15 February 2015 Energy Strategy Submissions Department of State Growth GPO Box 536 Hobart Tasmania 7001 Level 22 530 Collins Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Postal Address: GPO Box 2008 Melbourne VIC 3001 T F 1300 858724 03 9609 8080 By email: Energystrategy@stategrowth.tas.gov.au Dear Sir Tasmanian Energy Strategy submission AEMO is the independent operator and developer of physical energy markets in Eastern and Southern Australia. Among other roles, we are the National Transmission Planner established under the National Electricity Law. Accordingly, AEMO is well placed to comment on a number of matters raised in the Tasmanian Energy Strategy. We welcome the government’s commitment to making Tasmanian energy businesses as efficient as possible. Efficient operations and investment will ensure process are as low as possible while maintaining reliable supply to customers. Energy markets are evolving as technology makes more options available to customers and the ways in which they source their energy needs. A key consequence of changing consumer behaviour is that Australia has entered a new phase of declining demand for grid-supplied electricity. Previously, electricity networks were able to undertake large network augmentations with confidence that even if the investment was not required immediately knowing that eventually demand would grow and the asset would be used and useful. This is no longer the case. Transmission network investment, which is characterised by large, “lumpy” increments, becomes riskier when there is less certainty as to whether the assets will ever be required. In this environment, it is more important than ever to ensure that all new investment in electricity networks is efficient. Accordingly, we take a particular interest in section 4.2 of the strategy paper, which sets out a number of proposals which could help to reduce the cost of delivering electricity via networks.1 AEMO has developed an integrated package of measures which are designed to support efficient transmission investment in the NEM. We: prepare independent, consistently derived forecasts of electricity usage patterns for each NEM region and publish the results in the National Electricity Forecasting Report (NEFR);2 Tasmanian Government. Restoring Tasmania’s Energy Advantage. Available: http://www.stategrowth.tas.gov.au/energy/strategy. Viewed: 12 February 2015, p13-17 2 AEMO. Forecasting page: Available at: http://www.aemo.com.au/Electricity/Planning/Forecasting. 1 develop long-term planning strategies for both current and potential national transmission flow paths3 and publish the results in the annual National Transmission Network Development Plan; conducted a national review of the economic value different users place on a reliable supply of electricity.4 This assists network planners, asset owners, and the AER to align future network investment with how much customers are willing to pay for a secure and reliable electricity supply; prepare independent planning reports which provide an additional source of information for the AER to consider when assessing transmission businesses’ capital expenditure requirements;5 work with TNSPs to develop a list of projects to be included in the AER’s network capability incentive scheme.6 The AER’s scheme rewards TNSPs for undertaking initiatives that improve usage of existing network assets through low-cost projects. Tasmanian customers already benefit from these initiatives. However, there is scope to strengthen the regulatory framework. The figure below shows that there are a range of options which could help to improve the efficiency of Tasmanian energy businesses. Reinforce existing initiatives Establish a regime that commits TasNetworks to work with AEMO when we prepare our demand forecasts and independent planning reports. Obtain independent advice Develop a framework for obtaining independent advice from AEMO with respect to other matters, such as transmission reliability standards. Extend contestability Separate the planning and procurement functions from the role of transmission network owner in order to benefit from impartial decision making and competitive asset provision. In this submission, we discuss each of these options in turn. 1. Reinforce existing initiatives AEMO has established capability to prepare electricity demand forecasts on a consistent and comparable basis across the NEM, at both the regional and transmission connection point levels. AEMO’s forecasts have helped to reduce the pressure on electricity prices insofar as they indicate reduced need for transmission network investment compared to the forecasts prepared by the network businesses. The National Electricity Rules do not specifically require AEMO to develop independent forecasts. 3 National transmission flow paths are defined in the Rules as any portion of transmission networks used to transport significant amounts of electricity between generation centres and load centres. 4 AEMO. Value of Customer Reliability review page: Available at: http://www.aemo.com.au/Electricity/Planning/Value-of-Customer-Reliabilityreview. 5 AEMO. Independent Planning Review page. Available at: http://www.aemo.com.au/Electricity/Planning/Independent-Planning-Review--NSW-and-TasmanianNetwork 6 AER. Electricity Transmission Network Service Providers Service Target Performance Incentive Scheme. Version 4. s 5.2, pg 12.Dec 2012. AEMO SUBMISSION TO TASMANIAN ENERGY STRATEGY CONSULTATION PAGE 2 OF 5 The Energy Council has proposed to amend the National Electricity Rules to formalise AEMO’s demand forecasting role as part of its National Transmission Planner functions, and to ensure that AEMO has access to the information needed in order to prepare high quality forecasts. AEMO recently undertook an independent review of Tasmania’s transmission investment needs over the period 2014-2019. AEMO’s assessment helped TasNetworks to identify several opportunities to reduce its forecast capital expenditure during the current transmission determination. Among other things we identified two planned network augmentation projects which we considered to be unlikely to be required during the period. Between January and September 2014, TasNetworks was able to reduce its forecast transmission capex requirements over the 2014-19 period by $48 million, or 19%.7 While TasNetwork’s own efforts to identify cost savings are the primary driver for this reduction, AEMO’s input helped TasNetworks to achieve this result. In undertaking our independent planning review for Tasmania, AEMO was fortunate to have access to TasNetwork’s forecast cost information. This information was made available as a result of the transitional arrangements for the new rules governing economic regulation. In future, our ability to undertake independent cost assessments will depend on whether network businesses will voluntarily share their cost forecasts with us. We support changes to the National Electricity Rules (or relevant Tasmanian regulations) which ensure that we continue to have access to the information we need to prepare independent planning reports going forward. 