14 May 2014 Renewable Energy Target Review Expert Panel SUBMISSION TO THE RENEWABLE ENERGY TARGET REVIEW RELATING TO GRANVILLE HARBOUR WIND FARM GRANVILLE HARBOUR TASMANIA THE SOCIAL IMPACTS OF SOVEREIGN RISK AND MARKET UNCERTAINTY Dear Expert Panel Members, I welcome the opportunity to comment on the social effects relevant to the Renewable Energy Target (RET) Review, specifically in the areas of sovereign risk and market uncertainty and the potential impacts that could flow from major changes and frequent reviews of the target. This submission paper relates directly to the Granville Harbour Wind Farm project in Tasmania, in order to provide some specific examples of the social effects that major change and uncertainty with regard to the RET can have on initiative, hard work, community spirit and self-reliance. In order to do so effectively, it is important to look at history. Located on a plateau of rich, red basalt soils, just north of the coastal community of Granville Harbour, Granville Farm overlooks the Southern Ocean on Tasmania’s rugged west coast. It is potentially Tasmania’s most isolated farm, producing some of Australia’s highest quality grass fed beef, from what is one of the cleanest farming environments on the planet. The 3000 acre farm has been a life long journey for the Smith family. After the turn of the last century, Zeehan, (“The Silver City”) had a population of 10,000 with 27 pubs and a lot of hungry miners to feed. Cattle were driven down the west coast of Tasmania, swum across the notorious Pieman River and rested and fattened at Granville Farm before being driven to market in Zeehan. In the 1960’s, the Smith’s and a friend leased the land which comprised of 30 soldier settlement grant titles. Originally cleared by axe, much of the bush on the farm had 1 regrown as Zeehan’s population had declined over the years and the demand for local beef had all but disappeared. The Smith’s purchase of the land, provided the opportunity for the farm to be established in a way that both preserved native habitat and facilitated the production of premium quality beef. Today, the property sustains up to 1850 head of premium beef cattle on 2000 acres of prime pasture with 1000 acres of native forest shelterbelts. No external livestock have been introduced into the property for over 30 years to help reduce pathogens and minimise drenching programs. Breeding is mainly through artificial insemination. The farm is Cattle Care and European Union Export Accredited and has achieved quality grading’s of over 98% from Meat Standards Australia. The Smith’s ultimate vision was twofold. Having created a world class beef cattle property, the next part of the Smith’s vision was to produce renewable energy to supplement the cattle operation, build self-reliance, provide employment and business confidence to the local community and provide additional energy security to Tasmania. The 99MW (33 turbine) project received Local Government approval on 8 May 2014, having secured State and Federal approval in the preceding 18 months. The project due diligence and Local, State and Federal Government approvals process spanning three years, was solely funded by the Smith family and the operations of the farm. There were no third party investors or developers. The support from the local community towards the project has been outstanding. During State and Local Government project assessment, only one public submission was received and it was in support of the project. It proves that wind farms can be winners if they are well planned, well sited and present no significant environmental impacts. The Federal Government advised the project was not a controlled action (if conducted in a particular manner) which exemplified the minimal environmental impact of the project. In essence, the initiative, perseverance and hard work of the Smith family are the character traits that are often displayed in regional Australia and these traits deserve to be recognised and encouraged for the social and economic benefits they create. 2 Sovereign Risk It is disheartening to see any worthwhile endeavour, particularly one that takes considerable commitment, foresight and hard work, be negated by a change in Government policy, regardless of the imperatives for change. A significant reduction in the RET could potentially place the future of the Granville Harbour Wind Farm project in jeopardy and send a clear message to the many interested and supportive families and businesses in the region, that the initiative, hard work and “can do” approach of one family to help build self-reliance and a more prosperous community, can be destroyed at the stroke of a pen. In a relatively depressed region with fluctuating employment opportunities in the mining and tourism sectors, the effect of this reduction in confidence cannot be underestimated. To the close knit and conservative regional communities on the west coast of Tasmania, the term sovereign risk is generally associated with the largely foreign owned mining sector and proposed policy changes that could have an effect on foreign investment. For it to be seen as a barrier to local business and future job growth, it would create significant levels of distrust in Government decision making and erode business confidence. Given that the project has received approval from all layers of Government, it would be seen by the community as a cynical move by the Government to change the policy settings to the extent where the project was in jeopardy, regardless of the economic drivers. In the unforseen event that a significant change in the RET was implemented, that effected or potentially jeopardised the project, it would be in the interests of both Government and the communities involved to ensure that “grandfather clauses” were in place to facilitate the delivery of the project, due largely to the considerable social capital invested and the fact the project is approved across all levels of Government. Without these clauses, trust in Government initiatives would be derided and the community would view innovation and foresight as too risky. It is requested the panel take into account the following issues in relation to sovereign risk when determining any changes to the RET: Sovereign risk has a high social cost as well as an economic one in regional communities where employment opportunities are often less than in urban areas; Changes in Government policy that create sovereign risk erode business confidence and innovation; and Governments’ intent on changing policy (regardless of the reason) that have the potential to create sovereign risk should include “grandfather clauses” to protect and reward the good faith and hard work of proponents and provide 3 a “safety net” for communities who have often invested considerable social capital in the project at stake. Market Uncertainty Constant Government indecision, review, ambiguity and policy change can reduce business and community confidence to a level where investment stops, unemployment jumps and health and wellbeing are jeopardised. The same principles apply to the renewable energy sector with continual reviews of the RET. The old saying “if it isn’t broken, why fix it” applies. Any business sector under constant Government review finds investment difficult and confidence erodes. The RET should be reviewed as and when the market circumstances dictate a review, and not on a statutory timed basis. In the context of the Granville Harbour Wind Farm, conducting RET reviews as and when required builds investor and community confidence; it builds faith in Government policy and helps facilitate a more stable platform for economic growth in the local region as the Government is seen to be proactive to market forces and not reactive. It is requested the panel take into account the following issues in relation to market uncertainty when determining any changes to the RET: Conduct reviews of the RET based on market circumstances and not on a statutory timed basis; and Develop a policy framework that reviews the market circumstances surrounding the RET to help identify trends, opportunities and threats. Conclusion This submission to the RET review has been written in regard to the social impacts of changes to the RET that would apply to impacts on sovereign risk and market uncertainty in the context of the proposed Granville Harbour Wind Farm. The intent was to highlight the social impacts that significant negative changes to the RET would have on a number of regional west coast Tasmanian communities. It also highlights the impacts a negative change in policy can have on business confidence and innovation. The social effects of a major winding back of the RET in this Tasmanian context cannot be underestimated at the local and regional level. 4 A visit by the panel to Granville Farm and the local community would be most welcomed and would provide the panel a first-hand opportunity to gain a better understanding of the significance of the issues at stake. For your consideration Yours faithfully, ALEX SIMPSON Resident – Granville Harbour Tasmania 5