District Physical Activity Profile – Lichfield What the Evidence tells us for Lichfield Physical Activity Table 1: Percentage of adults who are active and inactive compared to Staffordshire and the National Average using date from the Public Health Outcomes Framework and Active People Survey National Public Health Outcomes Measures Measure Definition Percentage of Inactive Adults Doing less than “equivalent” minutes of at least moderate level activity in bouts of 10 minutes or more in the previous 28 days Doing at least 150 “equivalent” minutes of at least moderate level activity in bouts of 10 minutes or more in the previous 28 days. Percentage of Active Adults Rates (%) 30 21.2 60.9 Sport England Active People Survey Measures Staffs (%) 28.5 54.8 England (%) 28.9 Measure Inactive (0x30 mins moderate or higher intensity per week / 0 times / mth) Active (1 x 30 mins moderate or higher intensity per week / 1-11 x 30 mins per mth) Lichfield (%) 46 Staffordshire (%) 48.6 England (%) 47 28.5 27.2 28.3 25.5 24.2 24.7 55.6 Note: Green = better than / Amber = similar to / red = worse than the England average (Statistically significant) Active (3x30 mins) (this was the previous NI8 measure) Note: Green = better than / red = worse than the England average. (Not statistically significant) Top sports in Lichfield? Adults wanting to do more sport. 56% of all adults want to do more sport. 39% of active adults want to do more sport 17% of inactive adults want to do more sport. Sources of information Active People Survey - http://www.sportengland.org/research/about-ourresearch/active-people-survey/ UK Active – Turning the Tide http://ukactive.com/downloads/managed/Turning_the_tide_of_inactivity.pdf Health Survey for England - http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB13218 National Travel Survey https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/34 2160/nts2013-01.pdf What do people want to do? Active People Survey 8 highlighted that there is a latent demand in Lichfield for Swimming. Barriers to participation APS highlights that a significant number of people wish to be more active. Although there are barriers to specific populations common barriers to participation are highlighted below and should be considered when planning programme delivery. Time – people often have the perception that they do not have the time to be active. For this group of people they need opportunities to build activity into their everyday lifestyle / routine such as active commuting (where possible). Personal motivation – motivation is a transient state and some people may not see the need to be active and will not respond to any marketing or offer of activity. For others it may be a case of ensuring that the correct activities and appropriate social marketing are in place in order to move them from contemplating being active to actually being more active. Cost – paying for activities is often a barrier and so activities should be affordable (not necessarily free) and again facilitating ways in which people can build activity into their lives such as walking cycling should be explored. Access to venue – activities should ideally be accessible to the population group they are targeted for. For instance for older people is the venue local or on a bus route. Local research – Where available local research can highlight particular issues / barriers people face before becoming more active. Research1 undertaken with residents, local authorities and the health care system made several conclusions and recommendations for increasing participation in physical activity. 1 People do not want the health message “rammed down their throats” A quarter of respondents stated nothing would motivate to be active. Need to target specific groups and their requirements, promotional material needs to hit home. Motivation to exercise is closely linked with social interaction and enjoyment. Need to tailor activities to the target audience considering such factors as; cost, childcare and times. Respondents to the survey appeared to be inspired by partners and family. Physical activity opportunities should be aimed at including the whole family. Motivation to be physically active is closely linked with social interaction, routine, variety of offer, the ability to progress through providing different levels of intensity and also fun and enjoyment. Of 100 people surveyed, 34% wanted to walk, 30% to swim and 12% to use the gym to be more active. Gardening was also selected by 9% of the sample. Lichfield residents are highly influenced by partners and family when it comes to physical activity, but the majority of respondents are very self-motivated or rely on GPs to motivate them to be active. In Lichfield, 26% stated that free or subsidised gym/swim membership would encourage them to be more physically active. Stimulating demand for physical activity. (2010) South Staffordshire PCT. Voluntary Voice Consultation 2012 (from Lichfield eJSNA) “There is a need for more access to walking groups” “There is a need for youth provision, especially in more remote areas” “There is a need for more accessible activities, and lower cost or no cost activities, away from schools.” Research2 into Staffordshire young women’s participation in physical activity highlighted the following; Barriers – Lack of parental support to be active Insufficient choice of activities No one to be active with Space dominated by boys Parental rules about girls playing outside Expectations that girls help around the house Attitudinal barriers Lack of confidence and skills Only talented individuals really encouraged Self consciousness Being sporty is not aspirational for girls Not as high priority as academic work Few role models As a brief guide when planning activities for young women they should Involve peers and friends Should be; fun, Focus on participation and not always competitive Be accessible and affordable. Consider opportunities to discuss body image and confidence and female male body norms. Following on from this research a number of programmes were delivered across the county. More details can be found here. http://www.youthbox.info/HelpAdvice/SASSOT-Girls-Active-Final-Report-July-2014.pdf 2 Young Women, Physical Activity and Competitive Sport. Staffordshire County Council. Wider Impact (2013) Social Marketing and Sport England Market Segmentation As well as ensuring the programmes and activities are affordable, in the right location etc some consideration should be given to the type of participant that is being targeted and what is the most appropriate method of