2. Obtain independent advice AEMO would be happy to work with the Tasmanian government to develop a framework for obtaining independent advice on matters which affect network costs. AEMO’s specialist transmission planning capability enables it to provide an informed, independent view of transmission network investment requirements. We agree with your view that reliability standards have been a key driver of network costs.8 AEMO considers that the form of reliability standards applied in Tasmania – which do not apply fixed levels of redundancy and take into account load and energy at risk – give rise to more efficient outcomes than the arrangements that apply in some other NEM jurisdictions. There is scope for AEMO assist the Office of the Tasmanian Economic Regulator when it undertakes its review of transmission reliability standards. For instance, AEMO assists the Essential Services Commission of South Australia (ESCOSA) when it determines the reliability standards that should apply at South Australian transmission connection points. At ESCOSA’s request, we advise whether reliability standards for any connection points should change in light of various factors including AEMO’s demand forecasts and the Value of Customer Reliability (VCR) specific to each connection point. AEMO also provides advice to the South Australian government on other matters, such as the extent to which ElectraNet’s capital expenditure aligns with the investment program accepted by the AER during the regulatory determination process.9 7 See TransEnd, Transitional Revenue Proposal, 31 January 2014 and AER, Draft decision TasNetworks transmission determination 2015-16 to 2018-19 Overview, November 2014. 8http://www.stategrowth.tas.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/97236/Tasmanian_Energy_Strategy_2 0141219.pdf 9 http://www.aemo.com.au/Electricity/Planning/South-Australian-Advisory-Functions AEMO SUBMISSION TO TASMANIAN ENERGY STRATEGY CONSULTATION PAGE 3 OF 5 The government may wish to consider whether to develop a framework for obtaining independent advice from AEMO with respect to matters which affect network costs. An example of this type of arrangement is our South Australian Advisory Functions, which we provide in accordance with the National Electricity Law.10 3. Adopt a contestable model AEMO welcomes the government’s consultation on whether a contestable transmission framework, such as the one that applies in Victoria, would be beneficial in Tasmania. Pro-competitive reforms have the potential to benefit customers through lower prices and more innovative service offerings. There are also benefits associated with an independent transmission planner. The regulatory framework provides little or no incentive on network businesses to efficiently invest and to find alternatives to building assets. In contrast, AEMO’s objective in delivering transmission services is to ensure that the network will, over the long term, minimise total delivered cost of electricity to consumers. Chart 1 below compares the transmission regulatory asset base per megawatt of peak demand for Tasmania, South Australia and Victoria. It shows that Tasmanians have invested more than twice as much as Victorians to meet each megawatt of peak demand. While there are a number of drivers for these results (such as asset ages and population density) we consider that the Victorian market framework is a relevant factor. Chart 1 Comparison of regulatory asset bases per MW of peak demand RAB per MW of peak demand (real $k 2014) 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 AusNet/AEMO ElectraNet 2010 2011 2012 2013 TasNetworks SOURCE: AER AND AEMO. In this competitive model, where it has been decided an increase in a service level is required, the independent planner-procurer can in many cases use the competitive market to source the lowest cost solution. AEMO fulfils this role in the Victorian transmission network and, in this role, has observed a significant increase in the level of competition in its tender processes over recent years. The increase in competition applies both between rival providers of network solutions (as network businesses seek new opportunities) and between network and non-network solutions. 10 National Electricity Law, Section 50B. AEMO SUBMISSION TO TASMANIAN ENERGY STRATEGY CONSULTATION PAGE 4 OF 5 In a situation of low or falling demand, the potential benefits associated with contestability are expected to increase. There is now more scope to consider alternatives to expensive, lumpy network upgrades. Options such as demand management and embedded generation have the potential to be more cost effective and flexible in circumstances where it is unclear whether an identified constraint is likely to persist. There is scope to develop a contestable framework which is tailored to the needs of the Tasmanian electricity market. A tailored solution could establish the range of projects for which contestability might apply and whether funding and ownership of these projects was also contestable. 4. Conclusion AEMO would welcome the opportunity to work with the government to develop strategies to ensure that Tasmanian energy businesses are as efficient as possible. If you would like to discuss the ideas set out in this submission, please don’t hesitate to contact Louis Tirpcou on 03 9609 8415 or louis.tirpcou@aemo.com.au. Yours sincerely David Swift Executive General Manager, Corporate Development AEMO SUBMISSION TO TASMANIAN ENERGY STRATEGY CONSULTATION PAGE 5 OF 5