Gd 5 - AIP FTP Server

advertisement

Supporting Information

Gd

5

(Si,Ge)

4

thin film displaying large magnetocaloric and strain effects due to magnetostructural transition

Ravi L. Hadimani 1* , Joao H. B. Silva 2* , Andre M. Pereira 3 , Devo L. Schlagel 4 , Thomas A. Lograsso 5 ,

Yang Ren 6 , Xiaoyi Zhang 6 , David C. Jiles 1 and Joao P. Araújo 2#

* - Both authors contributed equally to this work

1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011,

USA Ames Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA

2 IFIMUP and IN-Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Departamento de Física e

Astronomia da Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, 687, 4169-

007 Porto, Portugal

3 Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ

4 Ames Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA

5 Ames Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA

Division of Materials Science and Engineering, Ames Laboratory, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA

6 X-ray Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA

# Corresponding author: jearaujo@fc.up.pt

Experimental Section (more details)

Thin film deposition: A multigrain sample of Gd

5

Si

1.3

Ge

2.7

prepared from high purity materials by Tri-arc method was used as a target material in a pulsed laser deposition

(PLD) system. A femtosecond laser with the pulse energy of 3.5mJ and a repetition rate of

1000 Hz was used in the PLD system. The film was deposited on a 1μm SiO

2

layer on the top of a (001) silicon substrate at 200° C and 1.2×10 6 torr. The rate of deposition was about

20 nm/sec. The use of a femtosecond laser with higher repetition rate caused coulomb ablation due to multi-photon absorption or coulomb explosion.

Characterization: In the SEM/EDS analysis, the maximum accelerating voltage of the electron beam was determined to be 15 kV. K line of Germanium and Silicon (9.8 kV and 1.74kV, respectively) and L line of Gadolinium (6.05kV) were considered for composition calculations. To estimate the chemical stoichiometry, Monte-Carlo simulation software was used to determine the maximum acceleration voltage of the beam that does not penetrate the deposited film and reach the silicon dioxide on silicon substrate during

EDS analysis.

All magnetic measurements were performed at the superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) from Quantum Design. The magnetization temperature dependency was measured first on cooling and then on heating in the [10, 300] K

temperature range with a constant 1000 Oe magnetic field. The rate of cooling and heating was the same and equal to 2.333 K / min. Afterwards, the film was cooled again to 5K, in order to measure the M vs H curve at this temperature. The M vs H isothermal curves were measured according with the loop method 1 in the [135, 275] K temperature range, with increasing and decreasing field and a step of ~ 1250 Oe.

Synchrotron x-ray diffraction measurements of the thin film sample were carried out at the beamline 11-ID-D, Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory. The wavelength of the x-rays was 0.765335 Å, and an Oxford cryostream system was used for the temperature dependent measurements. Two dimensional diffraction patterns were collected using a Pilatus area detector, and converted to the conventional one-dimensional diffraction curves using the Fit2D program.

Supplementary Table captions T1:

Magnetocaloric effect of a set of thin film materials presenting the highest Ι ΔS m

Ι

MAX reported so far in the literature.

Chemical Composition Thickness nm

Gd

5

Si

1.3

Ge

2.7

788

Gd

5

Si

1.3

Ge

2.7

Gd

5

Si

1.3

Ge

2.7

788

788

Gd

5

Si

1.3

Ge

2.7

Gd

5

Si

1.3

Ge

2.7

W/Gd/W

W/Gd/W

Ta/Gd/Ta

La

0.7

Sr

0.3

MnO

3

/SrRuO

3

NiMnGa

NiMnGa

NiCoMnIn

La

0.67

Sr

0.33

MnO

3

//

SrTiO

3

La

0.67

Sr

0.33

MnO

3

//

SrTiO

3

MnAs

MnAs

La

0.56

Sr

0.44

MnO

3

20

70

70

31

788

788

5/40/5

5/40/5

5/30/5

8

400

400

300

20

ΙΔS m

Ι

MAX

J K -1 Kg -1

8.83

* (13.6)

7.2

* (11.09)

5.7

* (8.8)

3.7

* (5.7)

1.6

* (2.5)

~1.4

3.2

1.6

2.35

1.7

8.5

< 5

1.1

1.54

4

17

0.3

190

190

190

190

275

275

285

325

346

346

353

321

321

300

300

270

T

0 ᵻ

K

190

RCP Reference

J Kg -1

32

*50

~52

~240

~70

~125

212

*323

156

*241

121

*187

75

*116

This work

This work

This work

This work

This work

2

2

3

4

-

170

<200

~15

5

5

6

7

50 7

>120

774

~10

8

8

9

2

1

1

6

6

1

1

2

1

3

4

3

1.5

1

5

1

ΔH

T

5

La

0.56

Sr

0.44

MnO

3

FeRh

31

100

2

20

Table T1

270

320

6

5

185

431

9

10 ᵻ T

0

is the temperature where the –ΔSm(T) reaches its maximum, -ΔSm

MAX

.

* Represents the values corrected to the efficient O(II) volume fraction that contributes to –ΔSm.

1 L. Caron, Z.Q. Ou, T.T. Nguyen, D.T. Cam Thanh, O. Tegus, and E. Brück, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321 ,

3559 (2009).

2 C.W. Miller, D. V. Williams, N.S. Bingham, and H. Srikanth, J. Appl. Phys. 107 , 09A903 (2010).

3 H.F. Kirby, D.D. Belyea, J.T. Willman, and C.W. Miller, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vacuum, Surfaces, Film.

31 , 031506 (2013).

4 Q. Zhang, S. Thota, F. Guillou, P. Padhan, V. Hardy, a Wahl, and W. Prellier, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 23 ,

052201 (2011).

5 V. Recarte, J.I. Pe ́rez-Landazábal, V. Sánchez-Alárcos, V.A. Chernenko, and M. Ohtsuka, Appl. Phys. Lett.

95 , 141908 (2009).

6 R. Niemann, O. Heczko, L. Schultz, and S. Fähler, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 , 222507 (2010).

7 V.S. Kumar, R. Chukka, Z. Chen, P. Yang, and L. Chen, AIP Adv. 3 , 052127 (2013).

8 D. Mosca, F. Vidal, and V. Etgens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 , 125503 (2008).

9 D.D. Belyea, T.S. Santos, and C.W. Miller, J. Appl. Phys. 111 , 07A935 (2012).

10 T. Zhou, M.K. Cher, L. Shen, J.F. Hu, and Z.M. Yuan, Phys. Lett. A 377 , 3052 (2013).

Supplementary Figures:

Supplementary Figure S1

Supplementary Figure S1: Magnetization as a function of temperature on cooling (black curve) and on heating (red curve). The thermal hysteresis is highlighted in blue. A magnified M(T) curve is presented in the inset where the transitions are signaled with T

MS c

~ 175.9 K and T

MS h

~ 180.1 K, which were determined by the averaged maximum of the derivative of the curves. Hence, the observed thermal hysteresis is ΔT

MS

= T

MS h

- T

MS c

~4.2

K.

Supplementary Figure S2

Supplementary Figure S2: Magnetization isotherms [ M(H) ] measured in the [165, 195]

K temperature range with a 5 K step, with increasing (lower curves) and decreasing (upper curves) applied magnetic fields in the [0, 50 ] kOe interval. The hysteresis is highlighted in color and is close to zero for the T = 165 and 170 K and reaches a maximum for the T =

180 K isotherm.

Download