EDITORIAL WRITING RUBRIC Mr. Dawkins RJHS JOURNALISM NAME:___________________________________________ Skills Argument 4 Structure Grammar/ Mechanics & Style Sentence Fluency / Voice 3 Argument is clearly stated in one concise, clear sentence Argument is clearly understood early in the article Argument is sound; the opinion is based in fact and logic Research is present, cited, and appropriate for the topic Begins with a solid lead; type of lead fits the topic Nut graf and 5ws allow the reader to understand the topic and argument quickly and clearly Details are given as a back-andforth between opinion and fact. Details and specifics (HOW and WHY) help support claims. Story may come full circle to lead the reader out, or may employ another appropriate lead-out technique Paper has 1-3 total errors in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, verb-tense, AP Style etc… Sentences are varied in length, expression and structure Active voice is used throughout (when possible) Relates to interest of the reader and clearly reflects writer’s ideas Displays a mastery of tone by using confident, clear, and original language. 2 Argument is stated, but may not be clear or concise Argument may be buried or stated too late in the article There may be flaws in the argument; it may not be supported by fact and logic Research is present, but may leave the reader wondering about it or wanting more Lead is present but may be unclear or not fitting for the topic 5ws are present, a nut graf may try too do too much or not enough to explain the topic and argument Details are present and help to back up the claims Paper averages ONE error per paragraph Sentences vary some in length and structure Correct voice used a majority of the time Reflects writer’s ideas well, but may have 0 Argument is unclear; there may be more than one argument or argument may be contradicted. There is no supporting evidence for argument Research may be unfounded, lack proper citing, or be inappropriate for topic Argument is missing altogether; there is no argument Lead may be buried, cliché, or inappropriate There is not a sufficient backand-forth between fact and opinion Details may be lacking Lead is missing altogether The story reads more like a ‘rant’ or a journal entry. There are no details or specifics to back up claims. Paper averages TWO errors per paragraph Paper averages THREE or more errors per paragraph Sentences all start and end the same Voice is emerging, but lacks depth of meaning, is unoriginal or replicates existing story. Sentences all start and end the same Incorrect voice used; voice may be too informal or lacking in originality Some awkward statements detract from meaning Story may be cliché or redundant. It may be the same story we have seen before.