Objective #: 2 Status: Completed Decision: Met Organization Type

advertisement
Objective #:
2
Status:
Completed
Decision:
Met
Organization Type:
School
Organization:
High School
Role:
Classroom Teacher (High School: Geometry)
Grade Level(s):
10
Content Area:
Math
Rationale:
This objective supports the district goals.
Population:
Period 2 ELA Geometry course, a population of ~30 students.
Interval of Time:
One semester
Assessment:
Benchmark - Math
Baseline:
Benchmark pre-test, given fall 2010.
Expected Growth:
85% of students will advance at least one grade band on questions relating to
Area, Surface Area and Volume.
Concurrently, 60% of students will advance at least two grade bands.
Learning Content:
The objective focuses on the student's understanding of area & volume, and
effectively answering standardized test questions in these areas.
Strategies:
lecture, investigative learning, individual practice, assessments, progress tracking,
algebra skills practice, discussion, student presentations, students checking each
other’s work, discussion.
Objective #:
2
Status:
Completed
Decision:
Met
Organization Type:
School
Organization:
High School
Role:
Classroom Teacher (High School: Geometry)
Grade Level(s):
9
Content Area:
Math
Rationale:
This objective supports a team goal.
Population:
This goal includes 100% of my 9th grade students who complete 9th grade
Geometry during the 2010-2011 school year and attend 85% of the time.
Interval of Time:
One school year
Assessment:
Teacher-Made Assessment
Baseline:
Of the 29 students that took the beginning of the year diagnostic, 13 scored
unsatisfactory, 12 scored partially proficient, and 4 scored proficient.
Expected Growth:
80% of all the students in my classes with 85% yearly attendance will move up at
least one proficiency level as measured by the beginning and end of year exam.
Learning Content:
The learning content of this objective will be focused on those MA standards that
students had the lowest overall level of mastery. For example, MA8.2.5.a had the
lowest score for the class with 6.9% mastery.
Strategies:
Direct instruction, group work, individual work; student presentation, work wall,
cooperative grouping, homework, after school tutorials, differentiated instruction.
Objective #:
2
Status:
Completed
Decision:
Met
Organization Type:
School
Organization:
High School
Role:
Classroom Teacher (High School: Geometry)
Grade Level(s):
9
Content Area:
Math
Rationale:
This objective supports a team goal.
Population:
This goal includes 100% of my 9th grade students who complete 9th grade
Geometry during the 2010-2011 school year and attend 85% of the time.
Interval of Time:
One school year
Assessment:
Teacher-Made Assessment
Baseline:
Of the 29 students that took the beginning of the year diagnostic, 13 scored
unsatisfactory, 12 scored partially proficient, and 4 scored proficient.
Expected Growth:
80% of all the students in my classes with 85% yearly attendance will move up at
least one proficiency level as measured by the beginning and end of year exam.
Learning Content:
The learning content of this objective will be focused on those MA standards that
students had the lowest overall level of mastery. For example, MA8.2.5.a had the
lowest score for the class with 6.9% mastery.
Strategies:
Direct instruction, group work, individual work; student presentation, work wall,
cooperative grouping, homework, after school tutorials, differentiated instruction.
Objective #:
1
Status:
Completed
Decision:
Met
Organization Type:
School
Organization:
High School
Role:
Classroom Teacher (High School: Geometry)
Grade Level(s):
10
Content Area:
Math
Rationale:
This objective supports the school improvement plan goals.
Population:
All geometry students in periods 2 and 8 who attend class 85% or more of the
time.
Interval of Time:
One school year
Assessment:
Benchmark - Math
Baseline:
0% of the students were proficient or advanced on standard C01.
Expected Growth:
85% of students who attend 85% of the time will be proficient or advanced on
MHS standard C01 as measured by acuity and teacher made assessments. That
is of the 44 students, 38 of them will be proficient or advanced
Learning Content:
Graphing, functions, shifting graphs.
Strategies:
AVID strategies, WICR, SCR's, Visual Verbal Word Association.
Objective #:
1
Status:
Completed
Decision:
Met
Organization Type:
School
Organization:
High School
Role:
Classroom Teacher (High School: Geometry)
Grade Level(s):
9, 10
Content Area:
Math
Rationale:
This objective supports a team goal.
Population:
Period 4 Geometry students who attend at least 90% of the time and earned 0-1
(out of 2) points on the pre-test.
Interval of Time:
One school year
Assessment:
Teacher-Made Assessment
Baseline:
The 89% of the students who failed the pretest in period 4.
Expected Growth:
90% of students who attend 90% of the time will show average 50% growth on
the Pythagorean Theorem end assessment.
Learning Content:
Pythagorean Theorem
Strategies:
Instruction, collaborative learning, and small-group instruction.
Objective #:
2
Status:
Completed
Decision:
Met
Organization Type:
School
Organization:
High School
Role:
Classroom Teacher (High School: Geometry)
Grade Level(s):
9
Content Area:
Math
Rationale:
This objective supports a team goal.
Population:
This goal includes 100% of my 9th grade students who complete 9th grade
Geometry during the 2010-2011 school year and attend at least 85% of the time.
Interval of Time:
One school year
Assessment:
Teacher-Made Assessment
Baseline:
Of my 28 Algebra students that took the beginning of the year diagnostic, 1
scored Advanced, 13 scored Proficient, 9 scored Partially Proficient and 5 scored
Unsatisfactory.
Expected Growth:
80% of all of the students in my Geometry class with 85% attendance will move
up at least one proficiency level as measured by the beginning and end of the
year exam.
Learning Content:
The learning content of this objective will be focused on those MA standards that
students had the lowest overall level of mastery. For example, MA 9.2 and 8.5-both of which had an average of under 52%.
Strategies:
Direct instruction, group work, individual work; student presentation, work wall,
collaborative grouping, homework, after school tutorials, differentiated instruction.
Download