marketing to engage them. The Sport England Market Segmentation tool (http://sae.sportengland.org/) segments local populations and identifies the predominant “type” of people at Middle Super Output Area and Local Super Output Area (Ward level). This enables a more targeted approach to be taken to marketing and commissioning of activity at a local level. An overview of the segments is provided in Appendix 1. NB – This profile can viewed at LSOA where the segmentation groups will vary to the MSOA pattern. Outcomes Prog’ type Outcomes (from) (Bold italic – public health outcome indicators) Cycling Cycling programmes should be supported by local strategies, plans and infrastructure development. Increase in frequency / intensity of physical activity of the participant. to meet 150mins per week target (optional - 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year) Decrease in sedentary behaviour (moving sedentary people into 30mins of activity) Change in the determinants of physical activity behaviours, e.g. increased knowledge, improved selfefficacy towards activity. Increase in the number of people cycling as a means of active travel Increase in the number of people cycling for recreation Increase use of green spaces for activities related to physical activity and health. Other lifestyle changes / outcomes as a result of participation in programme? (Qualitative data) Outputs (all programmes) Numbers unique of participants entering programme Number of attendances per participant Baseline physical activity levels (pre & post intervention) Participant data e.g. age, sex, ethnicity, disability. Recruitment into programme – how were the participants signposted, where did they here about the programme etc. What works Area wide programmes to promote cycling for both transport and recreational purposes should be linked to existing national and local initiatives. Programmes that work include: o provision of information, including maps and route signing o fun rides, recreational and sponsored group rides and school sports promotions o promote use of leisure routes on and off roads o promote use of off-road mountain bikes, BMX courses, circuits and parks o car-free events or days, virtual cycle races and links with cycle sports events o cycle hire schemes o intensive sessions in particular settings or aimed at particular groups, such as: 'Bike to work' weeks and workplace challenges; activities aimed at children and families (such as 'Bike it', 'Bike club' and other school programmes); and activities for people with impairments who may use specially adapted cycles o activities and campaigns to emphasise the benefits of cycling (including the health benefits, the reliability and ease of access to local facilities and services). More info PH41 – Walking & Cycling http://www.nice.org.uk/guidan ce/ph41 Cycling Towns http://www.tavinstitute.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/01/Tavi stock_Report_Evaluation_of_ Cycling_City__Towns_Progra mme_interimreport_2011.pdf o o Walking Increase in frequency intensity of physical activity of the participant to meet 150mins per week target during the programme duration, (optional - 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year) free cycle safety checks (such as Dr Bike sessions) and cycle maintenance training. Bikeability – cycle training for children and adults. Ensure cycle training is age-appropriate and timed to allow cycling to school to become a habit. In addition, ensure it is appropriate for those with limited mobility who may need additional support. In order to get best value from cycling budgets there is a need to focus the resources on a specific target audience by considering: People: Who are the people who can be persuaded to take up cycling? Place: Where do they live and where do they go? Purpose: Why do these people make these journeys? Behaviour: Consider factors influencing people's behaviour such as their attitudes, existing habits, what motivates them and their barriers to change. Take into account NICE's recommendations on Behaviour change: the principles for effective interventions. Develop coordinated, cross-sector programmes to promote walking for recreation as well as for transport purposes, based on a long-term vision of what is achievable and current best practice (Walking for Health Model). Where appropriate walk programmes should link to existing national and local walking NICE Guidance PH41 Walking and Cycling http://www.nice.org.uk/guidan ce/ph41 http://www.walkingforhealth.or g.uk/ Swimming Decrease in sedentary behaviour (moving sedentary people into 30mins of activity ) / Increase in the number of people walking as a means of active travel Increase in the number of people walking for recreation Increase use of green spaces for activities related to physical activity and health. Change in the determinants of physical activity behaviours, e.g. increased knowledge, improved selfefficacy towards activity. Other lifestyle changes / outcomes as a result of participation in programme? (Qualitative data) initiatives, and incorporate actions in specific settings, such as workplaces and schools. In order to get best value from walking budgets there is a need to focus the resources on a specific target audience by considering: People: Who are the people who can be persuaded to take up walking? Place: Where do they live and where do they go? Purpose: Why do these people make these journeys? Behaviour: Consider factors influencing people's behaviour such as their attitudes, existing habits, what motivates them and their barriers to change. Take into account NICE's recommendations on Behaviour change: the principles for effective interventions. Increase in frequency / intensity of physical activity of the participant. Participation in swimming has been shown to be increased in some of the following methods. ASA Insight reports http://www.swimming.org/asa/ about-us/asa-research-library/ to meet 150mins per week target (optional - 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year) Decrease in sedentary behaviour (moving sedentary people into 30mins of activity) Change in the determinants of physical activity behaviours, e.g. increased knowledge, improved selfefficacy towards activity. Other lifestyle changes / outcomes as a result of participation in programme? (Qualitative data) Physical activity and women Increase in frequency / intensity of physical activity of the participant to meet 150mins per week target during the programme duration, (optional - 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year) Decrease