well
Which parts of this chapter do you particularly appreciate, if any?
Very well
Which parts of this chapter should be particularly improved upon in the next edition, if any? If
yes, do you have any suggestions?
4
Consultation Document
Coordinated Network Development Plan 2016 – 2025
Chapter 7: From projected to actual demand
To what extent does this chapter meet your expectations?
Very poorly
Poorly
Average
Well
Which parts of this chapter do you particularly appreciate, if any?
Very well
Which parts of this chapter should be particularly improved upon in the next edition, if any? If
yes, do you have any suggestions?
Chapter 8: Network Development Plan GCA
To what extent does this chapter meet your expectations?
Very poorly
Poorly
Average
Well
Which parts of this chapter do you particularly appreciate, if any?
Very well
Which parts of this chapter should be particularly improved upon in the next edition, if any? If
yes, do you have any suggestions?
Chapter 9: Network Development Plan TAG
To what extent does this chapter meet your expectations?
Very poorly
Poorly
Average
Well
Which parts of this chapter do you particularly appreciate, if any?
Very well
Which parts of this chapter should be particularly improved upon in the next edition, if any? If
yes, do you have any suggestions?
5
Consultation Document
Coordinated Network Development Plan 2016 – 2025
PART B – General Feedback to the CNDP 2016 – 2025 and the related process
Layout of the report (clarity of the analysis, graphical representation…)
To what extent do you find that the form of the report supports its content?
Very poorly
Poorly
Average
Well
Which layout elements do you particularly appreciate, if any?
Very well
Do you see any potential for improvement of the layout of the report? If yes, do you have any
suggestions?
Stakeholder engagement process
Do you find that both the MAM and the TSOs offered you sufficient opportunity to be involved
in CNDP process?
Yes:
No:
Have you taken part in the Stakeholder Joint Working Session related to the CNDP 2016 2025?
Yes:
No:
Which part of the process have you particularly appreciated, if any (public workshop, Stakeholder Joint Working Sessions, non-binding market survey…)?
Do you have any suggestions regarding how the MAM and the TSOs could improve the engagement process?
General comment
What is your overall appreciation of the CNDP 2016 - 2025?
Very poor
Poor
Average
Good
Very good
Do you have any additional comments on the potential improvement of the CNDP?
6
Consultation Document
Coordinated Network Development Plan 2016 – 2025
7
Download
Random flashcards
Arab people

15 Cards

Pastoralists

20 Cards

Nomads

17 Cards

Marketing

46 Cards

Create flashcards