in sedentary behaviour (moving sedentary people into 30 mins of activity) Increase use of green spaces for activities related to physical activity and health. Change in the determinants of physical activity behaviours, e.g. increased Free Swimming Lessons - evidence from the Free Swimming projects suggests targeted free swimming lessons are the most appropriate way to increase swimming participation. Swimming in natural environments has been shown to increase participation in market segmentation groups – Jackie, Alison, Tim Helena, Brenda and Elaine. Structured sessions – providing structured sessions that customers want. Emphasis on group and social activities and outdoor pools. Themed swims and associated campaigns. Local research into Young Women, Physical Activity and Sport highlights some of the barriers to participation. A follow up report highlights some of the successful project funded and their success – Girls Active Project. Swimming in natural environments (see Swimming section) http://www.sportacrossstaffor dshire.co.uk/live/images/cme _resources/Public/Research-Young-Women--PhysicalActvity---Competitive-SportMay-2013.pdf http://www.sportacrossstaffor dshire.co.uk/Sportsequality/w omenandgirlssport/girlsactive project Physical activity and older people knowledge, improved selfefficacy towards activity. Other lifestyle changes / outcomes as a result of participation in programme? (Qualitative data) Increase in frequency / intensity of physical activity of the participant to meet 150mins per week target during the programme duration, (optional - 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year) Decrease in sedentary behaviour (moving sedentary people into 30 mins of activity) Decrease in Injuries due to falls in people aged 65 and over. Decrease in hip fractures in people aged 65 and over. Increased muscular strength and endurance. Improved balance. Change in the determinants of physical activity behaviours, e.g. increased knowledge, improved selfefficacy towards activity. Increase use of green spaces for activities related to physical activity and health. Other lifestyle changes/ outcomes as a result of Some of the key considerations when planning physical activity for older people are: Participation is influenced (positively and negatively) by significant others and social support. This includes health professionals (including general practitioners), exercise and physical activity instructors, teachers and leaders, care givers, family, friends and their peers. Social cohesion: Mutual trust, shared values and solidarity among neighbours are associated with increased levels of physical activity amongst older adults Older adults report being prevented from taking part in a range of activities because of shortage of transport. Walking for Health type programmes are predominantly attended by older adults. Start Active , Stay Active https://www.gov.uk/governme nt/uploads/system/uploads/att achment_data/file/216370/dh _128210.pdf participation in programme? (Qualitative data) Physical activity and young People (5-18 years) Physical Activity and Under 5s Increase in frequency / intensity of physical activity of the participant to meet 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity per day. (optional - 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year) Decrease in sedentary behaviour (moving sedentary people into 30 mins of activity) Change in the determinants of physical activity behaviours, e.g. increased knowledge, improved selfefficacy towards activity. Improved fitness levels in target group Increase use of green spaces for activities related to physical activity and health. Other lifestyle changes / outcomes as a result of participation in programme? (Qualitative data) Increase in frequency / intensity of physical activity of the child to meet 180mins per day target during the School based interventions (programmes) are considered most effective Ensure school playgrounds are designed to encourage varied, physically active play. Primary schools should create areas (for instance, by using different colours) to promote individual and group physical activities such as hopscotch and other games. Move More evaluation Start Active , Stay Active https://www.gov.uk/governme nt/uploads/system/uploads/att achment_data/file/216370/dh _128210.pdf For pre-school children, physical activity should mainly comprise of unstructured, active play and learning loco-motor, stability and object-control skills. Start Active , Stay Active https://www.gov.uk/governme nt/uploads/system/uploads/att achment_data/file/216370/dh _128210.pdf programme duration, (optional - 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year) Decrease in time being sedentary. Improved motor skills of target group. Increase use of green spaces for activities related to physical activity and health. Change in the determinants of physical activity behaviours, e.g. increased knowledge, improved selfefficacy towards activity. Other lifestyle changes / outcomes as a result of participation in programme? (Qualitative data) Examples of what has worked This section can be used to insert details of programmes that may worked locally in the past. BHFNC have published a series of case studies that demonstrates good practice in development and delivery of evidence based programmes. http://www.bhfactive.org.uk/us erfiles/Documents/Casestudy booklet.pdf Data Collection Standard Evaluation Framework for Physical Activity Interventions – http://www.noo.org.uk/uploads/doc/vid_16722_SEF_PA.pdf This site signposts to a number of tools to assess physical activity in varying populations and in varying detail – http://dapa-toolkit.mrc.ac.uk/physical-activity-assessment/methods/questionnaire/examples-and-links.html Single Item Measures What’s know as a single item measure question may not be as detailed as tool included above however they maybe more suitable in a community setting where asking for too much detail maybe a barrier to participation. This example could be used to measure an increase in volume of activity towards the 150mins (5x30 per week) or moving people from sedentary to active (0x to 1x30). This example is the one used on the Walking for Health Initiative. In the past week on how many days have you done a total of 30 minutes or more (in bouts of 10 minutes or more) physical activity which was enough to raise your heart rate. (This may include sport, exercise and brisk walking and cycling for recreation or to get to and from places. Should not include housework or physical activity that is part of your job.)